Sabbatean Frankism Research ... Page 1 ... Page 2 ... Page 3 ... Page 4


The Zionist New World Order by Clint Robinson (June 16, 2009)The time is urgent White Patriots! There is no other choice, the time is now, we eitherbreak free or we submit to what the Zionist New World Order has in store for us.However, submission to tyranny is not an option that any true patriot can accept. Thetime to resist is NOW!! Tomorrow may be too late.Let us get one thing straight. Zionism is more than just a plan to establish "a homelandfor the Jews". It goes far beyond that. It is a plan for world domination and the conquestof all the worlds resources, including oil. If we would transform our ideal picture of the [Aryan] People’s State into a reality we shall have to keep independent of the forces that now control public life and seek for new forces that will be ready and capable of taking up the fight for such an ideal. For a fight it will have to be, since the first objective will not be to build up the idea of the People’s State but rather to wipe out the Jewish [controlled] State which is now in existence. -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Ch. 5 (Murphey translation) [For] winning back the independence of a nation [...] it will suffice if a small remnant, no matter how small, of this nation and State will exist, provided it possesses the necessary independence to become not only the vehicle of the common spirit of the whole [Aryan] people but also to prepare the way for the military fight to reconquer the nations liberty. --Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf Vol.2 Ch.13 (Murphey translation)bb
2. Contents

● Global Zionism (One World Government)dfg.

● Judeo-Liberalism

● Open Borders and Third World Immigration into White Homelands

● The Transition to Judeo-Fascism

● Greater Israel

● Universal Wars (World Wars)

● Zionist Control of the Media

● Zionism and Despotic Capitalism

● The Judeo-Masonic Plutocracy

● The Role of Freemasonry in The Zionist New World Order

● Zionist Control of America

● The House of Rockefeller

● The Nixon White House

● The 9-11 Terrorist Attacks

● From the Frying Pan into the Fire – The Subtle Victory

● The New Europe

● Judaism – The Religion of The Chosen Parasite

● Predicting the Future

● Who are the Elders of Zion?

● The Jewish World Tyrant
3. Global ZionismTo many, Zionism is the program to establish a national homeland for the Jewish people.According to Wikipedia: Zionism is a political movement and ideology that supports a homeland for the Jewish People in the Land of Israel, where the Jewish nation originated over 3200 years ago and where Jewish kingdoms and self-governing states existed up to the 2nd century. While Zionism is based in part upon religious tradition linking the Jewish people to the Land of Israel, the modern movement was originally secular, beginning largely as a response to rampant antisemitism in Europe and many parts of the Muslim world during the 19th Century. After a number of advances and setbacks, and after the Holocaust had destroyed Jewish society in Europe, the Zionist movement culminated in the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. LinkBut, we must ask, is it more? Is Zionism merely a desire among the Jewish people to live likeother nations in their own homeland within secure borders OR is it something else? One World Government [O]ur kingdom [the one-world state dominated by Jews] will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any GOYIM [non-Jews] who oppose us by deed or word. (The Protocols of Zion, 5:1) Our [the Jews] international rights will then wipe out national rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their subjects among themselves. (The Protocols of Zion, 2:1)In January 1962, David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel gave an interview to Lookmagazine in which he stated: All continents will become united in a world alliance, at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the scene of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents [emphasis added], as prophesied by Isaiah. (Look magazine, Jan. 1962)A similar view was expressed in the Temple Mount Faithful organization newsletter (undated): The real "United Nations Organization" will be the Kingdom of G-d which will soon be
4. established in Jerusalem, based on the holy laws of G-d. The Temple will again be the heart, soul and focus of Israel and the nations. Mashiach ben David will come and will be the king of Israel and the world. He will come to Jerusalem and rule from there and establish the Kingdom of G-d over all the world. Jerusalem instead of New York will be the center of the this godly "United Nations Organization" and a new era of justice, spiritual holiness, a real law based on the word of G-d in the Torah and a real peace will open and will be established in Jerusalem exactly as Isaiah prophesied: "The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem. And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lords house shall be established on the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow to it. And many people shall go and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths; for from Zion shall go forth Torah, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And he shall judge among the nations, and shall decide for many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, nor shall they learn war any more. O house of Jacob, come, and let us walk in the light of the Lord." (Isaiah 2:1-5) LinkWho or what the Jews are referring to when they write G-d is open to conjecture. Nevertheless,those Christians who think the Jews are referring to God, the Creator of the Universe, when theywrite G-d should bear in mind what Jesus said when addressing the Jews: You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your fathers desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. (John 8:44)In his book On the Jews and Their Lies, Martin Luther stated: Therefore be on your guard against the Jews, knowing that wherever they have their synagogues, nothing is found but a den of devils in which sheer self-glory, conceit, lies, blasphemy, and defaming of God and men are practiced most maliciously... Link | CommentaryOn the wall facing the United Nations building in New York is the famous Isaiah prophecy of thebiblically projected Millennium (Isaiah 2:1-5): "And he shall judge among the nations, and shalldecide for many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears intopruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, nor shall they learn war any more." Abronze sculpture created by Soviet artist Evgeny Vuchetich and presented to the United Nationsin December 1959 by the Government of the USSR, shows the beating of the swords intoplowshares. (following page)
5. Who is being referred to as he in the statement he shall judge among the nations? Well meaningChristians would interpret that as referring to Jesus Christ after his Second Coming. Jews, on theother hand, understand the he to refer to their future world tyrant. As it said in the above quotefrom the Temple Mount Faithful newsletter, he is “Mashiach ben David [who] will come andwill be the king of Israel and the world”. We will have more to say about the Jewish WorldTyrant later.
6. Judeo-LiberalismFrom the 1930s until recently Western countries have seen the gradual development of Judeo-Liberalism. The first noticeable manifestation of this political current was during the Rooseveltadministration, though some might argue that it goes back as far as Woodrow Wilson. It was he,after all, who handed over the American banking system to a group of monopolistic Jews in theform of the Federal Reserve. However, no president before Roosevelt had such an embodiment ofJewish power in his administration in terms of both numbers and real power. His immediateJewish entourage consisted of Felix Frankfurter (Dictator of the New Deal), Henry Mergentaler(international banker), Louis Brandeis (“Father” of the New Deal), and Bernard Baruch(“Unofficial President” of the “Invisible Government”). Roosevelt was himself descended fromDutch Jews and his wife Eleanor was as close to being a card carrying communist withoutactually having the card. She was also one of the driving forces behind the establishment of theUnited Nations Organization. The Alien Star – Roosevelts Supreme Council View larger imageFurther developments came during the 1960s. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 furthered the aims ofthe American Communist Party whose stated goal since around 1903 was to overturn theAmerican social system through the advancement of the Negro and the eventual blending of theWhite with the Negro to produce an easily manipulated mulatto population. The CommunistParty called this the "subtle victory". In the Congressional Record, published by the United States Government Printing Office, Proceedings of the House, 1957, page 8559, you will find the documentation of the Communist plan for using the Negroes to achieve a Communist victory in America. In column one, on page 8559, you will find the following: "Israel Cohen, a leading Communist in England, in his A Racial Program For the Twentieth Century, wrote:
7. We must realize that our Partys most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will instill into the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America into our hands." There you have the Jewish-Communist program in a nutshell - the USE of the backward, childish and savage Negro race to destroy the White Race, which stands between the Jews and their mad goal of world domination from Israel. (White Power, p. 138 by George Lincoln Rockwell [emphasis added])A closely related group, The Frankfurt School, left Germany when it became apparent that Jewshad worn out their welcome there. The arrival of the Frankfurt School on American shores afterAdolf Hitlers rise to power in Germany was like allowing a destructive virus into the bodypolitic. The phenomenon we now know as Political Correctness was their invention. Universityafter University was subverted with their poison and eventually society at large as the newlyminted boobs (to borrow one of R.P. Olivers expressions) obtained their diplomas and emerged.What failed in Germany during the 1930s thanks to Hitler succeeded in North America inthe 1960s with another major outbreak of sickness in the 1990s and carrying through to thepresent. Hitler did not call it Political Correctness. He called it by its real name, Marxism! In reality what distinguished Karl Marx from the millions who were affected in the same way was that, in a world already in a state of gradual decomposition, he used his keen powers of prognosis to detect the essential poisons, so as to extract them and concentrate them, with the art of a necromancer, in a solution which would bring about the rapid destruction of the independent nations on the globe. -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Ch. 1 (Murphey translation) The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man, contests the significance of nationality and race, and thereby withdraws from humanity the premise of its existence and its culture. As a foundation of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest of all recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction for the inhabitants of this planet. -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Ch. 2 (Manheim translation)
8. Jews have historically favored a liberal social agenda because it produced a society morecomfortable to them. Multiculturalism is a good example. When you are an historically despisedminority it is better to surround yourself with other minorities, even (especially) if they are allsquabbling amongst themselves. As David Duke said, "In a divided land the most cohesive groupwill rule". The Jews are nothing if not cohesive. Though egotistic materialists and parasitic bynature, they are able to unite and exert a collective force whenever and wherever their interestsare deemed to be affected. They have historically advanced their own interests by promotinguniversal causes which just happen to benefit them as a mere by-product. The watchwords of theFrench revolution provide a good example: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. The Jewishadvancement of liberal causes has left them in control of a political class in most Western"democracies" and transcending nearly all political parties. So successful have they been thatthey even have been able to frame the parameters of most political debate, in some countries byforce of law.With the collapse of the Soviet bloc a bit of the luster wore off the Communist ideal of a workersparadise. The Marxist workers paradise was a mirage at best and a highly destructive delusion atworst. A letter to Karl Marx from the rabbi Baruch Levy was printed in a Jewish paper in Parisstating that Communism was, after all, merely a way to transfer all the wealth of the world intoJewish hands and so fulfill the Talmud. The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah [until the arrival of The Jewish World Tyrant – ed.]. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this new world order the Children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands. (Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, La Revue de Paris, p. 54, June 1, 1928)[emphasis added]Rabbi Reichhorn delivered a speech in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of the Grand Rabbi SimeonBen-Ihuda where he stated: For centuries the Sons of Israel have been despised and persecuted, but they have fought bravely to prepare the way for victory. Now they are approaching their aim. They already dominate the economic life of the damned Christians; their influence is just as great in politics and in moral fields. At the wished for hour, fixed in advance, we shall let loose the Revolution, which by ruining all classes of Christians will definitely enslave Christendom to us. Thus will be accomplished the promise of God made to his people. (Libre Parole, November 1933, and La Vielle France, March 10, 1921)Winston Churchill wrote an article in The Sunday Herald where he discussed the conflict withinJewish circles between Bolshevism and Zionism. He stated:
9. And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical... This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus- Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire... There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and an the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.Churchill goes on to recommend to the Jews of the world to follow the course of Zionism ratherthan Bolshevism: Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people. (Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920, page 5)
10. Churchill perhaps did not realize that ideologies to Jews are like the many ams of Vishnu. Theyall emanate from the same place with the same goal, the desire for a New World Order basedon Jewish domination – a one-world state under Jew control! Apparent conflicts among Jewsare more about tactics than disputes about ultimate goals. Zionism and Communism are but twoarms of the same beast – Jewish world domination!
11. Open Borders and Third World Immigration into White Homelands Peoples which bastardize themselves, or let themselves be bastardized, sin against the will of eternal Providence, and when their ruin is encompassed by a stronger enemy it is not an injustice done to them, but only the restoration of justice. If a people no longer wants to respect the Nature-given qualities of its being which root in its blood, it has no further right to complain over the loss of its earthly existence. -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Ch. 11 (Manheim translation)Through such things as multiculturalism and diversity the Jew seeks the racial destruction ofthe host population through the mixing of the White and colored races leading to a racialmishmash of mulattoes and the lowering of the racial quality of the highest peoples. The Jewpromotes the displacement and replacement of the intelligentsia of the host population throughhiring quotas and affirmative action in order that the Jew can more easily dominate.Jews fear living in a culture where they are the only minority group. That limits theiradvancement into influential positions since they are naturally viewed with suspicion in such acircumstance (and rightly so!) Consequently, Jews have favored open borders and openimmigration with few restrictions on national origin. This is true of the USA, Canada, and most,if not all formerly White countries. In 1948 the former director of The American Jewish Congressstated: Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism. LinkIn the USA, the immigration floodgates were opened with passage of the Immigration andNationality Act of 1965 (which became law in 1968). About the law Edward Kennedy said: First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same.... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia.... In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think....[emphasis added] LinkThe passage of time has shown his words to be those of either a self-deluded fool or a traitor. Thefirst option would seem to be excluded given his electoral success.Here are some of the Jews Behind The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965:1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
12. 3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of American Jewish Congress (AJC))4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations) Link Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the Bnai Brith, (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law. THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965. LinkMost of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose race, customs, religions, andculture are far removed from anything remotely resembling those of the founding settler peopleswho were predominantly White and Christian with a strong sense of honor, integrity and self-reliance. Within the context of a Jewish-dominated multicultural America, these immigrants areencouraged by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions - all the while asracial mixing and the breeding of mulattoes proceeds apace. The same is true in Canada,Australia, Europe and most, if not all, White homelands.
13. The Transition to Judeo-Fascism In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right - to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism. (The Protocols of Zion,1:14) (Ex-)President George W Bush and (former) head of Dept. of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff (Jew) The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile obedience [to the Jews], will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world. ( The Protocols of Zion 2:2)Leo Strauss was the godfather of the American neo-conservative movement. He was a Jew anddescribed himself as a former Trotskyite ... (recall the many arms of Vishnu). Many of theshining lights of the neo-conservative movement have been his students and actively pursue hispolitical vision. Among them are Bush luminaries such as Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Keyes, WilliamBennett, William Kristol, Allan Bloom, and John Podhoretz among others. His politicalphilosophy views the world in terms of rulers (Jews and their helpers) and the ruled (non-Jews)and it does not give any emphasis to "government by consent of the governed" contained in theAmerican constitution. It can readily be referred to as Judeo-Fascism. It is no wonder that G.W.Bush can refer to the constitution as a "scrap of paper". The Straussian political philosophy grantsfavorable status to deception by government in its administration of the governed.It is characteristic of the neo-conservatives that they pursue Zionist interests as though they werethe same as American interests. Weapons of Mass Destruction was the reason given to a gulliblepublic to support a war (against Iraq in March, 2003) whose real reason was to enhance thesecurity of the state of Israel (Zionism: another arm of Vishnu) and, as a side benefit, to steal theIraqis oil and turn it over to Israel via a pipeline from Mosel to Haifa. A third reason might havebeen related to Saddam Husseins threat to begin selling oil for euros. The real crisis was not IraqiWeapons of Mass Destruction but neo-con Weapons of Mass Deception.
14. Greater IsraelIn his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that thearea of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.”Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to theU.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: “The Promised Land extends from the Riverof Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.” The ‘Blood for Oil’ Pipeline
15. Prior to the 1948 creation of The Zionist Entity in Palestine (”Israel”) by the United Nations andWorld Jewry, an oil pipeline was built by the Iraqi Petroleum Company in 1931 from Mosul inIraq to Haifa in Palestine. Its route is entirely within the territories of present day Iraq, Jordan,and Israel except with a short section going through Syria. It was a mere eight inches in diameter,small by today’s standards, and fell into disuse as a result of the ongoing instability in the regiondue to the presence of The Zionist Entity. However, the route still exists and could be used tobuild a much larger pipeline. The original pipeline is still used for water in Jordan and for jet fuelin Israel.The following story appeared in the Turkish paper Zaman on Sept. 2, 2003.Mosul-Haifa Oil Pipeline Will Turn Region Upside Down The reconstruction of the Musul (Mosul)- Hayfa (Haifa) oil pipeline, starting from Iraq, passing through Jordan and stretching to Israel came up on the agenda with the U.S. occupation of Iraq. According to the Israeli Haaretz daily report, which appeared in [Turkish] newspapers yesterday [Sept. 1,2003], “The U.S. Defense Department (Pentagon) has suggested Haifa as an alternative to Yumurtalik in the exportation of oil from the Kerkuk (Kirkuk) terminal.” Link | Haaretz article (Aug. 25, 2003)The following map shows the location of Iraqi oilfields as well as refining and transportinfrastructure. It does not show the old Mosul-Haifa pipeline because it is not currently in use.
16. This map shows the location of permanent US military bases along the route of the ‘Blood forOil’ pipeline. They are labeled H1, H2, H3, H3, H4 and H5. The bases H1, H2, and H 3 areAmerican bases in Iraq while H4 and H5 are in Jordan. ‘H’ presumably stands for Haifa.The war against Iraq, launched in March, 2003, was carried out under the guise of pre-empting athreat from weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) supposedly being developed by SaddamHussein, then dictator of Iraq. Some commentators, on the left, said it was only to get control ofIraq’s vast oil wealth. Other commentators, on the right, said the war was about getting rid of asecurity threat to Israel. The left called it a War for Oil and the right called it a War for Israel. Itturns out they were both correct!The War against Iraq was to eliminate Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party as a threat tothe Zionist Dream of Greater Israel AND to put one of the world’s largest oil fields, perhapsTHE largest, firmly under the control of Israel and Zionist interests worldwide!The Zionist plan to gain control of the Kirkuk oilfield involves a three prong strategy: ● Gaining effective control of the Kurdish region and turning it into a satellite of Israel ● Separate the Kurdish north from the rest of Iraq ● Provide a means of transport for exporting the oil which avoids southern Iraq and the Persian Gulf (the Blood for Oil pipeline)Zionist control of the Kurdish region
17. The light brown region in the map on the previous page shows part of the Kurdish inhabitedregion. Kurds live in Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Turkey. They have been striving for an independenthomeland which has led them into conflict with both Turkey and the former Iraq governmentunder Saddam Hussein.Notice that the Kurdish region of Iraq approximately coincides with the Kirkuk oil Field inNorthern Iraq.The Kurds have a heavy Jewish population (Link | Link ) and their leader is a Jew (Link).The Jewish Telegraph Agency reported on April 11, 2003: To the world’s surprise, it turns out that one of the Kurds’ top leaders is actually Jewish and that, as a result, the nascent Kurdish country will forge a close alliance with Israel, giving the Jewish state another toehold in the Middle East and access to the oil riches of the Iraqi north [emphasis added]. Link Massoud Barzani, Jewish billionaire and leader of the KurdsReuters reported on Feb. 21, 1999 that Israel had supplied military support to the Kurds:
18. According to Eliezer Tsafrir (former senior Mossad official), Israel had military advisers in 1963-1975 at the headquarters of Mustafa Barzani [father of Massoud Barzani], trained and supplied the Kurdish units with fire arms, field and anti-aircraft artillery. LinkSeymour Hersh reported in The New Yorker, 21 June 2004: Israeli intelligence and military operatives are now quietly at work in Kurdistan, providing training for Kurdish commando units and, most important in Israel’s view, running covert operations inside Kurdish areas of Iran and Syria. Israel feels particularly threatened by Iran, whose position in the region has been strengthened by the war. The Israeli operatives include members of the Mossad, Israel’s clandestine foreign-intelligence service, who work undercover in Kurdistan as businessmen and, in some cases, do not carry Israeli passports. LinkAnd, according to French military intelligence: [A]t the beginning of 2004, about 1,200 agents from Mossad or from Israeli military intelligence were operating in Kurdistan. Their mission: to get Kurdish commando groups on their feet that would be strong enough to counter the Shiite militias in southern Iraq, the latter more or less manipulated by Tehran… LinkSeparating the Kurdish north from the rest of IraqThe Egyptian online weekly Al-Ahram stated quite clearly that the Kurds are striving forindependence and complete control of the Kirkuk oil region: Iraqi politicians who are in the process of framing the future of their country find it convenient to stick their heads in the sand whenever the Kurdish crisis comes up. It is about time the truth is spelled out: the Kurds are not interested in being part of Iraq. Every move they have made so far is geared towards independence. Between now and a bold declaration of the state of Kurdistan there is precious time to create facts on the ground maximising the chances for a viable state. The crown jewel of this endeavour will be the annexation of Kirkuk. Failure to deal with this murky situation from the outset will surely be to the detriment of a unified Iraq. The Kurdish approach to the problem of the oil- rich northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk has been carefully plotted. The Kurds spare no effort to change the demographics of the city. This process involves the re-settlement of Kurds by the tens of thousands and, at the same time, driving out the Arab population at gunpoint. Kurdish officials bluntly declare that they do not want Arabs in their territories. This plot will guarantee the annexation of Kirkuk under the federal arrangement that will give any city the option to join any province it chooses by a majority vote. The 30 January elections provided a clear example of this kind of fraud that went on with impunity. (10 - 16 March 2005 Issue No. 733) LinkThe Washington Post, an organ of Zionist propaganda, reported on August 1, 2005 that for many
19. Kurds in [the] Iraqi North, autonomy is just a means to an end and that they have a ‘highexpectation’ of independence: The demands from Kurdistan for independence and for immediate action on broader territorial claims are shaping much of the debate in Baghdad as Shiite Arabs, Sunni Arabs, Kurds, who mostly practice the Sunni version of Islam, and other groups draft the country’s post-Saddam Hussein constitution. Kurds have led the drive for a federal system for Iraq — one that would leave Kurdistan within Iraq’s borders, but preserve much of the de facto autonomy Kurds gained under U.S. protection after the 1991 Persian Gulf War. Sunni Arabs say the federal system could lead to the breakup of Iraq. Link Members of the Kurdish militia, or pesh merga, train in Irbil in northern Iraq, a region that has enjoyed de facto autonomy under U.S. protection since the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
20. Universal Wars (World Wars) The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our [the Jews] hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not - it goes to the bottom. ( The Protocols of Zion 1:8) We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us [The Jews]: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us [The Jews], then we must offer resistance by a universal war [World War]. [emphasis added] ( The Protocols of Zion 7:3)There are many who believe that WWII began on September 1,1939, the day hostilities broke outbetween Germany and Poland, or that it began on September 3, 1939, the day Britain and Francedeclared war on Germany. However, the real date for its beginning was March 24, 1933. It is truethat no shots were fired that day and no bombs were dropped. However, World Jewry declaredwar on Germany on that day and from that moment onward worked tirelessly to bring about thedeath and mayhem that we now know as World War II. Why did World Jewry declare war onGermany? The simple and also truthful answer is because Adolf Hitler was taking a stand againstthe evil twins of World Jewry: Despotic Capitalism and International Communism. Daily Express, March 24, 1933In a speech at the Zeughaus in Berlin on Mar. 16, 1941, Adolf Hitler stated: They [The Jews] were the elements whose goal that time was to rob the German nation of the most primitive right of life, who in the years of the Versailles Dictate raised as the dogma of the new world order political enslavement and economic impotence, and now are opposed to the revival of our people with the same hatred with which they once pursued the Second Reich. [...] The fact that the American General Wood, before the investigation committee of the
21. American Senate, testified that as early as 1936 Churchill told him Germany was getting too strong again and must be destroyed in a new war established firmly in history the real responsibility for present developments. [...] England and France alone wanted war - not so much the people as a thin stratum of political and financial leadership behind which, [...] stood international Jewry and its world conspiracies of democracy [so-called] and Freemasonry.[emphasis added] (Link)In Churchills War (Vol.1), the historian David Irving describes how Churchill, short on fundsand essentially bankrupt, came under the control of wealthy Jews. The Board of Deputies ofBritish Jews founded an organization called FOCUS set up to incite war against Germany andChurchill was one of its main financial beneficiaries. Churchill became the point man in theeffort to portray National-Socialist Germany as a direct threat against Britain. When wareventually broke out Chamberlain stated that America and the world Jews had forced Englandinto the war. Churchill stated that the basis of the Anti-Nazi Council, later called the FOCUS[was] of course Jewish resentment [against Germany] (David Irving, Churchills War (Vol.1), p.58). Soon after the Nazis seized power, shadowy groups had evolved in Britain and America, united by the aim of restoring the status quo in Germany. These now jointly and severally approached Mr Churchill. Their intervention came not a moment too soon for him. By the end of 1935 he had intimidating debts. No amount of writing dismantled his overdraft. It gnawed at his mind and distracted him from his work. He needed all the financial aid he could get. The president of the Anglo–Jewish Association, Leonard Montefiore, had begun sending him literature on the plight of the German Jews. But it was the Anti-Nazi Council, later known as the FOCUS, that would ensure Churchill’s political and financial survival. (David Irving, Churchills War (Vol.1), p. 58).It was ultimately the South African millionaire Sir Henry Strakosch who agreed to pay offChurchills extensive debts. Sir Henry Strakosch, the gold mining millionaire and chairman ofUnion Corporation Ltd., was a Jew born in Moravia, Czechoslovakia. (David Irving, ChurchillsWar (Vol.1), p. 112).The A.N.C. (Focus) had its roots in New York. The driving force in the founding of the FOCUSwas local New York attorney Samuel Untermeyer (Jew). Its funding came primarily from theBoard of Deputies of British Jews: Funds had been arranged two days earlier at a private dinner in North London, hosted by the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Its vice-
22. president Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, chairman of British Shell, was a char- ismatic Zionist extrovert who would become, in the words of his author- ised biographer Robert Henriques, the ‘veritable dynamic force of FOCUS.’ At a dinner on July 22 at his home, Caen Wood Towers, he launched the initial secret £ 50,000 fund for the FOCUS. His associates signed immediate cheques for £ 25,000 and pledged the rest. It was a colossal sum for such an organisation to butter around in 1936 – five times the annual budget of the British Council. Personally adminis- tered by Waley-Cohen, the fund was used to procure journalists like Times leader-writer Captain Colin Coote – who published for the FOCUS a series of ‘Vigilance’ pamphlets – and for widespread slushing operations co- ordinated by H. T. Montague Bell. (David Irving, Churchills War (Vol.1), p. 64).The FOCUS made contact with Churchill in April, 1936. Around the same time Churchill begandeveloping contacts with the Soviet Union, in spite of the fact that he had previously denouncedBolshevism and had declared that the Jews had gripped the Russian people by the hair of theirheads and [had] become practically the undisputed masters of that enormousempire... (previously quoted).Hitler had stated repeatedly in Mein Kampf and elsewhere that he did not want war with Britainbut rather sought an alliance between the Third Reich and the British Empire which mighteventually include the United States.Hitler stated that Germany could not rebuild its economy on the basis of a currency backed bygold because it did not have any. Germany was forced into making the remarkable discovery thata nations currency could be based on the productive capability of its workers. In National-Socialist Germany, money was regarded as a receipt for goods produced or services rendered.Such receipts could be passed along and used as currency. In fact they WERE currency andenabled the economic restoration of Germany from the economic chaos of the post-war years andthe Great Depression. We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency coverage of gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a marks worth of work done or goods produced. . . .we laugh at the time our national financiers held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a state bank. -Adolf Hitler, 1937 (CC Veith, Citadels of Chaos, Meador, 1949.) And it proved sound. It worked. In less than ten years Germany became easily the most powerful state in Europe. It worked so magically and magnificently that it sounded the death knell of the entire (Zionist) Jewish money system. World Jewry knew that they had to destroy Hitlers system, by whatever means might prove necessary, or their own would necessarily die. And if it died, with it must die their dream and their hope of making themselves masters of the world. The primary issue over which World War II was fought was to determine which money system was to survive. At bottom it was not a
23. war between Germany and the so-called allies. Primarily it was war to the death between Germany and the International Money Power. --William Gayley Simpson, Which Way Western Man (p.642)Whenever you hear words like “X the new Hitler”, where X is the latest individual or country totake a stand against the Jew, you can know with 99% certainty that whoever speaks those wordsis an agent of Zion and is promoting a war on behalf of Jewish world domination.George Lincoln Rockwell provided an historical perspective on Hitler and World War II in whichhe compares that war to the Alamo in which a few brave Americans held off a numericallysuperior Mexican force long enough for effective resistance to be mounted against the Mexicaninvasion. Though they were defeated and died they made possible a future victory. In 1932, when the conspirators managed to get Franklin Roosevelt and his Jewish gang into the White House, they planned an open takeover for their Communist world revolution. America had been lied to, primed with a terrible depression, and sold the Roosevelt bill- of- goods. It would have been a cinch. But the monkey wrench in their machinery of world revolution was Germany, which was the key to the control of Europe. Unless Germany could be seized, or at least rendered powerless (as it now has been), world Communist victory would be impossible. At the last moment, a strong man arose and seized the initiative from the scheming Jews. Adolf Hitler managed to win back to sanity and honor so many millions of good German people that the weak government was forced to give Hitler legal power, by the will of the people. Adolf Hitler fought the Alamo of the White Race. He held off the colored forces of racial suicide, the forces of Communism, the forces of arrogant Zionism, and the forces of international money-manipulation long enough for a few men like myself to wipe the Jewish cobwebs out of our brains and start the long battle to awaken our people and free them from the menacing spectre of Jewish and colored world tyranny. Hitler purchased, with his own life and the lives of millions of young German men, the precious time for us to be able to wake up and organize to resist the Jews and Negroes, just as Crockett and his men purchased with their lives the time for General Sam Houston to organize to resist the Mexicans. ( White Power, p. 238-9 by George Lincoln Rockwell [emphasis added])
24. Zionist Control of the Media THE PRESS, WHICH, WITH A FEW EXCEPTIONS THAT MAY BE DISREGARDED, IS ALREADY ENTIRELY IN OUR [the Jews] HANDS. ( The Protocols of Zion 7:5) NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR [the Jews] CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we [the Jews] dictate to them. ( The Protocols of Zion 12:4) If already now we [Jews] have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY [non-Jew] communities to such an extent the they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses... ( The Protocols of Zion 12:5)Jews own or control a disproportionate amount of the news and entertainment media in theworld! That includes newspapers, TV networks, film studies and distribution, cable systems,publishing houses, news wire companies, music studios and distribution, Internet companies, andtelecommunication companies. Such control gives Jews the capacity to influence public opinionon almost any issue. Government broadcasting companies such as the Canadian BroadcastingCorporation (CBC) and the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) have Jews throughout theirrespective organizations from Jews at the top down to the production level. THERE IS NO GREATER POWER in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control Americas mass media of news and entertainment. Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It is the power that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated. The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us what to think about that image. Essentially everything we know—or think we know—about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio, or our television. (Who Rules America?)
25. Zionism and Despotic Capitalism All the wheels of the machinery of all States go by the force of the engine, which is in our [the Jews] hands, and that engine of the machinery of States is - Gold. The science of political economy invented by our learned elders has for long past been giving royal prestige to capital. Capital, [...], must be free to establish a monopoly of industry and trade: this is already being put in execution by an unseen hand in all quarters of the world. This freedom will give political force to those engaged in industry, and that will help to oppress the people. (The Protocols of Zion, 5:6-7) The first precept of success in making government loans lies in “creating a demand”, that is, by taking part in the creation of financial panics, depressions, famines, wars and revolutions. The overwhelming success of the Rothschilds lay in their willingness to do what had to be done. (Eustace Mullins, THE WORLD ORDER, A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism , 1985, Ezra Pound Institute of Civilization) We [the Jews] appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces - Socialists, Anarchists, Communists - to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our SOCIAL MASONRY. The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labor of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy, and strong. We are interested in just the opposite - in the diminution, the KILLING OUT OF THE GOYIM [non-Jews]. (The Protocols of Zion, 3:7) Though the fact that the Jew Capitalists are the London Money Power, a grand Imperialism of Capital, has never been thought of before, yet thoughtful observers have noticed the rapid rise of the Jews into astonishing wealth. (L . B . WOOLFOLK, The Great Red Dragon: The London Money Power, 1890)In the above cited work, Woolfolk discusses how many of the big names of American capitalismcontrolled very little wealth on their own but were rather front men for the London MoneyPower, dominated by the House of Rothschild. He refers to the London Money Power as TheRothschild Syndicate. Even in the beginning of this second era of the growth of the Money Power, it realized immense profits—profits so great as enabled the Money Kings to loan the money necessary on both sides to sustain the immense armaments of the wars of the French revolution . They let the British government and the powers warring against France have all the money they required ; and they supplied to Napoleon and his allies the loans necessary for his campaigns. At that time, for the convenience of the Money Kings, the great house of Rothschild was
26. established . The rise of the house of Rothschild has always been shrouded in the mystery that veils all the operations of the Money Power . The house took immense contracts on both sides ; and made to both sides immense loans . Where the money came from has always been a mystery . The common explanation given of it is wholly inadequate to account for the sudden rise of the house of Rothschild into such enormous wealth . The only way to account for it is to suppose that the Rothschild family was chosen by the Jew Money Kings as the head and fiscal agency of a grand Jewish syndicate formed at that time, to concentrate under one management the money of the Jew capitalists. (The Great Red Dragon, p. 11-12.)Concerning their promotion of monopoly capitalism, Woolfolk, writing in 1890, states: It is manifest that the Standard Oil Company is not an American corporation . The method and the extent of its operations show that it is an enterprise of the Money Kings [The Rothschild Syndicate] . For the Standard Oil Company is operating in Russia as largely as in the United States . It owns hundreds of millions of acres of Russian oil lands, and is supplying the neighboring markets from those oil wells, just as it is supplying the American markets from the oil wells of Pennsylvania . The Standard Oil Company, like all the monopolies of the Money Kings, is world- wide in its operations . Unlimited capital behind it enables it to construct facilities for carrying on its business,—a grand pipe line from the oil wells to the seaboard—grand refineries tank cars for transportation of refined oil,these and other things gave it such advantages as enabled it to put down all competition and maintain a monopoly of the business . It evidently aims to secure a monopoly of the oil trade for centuries to come. (The Great Red Dragon, p. 41.)Free Enterprise is based on the idea of private property and the right to use that property as onesees fit. Within a State governed by the right to private property a person can spend his/her entireincome or save a portion of it. That person can then use the accumulated savings to start abusiness. That business can then succeed or fail depending on the skill of the business owner.Sometimes businesses were started from the sale of inherited property or other assets. That wasfor the most part the way the Free Enterprise system worked until the beginning of the lastcentury. The capital was owned by the business owner in the form of buildings, land, machinery,and sometimes patents on the products produced. A very good example of this was Henry Fordwho built up a large and successful business from scratch. He was the classic self-made man.Capital was generated internally by the growing business. Sometimes bank loans were involvedbut it was still the internal generation of capital within the business itself that was used to repaythe loans.The Stock Exchange changed much of this. Businesses are often started in the same way as smallefforts on the part of enterprising individuals. At some point, in order to compete successfullythrough economy of scale, businesses require additional capital which cannot be generatedinternally or secured through loans. They are then faced with the choice of going to a capitalsource for assistance such as venture capital or the Stock Exchange. In either case, the business issurrendering at least part of its control to the venture capitalists or Stock Exchange and exposes
27. the previously privately owned business to speculative pressures. Stock Exchange capital putsland and industry on a speculative basis.If a company makes an initial public offering (IPO) and becomes listed on the exchange thatcompany is surrendering at least part of the control to the eventual shareholders in the company.The original owners can decide to purchase a controlling share of the company and preserveownership but its activities must henceforth be in line with the rules for publicly tradedcompanies. In many jurisdictions it is mandatory for a publicly traded company to maximizeshareholder value above all other considerations. This is viewed as a means to protectshareholders investments but it has implications.A man like Henry Ford could take into account the well being of his employees. He could givethem a Christmas bonus if he felt like it. That would not be possible if his company had been (atthat time) publicly traded and operating under the current rules. It would have reducedshareholder value. It would even be against the law. For someone who works for a publiclytraded company and has the impression that he is working for an insatiably greedy entity, he is! Itis required by law. It is called maximizing shareholder value. If a publicly traded company seemsto be operating against the best interest of its workers and the nation as a whole, it is! It is calledmaximizing shareholder value. If a company is sending jobs overseas or employing cheap laborat home in the form of illiterate (often illegal) immigrants it is often just maximizing shareholdervalue.International Stock Exchange capitalism is the driving force (at least on the economic level)behind globalism and the destruction of national economies. One of the not-too-often mentionedtopics that Hitler discusses in Mein Kampf is the question of Stock Exchange Capitalism versusFree Enterprise. He foresaw the advent of globalism latent in International Stock Exchangecapitalism. He saw that Marxist agitation against capitalism was merely a disguise to cover itsattack against the national economy. Scarcely has the new class grown out of the general economic shift than the Jew, clearly and distinctly, realizes that it can open the way for his own further advancement. First, he used the bourgeoisie as a battering-ram against the feudal world, then the worker against the bourgeois world. If formerly he knew how to swindle his way to civil rights in the shadow of the bourgeoisie, now he hopes to find the road to his own domination in the workers struggle for existence. From now on the worker has no other task but to fight for the future of the Jewish people. Unconsciously he is harnessed to the service of the power which he thinks he is combating. He is seemingly allowed to attack capital, and this is the easiest way of making him fight for it. In this the Jew keeps up an outcry against international capital and in truth he means the national economy which must be demolished in order that the international stock exchange can triumph over its dead body. -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Ch. 11 (Manheim translation)
28. The Judeo-Masonic Plutocracy GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery. (The Protocols of Zion, 4:2) To strengthen his political position [the Jew] tries to tear down the racial and civil barriers which for a time continues to restrain him at every step. To this end he fights with all the tenacity innate in him for religious tolerance and in Freemasonry, which has succumbed to him completely, [in which] he has an excellent instrument with which to fight for his aims and put them across. The governing circles and the higher strata of the political and economic bourgeoisie are brought into his nets by the strings of Freemasonry, and never need to suspect what is happening. - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Ch. 11 (Manheim translation)The origin of Freemasonry is quite controversial. In the Middle Ages in Europe, stone masonswere organized in guilds and had the rights to travel from region to region because their skillswere in such demand. They eventually established lodges where they would stay until their workin that area was finished and then move on. Such lodges became centers of social activity - mensclubs, so to speak. Masons who actually worked in stone later came to be known as operativemasons. Men who were not operative masons envied their social clubs and wanted to join. Thusbegan the formation of lodges consisting of speculative masons, or Freemasons, lodge memberswho were not actually part of the profession of stone cutting and setting.According to Wikipedia: Freemasonry is a fraternal organization that arose from obscure origins (theorized to be anywhere from the time of the building of King Solomons Temple to the mid-1600s). Freemasonry now exists in various forms all over the world, and has millions of members. The various forms all share moral and metaphysical ideals, which include, in most cases, a constitutional declaration of belief in a Supreme Being.... Freemasonry uses the metaphors of operative stonemasons tools and implements, against the allegorical backdrop of the building of King Solomons Temple, to convey what is most generally defined as "a system of morality veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols." LinkFreemasons were very influential in early America. Among the signers of the Declaration ofIndependence were nine confirmed Masons and a number of others who membership isconjectural.
29. The confirmed masons were:William Ellery (RI), Benjamin Franklin (PA), John Hancock (MA), Joseph Hewes (NC),William Hooper (NC), Robert Treat Paine (MA), Richard Stockton (NJ), George Walton (GA),William Whipple (NH). LinkThough many people believe that America was founded as a Christian country, availableevidence strongly suggests that it was founded as a Masonic republic. The architecture ofWashington, DC would support that contention.The development of Freemasonry in Europe and elsewhere is closely related to the history of theJews in Western Europe. The Jews were expelled from England in 1290 AD by Edward I. Manyof them took refuge in Holland. The Jews were also expelled from Spain in 1492 by QueenIsabella. Many of those also went to Holland.Those who went to Holland were eventually followed by many Marranos, Spanish Jews who hadconverted to Catholicism under duress: In Amsterdam, the Marranos did not arrive until around 1590, some 11 years after the Union of Utrecht (1579) and the birth of the United Provinces of the Netherlands as a Protestant state. Here, too, they had to wait until 1615 before Jewish settlement was officially authorized, but the Marranos in Amsterdam differed from those in other Protestant countries in that they openly practiced Judaism almost from the moment of their arrival. Thanks to the Marranos, Amsterdam became one of the greatest Jewish centers in the world in the 17th century; ...Amsterdam even became known as "the Dutch Jerusalem." (Link)England endured a civil war in three stages between 1641 and 1652. The outcome was OliverCromwell as Lord Protector of an English republic. Under the guidance of Oliver Cromwell arelationship was attempted with Dutch Jews: The commercial policy which led to the Navigation Act in October 1651, made Oliver Cromwell desirous of attracting the rich Jews of Amsterdam to London so that they might
30. transfer their important trade interests with the Spanish Main from Holland to England. The mission of Oliver St John to Amsterdam, though failing to establish a coalition between English and Dutch commercial interests as an alternative to the Navigation Act, had negotiated with Menasseh Ben Israel and the Amsterdam community. A pass was granted to Menasseh to enter England, but he was unable to use it because of the war between England and Holland, which lasted from 1652 to 1654. LinkThe Jews of Holland (previously Spain) had a long history in Babylon/Persia. They had beenexpelled from Palestine in 586 BC and went into exile in Babylon. Most remained there evenwhen after a few decades they were allowed to return to Palestine. The Jews in Babylon/Persiahad their own community organization of which the leaders were descendants of king David. Following the conquest of Judah by Babylon, and the exile of its population, the Babylonian Exilarchate was established. The highest official of Babylonian Jewry was the exilarch (Reish Galuta, "Head of the Captivity"). Those who held the position traced their ancestry to the House of David in the male line. The position holder was regarded as a king-in-waiting. [emphasis added] (Link). [The final exilarch fell from power in 1040 AD. (Link)]It was in Babylon that the Talmud, the written form of the oral tradition of the Jewish sages waswritten (there was also a Palestinian Talmud but it has much less authority within Judaism). Alsoin Babylon there developed a mysticism over many centuries derived from many sources(Jewish, Egyptian, Greek, Babylonian, etc) and which incorporates astrology, sacred geometry,and numerology ultimately distilled into written form in the Cabbala. Jews left Babylon/Persia insignificant numbers between the 11th and 14th centuries and migrated through North Africa, manyof them eventually reaching Spain.When the Jews arrived in Spain they brought with them not only their Talmudic and Cabbalisticbeliefs but also the Davidic bloodline. In 1492 they were given a choice to either leave Spain orconvert to Catholicism. Among the converts (Marranos) who stayed were some who began theAlumbrado sect to preserve and practice their beliefs secretly. In 1492, the Alumbrado (The Enlightened) movement was founded by Spanish Marranos (baptised Jews who secretly kept their Talmudic faith) and a similar organisation was founded in France in 1623 – "Guerients" who changed their name to Illuminati in 1722. (Jüri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, 2002, p. 18)The Spanish Inquisition was in large measure an attempt to suppress the Alumbrado sect. Manyfled Spain and sought refuge in France, Holland, and Germany. When Jews re-entered Englandduring Cromwells rule as Lord Protector, at least some of them were almost certainly membersof the Alumbrado sect. They began re-entering England around 1655. So, England had enjoyedfreedom from Jews for 365 years - a year of years. During that time England enjoyed the GoldenAge of the Renaissance during the Elizabethan Era. Toward the middle of the seventeenth century a considerable number of Marrano
31. merchants settled in London and formed there a secret congregation, at the head of which was Antonio Fernandez Carvajal. They conducted a large business with the Levant, East and West Indies, Canary Islands, and Brazil, and above all with the Netherlands, Spain, and Portugal. They formed an important link in the network of trade spread especially throughout the Spanish and Portuguese world by the Marranos or secret Jews. LinkWithin 60 years the first Masonic lodges were beginning to appear in Britain. Initially no Judaicinfluence was evident. However, within another 50 years the influence became clear. Coat of Arms 1.This coat of arms shows the various symbols of Freemasonry, the set square and compass in themiddle and bottom, the hand holding the trowel at the top and the three towers understood to bethe products of the craft. This is the coat of arms of the original form of speculative masonry(Freemasonry). It was the coat of arms of The London Company of Masons and was adopted asthe coat of arms of the original Grand Lodge. Coat of Arms 2.
32. The second coat of arms (previous page, Link) shows a much stronger Judaic influence. We stillsee the tools of the craft, the set square and compass at the bottom but no longer in the middle.Instead we see four creatures. There is a lion, an ox (or bull), a man, and an eagle. These areusually taken to represent the four creatures prominent in the book of Ezekiel of the HebrewBible. We also see the Ark of the Covenant at the top, an important symbol from the HebrewBible. The two creatures at the left and right are cherubim, half man and half calf but with wingsinstead of arms. We also see two smaller versions of the same guarding the Ark. In some versionsof this coat of arms there is also Hebrew writing above the Ark and sometimes also at the bottom.The prominence of the four creatures of Ezekiel suggests that the book of Ezekiel had taken onparamount importance in this branch of Freemasonry. The main theme of that book is therestoration of the Davidic monarchy and the building of the third temple. It should be noted thatEzekiel predicts a dynasty of kings (descendants of king David) who will preside over a(presumably) world-wide theocracy.Eventually the two branches of British Freemasonry merged and formed the United Grand Lodgewhich adopted the coat of arms similar to that shown below (Link). The lions around the edge ofthe crest were requested by King George V to represent the British royal family. The motto at thebottom means “listen, watch, and remain silent”. Coat of Arms 3.When Jews re-entered Britain following 1655 they married their daughters into British noblefamilies. The offspring would then be Jews (having Jewish mothers) but have British names,customs, contacts and upbringing. They would be part of the British nobility. Membership inMasonic lodges contributed to their upward mobility.
33. The Role of Freemasonry in The Zionist New World Order Masonic Square and Compass SymbolThe GOYIM [non-Jews] are a flock of sheep, and we [Jews] are their wolves. And youknow what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock? ....There is another reason alsowhy they will close their eyes: for we shall keep promising them to give back all theliberties we have taken away as soon as we have quelled the enemies of peace and tamedall parties ....It is not worth to say anything about how long a time they will be keptwaiting for this return of their liberties ....For what purpose then have we invented thiswhole policy and insinuated it into the minds of the GOY without giving them any chanceto examine its underlying meaning? For what, indeed, if not in order to obtain in aroundabout way what is for our scattered tribe unattainable by the direct road? It is thiswhich has served as the basis for our organization of SECRET MASONRY WHICHIS NOT KNOWN TO, AND AIMS WHICH ARE NOT EVEN SO MUCH ASSUSPECTED BY, THESE "GOY" CATTLE, ATTRACTED BY US INTO THE"SHOW" ARMY OF MASONIC LODGES IN ORDER TO THROW DUST IN THEEYES OF THEIR FELLOWS.(The Protocols of Zion, 11:4-9)GENTILE masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of actionof our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknownmystery. (The Protocols of Zion, 4:2)Nowadays, [...] the people have fallen into the grips of merciless money-grindingscoundrels who have laid a pitiless and cruel yoke upon the necks of the workers. We [theJews] appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression when wepropose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces - Socialists, Anarchists,Communists - to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherlyrule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our SOCIAL MASONRY. (The Protocols ofZion, 3:7)
34. In 1776, the same year that the US Declaration of Independence was signed, the Illuminati wasbeing formed in Europe as a Jewish plan to infiltrate Masonic lodges and direct them down thepath of Jew-Bolshevik revolution and social upheaval. In 1743 a goldsmith named Amschel Moses Bauer opened a coin shop in Frankfurt, Germany. He hung above his door a sign depicting a Roman eagle on a red shield. The shop became known as the Red Shield firm. The German word for red shield is Rothschild. Amschel Bauer had a son, Mayer Amschel Bauer. At a very early age Mayer showed that he possessed immense intellectual ability, and his father spent much of his time teaching him everything he could about the money lending business and in the basic dynamics of finance. A few years after his fathers death in 1755, Mayer went to work in Hannover as a clerk, in a bank, owned by the Oppenheimers. While in the employ of the Oppenheimers, he was introduced to a General von Estorff for whom he ran errands. Mayers superior ability was quickly recognized and his advancement within the firm was swift. He was awarded a junior partnership. Von Estorff would later provide the yet-to-be formed House of Rothschild an entré into to the palace of Prince William. His success allowed him the means to return to Frankfurt and to purchase the business his father had established in 1743. The big Red Shield was still displayed over the door. Recognizing the true significance of the Red Shield (his father had adopted it as his emblem from the Red Flag which was the emblem of the revolutionary minded Jews in Eastern Europe), Mayer Amschel Bauer changed his name to Rothschild (red shield). It was at this point that the House of Rothschild came into being. LinkMayer Rothschild realized that loaning money to governments was much more profitable than loaningit to individuals. The loans were bigger and the collateral was the country itself and the tax base of itscitizens.Mayer had five sons: Amschel, Salomon, Nathan, Karl and Jakob. Mayer devoted himself for the restof his life to instructing his sons in the techniques of finance. As the sons grew older Mayer sent themto the major capitals of Europe to open branch offices of the Rothschild banking business with Amschelin Frankfurt, Salomon in Vienna, Nathan in London, Karl in Naples, and Jakob in Paris. Nathanestablished close ties between the House of Rothschild and the Bank of England.In the year 1776, Adam Weishaupt began the Illuminati sect. He was a former Jesuit who had left theCatholic Church. In reality, he was a Jew and a descendant of Spanish Marranos (Jews who pretendedto be Catholics). Weishaupt was supported in his endeavors by Mayer Amschel Bauer who changed hisname to Red Shield (Rothschild). It was Mayer Amschel Rothschild who convinced Weishaupt to wholly accept the Frankist Cabbalist doctrine and who afterwards financed the Illuminati. Rothschild had given Weishaupt the task of re- establishing the old Alumbrado [Illuminist] movement for the [Spanish] Cabbalist
35. Jews. [Rothschild and Weishaupt were particularly interested in drawing Spanish Jews, expelled from Spain in 1492, into their circle because they had knowledge of the Davidic bloodline throughout a sojourn in what had been Babylon lasting over twenty centuries from the 6th century BC to the 14th century AD. - ed.] Jakob Frank (actually Leibowicz) was born in 1726, in Polish Galicia. He officially converted to Catholicism but this was just camouflage. Jakob Frank was jailed in 1760 for continuing to teach the Cabbala (Zohar) and for practicing secret Jewish rituals. In 1773, the Russians attacked the region of Poland where Frank was held prisoner. He was released and moved to Offenbach (near Frankfurt am Main) in Germany where he began to lead a luxurious and wild life. His deeds were evil, his personality nefarious. This information comes from Professor Gershom G. Scholems books "Cabbala" (New York and Scarborough1974), Sabbatai Zevi" (New Jersey, 1973) and "The Messianic Idea in Judaism"(New York, 1971). Jakob Frank summed up his doctrine in his book "The Words of the Lord". He asserted that the creator God was not the same as the one who had revealed himself to the Israelites. He believed God was evil. Frank proclaimed himself as the true Messiah [in spite of his non-Davidic ancestry – ed.]. He vowed not to tell the truth, rejected every moral law, and declared that the only way to a new society was through the total destruction of the present civilization. Murder, rape, incest and the drinking of blood were perfectly acceptable actions and necessary rituals. (Jüri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, 2002, p. 19-20)The Illuminati sect had as its goal the infiltration of Masonic lodges for the purpose of directing themalong revolutionary paths but, most of all, along paths favored by Rothschild. The ultimate goal wasworld conquest through the power of Jewish gold! Adam Weishaupt was born February 6, 1748 at Ingoldstadt, Bavaria. Weishaupt, born a Jew, was educated by the Jesuits who converted him to Catholicism. He purportedly developed an intense hatred for the Jesuits. Although he became a Catholic priest, his faith had been shaken by the Jesuits and he became an atheist. Weishaupt was an ardent student of French philosopher Voltaire (1694-1778). Voltaire, a revolutionary who held liberal religious views, had written in a letter to King Frederick II, ("the Great"): "Lastly, when the whole body of the Church should be sufficiently weakened and infidelity strong enough, the final blow (is) to be dealt by the sword of open, relentless persecution. A reign of terror (is) to be spread over the whole earth, and...continue while any Christian should be found obstinate enough to adhere to Christianity." It is believed that, as a result of Voltaires writings, Weishaupt formulated his ideas concerning the destruction of the Church. In 1775, when summoned by the House of Rothschild, he immediately defected and, at the behest of Mayer, began to organize the Illuminati. The 1st chapter of the order started in his home town of Ingolstadt. Link In 1785, Mayer moved his entire family to a five story dwelling he shared with the Schiff family. In 1865 The Schiffs not-yet-born grandson Jacob would move to New York and in 1917 become the mastermind behind the funding of the Bolshevik Revolution. This action would successfully instate communism as a major world movement, which was, (and still is), a basic tenet of the Illuminati and their collectivist agenda [...] . From this point on the Rothschilds and the Schiffs would play a central role in the rest of European financial history, and subsequently
36. that of the United States and the world. LinkThe Illuminati founded by Rothschild and Weishaupt can be regarded as the secret masonry withinFreemasonry referred to in the The Protocols of Zion 11:7. The Illuminati sect was banned in Bavaria in1784. The House of Rothschild, however, continued to grow in wealth and power. The Illuminatieventually resurfaced under various disguises. One such was The Sons of the Covenant (Bnai Brith)established in New York in 1843. Soviet archives (opened in the 1990s) have revealed that the BnaiBrith was supreme over all Masonic lodges in Russia and was behind the Bolshevik Revolutions in1905 (which failed) and in 1917 (which succeeded). The Soviet commissars, mostly Jews, wereresponsible for the torture and deaths of millions of White ethnic Russians and Ukrainians during thefirst few decades of the Soviet regime. [T]he October 1917 Revolution (really a just a well-organized, well-carried out Jewish coup) was dominated by Jewish agitators (a documented fact) but so was the 1905 Revolution[...]. We also learn from the grand old man [Alexander Solzhenitsyn] the awe-inspiring extent of the Jewish domination of the Soviet Union during its first two decades of existence, including its ruthless and murderous internal security system: Tcheka, OGPU, NKGB, and NKVD. A Russian in the hands of the Tcheka, etc. was almost certain to be in the hands of Jewish torturers and executioners. The litany of Jewish crimes committed against the long-suffering Russians (and other Slavic peoples: Ukrainians and Belarussians) and coldly listed by the author is simply nauseating and one should approach both volumes on an empty stomach. (Review of Alexander Solzhenitsyns Two Hundred Years Together by Friedrich Braun. Link) Trotsky (Jew), Peoples Commissar for Foreign Affairs, Peoples Commissar of War, and Politburo memberA Masonic conference was held in 1910 in Copenhagen where the agenda was to discuss how toturn Europe into a communist state (Franz Weissin, Der Weg zum Sozialismus / The Way toSocialism, Munich, 1930, p. 9.). Lenin and Trotsky were both in attendance. Lenin was aFreemason of the 31st degree (Grand Inspecteur Inquisiteur Commandeur) and a member of thelodge Art et Travail in Switzerland and France. (Oleg Platonov, Russia’s Crown of Thorns: TheSecret History of Freemasonry, Moscow, 2000, part II, p. 417.) Leiba Bronstein (Trotsky)became a Freemason in 1897 and later a high-ranking Illuminatus through his friend AlexanderParvus. Trotsky also maintained contacts with B’nai B’rith. Jacob Schiff, chairman of the
37. banking house Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and a minion of the Rothschilds, took care of the contactsbetween the “revolutionary movement in Russia” and B’nai B’rith. (Gerald B. Winrod,Adam Weishaupt - A Human Devil, p. 47.) Trotsky became a member of B’Nai Brith in New Yorkin 1917. (Yuri Begunov, Secret Forces in the History of Russia, St. Petersburg, 1995, pp.138-139) Trotsky reached the conclusion that the true purpose of freemasonry was to eliminate the national states and their cultures and to introduce a Judaised world state. This is also stated in “The Secret Initiation into the 33rd Degree”: “Freemasonry is nothing more and nothing less than revolution in action; continuous conspiracy.” Bronstein [Trotsky] became a convinced internationalist who […] learned that the Jewish people were their own collective Messiah and would reach dominion over all peoples through the mixing of the other races and elimination of national boundaries. An international republic was to be created, where the Jews would be the ruling element, since no others would be able to understand and control the masses. (Jüri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, 2002, p. 133) It has been claimed that Lenin was the brain of the revolution and Trotsky the soul. What a monstrous soul! He wrought immense havoc on Russia in order to subdue its inhabitants. While the Trotskyists claimed that their teacher never wove any intrigues, we can by the aid of documents and his own quotes confirm that Trotsky was a particularly nasty Sadist who destroyed everything of value and finally became a simple idiot, a cunning demagogue and an unfortunate criminal who died horribly. Trotsky was without doubt the cruellest and most dangerous “revolutionary” in the world, who ordered literally millions of Russians to be shot. He took children as hostages and, if necessary, ordered them murdered. It was Trotsky who released criminals from the prisons and thereby also terrorised the people. Trotsky was a hard, cold devil, as the Swedish historian Peter Englund (once an active Trotskyist) characterised him. (Expressen, 21st of August 1990.) He had so much satanic evil in him that everything we learned about the inquisition of the Middle Ages pales in comparison. The brutal Trotsky successfully developed the violent traditions of the Jacobins. (Jüri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, 2002, p. 175)The B’nai Brith was directly responsible for the overthrow of Czar Nicholas II and thesubsequent decades of mass murder (the “second phase”) which followed: In the archives of the State Department there is a document, No.861.00/5339, which reveals how Jacob Schiff, who was a very influential person within the Masonic organisation B’nai B’rith, and his companions Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff, Isaac Seligman and others had made plans as early as 1916 to overthrow the Russian Tsar. In April 1917 Jacob Schiff himself officially confirmed that it was through his financial aid to the revolutionaries that the Tsar had been forced to abdicate, whereupon a Masonic government came into power (Gary Allen, None Dare Call it Conspiracy, 1971). At the same time, Alexander Kerensky received one million dollars
38. from Jacob Schiff. (Encyclopedia of Jewish Knowledge, article “Schiff, New York, 1938.) In the spring of 1917, Jacob Schiff began to finance Leon Trotsky to implement “the second phase of the revolution”, according to Dr Antony C. Sutton. Colonel Edward M. House, a powerful Illuminatus in America, saw to it that President Woodrow Wilson quickly had an American passport issued for Trotsky, so that he could go back to Russia and continue the “revolution”. In New York, on the 27th of March 1917, the 37-year-old Trotsky, with his family and 275 international terrorists and adventurers embarked on the ship Kristianiajjord bound for Europe to complete the “revolution” in Russia. Various criminals, Jewish-American communists and brokers from Wall Street also accompanied them. (Jüri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, 2002, p. 148)The B’nai Brith made sure the Jewish ‘revolutionaries’ were well trained for the work of massmurder that lay ahead of them: Parvus and Trotsky were given plenty of aid from the United States, where the Jewish millionaire Jacob Schiff even in 1890 organised and financed training for Jewish “revolutionaries” from Russia. It was B’nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant), the Jewish Masonic organisation, that planned the instruction for those training courses. The same order also played an active role in the so-called revolution in 1905. (The Ugly Truth About the ADL, Washington, 1992, p. 27.)Writing in 1924 about the Jewish rulers of Communist Russia, Adolf Hitler stated in Mein Kampf: It must never be forgotten that the present rulers of Russia are blood-stained criminals, that here we have the dregs of humanity which, favoured by the circumstances of a tragic moment, overran a great State , degraded and extirpated [abwürgte und ausrottete; i.e. slaughtered and wiped out] millions of educated people out of sheer blood-lust, and that now for nearly ten years they have ruled with such a savage tyranny as was never known before. It must not be forgotten that these rulers belong to a people in whom the most bestial cruelty is allied with a capacity for artful mendacity and believes itself to-day more than ever called to impose its sanguinary despotism on the rest of the world. It must not be forgotten that the international Jew, who is to-day the absolute master of Russia, [...looks upon Germany...] as a State condemned to the same doom as Russia. -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 2, Ch. 14 (Murphey translation)The Bnai Brith was also behind the Young Turk Revolution in Turkey which led to the Armeniangenocide during WWI.
39. Emmanuel Carasso, lawyer and Jewish Italian B’nai B’rith official, was a founder of the ‘Young Turks’One of the founders of the Young Turks (Committee for Union and Progress) was a Jewish ItalianB’nai B’rith official named Emmanuel Carasso who set up the Young Turk secret society in the1890s in Salonika (now in Greece but then a city in the Ottoman Empire). Most of the Young“Turks” were in fact Jews and this was a well known fact. The Jews used Freemasonry as a tool. In conformity with the Jewish plans revealed in The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in 1905, Jewish leaders met in Masonic lodges in Salonika, Italy, Paris and Vienna, and plotted a coup d’état against the Sultan of Turkey Abdul Hamid II. Jews and crypto- Jewish Dönmeh of the Committee for Union and Progress took control of the Turkish Empire in 1909. They had several goals. Their primary objective was to establish a segregated “Jewish State” in Palestine. They also sought to instigate World War I, to slaughter entire Christian populations, and to destroy the Turkish Empire and supplant Islamic religion and culture with a soulless and cultureless society [communism] engineered by Jewish positivists in Vienna, Paris, Italy and Salonika . (Link, p. 4 ) The so-called “Young Turk Revolution” was actually a Jewish takeover, not a revolution, and was similar to the “Bolshevik Revolution” that would later take place in Russia in 1917, and involved some of the same key Jewish players. Both so-called “revolutions” were planned, funded and carried out by Jews and crypto- Jews*. Both Jewish takeovers fulfilled ancient Jewish prophecies, which call upon Jews to discredit and destroy Gentile government, religion and culture; to kill off the Gentile intelligentsia; and to establish a segregated Jewish State from Egypt to Iraq [Greater Israel], from which the Jews are to rule the World with a World Government led by a Jewish King in Jerusalem (Genesis 15:18-21; 17:8. Exodus 34:11, 24. Deuteronomy 1:7-8; 6:10-11; 11:24-28. Joshua 1:3-4). (Link, p. 58)*Jews often engage in a form of biological mimicry. In order to infiltrate a host population and conceal theiridentities while remaining Jews, they have their daughters marry male members of the host population. Theoffspring are Jews since the mother is a Jew (a Jew is someone with a Jewish mother). However, the offspringhave the name, manners, appearance, and sometimes the religion of the father thus enabling them to advance asJews within the host population while remaining less obvious as Jews. Sometimes Jews convert to the religion ofthe majority out of convenience or necessity. Such was the case with the Marranos of Spain and the Dönmehwithin the Ottoman Empire.
40. The Illuminati evolved over the course of centuries (from 586 BC onwards) within the Jewishcommunity in Babylon/Persia. It was brewed in the vat of Talmudic and Cabbalistic beliefs. Itsleader was the head of Jewry in Babylon/Peria, was known as the Exilarch, and was at all timesover the centuries the patriarch of the House of David, being in direct descent along the male linefrom King David through his son Solomon. The Exilarchate had already established a branchoffice in southern France by 759 AD with Makhir of Narbonne as “prince” and client ofCharlemagne. A document from 1161 AD states: Then King Charles sent to the King of Baghdad [Caliph] requesting that he dispatch one of his Jews of the seed of royalty of the House of David. He hearkened and sent him one from there, a magnate and sage, Rabbi Makhir by name. (Link)“The Makhir family enjoyed for centuries many privileges and that its members bore the title ofnasi (prince).” (Link)When Jews migrated out of Babylon/Persia between the 10th and 14th centuries many foundtheir way to Spain via North Africa. In Spain they were able to live openly as Jews until 1492when an edict of expulsion was issued. Any Jews wishing to remain were required to convert toCatholicism. They became known as Marranos. Among the Marranos a sect was formed, theAlumbrados (illumined ones), to maintain their Jewish traditions secretly. The SpanishInquisition was established in large part to suppress the Alumbrado sect. Many fled Spain andfound their way to France, Holland, Germany, and eventually England.In 1776 Mayer Amschel Bauer (Rothschild) and Adam Weishaupt set about to reorganize andrevitalize the Alumbrado sect, giving it the equivalent Latin name, the Illuminati. During theearly part of the century the Alumbrado had been actively involved in the development ofFreemasonry, giving it its decidedly Jewish character and ritual. That made it very easy for therevitalized Alumbrado/Illuminati established by Rothschild and Weishaupt to infiltrateFreemasonic lodges and become the secret masonry within freemasonry. There is little doubtthat the Alumbrado had in their possession complete genealogies of the Davidic line ofsuccession and that it became a matter of priority to the Illuminati to collect and preserve thatmaterial, investigating it to the last stratum.The Illuminati was banned in Bavaria in 1784 but managed to survive by going underground andtaking refuge in Masonic lodges where they were already fully established. In France theymorphed into the Jacobins who planned and carried out the French revolution. By the mid 19thcentury, the Illuminati had re-established itself under the guise of Communist, Zionist, andAnarchist groups as well as front organizations such as the Bnai Brith. At all times the Illuministorganizations and front groups have been under the financial patronage of the RothschildSyndicate.At present the Illuminati is still the secret Masonry within Freemasonry but also operatesthrough numerous foundations, think tanks, institutes, and planning groups that establishgovernment policies throughout the Western world - all under the guidance and control of theJewish financial oligarchy centered in London, England - the Rothschild Syndicate.
41. Zionist Control of America What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves [the Jews], only the masses of the proletariat, a few [b]illionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers. (The Protocols of Zion, 7:1) The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over City, State, and nation... It seizes in its long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection...(from a speech in 1922 by John Francis Hylan, mayor of New York City. Link)In the years leading up to WWII, Jewish power in America was an intensely controversialsubject. Prominent Americans were vocal critics of what was variously called the money power,the money trust, and other such euphemisms. Some, such as Henry Ford, challenged the Jewpower directly. They all recognized not only the threat posed by Jew control of the financialsystem but Jew control of the culture and the nations politics.The election of JFK (John F. Kennedy) in 1960 brought into The White House a man whosefather had been an open critic of Jewish power in America, Joseph P Kennedy. Joe Kennedy Joseph Patrick “Joe” Kennedy, Sr. (September 6, 1888 – November 18, 1969), was a prominent United States businessman and political figure, the father of President John F. Kennedy and Senators Robert F. Kennedy and Ted Kennedy. He was a leading member of the Democratic Party and of the Irish Catholic community. He served briefly as the US Ambassador to England at the start of World War II. When Fortune magazine published its first list of the richest people in the United States in 1957 it placed him in the $200-400 million band, meaning that it estimated him to be between the ninth and sixteenth richest person in the United States at that time. Wikipedia article Joe Kennedy’s WWII backgroundJoe Kennedy was an admirer of Adolf Hitler and National-Socialism and, furthermore, he was‘anti-Semitic’ possibly due to his conflicts with Jews, notably Meyer Lansky, during thebootlegging prohibition days.On June 13, 1938, Kennedy met with Herbert von Dirksen, the German ambassador in London,who claimed in Berlin that Kennedy had told him that “it was not so much the fact that we wantto get rid of the Jews that was so harmful to us, but rather the loud clamor with which weaccompanied this purpose. [Kennedy] himself fully understood our Jewish policy.” Kennedy’smain concern with such violent acts against German Jews as Kristallnacht was that the



Sabbatean Chronology

lifeinthemix publishing
Sabbatean Frankist-Freemasonic Chronology
The Mystical Jewish Messiah of the 17th century, Sabbatai (Shabbatai) Tzvi, promised to
depose the kings of the earth, unite the ten lost tribes and restore Israel. When Sabbatai
approached the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire he thought that the Sultan would have the
humility to recognise his greatness and humble himself. The Sultan would have met a man
who was clearly greater than himself. Sabbatai would receive the Sultanate and rule the
known world. He originally intended to accomplish these goals overtly, however, when the
Ottoman ruler threatened to kill him rather than hand over his throne, Sabbatai Tzvi
understood that he had to take his messianic movement underground. His goals had to be
achieved with stealth and deception. His movement was labelled “Apostate Messianism”.
Though he would loose the open support of most rabbinic authorities and mainstream
Judaism, his faithful followers would be assigned the task of continuing his mission.
Forty-one years after Sabbatai Tzvi’s physical death, his hidden followers would establish
Freemasonry in England. Freemasonry would continue Sabbatai Tzvi’s agenda of
achieving world rule. Freemasonry linking up with Illuminism has indeed, through
revolution and wars, overthrown the monarchies of the world. Freemasonry/Illuminism has
taken the reins of the Jewish, Catholic (Vatican) and the Islamic world, united the remnant
of the lost tribes through the establishment of the European Union and has “restored”
Israel. The infidel “rabbinic” European Jews who had abandoned Sabbatai Tzvi were
decimated by the Freemasonic Holocaust of World War II. The Masonic State of Israel
would be granted independence by the Masonic United Nations.
1492- Jewish Expulsion from Spain
1492- The first known Illuminati order (Alumbrado) was founded in 1492 by Spanish
Crypto-Jews, called ‘Marranos’.
1494- The first evidence of Jews in Tudor England after the expulsion.
1527- Ignatius Loyola, while studying at Salamanca, was brought before an ecclesiastical
commission on a charge of sympathy with the alumbrados, but escaped with an
1588- The Converso (a Jew or Moor of medieval Spain and Portugal who professed to
convert to Christianity in order to avoid persecution or expulsion) Dr. Hector Nunes was
lauded as a hero for being the first to warn of the sailing of the Spanish Armada.
1589- Christopher Marlowe’s anti-Semitic play, The Jew of Malta, was first performed.
1594- Queen Elizabeth I’s physician, a Converso named Dr. Roderigo Lopez, was
implicated in a plot to assassinate Elizabeth. He was tortured, tried and hanged on what is
suspected to be a false charge of treason. Anglo Jewry then fled to the Low Countries,
often disguised as Spanish or Portuguese Roman Catholics.
1597- William Shakespeare’s famous play about a Jewish moneylender, The Merchant of
Venice, was first acted out.
1604- Mannaseh Ben-Israel born
1609- Portuguese merchants were expelled from London on suspicion of being Jewish
1620- Pilgrims land in America
1626- (9th of Av) Sabbatai Tzvi born in Smyrna (now Izmir), Turkey. He was born to
Mordechai Tzvi, a merchant with close dealings with English merchants.
1639- Sabbatai Tzvi reaches bar-mitzvah (13 years old)
1640- Manasseh Ben-Israel named to head Yeshiva (enabled by the Bankers Perreiras)
enabling him to focus on writings. Manasseh was most profoundly interested in Messianic
problems. He was full of Cabalistic opinions. He entered into correspondence with
Christina, Queen of Sweden, ostensibly regarding matters of Hebrew learning, but
probably with the design of getting her help in obtaining for the Jews admission into
Sweden. But his chief attention was directed to securing the readmission of Jews into
[Antonio de Montezinos, nee Aaron Levi, a 17th century Converso who reclaimed his
Jewish ancestry after fleeing the Inquisition in Portugal, went to Peru in search of a "holy
people" rumoured to be living among the Amazon Indians. On a remote jungle river near
the Ecuadorian border, Montezinos was greeted by a band of light-skinned "Indians" in
dugout canoes. On learning that he was an Israelite from across the seas, the faircomplexioned aborigines recited the "Shema Israel" and announced they were
descendants of the tribe of Reuben. On his return to Amsterdam, Montezinos shared his
discovery with a famous Converso rabbi, Menasseh Ben-Israel, who broadcast the news
on his printing press that the Biblical prophesy had been fulfilled. He predicted that the
scattered tribes of Israel were soon to reunite in Jerusalem to rebuild Solomon's temple
and usher in the Messianic age.]
1647- Oliver Cromwell conspires with Manasseh Ben-Israel’s agent to execute English
King Charles I. [An entry for June 6th 1647, from Oliver Cromwell to an Ebenezer Pratt,
says (in modern language):
"In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England; this, however,
impossible while Charles living, Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate
grounds for which at present do not exist, Therefore, advise that Charles be assassinated,
but will have nothing to do with procuring an assassin, though willing to help with his
Ebenezer Pratt's reply was on July 12th 1647 :
"Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted, assassination too
dangerous. Charles should be given the opportunity to escape, his recapture will then
make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms
until trial commences."
Another trial was ordered by Cromwell because his agreement with his backers in
Amsterdam was that Charles would be executed. The indictment against Charles was
drawn up by Isaac Dorislaus, the agent in England of Manasseh Ben-Israel, one of the
main funders from Amsterdam of the Cromwell 'revolution'."]
1642- Sabbatai began the Kabbalistic meditative discipline “Climbing Sephirotic
Ladder” (The Lost Messiah page 26)
1707- Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzato born. Luzzatto admitted to being influenced by the
writings of Nathan of Gaza, Sabbatai Tzvi's "prophet." He claimed that the positive
elements of Sabbatai Tzvi's teachings could be separated from the “heretical” elements,
but few rabbinic authorities agreed with this opinion, since Sabbateanism was a powerful
wave sweeping over the Jewish community. A bitter controversy ensued concerning the
verity and propriety of Luzzatto's activities and claims. Luzzatto's house was searched and
evidence that he engaged in magical practices was found. He was compelled to cease and
desist from teaching Kabbalah.
1648- Chmielnicki massacres thousands of Jews in Europe
1648- Sabbatai Tzvi’s messianic mission begins with his first messianic vision according to
Sabbatean tradition.
1649- Sabbatai Tzvi 23 years old
1649- Charles I beheaded.
1649- Oliver Cromwell comes to power over England. Cromwell was influenced by Rabbi
Manasseh Ben-Israel of Amsterdam who functioned as a Jewish ambassador to the
1650- Sabbatai’s revelation (The Lost Messiah page 26}
1650- Judah HaChassid (the Pious) was born around 1650 in Poland. He was powerfully
affected by Sabbatai Tzvi. He believed that Sabbatai Tzvi was, in fact, the Messiah. He
expected his second appearance in 1706.
Mid-17th century- A new Converso colony grew in London, made up partly of refugees
from Rouen and the Canary Islands.
1651-1654- Sabbatai thoroughly beaten and driven out of Izmir. It was advised that he be
killed secretly but instead was thoroughly beaten and driven out of Izmir.
1655- In September, Manasseh Ben-Israel moved to London and on October 31 submitted
a seven-point petition to the Council of State calling for the return of Jews to England.
1655- Cromwell called the Whitehall Conference of December 4-18, to discuss Jewish
readmission. Many merchants questioned Cromwell’s ideas and Cromwell angrily
dismissed the conference, resolving to authorise an unofficial readmission of the Jews into
1656- Cromwell’s oral guarantee and the approval of the Council of State allowed the
Conversos of England to practice their faith openly.
1657- Jews immigrate to England from Holland, Spain and Portugal and open a
synagogue. Thus, the new Israelite congregation in England was composed almost
exclusively of Sephardim. The first Jews who received nobility titles in England also were
Sephardim: Solomon de Medina (c. 1650-1730) and Sir Moses Montefiore (1784-1885),
who was knighted in 1837 and made a baronet in 1846.
1657- Manasseh Ben-Israel dies.
1657- Sabbatai Tzvi is 31 years old.
1658- According to Sabbatean tradition, Sabbatai Tzvi atones for sins of Israel. He
receives new laws and new commandments to repair the world.
1659- Sabbatai Tzvi leaves Istanbul and returns to Smyrna (Izmir).
1662- Sabbatai Tzvi leaves Izmir for Jerusalem.
1664- A small congregation of Sephardim was officially recognised by King Charles II after
the Restoration of the Stuart monarchy. Fulfilment of Manasseh Ben-Israel’s Cabalistic
work laying foundation for Messiah’s coming.
1664- Charles II issues a formal written promise of protection and, in 1674 and 1685,
further royal declarations were made confirming that statement. In 1698, the Act for
Suppressing Blasphemy granted recognition to the legality of practicing Judaism in
1665- May 31, 1665 (17th of Sivan of the Hebrew Calendar). Sabbatai Tzvi, at 39,
proclaims himself Messiah in Gaza. Announcing that, “He will proceed to the river
Sambatyon to bring back the Lost Tribes".
Sabbatai Tzvi and Nathan the Prophet felt an empathy for Jesus. According to Sabbatean
belief, the soul of the messiah had been reincarnated 18 times from Adam onward,
including, probably, Jesus. Reportedly Sabbatai Tzvi once exclaimed: "What has Jesus
done that you ill-treated him thus? I shall see to it that he will be counted among the
prophets. (In time, Sabbateans would quietly take the helm of the Vatican)
1665- December 30th. Sabbatai Tzvi left Smyrna by ship for Istanbul with a group of his
1665- Sabbatai Tzvi placed under house arrest by the Sultan. Locked in chains and is
threatened with poison arrows to prove his divinity. Is given choice between Islamic
conversion or death. Sabbatai chooses Islam and life. He doesn’t cease being a Jew but
becomes Muslim also. Sabbatai is above the categorisation of Jew or Muslim. Much to the
shock and chagrin of the Jewish world Sabbatai appeases the Sultan. He then begins to
lay the groundwork restructuring of the world based on universalism and world
brotherhood ruled by an elite of his devoted followers dedicated to eradicating the world’s
ills and promoting progress of civilisation.
1665- Sabbatai given post in the Sultan’s palace until 1673.
1673- Sabbatai exiled to Albania
1674- Treaty of Westminster – New York and New Jersey given back to England after
Third Dutch War.
1676- Sabbatai Tzvi dies. Donmeh formed.
1690- German Jewish immigrants to England start a synagogue. This first Ashkenazi
community was formed in London and soon, Ashkenazi established congregations all over
England. By 1690, there were about 400 Jews in England.
1697- Judah the Pious started off with 31 families of scholars to await the Messianic
revelation of a resurrected Sabbatai Tzvi.
1700- Judah the Pious arrives in Jerusalem and dies (most definitely murdered) days later.
1700- William III knighted the first Jew (Sephardic), Solomon de Medina, on June 23.
1701- A Sephardic synagogue at Bevis Marks was opened.
1705- A Hebrew printing press started in London.
1706- Judah HeChassid (the Pious) believed that the dead Sabbatai Tzvi was, in fact, the
Messiah. He expected his second appearance in 1706
1716- Baruchya Russo claimed to be the Messiah, the reincarnation of Sabbatai Tzvi and
an incarnation of God.
1716- The first known Jewish Mason, dating from 1716 (one year before the creation of
the first Grand Lodge) was an English Sephardi, Francis Francia, also known as the
"Jacobite Jew." He was tried and later exonerated from an accusation of high treason. In
an English newspaper of 1877, recounting this incident, Francia is called a Mason.
1717- Freemasonry founded in England upon the Seven Laws of Noah as mentioned in
the Talmud, and the re-building of Solomon’s Temple.
1726- Jacob Frank born in Berezanka or Korolowka, Galicia, Poland. [now in Ukraine]
1730- Masonic lodges, promoting universal brotherhood, began springing up in continental
Europe. At that time a new type of Jew was emerging, one who had acquired some
Western education and had adjusted his behaviour to conform to the standards accepted
among gentiles, to the extent that he now could aspire to full membership in their society.
This new Jew first made his appearance among the Sephardim of England, Holland, and
France and afterward among the Ashkenazim of all Western countries. After the 1780's he
became a permanent feature of European social life as becomes evident from the number
of Jews who kept knocking at the doors of the Masonic lodges.
1732- Another Jew, Edward Rose, was initiated in a Lodge presided by Daniel Delvalle,
'eminent Jew snuff merchant' as characterised in a report in the Daily Post of 22
September 1732. Without doubt, Delvalle must have preceded Rose by several years, to
have reached the high position of Master of the Lodge. Furthermore, Bro. Mathias Levy, in
an article entitled 'Jews as Freemasons' published in The Jewish Chronicle in 1898, claims
that the initiation took place 'in the presence of Jews and non-Jews.' These other Jews
present must have been Masons themselves, initiated at an earlier date.
1734- 6,000 Jews live in England. The Jewish upper class still consisted of brokers and
foreign traders, but Jews gradually entered all areas of life. The first Jews were
1744- Mayer Amschel Rothschild, born Mayer Amschel Bauer on February 23, 1744 in
Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany. He was the founder of the Rothschild family banking empire
that would become one of the most successful business families in history. He changed his
name to Rothschild (Red Shield in English) from Bauer, the previous family name, in
reference to the red shield that was the official house sign and thus logotype of the family
business, a bank and a brothel, founded by his father Moses. Mayer Amschel’s famous
quote is "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws"
1751- Jacob Frank proclaimed himself a messiah.
1752- Jacob Frank married.
1753- The Jewish Naturalisation Bill (Jew Bill) was issued to give foreign-born Jews the
ability to acquire the privileges of native Jews, but was rescinded due to anti-Jewish
1755- Jacob Frank, in Poland, formed a sect that held that certain elect persons are
exempt from the moral law. This sect abandoned Judaism for a “higher Torah” (Jewish
Law) based on the Zohar, which was the most important work in the Kabbala, the Jewish
mystical movement. Hence its members also called themselves Zoharists. Their practices,
including orgiastic, were sexually promiscuous rites. Joseph II, Emperor of Austria beds
with Franks daughter, Eva during a rite. (Antelman TETO vol.1 p.104)
1756- The Jewish community banned Jacob Frank and his group as heretics.
1756- An anthology of Masonic prayers appeared in print, among them one to be recited
"at the opening of the lodge meeting and the like for the use of Jewish Freemasons" in
Jewish lodges.
1759- September 17th Jacob Frank converts to Christianity.
1760- February 6, Jacob Frank arrested in Warsaw on the charge of feigned conversion to
Catholicism and the spreading of a pernicious heresy. He was convicted as a teacher of
heresy, and imprisoned him in the monastery in the fortress of Czestochowa, so that he
might not communicate with his adherents.
1760- Baal Shem Tov dies.
1769- Napoleon born on August 15.
1770s- Jacob Frank made a pact with Adam Weishaupt, a Jewish-born Jesuit, to enlist his
Sabbateans to join Weishaupt's Illuminati. [Note: The Illuminati Order was not invented by
Adam Weishaupt, but rather renewed and reformed. The first known Illuminati order
(Alumbrado) was founded in 1492 by Spanish Jews, called ‘Marranos,’ who were also
known as ‘crypto-Jews.’ In 1491 San Ignacio De Loyola was born in the Basque province
of Guipuzcoa, Spain. His parents were Marranos and at the time of his birth the family was
very wealthy. As a young man he became a member of the Illuminati Order in Spain. As a
cover for his crypto Jewish activities, he became very active as a Roman Catholic. In 1539
he had moved to Rome where he founded the ‘Jesuit Order’.]
1772- August. Frank released by conquering Russians who had occupied Czestochowa
1772-86- Frank moves to the Moravian town of Brno (Bruenn). Lives there for thirteen
years. Frank spoke a great deal about a general revolution which would overthrow
kingdoms, and the Catholic church in particular.
1776- Freemasonry's American Revolution
1780- The Order of the Asiatic Brethren in Europe, founded in Brno (Bruenn), Moravia by
Jacob Frank, who changed his name to Dobrushka, to construct an upper level above the
regular Masonic structure which opened doors to additional mysteries. The Order's
theosophic doctrines and ceremonial regulations were based upon Jacob Frank's
Militaristic version of Sabbatean Kabbalah. (Katz p.27)
1784- Sir Moses Montefiore (Sephardic, Mason)(1784-1885) was born in Livorno, Italy.
1786- Jacob Frank suffers temporary financial problems, and moved his court to
Offenbach, near Frankfurt. There Frank’s money problems were solved by benefactors
among them, M.A. Rothschild.
1789- French (Masonic) Revolution
1791- Jacob Frank dies in Offenbach.
1791- Masonic Napoleon emancipates French Jewry. (One hundred years later, another
French Mason, Baron Edmond de Rothschild would support the establishment of Israel.)
1796-97- Napoleon's Italian campaign.
1799- Masonic brother, Napoleon becomes First consul of the French Republic.
1894- Napoleon becomes Emperor of the French.
1806- Napoleon's Jewish "Sanhedrin" convenes.
1806- Holy Roman Empire falls under Napoleon (Napoleon Mason possibly of Spanish
Marrano origins)
1807- The Frankfurt Judenloge founded by M. A. Rothschild clerk Geisenheimer. "The old
established Frankfurt families were well represented in the lodge including: the Adlers,
Speyers, Reisses, and Sichels. Even the richest and most powerful Frankfurt families were
included: the Ellisons, Hanaus, Goldschmidts, and Rothschilds. Salomon Mayer (who
afterward moved to Vienna), the second of the five Rothschild brothers, became a
1812- September 19th, Mayer Amschel Rothschild dies.
Napoleons "defeat" at Battle of Waterloo. N. M. Rothschilds victory at the London Bourse.
1816- Eva Frank dies.
1829- Jews began arguing in England for official equality.
1833- The first emancipation bill passed the House of Commons but was defeated in the
House of Lords. In 1833, the first Jew was admitted to the Bar.
1835- The first Jewish sheriff was appointed.
1837- Queen Victoria knighted Moses Montefiore.
1841- Isaac Lyon Goldsmid was made baronet, the first Jew to receive a hereditary title. In
1841, the first Anglo-Jewish periodical, The Jewish Chronicle, was founded. It still exists
1855- The first Jewish Lord Mayor of London, Sir David Salomons took office. In 1855,
Jews College, a theological seminary, was started. It is now an affiliate of London
University that offers rabbinical training and adult education.
1858- The emancipation of the Jews and a change in the Christian oath required of all
members of Parliament. On July 26, 1858, the Jewish Baron, Lionel de Rothschild, took
his seat in the House of Commons after an 11-year debate over whether he could take the
required oath. A Jewish welfare organisation for the poor called the Jewish Board of
Guardians (now the Jewish Welfare Board) was created in 1859.
1863- Rothschild and Isaac Goldsmit of the Ashkenazic community joined Sir Moses
Montefiore of the Sephardim to solidify the Board of Deputies of British Jews. Rabbi
Nathan Marcus Adler united all Ashkenazic congregations near London into a United
Synagogue and created the chief rabbinate of England.
1874- Benjamin Disraeli became the first “Jewish” Prime Minister.
1881- Mustafa Kemal the Jew (later known as Ataturk) was born in Thessaloniki (now in
1882- 46,000 Jews lived in England
1885- Sir Moses Montefiore dies.
1888- Adolph Hitler was conceived, in Vienna, during a Frankist celebration of the Ninth of
Av, which took place on July 20th, 1888 in celebration of Sabbatai Tzvi's birthday. Adolph
Hitler was born 9 months later on April 20th, 1889.
Are the Shabbatean-Frankists Continuing Where King
Solomon Left Off?
The throne of King Solomon is described in 1 Kings 10:18-20: "Moreover the
king made a great throne of ivory, and overlaid it with the best gold.. The throne
had six steps, and the top of the throne was round behind: and there were
stays on either side on the place of the seat, and two lions stood beside the
stays. And twelve lions stood there on the one side and on the other upon the
six steps: there was not the like made in any kingdom.”
King Messiah, Shabbatai Tzvi depicted sitting atop Solomon's Throne
The mystical messiah, Shabbatai Tzvi had come to complete the mission of
Solomon which was nothing less than to establish Davidic rule over the Earth by
any and all means possible, overtly or covertly. Shabbatai Tzvi first tried to
overtly take the throne of the Sultan of the Ottoman empire who, at the time,
ruled the known world. When the Sultan refused to hand over his crown and
sceptre, Shabbatai Tzvi, at first despondent, realised that Providence had
opened up a different door. A door that led to the covert path of the messiah.
The bible speaks of the messiah entering Jerusalem in two manners. He will
either arrive on clouds or riding a donkey. The arrival on clouds is a metaphor for
ease of acceptance. The governing authorities will realise the greatness of the
messiah and bow to his rule. The donkey or "chamor" in Hebrew denotes the
opposite. The donkey connotes burden. The messiah will be confronted with a
burden upon entering the gates of Jerusalem. The ruling authorities will be
threatened and attempt to thwart his mission.
When Shabbatai Tzvi approached the Sultan, the Sultan, though he realised
Shabbatai was a noble soul,was not prepared to hand over his crown. Instead,
he gave Shabbatai Tzvi a simple choice. Don the turban (convert to Islam)or die.
Now, Shabbatai Tzvi knew himself to be the Lord's chosen messiah. He knew
that death could not possibly be an option for him. Conversion? To a Jew, that
was worse than death. Nevertheless, Shabbatai Tzvi chose to convert. Why?
He had faith in Providence. He soon realised that Providence had merely shown
him a different door. He would bring Davidic rule over the Earth by covert
With his decision to convert however, he lost the support of world Jewry. This is
understandable. Their decision to abandon their messiah didn't alter Shabbatai
Tzvi's status a being the messiah though. He kept going. He just took his
mission underground and shouldered the burden of covertly establishing Davidic
world rule. He and his followers went about this process is so quietly that,
although they have all but accomplished their mission, the people of the world
are none the wiser. At this point, even though we are discussing it openly, the
rule of the Shabbatean-Frankists is so complete that we pose absolutely no
threat. All safeguards are in place. We will be branded anti-semites (even though
I am Jewish)and dismissed as one would dismiss a fool. Today, conspiracy
theory is considered the play of fools.In a is as, at this point there is
nothing that can undo the rule of the Shabbatean-Frankists. 99% of the people
reading this still doubt the existence of the group.
Israel's Shabbatean Leaders Exposed!
This is a photo of Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, the "Father of the State of Israel”:
Here is his Wiki: He can also be
found on the new Israeli 100 shekel bill.
Yitzhak Ben-Zvi (24 November 1884 – 23 April 1963; Hebrew: צבי בן יצחק (was
a historian, Labor Zionist leader, the second and longest-serving President of
Following his studies at Galatasaray High School in Constantinople, from 1912
to 1914 Ben-Zvi studied law at Istanbul University, together with the future Israeli
prime minister David Ben-Gurion.
Ben-Zvi served in the Jewish Legion together with Ben-Gurion. In 1919, he
helped found the Ahdut HaAvoda party, and became increasingly active in the
Haganah. He was later elected to the Jerusalem City Council and president of
the National Council, the shadow government of the Jewish community in
Mandatory Palestine. According to a book published in 1985, Ben-Zvi allegedly
ordered the 1924 political assassination of Jacob Israël de Haan,who had
turned into an anti-Zionist.
"In 1948, Ben-Zvi headed the Institute for the Study of Oriental Jewish
Communities in the Middle East, later named the Ben-Zvi Institute (Yad Ben-Zvi)
in his honour. His main field of research was the Jewish communities and sects
of Asia and Africa, including the Samaritans and Karaites." Ben-Zvi also
researched the Shabbatean Donmeh community of Turkey. Within the Ben-Zvi
Institute are important relics from the days of the "false" Shabbatai Tzvi.
In Gershom Scholem's Magnum Opus entitled, "Shabbatai Tzvi:The Mystical
Messiah, there are no less than 18 footnotes and references to relics of
Shabbatai Tzvi that are housed at the Ben-Zvi Institute.
It is interesting that the "Father of the State of Israel" had become an expert in
Shabbatean artifacts.
I found it a curious coincidence that a man with the surname Ben-Zvi, was not
only a curator of an Institute housing Shabbatean artifacts but also an honored
politician of Israel. Curious because Shabbatai Tzvi also was known as ben-Zvi
(son of Zvi or Tzvi or Sevi)as his father was named Tzvi.
(Tzvi is Hebrew for deer)
Was it possible that Yitzhak Ben-Zvi,the "Father of the State of Israel, was
descended from Shabbatai ben-Tzvi?
Ben-Zvi went to school in Turkey. Shabbatai Tzvi was from Turkey. (He went to
school with David Ben-Gurion. Perhaps Ben-Gurion is also a descendant of
Shabbatai Tzvi?)
It would be in line with Illuminati irony to have a descendant of Shabbatai Tzvi
honoured as the Father of the State of Israel.Was the State of Israel named for
the messiah Shabbatai Tzvi's eldest son? Again, that would be in line with
Illuminati irony. Israel ben Shabbatai ben Zvi was likely ground zero of the
Shabbatean-Frankist breeding program patterned after Solomon's breeding
Did the "Father of the State of Israel" descend from Shabbatai Tzvi? Perhaps.
I'm inclined to think so.
Ever wonder why the same politicians keep rotating in positions of power in
Israel? Perhaps they too descend from the covert messiah Shabbatai
Tzvi.Perhaps that is why the secret society, Freemasonry is so popular in Israel.

Shabbatean-Frankist Sex Rituals Explained
There is very little available information regarding the sex rituals of the messianic
Shabbatean-Frankist cult. The information that I have read on the subject
speaks of incest and adulterous rituals taking place under the cloak of secrecy.
What was the purpose of these rituals? Where did they originate?
The messianic idea originated within Judaism. The first requirement of the
messiah, according to Jewish scripture, is that the messiah must come from the
House of David. David and his son Solomon were both considered successful
rulers. As they had the blessings of the Most High, they had what it took to
bring law and order to an otherwise unruly and ungodly region like Canaan.
They did so with blood-shed and taxes. Sound familiar? It should. The world
today is being run according to the Davidic/Solomonic model. According to
Jewish scripture, God did not allow David to build His Temple. Why? Because
David had too much Canaanite blood on his hands. The building of the Temple
fell to Solomon.
Solomon built the Temple of God by imposing heavy taxes where ever he could.
Solomon ruled for 40 years. After he died, the Kingdom of Israel became
divided for one reason or another. Heavy taxes was not the least of reasons for
the break-up. Jewish scripture blames the division of Solomon's kingdom on
Solomon's "sins." Though scripture states that Solomon was the wisest of all
men, it nevertheless faults him with foolishness when it came to three things. 1.
He gathered too much gold. 2. He took too many wives. 3. He acquired too
many horses. These three things were expressly forbidden to Jewish kings in
scripture. It God Himself who,through Moses, set this warning before the future
kings of Israel. What was Solomon thinking?
Too make a long story short, the prophesy of a "messiah" promised to restore
the glory of Israel and took hold over the minds of the Jewish people. The
messiah would be a man, with Divine authority, who would take over where
Solomon left off. The Davidic royal dynasty would be restored with Jerusalem at
the centre of their ever-lasting Kingdom. This time, however, Davidic dynasty
would establish rule over the entire Earth.
The messiah would be a Jewish king, a descendent of David who would pick
up where Solomon left off and establish a messianic dynasty upon the entire
world. Solomon had taken a lot of heat for his sins but were they sins? Perhaps
Solomon was in the process of fulfilling the role of the messiah? Let's look at his
"sins": In Deuteronomy 17:16-17, a king is commanded not to multiply horses
or wives, neither greatly multiply to himself gold or silver. 1. Greatly multiply gold
or silver: Was Solomon attempting to establish a World central bank? 2. Multiply
horse: Was Solomon attempting to assemble the world's greatest army? A
United Nations Peacekeeping Force if you will? 3. Multiply wives: Solomon had
700 wives. 700 is a metaphor. According to Jewish tradition, the world is
comprised of 70 nations. 10 is a kabbalistic metaphor for completeness. 700
denotes that Solomon was married to all the princesses of the known world,
from the daughter of Pharaoh on down.
He was son-in-law to the lesser kings and noblemen of the known world. This
act of massive polygamy united the nations of the world into one family. In short,
Solomon's sin brought global solidarity. Solomon turned all nations into allies
through mass marriage and allies don't fight allies.Family doesn't war with
family. For whatever reason, Solomon's "messianic" plan stalled. Enter
Shabbatai Tzvi,the "Mystical Messiah" and Jacob Frank, the "Militant Messiah"
and their dynasty, the Rothschilds.
The result of Shabbatean-Frankist messianic efforts have achieved what David
and Solomon had initiated. As regards: Multiply Gold & Silver:The value of gold
is determined everyday in the offices of the Rothschilds in London. Multiply
Horses: The Rothschild's Shabbatean-Frankist messianic cult operates the
worlds largest peacekeeping force through the United Nations. Multiply Wives:
The sex rituals of the Shabbatean-Frankists have exponentially multiplied the
group in a hidden manner providing politicians with no apparent link to the cult
that can operate on either side of a given political party or conflict of war. The
United Nations envisioned by David and Solomon have been realised through
the Cult of the All-Seeing Eye a.k.a. Shabbatean-Frankists. This realisation
occurred on a global scale. There was more blood shed than David shed in
battle with Canaan. Peace has been achieved, or rather, will soon be achieved
across the Earth rather than within the regional kingdom of ancient Israel.




Wikipedia ...Jonathan Eybeschutz
Born 1690 Kraków, Poland
Died 1764 (aged 73–74)
Altona, Holstein, Denmark–NorwayReligion Judaism Spouse Elkele Spira Children Wolf Jonas Eybeschutz
Rav Jonathan (Yonoson יונתן) Eybeschütz (also Eibeschutz or Eibeschitz; 1690 in Kraków – 1764 in Altona), was a Talmudist, Halachist, Kabbalist, holding positions as Dayan of Prague, and later as Rabbi of the "Three Communities": Altona, Hamburg and Wandsbek. With Rav Jacob Emden, he is well known as a protagonist in the Emden–Eybeschütz Controversy.
Rav Eybeschütz's father Nosson Nota[1] was the rabbi in Ivančice (German: Eibenschütz, sometimes Eibeschutz), Habsburg Moravia. Rav Eybeschütz was a child prodigy in Talmud; on his father's death, he studied in the yeshiva of Meir Eisenstadt in Prostějov (Prossnitz), and then later in Holešov (Holleschau). He also lived in Vienna for a short time. He married Elkele Spira, daughter of Rabbi Isaac Spira, and they lived in Hamburg for two years with Mordecai ha-Kohen, Elkele's maternal grandfather.

At the age of eighteen, Rav Eybeschütz was appointed rabbi of Mladá Boleslav, where he stayed for three years, afterward settling in Prague in 1700 and becoming head of the yeshivah and a famous preacher. The people of Prague held Rav Eybeschütz in high esteem and he was considered second there only to Dayan David Oppenheim.

In Prague, Rav Eybeschütz received permission to print the Talmud—but with the omission of all passages contradicting the principles of Christianity in consultation with Dayan David Oppenheim. Legends and rumors seeking to discredit the event said that he did this without the consultation of the Rabbis of Prague, and they revoked the printing license.

Already in Prague 1724, he was suspected of being a Sabbatean. He even got up on Yom Kippur to denounce the Sabbatean movement, but he remained suspected.[2] Therefore, In 1736, Rav Eybeschutz was only appointed dayan of Prague and not chief rabbi. He became rabbi of Metz in 1741. In 1750, he was elected rabbi of the "Three Communities:" Altona, Hamburg, and Wandsbek.

He was "an acknowledged genius" in at least three separate areas of Jewish religious creativity: Talmud and Jewish law (halakhah); homiletics (derush) and popular preaching; and Kabbalah. "He was a man of erudition, but he owed his fame chiefly to his personality. Few men of the period so profoundly impressed their mark on Jewish life."[3] His granddaughter was the Breslau poet and intellectual Lucie Domeier [de], born Esther Gad.

Sabbatian controversy
Rav Eybeschütz again became suspected of harboring secret Sabbatean beliefs because of a dispute that arose concerning the amulets which he was suspected of issuing. It was alleged that these amulets recognized the Messianic claims of Sabbatai Zevi.[3] Once the controversy started when Rav Yaakov Emden found serious connections between the Kabbalistic and homiletic writings of Rav Eybeschutz with those of the known Sabbatean Judah Leib Prossnitz, whom Rav Eybeschütz knew from his days in Prossnitz.[2] Rabbi Jacob Emden accused him of heresy.[3] The majority of the rabbis in Poland, Moravia, and Bohemia, as well as the leaders of the Three Communities supported Rav Eybeschütz: the accusation was "utterly incredible"—in 1725, Rav Eybeschütz was among the Prague rabbis who excommunicated the Sabbateans. Others suggest that the Rabbis issued this ruling because they feared the repercussions if their leading figure, Rav Eybeschütz, was found to be a Sabbatean. Recent evidence has produced the actual amulets and their alleged connection to Sabbatean amulets.[4]

In 1752, the controversy between Rav Emden and Rav Eybeschütz raged. In December of that year, the Hamburg government banned any more discussion of the amulets, the Senate of Hamburg suspended Rav Eybeschütz, and many members of that congregation demanded that he should submit his case to rabbinical authorities. At this point he was defended by Carl Anton, a convert to Christianity, but a former disciple of Rav Eybeschütz.[5]

The controversy was a momentous incident in Jewish history of the period—involving both Rav Yechezkel Landau and the Vilna Gaon—and may be credited with having crushed the lingering belief in Sabbatai current even in some Orthodox circles.[3]

In 1760, the quarrel broke out once more when some Shabbatean elements were discovered among the students of Rav Eybeschütz' yeshivah. At the same time his younger son, Wolf Jonas Eybeschutz, presented himself as a Shabbatean prophet, and was close to several Frankists, with the result that the yeshivah was closed.[6]

According to Jacob Katz, Rav Jonathan Eybeschütz's grandson was rumored to be Baron Thomas von Schoenfeld, an apostate Jew who inherited his grandfather's collection of Sabbatean kabbalistic works. He eventually left the Sabbatean movement and founded a Masonic lodge called the Asiatische Bruder, one of four Illuminati lodges in Vienna. After his uncle's death on August 10, 1791, he was offered the leadership of the Frankist movement which he refused. Katz disputes this claim however, saying that Baron Thomas von Schoenfeld was a member of the Dobruschka family of Brьnn and was in no way related, either by blood or marriage, to Rav Eybeschutz. According to Gershom Scholem, the ideology of the Asiatic Brethren mixed Kabbalistic and Sabbatean ideas jumbled together with Christian theosophic doctrines.[7]

Some of Rav Eybeschutz's descendants are the Yiddish novelist and Holocaust survivor Chava Rosenfarb (1923–2011),[citation needed] and Rav Shmuel Wosner (1913–2015), a prominent Haredi rabbi and posek ('decisor of Jewish law') who lived in Bnei Brak, Israel.[citation needed]

Thirty of his works in the area of Halakha (Jewish law) have been published. In addition, several of his works on homiletics, teaching methodology, and Kabbalah are currently in print. Only one of his works was published in his lifetime. The posthumous printing of so many of his works is testimony to his influence on his contemporaries through his oral teachings and his personality.

Homiletics (derush) and popular preaching:[citation needed]:
Ya'arot Devash a frequently quoted collection of the sermons of Rabbi Eybeschutz.
Tiferet Yehonatan on the weekly Torah portion
Midrash Yehonatan on the weekly Torah portion
Ahavat Yehonatan on the weekly Haftarah
Shirei Mitzvot, the 613 commandments in rhymed acrostics.
Notes on the Passover Haggadah, as well as Perush al Piska Had Gadya on the poem Had Gadya
On Talmud and halakhah:[citation needed]:
Chasdei Yehonatan, Pilpulim on assorted Sugyas of Talmud and halakhah.
Novellae to Shulchan Aruch: Urim ve-Tummim on Choshen Mishpat; Kereti u-Peleti on Yoreh De'ah; Sar ha-Alef on Orach Chayim.
Notes on Maimonides' Mishneh Torah: Binah la-Ittim and Chiddushim al Hilkot Yom Tov both dealing with the holy days, and both published by his students, based on notes taken from his lectures; Bene Ahuvah on the matrimonial laws.
Tiferet Yisrael, notes on the rabbinical laws of niddah (regarding menstruation), with additions by the editor, his grandson Israel.
Matuk MidVash, notes on the rabbinical laws of shabbos.
On Kabbalah:[citation needed]:
Shem Olam, a collection of letters on the Kabbalah
Rabbi Eybeschutz also wrote Luchoth Edut (Tablets of Testimony), in which he describes the whole dispute and attempts to refute the charges against him. It includes also the letters of recommendation which he had received from leading rabbis who came to his defense. In January 2014, Maggid Books, a division of Koren Publishers Jerusalem published "Derash Yehonatan: Around the Year with Rav Yehonatan Eybeshitz" by Rabbi Shalom Hammer. This work is one of the first English translations of Rabbi Eybeshutz's writings.


Order of the Asiatic Brethren
The Order of the Asiatic Brethren were also know as the Die Ritter des Lichts (Knights of the Light) AKA Order of Knights and Brothers of the Light; Die Brueder St. Johannes des Evangelisten aus Asien in Europa (the Asiatic Brethren of St. John the Evangelist in Europe) banned 1785.

An Advanced group of Freemasonry specialty Lodges which integrated Qabalistic teachings as well as true Masonic Brotherhood without regard to Religion. While one of the basic tenants of Freemasonry is the Brotherhood of Man under the All-Seeing Eye of God, “Let a man’s religion or mode of worship be what it may, he is not excluded from the Order, provided he believe in the glorious Architect of heaven and earth, and practice the sacred duties of morality. Freemasons unite with the virtuous of every persuasion in the firm and pleasing bond of fraternal love.”

In practice, social divisions of Race, Creed, Nation and Religion have all been barriers to be overcome, and in every age new barriers are identified and torn down that Masons may meet On The Level, as Equals.

The Order of the Asiatic Brethren was specifically set up as German conservatism waned and the American Revolution set the stage for a new world order where all would be equal in opportunity, regardless of the accident of Birth. At the same time, Moses Mendelssohn was reforming the tribal attitudes of the Jews of Europe and a more “European” cultured Jew was appearing in the cities. This social upheaval was influenced by the French Revolution, it's Reign of Terror, Napoleon's invasion of Germany, the establishment of Masonic Lodges under the Grand Orient of France Grand Lodge.

While the (all too brief) lesson of Religious Tolerance in Germany is of social significance, it's influence on Magickal thought in Europe immense. Under the organizational guidance of Hans Heinrich von Ecker und von Eckihoffem such Qabalistic scholars as Baron Thomas von Schoenfeld (born a Jew, Moses Dobruška later to become a Monk, Junius Frey), Ephraim Joseph Hirschfeld and his technically better brother Pascal translated many Qabalistic texts by hand, and assisted von Eker with creating advanced Masonic Rites based on those teachings. These were shared with Esoteric Freemasons in France, Russia and England. Carried by Traveling Men such as Count Apponyi and Johann Friedrich Falk to Magicians in both England ( Frederick Hockley, Kenneth R H Mackenzie) and the Continent Éliphas Lévi and through him to Papus. When the American Magician Paschal Beverly Randolph brings it to the New World in the mid 1800's it has already been mixed with the Magic of Cornelius Agrippa and Francis Barrett into an Occult Philosophy recognizable today.

The Order of the Asiatic Brethren was the Masonic side of the academically minded Magical Order of the Golden and Rosy Cross (Orden des Gold- und Rosenkreutz) in Germany. It's influence on the Fraternitas Rosae Crucis AKA the Fraternity of the Rosy Cross in it's various disguises in France seems recognizable in it's degree system and mix of teachings. Both seem likely influences on the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and all it's descendants. That the French and English Orders that follow are more focused on Qabalah and Solomanic (Ceremonial) Magick than practical alchemy indicates their primary source was the Asiatic Brethren than the Golden and Rosy Cross itself, where practical, medicinal results in laboratory experiments and patenting the results was the focus.

It organized Melchisedeck lodges to perform the 1st 3 degrees of Freemasonry for non Christians so they could join this advanced Freemason society. In addition to Alchemy, these Qabalists studied instructions how to rule spirits, by breaking the seven seals. Although mixing Christian and Jewish symbolism, 3rd degree initiates were called “True Rosicrucians.”

It was structured with two Informational degrees, the Seekers received lectures, then 2nd degree “Sufferers” did physical experiments in Alchemy. The First Chief Degree of “Knights and Brother-Initiates from Asia in Europe“ has many Masonic elements and an oath of Secrecy. The Second Chief Degree, Wise Masters taught qabalistic secrets. The Third, or Chief Degree was called the Royal Priests, or True Rosicrucians, or the Degree of Melchisedeck. Hints indicate it may have been instructions on the Holy Names of God and their uses in both Meditation and Magick. The highest degree, the Sanhedrim, a term taken from Rabbinical literature, ran the Order.

Duke Charles introduced it into Sweden in the 1780s, followed up by C A Boehman in the 1790s, who, after fighting with both the Golden and Rosy Cross (Orden des Gold- und Rosenkreutz) in Germany and Adam Weishaupt's Order of Illuminati in Bavaria, formed a masonic-magical society called DELU in Denmark with Prince Carl of Hessen.

Among it's practitioners was Johann Caspar Lavater, author of Aphorisms of Man, 1788, a hero of William Blake; Sir Ralph Hamilton; Carl Boheman;

Jews and Freemasons in Europe 1723-1939 by Jacob Katz, 1970; a big tip of the hat to the Wethersfield and Southern CT State College Libraries for assisting in finding this book


Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: A Precise Exegesis on the Available Evidence
- by Terry Melanson, Aug. 5th, 2005

Illuminati Conspiracy Part Two: Sniffing out Jesuits

A Metaprogrammer at the Door of Chapel Perilous


n the literature that concerns the Illuminati relentless speculation abounds.

No other secret society in recent history - with the exception of Freemasonry - has generated as much legend, hysteria, and disinformation. I first became aware of the the Illuminati about 14 years ago. Shortly thereafter I read a book, written by Robert Anton Wilson, called Cosmic Trigger: Final Secret of the Illuminati. Wilson published it in 1977 but his opening remarks on the subject still ring true today:
Briefly, the background of the Bavarian Illuminati puzzle is this. On May 1, 1776, in Bavaria, Dr. Adam Weishaupt, a professor of Canon Law at Ingolstadt University and a former Jesuit, formed a secret society called the Order of the Illuminati within the existing Masonic lodges of Germany. Since Masonry is itself a secret society, the Illuminati was a secret society within a secret society, a mystery inside a mystery, so to say. In 1785 the Illuminati were suppressed by the Bavarian government for allegedly plotting to overthrow all the kings in Europe and the Pope to boot. This much is generally agreed upon by all historians. 1 Everything else is a matter of heated, and sometimes fetid, controversy. It has been claimed that Dr. Weishaupt was an atheist, a Cabalistic magician, a rationalist, a mystic; a democrat, a socialist, an anarchist, a fascist; a Machiavellian amoralist, an alchemist, a totalitarian and an "enthusiastic philanthropist." (The last was the verdict of Thomas Jefferson, by the way.) The Illuminati have also been credited with managing the French and American revolutions behind the scenes, taking over the world, being the brains behind Communism, continuing underground up to the 1970s, secretly worshipping the Devil, and mopery with intent to gawk. Some claim that Weishaupt didn't even invent the Illuminati, but only revived it. The Order of Illuminati has been traced back to the Knights Templar, to the Greek and Gnostic initiatory cults, to Egypt, even to Atlantis. The one safe generalization one can make is that Weishaupt's intent to maintain secrecy

has worked; no two students of Illuminology have ever agreed totally about what the "inner secret" or purpose of the Order actually was (or is . . .). There is endless room for spooky speculation, and for pedantic paranoia, once one really gets into the literature of the subject; and there has been a wave of sensational "ex-poses" of the Illuminati every generation since 1776. If you were to believe all this sensational literature, the damned Bavarian conspirators were responsible for everything wrong with the world, including the energy crises and the fact that you can't even get a plumber on weekends. (pp. 3-4)

That short excerpt is perhaps the most honest and succinct introduction to the Illuminati as you'll ever come across. So it is more than a bit ironic that Wilson, throughout the rest of the text, proceeds to perpetuate and expand upon similar myths, and in the process manages to take it to a whole new level. 2 In the end, the Illuminati had mystified Wilson as much as anyone in the preceding centuries. Robert Anton Wilson (RAW) is an enigma in his own right: an archetypal Trickster in the tradition of Aleister Crowley or Timothy Leary, both of whom he greatly admires. 3 The Cosmic Trigger Trilogy is meant to awaken the reader to multiple mind-blowing streams of thought and completely shatter preconceived notions of perception, time and space - much as the writings of illuminists themselves. Herein lies the seed of speculation to the effect that he must surely be in on the conspiracy - some have gone so far as to believe he's the Grand Master (or inner head) of the Illuminati himself. Wilson has always toyed with the accusations, and in typical RAW fashion, he's never denied it outright. Cosmic Trigger wasn't the first book Wilson dedicated to the theme, however. Two years earlier, in 1975, RAW and co-author Robert Shea popularized the modern wave of Illuminati conspiracies with the publication of the novel Illuminatus! Trilogy. A veritable cult classic, Illuminatus invigorated the underground market and spawned a whole new generation of conspiracy authors. One cannot read any of RAW's material without a healthy sense of humor, though, and Illuminatus is definitely no exception. Written between 1969 and 1971 it reads like a subversive anarchist manual, yet satirical and surreal at the same time. The cut-and-paste job of excerpts right into the flow of dialogue - from books and pamphlets on a wide range of conspiracy theories - probably boosted its appeal from the beginning. Any researcher investigating the Illuminati today would be remiss not to mention RAW - especially in a book or document purporting to cover the subject in detail. With the exception of Myron Fagan, "Wild" Bill Cooper, 4 the John Birchers and Biblical endtimes literature, the formation of the current mythos surrounding the subject has a lot to do with the popularity of Wilson's books: have you ever seen the Illuminati and the star Sirius mentioned in the same paragraph? Before plunging headlong into the history of the Bavarian Illuminati, it might be useful to have a look at Wilson's diagram - his interpretation (at the time) of the "occult conspiracy" as it has been transmitted through the ages (Cosmic Trigger: Final Secret of the Illuminati, p.188):

New Promethean Possibilities
“European aristocrats transferred their lighted candles from Christian altars to Masonic lodges. The flame of occult alchemists, which had promised to turn dross into gold, reappeared at the center of new "circles" seeking to recreate a golden age: Bavarian Illuminists conspiring against the Jesuits, French Philadelphians against Napoleon, Italian charcoal burners against the Hapsburgs.”
- Billington, Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith, p. 6

The Bavarian Illuminati originated during an age replete with the growing belief in the acquisition of truth through observation and experience. The Age of Enlightenment was in full swing and by the end of the Eighteenth Century an explosion of natural philosophy, science, the resurgence of hermeticism and occult experimentation, all competed directly with the traditional teachings of the Church and the Jesuit monopoly in the Universities and Colleges. 5 Numerous ideologies owe an intellectual and political heritage to this period: skepticism, rationalism, atheism, liberalism, humanism, reductionism, modernism, communism, nihilism and anarchism - among the most apparent. As the Eighteenth Century came to a close Baron de Montesquieu (1689-1755), Denis Diderot (1713-1784), Voltaire (1694-1778), Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), Marquis de Condorcet (1743-1794), Comte de Mirabeau (1749- 1791), David Hume (1711-1776), Adam Smith (1723-1790), Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772) and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832) were famous in their own time. The instrument of reason became a new faith, no less susceptible to its own breed of dogmatism. The philosophers of the Enlightenment reasoned that the physics of Newton might become applicable in all fields of endeavor: the fundamental cosmic laws of nature could transform society and man himself into a "noble savage." 6 The idea of a "glorious revolution" attained widespread acceptance, but during Weishaupt's time it was still a relatively new concept to link political change with social change. The "imminent revolution of the human mind," promulgated by the "radical Bavarian Illuminists," coincided with Mirabeau's doctrine of a coming secular upheaval and universal revolution. Mirabeau proclaimed Prussia to be the most likely place for the start of the revolution, with the "German Illuminists as its probable leaders." History records, however, that it was Mirabeau himself who became one of the main catalysts to spark the "fire in the minds of men" during the French Revolution. 7 At about the same time Weishaupt was embarking on an academic career two important figures entered the world stage: Thomas Robert Malthus, 8 born in 1766, a major influence on Darwinism, population control and the eugenics movement; four years later we see the birth of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, in Stuttgart Germany, the inventor of what would become known as the "Hegelian Dialectic." "For Hegelians,"

Antony C. Sutton reports, "the State is almighty and seen as 'the march of God on earth.' Indeed, a State religion. Progress in the Hegelian State is through contrived conflict: the clash of opposites makes for progress. If you can control the opposites, you dominate the nature of the outcome" (Introduction to the 2002 edition of America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones, no pagination PDF copy). Revolutionary radicals were impressed with the proof-of-concept displayed by the ruthless conspirators in France. Malthusian and Hegelian dogma became equally influential for anarchists, communists, the intelligentsia and the new breed of revolutionaries that surfaced in the 19th Century: Young Hegelians such as Bakunin, Proudhon and Marx took up the cause in the "spirit of the times" to "destroy in order to build."

The Bavarian Illuminati: The "Insinuating Brothers" of ☉
“Weishaupt . . . proposed as the end of Illuminism the abolition of property, social authority, nationality, and the return of the human race to the happy state in which it formed only a single family without artificial needs, without useless sciences, every father being priest and magistrate. Priest of we know not what religion, for in spite of their frequent invocations of the God of Nature, many indications lead us to conclude that Weishaupt had, like Diderot and d'Holbach, no other God than Nature herself. From his doctrine would naturally follow German ultra-Hegelianism and the system of anarchy recently developed in France, of which the physiognomy suggests a foreign origin.”
- Henry Martin, Histoire de France depuis les temps les plus reculés jusqu'en 1789, XVI. 533. 9

“Do you realize sufficiently what it means to rule - to rule in a secret society? Not only over the lesser or more important of the populace, but over the best of men, over men of all ranks, nations, and religions, to rule without external force, to unite them indissolubly, to breathe one spirit and soul into them, men distributed over all parts of the world? . . . And finally, do you know what secret societies are? What a place they occupy in the great kingdom of the world's events? Do you think they are unimportant, transitory appearances?”
- Adam Weishaupt, Nachtrag von weitern Originalschriften, II, pp. 44, 51. 10

A quick perusal on the World Wide Web will show the disparity of opinions and irreconcilable differences about the history of the Illuminati - Bavarian or otherwise. It's getting better though, a recent article published by the American Atheists 11 - The Enlightenment, Freemasonry, and The Illuminati - has solid documentation and thorough references for those inclined to investigate further into primary and secondary source material; the Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon has uploaded part of Vernon L. Stauffer's New England and the Bavarian Illuminati; has most of the relevant parts of John Robison's classic, Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe; the Catholic

Encyclopedia has long had a good, but short, article; nearly the complete text - and the two most important chapters as it concerns the Illuminati - from Nesta Webster's Secret Societies & Subversive
Movements has been posted; three important chapters from Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman's To Eliminate the Opiate Vol. I; has an adequate article; and, for those poor Dan Brown fans whose first

introduction to the Illuminati was the bestseller Angels & Demons, there's a good debugging write-up from the Center for Studies on New Religions. If you never buy a single book on the Illuminati, and just read the internet references cited above, you would have an excellent grasp - much greater than your average conspiracy theorist - on the facts (as we can safely say) concerning the rise and fall of the Bavarian Illuminati. I have taken it a bit further, however. For the last six months I've engaged in a crash course on the Illuminati and related subjects: absorbing and taking notes from Proofs of a Conspiracy ..., and other internet references; buying Barruel's Memoirs
Illustrating the History of Jacobinism, Billington's Fire In the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith,

Webster's Secret Societies & Subversive Movements, Antelman's To Eliminate the Opiate Vol. 1, Yates' The
Rosicrucian Enlightenment, Fulop-Miller's The Power and Secret of the Jesuits, Carr's Pawns in the Game; and at

the same time consulting other works, in my own personal library, when needed. 12

A Chronological Overview
In an effort to keep the notes to a minimum and still provide thorough citation, the following abbreviations will be applied: • AB - Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism, by Augustin Barruel, 1798, Real-View-Books Classics Reprint, 2002 edition • VS - Chapter III: The European Illuminati (332 KB), from New England and the Bavarian Illuminati, by Vernon L. Stauffer Ph.D., 1918 • JB - Fire In the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith, by James H. Billington, 1980 • NW - Secret Societies & Subversive Movements, by Nesta H. Webster, 1924, A&B Publishers Group, 1998 • JR - Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe, by John Robison, 1798 • MA - To Eliminate The Opiate, by Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman, 1974 • CG - The Enlightenment, Freemasonry, and The Illuminati, by Conrad Goeringer • TM - A Bavarian Illuminati Primer, by Trevor W. McKeown • MI - The Illuminati and Angels & Demons FAQ - Do the Illuminati Really Exist?, by Massimo Introvigne • CE - Catholic Encyclopedia: Illuminati


February 6. Adam Weishaupt is born (d. 1830) of Westphalian parents [CE] in Ingolstadt Bavaria. Fittingly, the Weishaupt family name first appeared in Baden and was anciently associated with tribal conflicts around the area. [House of Names: Weishaupt Family Crest]

Weishaupt's father, George, dies. He is turned over to his liberal godfather, Baron Johann Adam Ickstatt (1702-1776), curator of the University of Ingolstadt and a member of the Privy Council. [VS, CG] While growing up Weishaupt was educated by the Jesuits and was "accorded free range in the private library of his godfather, the boy's questioning spirit was deeply impressed by the brilliant though pretentious works of the French 'philosophers' with which the shelves were plentifully stocked." [VS] He studies law, economics, politics, history and philosophy; voraciously devouring every book which he came across. [VS]

Weishaupt graduates from the University of Ingolstadt. He serves for four years as a tutor and catechist. [VS]

Weishaupt is appointed as professor of civil law at the University of Ingolstadt. [CE]

Pope Clement XIV dissolves the Jesuit Order. Weishaupt becomes the first layman to occupy the chair of canon law; the prestigious position had been held by a Jesuit for the previous 90 years. [VS, CE] Weishaupt marries, against the wishes of Ickstatt. [VS]

Weishaupt is promoted to dean of the faculty of law. [VS]

May 1. Weishaupt founds the Order of the Illuminati with an original membership of five. 13 The Order is secret, hierarchical and modeled on the Jesuits. The original name for the Order was uncertain: Perfectibilists and Bees were both considered, but Weishaupt settled on Illuminati - chosen, perhaps,

because of the "image of the sun radiating illumination to outer circles" [JB: 94-95] The Order was, therefore, always represented in communications between members as a circle with a dot in the center ☉ This symbolic imagery - the point within a circle, the Perfectibilists and the Bees - is also reflective of Weishaupt's fascination with Eleusinian 14 and Pythagorean Mysteries; no doubt learning of this early on having access to Ickstatt's considerable library. Like most secret societies the basic structure of the Order was divided into classes and degrees, in the following manner:


The Nursery
Preparatory Literary Essay 2. Novitiate (Novice)


Minerval (Brethren of Minerva, Academy of Illuminism) 4. Illuminatus Minor

2. Symbolic Freemasonry
1. 2. 3. 4.
1. Scots Major Illuminatus 2. Scots Illuminatus Dirigens (Directory)

Apprentice Fellow Craft Master

2. Mysteries
1. Lesser

1. Presbyter, Priest, or Epopt 2. Prince or Regent

1. Magus


2. Rex or King

"The Zoroastrian-Manichaean cult of fire was central to the otherwise eclectic symbolism of the Illuminists; their calendar was based on Persian rather than classical or Christian models." [JB: 95] Weishaupt explains: "The allegory in which the Mysteries and Higher Grades must be clothed is Fire Worship and the whole philosophy of Zoroaster or of the old Parsees 15 who nowadays only remain in India; therefore in the further degrees the Order is called 'Fire Worship' (Feuerdienst), the 'Fire Order,' or the 'Persian Order' -

that is, something magnificent beyond all expectation." [NW: 201] Weishaupt constructed the Illuminati calendar to commemorate the date of the Persian King Yazdegerd III (632 AD) [MI] - the Parsees (Parsis) still use the same dating system to this day. 16 Barruel relates how the Illuminati Novice in-training "must … learn how to date his letters, and be conversant with the Illuminized Hegira or Calendar; for all letters which he will receive in future will be dated according to the Persian era, caled [sic] Jezdegert and beginning A.D. 630. The year begins with the Illuminees on the first of Pharavardin, which answer to the 21st of March. Their first month has no less than forty-one days; the following months, instead of being called May, June, July, August, September, and October, are Adarpahascht, Chardad, Thirmeh, Merdedmeh,
Shaharimeh, Meharmeh: November and December are Abenmeh, Adameh: January and February, Dimeh, and Benmeh: The month of March only has twenty days, and is called Asphandar." [AB: 429; emphasis in

original] 17 For the Novice, the letters to his Superior are to be written in cipher: "he must make himself master of that cypher, which is to serve him until initiated into the higher degrees, when he will be entrusted with the hieroglyphics of the Order." [AB: 429] Barruel (p.438) displays the first cipher 18 introduced to the Illuminati Novice:

















































The Hieroglyphic cipher used in the higher Scotch Knight degrees is also reproduced by Barruel:

The Bavarian Illuminati were set up for "political intriguing rather than in speculation" [NW: 201], the Illuminati became "much more characteristic of a militia in action than an order with initiations." [JB: 95] Weishaupt's contempt for certain esoteric pursuits - as a "thing-in-itself" - was widely known: "... in Weishaupt's system the phraseology of Judaism, the Cabalistic legends of Freemasonry, the mystical imaginings of the Martinistes, play at first no part at all. For all forms of 'theosophy,' occultism, spiritualism, and magic Weishaupt expresses nothing but contempt, and the Rose-Croix masons are bracketed with the Jesuits by the Illuminati as enemies it is necessary to outwit at every turn. Consequently no degree of Rose-Croix finds a place in Weishaupt's system, as in all the other Masonic orders of the day which drew their influence from Eastern or Cabalistic 19 sources." [NW: 200] Weishaupt seems to have shown the most disdain towards the occult pursuits of his own time; of the ancient mysteries he has nothing but high regard. The Insinuators, while in pursuit of potential recruits, "must remark, that there exists doctrines solely transmitted by secret traditions, because they are above the comprehension of common minds. In proof of his assertions he will cite the Gymnosophists in the Indies, the Priests of Isis in Egypt, and those of Eleusis and the Pythagorean School in Greece." [AB: 422] Ascending the Illuminati hierarchy wasn't so much for the purpose of attaining wisdom as to be "remade into a totally loyal servant of a universal mission." [JB: 94] In a letter to fellow Illuminist, Xavier Zwack, dated Mar 10 1778, Weishaupt had said, "We cannot use people as they are, but begin by making them over." [JB: 94]

Weishaupt is initiated into Freemasonry, in Munich, at the Lodge Theodore of Good Counsel. By the middle of 1779, Weishaupt's "Insinuators" had completely wrestled control of the Lodge and it was regarded as part of the Order of the Illuminati. [VS]

February 8. Weishaupt's wife dies. [VS] July. Baron von Knigge is initiated into the Order. [VS] Knigge was connected to the court of Hesse-Cassel [VS] and a prominent Strict Observance freemason. He subsequently restructured the Order and recruited many prominent members: "the notion of restricting the field of recruiting solely to the young was abandoned, and this phase of the propaganda was widened so as to include men of experience whose wisdom and influence might be counted upon to assist in attaining the objects of the order." [VS] By 1784, largely due to Knigge's circle of influence, the Illuminati had "between two and three thousand members." [VS]

July 16. Congress of Wilhelmsbad convened. Probably the most significant event of the era as far as any official coalition between secret society factions:
“At Wilhelmsbad, near the city of Hanau in Hesse-Cassel, was held the most important Masonic Congress of the eighteenth century. It was convoked by Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick, 20 Grand Master of the Order of Strict Observance ... there were delegates from Upper and Lower Germany, from Holland, Russia, Italy, France, and Austria; and the order of the Illuminati was represented by the Baron Von Knigge. It is not therefore surprising that the most heterogeneous opinions were expressed.”
- Albert G. Mackey. Mackey's Revised Encyclopedia Of Freemasonry, under "Wilhelmsbad, Congress of"

" was not until the Congress de Wilhelmsbad that the alliance between Illuminism and Freemasonry was finally sealed....What passed at this terrible Congress will never be known to the outside world, for even those men who had been drawn unwittingly into the movement, and now heard for the first time the real designs of the leaders, were under oath to reveal nothing. One such honest Freemason, the Comte de Virieu, a member of Martiniste Lodge at Lyons, returning from the Congre's de Wilhelmsbad could not conceal his alarm, and when questioned on the 'tragic secrets' he had brought back with him, replied: 'I will not confide them to you. I can only tell you that all this is very much more serious than you think. The conspiracy which is being woven is so well thought out that it will be, so to speak, impossible for the monarchy and the Church to escape from it." From this time onwards, says his biographer, M. Costa de Beauregard, 'the Comte de Virieu could only speak of Freemasonry with horror.'" (Nesta H. Webster. World
Revolution - The Plot Against Civilization, p. 18.)

April 20. Baron von Knigge resigns from the Illuminati. His quarrels with Weishaupt over the direction and management of the Order had reached a boiling point. A certain amount of jealousy was apparent from both parties - though Weishaupt certainly was a Machiavellian, by all accounts. On July 1st Knigge signs a formal agreement to return all property, rituals and initiations belonging to the Order, and to maintain silence about Illuminati secrets. Knigge was convinced of Weishaupt's Jesuitism; he accused him of being "a Jesuit in disguise." [VS, CE] June 22. The Elector of Bavaria, Duke Carl Theodore, issues the first edict against secret societies not authorized by the law or the sovereign. This first edict seems to have been brought upon by ex-member, Professor Joseph Utzschneider, who had quit the Order in August 1783. Just a few months later, in October, Utzschneider along with Grünberger and Cosandey, fellow professors with him in the Marianen (Marienburg) Academy 21 and members of the

Order, presented the Duchess Maria Anna with an internal Illuminati document, and a membership list. The Duchess was thoroughly alarmed and passed it on to the Duke. [VS, JR]

February. Some members of the Illuminati appeal to Carl Theodore for an appearance before him to prove their innocence. The offer is rejected. [VS] March 2. The Bavarian Monarch issues the second edict against secret societies, specifically naming the Illuminati and Freemasonry; shortly after a considerable amount of important documents were concealed or put to the flames. [VS] This second ban was more forceful, it "left no room for evasion." The government enforcers were giving weapons to "wage an effective command." [VS] Weishaupt had already left his post at the University two weeks earlier, obviously knowing about the approaching storm. "He fled across the border to Regensburg, and finally settled at Gotha" under the protection of Illuminati member Duke of Saxe-Gotha. [VS] Thirteen years later Barruel writes, "[Weishaupt] now banished from his country as a traitor to his Prince and to the whole Universe, peacefully at the court of Ernest Lewis, Duke of Saxe Gotha, enjoys an asylum, receives a pension from the public treasury, and is dignified with the title of Honorary Councellor to that Prince." [AB: 400] Judicial inquiries were held at Ingolstadt. Subsequent government measures were taken and some members made formal confessions. A considerable membership was found to be held within the military; officers and soldiers were ordered to come forward and confess any involvement. State officials, professors, teachers, and students who were found out to be members were summarily dismissed. Some were even banished from the country. [VS] September 9. Utzschneider, Grünberger, and Cosandey make a joint Juridical Deposition before the Elector:
"The object of the first degrees of Illuminism is at once to train their young men, and to be informed of every thing that is going forward by a system of espionage. The Superiors aim at procuring from their inferiors diplomatic acts, documents, and original writings. With pleasure they see them commit any treasons or treacherous acts, because they not only turn the secrets betrayed to their own advantage, but thereby have it in their power to keep the traitors in a perpetual dread, lest, if they every showed any signs of stubbornness, their malefactions should be made known.-Oderint dum metuant, let them hate, provided they fear, is the principle of their government.

"The Illuminees from these first degrees are educated in the following principles:


"The Illuminee who wishes to rise to the highest degree must be free from all religion; for a religionist (as

they call every man who has any religion) will never be admitted to the highest degrees."

2. The Patet Exitus, or the doctrine on Suicide, is expressed in the same terms as in the preceding deposition. 3. "The end sanctifies the means. The welfare of the Order will be a justification for calumnies, poisonings,
assassinations, perjuries, treasons, rebellions; in short, for all that the prejudices of men lead them to call crimes. 4. "One must be more submissive to the Superiors of Illuminism, than to the sovereigns or magistrates who govern the people; and he that gives the preference to sovereigns or governors of the people is useless to us. Honor, life, and fortune, all are to be sacrificed to the Superiors. The governors of nations are despots when they are not directed by us.-They can have no authority over us, who are free men.

5. "The love of one's prince and of one's country are incompatible with views of an immense extent, with the
ultimate ends of the Order, and one must glow with ardour for the attainment of that end.

"The Superiors of Illuminism are to be looked upon as the most perfect and the most enlightened of men; no doubts are to be entertained even of their infallibility."

"It is in these moral and political principles that the Illuminees are educated in the lower degrees; and it is according to the manner in which they imbibe them and show their devotion to the Order, or are able to second its views, that they are earlier or later admitted to the higher degrees.

"They use every possible artifice to get the different post-offices in all countries entrusted to the care of their adepts only. They also boast that they are in possession of the secret of opening and reclosing letters without the circumstance being perceived.

"They made us give answers in writing to the following questions: How would it be possible to devise one single system of morals and one common Government for all Europe, and what means should be employed to effectuate it? Would the Christian Religion be a necessary requisite? Should revolt be employed to accomplish it? &c. &c.

"We were also asked, in which Brethren we should place the most confidence if there were any important plan to be undertaken; and whether we were willing to recognize the right of life and death as vested in the Order; and also the right of the sword, Jus Gladii.

"In consequence of our acquaintance with this doctrine of the Illuminees, with their conduct, their manners, and their incitements to treason, and being fully convinced of the dangers of the Sect, we the Aulic Counsellor Utzschneider and the Priest Dillis left the Order. The Professor Grünberger, the Priest Cosandey, Renner, and Zaupfer, did the same a week after, though the Illuminees sought to impose upon us shamefully, by assuring us that his Electoral Highness was a member of their Order. We clearly saw that a Prince knowing his own interests, and wholly attending to the paternal care of his subjects, would never countenance a Sect, spreading through

almost every province under the cloak of Free-masonry; because it sows division and discord between parents and their children, between Princes and their subjects, and among the most sincere friends; because on all important occasions it would install partiality on the seats of justice and in the councils, as it always prefers the welfare of the Order to that of the state, and the interests of its adepts to those of the prophane. Experience had convinced us, that they would soon succeed in perverting all the Bavarian youth. The leading feature in the generality of their adepts were irreligion, depravity of morals, disobedience to their Prince and to their parents, and the neglect of all useful studies. We saw that the fatal consequence of Illuminism would be, to create a general distrust between the prince and his subjects, the father and his children, the minister and his secretaries, and between the different tribunals and councils. We were not to be deterred by that threat so often repeated, That no Prince can save him that betrays us. We abandoned, one after the other, this Sect, which under
different names, as we have been informed by several of our former Brethren, has already spread itself in Italy, and particularly at Venice, in Austria, in Holland, in Saxony, on the Rhine, particularly at Frankfort, and even as far as America.-The Illuminees meddle as much as possible in state affairs, and excite troubles wherever their Order

can be benefited by them."

"We are not acquainted with the other Invisibles, who in all probability are chiefs of a higher degree.

"After we had retired from the Order, the Illuminees calumniated us on all sides in the most infamous manner. Their cabal made us fail in every request we presented; succeeding in rendering us hateful and odious to our superiors, they even carried their calumnies so far as to pretend that one of us had committed murder. After a year's persecution, an Illuminee came to represent to the Aulic Counsellor Utzschneider, that from experience he must have learned that he was every where persecuted by the Order, that unless he could contrive to regain its protection, he would never succeed in any of his demands, and that he could still regain admission." [AB: 684-88; emphasis in original]

On October 11 police search Xavier Zwack's residence in Landshut. A number of books and over two hundred letters, between Weishaupt and the Areopagites, were confiscated. The documents were published by the Bavarian government under the title Einige Originalschriften des Illuminaten Ordens. [VS, TM] The evidence discovered at Zwack's residence was considerable: besides the secret communications between the Illuminati Adepts, the authorities found tables containing the Order's symbols and the Persian calendar; membership rosters, statutes, instructions for recruiters, ceremonies of initiation and imprints of the Order's insignia; a eulogy of atheism and a copy of a manuscript entitled Better Than Horus; a proposal for a branch of Illuminism for woman; 22 several hundred impressions of Government seals (with a list of their owners, princes, nobles, clergymen, merchants, etc.), for the purposes of counterfeiting; instructions for the making of the poison Aqua Toffana, poisonous gas and secret ink; "an infernal machine" for the

safeguarding of secret papers - apparently a strong box that would blow up, destroying its contents; and receipts for procuring abortion and a formula for making a tea to induce the procedure. [VS, JR, MA: 51, NW: 228, AB: 692-93] In the space of a few months, in 1786 - in order to save face - Weishaupt pens 9 different apologetic pamphlets, most notably: Apologie der Illuminaten, Frankfort and Leipzig, 1786, and Vollständige Geschichte
der Verfolgung der Illuminaten in Bayern, Frankfort and Leipzig, 1786. [VS]

As a result of further police searches of Baron Bassus' castle at Sandersdorf, the Bavarian government published more secret documents of the Order: Nachtrag von weitern Originalschriften ... [VS] August 16. The third and final edict against the Order is put into effect by the Duke of Bavaria. The former edicts were reemphasized "and in addition, to give maximum force to the sovereign's will, criminal process, without distinction of person, dignity, state, or quality, was ordered against any Illuminatus who should be discovered continuing the work of recruiting. Any so charged and found guilty were to be deprived of their lives by the sword; while those thus recruited were to have their goods confiscated and themselves to be condemned to perpetual banishment from the territories of the duke. Under the same penalties of confiscation and banishment, the members of the order, no matter under what name or circumstances, regular or irregular, they should gather, were forbidden to assemble as lodges." [VS]

Illuminati Membership List: Alias, Occupation, Residence and Associates
Partial List of Known Illuminati: 1776 - 1787
Code Name (Alias) Abel, Jacob Friedrich von (1751-1829) Baader, Ferdinand M. (1747-1797) Baierhammer, Alois Banffy, Count des Barres, Karl
Archelaus Pythagoras Abderites


Circle of Influence

Professor of philosophy in Stuttgart; general superintendent in Urach and Reutlingen Professor, Munich; Physician to the Electress Dowager

Friedrich Schiller 23


Zoroaster, then Confucius

Monastery judge in Diessen

Governor of Transylvania Major in the French service

Bassus, Thomas Maria De (17421815)


Baron; Court adviser, Munich; printer

Weishaupt; Johann Simon Mayr; 24 Switzerland, Austria and Northern Italy

I was lucky enough to find a small write-up on Bassus. Here are some extracts taken from Massimo Lardi, Italianopera correspondent from Coira; Luca Bianchini and Anna Trombetta, Italianopera correspondents from Sondrio; and published in Grigionitaliani Notebooks, July 2000:

"The baron Thomas Maria Freiherr De Bassus was born in Poschiavo, Switzerland, in 1742. He studied jurisprudence at the University of Ingolstadt. Weishaupt (code name Spartacus), who founded the Order of the Bavarian Illuminati, on the 1 May 1776, was his schoolmate. De Bassus practiced for a year as an Adviser of court to Münich in Bavaria. In 1767 he became Patron [Podestà] of Poschiavo, a task already taken from his father Giovanni Maria. He married Cecilia Domenica Massella, from a family of notaries. At the premature death of his father, he inherited the palace of piazza del Borgo in Poschiavo, known today as the Albrici Hotel, in addition to his wealthy possessions in Valtellina and in Val di Poschiavo. After he had engaged the position of legal Assistant in Tirano (in the province of Sondrio, under the power of Grigioni), De Bassus became Podestà of Traona in 1781 and inherited in that period the goods of the German family branch, e. g. the feuds of Sandersdorf, Mendorf, Eggersberg, Harlanden and Dachenstein.

"Entering the Order of the Bavarian Illuminati with the code name of Hannibal, De Bassus had the assignment, like the pseudonym suggests, to spread Illuminism beyond the Alps, above all in the Three Leagues (Swiss) and in the north of Italy. De Bassus acquired a printing company that, with the help of the Illuminatus typographer Joseph Ambrosioni, became the center of the diffusion of Weishaupt's ideas from Poschiavo. The edition of De Bassus (1782) of the first Italian translation of the Werther of Goethe, written by Gaetano Grassi from Milan, was famous."

In 1787, police searches of the Baron's castle turned up incriminating evidence against himself and the Illuminati. He was a great recruiter for the Order. In letters to Weishaupt he boasted of his conquests at Bozen (in the south of Austria), initiating "the President, the Vice-President, the

principal Counsellors of Government, and the Grand Master of the Posts." Later, in his travels to Italy, he sends back word of having initiated "his Excellency the Count W…" in Milan. [AB: 605]

Bleibtreu, Karl


Counsellor of the Chamber at Neuwied Counsellor of the Chamber at Neuwied 25 Privy Counselor, Weimar; musician, composer, music teacher; translator, publisher, tutor Nicholas Bonneville; Goethe; Gotthold Ephraim Lessing -> Moses Mendelssohn's wife

Bleibtreu, Leopold Bode, Johann Joachim Christoph (17301793)



Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman declares that Bode was the tutor of Mendelssohn's wife [MA: 76]; very likely true since Bode was good friends with Mendelssohn's publishing partner, Lessing.

Goethe was another one of Bode's good friends, and it was probably through the latter that Goethe was "insinuated" into the Illuminati - he was certainly one of " Goethe's best Masonic advisers." Bode, according to Billington (p.96), was the "decisive channel of Illuminist influence" on Nicholas Bonneville, during his "first of two visits to Paris (June of 1787)" - which, by itself, is enough to support the theory for a real Illuminati influence on the French Revolution. The importance of Bonneville on the ideas and progression of the French Revolution, and on other groups and figures of the time, is fleshed out masterfully by Billington (Bonneville, Nicholas, 12, 25,
35-44, 56, 67, 73, 160, 259; Babeuf and, 83-86 3:234,240; German culture and, 60-62, 112; Illuminism and, 96-97, 99; journalism of, 35-38, 307, 458, 3:233,236; Pythagorean influence on, 100-3; Social Circle of, 33, 39, 42-44, 60, 72, 76, 84-85, 103, 484).

Bronner, Franz Xaver (17581850)


A former Benedictine monk who left the monastery to become a teacher, poet and librarian in Switzerland; 26 German-Swiss writer and professor Governor of Galicia from 1780 to Viennese Lodge, The Truthful Harmony;

Brigido, Count

Joseph (d. 1817) Busche, Georg Baron von dem Cobenzl, Count Johann Ludwig von (1753-1809)

1794 Hanoverian Lieutenant-General

Archbishop of Ljubljana, Ivan Michael


Treasurer at Eichstatt; Austrian Envoy to St. Petersburg; Court Chancellor, State Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister 27 Austrian Vice Chancellor, successor to W. Kaunitz in the office of Court Chancellor and Vice Chancellor; Foreign Minister 28 High Bailiff at Weinberg in the Electorate of Hanover Counselor at Munich

Cobenzl, Johann Philipp Graf von (1741-1810)

Numa Pompilius Romanus



Costanzo, Marquis Const. von Dalberg, Karl Theodor, Baron Von (1744-1817)


Baco v. Verulam Grand Duke of Frankfort-on-the-Main; (also Crescens 29 ) Archbishop-Elector of Mainz, Arch-

Mayer Amschel Rothschild; Goethe, Schiller, Wieland

Chancellor of the Holy Roman Empire, Archbishop of Regensburg

Archbishop Dalberg was an emancipator of the Jews. In 1811 he enacted a special law "decreeing that all Jews living in Frankfort, together with their descendants, should enjoy civil rights and privileges equally with other citizens." 30 In exchange for these newfound liberties the Jews had to pay him 440,000 florins; 31 financed by Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 32 at a substantial profit, no doubt. A number of Masonic Jews at the time also petitioned von Karl for the "exclusive right to maintain lodges in the city." 33

According to Niall Ferguson, Mayer Amschel was soon acting as Dalberg's "court banker." During the emancipation of the Frankfort Jews, Rothschild had also advanced him 80,000 gulden "to finance his journey to Paris for the baptism of Napoleon's son." Afterwards, Rothschild assisted him in speculative purchases of land and Dalberg returned the favor by appointing Mayer Amschel to the electoral college of Hanau. Mayer Amschel's son, also named

Amschel, continued the relationship after his father's death and advanced 250,000 gulden for Dalberg to purchase horses for the French army. 34

This Illuminated Prince had a spectacular career in the Roman Catholic church. According to the, Archbishop Dalberg was a Priest for twenty-nine years and a Bishop for twenty-eight. At the time of his initiation though he had only been "Coadjutor of Mentz." [AB: 699]

Interestingly, Lord Acton (John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton) inherited the title of baronet from his grandfather, whose cousin had married the only daughter of Karl's nephew Emmerich Joseph Dalberg (Emeric Joseph, duc de Dalberg). 35 Ditfurth, Franz W. v. (17381813) Dorsch, Anton Josef (17581819) Drexel, Anton (1753-1830) de Duffrene (Dufresne), Franz Paul Eckartshausen, Karl von (17521803)

Assessor to the Imperial Chamber of Wetzlar

Ptolemäus Lathurus

Professor of theology in Mainz; Professor of Moral Theology at the Episcopal Academy in Strassburg 36 Libraran at Munich



Commissary at Munich

Atilius Regulus

Aulic Advisor and Councilor to Karl The Court of Karl Theodor; reader's of his Theodor, Elector and Duke of numerous literary works - posthumously, Bavaria; Censor of the Library at and most significantly, A. E. Waite - > Munich; Keeper of the Archives of the Aleister Crowley -> Order of the Golden Electoral House; prolific writer in Dawn Munich: Sciences, fine Art, Drama, Politics, Religion and History, Magic and Alchemy

Major details of Eckartshausen's life can be read at, and in the Introduction to Eckartshausen's The Cloud upon the Sanctuary.

Ecker (Egkher), Ludwig Baron von (1757-1826) Ernst II, Ludwig


Judge at Amberg

Quintus Severus (also Timoleon)

Duke of Saxe-Gotha Altenburg

House of Wettin

Herzog von (1745-1804)

Full title: Ernst II Ludwig Herzog von Sachsen-Gotha-Altenburg; Weishaupt's protector in Gotha. Barruel (or his English translator, Robert Clifford) calls him "Ernest Lewis, Duke of Saxe Gotha." [AB: 400] 37

Falcke, Ernst Friedrich Hector (1751-1809) Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich (1740-1821) Ferdinand, Duke von Brunswick (1721-1792)


Counselor and Burgomaster at Hanover

Marcus Aurelius

Professor of philosophy at Göttingen


Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg; Military Frederick the Great; House of Orange; his General; Grand Master of Strict Masonic brethren Observance Freemasonry

"Illuminated name" gleaned from Barruel, p.699: "This adept is only mentioned under the initials P. F. V. B. (Prince Ferdinand von Brunswig), both when he sends for Knigge, and when he promises his protection to the adept who is to Illuminize England." So it's only a guess as to his alias, but it's a good one. That he was a member of the Order is never in dispute by all sources consulted.

Fronhofer, Ludwig (17461800) Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1749-1832)

Raimundus Lullus

Professor and counsellor in Munich


Chief advisor to Karl August, Duke of Saxon-Weimar; poet, playwright, novelist, philosopher, painter, composer, scientist, economist, sociologist, politician

Too numerous to mention

Goethe is one of the most influential literary figures of all-time. He is often described as the "last Renaissance man." Goethe undertook the task to reintegrate the fragmented hermetic doctrines, culminating in his seminal work Faust. Michael Baigent writes, "… behind the encyclopedic scope and breadth of his activities lay essentially the same impetus that had motivated Agrippa and Paracelsus … Goethe was the true heir of the Hermetic magus of the Renaissance, working primarily in solitude and making himself the real subject and object of his alchemical experiment. Goethe not only depicted a Faust figure. As his contemporaries recognized, he was himself a Faust figure, whose fictional depiction of the magus was but an adjunct of his own personal Hermetic quest." 38

Goethe's Faust has put him in the company of Homer, Dante and Shakespeare. Academics praise this work and lecture on the "wide panorama of scenes from the vulgar to the sublime, with passages of wondrous poetry that can be sensed even through the veil of translation." 39 His scientific investigations impressed future generations as well: "Awed by Goethe's literary fame, dazzled by his reputation as the universal man, in decades after his death even noted scientists like Ernst Haeckel early praised him as the bold amateur precursor of Darwin." 40

Carl Jung was another intellectual/mystic in awe of Goethe. Faust for him, throughout his life, was to remain his most sacred book: "I regard my work on alchemy as a sign of my inner relationship to Goethe. Goethe's secret was that he was in the grip of that process of archetypal transformation which has gone on through the centuries. He regarded his Faust as an opus
magnum or divinum. He called it his 'main business,' and his whole life was enacted within the

framework of this drama. Thus, what was alive and active within him was a living substance, a super personal process, the great dream of the mundus archetypus (archetypal world)." 41 Baigent elaborates: "For Jung, Goethe exemplified the premise enunciated by Hermetic magi of the more distant past, from Paracelsus and Agrippa back to Zosimus and the practitioners of ancient Alexandria - that the alchemist must ultimately be the subject and object of his own experiment, an experiment by which he himself is transmuted." 42 Haeffelin, Kasimir Frhr. von (1737-1827)
Philo of Byblos

Vice-President of the Spiritual Council at Munich, and Bishop in Partibus

Herder, Johann Gottfried von (1744-1803)

Damasus pontifex

General Superintendent, Weimar; philosopher, poet, critic, theologian

Goethe; Hegel; Immanuel Kant; Schleiermacher -> Böckh; Johann Georg Hamann; Karl August, Duke of SaxeWeimar -> University of Jena

Hertel, Jakob Anton Hoheneicher, Franz von Paula (1753-1844) Hornstein, Max Frhr. von Karl August (1757-1828)


Canon of Munich


Counselor and archivist in Freising


Baron, of Munich


Grand Duke of Saxe-WeimarEisenach

Karl Ludwig von Knebel; Goethe; Herder -> University of Jena; Frederick the Great -> "League of Princes"

Karl, Landgraf von HessenKassel (17441836)


Prince of the Hesse Royal Family Mayer Amschel Rothschild -> Nathan (Prince Karl of Hessen-Kassel); Office Mayer Rothschild -> British East India of Regent of Schleswig-Holstein; Company; Princess of Denmark, Mary Grand Master of the "Asiatic Hanover (wife); King of Denmark, Frederik Brethren" V Oldenburg (father in-law); Ephraim Joseph Hirschfeld; Comte de St. Germain; Hans Heinrich von Ecker und Eckhoffen (Magister Pianco); Isaak Daniel Itzig -> Moses Mendelssohn

The Asiatic Brethren is an important subject, and crucial to uncovering

the occult roots of various secret societies that appeared, seemingly out of nowhere, in the 18th Century. In fact, there is an entire site devoted to the subject, called the "Authentic Tradition," which has an unbelievable amount of research on the subject. The "Asiatics" link together Hermeticism, Gnosticism, Rosicrucianism, Templar Freemasonry, Jewish Cabalistic Frankist/Sabbatian occultism and the Illuminati. That our illuminated Prince was the Grand Master of the Asiatic Lodge 43 is significant: it definitively ties the two secret societies together.

St. Germain - Another intriguing connection is that of the famous occultist and alchemist, St.

Germain: "[Germain] soon makes another interesting acquaintance - Prince Karl of Hesse-

Kassel, Governor of Schleswig-Holstein and ardent Mason and occultist. St-Germain informs his new friend that he will be a permanent houseguest. Karl is reluctant, but finally agrees, and the two settle in Schleswig, where they study chemistry and distribute herbal remedies to the poor. Karl calls him 'the greatest philosopher who ever lived,' and nicknames him 'Papa'.

After five years, the Count catches pneumonia from his draughty lab. He dies on 27 February 1784. Karl is away at a Masonic conclave, but the death is witnessed by his doctor." 44

Maurice the Learned - It is revealing to note the long association of the Hessen-Kassel family to

the occult. One particular ancestor is noteworthy. Karl is a direct descendant of "Maurice the Learned" of Hesse-Cassel (Landgraf Moritz von Hessen-Kassel, 1572-1632). Maurice procured the services of Rosicrucians and Alchemists such as Johannes Rhenanus and Michael Maier. The former served the Prince in many capacities, "working first in his chemical laboratory and towards the end of his life as the Prince's family doctor. He was also the author of a number of Paracelsian and iatrochemical texts (e.g. Urocriterium Chymiatricum, Marburg, 1609) and clearly a practising alchemist." 45 As for the latter, Maier was a very important figure and well-connected with many of the leading nobility of Europe and other famous occultists such as Robert Fludd. Maier produced an incredible amount of Rosicrucian/alchemical treatises and became the court physician to Maurice around 1614. 46 Francis Yates also underscores the fact that the town of Cassel is where the Rosicrucian Manifestos were first published (1614 and 1615). 47 Hardly a coincidence, Maurice had already founded the Collegium Mauritianum in 1599, which taught all sorts of advanced arcane studies - while at the same time he controlled "an extensive hermetic alchemical circle." 48 The sudden open appearance of the Rosicrucians and their manifestos perplexing to most historians - isn't all that mysterious in an environment such as existed under his rule.

Much more research should be done on the House of Hesse as a whole; they appear to be the fulcrum of the most significant major revivals in western occult tradition.

Rothschild - Prince Karl and the House of Hesse represent the strongest connection yet

between the Rothschild Dynasty and the Illuminati. The two families had such an intimate relationship that there's a strong possibility for the Rothschilds having at least contributed financially to the Bavarian Illuminati - if only in Karl's name.

Beginning with Karl's father Friedrich (Friedrich II Landgraf von Hessen-Kassel), the HessenKassel Royal Family made a fortune from leasing Hessen-Kassel mercenaries to various

monarchies: "Hessen-Kassel contributed 16.000-23.000 men to the Anglo-Prussian army"; "17,000 Hessians fought the rebels in the WAR OF AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE - Count Friedrich 'earned' 20 million Thalers." 49 "His banker, since 1783, was Frankfurt Jew MEYER AMSCHEL
ROTHSCHILD; by clever management of the fund he and his sons made Friedrich's successor,

WILHELM IX. (Karl's brother), one of the wealthiest monarchs of his time." (Ibid.; italic emphasis mine, caps in the original)

From the Jewish Encyclopedia: "Mayer [Amschel Rothschild] was a general agent and banker, and traded also in works of art and curios. In the latter connection he became an agent of William
IX., Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, who on his father's death in 1785 had inherited the largest private

fortune in Europe, derived mainly from the hire of troops to the British government for the putting down of the Revolution in the United States." (italic emphasis mine)

From the very beginning the Rothschild patriarch sought to secure favor with the Hesse Royal Family. In 1769, after a letter of flattery to Karl's brother Prince William, Mayer Amschel Rothschild receives permission to nail a gold-letter sign to his shop, which read: "M. A. Rothschild, by appointment court factor to his serene highness, Prince William of Hanau." (The Rothschilds Part 1) By 1816 after the Austrian minister of finance proposed the Rothschilds receive official nobility, the Hesse Coat of Arms became a key component: "The Rothschilds were asked to submit a coat of arms, which Solomon did: it consisted in quarterly: 1) or an eagle sable surcharged in dexter by a field gules, 2) gules a leopard
passant proper, 3) a lion rampant, 4) azure, an arm bearing 5 arrows; in center a shield of gules. The

supporters were a greyhound and a stork, the crest a coronet with a lion issuant. […] The eagle alluded to Austria, the lion to Hesse-Kassel." (Jewish Heraldry; bold emphasis mine)

The Hesse-Kassel mercenary blood-money, in turn, became the catalyst for the beginning of the Rothschild family fortune. The Jewish Encyclopedia informs us that Nathan Rothschild was on such good terms with (Illuminati) Prince Dalberg, that Napoleon had made him a member of the Electoral College of Darmstadt in 1810. Meanwhile, the Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel (William IX) had already fled to Denmark after the battle of Jena in 1806. He sent his money "to Nathan in London, who in 1808 utilized it to purchase £800,000 worth of gold from the East India Company, knowing that it would be needed for Wellington's Peninsular campaign. He made no less than four profits on this: (1) on the sale of Wellington's paper, (2) on the sale of the gold to Wellington, (3) on its repurchase, and (4) on forwarding it to Portugal. This was the beginning of the great fortunes of the house, and its early transactions may be divided into three stages, in each of which Nathan was the guiding spirit: namely, (1) from 1808 to 1815, mainly the transmission of bullion from England to the Continent for the use of the British armies and for subventions to the allies; (2) from 1816 to 1818, 'bearing' operations on the stock exchange on the loans needed for the reconstruction of Europe after Napoleon's downfall; and (3) from 1818 to 1848, the undertaking of loans and of refunding operations, which were henceforth to be the chief enterprises of the house."

Kapfinger, Georg Kleucker, Johann Friedrich (17491827) Knigge, Adolph Franz Friedrich Ludwig Freiherr von (1752-1796)

Thales milesius

Secretary to Count Tattenbach Philosopher and theologian, rector at Osnabrueck; author of occult subjects Gotthold Ephraim Lessing; the Martinist Order; Franz Xaver von Baader

Terentius Varro


Writer; Freemason

Weishaupt, Goethe, Nicolai; German Masonic lodges; House of Hessen-Kassel

Baron Knigge was instrumental to the spread of Illuminism. He was "a man of considerable distinction in his day." [VS] He studied law at Göttingen and was

subsequently attached to the courts of Hesse-Cassel and Weimar. [VS] He penned works of "romance, popular philosophy, and dramatic poetry" [VS] and wrote reviews for Nicolai's
Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek. 50

He became fascinated with secret societies and, at the earliest age possible, joined a lodge of Strict Observance. He was very interested in the subjects of theosophy, magic, alchemy, and the Rosicrucians. [VS] Strict Observance freemasonry had been started in Germany by Baron von Hund. The "Knights of Strict Observance" swore allegiance to "unknown superiors" and claimed direct descent from the Knights Templar and the Rosicrucians. 51

The Strict Observance lodges created an occult pedigree to attract recruits with the promise of joining an Order of a continuous, ancient descent. Secrets that began in antiquity were more appealing than something only recently devised. Weishaupt understood this from the beginning
52 and had created his own mythical genealogy for the Illuminati, and when Knigge joined the

Order he immediately asked Weishaupt for proof. Weishaupt admitted it was only a ruse, but rather than being offended, Knigge - knowing that this was an important part of a secret society's appeal - immediately "proceeded to build one of his own, where the Illuminati were declared as having originally been founded by Noah, and revived after a period of decline by St John the Evangelist." [MI] Kolborn, Joseph Hieronymus Karl Freiherr von (1744-1816) KolowratKrakowsky, Count Leopold von (1727-1809)

Priest, later Bishop; personal secretary to Illuminati Baron Dalberg


Vice-Chancellor for Austria and Bohemia

"Kolowrat-Krakowsky, Count Leopold, b. Dec. 31, 1727, d. Vienna, Nov. 2, 1809, high-ranking state-official and minister, served for 63 years under 4 monarchs. 1869 Vice-Chancellor for Austria and Bohemia, 1871 President of the Hofkammer (Court Treasury) and Chairman of the "Ministerial-, Banco-, Hof-Deputation", 1782 Highest Chancellor and head of the joint financial and political administration of the court, 1792 First Minister of a newlyestablished central authority, 1796-1808 first directing Minister of State." 53

The higher degrees of the Illuminati were reserved for atheistic teachings. 54 In a letter to Zwack, Weishaupt expresses his doubt about Kolowrat's conversion to the illuminist ideology, worrying that he still clings to a traditional view on religion: "Do put Brother Numenius in correspondence with me," he says, "I must try to cure him of his Theosophical ideas, and properly prepare him for our views." [AB: 505] Koppe, Johann Benjamin (17501791) Kressel, Baron Kröber, Karl
Agis Accacius

Theology professor, Göttingen; writer; Superintendent at Göttingen and afterward at Hanover Vice chancellor of Bohemia Governor of the Prince of Stolberg's children at Neuwied Counsellor in Eidistatt

Lange, Franz Georg (b. 1747? 55) Lanz, Johann Jakob (1745? 56 -1785)



Secular priest in special service to the diocese (Ger. Weltpriester) in Erding


There's a lot of controversy surrounding this Illuminatus; and he is an initiate as Professor Dülmen confirms.

In 1785 Lanz was struck by lightning, and killed, at the side of Weishaupt in Regensburg. Here's Weishaupt's account of the incident: "When my late friend Lanz was struck by lightning at my side in the year 1785 in Regensburg, what an opportunity this could have provided me to play the penitent and remorseful hypocrite, and thus gain the confidence of my persecutors."

Barruel says "Among his adepts was one LANZ, an apostate priest. Weishaupt designed him as the person to carry his mysteries and conspiracies into Selesia. His mission was already fixed, and Weishaupt was giving him his last instructions, when a thunder-bolt from Heaven struck the apostate dead, and that by the side of Weishaupt. The Brethren, in their first fright, had not recourse to their ordinary means for diverting the papers of the deceased adept from the inspection of the magistrate. [footnote] See the Apology of the Illuminees, P. 62." [AB: 683]

Lanz could very well have been on a mission to carry out "conspiracies into Selsia;" afterall, that is what they did: carry out conspiracies, that's the whole purpose behind the Order!

Illuminati apologists, such as the Freemasons, take issue with the fact that Barruel had called Lanz "an apostate priest," when in fact he was only a "Weltpriester." Minor detail, because Lanz was in fact an illuminatus. The Masons would have you believe the following: "As an example of the mythology that surrounds the history of the Illuminati, note that Barruel claimed that Lanz, an Illuminati courier and apostate priest, was struck by lightning, thus revealing Weishaupt's papers to the authorities, but this does not appear to be substantiated. This error was widely reprinted and enlarged on by subsequent anti-masons whose lack of research and disdain for historical accuracy has lead them to confuse Johann Jakob Lanz (d.1785), a non-Illuminati secular priest in Erding, and friend of Weishaupt, with Franz Georg Lang, a court advisor in Eichstätt who was active in the Illuminati under the name Tamerlan.

"Barruel mistakenly translated "weltpriester", or secular priest, as apostate priest and subsequent writers such as Webster and Miller have repeated this error. Eckert renamed Weishaupt's friend as Lanze and had him struck by lightning while carrying dispatches in Silesia. Miller cited Eckert but renamed Lanz as Jacob Lang and placed the lightning strike in Ratisbon. This is a minor detail in the history but it demonstrates the lack of accuracy often displayed by detractors of the Illuminati." (emphasis mine)

"Minor detail" is right! As I said, all that matters is Lanz WAS Illuminati. That there were secret documents found on his person hasn't been substantiated by any historian. But he was struck by lightning, and subsequently died; he was Illuminati; and most likely, he was carrying out some nefarious plot on behalf of his master and brethren.

I don't know why the Grand Lodge of Yukon and BC continue to falsely state that Lanz was "a non-illuminati"; after all, it is at their site that Professor Dülmen's list is published. Exact entry: "x Lanz, Joh. Jakob, Weltpriester in Erding [Sokrates], 89, 99, 101, 268, 392, 400." The "x" denotes a "secure" membership and long association; a double x (xx) represents an "unsecured" membership - they're not sure about the candidate yet, but an illuminated alias was given nonetheless. The reason I have published the present document is to be as historically accurate as possible; the masons profess the same thing, and giving Dülmen's membership list, a correction on their part is warranted.

Lodron, Maximilian Graf von (1757-1823)

Numa Pompilius graecus

Counsellor at Munich

Mändl, Theodor Massenhausen, Anton von


Court chamber advisor, Munich Counsellor of the fiscal authority, Munich Weishaupt and the whole of the Order ("Ajax" was an original member and the Illuminati's treasurer) Mirabeau; Baron von Knigge


Mauvillon, Jakob (1743-1794)

Agesilaus (and also Professor in Kassel; French economic Arcesilas) philosopher (Physiokrat)

According to Wikipedia, during a secret mission to the court of Prussia in July of 1786, Mirabeau had made the acquaintance of Mauvillon "whom he found possessed of a great number of facts and statistics with regard to Prussia; these he made use of in a great work on Prussia published in 1788 [De la monarchie prussienne sous Frédéric le Grand]."

Weishaupt's second-in-command, Baron von Knigge, had also struck up a friendship with Mauvillon - to the benefit of the Illuminati. In a letter to Weishaupt, he writes: "I have now found in Cassel the best man, on whom I cannot congratulate ourselves enough: he is Mauvillon, Grand Master of one of the Royal York Lodges. So with him we have the whole lodge in our hands. He has also got from there all their miserable degrees." [NW: 210]

Meggenhofen, Ferdinand Baron von (1760-1790) Metternich, Franz Georg Karl von (1746-1818)


Regiments auditor, Burghausen; Captain in the Bavarian service


Imperial Ambassador at Coblenz

Prince Clemens Metternich (son) -> the Rothschilds and Henry Kissinger

Metternich was a diplomat, his son Count Clemens Metternich followed in his father's footsteps; very famous in his time and one of the principal negotiators of the Congress of Vienna, he also became involved with the Rothschilds. Interestingly, Henry Kissinger would write his PhD thesis in 1957 on the life of Clemens Metternich, titled A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the
Problems of Peace 1812-22. 57

Merz, Max Edler von


Envoy in Regensburg; later Secretary to the Ambassador of the Empire at Copenhagen Ecclesiastic at Freising

Michl, Anton (1753-1813)


Mieg, Johann Friedrich (17001788) Montgelas, Maximilian Josef Garnerin, Count von (1759-1838) Münter, Friedrich (1761-1830)


Counsellor at Heidelberg


Bavarian Electorate adviser

Bavarian Elector; Countess von Arco (wife)

Spinoza 58

Theologian in Copenhagen, church historian and archaeologist; Danish Bishop Bookseller and publisher, Berlin; founder, along with Lessing and Mendelssohn, of the Bibliothek der schonen Wissenschaften (Library of Fine Philosophy) and the periodical, Briefe, die neueste Literatur betreffend; editor of the journal Allgemeine
Deutsche Bibliothek

Nicolai, Christoph Friedrich (17331811)


Lessing, Mendelssohn, Herder, Goethe, Schiller, Kant and Fichte; and, perhaps most notably for the present study, Adam Weishaupt himself

Nicolai was the focal point of the German/Prussian Aufklädrung (Enlightenment); and, along with his partners Lessing and Mendelssohn, he was largely responsible for it. Nicolai was undoubtedly Weishaupt's main source for procuring books and journals, and from that acquaintance was likely initiated into the Order himself. Subsequently, the Illuminati would publish many pamphlets, articles and revolutionary tracts through this most important channel.

To stress the importance of Nicolai to the dissemination of ideas during the German Enlightenment it is reported that his journal Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek, for instance, reviewed a staggering 80,000 books in forty years. It was "intended to review (and thereby to expose to as large a public as possible) the entire prose production of the time …" ( The Eighteenth Century German "Trivialroman" As Constructed By Literary History And Criticism)

Pappenheim, Friedrich Lothar Ferdinand Graf


General and Governor of Ingolstadt

von (1727-1792) Pestalozzi, Johann Heinrich (1746-1827) Poelffy, Count

Swiss Educator, Interlaken

Johann Herbart -> John Dewey; Friedrich Froebel

Chancellor of Hungary

Johann Herbart -> John Dewey; Friedrich Froebel

Riedl, Midiael von Röntgen, Ludwig


Counsellor at Munich


Lutheran minister


Karl Kröber (Agis) makes a revealing report to Areopagites concerning Röntgen: "This week we shall receive a Lutheran minister, who by slight of hand has collected nine thousand florins for the community … As soon as peace is made he is to set of for London, with a multitude of letters of recommendation. The Pr._F_O.B, uncle of the reigning Duke, has promised to second him in that country for the Order. He must slyly Illuminize the English …" [AB: 653] Abbé Barruel says that his copy of the Original Writings Vol. I contained a note in the margins stating that the initials refer to Prince Ferdinand of Brunswick.

Ruedorfer, Franz Xaver (17521811) Ruef, Kaspar (1748-1805) Sauer, Georg Conrad (17541797) Savioli-Corbelli Alexander Graf von (1742-1811) Schmerber, Sigmund Schröckenstein, Friedrich Freiherr von Seinsheim, Maximilian Joseph Graf von (1751-1803)

Livius/Plinius minor

Secretary of the States at Munich

Bavarian Academy of Sciences


Professor at Freiburg


Chancellor at Ratisbon


Court treasurer Munich

Bavarian Academy of Sciences


Merchant at Frankfurt am Main


Domherr (canon or "cathedral gentleman") in Eidistatt


Vice-President and Treasurer at Munich

Bavarian Academy of Sciences

Socher, Joseph (1755-1834) Sonnenfels, Joseph von (1733-1817)

Hermes Trismegistus

Curate in Haching; Philosopher and theologian Lawyer and writer in Vienna; Law professor at Vienna University for political science; Adviser to the empress 59 Viennese justice system; Joseph II 60

Fabius - Numa pompilius romanus

"Sonnenfels was professor of police and cameral sciences in Vienna and together with Justi the major figure in Austrian eighteenth century cameralism. He held several high offices in the Austrian administration and also was involved in the reform of the penal system and in various philanthropic activities. His Grundsätze der Polizey, Handlung und Finanzwissenschaft (2 volumes 1765-67) has been used as an official textbook for decades. Sonnenfels represented 'an improved version of the mercantilist theory... in several respects superior to Justi'" 61

"A son of the Jewish teacher of Hebrew Berlin Lipmann, an outstanding Austrian lawyer and writer; he is an author of excellent textbook Grundsätze der Polizei a Abschaffung der Tortur. His brother František belonged to the greatest benefactors in the town." 62 Stadion, Friedrich Lothar Joseph baron von (1761-1811) Stadion, Johann Philipp von (1763-1824) Stolberg-Rossla, Johann Martin, Count of (17281795)

Envoy in Munich


Ambassador at London; Count of Stadion-Warthausen

Ludovicus Germanicus also Campanella

Maternal uncle to the Prince of Neuwied

Barruel says that along with Stolberg, the whole Court of Neuwied is under the control of the Illuminati: "and with him may be comprised the whole court, the favorites, secretaries, and council without exception." [AB: 699]

Count Johann Martin Stolberg-Rossla is an ancestor of the current Royal Houses of Hesse and Mecklenburg-Schwerin.

Swieten, Baron Gottfried van (1733-1803) Tropenegro, Ernst Leopold

Minister of public instruction; patron of music

Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven; Frederick the Great 63

Counsellor at Munich

Utzschneider, Joseph von (1763-1840)

Hellanicus Lesbius Professor and Scientist at the original

Munich Institute; entrepreneur, optical instrument maker

Thomas John Hussey, Rector of Hayes, Kent; William Henry Fox Talbot; Sir John Herschel; Carl Friedrich Gauss; King Maximilian I Joseph (cousin of Karl Theodor)

His correspondence with Hussey and Talbot is well-known, as was his business for making telescopes (Reichenbach, Utzschneider und Liebherr). Sir John Herschel, Carl Friedrich Gauss, Bavarian Minister Montgelas (fellow Illuminatus, code name "Musaeus") and King Maximilian I Joseph (cousin of Elector Karl Theodor, who published the edicts against the Order) were among the notables to visit his world famous optical factory.

Along with Cosandey, Renner, and Grünberger, Utzschneider played a major role in the Illuminati's downfall. [VS, JR, CE]

Weishaupt, Adam (17481830) Werner, Erasmus von Will, Anton (1756-1827) Wundt, Karl Kasimir (17441784)


Founder; Professor at Ingolstadt

Revolutionaries for the next two-hundred years


Counsellor at Munich


Professor, Ingolstadt

University of Strasbourg, Lyon and Charenton Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt (grandson) -> Order of the Skull and Bones -> American Educational Establishment


Professor, Heidelberg University; pastor, Wieblingen

This member has the distinction of being the grandfather to the experimental educational psychologist, William Wundt. Wundt's methods were grafted onto the American Educational Establishment by three Skull and Bones members: "Daniel Coit Gilman (First President of University of California and First President of Johns Hopkins University), Timothy Dwight (twelfth President of Yale University) and Andrew Dickson White (First President of Cornell University)." (Professor Antony Sutton, America's Secret Establishment; PDF, no pagination, section titled "Memorandum Number Ten: Keeping The Lid On The Pot") The "revolutionary trio" of Bonesmen set off for the University of Berlin to receive post-graduate degrees while the "Hegelian philosophical ferment" was still in full swing. (Ibid.) This would mark the beginning of the plot to turn the education system into a humanistic "experimental laboratory." (See World Government Fronts, Psycho-social Change Agents, for instance)

I credit Sutton for citing Dülmen's work: the source for the majority of the members used to compile the present membership outline. After finding out Wundt had a grandfather in the

Illuminati I looked at the basis of Sutton's find: Richard van Dülmen's, Der Geheimbund der
Illuminaten. Darstellung, Analyse, Dokumentation (Stuttgart, 1977, p. 269) To my utter astonishment

a simple Google search turned up the relevant portions of the book; published at the site of the Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon, along with the accompanying large list of members. According to Sutton, the list is from the "Illuminati Provincial Report from Utica (i.e., Heidelberg) dated September 1782." (America's Secret Establishment; PDF, no pagination; section titled "The Hegelian Influence On Hall")

Robison and Barruel wrote their paltry lists based upon the available information at the time. During the 1790s investigations were still continuing and more material has since seen the light of day - unfortunately most of it still remains in German. In 1918 Vernon L. Stauffer wrote that there were 96 principle works devoted to the Illuminati. I imagine the number of titles is much higher now. At any rate, we owe Professor Richard van Dülmen a debt of gratitude for making the list a part of the historical record. If anyone would like to have the Dülmen excerpts professionally translated into English, please let me know - I will be more than willing to pay for the service.

Zwack, Baron Franz Xavier von (1755-1843) Zwack, Simon

Cato (also Danaus & Phil.-Strozzi)

Lawyer, Judge; Aulic Counselor, and Weishaupt (Cato was his closest confidant); Counselor of the Regency Prince von Salm; Count (Baron) Montgelas


Lawyer, Aichad

An Intimate Look inside the Illuminati
By 1787 the Illuminati had enormous tentacles inside every branch of authority in Bavaria and greater Germany. The sheer size and scope of the conspiracy alarmed the Duke to no end. They had also spread into France, Italy, Austria, Poland and England - even to America, by their own account. In the third year of operation Weishaupt boasts to Zwack that they have more than a thousand initiates. [AB: 596] Knigge recruits an additional 500 [AB: 649] - mostly masons - very shortly after his initiation in 1780; and by the third edict against the Order the Illuminati were estimated to have between 2000 and 3000 members. [VS] John Robison compiles an interesting statistic concerning the different lodges and locations: Munich, Hesse (many), Ingolstadt, Buchenwerter, Frankfort, Monpeliard, Eichstatt, Stuttgart (3), Hanover, Carlsruhe, Brunswick, Anspach, Calbe, Neuwied (2), Magdeburg, Mentz (2), Cassel, Poland (many), Osnabrueck, Turin, Weimar, England (8), Upper Saxony (several), Scotland (2), Austria (14), Warsaw (2), Westphalia (several), Deuxponts, Heidelberg, Cousel, Mannheim, Treves (2), Strasburg (5), Aix-la-Chappelle (2), Spire, Bartschied, Worms, Bahrenberg, Düsseldorf, Switzerland (many), Rome, Cologne, Naples, Hannibal, Bonn

(4), Livonia (many), Ancona, Courland (many), Florence, Franken Dahl, France, Alsace (many), Holland (many), Vienna (4), Dresden (4), America (several). [JR] The whole plan for governing the Order is reprinted in Barruel's Memoirs …, pp. 541-78. It entails Weishaupt's instructions to his Regents, Local Superiors, Provincials and National Directors. The international character is stressed in a letter to the National Superiors: "In every nation there shall be a National Director associated and in direct communication with our Fathers, the first of whom holds the helm of the Order." [AB: 565] I have created a graphic based on the system described by Weishaupt:

At the helm of course was Weishaupt, the absolute dictator. In order to maintain complete secrecy he conceived a plan which would have been successful had the initiates carried it through without deviation. In two letters, first to Zwack and then to Baader, he explains: "For the present, direct nobody to me but Cortez, that I may have some leisure to digest my speculations, and determine each one's place; for every thing depends on that. My operations with you shall be directed by the following table:

"Immediately under me I have two adepts, into whom I infuse my whole spirit; each of these corresponds with two others, and so on. By this method, and in the simplest way possible, I can inflame and put in motion thousands of men at once. It is by such means that orders are to be transmitted and political operations carried on." Then to Baader, a few days later, he writes: "I have sent to Cato a table (schema) showing how one may
methodically and without much trouble arrange a great multitude of men in the finest order possible. He will

probably have shown it to you; if he has not, ask for it. Here is the figure (then follows the figure). "The spirit of the first, of the most ardent, of the most profound adept daily and incessantly communicates itself to the two A, A; by the one to B, B; by the other to C, C: B B and C C communicate it to the eight following; these to the next sixteen, from thence to the thirty-two and so downwards. I have written a long explanation of it all to Cato. In a word, every man has his Aide-Major, by whose means he immediately acts on all
the others. The whole force first issues from the center and then flows back again to it. Each one subjects, as it

were, to his own person, two men whom he searches to the bottom, whom he observes, disposes, inflames, and drills, as it were, like recruits, that they may hereafter exercise and fire with the whole regiment. The same plan may be followed throughout all the degrees." [AB: 575; emphasis in original]

With that explanation we see the seeds of many revolutionary groups and the way to operate within cells never apprehending the "unknown superiors" directing them from above. Despite the confessions of a few Illuminati, secrecy was rigidly imposed and obeyed. From the very beginning, the initiate is thrust into a culture of total surveillance - on himself, his family and associates. We'll begin from the Novice degree to see how this was accomplished.

Insinuators and Scrutators
The initiate is expected to recruit as many members as possible. A "Brother Insinuator" has as an ultimate goal the job of making new proselytes for the Order. Some are specifically giving this task, but as a general rule everyone is obliged and all the brethren are Insinuators with varying success. Moreover, the laws of the Order decree that each Insinuator is the superior over every new recruit he has brought to the cause. In this manner every Illuminatus "may form to himself a petty empire; and from his littleness, emerge to greatness and power." [AB: 415] From the beginning he is instructed how to judge the character of those he might enlist. This process begins with himself, his immediate family and friends. Each Novice is giving a notebook with tables, which is to be kept and maintained as a journal; he is ordered to write down all his observations. His undertaking is to assiduously pry "into every thing that surrounds him, he must vigilantly observe all persons with whom he becomes acquainted, or whom he meets in company, without exception of relations, friends, enemies, or entire strangers; he must endeavour to discover their strong and their weak side; their passions and prejudices; their intimacies, and above all, their actions, interests, and fortune; in a word, every thing relating to them: and the remarks of every day he must enter in his Diary." [AB: 416] A twofold advantage is gained from this information: first, by the Illuminati and its superiors; second, by the adept himself. Barruel eloquently describes the mutual benefit this scheme has for both parties: "Twice every month he will make a general statement of his observations, and he will transmit it to his superiors. By these means the Order will be informed what men, in every town or village, are friendly or inimical to it. The means of gaining over the one or destroying the other will naturally occur. With respect to the
Insinuator, he will learn how to judge of those who are proper persons to be received or rejected, and he

will carefully insert his reasons for the admission or rejection of those persons in his monthly statements." [Ibid. 416] The Insinuator cannot pursue either Pagans or Jews, and above all he is to "shun the Ex-Jesuits like he would the plague." [AB, NW, VS] The Illuminati had a particular rabid hatred towards the Jesuits, beginning with Weishaupt's own disdain. A whole covert unit was constructed within the Minerval Academies to publish and disseminate anti-Jesuit material. They even had their own printer in Munich to produce new

editions, at their own expense, of propaganda opposing the Jesuits. [AB: 586] Members who are schoolmasters and professors are commissioned to guard against the Jesuits, and to obtain the expulsion of all those discovered. [Ibid. 608] They had great success in this endeavour, and particularly in Ingolstadt:
"Through the intrigues of the Brethren the Jesuits have been dismissed from all the Professorships; we have entirely cleared the University of Ingolstadt of them."

"The Dowager Duchess has modeled her Institute for the Cadets entirely on the plan prepared by the Order. That
house is under our inspection; all its Professors belong to our Order; five of its members have been well provided for, and all the pupils will be ours." [Zwack, on the progress of Illuminism; AB: 611, emphasis in original]

The trial period for a Novice could last from one to three years, depending on the age of the initiate. Secrecy is instilled from the start as the Novice receives his new alias; his characteristic or adoptive name. He is then tasked to write a history of his new patron, to help him understand the qualities and actions that he is to emulate. For Weishaupt, Spartacus is an apt alias; for Goethe, Abaris is particularly appropriate as well. 64 The Novice is also let in on the secret names applied to towns and regions. He learns that "Bavaria, the country of their founder, is denominated Achaia; Swabia, Pannonia; Franconia, Austria, and Tyrol are denoted by Illyria, Egypt, and Peloponnesus; Munich is called Athens; Bamberg, Antioch; Inspruck, Samos; Vienna in Austria, Rome; Wurtzburg, Carthage; Frankfort on the Mein becomes Thebes; and Heidelberg, Utica. Ingolstadt, the natal soil of the Order, was not sufficiently denoted by Ephesus; this privileged town was to be decorated with a more mysterious name, and the profound adepts bestowed on it that of Eleusis." [AB: 429; emphasis in original] To the Illuminati the greatest of all study was the "knowledge of men." Weishaupt himself became very good at psychology and sociological manipulation. The Insinuator - by this time, his Brother Teacher - will examine everything the Novice has written in his journal; and exercises on ancient authors and the heroes of antiquity will help the Novice in constructing a proper outline of those around him. [AB: 431] All the while he is constantly pressed by his Superiors "to propose those whom he may think fit for the Order." While studying the art of knowing himself and others, the Novice fills his journal with every detail; his age, occupation, country and place of residence; what he likes to study, the books in his library, secret writings he may possess; his revenue, his enemies, and reason thereof; outlines of his acquaintances, protectors and friends. [AB: 433] In all, there are seventeen columns to fill, [Ibid. 597] and a second table is subjoined which is reserved for complete descriptions of his family, particularly his father, mother and siblings. 65 The discourse to the next degree says it all: "for men may be turned to any thing by him who knows how to take advantage of their ruling passions." [Ibid. 449] And one might add, by taking advantage of his family's "ruling passions" as well.

Later on, in the Minor Illuminatus degree, Weishaupt admonishes: "Assiduously observe every Brother entrusted to your care; watch him particularly on all occasions where he may be tempted not to be what he ought to be." [AB: 448] Weishaupt is seeking to create the perfect spy in each of them. Upon admission to the Major Illuminatus degree the candidate is told of the code "Nosce te ipsum" (know thyself), and when another Brother pronounces it he is supposed to reply "Nosce alios" (know others). [Ibid. 455] In this degree, the spying is taken to a whole other level. The candidate is told to scrutinize his inferiors in the form of questions about his physiognomy; his countenance; his gait; his language; his education - and each topic has multiple questions to elicit precise descriptions. The "Scrutators," in order to answer the questions posed, gather the facts when the target least expects it. Amazingly, they actually go so far as to follow their prey into his bedroom, "where they will learn whether he is a hard sleeper, whether he dreams, and whether he talks when dreaming; whether he is easily or with difficulty awakened; and should he be suddenly, forcibly, or unexpectedly awakened from his sleep, what impression would it make on him?" [Ibid. 455-56] It is also in the Major Illuminatus degree that the candidate delivers up a sealed history of his life. This is then compared with the tables already in the possession of his superiors - the complete picture drawn up of his person. And if it coincides with the surveillance conducted he is then admitted into the deeper mysteries. [AB: 456] By this time the adept is well accustomed to the investigations, and no objection would be forthcoming. The all-seeing eye of the Order had become habitual.

The "Brethren of Minerva"
I will end part one with a description of the class above that of Novice. The degree of the "Academy of Illuminism," or the "Minerval Schools," was a natural extension of Weishaupt's proclivity to initiate young pliable minds to his cause. It was his wish to establish a sort of "academy of literati" to study the ancients, the art of the scrutator, and to better determine those who had a penchant for the "Mysteries." By these means, in Weishaupt's words, he can "discern those who show a disposition for certain special Doctrines relative to Government or to Religion." [AB: 440] The statutes of the degree state that it "wishes to be considered only as a learned society or academy," and a Pythagorean ideal is most definitely the aim. They are called the Brethren of Minerva. The academy is composed of ten, twelve and sometimes fifteen
Minervals, and directed by a Major Illuminatus. The Illuminati's calendar is marked holy on the days in which

the academy is to meet and they call their meeting place a Church. The gathering is held twice a month, always on the full moon. The Church is preceded by an anti-chamber, "with a strong door armed with bolts, which is to be shut during the time of the meeting; and the whole apartment is to be so disposed, that it shall be impossible for intruders either to see or hear anything that is going forward." [AB: 441]

At the commencement of each meeting, the President reads chosen passages from the Bible, Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius, or Confucius. Barruel notes the care taken to give all the works the same weight and authority. After the lecture, each pupil is questioned on the "books which he has read since the last meeting; on the observations or discoveries he may have made; and on the labours or services toward the progress of the Order." [AB: 441] There are multiple academies for the Minervals, and in each one there is an appropriate library. The Illuminati supply the books with money from the brethren; from the list of books the candidate has said belong to him, which are extracted from his possession if found useful; and third, by any means necessary - theft and robbery being encouraged. The precious volumes are usually stolen from the courts of Princes, Nobles and Religious Orders. Periodically lists are drawn up and the brethren are encouraged to procure them anyway they can: "all these would be of much greater use if they were in our hands. What do those rascals do with all those books?" [AB: 441] Each year the Superiors pose questions to the pupils which they are to answer in the form of dissertations. These are meant for public consumption and the Illuminati have booksellers (like Nicolai) who put the works into circulation. [AB: 442-43] An important symbol for the "Brethren of Minerva" is of course the owl. David Livingstone first proposed a theory to me in the following manner:
In Greece, the dying-god was known as Dionysus, a practice adopted by the Greeks from the worship of Mithras by the Babylonian Magi. Similarly, child sacrifice was also involved in his cult.

Dionysus is interchangeable with Apollo, and Apollo's counterpart is Athene or Minerva, whose symbol is the owl.

Thus the owl became an important Illuminati symbol, and was adapted to the name of one of their grades, the "Minervals".

Likewise, Hegel, who undoubtedly would have been a member, stated:

"When philosophy paints its gray on gray, then has a form of life grown old, and with gray on gray it cannot be rejuvenated, but only known; the Owl of Minerva first takes flight with twilight closing in." - "Preface," Philosophy of Right

And so, the name of the Journal of the Hegel Society of North America is the "Owl of Minerva".

Take note of the mention of Dionysus as being directly linked, through Apollo, to Minerva. The Eleusinian mysteries were revered by the Illuminati above all the ancient practices - and Dionysus is associated with the rites performed at Eleusis.

The "Bird of Minerva" has been a symbol for the goddess of wisdom (Athena/Minerva) for thousands of years. Hegel used it, the Journal of the Hegel Society of America employs the symbol, and the Bohemian Club uses it as well. In the Cremation of Care ceremony, ritualized at the Bohemian Grove, we hear the "Priest" intone: "O thou, great symbol of all mortal wisdom, Owl of Bohemia, we do beseech thee, grant us thy counsel." 66 Turning to Hegel, according to Jacques d'Hondt in Hegel Secret, Hegel and Schelling "were avid readers of a Journal dedicated to the events in France from a more or less Girondist point of view, Minerva, the title of which found its way into Hegel's Philosophy of Right … The engraving on the first issue of Minerva shows the owl of Minerva, which according to d'Hondt is Masonic but which is also the ancient symbol of Athena, the Greek Goddess of wisdom among other things, taking flight from a basket at the top of a monumental column." 67 The correlation with the Illuminati seems obvious in hindsight, but at the time David suggested the connection, I did not know for sure whether the Minerval Degree was meant to allude to Minerva. It does indeed. Each member of the Academy is called a Minerval, but the whole of the school is called the

"Brethren of Minerva." Moreover, the discourse for initiation into the Major Illuminatus degree - the superiors of the Brethren of Minerva - makes the case concrete:
"Seek faithful co-operators, but seek them not in tumults and storms; they are hidden in darkness. Protected by the
shades of night, solitary and silent, or reunited in small numbers, they, docile children, pursue the grand work under the direction of their Superiors. They call aloud to the children of the world, who pass by in the intoxication of pleasure-

how few hearken to them! He alone who has the eye of the bird of Minerva, who has placed his labours under the protection of the star of night, is sure of finding them." [AB: 458; bold emphasis mine]

As if this wasn't enough, later in the book, Barruel makes this matter-of-fact statement: "Weishaupt had adopted the bird of night for his emblem." (p. 582)

Illuminati Conspiracy Part Two: Sniffing out Jesuits - by Terry Melanson, Sept. 12th, 2008

NB: My apologies to those who've been waiting three years for this "Part Two." As many of you know, since the posting of my "Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: Exegesis on the Available Evidence" in August 2005, I have been hard at work on a book about the Bavarian Illuminati. So, necessarily, I had to put on hold the planned three part series. As the book is finished and scheduled for a November 2008 release, I am free to proceed. (Part two is not what I had originally planned on writing, but nonetheless, it is original and distinct from the book.) - TM

Orientation: The Bavarian Illuminati were the antagonists of the Jesuits, and vice versa


have chosen to critique parts of | this webpage | as a means to inform the reader on certain facts

essential to a proper understanding of the 18th Century Bavarian Order of Illuminati. The other reason is this: a particularly rabid and extremely annoying "Jesuits-rule-the-world" theorist who spams many YahooGroups (always in the customary all-caps shouting mode), had deigned this "Religious Counterfeits" webpage as the proper authority - I am not sure why - on the following theories: 1) that Adam Weishaupt was a Jesuit - not just Jesuit-trained, but a Jesuit priest; and 2) that the Illuminati, therefore, are synonymous with the Jesuits and, in fact, the two are the same (that is, the former was merely the organ of the latter, and the proof of said assertion is the fact that Weishaupt was supposedly a Jesuit himself). To someone who has even a modicum of familiarity with the 18th-Century European Enlightenment, this is indeed a preposterous claim; it's based upon a falsehood - Weishaupt being a Jesuit - and displays ignorance of the history of the period to which we speak. What follows is a quote/rebuttal format which will hopefully put to rest certain erroneous assertions being claimed by the Jesuits=Illuminati theorists.

Quote: There have always been Occultists who practiced the process of Illumination, but the term "Illuminati" was

used first in the 15th Century by enthusiasts in the Occult Arts, signifying those who claimed to possess "light" directly communicated from some higher source, through mysticism.

The first occurrence of "Illuminati" was not in the 15th century. "Illuminati" has been used by followers of Mani, or Manes (Manichaeism; the apostles of light) - they called him the supreme illuminator. The Virgin Mary, too, was given the appellation "Maria Illuminatrix" and the "illuminated/illuminator." Jewish Kabbalists were called Illuminati. And lest the reader get the impression it is only used in the occult or by the Roman Catholic Church, be reminded that in Calvin's Institutes, the theologian mentions twenty times the word Illuminati and Illuminatus, four times (see Carl F. H. Henry, God, Revelation and Authority (Vol. IV), Good News
Publishers, 1999, p. 290; the statistical calculation of the words was compiled by the first editor of the magazine Christianity
Today, Carl. F. H. Henry, and presented at the above-cited page, along with other keywords in Calvin's Latin texts such as

"Illuminated" and "Illuminate.")

Quote: We find the name "Illuminati" in Spain about the end of the 15th Century. The Founder of the Jesuit Order,

Ignatius Loyola classed himself as a member of the Illuminati. And, from time to time, here and there, small bodies of those called "The Illuminati", sometimes known as Rosicrucians" rose into publicity for a short period.

Yes, the Alumbrados (or Aluminados) literally means Illuminati - dubbed so because of their Gnostic, Kabbalistic (some were Jewish conversos), mystical, almost Quietist tendencies. But Loyola didn't, as is dishonestly claimed, class "himself as a member." In fact, just the opposite - he denied it outright. He was questioned on a couple of occasions by the Inquisition on exactly this point, and each time he vehemently refuted the charges. (I don't believe him, myself. But I would be lying if I claimed Loyola had "classed himself a member.") These Alumbrados have no relation whatsoever to the Illuminatenorden of the 18th Century. The former were mystically inclined ascetics, while the latter was a child, through and through, of the rationalist
philosophes of the Enlightenment and the "Aufklärung" popularphilosophen in German speaking lands.

Quote: Weishaupt was a Jesuit Priest who was involved in "Illumination" or Witchcraft.

Not true, on both counts. As I had written before, in the notes to "Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: Exegesis on the Available Evidence" in 2005, "Weishaupt was indeed taught by the Jesuits, though he himself wasn't one of them. Many prominent thinkers - such as Voltaire, Descartes, and Diderot - were trained by Jesuits, but I've yet to see the same inaccuracy applied to them." Don't take my word for it, though. Feel free to consult real historians on the Bavarian Illuminati: René Le Forestier, Les Illuminés de Bavière et la francmaçonnerie allemande (1914; PhD dissertation); Leopold Engel, Geschichte des Illuminaten-ordens (1906);

Peggy Pawlowski, Der Beitrag Johann Adam Weishaupts zur Pädagogik des Illuminatismus (2004; PhD

dissertation). Also, in addition to Peggy Pawlowski, see the work of the three living experts on the Illuminati: Dr. Hermann Schüttler, Reinhard Markner, and Dr. Monika Neugebauer-Wölk. None of the foregoing historians repeat the falsehood that Weishaupt was a Jesuit; and neither do Barruel (1798) or Robison (1798), even Vernon Stauffer (1916). There's no need to argue the point further. The Illuminati contemporaries, and the later experts on the subject, are unanimous. They get it right that Weishaupt was only educated by the Jesuits, had never been one himself, and was in fact pathologically hostile toward the Jesuits or Jesuitism - anything to do with monasticism, religious absolutism, or "superstitious folly" and obscurantism. Before and after the suppression of the Society of Jesus in 1773, his quarrels with the Jesuit staff at the University of Ingolstadt were legendary. Another interesting fact - as opposed to the made up ones - is that the feeling was mutual. So much so, that the real persecuting hand behind the suppression of the Illuminati in Bavaria descended from the fanatic "ex"-Jesuit and court confessor, Ignaz Franck. The latter also happened to be the head of the Munich Circle of the Golden and Rosy Cross (Gold- und Rosenkreuzer) - thus the rumours of a joint Rosicrucian-Jesuit plot to destroy the Illuminati doesn't seem so far fetched.* The Rosicrucians at that time had adhered to a zealous type of mystical conservatism. Hence the basic dialectic of the Enlightenment was this: Philosophes + Freemasonry + Illuminati (opposing) Jesuits + the Church + Rosicrucians. Anything challenging this basic analysis - easily apprehended even to a newbie of 18th century European history - and you'd better come armed with incredibly persuasive evidence.
* More details can be found in my forthcoming book, Perfectibilists: The 18th Century Bavarian Order of the Illuminati; but if you'd

like a head-start, consult René Le Forestier, Les Illuminés de Bavière et la Franc-Maçonnerie Allemande [Paris: 1914], Archè reprint, 2001; and Klaus Epstein, The Genesis of German Conservatism, Princeton University Press, 1966.

As far as Religious Counterfeits' wishful charge of "witchcraft," one only need consult the Original Writings of Adam Weishaupt himself to realize that he had nothing but contempt for such things. The letters between members of the Order were confiscated by force, so the opinions expressed therein were genuine, candid and real. In letters to his subordinates, Weishaupt reveals himself as an extreme rationalist; a worshipper of "reason," as it was defined by the radical anti-obscurantist philosophers of the Enlightenment (viz. Montesquieu, Rousseau, d'Holbach, Helvétius, even Hume, Adam Ferguson and Adam Smith).

Quote: Ingolstadt University in Bavaria had been a Jesuit Institution for many years. Weishaupt was professor of Canon

Law there at Ingolstadt. He wanted to see the Jesuit Order come back into power, and eventually, he published a Plan to help the Jesuits take over the world.

Weishaupt was an enemy of the Jesuits, as was the whole of the Illuminati itself. One can even faithfully describe the entire enterprise as a well-oiled propaganda machine intent on influencing public opinion against the Jesuit Order, and everything it stood for. They even had their own printers churning out copies

of anti-Jesuit classics;* and their greatest recruits for the Order were those who'd already been known as master Jesuit hunters extraordinaire - Bode, Nicolai and Knigge.
* See Einige Originalschriften des Illuminatenordens, p. 221; cf. Augustin Barruel, Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism [1798],

Real-View-Books Classics Reprint, 2002, p. 586.

Weishaupt didn't publish "a plan to help the Jesuits take over the World," either. Nonsense! Weishaupt had a plan alright, but it was for the Illuminati (after having vanquished the Jesuits completely and utterly) to be the sole arbitrator over the direction of the entire Enlightenment: an anarchistic, Rousseauianprimitivist, Archimedean lever for social reorganization. Weishaupt was a narcissistic megalomaniac, and this was the main reason why his second in command, Baron von Knigge, had finally quit in a huff. Furthermore, Weishaupt's plan wasn't published by him; it was published by the Bavarian authorities after raids into the domiciles of von Zwack (1786) and de Bassus (1787), respectively: Einige Originalschriften des
Illuminatenordens (1787), and Nachtrag von weitern Originalschriften, welche die Illuminatensekte (1787).

Quote: This Plan is laid out in a book called "Proofs of a Conspiracy" by John Robison, in 1798, and is discussed in other

books as well: "Weishaupt had long been scheming the establishment of an Association or Order, which in time, should govern the world! In his first fervor and high expectations, he hinted to several ex-Jesuits the probability of their recovering, under a new name, the influence which they formerly possessed, and of being again of great service to society, by directing the education of youth of distinction, now emancipated from all civil and religious prejudices." -Proofs of a Conspiracy, John Robison, pg. 59

This reveals the author's dishonesty. The quote is taken out of context. Here's what should have been cited, pp. 58-9 (the short excerpt above italicized, and with my own bold emphasis).
... the emancipation of his young hearers from the terrors of superstition. I suppose also that this was the more agreeable to him, as it procured him the triumph over the Jesuits, with whom he had long struggled for the
direction of the university.

This was in 1777. Weishaupt had long been scheming the establishment of an Association or Order, which, in time, should
govern the world. In his first fervour and high expectations, he hinted to several Ex-Jesuits the probability of their recovering, under a new name, the influence which they formerly possessed, and of being again of great service to society, by directing the education of youth of distinction, now emancipated from all civil and religious prejudices. He prevailed on some to join

him, but they all retracted but two. After this disappointment Weishaupt became the implacable enemy of the
Jesuits; and his sanguine temper made him frequently lay himself open to their piercing eye, and drew on him

their keenest resentment, and at last made him the victim of their enmity.

Now, with the quote fully contextualized, the meaning is clear. Robison basically reiterated what I have already said herein. Robison's points are thus: 1) there was a struggle with the Jesuits at the University of

Ingolstadt; 2) Weishaupt's liberal teaching methods had gained him the upper-hand as far as the indoctrination of young minds; 3) he instituted his Illuminati as a means to maintain supremacy - though, unbelievably, as has already been pointed out by many, Robison gets the date wrong of when the Illuminati had actually been instituted (1777, as opposed to 1776); 4) he had solicited some "ex"-Jesuits, enticing them with a promise of gaining a semblance of the power which they had previously held; 5) in the end most didn't fall for it - except for two; and 6) this caused more acute anti-Jesuitism ("became the
implacable enemy of the Jesuits") on the part of Weishaupt, and ditto for the Jesuits.

It is not clear who the Jesuits were that Weishaupt had tried to recruit, but one thing is for sure: his greatest mistake was allowing the likes of Johann Sulpitius Marquis de Cosandey (Xenophon=alias), Joseph von Utzschneider (Hellanicus Lesbius/Seneca), Georg Grünberger (Archytas), Vitus Renner (Anaximander) and Georg Maximilian Johann von Dillis (Timagoras) to join - all of whom had extensive connections with the Jesuits and/or were priests (such as the first and the last), and were, in the end, as defectors and denunciators, the cause of the persecutions of the Order in Bavaria. Another quote from Robison (a letter from Zwack to Weishaupt) which "Religious Counterfeits" neglected to show its readers, is: "By the activity of our Brethren [the Illuminati], the Jesuits have been kept out of all the
professorial chairs at Ingolstadt, and our friends [the Illuminati and Masons] prevail … We have been very successful against the Jesuits, and brought things to such a bearing, that their revenues, such as the Mission,

the Golden Alms, the Exercises, and the Conversion Box, are now under the management of our friends"
(Robison, op. cit., p. 114; emphasis mine). And this: "Philo [Baron von Knigge] had gained his good opinion by the

violent attack which he had published on the Jesuits and Rosycrucians [sic] by the orders of Spartacus

[Weishaupt]" (Ibid., p. 161; emphasis mine). It doesn't get any more straightforward than this. The mutual antagonism was palpable, and had achieved legendary status by the time Robison wrote those words more than ten years later.


What we have just learned is that the real facts about the Illuminati were the exact opposite of what the Jesuits=Illuminati purveyors would have you believe. By selective quoting and convenient omission, the Religious Counterfeits' have deprived their readers of the fact that Robison had an opinion (based upon primary documents and contemporary knowledge) which was in complete contradiction to that of their own. This is a favorite tactic of the really bad conspiracy theorists; whole volumes - an entire house of cards - are built upon this ruse.

Eric Jon Phelps utilizes the same technique. In his Vatican Assassins (p. 225), for instance, he ostensibly quotes from Nesta Webster. However, the excerpt omits some crucial remarks, which, if they had been left in, would have challenged his theories, even to the point of having the opposite desired effect. What follows is a side-by-side comparison of the relevant material. On the left as it appears in Webster's
Secret Societies & Subversive Movements, and on the right as Phelps has quoted it.

Secret Societies & Subversive Movements [1924], A&B

Vatican Assassins, Second Edition, 2004, p. 225:

Publishers Group, 1998, pp. 196-7:

That Weishaupt was not the originator of the system he named Illuminism will be already apparent to every reader of the present work… How did these Oriental methods penetrate to the Bavarian professor? According to certain writers, through the Jesuits. The fact that Weishaupt had been brought up by this Order has provided the enemies of the Jesuits with the argument that they were the secret inspirers of the Illuminati. Mr. Gould, indeed, has attributed most of the errors of the latter to this source; Weishaupt, he writes, incurred "the implacable enmity of the Jesuits, to whose intrigues he was incessantly exposed." In reality
precisely the opposite was the case, for, as we shall see, it was Weishaupt who perpetually intrigued against the Jesuits.

"That Weishaupt was not the originator of the system he named 'Illuminism' will be already apparent to every reader of the present work . . . How did these Oriental methods penetrate to the Bavarian professor? According to certain writers, through the Jesuits. The fact that Weishaupt had been brought up by this Order has provided the enemies of the Jesuits with the argument that they were the secret inspirers of the Illuminati . . . That Weishaupt did, however, draw to a certain extent on Jesuit methods of training is recognized even by Barruel, himself a Jesuit [and the most influential historian of the French Revolution], who, quoting Mirabeau, says that Weishaupt, 'admired above all those laws, that regime of the Jesuits, which, under one head [the Jesuit General], made men dispersed over the universe tend towards the same goal . . . ' " [Emphasis added (by Phelps)]


Weishaupt did, however, draw to a certain extent on Jesuit methods of training is recognized even by Barruel, himself a Jesuit, who, quoting Mirabeau, says that Weishaupt "admired above all those laws, that régime of the Jesuits, which, under one head, made men dispersed over the universe tend towards the same goal; he felt that one could imitate their
methods whilst holding views diametrically opposed."



What a candid writer would do in a situation like this would be to quote the entirety of the excerpt. If the author's theory is really all it's cracked up to be, they should easily be able to reason away the appearance

of these contradictory views. Instead, Phelps twists the quote to suit his own agenda: Webster was saying the exact opposite to what Phelps had attempted to insinuate. Further, Webster was no fool. She intelligently and correctly assessed the situation:
The fact is that the accusation of Jesuit intrigue behind secret societies has emanated principally from the secret societies themselves and would appear to have been a device adopted by them to cover their own tracks. No good evidence has ever been brought forward in support of their contention. ... The Marquis de Luchet, who was no friend of the Jesuits, shows the absurdity of confounding their aims with those of either the Freemasons or the Illuminati, and describes all three as animated by wholly different purposes.

In all these questions it is necessary to seek a motive. I have no personal interest in defending the Jesuits, but I ask: what motive could the Jesuits have in forming or supporting a conspiracy directed against all thrones and altars? It has been answered me that the Jesuits at this period cared nothing for thrones and altars, but only for temporal power; yet--even accepting this unwarrantable hypothesis--how was this power to be exercised except through thrones and altars? Was it not through princes and the Church that the Jesuits had been able to bring their influence to bear on affairs of state? In an irreligious Republic, as events afterwards proved, the power of the whole clergy was bound to be destroyed. The truth is then, that, far from abetting the Illuminati, the Jesuits were
their most formidable opponents, the only body of men sufficiently learned, astute, and well organized to outwit the schemes of Weishaupt. In suppressing the Jesuits it is possible that the Old Régime removed the only barrier capable of

resisting the tide of revolution.

Weishaupt indeed, as we know, detested the Jesuits, and took from them only certain methods of discipline, of

ensuring obedience or of acquiring influence over the minds of his disciples; his aims were entirely different. (Webster, op. cit., pp. 198-9; emphasis mine)

This is what you call a measured and rational summation. It conforms to the historical facts in every conceivable way. Unlike the "Religious Counterfeits" and Phelps, Webster had read the Original Writings of the Illuminati. And, as I've said before, these writings - confiscated against their will - make it clear that Illuminati intrigue was constantly being directed against the, incalculably-hated, Sons of Loyola. Ironically, in this respect, Phelps et al. are brothers in arms with Weishaupt, the Illuminati, radical Freemasonry, and especially the later 19th century occult movement of Theosophy. (Madame Blavatsky's modus operandi was in
keeping with the tradition of her antecedents. Her fear and hatred of the Jesuits bordered on the pathological: see, for instance, "Theosophy of Jesuitism," "Jesuitry and Masonry (1 of 6)," "Jesuitry and Masonry (2 of 6)," "Jesuitry and Masonry (3 of 6)," "Jesuitry and Masonry (4 of 6)," "Jesuitry and Masonry (5 of 6)," "Jesuitry and Masonry (6 of 6)," and "Was Cagliostro a 'Charlatan'?")


The Stratagems of Weishaupt, Knigge, Nicolai, and Bode
Anti-Jesuits alleged that Jesuits were engaged in a vast conspiracy aimed to destroy the new revolutionary order. Jesuits were for the first time accused of having infiltrated Freemasonry, apparently with the purpose of restoring Catholicism to its former glories. Similarities in ritual forms, the hierarchy of membership, and the notion of blind obedience to superiors, as well as claims that the Masons derived from the Catholic Knights Templar and were linked to the Stuart pretender, made such claims plausible. Anti-Jesuits, as before, included both Protestants hostile to Catholicism, led by the publicists, Friedrich Nicolai and Johann Joachim Christoph Bode, and Enlightened Catholics, especially associated with the Illuminati, a secret society that promoted secularism.
- Roisin Healy, The Jesuit Specter in Imperial Germany (BRILL, 2003), p. 32.

Opposition to the Jesuits was a central issue for many of the Masonic subgroupings; the Rosicrucians had arisen "almost as a mirror image of the Jesuit Order"; and Adam Weishaupt had conceived the Order of Illuminati as an anti-Jesuit organization modeled upon Jesuitical methods and organizational forms. The Jesuits responded in kind: it was widely believed that the suppression of the Illuminati in Bavaria was instigated by them.
- Maynard Solomon, Mozart: A Life (HarperPerennial, 1996), p. 328.

On 13 March, 1778, Adam Weishaupt (Spartacus) wrote a letter to Maximilian Balthasar Ludwig Edler von Merz (Tiberius), one of the five original members of the Illuminati and an Areopagite. One section reads: "We have … in Munich our own printer. It is from there that you'll soon receive, printed at our expense, the Relatio de strategmatis et sophismatis Polchis S. I. by Alphonsus de Vargas" (Einige Originalschriften des
Illuminatenordens, p. 221).

That is, Relatio ad Reges et Principes Christianos De Stratagematis et Sophismatis politicis

Societatis Jesu ad Monarchiam orbis terrarum sibi confirmandam [A Report to the Christian Kings and Princes on

the Stratagems and Political Sophisms of the Jesuits For World Domination]; or, as Juan Antonio Llorente has translated its title, An Exposition made by Alphonsa de Vargas to the Christian Kings and Princes, of the
Stratagems and political Artifices which the Members of the Society of Jesus employ to establish a universal Monarchy in their favour, a Work which proves the deceit of the Jesuits towards the Kings and Nations who have received them favourably; their Perfidy and Disobedience, even to the Pope, and the immoderate Desire of Innovation which they have always shewn in Matters of Religion (see The History of the Inquisition of Spain, from the Time of Its Establishment to the Reign
of Ferdinand VII, London: G. B. Whittaker, 1826, p. 280).

First printed at Rome in 1636, Alphonsus de Vargas was one of the pseudonyms of Caspar Schoppe [or Gaspar Scioppius] (1576-1649); and his above mentioned work was recommended reading for all Illuminati initiates. By 1778, Schoppe's Stratagems and Political Sophisms of the Jesuits was a classic and a much soughtafter work of anti-Jesuitism. Weishaupt, by printing a new edition at the expense of the Illuminati, had put into motion one of the Illuminati's own Strategmatis: the Jesuits must be discredited, exposed, hunted and

driven out. Weishaupt's personal war with the Society of Jesus had already begun at Ingolstadt University. Now, with the Illuminati in full operation, the growing assets of the Order could be put to use.

The Kassel Strict Observance Lodge 'Zum gekrönten Löwen' [of the Crowned Lion] medallion 1743

In July, 1780, the Illuminati had managed to insinuate its most zealous initiate thus far: Adolph Franz Friedrich Ludwig Baron von Knigge (1752 Bredenbeck, Germany - 1796 Bremen, Germany). Knigge (Philo
Judaeus), having been extremely fascinated with secret societies and occultism, applied for membership in

Freemasonry at the earliest possible age. The Kassel Strict Observance Lodge 'Zum gekrönten Löwen' [of the Crowned Lion] accepted him into the fold in 1772, and in 1779 he became a knight of the rite of Strict Observance (alias, 'Eques a Cygno' [Knight of the Swan]). During his formative Masonic years before joining the Illuminati, Knigge had become acquainted with Mason and alchemist, Marburg professor Friedrich Joseph Wilhelm Schröder (1733-78). Schröder imbued him with enthusiasm for the occult sciences. On Schröder, Knigge had said: "What man would not have been fired with zeal for theosophy, magic, and alchymy, in the company of Scroeder [sic]? These were the mysteries of the Strict Observance, in which I was a firm believer, and practised all the evocations of spirits, and other occult ceremonies of the Order!" (In George Oliver, The Historical Landmarks and Other Evidences of
Freemasonry: Explained in a Series of Practical Lectures, with Copious Notes, Vol. II (New York: Masonic Publishing and Manufacturing,

1867), p. 53 n. 79; cf. Le Forestier, op. cit., p. 210 and Augustin Barruel, op.cit., p. 621.)

Through his correspondences with Johann Georg Wendelstadt - a future high-ranking member of the Illuminati himself,* and also a member of the Strict Observance - it is clear that in 1778/79 Knigge was obsessed with research into alchemy and was dedicated to chasing down old manuscripts in hopes of finding the key to transmuting dross into gold - an apprentice of the Great Work. Having no luck on his own, in August 1778 he decided upon applying for membership into the Golden and Rosy Cross. Schröder was well-connected with the Rosicrucian Order (probably a member) and served as a liaison. Knigge was given a list of preliminary questions for potential candidates. Schröder had assured his friend that, soon, at the proper place and time, Knigge would meet with a member and take the required entry exam. The

Golden and Rosy Cross, however, rejected his application and, according to Le Forestier, "he would have to be content with remaining a member of the Strict Observance" (p. 211).
* In Hermann Schüttler, Die Mitglieder des Illuminatenordens 1776-1787/93 (Munich: Ars Una 1991), p. 164.

Baron von Knigge

Knigge resented the deception of the Rosicrucians, renounced his foolish reveries in alchemy, and was thenceforth determined to radically reform Freemasonry. He condemned the occult sciences to his brother Masons, loudly protested against would-be gold-makers, and attempted to have any mention of alchemy banned within the Strict Observance. Seeking another route - as far away from the occult arts as he could it was at this time that he developed a primitivist Utopian (socialist) worldview, which, unbeknownst to him at the time, was similar to the ideology of Adam Weishaupt. As historian G. P. Gooch had put it: "The dream of founding a new Order had taken root in his mind; but when he was told that such an Order was already in existence, he asked to be initiated, and brought a number of disillusioned Masons with him" (Studies in German History, London, 1948, p. 66). Knigge's insinuator was Constantin Marchese di Costanzo (Diomedes), a member of the Illuminati's Areopagites. Weishaupt was well-pleased with the recruitment of Knigge, who had plenty of connections not only in Freemasonry but within the Hanau court as well. Soon, Weishaupt was personally corresponding with his rising star, even getting a lesson or two on the intrigues and rituals of modern Freemasonry (Knigge subsequently restructured the higher grades of the Illuminati to better incorporate certain features of Masonic nomenclature). In wasn't long after that Weishaupt encouraged Knigge - and supplied him with the materials - to publish a series of articles on the intrigues of the Jesuits. In March 1781, three articles by Knigge were printed in the journal of the respected Göttingen professor August Ludwig Schlözer (1735-1809). Volumes 8 and 9 of A.L.

Schlözer's Briefwechsel meist historischen und politischen Inhalts included the articles from Knigge; the most

important of which, from the standpoint of Weishaupt, was Tentatives des ex-Jésuites pour rétablir en Bavière la
barbarie et l'Ordre des Jésuites [The ex-Jesuits' attempts to return barbarity and the Order of the Jesuits to

Bavaria]. It admonished the Elector of Bavaria, Karl Theodor to open his eyes toward the machinations of the Jesuits, especially the intrigue at Ingolstadt University. Three extensive documents were included as proof. There was a report signed by four Ingolstadt professors in the faculty of theology, protesting against the pretensions of ex-Jesuit Benedict Stattler (1728-97), who, by then, was already an outspoken enemy of the Illuminati. The professors decried the fact that Stattler, who should have been thrown out after the suppression of the Jesuits in 1773, was soon after appointed repetitor and in 1780, actually promoted to professor of dogmatics; that the ex-Jesuits now had a total of seven professors on the Ingolstadt faculty when before the suppression of the Order, they had had only three! The next attached-document contained another sharp attack against the Jesuitism of Stattler, specifically mentioning the efforts of Weishaupt and professor Stehler to combat and maneuver against it. And the last document claimed that the "Jesuits sought to reestablish their Novitiate under another name and have propagandized in the monasteries" (Le Forestier, p. 222-3). At the behest of Weishaupt and the Illuminati, Knigge wrote two more pamphlets which were published in 1781: Avertissement aux princes allemands, pour les mettre en garde contre l'esprit et le poignard des Jésuites [A Warning to the German Princes to guard against the spirit and dagger of the Jesuits] and Ueber Jesuiten,
Freymaurer und deutsche Rosencreutzer [The Jesuits, Freemasons and the German Rosicrucians]. In order to

give the writings more weight, in the latter publication Knigge had used a pseudonym: Joseph Aloys Maier, a supposed ex-member of the Jesuits. Ueber Jesuiten, Freymaurer was composed of three chapters. The first contained "remarks on the perverse and dangerous principles of the former Society of Jesus," including a sketch of its history and an outline of its members. The second chapter contained a letter on the profane teachings of the Freemasons, and attributed to a former member. The last contained research on the veracity and supposed authenticity of the German Golden and Rosy Cross. The chapter on the Jesuits was culled from documents provided to Knigge by the Illuminati; eleven pamphlets in all, one of which was Louis-René de Caradeuc de La Chalotais' 1762 report to the Parlement de Rennes which was the catalyst for the 1764 expulsion of the Jesuits in France. Knigge was being used by the hierarchy of the Illuminati. He had significant skills as a writer already, and was thus the perfect choice to pen and publish the anti-Jesuitical screeds: for if he wanted to gain the trust of his new "brotherhood," he'd better do as he was told. Not only had Knigge written against the enemies of the Illuminati, but he blossomed into the greatest recruiter for the Order (some 500 members, by his own account), while personally reorganizing the system of degrees. For all his efforts - a veritable superstar compared to everyone else - Weishaupt's only reward

was to constantly talk about him behind his back. Weishaupt was obviously threatened by Knigge's popularity within the Order, and by 1783 their mutual disdain had finally come to a head. Two months before Knigge resigned in disgust, he wrote a letter to Illuminatus Franz Xaver von Zwack (Cato) on February 25, 1783. His frustration is palpable; his threats serious:
At the behest of Spartacus, I wrote against the ex-Jesuits and the Rosicrucians; I hounded men who had done me no harm; I caused disarray in the Strict Observance and drew the best of them to us; I gave them a great idea of the dignity of the Order, its power, its age, the excellence of its leaders, of the perfect fit for [Strict Observance's] senior members, the importance of the knowledge they possessed and its righteous intentions; these people, who now show so much activity in our favour, but remain very committed to religiosity, feared that we intended to spread deism: I have therefore tried to convince them that the Grand Chiefs [of the Illuminati] had no such intention. However, little by little, I do what I please. Let us suppose, then:

1. That I let the Jesuits and the Rosicrucians know who is persecuting them; 2. That I reveal, if only to a few people, the small, insignificant origin of the Order; 3. That I prove to them, by my designs, that I have established part of the degrees myself; 4. That I tell them how, after what I have done for the cause, I must endure mistreatment; 5. That I make known to them the Jesuitical character of the man who perhaps leads us all by the nose, makes use of us for his ambitious schemes, while we sacrifice all the time as often as his obstinacy requires; perhaps what is to fear from such a man, and such a machine that may or may not be hiding Jesuits; 6. That I give assurance to those searching for secrets to expect nothing; 7. That I reveal the secret principles of the General [Weishaupt] to whom religion is overrated; 8. That I discovered how much this work is new and the weak bases upon which it relies; 9. That I draw the attention of the Lodges to a hidden Association behind which lies the Illuminati; 10. 11. That I align myself anew with Princes and Freemasons; Furthermore, that I find a more solid plan, less selfish, more enlightened, based entirely upon

honesty and liberty; that I initiate the best minds with whom I am still acquainted; that in every area I'll secretly initiate recruits [already] insinuated by the Illuminati, so that thereafter I would be well-informed; 12. That even in Greece [Bavaria] I would give information to certain people, in addition to disclosing

the founder and all the rest; 13. That I sound the alarm in Rome [Vienna] through the intermediaries of Princes, to Numenius and

the Rosicrucians!
Nachtrag von weitern Originalschriften, welche die Illuminatensekte, I, pp. 112-14

Threat #5 is probably tantalizing to the Jesuits=Illuminati crowd. So be it; at least I didn't suppress it. I offer but one observation: paranoia is the one common denominator of any secret society worth its salt! Admittedly, in terms of despotism and totalitarian proclivities, Weishaupt had out-Jesuited the Jesuits. Number thirteen is the most significant. The Rosicrucians - who had already openly declared war on the Illuminati - were perhaps even more detested than the Jesuits. Vienna was one of their strongholds. Numenius (Count Franz Joseph von Kolowrat-Liebensteinsky) was a recent recruit in the Illuminati; was well-connected with the Imperial court; and had been entangled with the entire milieu of Viennese Rosicrucianism. And Weishaupt, with trademark subterfuge, made it his pet project to try and cure the noble of his mystical inclinations. To threaten to reveal the secrets of the Illuminati to the Rosicrucians was more serious than spilling the beans to Jesuits.


Christoph Friedrich Nicolai (Lucianus): Novice, March 1782; Illuminatus Minor, April 1782; Regent and Prefect of Berlin, 1784

Another Illuminatus, Christoph Friedrich Nicolai (1733-1811), picked up where Knigge left off; the latter had even insinuated the former into the Illuminati in March 1782. As an introduction, here's a brief sketch from Klaus Epstein (op cit., p. 40; emphasis mine):
[Nicolai] was ... a prolific and gifted writer, and above all the possessor of an uncanny instinct concerning what the German reading public wanted at any specific time. His didactic novels lampooned with equal vigor intolerant orthodoxy, mystical pietism, romantic enthusiasm, and manipulative Rosicrucianism; his main phobia,
open and veiled, was the Jesuits, whom he feared in a manner suggesting a pathological obsession.

Nicolai had of course been the longtime editor of the ADB (Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek), extant from 17651806. A mammoth undertaking, this publication functioned as the heart of the German/Prussian Enlightenment itself. For forty years the ADB reviewed and critiqued nearly the entire prose output of the time. Nicolai seemed to be even-handed in most areas, except for two: critical philosophy and matters relating to Catholicism. On these two points Nicolai decreed the ADB take an unmitigated ideological stance. In correspondence with Albrecht Georg Walch about the latter's intention on reviewing for the ADB some new books originating in Catholic Würzburg, for instance, Nicolai had admonished: "we must view matters from a Protestant rather than a Catholic perspective." He reminded Walsh of the "incredible stupidity that still prevails among Catholics"; and while remarking on a new book by Catholic historian Michael Ignatz Schmidt (1736-1794), in which he judged the Reformation "in a most irresponsible manner," Nicolai remarked, "[t]his is unforgivable ... and we Protestants must contradict such things, so that prejudices are not once again introduced in place of the truth" (in Pamela Eve Selwyn, Everyday Life in the German
Book Trade: Friedrich Nicolai as Bookseller and Publisher in the Age of Enlightenment, Penn State Press, 2000, p. 267).

In the exact time frame of Nicolai's insinuation into the Illuminati (early 1782), he had also "started the campaign of the Berlin Enlighteners against what they perceived as the Catholic threat against the Enlightenment,"* by publishing his pseudo-historical book on the Knights Templar: Versuch über die
Beschuldigungen, welche dem Tempelherrenorden gemacht worden, und über dessen Geheimnis; nebst einem Anhang über das Enstehen der Freimäurergesellschaft [roughly: Essay on the Accusations against the Templars,

and the Secret of the Order; with a Dissertation on the Origins of Freemasonry]. It included the oft-claimed Templar origins of Freemasonry as well as endorsing the then-prevailing anti-Catholic, Masonic theory that Jesuits had tampered with the high degrees of Freemasonry (ala the Young Pretender, the Jacobites, Chevalier Ramsay, the "Scottish" degrees or Ecossais Lodges, and the "Unknown Superiors" of the Templarobsessed Rite of Strict Observance).
* Karl Friedrich Bahrdt, The Edict of Religion: A Comedy; And, The Story and Diary of My Imprisonment, eds. John Christian Laursen,

Johan Van Der Zande, Lexington Books, 2000, p. 67n.5

In turn, Nicolai's collaborators at the popular Berlinische Monatsschrift [Berlin Monthly Journal] started publishing material against "crypto-Catholics" around 1784. "The argument," writes Masonic historian Alain Bernheim, 33°, "began with the alleged secret influence of the Jesuits' Order upon protestant circles and developed in attributing them the salvation of the Strict Observance by the Clerics. The Monatsschrift was foremost in the story together with Nicolai and Bode." Also, in January 1785, the Monatsschrift published an attack against the crypto-Jesuitism of a high-degree member of the Strict Observance, Lutheran pastor Johann August Starck. It was a veiled attack - for those in the know - referring to him as "a theologian wellknown for his writings, about whom it is said almost openly that he is not only affiliated to the Jesuits but actually belongs to the Jesuits of the fourth class who must take special vows in order to be sent on special missions" (Bernheim, op. cit.)

The Berlinische Monatsschrift was the official organ of the secret society known as the Berlin Wednesday Society ('Mittwochsgesellschaft'; 1783-98) internally referred to as the Society of Friends of Enlightenment ('Gesellschaft der Freunde der Aufklärung'). Nicolai was one of the twelve founding members of the society, which soon included a few other Illuminati (von Leuchsenring and von Goeckingk), along with the most famous names of the Berlin Enlightenment. Their goal was to fight obscurantism - viz. theocracy, Jesuitism, Rosicrucianism, orthodoxy, etc. - and effect public policy in favour of the rationalist ideals of the
Popularphilosophen. (See my forthcoming book.)

The Berlinische Monatsschrift's most successful campaign against the so-called crypto-Jesuits began in its March 1788 issue with the publication of some diaries by Charlotte von der Recke. Supposedly, she was a former co-Mason in the Egyptian rite of Count Cagliostro. Recke accused Cagliostro of being a "dangerous Jesuit" who had cast his mystic spell on the credulous. Later, the diaries were published in Russian "with a preface by the German editor, Nicolai, who reasserted and supported the author's thesis" (Raffaella
Faggionato, A Rosicrucian Utopia in Eighteenth-Century Russia: The Masonic Circle of N.I. Novikov, Springer, 2005, p. 191). Nicolai

soon published another book from Recke, this time for his insatiable readership in Germany. The Berlin Enlightenment's favorite whipping-boy, Starck, was her newfound enemy.* The book was excerpted in installments (1788-9) in the Berlinische Monatsschrift. According to Raffaella Faggionato, Recke accused the mystic Mason of "allegedly planning a Catholic Jesuit restoration hidden beneath the mystical and magical show of the clerico-Templar doctrine that he was propagating." (Ibid.)
* Starck would have his revenge, however. He subsequently published one of the most convincing tomes of anti-Illuminati

literature then extant; his Der Triumph der Philosophie im 18. Jahrhundert [The Triumph of Philosophy in the 18th Century] (2 vols., Germantown, 1803).


Johann Joachim Christoph Bode (Aemilius/Winefried): Initiated into Freemasonry at the Hamburg Lodge ‘Absalom’ in 1764; member of the Strict Observance (alias “a Lilio convallium”); 1782-86, 'Absalom' Master of the Chair; Illuminatus minor, 1782; Illuminatus major, 1783; Upper Saxony Provincial, 1784; 1785-93, the defacto head of the Illuminati

The most important member of the Illuminati that Knigge had personally recruited - at the famous Congress of Wilhelmsbad, in the summer of 1782 - was Johann Joachim Christoph Bode (1730-1793). With a take-no-prisoners attitude, J. J. C. Bode was one of the most respected Freemasons in all of Germany and even more of a zealous rationalist than Weishaupt himself. Bode was already completely obsessed with discovering hidden Jesuits in Masonry, and would soon warn his Superiors about the danger lurking within. "Brother Bode," writes René Le Forestier,
Eques a Lilie Convallium, Director of the 7th Province of the Strict Observance, arrived at the conviction that the Jesuits had invented Templar Freemasonry, first to support the cause of Catholic Stuarts, then, after the suppression of the Order, to maintain secrecy and combat Protestantism. He thought that Johnson, Hund, Starck, the Clerics, Gugomos, Waechter - who claim to have brought secret knowledge back to Rome - and the whole of the Swedenborgian Illuminés were either emissaries or instruments of the disciples of Loyola, and he was preparing to warn the Superiors of the Strict Observance of this intrigue.
- Le Forestier, op. cit., p. 186

And warn he did; in a long manuscript addressed to the Superiors of the Strict Observance on September 19, 1780. Le Forestier, who read the circular in full, gives three examples (p. 361n.2) of the type of arguments Bode had utilized: 1) That Hiram Abiff's murderers - two rebels - "symbolize the Roman Catholic hierarchy destroyed by Luther and Calvin"; 2) "The Sprig of Acacia, so dear to Freemasons, looks exactly like the sign of the Bishop" (huh?); and that 3) Baron von Hund (the founder of the Strict Observance) had told the tale of being received into an already extant Masonic Templarism by an Eques a Penna Rubra [Knight of the Red Feather] in the 1740s, but was sworn to conceal his true name. The third was further elaborated upon. Bode said he had come across an historical episode which backed up his "hidden Jesuits behind Templar Masonry" theory. While reading History of the Jesuits (1760), by his friend Hardenberg, he came across a story about some Jesuit prisoners captured after a battle in 1759. Apparently, one of them wore a helmet adorned with a red feather, and "a red Hussar costume with loose sleeves with a chain around his neck. Bode concludes without hesitation that the Jesuit prisoner, father Lenanez, was in fact the Eques a Penna Rubra mentioned by Hund; that what he was wearing during combat was the collar of the Strict Observance as well as the coat of a Prefect [a grade within the rite]; and that the author had mistakenly confused the outfit with the vestments of a Hussar" (ibid.) The first two points seem like gibberish, and hardly even imaginative. The third, however, must surely have piqued the curiosity of his fellow Jesuit paranoiacs. It strikes to the heart of the mystery.

The gist of the tale is this: In the 1750s Baron von Hund started advertising a new rite amongst his Masonic brethren. He claimed it descended directly from the Knights Templar. When pressed for further details, he finally revealed that while in Paris in the early 1740s, he was initiated into some higher degrees - a secret order of Templars - and dubbed a Chevalier Templier. The master initiator was an "Unknown Superior," who had only been identified to him as 'Knight of the Red Feather.' He further elaborated that, shortly after the ceremony, he was brought before none other than Charles Edward Stuart (Bonnie Prince Charlie; the Young Pretender) himself, whom he assumed was also an "Unknown Superior" of the Order. All the elements are present from the start for an imaginative anti-Catholic theorist to run amuck: (Catholic) Jacobites, (Catholic) Stuart pretenders, (Catholic) Knights Templar, (Catholic) Unknown Superiors - oh my! The one thing that nagged at everyone, however, was the identity of the master string-puller himself, this Knight of the Red Feather. Everyone had a crack at it - it was a favorite pastime - and Bode was but one in a long line of hypothesizers. While Bode was unsurprisingly looking for a Jesuit, Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, still chasing the mystery some 200 years later, believe they have cracked the case. In
Temple and the Lodge (Arcade Publishing, 1991), pp. 196-8, stemming from access "to the papers of a group

called 'Stella Templum'," the Knight of the Red Feather, they claim, was identified in the heretofore unknown archives as one Alexander Montgomery. Bode was relentless in his efforts to warn his Masonic brothers of Jesuits concealed in Masonry. When Knigge approached him at the Wilhelmsbad Congress as a potential recruit, Bode stipulated a condition that Knigge prove the Order of the Illuminati were the implacable enemies of the Jesuits; he also requested permission to print and distribute some of his materials on Jesuitry in Masonry to the brethren of the Order
(Nachtrag von weitern Originalschriften, welche die Illuminatensekte, I, pp. 218-20). But Bode had already been making his

own discreet inquiries into the Illuminati and was impressed with what he'd heard; he didn't need much convincing: the grade of Illuminatus Dirigens* was read in full, along with passages from Knigge's abovementioned 1781 pamphlet, Ueber Jesuiten, Freymaurer und deutsche Rosencreutzer (see Le Forestier, op. cit., p. 370
and n.4).
* This includes the long Rousseauian (socialist) speech by Weishaupt on original primitivist perfection; the evils of private

property and government, nationalism and patriotism; and the despotism of throne and altar.

Another example of Bode's zealous efforts to rid Masonry of Jesuitism (superstition and mysticism) was when he had sent one of his signature manifestos to the heads of the 1787 Masonic convention in Paris, convoked by the notorious 'Philalèthes.' That act, along with his trip to Paris in the summer, would ultimately win for the Illuminati some prized members of the powerful Paris Lodge ‘Les Amis Réunis,’ and a secret Illuminati cell in France - the details of which can be read in my forthcoming book.


The roll-call of "Jesuit hunters" within the Illuminati would be long indeed, if I were to list and recount the actions of them all. A good number of Viennese Illuminati, for instance, were well-known polemicists against the Sons of Loyola; and they were some of the most talented satirists and poets of the Enlightenment. But this article was not meant to be exhaustive. I merely felt that, given the rampant twisting of history by some conspiracy theorists, this story desperately needed to be told. If you're searching for secret Jesuitical influence during the 18th Century, it's not that difficult to find. My feeling is that some of the concerns about Templar-masonry do seem warranted. The sudden appearance of Templar and Scottish-Jacobite-Stuart allegiance among Masonic aristocrats during the 1740s and 50s has the smell of a phenomenon from without; and the Jesuits and the Vatican - it is pretty obvious - would have had the most to gain from the introduction of such beliefs. That the Jesuits had infiltrated the Golden and Rosy Cross, there is no doubt. The Jesuit court confessor to the Bavarian Elector Karl Theodor, the hated and detested Ignaz Franck, as mentioned above, was the head of the Munich Rosicrucian Circle. The alliance between the Rosicrucians and the Jesuits during the 18th Century is not difficult to spot once you dig a bit under the surface; and I can't help but marvel at how incredibly ironic that is. For when the original Rosicrucian manifestos appeared on the scene in 1614, a prominent theme was denunciation of the Jesuits. According to the late Frances Yates, "the illuminated wisdom of the Fama … makes strongly anti-Jesuit remarks … [and] is setting forth an alternative to the Jesuit Order." The general "intention is clear," she says, an "intention of associating the first Rosicrucian manifesto with anti-Jesuit propaganda"
(The Rosicrucian Enlightenment, Routledge Classics, 2004, p. 59).


The phenomena of the Zio-Fascism cum Bolshevik ethos and the Palestinian saga are stage center and will remain so till Armageddon, which many feel is not afar off. With this in mind, we will now explore historically validated methods that may embarrass some readers who will realize their ignorance or learn of their vicarious cooperation with the organized wickedness of the Zionist ponerocracy. Power is required to enact the outrageous schemes of coercion that control global wealth and command the utilitarian will of earth’s inhabitants. So let us look at the little known historicity of the atavistic nemesis.

It may surprise some readers that most Jews are not Zionists and many have little love for Israelis. But just as citizens rush to a flag they do not comprehend, the State of Israel draws support from Jews in general and most have no idea that Zionist leaders are either manic disciples of Illuminati Magi who purposely misguide them, or outright atheists. Judaism, in its undefiled form as practiced by devout descendants of Isaac is actually closer to Islam than the present Christian apostasy. Nevertheless, the disparity between Zionism and Judaism is publicly belied by Israel’s Supreme Court building as shown previously. Not far distant is Dorothy de Rothschild’s Grove and in its centre is the Obelisk (phallus) of Isis or Ashteroth. The prophet Jeremiah (pbuh) had much to say about Christmas and such groves in his book because, without exception, groves were traditionally set aside for the worship of the ‘Queen of Heaven’ (originally Semiramis) and Zionists certainly lust after this lady’s favor and purse, as does the Vatican.

The reader will also begin, I pray, to understand cozy relations governments have with Organized Crime, especially the Jewish mob. The CIA has facilitated and profited from illicit drug trafficking for decades after taking over trade routes established by the British and French governments in Indo-China. Opium profits vis-à-vis the British East India Co. have endowed the ‘Skull & Bones’ fraternity at Yale since 1830, as well as Dr. Coleman’s Committee of 300. And a few of the more astute WWII buffs know that the ‘Empire of the Sun’ had a major cocaine plantation on Iwo Jima run by the Yakuza.

Where do ‘Zionists’ fit in this mania? Well, just as Ezekiel dug through Temple Foundations (Ezekiel 8: 7-18) to enter cult caverns to see Kabbalists at work in Satanic cellars, so must historians seeking truth. I am greatly relieved in my efforts by those who have gone before me, some of whom are Jews whose families and blood authored the Yiddish Axiom quoted above.

Facts on the Skull & Bones Fraternity @ Yale University

Founded & endowed by General William H. Russell who was initiated into the Illuminati and Thule Cults in Germany. General Russell’s Family became wealthy via trade in Opium with the East India Company; parent Co. of the 300 Olympian families. At that time in America, Freemasons were in disgrace and disrepute over the murder of Captain William Morgan who published a volume exposing their secrets. Hence, Gen. Russell avoided the Freemasonic appellation but dressed his fraternity with their regalia and ritual. Hence, the continued pretense allows the Bush Clan to deny Masonic affiliation. Their windowless fraternity house is named ‘The Tomb’ / Their Fraternal Motto is ‘New World Order’ / Their Logo is the ‘Skull & Bones’ (Jolly Roger) of Hitler’s Thule Society / The Interior decor boasts swastikas, pirate flags, skulls, coffins, & bones.

A Few Bonesmen: Sen. John Kerry; Sen. Orrin Hatch; Sen. David Boren, CIA Director Robert Gates; William F. Buckley; Christopher Buckley; Potter Stuart, Supreme Court Justice; William H. Taft Pres.; Archibald MacLeish, founder of UNESCO; T.W. Hooper, CEO, American Publishing Association; Henry Luce, CEO, Time & Life Magazines; Sen. Howard Chafee, Henry Stimson, Hoover’s Sec of State; Robert Lovett, Truman’s Sec of Defense; Prescott Bush Sr., George Bush Sr., George W. Bush, Winston Lord, CFR Pres.
Wall Street Bonesmen: Brown Brothers & Harriman, Solomon Brothers, Lehman Brothers, Kun & Loeb, Morgan Stanley & Co all have Bondsman Alumni as Directors – Brown Brothers & Harriman & America’s Union Bank financed both the Bolshevik and Nazi Efforts. The Bush Family are major partners and/or stockholders in both firm
The Skull is a Kabbalist symbol for the Baphomet Goat of Mendez as previously discussed; and the Crossed Bones symbolize Osiris. Every Pharaoh had his leg bones crossed in the tomb as do Freemasons on ritual burial. The CFR is a major Bonesman beehive submitted to London’s Chatham House which was founded by Round Tables of the Jew, Cecil Rhodes, and both institutions are highly active in the World Council of Churches and various Knightly Orders furtively Loyal to Rome’s unholy chair. Another Bonesman alumnus, John Dewey, revolutionized American education in association with the Fabian Society of London’s School of Economic theft. He introduced social engineering and liberal values designed to erode what remained of sound Patriarchal ethics. Many famous Fabians were/are Jewish elitist, Marxists or Frankist Zionists who favor social engineering and eugenics.

The ‘Force’

Allah puts forth a parable—a man belonging to many partners at variance with each other, and a man belonging entirely to one master: are those two equal in comparison? Praise be to Allah! But most of them have no knowledge. (Al’Qur’an; XXXIX: 29)
FrankYakov ben Judah Leib Frankovich (1726-91)

Here the Koran clearly indicates that Iblis has sedulously authored numerous oddball factions. Among these was early 17th century Shabbataism under the Kabbalist Bal Shem, Zabbetai Zvi, which later became 18th century Frankism which morphed to 19th century Zionism, and then to 20th century Israelitism as a vehicle to help usher New World Orderism (Globalism). Frankists established annual orgies at the Feast of Purim, practiced wife swapping throughout the year and generally had a great time reforming the pliant morals of European nobility while infiltrating them. The original motto of the psychotic Mr. Zvi was: “Praise be He (Jehovah) Who permits the forbidden”, which made him an exemplary Apostle of Rasputin’s creed and a disciple of the Alamut cult spawned by the work of Abdul ibn Maymun who fathered the Fatimid farce.

The goal of 18th century prescient Zionists cum Baal worshipers was to overturn Hebrew morality along with goyim decency and thereby negate both Torah and Bible while elevating the atavistic promiscuity of ancient fertility magick. This was a practical stepping stone towards the Messianic Age of the libertine chaos that marked the Weimar Republic and which finally hit American streets during Prohibition and later when Beatles, Rolling Stones and sundry Madonna sex goddesses emigrated. Their Purim escapade was actually a perversion of the Hebrew Feast of Jubilees, a feast that was never celebrated because Israel, by everyone’s account, had never kept Covenant with G-d for a consecutive fifty years. This ‘Frankist Spring’ occurred during the Encyclopedist mania of Rousseau Romanticism and Voltaire Illuminism which presaged the French Revolution whose Jacobin (Catholic) ‘White Terror’ was the model for Stalin’s ‘Red Terror’ as well as for the Maos and Pol Pots of Twentieth Century Blitzkrieg-Barbarism.

The main obstacle Frankists confronted was that authentic Jews were a stubborn lot that refused to cooperate with the hedonism of these permissive choleric rabbis. Eventually, after Napoleon’s Imperial romp to retore the temporal reign of the ostensibly out-lawed Jesuits, Frankists, along with Weishaupt intellectuals and the moneyed Jews of Frankfurt, initiated programs to persuade Europa’s pseudo-Christians to make their continent as intolerable as possible for devout Jews. Unfortunately, it really is that simple, but I’ll return to this selective ethnic discomfiture later. Presently, I want to address the reality of sexual magick as it is central to the thesis of goddess worship, Christmas parties, and ancient fertility cults from whence the rubbish of these accretions was taken.

Al’Qur’an II:101 has this to say on the matter at hand:

And even now, when there has come to them [the Jews] an apostle from God [Mohammad], confirming the truth already in their possession, some of those who were granted revelation aforetime cast the divine writ behind their backs as though unaware of what it says, and follow instead that which the evil ones used to practice during Solomon’s reign ― for it was not Solomon who denied the truth, but those evil ones denied it by teaching people sorcery; and they follow that which has come down through the two angels [or kings as per Ibn Abas] in Babylon, Harut and Marut ― although these two never taught it to anyone without first declaring, “We are but a temptation to evil: do not then, deny God’s truth!” And they learn from these two how to create discord between a man and his wife; but whereas they can harm none thereby save by God’s leave, they acquire a knowledge that only harms themselves and does not benefit them ― although they know, indeed, that he who acquires this knowledge shall have no good in the life to come. For vile indeed is that art for which they have sold their own selves ― had they but known it. – (The Message of the Qur’an, Trans. By Mohd Asad)
StarThese verses teach that sexual magick and other forms of sorcery were taught to Jewish Elders in both Babylon and Jerusalem by Angels. Occult historians know that the annual Feast of Isis required orgiastic fornication and sodomy at the foot of the Asherah (De Rothschild’s Obelisk), as well as self mutilation and castration by the most ardent hierophants of Pharaoh’s priesthood at the Spring Equinox of Easter (Ishtar). This was/is also true for Adonis, Dionysius, Bacchantes, Cybele and numerous other cults. We see atavistic remnants of the same saturnalia in festivals of Mardi Gras, Halloween, Valentine’s Day, New Year parties, Christmas etc.—all of which were somewhere originally associated with fertility-cult gibberish.

Celebratory promiscuity is historically central to rituals that inspire social engineering policies, especially sodomy (homo or heterosexual); not to mention the coercive effects of human sacrifice used to terrify any populace into submission (see: Trinity). Though I’ve oversimplified the following equations with acrobatic equivalents, they are, nevertheless, an accurate representation of Cain’s Creed: the first ‘god-man’ on earth to ‘rule over sin’ in lands east of Eden, as per Moses in Genesis 4: 1–16.

Start aEaster = Ishtar = Isis = Ashtoreth = Semiramis = Lilith-Shakti-Kali as Queen of Heaven = Wife of God (Madonna) = Mother of sun-god Messiah = Tammuz = Horus = Son of Osiris = the Gnostic Christian’s elevation of Jesus to the ‘Word’ or ‘Son of God’ (Society of Jesus) = deification of man = indwelling of sun-god’s holy spirit = divine inspiration via sepheroth (Sufism cum Ishmai’ili cum Kabbalic cum Aryan Perfect Man twaddle) = radiation from the sun-god himself = goal of sun-god worship = Pharaoh’s Religion = Freemasonic Obsession vis-à-vis occult Illuminati overlords = Government via elite god-men (fascist ‘ubermenge’) = New Age of Horus = Global Cabal of Jolly Roger’s Laddies of Bohemian Grove = Monism’s Utopian New World Order of Plutocratic Kleptocrats and Megalomaniacs such as Jesuits et alia.
EkhartExamine the following text quoted from a 33’rd degree Masonic ‘son of England’ branded ‘the most evil man on earth’ 100 years ago; a contemporary and intimate of Hitler’s occult magus, Herr Deitrich Eckart (one of Hitler’s occult mentors, left), and Mdm. Blavatsky:

Although I was admitted to the 33’rd degree in 1900, not until 1912 were my suspicions confirmed. I speak of my belief that behind the frivolities and conviviality’s of our greatest institution (Freemasonry), lay in truth a secret ineffable and miraculous, potent to control the ‘Forces of Nature’ [the objective of Baal Worship], and not only to make men brethren, but make them ‘Divine’. But at the time I speak of, a man came to me, a man of those mysterious masters of esoteric Freemasonry, who are alike its eyes and its brains, and who exist in its most unknown, often, {even to its acknowledged chiefs} … This man had been watching my occult career for some years, and deemed me now worthy to partake of the Greater Mysteries.”
– Aleister Crowley, Grand Master, Ordo Templis Orientis, 1912

The extent of the unrecognized veil over Hidden Hands of Iblissian regency is readily apparent in this reprobate’s reverie. Mr. Crowley managed to get three of his wives committed to insane asylums after brief but magickally-inspired honeymoons. The respected historian, Francis King, documents evidence that the OTO was/is the corporate body “ultimately responsible for the final selection of’ all candidates to be made Freemasons in England.” OTO’s claim to this exalted auspice is: “Its Mastery of Sexual Magick, and thus all of the secrets of nature symbolized by Freemasonry” as quoted from the OTO Journal written by Theodor Reuss, British Spy and their Grand Master in 1902.

Dear reader, bearing in mind the previous chapter on Goats and Baal worship, these are facts that are also supported as cited in Al’Torat and Al’Qur’an. These men were not in the business of peddling fantasy for comic books but of capturing jinn and the imaginations of people like lord Northampton and other major Luciferian cronies in positions of power and influence as traditional targets for the masterful Jesuit subversion, recently endorsed by even Judge Napolitano. I submit therefore, in light of previous essays and mountains of scholarly evidence, that “Sexual Magick” is ‘the most cherished way’ of Pharaoh’s religion as cited in Al’Qur’an ( S. 20:56-73).

It is symbolized by the ‘Cross’, the Labrum of Constantine, and the phallic Egyptian ‘Ankh’ held by every Queen as depicted on the tombs of Egypt. Several hieroglyphs even have Pharaoh consuming his own semen to capture it’s life ‘force’, and Alexandrian Christian Gnostics are known to have celebrated this as the ‘body and blood’ of Jesus as the real communion rite, only hinted at in New Testament interpolations. Even the Swastika or saintly ‘Halo’ represents the carnal intercourse or ‘fire wheel’ of divine conjugation with mother earth, a combination that endows whoever controls the union with power (horns) over the ‘Forces of Nature’ as cited by revered Masonic authors and numerous texts on magick. The Nazis owed their ascendency to this magick and the inner rings of this buggered oligarchy hosted scads of Satanists.

The real power of sexual union has to do with the unity, fidelity and purity that ushers divine guidance during the pillow talk following the fanna of sexual ecstasy. The perversions cited above, however, clearly demonstrate that Pharaoh’s fascist deviancy is neither dead nor merely some marginalized neo-nuanced nuisance reserved for skinhead skirtoids. Examine NATO’s logo in Brussels and you will see the swastika cleverly disguised. Even brother Osama owed his fame to partnerships directly related to this icon, as the influence of its occult regency among neo-cons and Jesuits gave rise to Al Qaeda’s predecessors and current suppliers of jihadist fodder: the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafis, discussed in later chapters.

Hollywood and Bollywood celebrations of the libertine ‘magi morality’ that marked the Roman Empire’s dualism is exhibited by the abundance of wild sirens, sodomites and profligates. Even ancient Shakti’s Matriarchal Dravidian culture was an elective polyandrous structure that lends credence to theories regarding their migration to Easter Island. The unrestrained prurience exhibited by today’s ‘slut walkers’, ‘twerkers’, Hollywood Madams and ‘hip hop hoes’ along with ever so sensitive ‘boy-men’ and titillating sodomites only serves to erode society’s most fundamental unit, the heterosexual patriarchal family. The subversion is unmistakably recorded in the Protocols of Zion (authored by Jesuits, not Jews) and is specifically under Jewish auspice, Zionist and not. All statistics indicate a steady global decline in traditional heterosexual households wherever this sub-culture encroaches, but most especially in the USA which was targeted for pan-socialism by Papists who declared war on America over a century ago. Observe this indictment’s veracity by reading the following two citations very carefully and review the book, Lucifer’s Lodge by William H. Kennedy which describes Sexual Perversion, Luciferianism, and Satanic Ritual within the Catholic Hierarchy, as well as “Demonology At The Heart of Sexual Perversion Among Vatican Priests,” by Greg Szymanski, JD Jan 4, 2009 (

Ten years after the creation of the Knights of Columbus in 1882 AD, Pope Leo XIII declared the following in an Encyclical. Students of history will note the half-truths plainly stated to misguide the less well read:

The American Republic under Protestant rulers is with the worst enemies of the Church, where security is offered; this Republic having seized upon the lands discovered by Christopher Columbus, a Catholic, and usurped the authority and jurisdiction of the supreme head of the church, the United States is filled with obstinate heretics… The United States has been filled with books containing the most flagrant heresies of which the Protestant version of the Bible is chief. And not content with adopting its false and impious doctrines, proselyting has been resorted to, to turn the Catholics from the one true Church. The whole Roman Catholic hierarchy and priesthood of the world have been deprived of their livings by the Protestant heretics of America … Naturalization oaths have been demanded in order that the subjects of the True Church might be made to subscribe to the United States Constitution, with its impious laws and nefarious teachings to compel them to renounce the true authority of the Catholic pontiff; to dis-acknowledge Him to be the head of both church and state… With deep sorrow we are now constrained to have recourse to the arm of justice, and are obliged to take action against a nation that has rejected the Pope as head of all church and state governments…
Moreover, we proclaim the people of the United States of America to have forfeited all right to rule said Republic, and also all dominion, dignity and privileges appertaining to it. We likewise declare that all subjects of every rank and condition in the United States and every individual who has taken any oath of loyalty to the United States in any way whatever, may be absolved from said oath, as also from all duty, fidelity, or obedience on or about the 5th of September, 1893, when this Catholic Congress shall convene at Chicago, Illinois, as we shall exonerate them from all engagements, and on or about the feast of Ignatius Loyola in the year of our Lord, 1893, it will be the duty of the faithful to exterminate all heretics found within the jurisdiction of the United States of America. As the circulation of this bull, by sending to all places, would become a matter of difficulty, it is commanded that copies of it be taken and signed by Jesuit notaries, subscribed by a bishop, and sealed with the seal of our court, they will then have the same power and efficacy as these presents here.’ – Pope LEO XIII, Rome, 25 Dec 1891
Under fascism, property owners may keep their property titles and deeds, but the use of their property is, as Leo XIII wrote, “common”. Fascism is a form of socialism that retains the forms and trappings of capitalism but not its substance. Under fascism, property titles and deeds are intact but the institution of private property has disappeared. Government regulations and mandates have replaced it. For this distinction between legal ownership and actual use, the fascists owe a debt to the Roman Church-State . . . Pious XI also told us that the encyclical, Rerum Navarum was instumental in ending laissez-faire capitalism in the 20th century by ushring in the era of “effective interference by government.”
Pope Pious XI, Encyclical Quadragesimo Anno (1931), 47.

Now the reader may understand who is effectively responsible for the fall of America and globe into the Hand of Iblis. ‘Any and all means’, a Jesuit dictum, are used for the purpose of achieving Rome’s dominion over the entire earth, and that includes perversions of religions and morality, and they are happily ready to lay blame elsewhere, most especially on Jews, their traditional scapegoats, enforcers, and tax collectors.

St. Paul clearly warned that men would worship the ‘god of forces’ in order to entice believers with great signs and wonders (magick). As Crowley related, this ‘Force’ is real and extremely potent as all Shamans, Witchdoctors and Sorcerers know from primary experience. It is with the Masters and Pawns of Pharaoh’s many faceted postmodern court, and with the chosen few of Crowley’s god-men crew.

– May ‘The Force’ not be with you! –


We must allow all federations to continue as they are … we must create a super-rite to remain unknown in strictest secrecy, through which we will govern all Freemasons, which will become its international centre; more powerful because its direction will remain unknown.” – A. Pike 1870
Frank, Jacob: Frank kept Shabbateanism alive and ended its tribalism, opening adherents to the world outside of Judaism [for purposes of infiltration and subversion]. Shabbateanism become Frankism was one of the most important of the 18th century movements which freed man. The great revolutions: the Turkish, the French, the American, all sprang from his loins.
– Prof. Harris Lenowitz, a trouble making professor
of Languages and Literature at the University of Utah.



“Zionism has no place for God as such. For Zionists, Judaism is a convenient source of energy and culture and the Bible no more than a State book. From the start, most religious Jews regarded Zionism with suspicion or outright hostility and some believed it was the work of Satan,”
A History of the Jews, Paul Johnson, NY, Harper and Row, 1987, p. 547.
The British occultist, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, close advisor to Kaiser Wilhelm and adopted father of Hitler’s hero, Wagner, claimed that Isa was an Aryan. But Pilate’s spies describe Isa as a black man with blonde hair: NB: some claim this Vatican held treatise is anti-Catholic propaganda. See The Archko Volume, McIntosh & Twyman, 1887 – Keats Pub., 1975 Catalogue # 74-33199;
Yakuza_Japanese organized crime syndicate, similar to the Chinese Triads.
See: Proceedings US Anti-Masonic Convention 1830, Acacia Press, Inc. 1996, an excerpt is included in the Appendices.
See Dr. Antony Sutton’s Work: How the Order Creates Revolution
Baphomet: a hideous hermaphroditic deity representing the power of God (Prime Cause or Force) as invested in Lucifer (Satan/Iblis).
NB: John O’Hare, Pres. of The CFR, is also the Jesuit President of Fordham University
It’s been brought to my attention recently by a local Muslim Religious instructor (2004-5), that some of the Christianized natives in Borneo (Sarawak) have begun the same practice.
Jubilee was supposed to be held every 50 years. All debts forgiven, slaves set free, alienated and/or leased land returned to original owners, etc, etc… You can understand why it was never celebrated.
Voltaire was an intimate of both Weishaupt and Frederick the Great. Yes, he was an Illuminati cult member. See Hands of Ibliss for details. Rousseau was one of their pawns.
Many Mesopotamian reliefs picture kings as angels with four wings.
Skirtoids are vital, egotistical, and thick-skinned individuals who make good soldiers because of their endurance and psychological resistance. In peacetime, however, they are incapable of understanding life’s subtler matters or rearing the younger generation prudently. They are happy in primitive surroundings; a comfortable environment easily causes hysterization for them. They prove rigidly conservative in all areas and supportive of governments that rule with a heavy hand. – Political Ponerology: A Science on The Nature of Evil adjusted for Political Purposes by Andrew M. Lobaczewski.
Polyandry is now being forced upon middle Asian women due to a dearth of females because of female infanticide, especially in rural Pakistan, India, and China.
See: PORNOGRAPHY AS A SECRET WEAPON, by Lasha Darkmoon | Darkmoon.
An excellent scholarly dissertation on the subject of this power is Unholy Spirits by Gary North (Dominion Press, 1986).
Mr. Pike directed the Confederate Secret Service during America’s Civil War and continued its Ku-Klux-Klan counterpart after the war.

The Great Heroin Coup by Henrick Kruger, German Investigative Correspondent for Der Speigel, Forward by Peter Dale Scott, 1980 … the book is out of print and was suppressed for obvious reasons, but I managed to borrow a copy from an ex-undercover agent hiding in Malaysia. Mr. Kruger met an untimely end after publication and the book was pulled from the market.
Chinese Organized Crime by Mark Craig, retied Australian Chief Detective, Pub.1996, by the Winston Churchill Memorial Fund – Aussie authorities persecuted him and tried to ban the book in order to protect trade & tourism.
Cocaine, An Unauthorized Biography, by Dominic Streatfield, London Based correspondent whose publisher financed the two year research that took Mr. Streatfield to four continents and upwards of 10 countries meeting with dealers, police, DEA agents, Drug Barons in Europe, USA, Caribbean Islands, Cali, Mexico, farmers, politicos and hit men – ISBN 1-85227 921 4TBS Distributions, London, 2001 – This book was so revealing it was not released to the general public because of its damning contents. Only security personnel and select police departments had access to its unedited pre-publication issue for review. I gained access solely by serendipity! For further information contact Eleanor Johnsey @
International Drug Trafficking, Dennis Rowe Ed. Univ. Chicago Office of International Criminal Justice, National Institute of Justice, Wash. D.C., 1988
“Perhaps the most blatant example of the exploitation of drug trafficking by a state for its own purposes is that of the British East India Co., which used opium to expand British influence and control over the Celestial Empire of China. The British traffic was a planned and conscious effort to destabilize China for the purposes of commercial and colonial expansion and profit. Indeed, the resistance of the Chinese to this activity resulted in the Opium Wars (1840-42 and 1856-60) and the commercial conquest of China by European Powers. American firms, such as Perkins and Co., and Russel and Co. joined the trade.” Russell founded the ‘Skull and Bones’ Fraternity at Yale, and these opium’s profits endow it to this day. Other American Families who gained their ‘old money’ from opium, include Forbes, Delanos, and Woods.” – Peter A. Lupsha, “Transnational Narco-corruption and Narco Investment: A Focus on Mexico”, Transnational Organized Crime, Vol. 1, No. 1, Spring 1995 ibid, page 18, and The Opium War, by Peter Fay, Univ. N. Carolina Press, 1975
Mani, for whom Manichaeism is named, was a third century Prince of Babylon, the ‘Son of the Widow’ (an occult catch-phrase and password). At this time, Babylon contained the largest concentration of Jewish scholars in the world. Mani devised his own form of Gnosticism blending pagan sex rituals and Goddess worship with elements of Paulian Christianity. He “rejected Jehovah God as an evil demon.” Manichaeism imposed on Gnosticism a caste system of leaders (elect) and followers (hearers). A Manichaean sect called the Bogomils (later called Cathars) arose in Bulgaria and spread across Europe. Their ritual homosexuality became so closely associated with these Bulgarian heretics that the common practice of sodomy became known as “buggery.” Indeed, “the word for Cathar in most European languages came to be the word for homosexual: in German, Ketzer, in Italian, Gazarro, and in French, Herite… Heresy and homosexuality became so interchangeable that those accused of heresy attempted to prove their innocence by claiming heterosexuality” – Arthur Evans, Witchcraft and the Gay Counterculture
“Ritual homosexuality has been reported by anthropologists in scattered areas around the world revealing a pervasive link between ritual homosexuality and the warrior ethos… We find these similar forms of warrior homosexuality in such diverse places as New Guinea, the Amazon, Ancient Greece, and historical Japan. The process of a boy’s homosexual initiation in these societies is horrific: he is deprived of sleep, starved, beaten and raped over several days until he is completely “resocialized” as a homosexual.” – The Sambia, by anthropologist, Gilbert Herdt.
These latter techniques are utilized today by CIA operatives to create psychotic (schizophrenic) slaves and suicidal assassins. Deitrich Eckart was involved in Tantric occult sex rituals similar to Crowley and initiated Hitler into such activities (Raschke). We also know that Eckart was one of the most enthusiastic followers of Otto Weininger, a leading homosexual supremacist.
Plutarch described Lupercalia: “Lupercalia, of which many write that it was anciently celebrated by shepherds, and has also some connection with the Arcadian Lycaea. At this time many of the noble youths and of the magistrates run up and down through the city naked, for sport and laughter striking those they meet with shaggy thongs. And many women of rank also purposely get in their way, and like children at school present their hands to be struck, believing that the pregnant will thus be helped in delivery, and the barren to pregnancy… It had been literally degraded since the first century, when in 44 BC the consul Mark Antony did not scruple to run with the Luperci… In Ancient Rome, Lupercalia, observed February 13 through 15, was an archaic rite connected to fertility. Lupercalia was a festival local to the city of Rome. The more general Festival of Juno Februa, meaning “Juno the purifier “or “the chaste Juno,” was celebrated on February 13-14. Pope Gelasius I (492-496) abolished Lupercalia. It is a common opinion that the Christian church may have decided to celebrate Valentine’s feast day in the middle of February in an effort to Christianize celebrations of the pagan Lupercalia. The Roman Catholic Church could not abolish the deeply rooted Lupercalia festival, so the church set aside a day to honor the Virgin Mary.
Francis King: “The Secret Rituals of the O.T.O.“, London 1973, and also Magic World; Ritual Magic in England, Pub. Neville Spearman 1970; and Satan and the Swastika, Mayflower 1976. OTO: Founded in Germany. Crowley took the name ‘Baphomet’ on Initiation. Bush Senior took the name ‘Magog’.
Hugh Urban, Unleashing the Beast: Aleister Crowley, 2007; Also: The Beast with Two Backs: Kabalah and Tantra in Late Victorian Sexual Magic, 2003-4 Ohio State University Office of International Affairs, Ohio State University.


Marranos Everywhere! Christian Kabbalists and the Conquest of the New World
Mar 2018
Posted by zaidpub in Catholicism, Jews, Topical Historical Reminder≈ Leave a comment
TagsAlbigensians, Amsterdam, Asiatic Brethren, Borgias, Cathars, Christopher Columbus, Conquistadors, Conversos, Crypto-Judaism, Discalced Carmelites, Dominicans, Elizabeth I, Franciscans, Freemasonsy, Ismailis, Jesuits, John Dee, Kabbalists, Mandaeans, Marranos, Menasseh Ben Israel, Oliver Cromwell, Pilgrims, Puritanism, Reformation, Rosicrucians, Sabbatai Zevi, Sabbateans, Saint John of the Cross, Saint Teresa of Avila, Spanish Inquisition, templars, The Mayflower, The New Atlantis
3 Votes

by David Livingston : (7 March 2018)
Also See: marranos masquerading as christians
The Spanish Inquisition and the Expulsion from Spain in 1492, were some of the most pivotal events in modern times. Jewish converts penetrated to Christianity, where they could exact their revenge. Jewish Kabbalists became Christian Kabbalists. When they entered Italy, they fostered the Renaissance, and in Amsterdam, the Northern Renaissance. Luther established Protestantism, creating a schism that permanently removed large sections of Christian Europe from Catholic Control. Rosicrucians cultivated the career of the foremost false prophet and Jewish apostate: Sabbatai Zevi. Leaving from the Netherlands, these secret Rosicrucians, known to American history as the “Pilgrims”, set sail for the New World via England, where they hoped to found a nxew Masonic experiment, known as The New Atlantis.

In 1290, King Edward issued a decree to have all Jews expelled from England. All the crowned heads of Europe then followed his example. France expelled the Jews in 1306. In 1348 Saxony followed suit. In 1360 Hungary, in 1370 Belgium, in 1380 Slovakia, in 1420 Austria, in 1444 the Netherlands. As in other parts of Europe, violent persecution had been growing in Spain and Portugal, where in 1391, hundreds of thousands of Jews had been forced to convert to Catholicism. Publicly, the Jewish converts known as Marranos, and also as Conversos, were Christians but secretly they continued to practice Judaism.

While secret conversion of Jews to another religion during the Spanish inquisition is the most known example, as Rabbi Joachim Prinz explained in The Secret Jews, “Jewish existence in disguise predates the Inquisition by more than a thousand years.”[1] There were also the examples of the first Gnostic sects, which comprised of Merkabah mystics who entered Christianity. Likewise, in the seventh century, the Quran advised the early Muslim community, “And a faction of the People of the Scripture say [to each other], “Believe in that which was revealed to the believers at the beginning of the day and reject it at its end that perhaps they will abandon their religion.”[2]

As demonstrated by Louis I. Newman in Jewish Influences on Christian Reform Movements, a similar tendency can be attributed to the advent of Catharism and eventually to Protestantism and other Christian heresies. The Cathars, also known as the Albigensians, were a Gnostic sect of the thirteenth century who worshipped Lucifer. Their influence extended to the legends of the Holy Grail, by way of the Templars, and thereby to Rosicrucianism and Freemasonsy. In his denunciation the heresy, Adversus Albigenses, Lucas of Tuy, a Spanish monk, noted:

The secular heads and judges of the cities hear the doctrines of heresy from Jews whom they number among their familiars and friends… They teach other Jews to propose their blasphemies against Christians, in order that they can thus pervert the Catholic faith. All the synagogues of the malignant Jews have patrons, and they placate the leaders with innumerable gifts, and seduce by gold the judges to their own culture…”[3]

Marranos joined orders like the Franciscans, Dominicans and Discalced Carmelites, where their prophetic eschatology was often branded as heresy.[4] The Discalced Carmelites were established in 1593 by two Spanish saints, Saint Teresa of Avila and Saint John of the Cross. John of the Cross was born Juan de Yepes y Alvarez, into a Marrano family.[5] John’s mystical theology is influenced by the Neoplatonic tradition of pseudo-Dionysus, a Christian theologian and philosopher of the late fifth to early sixth century.[6] The author pseudonymously identifies himself as the figure of Dionysius the Areopagite, the Athenian convert of the apostle Paul. The Dionysian mystical teachings were universally accepted throughout the East, amongst both Chalcedonians and non-Chalcedonians, and also had a strong impact in later medieval western mysticism, most notably Meister Eckhart.

Based upon preliminary reports made by members of the Discalced Carmelite mission in Basra during the sixteenth century, the Mandaeans of Iraq are called “Christians of Saint John.”[7] Often identified with the Sabians, the source of the occult teachings of the Ismailis, which were reportedly transmitted to the Templars. For this reason, the Mandeans were the “Eastern Mystics” of Rosicrucian legend, who later became the basis of the Sabbatean sect of the Asiatic Brethren.

Teresa of Avila’s paternal grandfather, Juan Sánchez de Toledo, was a Marrano.[8] During a bout of severe illness, Teresa experienced periods of religious ecstasy. Around 1556, when various friends suggested these were diabolical, her confessor, the Jesuit Saint Francis Borgia, reassured her of their divine inspiration. The House of Borgia, an Italo-Spanish noble family, which rose to prominence during the Italian Renaissance, was widely rumored to be of Marrano origin.[9] The Borgias became prominent in ecclesiastical and political affairs in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, producing two popes: Pope Callixtus III during 1455–1458, and Pope Alexander VI, during 1492–1503. Especially during the reign of Alexander VI, they were suspected of many crimes, including adultery, incest, simony, theft, bribery, and murder, especially by arsenic poisoning.[10]

Marranos were also involved in the creation of the order of the Jesuits. Ignatius of Loyola, who founded the Jesuits in 1534, had been a member of a heretical sect known as the Alumbrados, meaning “Illuminated,” which was composed mainly of Conversos.[11] Although there is no direct evidence that Loyola himself was a Marrano, according to “Lo Judeo Conversos en Espna Y America” (Jewish Conversos in Spain and America), Loyola is a typical Converso name.[12] As revealed by Robert Maryks, in The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews, Loyola’s successor Diego Laynez was a Marrano, as were many Jesuit leaders who came after him.[13] In fact, Marranos increased in numbers within Christian orders to the point where the papacy imposed “purity of blood” laws, placing restrictions on the entrance of New Christians to institutions like the Jesuits.

Christopher Columbus
According to historian Cecil Roth’s History of the Marranos, “The connection between the Jews and the discovery of America was not, however, merely a question of fortuitous coincidence. The epoch-making expedition of 1492 was as a matter of fact very largely a Jewish, or rather a Marrano, enterprise.”[14] The Alhambra Decree, also known as the Edict of Expulsion, was an edict issued on 31 March 1492, by the joint Catholic Monarchs of Spain, Isabella I of Castile and Ferdinand II of Aragon, ordering the expulsion of Jews from the Kingdoms of Castile and Aragon and its territories and possessions by July 31. Four days later, on the evening of August 3, 1492, Columbus departed from Spain with three ships: the Santa María, the Pinta and the Niña, an adventure that culminated in the European discovery of the New World. The coincidence of these dates has long suggested that Columbus may have headed a mission intended to find a new haven for the persecuted Jews.

Estelle Irizarry, a linguistics professor at Georgetown University, argues that Columbus was a Catalan who tried to conceal a Jewish heritage. Irizarry notes that Columbus always wrote in Spanish, occasionally included Hebrew in his writing, and referenced the Jewish High Holidays in his journal during the first voyage. Recently, a number of Spanish scholars, such as Jose Erugo, Celso Garcia de la Riega, Otero Sanchez and Nicholas Dias Perez, have concluded that Columbus was a Marrano.[15] Columbus didn’t speak Italian, signed his last will and testament on May 19, 1506, whose wishes conformed to Jewish customs. He also decreed to give money to a Jew who lived in the Lisbon Jewish Quarter. Columbus used a triangular signature of dots and letters that resembled inscriptions found on gravestones of Jewish cemeteries in Spain. According to British historian Cecil Roth’s The History of the Marranos, the anagram was a cryptic substitute for the Kaddish, a prayer recited in the synagogue by mourners after the death of a close relative.

Lastly, Columbus left money to support a crusade he hoped his successors would undertake up to liberate the Holy Land. Simon Wiesenthal in Sails of Hope argues that, in light of the Jews’ expulsion from Spain, Columbus’ voyage was motivated by a desire to find a safe haven. Carol Delaney, a cultural anthropologist at Stanford University, concludes that Columbus was a deeply religious man whose purpose was to sail to Asia to obtain gold in order to finance a crusade to take back Jerusalem and rebuild the Temple of Jerusalem.[16]

Columbus was the son-in-law of a Knight of Christ. After the Templars were abolished on in 1312 by the papal bull, issued by Pope Clement V, the former Knights Templar order as it was reconstituted in Portugal as the Military Order of Christ. The Order was founded in 1319, with the protection of the Portuguese king, Denis I, who refused to pursue and persecute the former knights as had occurred in all the other sovereign states under the political influence of the Catholic Church. The order was devoted specifically to sailing, and sponsored a number of history’s most well-known explorers. Vasco de Gama was a member of the order, and Prince Henry the Navigator, speculated as having been among the few to explore the New World prior to Christopher Columbus, was a Grand Master. Columbus may have used his relative’s maps to navigate his way to America, where his ships sailed under flags bearing the order’s insignia, the red cross of the Templars.

Contrary to common assumptions, Columbus’ voyage to the New World was not funded by Queen Isabella, but rather by two Jewish Conversos, Louis de Santangel and Gabriel Sanchez, and another prominent a Portuguese Jewish statesman and Kabbalist philosopher, Don Isaac Abrabanel.[17] Abarbanel’s philosophy dealt with the sciences and how the general field relates to the Jewish religion and traditions, and his apologetics defends the Jewish idea of the coming of the Messiah. It is often implied that Abarbanel’s exegesis was written with the purpose of giving hope to the Jews of Spain that the arrival of the Messiah was imminent in their days.

Pere Bonnin, after studying a list of 3,500 names resulting from a census of Jewish communities of Spain by the Catholic Church and as found in Inquisition records, cited the Jewish origin of historically prominent figures Christopher Columbus, Hernan Cortes, Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra and many others.[18] The two most famous conquistadors were Cortes who conquered the Aztec Empire, and Francisco Pizarro who led the conquest of the Incan Empire. They were second cousins born in Extremadura, where many of the Spanish conquerors were born. When Cortes first conquered Mexico for Spain in 1521, he did so with a number of secret Jews amongst his men. Catholic religious orders that participated and supported the exploration, evangelizing and pacifying, were mostly Dominicans, Carmelites, Franciscans and Jesuits.

After the expulsion, many Sephardic Jews migrated to the Netherlands, France and eventually Italy, from where they joined other expeditions to the Americas. By the late sixteenth century, organized Jewish communities were founded in the Portuguese colony of Brazil, the Dutch Suriname and Curaçao, Spanish Santo Domingo, and the English colonies of Jamaica and Barbados. In addition, there were unorganized communities of Jews in Spanish and Portuguese territories where the Inquisition was active, including Colombia, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Mexico and Peru.

The Jews were far more significant in the earliest exploration, settlement and development of the Caribbean and South America than has previously been acknowledged. Several Jewish communities in the Caribbean, Central and South America flourished, particularly in those areas under Dutch and English control, which were more tolerant. Jewish ships plying the Atlantic carried such names as the Mazel Tov or Bekeerde Jood (converted Jew), according to Dr. Wim Klooster, a Dutch historian.[19] Ed Kritzler’s best-seller Jewish Pirates of the Caribbean, recounts the tales of Jewish pioneers like the pirate Moses Cohen Henriques, who was the scourge of the Spanish treasure fleet, and his brother Abraham.

By the mid-seventeenth century, the largest Jewish communities in the Western Hemisphere were located in Suriname and Brazil. By the early eighteenth century, half the European population of Suriname, then a territory of the Netherlands, was Jewish.[20] Dr. Anita Novinsky, a professor of history at the University of San Paulo, estimated that in the region around Rio de Janeiro and the state of Bahia, Marranos constituted 20 percent of the European population by the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. That number rose to 50 percent in the Paraiba region near Recife, the heart of the lucrative sugar trade.[21]

Archaeologist Hugo Ludeña raised the possibility that the conquistador Francisco Pizarro was actually of Marrano origin, from a peculiar Hebrew symbol found in the ossuary of Pizarro. For almost a century, the mummified remains of Pizarro were on display in a glass casket in the Cathedral of Lima, Peru. However, in the 1970s, an ossuary was found which the scientific community determined to contain the bones of Pizarro. Ludeña determined that the engraved on the lid of the ossuary, which featured three crossed ellipses locked in a circle, was a Jewish symbol, following the funeral rites of the family.[22]

Protestant Reformation
At first, Martin Luther’s challenge to Roman Catholicism was welcomed by Jews who had been victimized by the Inquisition, and who hoped that breaking the power of the Church would lead to greater tolerance of other forms of worship. There were even some, like Abraham Farissol, who regarded Luther as a Crypto-Jew, a reformer bent on upholding religious truth and justice, and whose iconoclastic reforms were directed toward a return to Judaism.[23] Some scholars, particularly of the Sephardi diaspora, such as Joseph ha-Kohen (1496-c. 1575), were strongly pro-Reformation.[24]

Luther himself, related Louis I. Newman, was interested for a time in the Kabbalah, perhaps under the influence of works of Johann Reuchlin, the great-uncle of Luther’s collaborator and primary founder of Lutheranism after Luther himself, Philipp Melanchthon. Melanchthon wrote in 1520, “I would rather die than be separated from Luther,” whom he afterward compared to Elijah, and called “the man full of the Holy Ghost.” Melanchthon exclaimed at Luther’s death, “Dead is the horseman and chariot of Israel who ruled the church in this last age of the world!”[25]

Melanchthon was like a son to Reuchlin until the Reformation estranged them. In 1490 he was again in Italy. During his second visit to Rome in 1490, Reuchlin became acquainted with Pico di Mirandola at Florence, and, learning from him about the Kabbalah, he became interested in Hebrew.[26] Following Pico, he believed to have found in the Kabbalah a theosophy which might be employed in the defense of Christianity and the reconciliation of science with the mysteries of faith. Reuchlin’s Kabbalistic ideas were expounded in the De Verbo Mirifico, and finally in the De Arte Cabbalistica, in which he shared with Pope Leo X, the Medici pope who had been tutored by Pico, how he had met with Pico and his circle of philosophers who were reviving the ancient wisdom.

Heinrich Graetz and Francis Yates contended that this affair helped spark the Protestant Reformation.[27] Luther himself supported Reuchlin in a controversy known as “The Battle of the Books,” which became a debate which involved the leading thinkers and rulers of Europe. Many of Reuchlin’s contemporaries thought that the first step to the conversion of the Jews was to take away their books. This view was advocated by Johannes Pfefferkorn, a Jewish convert to Catholicism and a follower of the Dominicans, who preached against the Jews and attempted to destroy copies of the Talmud, and engaged in a pamphleteering battle with Reuchlin.

The Pfefferkorn controversy caused a wide rift in the church and eventually the case came before the papal court in Rome. When, in 1517, Reuchlin received the theses propounded by Luther, he exclaimed, “Thanks be to God, at last they have found a man who will give them so much to do that they will be compelled to let my old age end in peace.”[28] “It was thus a Jewish issue,” explains Louis I. Newman, “which helped ignite the fires of the Reformation; a conflict over a Jewish question created the milieu in which Luther’s movement emerged and developed, just as the Judaizing heresies of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries were in part stimulated by the debate over the Talmud.”[29]

The several Jewish converts to Lutheranism whom Luther knew influenced him in many directions. These included Matthew Adrian, a Spanish Jew, the teacher of Conrad Pellican, the grammarian, of Fabritius Capito, a friend of Erasmus. Luther sought the advice of Jewish students and Rabbis on numerous occasions. Jews paid visits at his home to discuss with him difficult passages of the Bible, especially for the revision of his translation. On one occasion, three Jews, Shmaryah, Shlomoh and Leo visited him in Wittenberg, and expressed their joy that Christians were now busying themselves with Jewish literature and mentioned the hope among many Jews that the Christians would enter Judaism en masse as a result of the Reformation.

The role of Jewish converts in the spread of the doctrines behind the Reformation has been pointed out on several occasions. During the Middle Ages, Jewish converts who attacked their former faith included Nicholas Donin, Paul Christian, Abner-Alphonso of Burgos (c. 1270 – c. 1347), John of Valladolid (b. 1335), Paul of Burgos (c. 1351 – 1435) and Geronimo de Santa Fe (fl. 1400–1430). Impelled by his hatred of Talmudic Judaism, Paul of Burgos, an erudite scholar of Talmudic and rabbinical literature, composed the Dialogus Pauli et Sauli Contra Judæos, sive Scrutinium Scripturarum, which as a source for Luther’s On the Jews and their Lies. Victor von Carben, was involved in the Pfefferkorn controversy, Emmanuel Tremellius, who published a Latin version of the Hebrew Bible, Jochanan Isaac, the author of two Hebrew grammars, and his son Stephen, all became Protestants and wrote polemics against Catholicism.

About 1524, Jews coming from Europe described with joy to the Kabbalist Abraham ben Eliezer ha-Levi in Jerusalem the anti-clerical tendencies of the Protestant reformers. On the basis of this report, the Kabbalists regarded Luther as a kind of crypto-Jew who would educate Christians away from the bad elements of their faith.[30] Abraham ben Eliezer related that a great astrologer in Spain, named R. Joseph, wrote in a forecast on the significance of the sun’s eclipse in the year 1478, as prophesying a man who would reform religion and rebuild Jerusalem. Abraham b. Eliezer adds that “at first glance we believed that the man foreshadowed by the stars was Messiah b. Joseph [Messiah]. But now it is evident that he is none other than the man mentioned [by all; i.e., Luther], who is exceedingly noble in all his undertakings and all these forecasts are realized in his person.”[31]

Occult Court of Elizabeth I
In England, the most significant consequence of the Protestant Reformation had been the establishment of the independent church by King Henry the VIII, followed in due course by the establishment of the Church of England under Queen Elizabeth I. There is little evidence for the existence of Marranos in England during the reign of Elizabeth I. However, as elsewhere, their surreptitious presence felt through the influence of the Christian Kabbalah.

Queen Elizabeth I’s court was steeped in esoteric thought. Edmund Spenser’s magical poem The Faerie Queene and his Neoplatonic hymns in Elizabeth’s honor, published in the 1590’s, were a direct challenge to the Counter-Reformation and their attitude to heretical nature of Renaissance philosophy. The poem, inspired by the Order of the Garter, follows several knights, like the Redcrosse Knight, the hero of Book One who bears the emblem of Saint George. Additionally, Christopher Marlowe wrote Doctor Faustus, a play developed from the Faust legend, in which a sorcerer sells his soul to the devil for power and knowledge.

Like Spenser’s Faerie Queene, the British accepted the prophecy of Merlin, which proclaimed that the Saxons would rule over the Britons until King Arthur again restored them to their rightful place as rulers. The prophecy was related by Geoffrey of Monmouth (1100 – 1155), a cleric and one of the major figures in the development of British historiography and the popularity of tales of King Arthur. He is best known for his chronicle Historia Regum Britanniae, which relates the purported history of Britain from its first settlement by Brutus, a descendant of the Trojan hero Aeneas. The prophecy was adopted by the British people and eventually used by the Tudors who claimed to be descendants of Arthur and rightful rulers of Britain.[32]

North America attracted particular attention in England, as the idea grew that a north-west passage to the East could be discovered. John Bale, writing in the 1540s, had identified the Protestant Church of England as an actor in the historical struggle with the “false church” of Catholicism, supported by his interpretations of the Book of Revelation. The views of John Foxe, author of what is popularly known as Foxe’s Book of Martyrs, became widely accepted within the Church of England for a generation and more. According to Foxe, a war against the Antichrist was being waged by the English people, but led by the Christian Emperor (echoing Constantine I) who was identified with Elizabeth I. Foxe, referring to it as “this my-country church of England,” characterized England’s destiny as the elect nation” of God.[33]

The imperial ambitions of Elizabeth’s reign were also coupled with the esotericism represented by John Dee and others. John Dee (1527 – 1608 or 1609) was royal astrologer to Queen Elizabeth I, who believed that he found the secret of conjuring angels by numerical configurations in the tradition of the Kabbalah. It is John Dee who has been credited with the coining of the term “British Empire.” Believing himself to be of ancient British royal descent as well, Dee identified completely with the British imperial myth around Elizabeth I.[34] According to Donald Tyson, “It was Dee’s plan to use the complex system of magic communicated by the angels to advance the expansionist policies of his sovereign, Elizabeth the First.”[35] In his 1576 General and rare memorials pertayning to the Perfect Arte of Navigation, Dee advocated a policy of political and economic strengthening of England and imperial expansion through colonization and maritime supremacy into the New World.

Dee laid the foundations for British imperialism by claiming that conquests by King Arthur had given Elizabeth I title to foreign lands such as Greenland, Iceland, Friesland, the northern islands towards Russia and the North Pole. Dee claimed that the New World was appointed by Providence for the British to influence and rule. He further asserted that Brutus of Britain and King Arthur as well as Madog had conquered lands in the Americas and therefore their heir Elizabeth I of England had a priority claim there.[36]

One of Dee’s staunchest supporters at court was Sir Christopher Hatton who was the main backer for Sir Francis Drake’s world voyage. Drake’s exploits were legendary, making him a hero to the English, but a pirate to the Spaniards to whom he was known as El Draco, “the Dragon.” Drake also carried out the second circumnavigation of the world, from 1577 to 1580. Drake was Vice-Admiral of the English fleet in 1588 against the Spanish Armada, whose defeat was supposedly caused through Dee’s sorcery. When Elizabeth had consulted Dee on how to best counter the advancing Spanish ships, he advised her and Drake to refrain from pursuit because the Spanish fleet would be broken up by storm. When a storm did destroy the Armada and aided the English victory many courtiers were convinced that Dee had conjured it.

Thus, Dee became the model for the character of the sorcerer Prospero in Shakespeare’s The Tempest. But it was also believed Drake was a wizard and sold his soul to the Devil in exchange for success over the Spanish. It is claimed that he also organized several covens of witches to work magically to raise the storm and prevent the invasion.[37]

Dee was a close friend of the spy and explorer Sir Walter Raleigh (1554-1618). Instrumental in the English colonization of North America, Raleigh was granted a royal patent to explore Virginia, which paved the way for future English settlements. Raleigh as well was interested in magic. In his History of the World, Raleigh explains that for the most part the reputation of magic was unfairly maligned, and that in former times magicians were known as wisemen: the Persians as Magi, the Babylonians as Chaldeans, Greeks as philosophers, and Jews as Kabbalists, “who better understood the power of nature, and how to apply things that work to things that suffer.”[38]

Raleigh’s half-brother Sir Humphrey Gilbert (c. 1539 – 1583) tried to establish a permanent colony in North America and Newfoundland, without much success. Gilbert then took a more southerly route across the Atlantic. In 1584, he sent out an exploratory expedition which located Roanoke Island, now in North Carolina, and returned to England that autumn. The following year he sent out a military expedition under Sir Richard Grenville, which built a fort there and remained until spring 1586.

The Rosicrucians
According to Frances Yates, the Rosicrucian movement was the result of the visit of John Dee to Prague in Bohemia, then part of the Holy Roman Empire ruled by the Catholic Habsburgs. Through conversations with angels, Dee believed himself to be invested with special responsibilities of communication he shared with the great biblical prophets Elijah, Enoch, and St. John, the author of the Book of Revelation.[39] The angels also promised that Dee would serve to restore religious unity through reconciliation between Catholics and Protestants. According to Peter French, Dee believed in a “Hermetic religion of love” that would heal the divisions between Protestants and Catholics.[40]

But Dee also believed that the prophecies were “to be published … all the World over.”[41] The angels told Dee that he would help lead the establishment of a new, angelically-revealed universal religion that would also include the Jews and Muslims.[42] The conversion of the Jews was crucial to the apocalyptic expectations of Dee’s time. According to Deborah Harkness, “Many of Dee’s remarks about conversion in the angel conversations concerned them and combined a paradoxical though fairly common early modern blend of anti-Semitism with an intense interest in secret, mystical Hebrew knowledge.”[43]

To gain support for his political ambitions, Dee continued to search for a sponsor though neither Elizabeth nor Philip II of Spain expressed any interest in his plans. In 1583, when Dee was in Prague he tried to interest the mystically-inclined Rudolph II, King of Bohemia and Holy Roman Emperor, in his imperialist agenda and angelic communications. The angels commanded Dee to tell the emperor he was possessed by demons, and command him to heed the angelic message. “If you will hear me, and believe me, you shall Triumph,” Dee told Rudolf, but “If you will not hear me, The Lord, the God that made Heaven and Hell… will throw you headlong down from your seat.”[44] The objective of Dee’s mission was referred to by a contemporary observer:

A learned and renowned Englishman whose name was Doctor Dee came to Prague to see the Emperor Rudolf II and was at first well received by him; he predicted that a miraculous reformation would presently come about in the Christian world and would prove the ruin not only of the city of Constantinople but of Rome also. These predictions he did not cease to spread among the populace.[45]

However, Rudolf nevertheless rejected Dee’s invitation as well. Dee’s fortunes back in England were not much better. Elizabeth did not marry, and as she had no direct heir she was therefore succeeded by King James IV of Scotland, who became King James I of England. James did not share Elizabeth’s sympathies for Dee, and when he appealed to the king for help in clearing his reputation from charges of conjuring devils, the King ignored him. Dee finally died disgraced and in abject poverty in 1608. Nevertheless, Dee’s influence in Bohemia resulted in a subversive movement for universal religious reform which rallied the Protestant cause against the Habsburg rulers.

In 1618 the largely Protestant estates of Bohemia rebelled against their Catholic King Ferdinand, triggering the outbreak of the Thirty Years’ War. Expecting that King James would come to their aid, in 1619, the Rosicrucians granted the throne of Bohemia to Frederick in direct opposition to the Catholic Habsburg rulers. The Rosicrucians had announced themselves to the world with the publication of the notorious Rosicrucian Manifestos. The first of these, purportedly written by Johann Valentin Andreae (1586 – 1654), was the Fama Frateritatis, an allegorical history of the Rosicrucians, which appeared in 1614, and followed by a second tract a year later. The Fama was part of a larger Protestant treatise titled, The Universal and General Reformation of the Whole Wide World; together with the Fama Fraternatis of the Laudable Fraternity of the Rosy Cross, Written to All the Learned and the Rulers of Europe.

The Manifestos appeared around the same time that the German prince Frederick V, Elector of the Palatinate of the Rhine, began to be seen as the ideal incumbent to take the place of leader of the Protestant resistance against the Catholic Hapsburgs. While Frederick had powerful connections with French Protestants, most importantly, in 1613, he had married Elizabeth Stuart, daughter of King James of England. The marriage of Frederick and Elizabeth represented an important dynastic alliance, in order to bolster the Protestant movement. The perceived importance of their marriage was enshrined in occult and alchemical symbolism in a Rosicrucian tract called The Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz.

Frederick accepted the offer and was crowned on 4 November of that year. However, James opposed the takeover of Bohemia from the Habsburgs, and Frederick’s allies in the Protestant Union failed to support him militarily by signing the Treaty of Ulm in 1620. Frederick’s brief reign as King of Bohemia ended with his defeat at the Battle of White Mountain in the same year. Imperial forces invaded the Palatinate and Frederick had to flee to Holland in 1622, where he lived the rest of his life in exile with Elizabeth and their children, mostly at The Hague, and died in Mainz in 1632. For his short reign of a single winter, Frederick is often nicknamed the “Winter King.”

Invisible College
After fleeing to England, the Rosicrucians were responsible for fanning the Kabbalistic millenarian expectations among the English Puritans about the approach of the Messianic time that became popular in the seventeenth century. A close friend of Oliver Cromwell, Dury was among a number of Puritans who held millenarians expectations, framed by a belief in the imminent conversion of the Jews. As noted by Richard Popkin, the leading scholar of millenarianism, “Since the 1640s in various Jewish and Christian circles, a deep hope had sprung up that great events would occur in the near future. It was believed that the final redemption was at hand. The hope for tikkun, restoration, was widespread.”[46] Ultimately, explains Popkin:

[The millenarians] took seriously the injunction in Daniel that, as the end approaches, knowledge and understanding will increase, the wise will understand, while the wicked will not. They also took seriously the need to prepare, through reform, for the glorious days ahead. Their efforts to gain and encourage scientific knowledge, to build a new educational system, to transform political society, were all part of their Millenarian reason of events. They needed to understand, to construct a new theory of knowledge, a new metaphysics, for the new situation, the Thousand Year reign of Christ on earth, which was to be followed by a new heaven and a new earth. Efforts to accomplish this great end are part of the making of the modern world and of the making of the modern mind.[47]

As Christopher Hill has indicated, in Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800, calculations of the precise date of the end of the world based on the Book of Daniel and Revelation occupied some of the best mathematicians, from Napier in the late sixteenth century, to Sir Isaac Newton at the end of the seventeenth. Consensus agreed that 1260 years should be added to the date the Antichrist established his power, which Protestants took to be the Pope. Various calculations therefore settled on the years 1650-1656 for his destruction, the gathering of the Gentiles, the conversion of the Jews and their return to Palestine. Other estimates offered the year 1666.[48]

Paul Nagel, the close friend of Jacob Boehme’s mentor Baltazar Walther, had been making similar predictions. According to Nagel, “for [the book of] Revelation is our true astronomy, and our astronomy is the true Revelation.”[49] After a brilliant comet had burned in the night skies above Europe in November and December of 1618, Nagel issued the Stellae Prodigiosae, in which he outlined a complex astrological-prophetic system. Based on biblical astronomical evidence, Nagel argued that this confluence of ideas demonstrated that the millennium, a time of future felicity for the church, led in spirit by Christ himself, would dawn in 1624. Following would be the great conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter in the trigon of Leo, Aries and Sagittarius in 1623. This “millennium” would endure just 42 years, until the Last Judgment in 1666.[50]

This belief was so prevalent that Manasseh ben Israel, in his letter to Oliver Cromwell and the Rump Parliament, appealed to it as a reason to readmit Jews into England, saying, “[T]he opinions of many Christians and mine do concur herein, that we both believe that the restoring time of our Nation into their native country is very near at hand.”[51]

A desire to better comprehend prophesies of the end times resulted in widespread interest in Jewish ideas on the subject. Most sought after was the knowledge of Menasseh Ben Israel, the son of a Marrano of Lisbon, who had suffered at the hands of the Inquisition, and had taken refuge in Amsterdam. Menasseh’s alliance with a scion of the Abarbanel family, in whose tradition of Davidic descent he was a firm believer, inspired him with the idea that he was destined to promote the coming of the Messiah. Menasseh’s marriage to his wife Rachel, a granddaughter of the Abarbanel, inspired him with the idea that he was destined to promote the coming of the Messiah. According to family legend, Menasseh’s wife was a descendant of King David, and he was proud of his children’s Davidic ancestry.[52]

Manasseh entered into correspondence with several of the more mystically-minded of the Puritans in England who had become interested in the question of Jewish immigration. Together with millenarians John Dury, Comenius and Samuel Hartlib, they formed the nucleus of a network called the Hartlib Circle, which was modeled on the lines of the “Invisible College” advocated in Rosicrucian writings, the precursor of the Royal Society. Hartlib had come to England in 1628, after the Catholic conquest of Elbing in Polish Prussia, as part of the disruptions of the Thirty Years War. When he arrived in England, he collected around him refugees from Poland, Bohemia and the Palatinate. Elizabeth Stuart, widow of Frederick V, Elector Palatine, was the chief patron of Hartlib, John Dury and John Comenius. Hartlib reported that Descartes, who has long been suspected of Rosicrucian sympathies, spent some time during the winter of 1634/35 at the house of Elizabeth Stuart. Descartes would develop a close relationship with her daughter, Elizabeth of Bohemia.[53]

Comenius was a Bishop of the Bohemian Brethren, heirs of the Hussite movement, a pre-Protestant movement that followed the teachings of Czech reformer Jan Hus, who became the best known representative of the Bohemian Reformation of the early fifteenth century. Not only was Huss stigmatized as a “Judaizer,” but when he was about to be burned at the stake for heresy in 1415, he was denounced with the words: “Oh thou accursed Judas, who breaking away from the counsels of peace, hast consulted with the Jews.”[54] Within fifty years of Huss’ death, a contingent of his followers, who had become independently organised as the “Bohemian Brethren,” received episcopal ordination through the Waldensians in 1467.[55] A note in the Book of Acts of the Theological Faculty of the University of Vienna, January 10, 1419, mentions a conspiracy between the Hussites, Waldensians and Jews.[56]

The plan for Andreae’s Societas Christiana was already set forth in two works that were believed to have been lost until they were discovered recently among the Hartlib papers. Comenius named Andreae as one of those who inspired him towards the reform of education. Considered the father of modern education, Comenius was one of the earliest champions of universal education, a concept eventually set forth in his book Didactica Magna.[57] Andreae recognized Comenius as his heir and encouraged him to carry on his reforming Rosicrucian ideas.

Among the extensive network of the Hartlib Circle was John Milton, author of Paradise Lost. Lucifer’s statement in Milton’s Paradise Lost, “Better to reign in hell, than serve in heav’n,” became an inspiration for those who embraced the rebellion against God. According to Matthew in Modern Satanism, “Shorn of all theistic implications, modern Satanism’s use of Satan is firmly in the tradition that John Milton inadvertently engendered—a representation of the noble rebel, the principled challenger of illegitimate power.”[58]

Resettlement of the Jews in England
In 1954, Menasseh Ben Israel met in Belgium with millenarian Isaac La Peyrère and Queen Christina of Sweden, an avid student of the occult. La Peyrère (1596–1676) was a Kabbalistic messianist born into a Huguenot family in Bordeaux, and possibly of Marrano Jewish descent. After reading La Peyrère’s Du Rappel des Juifs (1643), Menasseh rushed back to Amsterdam where he excitedly told a gathering of millenarians at the home of John Dury’s schoolmate and friend, Peter Serrarius, that the coming of the Jewish Messiah was imminent. La Peyrère, who is sometimes regarded as the father of Zionism, argued that the Jews were about to be recalled, that the Messiah was coming for them, that they should join the Christians, and with the king of France rebuild Zion.[59]

La Peyrère also served as secretary to the Prince of Condé. It has since emerged that, in fact: “Condé, Cromwell and Christina were negotiating to create a theological-political world state, involving overthrowing the Catholic king of France, among other things.”[60] La Peyrère also argued that the Messiah would join with the king of France, meaning the Prince of Condé, not Louis XIV, to liberate the Holy Land, rebuild the Temple and set up a world government of the Messiah with the king of France acting as regent. Then the Jews will rule the world from Jerusalem.

John Dury introduced Manasseh to the views of Antonio de Montesinos, who came to Amsterdam to inform the Jews, testifying under oath before Rabbi Menasseh ben Israel of his discovery of a remnant of the Lost Ten Tribes in South America.[61] Simultaneously other reports about the appearance of the Ten Tribes reached Jews and Christians, all this creating an atmosphere of excitement. According to Daniel 12:7, claimed Menasseh, this general dispersion was a necessary precondition for the final deliverance of the Jews. Manasseh therefore wrote a treatise on the Lost Tribes, Esperança de Israel (“Hope of Israel”), in support of the readmission of the Jews into England, and which proved, in his own words, “that the day of the promised Messiah unto us doth draw near.”[62] The tract was immediately successful, being very influential not only during the readmission campaign, but also a decade later when rumors circulated about the return of the Ten Tribes.[63]

Menasseh believed that the Messianic age needed as its precondition the settlement of Jews in all parts of the known world. Fired by this idea, he turned his attention to England where the Jews had been expelled since 1290. Lord Alfred Douglas, who edited Plain English, in an article of September 3, 1921, explained how records of the Synagogue of Muljeim revealed a plot between Menasseh and Oliver Cromwell which culminated in the execution of King Charles—the brother of Elizabeth Stuart—in 1649.[64] Parliament established an interim period of Commonwealth. In 1653, Cromwell terminated both his Parliament and the Commonwealth and, appointed himself Lord Protector.

The Cromwellian government was commonly regarded as a Rosicrucian circle. Samuel Butler (1612 – 1680), in his satire of the Restoration, Characters, tells of “the Brethren of the Rosy-Cross” as having attempted a misguided reformation of “their government.” A character in Butler’s other work Hudibras explains: “The Fraternity of the Rosy-Crucians is very like the Sect of the antient Gnostici who called themselves so, from the excellent Learning they pretend to, although they were really the most ridiculous Sots of all Mankind.”[65] According to Paul Benbridge, Cromwellians also referred to themselves as Rosicrucians, such as Andrew Marvell (1621 – 1678), a metaphysical poet and friend of Milton who sat in the House of Commons.[66]

Menasseh came to England in September 1655 with three other local rabbis, where they were lodged as guests of Cromwell. Cromwell summoned the most notable statesmen, lawyers, and theologians of the day to the Whitehall Conference in December. The chief result was the declaration that “there was no law which forbade the Jews’ return to England.” Though nothing was done to regularize the position of the Jews, the door was opened to their gradual return.

Cromwell was also closely acquainted with the Marrano merchants settled in London, who formed there a secret congregation, at the head of which was Antonio Fernandez Carvajal. When their group at Rouen had been denounced to the authorities as secret Jews many of them eventually fled to London. All were living nominally as Catholics, attending mass regularly in the Chapel of the French or Savoy Ambassador. They conducted extensive business with the Levant, East and West Indies, Canary Islands, and Brazil, but particularly with the Netherlands, Spain, and Portugal. By forming an important link in the network of trade spread throughout the Spanish and Portuguese territories by the Marranos, their position enabled them to provide Cromwell important information as to the plans both of Charles Stuart in Holland and of the Spanish in the New World.

Cromwell had been moved to sympathy with the Jewish cause chiefly because he foresaw the importance for English commerce of the presence of the Jewish merchant princes, some of whom had already found their way to London. As Richard Christopher Hill explained:

The Jews’ potential usefulness to the development of a forward colonial and commercial foreign policy was an additional reason for English interest in them. As early as 1643 Jews in the Netherlands were said to be financing Parliament. Their command of bullion was enormous; they controlled the Spanish and Portuguese trades; the Levant trade was largely in their hands; they were interested in developing commerce with the East and West Indies. To governments they were useful as contractors and as spies. If the ambitious scheme for Anglo-Dutch union put forward by the Commonwealth in 1661 had come off, then the Jews in the Netherlands would have been taken together with the Dutch colonial empire and its trade. When the Dutch refused to be incorporated into the British Empire, Dutch merchants were to totally excluded from all British possessions by the Navigation Act of 1651. This development made many Jews in the Netherlands—especially those trading with the West Indies—anxious to transfer to London: and it redoubled the interest of the English government in attracting them there. The policy paid off: Jewish intelligence helped the preparations for Cromwell’s Western Design of 1655.[67]

The Western Design was a part of the Anglo-Spanish War, a conflict between the English Protectorate of Oliver Cromwell and Spain, between 1654 and 1660. It involved an attack on the Spanish West Indies that was intended to secure a base of operations in the Caribbean from which to threaten trade and treasure routes in the Spanish Main, thus weakening Catholic influence in the New World. In 1655, Cromwell sent an expedition led by Sir William Penn, and General Robert Venables, who invaded Spanish territory in the West Indies with the objective of capturing Hispaniola. However, the assault failed because the Spanish had improved their defenses in the face of Dutch attacks earlier in the century. Despite various subsequent successes, such as an established presence in Jamaica, Cromwell saw the operation as a general failure, and Venables and Penn were imprisoned therefore in the Tower of London on their arrival on England.

Sabbatai Zevi
When Cromwell died in 1658, his despotic legacy fell to his son Richard who did not possess his father’s ruthlessness, with the result that it was not long before Charles II the late king’s son was invited back to rule as King of England in 1660. In that same year, the Royal Society was established and Charles II became its patron. It consisted of a number of natural philosophers around Robert Boyle and the Hartlib Circle. Theodore Haak, who was Comenius’ agent in England and also a refugee of the Palatinate,[68] is credited with having started the meetings which led to its foundation. Another founding member was John Dury’s son-in-law Henry Oldenburg, who met with Menasseh on his visit to London.

As Christopher Hill has indicated, in Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800, calculations of the precise date of the end of the world based on the Book of Daniel and Revelation occupied some of the best mathematicians, from Napier in the late sixteenth century, to Sir Isaac Newton, a member of the Royal Society, at the end of the seventeenth. Newton was committed to interpretations of the “Restoration” of the Jews to their own land of Palestine and spent the remaining years of his intellectual life exploring the Book of Daniel. Consensus agreed that 1260 years should be added to the date the Antichrist established his power, which Protestants took to be the Pope. Various calculations therefore settled on the years 1650-1656 for his destruction, the gathering of the Gentiles, the conversion of the Jews and their return to Palestine. Other estimates offered the year 1666, the same year that Sabbatai Zevi announced himself as the Jewish messiah, duping an estimate half of the world’s Jewish population.[69]

As Jacob Barnai has shown, among the more avid readers of Menasseh ben Israel’s Hope of Israel were none other than Sabbatai Zevi and his followers.[70] The Jewish community of Amsterdam had been kept informed of the progress of Sabbatai’s mission through Peter Serrarius, at whose home Menasseh ben Israel first shared his conviction in the immanent advent of the messiah. As soon as news reached Amsterdam about Sabbatai Zevi, Serrarius was publishing pamphlets in English and Dutch telling everyone about the signs of the messianic era and that the King of the Jews had arrived.[71]

Almost the entire Jewish community of Amsterdam had become followers of Sabbatai Zevi, having been kept informed of the progress of Sabbatai’s mission through a friend of John Dury, Peter Serrarius, at whose home Menasseh ben Israel first shared his conviction in the imminent advent of the messiah. In 1664, Serrarius rushed into a synagogue after the appearance of a comet and he birth of a two-headed cow, and he and the rabbis performed gematria and concluded that the Messiah would arrive in 1666.[72] As soon as news reached Amsterdam about Zevi, Serrarius was publishing pamphlets in English and Dutch telling everyone about the signs of the messianic era and that the King of the Jews had arrived.[73] Menasseh and La Peyrère’s co-conspirator, Queen Christina, became so fascinated with the claims of Sabbatai Zevi that she nearly became a disciple. She reportedly danced in the streets of Hamburg with Jewish friends in anticipation of the apocalyptic event.[74]

Among Serrarius’ intimate friends were John Dury and Comenius, both of whom he was able to convince of Zevi’s messiahship.[75] Dury, who had been working for twenty-five years for the conversion of the Jews as a precondition for the Second Coming, spent much time trying to figure out where Zevi fit in the expected Christian scenario about the “end of days.” He offered the interpretation that God was rewarding the Jews by having their messianic moment occur, and punishing Christians because they were not “pure” enough.[76]

Serrarius was also in contact with the alchemist Franciscus Mercurius van Helmont, author of the Alphabetum Naturale Hebraicum (1667), and the Christian Kabbalist Christian Knorr von Rosenroth, famous for his Kabbala Denudata. Van Helmont had served on a diplomatic mission on behalf of Elisabeth of Bohemia, the daughter of Elizabeth Stuart and Frederich V of the Palatinate who was living in Herford, Germany, when he met with Henry More and Robert Boyle. Serrarius died in 1669 on his way to Turkey to meet with Zevi.

New Atlantis
According to Rosicrucian legend, the founding of America was based on Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis, that tells the story of a country ruled by philosopher-scientists in their great college called Solomon’s House, which had provided inspiration for the Invisible College, and the Hartlib Circle, which became the Royal Society.[77] Sir Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626) was chancellor of England in the reign of King James, and supervised the translation of the King James Bible. Bacon was also suspected of being the true author of Shakespeare’s plays. Likewise, explains Dame Frances Yates, in The Rosicrucian Enlightenment, “Shakespeare’s preoccupation with the occult, with ghosts, witches, fairies, is understood as deriving less from popular tradition than from deep-rooted affinity with the learned occult philosophy and its religious implications.”[78] fHe is considered the father of modern science, having emphasized the importance of experimentation in his landmark work, The Advancement of Learning.

However, recent scholarship has shown that he was committed to the Renaissance occult tradition, and his survey of science included a review of magic, astrology, and a reformed version of alchemy.[79] On 22 January 1621, in honor of his sixtieth birthday, a select group of men assembled in the large banquet hall at Bacon’s York House for what has been described as a Masonic banquet.[80] Only those of the Rosicrosse (Rosicrucians) and the Masons who were already aware of Bacon’s leadership role were invited.[81] On that day, a long-time friend of Bacon, the poet Ben Jonson, best known for his satirical plays, Volpone, The Alchemist, and Bartholomew Fair, gave a Masonic ode to Bacon.

Long popular in occult circles, the Atlantis myth was first mentioned by Plato, referring to a lost continent that had existed in the Atlantic Ocean. Mediaeval European writers, who received the tale from Arab geographers, believed the mythical island to have actually existed, and later writers tried to identify it with an actual country. When America was discovered, the Spanish historian Francesco Lopez de Gomara, in his General History of the Indes, suggested that Plato’s Atlantis and the new continents were the same, a theory repeated by Bacon. To understand the Masonic perspective of this history, Manly P. Hall in The Secret Destiny of America explained:

Bacon quickly realized that here in the new world was the proper environment for the accomplishment of his great dream, the establishment of the philosophic empire. It must be remembered that Bacon did not play a lone hand; he was the head of a secret society including in its membership the most brilliant intellectuals of his day. All these men were bound together by a common oath to labor in the cause of a world democracy. Bacon’s society of the unknown philosophers included men of high rank and broad influence. Together with Bacon, they devised the colonization scheme.[82]

Bacon played a leading role in creating the British colonies, especially in Virginia, the Carolinas, and Newfoundland in northeastern Canada. In New Atlantis, Bacon suggests that the continent of America was the former Atlantis where there existed an advanced race during the Golden Age of civilization. Bacon tells the story of a country ruled by philosopher-scientists in their great college called Solomon’s House. They described the purpose of their brotherhood: “The end of our foundation is the knowledge of causes, and secret motions of things; and the enlarging of the bounds of human empire, to the effecting of all things possible.” Having gained superior knowledge imparted to them by heavenly beings, they possessed flying machines and ships with which they travel under the sea.

Following in the steps of John Dee, Bacon lent his group’s support behind the English plan to colonize America. An attempt to colonize the New World was made under the initial leadership in 1602 of Bartholomew Gosnold (1571 –1607), a cousin twice over of Francis Bacon and four times over of the 17th Earl of Oxford, whom Oxfordians believe was Shakespeare. Gosnold was an English lawyer, explorer, and privateer and a friend of Richard Hakluyt and sailed with Walter Raleigh. Gosnold was instrumental in founding the Virginia Company of London, and Jamestown in colonial America. Gosnold’s voyage was funded by the Earl of Southampton, Shakespeare’s patron. He led the first recorded European expedition to Cape Cod. He is considered by Preservation Virginia to be the “prime mover of the colonization of Virginia.” Following the coastline for several days, he discovered Martha’s Vineyard and named it after his daughter, Martha, and established a small post on Cuttyhunk Island, one of the Elizabeth Islands, near Gosnold, now in Massachusetts.

Bacon claimed that the New Kingdom on Earth which was Virginia exemplified the Kingdom of Heaven. Bacon’s involvement in American colonization is demonstrated by William Strachey, who in 1618 dedicated a manuscript copy of his Historie of Travaile into Virginia Britania to Bacon:

Your Lordship ever approving yourself a most noble fautor [favourer] of the Virginia plantation, being from the beginning (with other lords and earls) of the principal counsell applied to propagate and guide it.[83]

Bacon is listed in the 1609 charter as a shareholder of the Virginia Company of London and one of the 52 members of the Virginia Council. The Virginia Company refers collectively to a joint stock company chartered by James I in 1606, with the purposes of establishing settlements on the coast of North America. The two companies, called the “Virginia Company of London” (or the London Company) and the “Virginia Company of Plymouth” (or Plymouth Company) operated with identical charters but with differing territories. An area of overlapping territory was created within which the two companies were not permitted to establish colonies within one hundred miles of each other. The Plymouth Company never fulfilled its charter, and its territory that later became New England was at that time also claimed by England.

The Mayflower
The Plymouth Company was permitted to establish settlements roughly between the upper reaches of the Chesapeake Bay and the current US-Canada border. In 1607, the Plymouth Company established the Popham Colony along the Kennebec River in present day Maine. However, it was abandoned after about a year, and the Plymouth Company became inactive. With the religious Pilgrims who arrived aboard the iconic Mayflower, whose leaders were Rosicrucians, a successor company to the Plymouth Company eventually established a permanent settlement in Plymouth, Massachusetts in 1620 in what is now New England.

According to Nicholas Hagger in The Secret Founding of America: The Real Story of Freemasons, Puritans, & the Battle for The New World, “Indeed, so close were Puritanism and Rosicrucianism in essence that it can be said that the Puritan philosophy was actually Rosicrucian.”[84]

The Puritans were a group of English Reformed Protestants in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries who sought to “purify” the Church of England from all Roman Catholic practices, maintaining that the Church of England had only been partially reformed. However, when James I took the throne in 1603, he declared he would put an end to church reform movements, and deal harshly with radical critics of the Church of England. A group dissatisfied with the efforts of the Puritans, decided they would sever all ties, and became known as Separatists led by John Robinson and William Brewster. However, in 1608, shortly after James I declared the Separatist Church illegal, the congregation emigrated Leiden where they were joined by Rosicrucian circles. It was here that Brewster set up a new printing company in order to publish leaflets promoting the Separatist aims and pamphlets supporting the Rosicrucian cause.[85]

Puritanism, especially Dutch Puritanism, was strongly linked to Rosicrucianism. For example, John Wilkins, Frederick V’s chaplain, was closely linked to Rosicrucianism in the Palatinate and tutored Frederick and Elizabeth’s son when he was sent to England. Wilkins co-founded the Royal Society when the Invisible College met in his rooms at Wadham College, Oxford, from 1648 to 1659, and he had a deep connection with Puritanism.[86]

In November 1620, following the outbreak of the Thirty Years War, which erupted after the Habsburgs set out to crush the Rosicrucian movement, Frederick V and Elizabeth Stuart fled into exile in The Hague in the Netherlands, and numerous Rosicrucianism migrated with them. The reason Frederick and Elizabeth sought refuge in the Netherlands was not only because of the liberal principles adopted by the republic, but also because of the hospitality offered by Maurice, the prince of Orange. Maurice had been educated at Heidelberg University in the Palatinate, where he had met Simon Studion and other founding members of the Rosicrucian movement. It was Maurice, in fact, who had offered the English Separatists a safe haven in Leiden in 1608. After their flight from Bohemia in 1619, Maurice granted Elizabeth and Frederick asylum in Holland. He let them use his home in The Hague and gave them another residence in Leiden.[87]

It was to Brewster’s home in Leiden in 1615 that fled Pierre Du Gua de Monts (c. 1558 – 1628), a French merchant, explorer and colonizer with Rosicrucian connections.[88] Du Gua, a Calvinist founded the first permanent French settlement in Canada. He travelled to northeastern North America for the first time in 1599 with Pierre de Chauvin de Tonnetuit. He sent Samuel de Champlain to open a colony at Quebec in 1608, thus playing a major role in the foundation of the first permanent French colony in North America.

Du Gua was also a member of the School of Night, a modern name for a group of men centered on Sir Walter Raleigh that was once referred to in 1592 as the “School of Atheism.” The group supposedly included poets and scientists Christopher Marlowe, George Chapman and Thomas Harriot. Marlowe was the author of Doctor Faustus, which is the most controversial Elizabethan play outside of Shakespeare. It is based on the German story of Faust, a highly successful scholar who is dissatisfied with his life, which leads him to make a pact with the Devil, and exchange his soul for unlimited knowledge and worldly pleasures. There is no firm evidence that all of these men were known to each other, but speculation about their connections features prominently in some writing about the Elizabethan era.

When the Fama Fraternitatis publicly announced the existence of the Rosicrucian fraternity in 1610, the document was circulated in Paris, and one of the first to publicly respond to it was Du Gua.[89] In 1615 the Queen Mother discovered Du Gua’s authorship of anti-government pamphlets and ordered his arrest. With a price on his head, Du Gua fled to the Netherlands where he stayed with Brewster. Brewster had been a student of Greek and Latin at Cambridge University in the mid-1580s, at the same time as William Shakespeare’s colleague Christopher Marlowe, through whom he had met Walter Raleigh and began to attend the meetings of the School of Night, and subsequently struck up a close friendship with Du Gua. The last known Rosicrucian document, published in Latin by Brewster in Leiden in 1615, was called the Confessio Fraternitatis, or “Confession of the Fraternity,” and was written under a pseudonym, Philip A Gabella (Philip the Cabalist), while some scholars have proposed that its true author was Pierre Du Gua.[90]

Other Rosicrucians also congregated in Leiden at precisely the same time, in February 1620, just prior to the Mayflower’s voyage, suggesting that they beyond England, they were also looking for refuge in the New World following their escape from the Palatinate. Johann Valentin Andreae, the author of the Fama Fraternitatis, was already there, having left Germany when war broke out. Fulke Greville, whose London house was used for the early meetings of the School of Night and who had been present at Elizabeth’s “Alchemical Wedding,” was there. Francis Bacon was visiting Maurice of Orange in his official position as English lord chancellor to discuss the legality of a trade treaty with the Netherlands. The playwright Ben Jonson was present in Leiden, performing a play at a new theater. And the architect Inigo Jones, although not staying in Leiden itself, was in nearby Amsterdam working on plans for a church he had been commissioned to build in the city.

At the very time, the English Separatists in the city decided the only hope for religious freedom lay in North America. In 1620, a large part of the Separatist congregation sailed for the New World aboard a ship named the Mayflower, with 102 passengers, Brewster, and all the Pilgrim Fathers, the name later given to the original nine elders of the church. On November 9, 1620, they sighted land, which was present-day Cape Cod.

New England
According to American Rosicrucian legend, the order was brought to America in 1694 under the leadership of Grand Master Johannes Kelpius. Born in Transylvania, Kelpius was a follower of Johann Jacob Zimmerman, an avid disciple of Jacob Böhme, who was also “intimately acquainted” with Rotterdam merchant Benjamin Furly.[91] Furly was the leader of the Lantern, a circle around Benjamin Furly, which included alchemists van Helmont, Lady Conway, Henry More and John Locke. Furly and van Helmont were also connected with a group of students of Jacob Boehme which included Serrarius and who also knew and associated with Baruch Spinoza.

Zimmerman was referred to by German authorities as “most learned astrologer, magician and cabbalist.”[92] With his followers in the Society of the Woman in the Wilderness, Kelpius came to believe that the end of the world would occur in 1694. This belief, based on an elaborate interpretation of a passage from the Book of Revelation, anticipated the advent of a heavenly kingdom somewhere in the wilderness during that year. Answering Sir William Penn’s call to establish a godly country in his newly acquired American lands, Kelpius felt that Pennsylvania, given its reputation for religious toleration at the edge of a barely settled wilderness, was the best place to be.

Pennsylvania was founded by the son of Sir William Penn, William Penn. Penn became close friends with Elisabeth Stuart, celebrating her in the second edition of his book No Cross, No Crown. Penn, a friend of John Dury, was also a member of the Lantern, a circle around Rotterdam merchant Benjamin Furly, which included alchemists van Helmont, Lady Conway, Henry More and John Locke. Furly and van Helmont were also connected with a group of students of Jacob Boehme which included Serrarius and who also knew and associated with Baruch Spinoza. Furly, like Penn, was a Quaker and a close supporter of George Fox, the founder of the movement, which provided the guiding principles of the new state of Pennsylvania.

At some time, Penn came into contact with German Rosicrucian Jacob Boehme’s teachings and the Rosicrucians who introduced him into the deeper mystical and metaphysical studies. In New World Mystics, Dr. Palo writes:

Penn had a more than passing interest in mysticism and the Rosae Crucis. He referred to Jacob Boehme as his master in the art and law of divine wisdom.[93]

Palo includes a footnote indicating that William Penn visited Pietist conventicles in Europe. They were initiatic collegiums for Rosicrucians:

…he visited Pietist conventicles which were held in an air of great secrecy and danger of exposure. He invited the Rosae Crucis to settle on his land [in America]… These Pietists or Rosicrucians were thought unorthodox and hence undesirable in the eye of the politico-religious powers of Europe. They were accused of mixing Christian tenets with the practices of Ancient Egypt and some of the doctrines of Zoroaster.”

As further explained by Palo, after Penn’s first trip to America in 1681, on several trips he made back to Europe, he had come into contact with individuals in England, Holland and Germany, who were playing an important role in executing a plan to establish a Rosicrucian colony in America by 1694. Notable among them were William Markham of The Philadelphic Society in London, who would serve later as Penn’s Deputy Governor of Pennsylvania, and Jacob Isaac Van Bebber, a German Rosicrucian, who later purchased a thousand acres of land from Penn for the purpose of establishing a colony in America. [94]

In 1682, William Penn founded the city of Philadelphia, named after one of the “Seven Churches of Asia” mentioned in the Book of Revelation 3:10, as “the church steadfast in faith, that had kept God’s word and endured patiently.” Philadelphia played an instrumental role in the American Revolution as a meeting place for the Founding Fathers of the United States, who signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776 and the Constitution in 1787. Philadelphia was one of the nation’s capitals during the Revolutionary War, and served as temporary US capital while Washington DC was under construction.

John Winthrop (1587 –1649) a wealthy English Puritan lawyer, also a member of the Hartlib Circle, as well as an alchemist and follower of John Dee, sailed across the Atlantic on the Arbella, leading to the founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.[95] On 12 June 1630, the Arbella led the small fleet bearing the next 700 settlers into Salem harbor. Salem may have inspired the city of Bensalem in Bacon’s New Atlantis, which was published in 1627. The settlement of Salem by Rosicrucians would explain the existence of witchcraft in the city, which would have given cause to the famous witch trails of 1692. Frances Yates notes that Dee’s influence later spread to Puritanism in the New World through John Winthrop’s son, John Winthrop, Jr., an alchemist and a follower of Dee. Winthrop used Dee’s esoteric symbol, the Monas Hieroglyphica, as his personal mark.[96]

Winthrop’s arrival signaled the beginning of the Great Migration. The term Great Migration usually refers to the migration in this period of English settlers, primarily Puritans to Massachusetts and the warm islands of the West Indies, especially the sugar rich island of Barbados, 1630–40. From 1630 through 1640 approximately 20,000 colonists came to New England. They came in family groups (rather than as isolated individuals) and were motivated chiefly by a quest for freedom to practice their Puritan religion. Winthrop’s noted words, a “City upon a Hill,” refer to a vision of a new society, not just economic opportunity.

Rev. George Phillips, the founder of the Congregational Church in America, arrived on the Arbella in 1630 with Governor Winthrop. In 1781, Phillips’s great-grandson, banker Dr. John Phillips, established Exeter Academy, a prestigious American private prep school in New Hampshire, and is one of the oldest secondary schools in the US. The Economist described the school as belonging to “an elite tier of private schools” in Britain and America that counts Eton and Harrow in its ranks. Exeter has a long list of famous former students, including Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., Gore Vidal, Stewart Brand, Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, novelist John Irving, and Dan Brown the author of The Da Vinci Code and the Masonic-inspired The Lost Symbol.

Full list of Marranos Christians archived here.

[1] Joachin Prinz, The Secret Jews (New York: Random House, 1973) p. 5.

[2] Al Imran 3: 72.

[3] Lucas Tudensis: De Altera vita jideigue controversiis adversus Albigensium errores; ed. Mariana, Ingolstadt, 1612, pp. 189-190; cited in Louis I. Newman. Jewish Influences on Christian Reform Movements, p. 140

[4] Ezer Kahanoff, “On Marranos and Sabbateans: A Reexamination of Charismatic Religiosity – Its Roots, Its Place and Its Significance in the Life of the Western Sephardi Diaspora.”

[5] C.P. Thompson. St. John of the Cross: Songs in the Night (London: SPCK, 2002), p. 27.

[6] John mentions Dionysius explicitly four times—S2.8.6; N2.5.3; CB14-15.16; Ll3-3.49. Luis Girón-Negrón, “Dionysian thought in sixteenth-century Spanish mystical theology,” Modern Theology, 24(4), (2008), p. 699.

[7] Lupieri Edmondo. “Friar of Ignatius of Jesus (Carlo Leonelli) and the First ‘Scholarly’ Book on Mandaeaism (1652).” ARAM Periodical, 2004, 16 (Mandaeans and Manichaeans): pp. 25–46.

[8] Anna Foa. “Teresa’s ‘marrano’ grandfather.” Osservatore Romano (March 2, 2015).

[9] The Menorah, Volumes 20-23, (Intercollegiate Menorah Association, 1932), p. 163; Vicente Blasco Ibáñez. The Borgias: or, At the feet of Venus. (P. Dutton & Co. Inc., 1930), p. 242, 313; Sarah Bradford. Lucrezia Borgia: Life, Love and Death in Renaissance Italy.

[10] Arsenic: A Murderous History. (Dartmouth Toxic Metals Research Program, 2009).

[11] Ezer Kahanoff, “On Marranos and Sabbateans: A Reexamination of Charismatic Religiosity – Its Roots, Its Place and Its Significance in the Life of the Western Sephardi Diaspora”

[12] Antonio Domingues Ortiz (Ediciones ISTMOS: Madrid) []

[13] The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews, (Leiden: Brill, 2009)

[14] Cecil Roth. History of the Marranos (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1932), p. 271.

[15] Charles Garcia. “Was Columbus secretly a Jew?” CNN (May 24, 2012).

[16] Charles Garcia. “Was Columbus secretly a Jew?” CNN (May 24, 2012).

[17] Charles Garcia. “Was Columbus secretly a Jew?” CNN (May 24, 2012).

[18] Pere Bonnin. Sangre Judia. (Flor de Viento, Barcelona, 2006).

[19] Andrew Brooks. “Jewish Voyagers to the New World Emerging From History’s Mists.” New York Times (July 29, 1997).

[20] Andrew Brooks. “Jewish Voyagers to the New World Emerging From History’s Mists.” New York Times (July 29, 1997).

[21] Andrew Brooks. “Jewish Voyagers to the New World Emerging From History’s Mists.” New York Times (July 29, 1997).

[22] “Arqueólogo sugiere que conquistador Francisco Pizarro fue de origen judío.” Historia De Lima Virreinal (January 21, 2008).

[23] “Luther, Martin.” In: Encyclopaedia Judaica , 2nd Edition, Volume 13, (Detroit, New York and others, 2007).

[24] “Martin Luther (1483-1546).” Jewish Response to Anti-Semitism []

[25] Otto Kirn. “Melanchthon, Philipp.” Jackson, Samuel Macauley. New Schaff–Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. 7 (3rd ed.). (New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1910). pp. 282.

[26] Gotthard Deutsch & Frederick T. Haneman. “Reuchlin, Johann von.” (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906).

[27] Franes Yates. The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age. (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979), p. 32; Erika Rummel. The case against Johann Reuchlin. (University of Toronto Press, 2002), pp. iv–xv.

[28] George Edwin Rines, ed.. “Reuchlin, Johann.” Encyclopedia Americana (1920).

[29] Louis I. Newman. Jewish Influences on Christian Reform Movements (Columbia University Press, 1925) p. 626.

[30] H. H. Ben-Sasson, “The Reformation in Contemporary Jewish Eyes,” in: PIASH, 4 (1970); S.W. Baron, in: Diogenes, 16, no. 61 (1968), 32–51; “Reformation,” Jewish Virtual Library.

[31] Ibid.

[32] Charles Bowie Millican, Spenser and the Table Round, (New York: Octagon, 1932).

[33] Patrick Collinson, “Truth, lies and fiction in sixteenth-century Protestant historiography.” The Historical Imagination in Early Modern Britain: History, Rhetoric, and Fiction, 1500-1800. ed. Donald R. Kelley, David Harris Sacks. (Cambridge University Press, 1991).

[34] Frances Yates, The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age, (London: Routledge, 1979) p. 90.

[35] “The Enochian Apocalypse,” in Richard Metzger. Book of Lies: The Disinformation Guide to Magick and the Occult (second ed.). (Newburyport, Massachusetts: Red Wheel/Weiser/Conari, 2008),

[36] Ken MacMillan. “Discourse on history, geography, and law: John Dee and the limits of the British empire, 1576–80.” Canadian Journal of History (April 2001).

[37] Michael Howard. “The British Occult Secret Service.” New Dawn, (May 10, 2008).

[38] The History of the World. (New YorK: B. Franklin, 1829) Chap. XI, p. 385.

[39] Deboarah E. Harkness. John Dee’s Conversations with Angels Cabala, Alchemy, and the End of Nature. (Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 136.

[40] Peter French, John Dee: The World of an Elizabethan Magus (New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972), pp. 123-125.

[41] John Dee, John Dee’s Actions with Spirits, edited with an introduction by Christopher Whitby. 2 vols. Vol. II: 376-377.

[42] Deboarah E. Harkness. John Dee’s Conversations with Angels Cabala, Alchemy, and the End of Nature. (Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 149.

[43] Deboarah E. Harkness. John Dee’s Conversations with Angels Cabala, Alchemy, and the End of Nature. (Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 150.

[44] John Dee and Edward Kelly, A True and Faithful Relation of what happened for many years…, edited by Meric Casaubon, pp. 230-231; cited in Deborah E. Harkness. John Dee’s Conversations with Angels (Cambridge University Press, 1999) p. 55.

[45] quoted by R. J. W. Evans, Rudolf II and his World, (Oxford, 1973), p. 224.

[46] Richard H. Popkin, “Introduction” in Yosef Kaplan, Henry Mechoulan and Richard H. Popkin, Menasseh ben Israel and His World. (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1989) p. 173.

[47] Richard H. Popkin (ed.) Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800. (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1988) p 6.

[48] Christopher Hill, “Till the Conversion of the Jews.” Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800, Clark Library Lectures 1981-1982. (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1988) p. 13.

[49] Paul Nagel. Tabula Aurea M. Pauli Nagelii Lips. Mathematici, Darinnen Er den Andern Theil seiner Philosophiae Novae proponiren vnd fürstellenthut (n.p., 1624)., sig. D1v.

[50] Leigh T. I. Penman. “Climbing Jacob’s Ladder: Crisis, Chiliasm, and Transcendence in the Thought of Paul Nagel (†1624), a Lutheran Dissident during the Time of the Thirty Years’ War,” Intellectual History Review, 20: 2 (2010), pp. 201-226.

[51] Kaufmann Kohler and Henry Malter. “Shabbethai Zebi B. Mordecai,” Jewish Encyclopedia (refers to Grätz, “Gesch.” x., note 3, pp. xxix. et seq.

[52] Albert Montefiore Hyamson, A History of the Jews in England (1908), p. 182.

[53] Stephen Gaukroger. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. (Clarendon Press, 1995) p. 294.

[54] E. H.,Gillett. The Life and Times of John Huss, or the Bohemian Reformation of the Fifteenth Century. (Boston, 1864), ii, 64; cited in Louis I. Newman. Jewish Influences on Christian Reform Movements (Columbia University Press, 1925), p. 437.

[55] Rudolf Rican. The History of the Unity of Brethren (Interprovincial Board of Communication, 1992).

[56] Louis I. Newman. Jewish Influences on Christian Reform Movements (Columbia University Press, 1925), p. 437.

[57] Clare Goodrick-Clarke, “The Rosicrucian Afterglow.” The Rosicrucian Enlightenment Revisited, (Hudson, NY: Lindisfarne Press, 1999) p. 209.

[58] Chris Mathews. Modern Satanism: Anatomy of a Radical Subculture. (Wesport: Praeger, 2009) p. 54.

[59] “La Peyrère, Issac,” Jewish Virtual Library. […

[60] Garber & Ayers, Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, p. 407.

[61] Moses Rosen, “The Recipe” (published as epilogue to The Face of Survival, 1987); Nathan Ausubel, Pictorial History of the Jewish People, (Crown, 1953).

[62] Menasseh to Dury, 23 December 1649, in Wolf, Menasseh ben Israel’s Mission, p. Ixxviii.

[63] Richard H. Popkin, “Introduction” in Yosef Kaplan, Henry Mechoulan and Richard H. Popkin, Menasseh ben Israel and His World. (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1989), p. 174.

[64] Lord Alfred Douglas, Plain English, North British Publishing Co. (Sept. 3rd 1921).

[65] Samuel Butler, Hudibras, op. cit., Butler’s note to pt. 1, canto I, 527-544.

[66] Paul Benbridge, “The Rosicrucian Resurgence at the Court of Cromwell.” The Rosicrucian Enlightenment Revisited, (Hudson, NY: Lindisfarne Press, 1999) p. 225.

[67] Popkin, Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800, p. 29.

[68] Yates. The Rosicrucian Enlightenment, pp. 175-6.

[69] Christopher Hill, “Till the Conversion of the Jews.” Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought, 1650-1800, Clark Library Lectures 1981-1982. (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1988) p. 13.

[70] Cengiz Sisman. The Burden of Silence: Sabbatai Sevi and the Evolution of the Ottoman-Turkish Dönmes (Oxford University Press, 2015) p. 74.

[71] Daniel Frank. History of Jewish Philosophy. (London: Routledge, 1997) p. 607.

[72] Richard H. Popkin, Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought 1650-1800: Clark Library Lectures 1981-1982 (Brill Academic Publishers, 1997) p. 92.

[73] Daniel Frank. History of Jewish Philosophy. (London: Routledge, 1997) p. 607.

[74] Marsha Keith Schuchard, Restoring the Temple of Vision, p. 674.

[75] Mark Greengrass, Michael Leslie, Timothy Raylor, editors. Samuel Hartlib and Universal Reformation: Studies in Intellectual Communication. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994) p. 134.

[76] Richard H. Popkin, Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought 1650-1800: Clark Library Lectures 1981-1982 (Brill Academic Publishers, 1997) p. 92.

[77] Nicholas Hagger, The Secret Founding of America: The Real Story of Freemasons, Puritans, & the Battle for The New World (Watkins, 2009).

[78] Frances Yates, The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age.(London: Routledge, 1979) p. 90.

[79] Yates, The Rosicrucian Enlightenment, p. 119. See also Henry. The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science.

[80] Helene H. Armstrong, Francis Bacon – The Spear Shaker, (San Francisco, California: Golden Gate Press, 1985).

[81] Alfred Dodd, Francis Bacon’s Personal Life Story, Volume 2 – The Age of James, (England: Rider & Co., 1949, 1986). Pp. 157 – 158, 425, 502 – 503, 518 – 532.

[82] Manly P. Hall, The Secret Destiny of America (Los Angeles: Philosophical Research Society, 1944).

[83] Quoted in Manly P. Hall, America’s Assignment with Destiny, (The Philosophical Research Society, 1951), p. 69– 70.

[84] Nicholas Hagger, The Secret Founding of America: The Real Story of Freemasons, Puritans, & the Battle for The New World (Watkins, 2009).

[85] La vie d’un exploer (Paris: Laperouse, 1625) cited in Graham Philips, Merlin and the Discovery of Avalon in the New World. (Rochester, Vermont: Bear & Company, 2011).

[86] Hagger, op. cit., p. 122– 4

[87] C. Oman, The Winter Queen (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1938), ch. 50.

[88] Dagua’s autobiography survives in two volumes in La vie d’un explorer (Paris: Lapérouse, 1626).

[89] D. Simmons, Henri of Naverre (London: Blakewell, 1941), p. 67–78.

[90] D. Simmons, Henri of Naverre (London: Blakewell, 1941) p. 103.

[91] Julius Friedrich Sachse, The German Pietists of Provincial Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, 1895; New York, 1970 [reprint]), p. 258.

[92] ‘doctissimus Astrologus, Magus et Cabbalista’, cited in Levente Juhász, “Johannes Kelpius (1673–1708): Mystic on the Wissahickon,” in M. Caricchio, G. Tarantino, eds., Cromohs Virtual Seminars. Recent historiographical trends of the British Studies (17th-18th Centuries), 2006-2007: 1-9.

[93] “What Roles did Francis Bacon and Other Notable Rosicrucians Play in American Colonial Activity and the Establishment of a Democratic Republic?” Group Pictorial Presentation at The Queen Mary (Long Beach, CA, 1984).

[94] Linda S. Schrigner, et al. Bacon’s “Secret Society” – The Ephrata Connection: Rosicrucianism in Early America. (1983)

[95] Yates, The Rosicrucian Enlightenment (London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1972), p. 226.

[96] Frances Yates. The Rosicrucian Enlightenment. (London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1972). p. 226



Red Papacy

& Advent of Euro-Communism
by Michael Tsarion

The injection of Marxist tenets into Roman Catholicism is meant to undermine the economic and social structures of the lands where it is preached - Baron Avro Manhattan
Who was the most important Pope of recent times? In the opinion of the great Avro Manhattan it was Pope Pius XII, born Eugenio Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Pacelli.
Pope Pius XII (reigned from 1939 to 1958)
The reason anti-papist Baron Manhattan considered Pius XII so important is because of his attempt to form a close alliance between the Vatican and White House, in order to offset the threat of Communism and save Catholicism from extinction.

His objective was to overturn the Vatican-Moscow alliance crafted by his leftist predecessors after the Second World War. He was, however, successful only for a short time. He also intended to restore the Catholic Austro-Hungarian Empire which had, to the horror of the Papacy, been destroyed after the First World War. These intentions for the return of autocratic papal rule made Pius XII the implacable enemy of left-wing Jews, Orthodox Christians, Jesuits and Red Papists everywhere. The leaders of these groups knew that if Pius XII got his way, and if popes as right-wing as he continued to reign from Vatican City, the world of the near and far future was not going to take shape according to their liking. As far as they were concerned Pius XII had to be the last right-wing "non-progressive" potentate to occupy the chair of St. Peter.

After the Second World War, and spread of Communism throughout Europe and the world, powerful individuals within Holy See not only openly backed Communism, but secretly conceived a Socialism of their own, aimed at the subversion of existing political systems and the restoration total papal world control. Instead of a crude draconian Bolshevism despised by one and all, theirs was to be a relatively benign collectivist Socialism established with the approval of every slave under it. The resistance of men such as Pius XII - representing the old guard of autocrats - warned Red Papists to be careful and cunning when fomenting the particular kind of revolution they had in mind. With the death of Pius XII in 1958, a long era came to an end. From then on the Vatican's role in world affairs drastically changed, and those who opposed the swing to the left found themselves unable to return Catholicism to the way it had traditionally been, let alone improve it in healthy ways.

The conflict between factions began because of a brute fact that stared the Vatican in the face. Traditional religious belief was sharply declining. Clearly the forthcoming age was one in which the new generation believed not in medieval "infallible" theology, but in humanity, science, materialism and intellectual progress. Since nothing could be done to assuage the tide of individualism, dissent and revolution, the Vatican decided to piggy-back on whatever political leviathan dominated the future, be it Fascism or Communism. Some bishops and cardinals favored one extreme, some the other. The means were less important to the Church than the end, that being the reinforcement and enhancement of its perfidious mental and social control, this time under a carefully crafted benign mask. Mistakes of the past had been well and truly learned, and were not going to be repeated. The "New World Order" a la Vatican was to be exactly that - a new order for a new world.

LEFT: Pope John XXIII was born Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli. Another "People's Pope," he replaced Pius XII after his death in 1958. He was an ardent left-wing or Red Papist who overturned many of his predecessor's policies and actively strengthened the Vatican-Moscow alliance. He was even favored as pope by Stalin himself, as well as by other Marxist leaders throughout the world. His opposition to Pius XII made him a favorite of the Kremlin. His election as pope came as a major blow to right-wing Papists. It meant that millions of Catholics throughout the world could now vote for Communist politicians without threat of excommunication and disgrace. Those extra votes were coveted by the leading left-wing politicians in every country, who did whatever it took to guarantee winning them. Conservatives decided to move toward the left in order to win them. And so, from 1960 on, world politics changed in ways that had hitherto been impossible. RIGHT: Pope Paul VI was born Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonio Maria Montini. A close friend of John XXIII, he reigned as pope from 1963 to 1978. He went out of his ​way to fill the Sacred College with leftist cardinals. His overtly "progressive" outlook warned anti-Communist Papists of things to come. His main ally was the pro-Communist Cardinal Benelli.
From Baron Manhattan's revealing masterpiece The Vatican-Moscow-Washington Alliance, we learn that in the years following the Second World War the cardinals and priests of Roman Catholicism were split between those who favored the spread of Communism and those who strongly opposed it. On the whole the Jesuit Order was in favor of the spread of classic Bolshevik-style revolution, and played a major part in extreme leftist movements throughout the world, particularly in Latin America. They continue to be a force behind the spread of Socialism, but since the 1980s their tactics have changed somewhat, and they now tend to not be as extreme in their views and actions, at least not openly. The reasons for this are varied and interesting. In short, they were willing to give up their extremism for the right price, one that was eventually paid. However, before the Jesuits were brought to heel by the more powerful cadre of Red Papists, some of their head men, including the Black Pope himself, Pedro Aruppe, were openly or covertly assassinated. These "removals" sounded a warning that dissent over the new radical strategy was not going to be tolerated.
...the Jesuits totally ignored the warnings from Pope John Paul II to cease their subversive activities because of their determination to pursue the policies of the old Vatican-Moscow alliance with its advocacy of direct revolutionary involvement. When finally president Reagan, and behind him the Pentagon, insisted that the Church should control the Jesuits or else, the presidential warning produced a papal hurricane against the Jesuits - Baron Avro Manhattan

The Jesuits' pursuance of the discarded policies of the former Vatican-Moscow alliance and their defiance against the new policies of the Vatican-Washington alliance brought the anger of Pope John Paul II upon their heads in a manner they had not experienced for centuries...Their General was dismissed and openly scolded, indeed "publicly humiliated" by the Pope - ibid

The Jesuits were ordered to change their tactics. They coined slogans more appropriate to the "present conditions;" the words "radical" and "revolution" with such euphemisms as "profound renewals" or "innovating changes," or "social renovation" - ibid
A great deal of the Red Papacy's vast wealth comes from Jesuit-controlled Latin America. The natural resources of Latin American countries was not efficiently exploited until sophisticated machinery was imported in the 1940s. After this point the Vatican's wealth soared. Their power strengthened again, power lost to them after the collapse of the arch-Catholic Austro-Hungarian Empire, and loss of Mexico under Emperor Maximilian. By way of their newly acquired wealth the Latin American Jesuits were able to insinuate agents into the League of Nations and United Nations which succeeded it, thereby changing the course of world events to suit their own agendas. It is thanks to Latin America's industry that the Red Papacy has been able to rise to power, insinuate its agents into the U. S. Government, manipulate world administrations, and regain control of the world. The Red Papacy are the absolute over-arching architects of control and geopolitical puppet-masters. Whatever events transpire on the sociopolitical stage must be analyzed with this fact firmly in mind.

LEFT: Pope John Paul II replaced John Paul I after his assassination by agents of the Vatican-White House alliance. He reigned as pope from 1978 to 2005. RIGHT: The Black Pope and head Jesuit Pedro Arrupe was assassinated in 1991 by order of John Paul II and his confederates in the US government. He and his Jesuits had become something of an embarrassment to the new Red Papists who shied away from appearing extreme leftists. The hardline Socialism of the Jesuits suited the poor and downtrodden, particularly in countries south of the equator. It was not as suitable for the middle and upper-middle classes of north-western climes. This is why the Jesuits were eventually compelled to fall in line with the intrigues of the Red Papacy. Those who refused were removed and replaced.
Baron Manhattan points out that both John Paul I and John Paul II were glove-puppets of the opposing factions whose long fight for dominance finally came to a head in 70s and 80s. In revenge for the killing of John Paul I, after only thirty three days in office, the hardliner Communist faction of cardinals and bishops attempted to have John Paul II shot to death. This event occurred on May 13, 1981, right in St. Peter's Square.

John Paul II was shot four times by the Turkish patriot Mehmet Ali Agca, who was caught and jailed. He was subsequently pardoned by the Italian President and forgiven by the pope. John Paul trained to be an actor and was far more interested in acting than being pope. He had been turned down for ecclesiastical posts by seniors who knew his heart wasn't in the job. It was primarily because of the influence of his secret adviser Bishop Deskur that he finally rose to occupy the chair of St. Peter. He was profoundly arrogant and narcissistic and coveted the limelight. His hidden masters had him travel far and wide, gaining worldwide media attention. It was all part of the plan. John Paul II's brand of Socialism was a modification of that preferred by his predecessor John XXIII, but the headquarters of the new ideology was to be centered in Vatican City not Moscow. This was the first step to insinuate Vatican-approved Shadow Communism ​into the west. It found countless adherents in the world's governments, and its proponents are responsible for most of what we see taking place in the socio-political world.
Baron Manhattan reveals that the leftist members of the Curia (or Roman Circle) wanted to manufacture a brand of Marxist-Socialism all their own, in case Bolshevism ever overstepped itself, crumbled, or was destroyed by its enemies. Their alliances with Soviet Russia and other Communist countries - initiated after the First World War and Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 - were expedient means to this end. But it was not their intention to continue propounding perfidious Bolshevik Communism. It provided a rough template that needed lots of improvement and upgrading for the modern age by much more intelligent and cunning minds. The decision to design a new improved version of Socialism was made for purely pragmatic reasons. It was all about longevity and survival. Baron Manhattan stresses that the allegiances and machinations of the opposing factions within the Vatican, were always selfish, and never about the good of humanity. From their new high-horse the Red Papists could, not only in the name of Christ, but of Socialism, cajole the various decadent western governments over their faustian policies and actions, all the while looking good in the eyes of moderates and liberals everywhere. What a make-over they achieved for themselves, which after centuries of heinous crimes and debauchery was sorely needed.
…the Catholic Church, consumed by Cimmerian dreams of formidable expansion, is biding her time to enforce her dominion upon the human race. Not only as a spiritual, but also as a political power, buttressed by the unshakable conviction that it is her destiny to conquer the planet - Baron Avro Manhattan (Catholic Imperialism and World Freedom)

Her opposition to world revolution is not caused by her wish to save the freedom of the world, but by her wish to continue her old fight against the freedom of the world - ibid
This change of strategy by the Vatican did not mean the patriarchs of that city state were giving up their ecclesiastical status. It did not mean the Pope was becoming less authoritarian or megalomaniacal. His predecessors had made it clear time and again that all human beings on the planet, as well as all kings and emperors, were merely underlings, and that each and every person's soul could be saved only if they were unquestionably prostrate before the Chair of St. Peter and the regent sitting on it:
The Popes have received sovereignty not only Pontifical but royal, and the Empire not only of heaven but of Earth...Outside the Church there is no building save Hell, and there exists no power ordained by God - Pope Innocent IV

The Roman Pontiff, constituted by God, above Kings and Kingdoms, is the supreme hierarch of the Church militant, and has obtained principality over all mortal men - (From De Romano Pontifice)

We declare, define, establish and decree that every human creature, under the rigid necessity of saving his soul, must be subject to the Roman Pontiff - Pope Boniface VIII
Of course not too many people suspect that such an alliance was contemplated and executed by the Holy See, since obviously Communism professes atheism. But this is just what occurred. Economically and politically atheism was not a matter that phased the Red Papists. And after all, the Soviets had cultivated good working relations with the Orthodox Church. The same went for other Communist countries in Eastern Europe, where Communism and Christianity coexisted and cooperated. No, what mattered most was political rather than theological survival, and since it was apparent to the Holy See that Socialism of some kind was bound to win the world, the cunning bishops and cardinals had to choose sides while they still had the chance. Baron Manhattan shows that this had been the policy of the Church for centuries. But in the early twentieth century the situation was so urgent that even if an antagonistic pope or two had to be removed and sacrificed, it simply had to be done. Certainly Karl Marx had described religion as the "opium of the people." But what of it? The cardinals knew this fact centuries before Communism was invented. Moreover, Lenin was less obsessive. He threw the Church a bone when he publicly said that religion was a private affair.

It was the cue the Red Papists or Shadow Communists had been waiting for. It was an opportunity not to be missed. The game was now on, and the Red Papists put their plan for restoration into operation. Until the rise of Fascism in Italy and Germany they had things their own way. As we said the Jesuits even went so far as to take up extreme left-wing positions in countries they were subverting. This position gave them the clout they needed to withstand opposition from Russia and particularly from western powers. It gave them the ideological arsenal they needed to not only supervise and counter western powers, but eventually to morally and politically undermine them.
By adopting a Catholicized Marxism, the Catholic Church has launched into the contemporary world the most insidiously destructive religio-ideological imponderable the like of which has never been seen since the emergence of either Bolshevism or Fascism. Its contribution to the near future will be not only the destabilization of the balance of power between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, but equally the mounting exacerbation of the conflict - Baron Avro Manhattan

Pope John Paul II couldn't stay out of the headlines. His masters had him align himself with the leftist Solidarity workers movement of his native Poland, in order to make him popular to ordinary liberal-minded folks indoctrinated into thinking of him as a genuinely caring people's champion, seeking redress and justice for all. The ruse worked a like a charm.
The idea was to become better advocates of Marxist-Socialism than the cruel extremist Bolsheviks. Socialism was the way forward, even if it was reluctantly endorsed and backed by ostensibly liberal politicians and interests in Britain and America. Most western Capitalists hated and feared the Bolshevik variety of hard Communism, but were not so concerned and threatened by the new improved brand concocted by the Red Papists of Vatican City.

The fact that Socialism is patently atheistic didn't disturb the love fest. It was a sticking point best not brought to the table. Why disturb the Realpolitik?

So the decision to back hard Communism was never wholehearted on the part of the Red Papacy. It was favored only by the Jesuits who would be forced to go along with the new policy, come what may. It would not be an easy task because opposition to the plan, from Pius XII and other ardent right-wingers was relentless. But we cannot understand the present sociopolitical world until we grasp the significance of this rivalry. It accounts for almost every major political decision made since the death of John Paul I. It also helps us to determine the true nature of the allegiances and views expressed by this or that public figure. When we listen to statements made by Father Coughlin, Henry Ford, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, John F. Kennedy, George Bush, Zbigniew Brzezinski, George Soros, Bill Clinton, Donald Rumsfeld, Bob Geldof, Bono, Russell Brand, Nelson Mandela, Fidel Castro, Lech Walesa, Newt Gingrich, Pat Buchanan, Pat Robertson, Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair or Prince Charles, how do we correctly analyze what is being said and implied? Are their comments good for humanity in general, or will they lead to disaster?


Who's telling the truth? What should we believe?
What's it all about? Is that an insider-smile?
Perhaps the Red Papists saw the future, and concluded that the hard variety of Socialism purveyed by the Bolsheviks had little hope of continuing. It had too many powerful enemies and was rotten from within. After all, feuds raged between Communist enclaves throughout Europe and the world. There were incendiary disagreements between the Soviets and Fidel Castro in Cuba, Marshall Tito in Yugoslavia, Mao in China, and so on. There was also the fact that the Catholics weren't too hot on the Jewish presence within Bolshevism. The members of the Vatican gang didn't want to be outdone and out-numbered by a gang of super-wealthy Jews who had sacked the many nations under their ruthless dominion. The Jewish-Communists had vast armies at their disposal, while the Vatican had none to speak of. Jews had prospered enormously by crushing Russia and other lands under the name of Communism, and were becoming the primary, if hidden, power in many key fields throughout the world. The Red Papists also understood that because of the spread of Bolshevik-style Communism, their very existence was threatened. In ten or twenty years, after most young adults had been indoctrinated by Communist ideology, religion of every variety, especially that disseminated from Rome, was likely to be dismissed as reactionary, irrelevant and dispensable. Eventually there might even be a more radical expression of dissent from within the ranks. All over the world young priests (and Jesuits) were already ardently espousing left-wing beliefs and views. What if they turned from religion completely? What if they bit the hand that fed them? Yes, it was too worrying and precarious. Something had to be done to prevent disaster.
A mere 69 days into his presidency, Ronald Reagan was nearly shot ​to death in Washington DC. The date was May 30, 1981. The would-be assassin was John Hinckley. He was caught and sentenced to life in prison. Who masterminded the plot? Was it the Red Papists, attempting to turn foil the alliance of right-wingers in the Vatican and Washington? Or was it a warning to the American president to toe the line of his Red Papist masters, and continue working with their agent John Paul II? Was he being told "step out of line just once, and you'll be replaced by a more loyal deputy?"
Although the policies and agenda of the Red Papists had been resisted by Pius XII, things took a turn for the worse as time went by. A direct phone line was installed in the White House, so Ronald Reagan could converse regularly with Pope John Paul II, after his inauguration. In other words, the game was afoot. The old brand of Bolshevik Communism was rejected, and the new brand of Shadow Communism accepted and promoted. The right-wing image adopted by Ronald Reagan served as perfect camouflage for the rise to power of the Red Papacy.

Baron Manhattan informs us of a previous setback for the extremist faction within the Vatican. After the rise of Mussolini and Hitler in Italy and Germany, pro-Communist Papists were forced underground. To their horror a pact was signed between Hitler and Pope Pius XI, known as the Lateran Treaty. For a while, for followers of Pius XII, it looked as if all was right with the world. Indeed, without the Catholic vote Hitler would never have been able to come to power, despite the fact that Germany is traditionally a Protestant country. What does this tell us about other lands such as Vietnam, China, Japan, Korea, India, Africa, and so on, where, as Baron Manhattan assures us, the hidden hand of the Vatican is at work?
The US shouldn't worry about the Soviets in Latin America, because they are no longer revolutionaries. They should worry about the Catholic revolutionaries, who are - Fidel Castro

The Vatican, convinced that Africa will become a Marxist or Marxist-dominated continent, where the white presence will be eliminated and with it the religion preached by white missionaries, is creating an all-black hierarchy and clergy, chosen chiefly because of their "progressive" ideas - Baron Avro Manhattan
In 1929, Pius XI and Benito Mussolini (Fascist dictator of Italy) signed the Lateran Treaty. The pro-Fascist cabal at the Vatican gained a temporary victory over the pro-Communist Papists, at least until the end of the war. After signing, Mussolini restored to the Church many previously rescinded rights, as well as the Papal States and other properties previously seized in 1867 by the Italian crown. He awarded the Vatican and its agents complete political and legal neutrality. All in all it was a great day for the Vatican. Pius XI's subsequent retraction and denunciation of the Nazis and the treaty was a major setback for Pius XII and other opponents of Communism who formulated and backed the Lateran Treaty. Before he could issue his denunciation of Fascism to the world, Pius XI was covertly murdered, probably by order of Pius XII who succeeded him ​as pope.

Mussolini's heinous act showed humanity that Fascism can be as dangerous as Communism. Publicly supplying additional powers to the Papacy would be the last thing on the mind of anyone truly concerned with the physical and spiritual welfare of the human race.

LEFT: President Richard Nixon. RIGHT: President Ronald Reagan. Like George Bush and other presidents before them, they took their instructions from representatives of the Vatican. Nixon, Bush and Reagan worked with the CIA and the Vatican to smuggle Nazis and Croatian fascist (Ustasi) killers to safety in America, Britain and South America. This was at the behest of the Papacy, the expert manipulators of the world stage, playing right against left, Nazi against Communist, rich against poor, for their own sinister empowerment. The three American presidents, along with their CIA co-conspirators, were ordered to destroy records that recorded secret deals between the Papacy and the fascists of Germany and Croatia. Also suppressed was the evidence showing that a great bulk of the Nazi loot had been transferred to the Vatican from Switzerland at the close of World War II. Although done in the name of anti-Communism, we see that the Red Papists weren't truly adverse to Communism. That was just the expedient stance which enabled their vile deeds against humanity to receive the stamp of approval from authentic anti-Communist leaders. The Papacy dons whatever hat suits the occasion. In this way their agents are warmly received by courts and governments of every political extreme. The complete legal immunity enjoyed by envoys, priests, bishops and cardinals, allows them to move sensitive documents, cash, gold and jewels to all corners of the globe without search or suspicion. Thus, the Vatican's spy network is second to none. As Baron Manhattan shows, it is this sovereign unaccountable leviathan that directs world events and decides which of their loyal deputies finds himself elected to political power.

Nixon's speeches were ghostwritten by the Jesuit Reverend John McLaughlin. Reagan spoke regularly by phone with his bosom buddy Pope John Paul II, who shamelessly backed extremist Catholic mass murderers in Croatia, South America and elsewhere. The Red Papists were intent on ingratiating themselves with western demagogues and frequently looked the other way when atrocities were committed by the latter. In some cases, they even endorsed acts of war and terror perpetrated by western governments. More disastrously, they saw to it that men under their control assumed top positions in major western political institutions, security orgs and financial corporations. Baron Manhattan shows the extent of the Vatican's financial wealth and global power in his masterpiece Vatican Billions. In the run up to his election, Ronald Reagan told the American people that if he was elected he was going to fight for families " the spirit of John Paul II." He said "...I reaffirm to you my pledge, in the spirit of Pope John Paul II, that I will do all I can to see that common good is once more ​the true goal of decision making." Without the votes of America's Catholics, Reagan had no chance of becoming president. He was the Vatican's man, like so many before and after him. By 1984, the Vatican-Washington alliance was signed, sealed and delivered by all concerned.
Pius XI eventually recanted his allegiance with the Nazis. Although he did not become openly Communist, he decided he had been wrong to think of the Nazi alliance as being better for Vatican interests. Then, as the Axis powers faced defeat, Pius XI and others did an about-face and aligned themselves with Britain and America. This was of course a disaster for the hardliner pro-Communist Papists who fought to regain their power in the years that followed. They rose to power again openly in 1976 when the Italian Communist Party dominated the nation's political scene. The Party was strongly supported and directed behind the scenes by Pope John VI. Due to his machinations, the Italian government was infested with hardliner Communists. Rome's mayor at the time, Giulio Argan, was a avowed Marxist. Moscow was delighted. As Baron Manhattan said, Rome and the Eternal City had become bastions of Communism.

LEFT: Roberto Calvi was an Italian banker found hanging under Blackfriar's Bridge in London. The year was 1982. Officially his murder has never been satisfactorily explained. The murder and the meltdown of his bank (Banco de Ambrosiano) occurred because he and his Masonic overlord, the notorious Licio Gelli (RIGHT), attempted to rip off millions of dollars to set themselves up. Their embezzlement and fraud was probably a response to the rise of the Red Papacy. Calvi, Gelli, and ​their associates in the right-wing Freemasonic P2 lodges of Italy, were incensed by the changes they saw happening in Rome and throughout the rest of the country. Realizing that things were only to get worse for their kind, Calvi and Gelli planned their exit strategy, which soon backfired.

Although this criminal act involved Catholic right-wingers, the Vatican itself was involved in a far worse case of financial chicanery and criminality. According to informed researchers, the Vatican was undoubtedly the destination of the bulk of the Nazi billions stashed away in Swiss banks which had to be moved once the Allies approached Germany toward the end of World War II. Some of the wealth was transported to Belgian banks (a country dominated by the Catholic branch of the "Black Nobility"), while the bulk crossed over into Italy. One of the main architects of this treasonous act was Allen Dulles, director of the CIA. (Here for more on the infamous Dulles-Vatican conspiracy...)
Pius XII backed the Nazis and Italian Fascists to ensure the Vatican's survival in an age of secularism, revolution and agnosticism. He also supported the Nazis because he genuinely believed Hitler would attack Soviet Russia and wipe the abomination of Communism from the face of the earth. This was one of the main reasons why right-wing Papists formulated the Lateran Treaty. We can only wonder what would have happened had Hitler's Operation Barbarossa been successful. Communism, Jesuitism and Red Papism might have bothered the world no more. There might never have been a decades long Cold War, and many lands in the Far East would not have been in a position to threaten the west.
LEFT: Adolf Hitler as "Man of the Year" on the front cover of America's Time Magazine, owned by Henry Luce, a Knight of Malta.

Adolf Hitler did not save and strengthen Germany. On the contrary, he destroyed it. He was a British and Red Papist agent from day one. His job was to remove legitimate right-wing forces that were arising to destroy Communism within Germany and elsewhere. His mission was the complete destruction of Germany; a process that had been in the works from before the Franco-Prussian and First World Wars. This is why the Nazi experiment failed as it was meant to fail. It accounts for the flagrant misrepresentation of the term "Aryan," and for the promotion of Ariosophy. It accounts for the millions of deutche marks that mysteriously awaited Hitler in Berlin, his conspicuously shortened prison sentence and popularity of his book Mein Kampf. It accounts for why the word Socialist appears in the Nazi party's title, and why Hitler attended the funeral of leading revolutionary Jewish-Communist Kurt Eisner. It explains the heinous "Night of the Long Knives," and presence within the Nazi Party of British agents such as Hjalmar Schacht, Karl Haushofer, Admiral Canaris, and others. It accounts for the marginalization, removal and covert murder of true Germans such as Erich von Ludedorff, Field Marshall Erwin Rommel, and others, and the otherwise inexplicable coldness toward Sir Oswald Mosley, the British Fascist leader. It accounts for the infamous Hitler-Stalin Pact, the disastrous Operation Barbarossa, and failure to deal the deathblow to Allied forces at Dunkirk. It accounts for the leniency toward wealthy Jews after Hitler's initial rise to power, the Haavara Agreement, and leniency towards Jewish Freemasonic lodges, while age-old Germanic lodges were closed. It explains the importation of thousands of German Communists previously stationed in Russia as part of the Hitler-Stalin pact. It accounts for Rudolf Hess's secret flight to England and for the close ties between the Nazis and American and British bankers. It also accounts for the planned and expected seizure of East Germany and many other neighboring countries by Communists at the war's end, and for the decades long Cold War. Most importantly, it accounts for the destruction, by way of planned mass ritual murder, of the best Anglo-Saxon blood - British and German.

It is no mere coincidence that the last two German Chancellors prior to Hitler's assumption of power were Catholics...and the intimate friends of the Papal Nuncio. It is also no mere coincidence that both strove to rule with Hitler, indeed, not only did they invite him to share their Governments, but it was chiefly thanks to them that Hitler was finally asked to form a Government...At the head of the new Germany, and second only to Hitler, there stood the German Vice-Chancellor, the Leader of the Catholic Party, the personal friend of Pacelli (Pius XII), the Papal Knight Franz von Papen - Avro Manhattan (Catholic Imperialism)

Adolf Hitler was a Catholic. Acting as leader of the German state, he signed a concordant with the Vatican in 1934 in which it was agreed that he would restore Church privilege and protect Church assets in Germany in return for Roman Catholic political endorsement and support - Richard Kelly Hoskins (In the Beginning)

No wonder that, after the end of the war, the man placed in charge of taxing Germany's Protestant landowners of their wealth (to pay war trumped-up war debts) was Catholic finance minister Matthias Erzberger. No wonder that after the war years, the great General Erich von Ludendorff openly stated that Germany's fall and ruin was undoubtedly due to the intrigues of Masons, Jews and Jesuits.
The hardliners took a certain amount of consolation when, at the end of the war, the Soviets overran numerous devastated European countries, setting up their oppressive draconian Eastern bloc. The Soviets maintained a large force of armed men for years after the end of the war, and spending billions they managed to seize Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany, Bulgaria, Romania, Yugoslavia, as well as Cuba, Angola, China, North Korea and North Vietnam. Hardliners and Red Papists alike breathed sighs of relief. Their agents were able to move about unrestricted by the Communist leaders of these plundered lands, even though there were severe reprisals against right-wing priests and clerics. Baron Manhattan was one of the few historians to monitor these crimes and publish accounts of them in his outstanding books.

Because of the fast, furious and largely unhindered spread of Communism throughout the world, after the Second World War, the pro-Communist factions within the Church, and Jesuit Order, went over the top in their support of Communistic policies and causes. It was not a clever move because it only helped identify them to their enemies in the US and elsewhere. At some point the Vatican realized that the Bolshevik form of Communism, propagated in so many conquered lands, was irredeemably corrupt and unsustainable. Ultimately, the future of humanity was not hard to predict for men of this caliber. The image of the Vatican was tarnished because of Catholicism's close links with ruthless Communist regimes. The extremist orientation had to be downplayed if people were to continue trusting the Church. And so moderate cardinals were able to put their long-term schemes to work. The alliance between the Vatican and the White House was made top priority, and sealed during the reign of John Paul II. Pius XII rolled and groaned in his grave.
The Berlin Wall is torn down. The year was 1989. What led to this remarkable moment in history, the sudden fall of Communism throughout Europe? Was it a spontaneous and legitimate people's revolution, or was it due to long laid plans finally being triggered by exceptionally powerful hidden forces? More importantly, did it signal the death throes of Communism? Sadly, the answer is no. The fall of the Berlin Wall and disintegration of Bolshevik-style Communism didn't mean the end of Socialism. Far from it. The Red Papists simply reoriented themselves and designed a new improved brand of Communism customized to suit the times. All that matters to them is survival, and an occasional shift to the hard left or right is regarded merely as an occupational hazard. The wolf in sheep's clothing remains as ravenous and devious as ever.
The pact between the Shadow Communists or Red Papists and the US Government, led to the disintegration of the Communist Eastern bloc, and eventually to the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Pius XII died in 1958, which means he did not live to see the fall of the original perfidious form of Communism and rise of the new stronger and more insidious popular form of Papist-approved Socialism that would succeed where the former had not.
In light of this, it is not difficult to understand why the policies of John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II, were originally resented and resisted by most Jesuits. The latter were far more extreme in their revolutionary zeal, and did not see the fall of the Eastern bloc as a good and necessary thing. As far as they were concerned their existence and relevance depended on the continuation of the Cold War. Their brand of Marxist-Catholicism had won them enviable power, and they were not ecstatic about having to give it up or tolerate popes who demanded a less conspicuous approach to world politics. It was with some difficulty that the Red Papists brought the Jesuits to heel. The Jesuits did not wish to breed a spirit of reconciliation between Capitalist and underprivileged and third-world countries. The had garnered considerable allegiance from the masses of underprivileged lands because of this stark opposition. To engender a moderate political climate meant undermining their significance and strength. After all, world events were going their way. In the 1950s Capitalist America had been engaged in the Korean War, and in the 60s it was involved in the unpopular Vietnam War. Both conflicts aroused great hostility not only in people of a left-wing persuasion but in moderates as well. As far as the Jesuits were concerned the rise of anti-Americanism on so many fronts was manna from heaven. Capitalism was being dealt blow after blow, and might in the end fall never to rise again. The end was in sight, so why deflect it with unnecessarily friendly overtures toward the decadent US? The Jesuits saw their hold over Catholic Latin American tightening because of this spreading anti-Americanism, and there was no way they were about to sacrifice that control. If their control had to be lessened or relinquished, the price had to be right. And, as the years passed, that is just what happened. To instigate Communism, a la Red Papacy, the Jesuits have had to release their control over Latin America and align with Washington, the White House seeing to it that their Red Papist confederates are given a greater say in world affairs. Ironically they have done so without a completely clear picture of what the future is to look like with these cunning allies in the driving seat.

Eventually the Jesuits (directed by the Red Papacy) installed their double-agent, Cardinal Francis Spellman, right in the center of the action, directing presidents Kennedy and Nixon toward greater and greater mishaps and human-rights violations. As far as the Jesuits were concerned, if Catholicism was to make headway in the Far East, in countries such as China, Vietnam, Malaysia and India, the West had to be perpetually demonized, something the Jesuit Order excelled at doing. In Vietnam, chaos reigned over the installation of the US-backed dictator President Diem. After his assassination, the Communists nearly took hold of South Vietnam, and Communism was certainly strengthened in North Vietnam as the war fury in the region escalated. President Diem was murdered at the behest of the CIA and the ambassador to South Vietnam, Averell Harriman, who as a senior Skull and Bones man, took his orders directly from Cardinal Spellman.
"Hey, it's a tough job running a massive country like America. We're not very good at it. I know, we'll step aside and ask you what we must do."

ABOVE: The head Jesuit and Black Pope, Cardinal Francis Spellman, with gangster-presidents John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. He was the brain behind the Vietnam War, which was known as "Spelly's War." He was the best spy money could buy. Posing as an ardent right-winger - with a hatred of Communists - he, along with Allen Dulles and other cronies, worked to bring destruction to America. American politics continues to be supervised and directed by advisers from Georgetown University, Fordham University, Boston College, and other Jesuit-controlled institutions such as the Council on Foreign Relations. The Jesuits eventually fell in line with the Red Papists, realizing that phase one of their master-plan had succeeded, and that a new more moderate tactic was indeed required, if the subversion ​of western Capitalism was to successfully continue.

The first feelings of goodwill toward new Vatican relations began during World War I. When it appeared that the Allies would emerge as victors, the Vatican began passive cooperation with the US, as a useful intelligence transmitter...At the height of the European crisis, President Roosevelt surreptitiously bypassed the 1867 ban by sending a "personal representative" to the Vatican on the grounds that it gave America "a good listening post"...On October 1951, President Truman, eager to enlist the growing Catholic vote, stunned even his own party, along with the rest of the US, only hours before the recess of the Senate, by announcing the nomination of a US ambassador to the Vatican...Early in 1984, the US established full diplomatic relations with the Vatican, ending 116 years of diplomatic vacuum. The step took America by surprise...The process began during the Cold War after World War II, when minor and major nations started to woo the Holy See. It continued after the Vatican-Moscow alliance which followed. Countries which preceded the US move included Finland and Denmark in 1982, and Sweden in 1983. Even England, after four and a half centuries, reestablished diplomatic ties with the Vatican in 1982. In less than two decades, the Vatican had been recognized as a predominant diplomatic center by more than 120 nations...

...When the US was born, the pope was king of a large territory in central Italy known as the Papal States. Yet the US government totally ignored the Vatican both as a state and even more as a church. In 1797, the young American nation commissioned an Italian citizen, B. Sartori, to represent her interests in the Vatican. Fifty years later, President Polk, owing to increased problems with the Papal States, opened diplomatic relations with the Vatican. Resentment in the US began to build immediately and soon the forced closing of a Presbyterian church in Rome caused Congress to end the relations. Finally, in 1867, at the instance of the New York Times, a law ​was passed forbidding any government funding for a Vatican ambassador. Three years later the Papal States disappeared when they were forcibly annexed by a reunited Kingdom of Italy which made Rome its official Capital. This ended the secular status of the pope as head of state. Subsequent attempts to reestablish diplomatic relations failed mostly because of active resistance of the Protestant establishment - Baron Avro Manhattan
Spellman's supposed right-wing stance, and opposition toward the spread of Communism in the Far East, worked to soften the attitude of the White House toward the Jesuit presence in Latin America. It bought the Jesuits time to align themselves with the Red Papacy, without losing their considerable power in Latin America, power that had been established over centuries and might have been gradually lost to Protestant America if relations between the North and South improved diplomatically and commercially. This had been the Jesuit's fear from the drafting of the Monroe Doctrine in 1823, and slow southward territorial acquisition of the North Americans. At the outbreak of the First World War, the Jesuits were horrified when numerous Latin American countries sided with North America and broke ties with Germany. They saw their control waning considerably and knew something had to be done. To maintain a stringent left-wing stance would certainly lead to a catastrophe for them once the war came to an end when North America's economic power would be vaster than it had been from its inception as a nation.

Another reason why the Jesuits were loathe to distance themselves from the Soviets had to do with their excellent intelligence gathering operations. They were able to combine their age-old capacity for espionage with the comparably formidable secret worldwide spy networks established by Stalin and previous Soviet leaders. This apparatus was an asset that would not be easily and willingly sacrificed.

LEFT: Harold Laski. RIGHT: The psychopathic Stalinist V. K. Krishna Menon was promoted by Prime Minister Nehru to India's Minister of Defense. So much for the neutrality of India after achieving its so-called "independence" in 1947. Officially a pacifist, Menon promptly armed India to the teeth, and pushed for tight diplomatic relations with Soviet Russia. But where did Nehru find Menon? In London's School of Economics. Menon was trained by the notorious Fabian Harold Laski. His Marxist views influenced most of Britain's leftist politicians from the 1930s on. Laski served as Chairman of the British Labor Party from 1945 to 1946, and was the most eminent political intellectual in Britain for some time. The first president of a "free" India, Nehru, was an admirer of Laski, which is why he sought out and hired Menon. Laski was a executive member of the Fabian Party for over ten years, and was closely associated with the Frankfurt School. He made certain that the leftist political-scientist Franz Leopold Neumann was promoted. The Jewish Neumann played a key role in the Nuremberg Trials, supervising and amending the prosecution cases against Nazi defendants such as Alfred Rosenberg and Hermann Goering, etc. Neumann was a senior member of the Rockefeller Foundation. After his death, Neumann's wife married arch Neo-Marxist Herbert Marcuse, Laski's closest friend. Through these overtly Marxist thinkers, the Shadow Communist plan for world domination was invented and facilitated. That these men were often avowed atheists did not stop them creating an alliance with the Red Papacy. The Shadow Communists are careful to conceal their presence and true agenda from the public. This is one reason they've been so successful. Indeed, since the end of the Second World War, almost every teacher and professor in Indian schools, colleges and universities has been a card-carrying Marxist. This remains the case today.
As we said above, the Pro-Communists, Red Papists and Jesuits were not keen on losing world control to Jews and Zionists. Most Bolsheviks were Jewish, but unlike Zionists they were not Capitalists, so there was no problem dealing with them. The problem was with ardent-Zionists pushing for a separate homeland in Palestine, and with their sympathizers in the Jewish and Gentile worlds. As far as the Jesuits were concerned, Zionism had to be kept at bay. It was another branch of Capitalism and neither Zionism nor Israel could exist without vast sums from Capitalist countries. What is more, Zionists lured Jews to Israel from Russia and other European countries, turning them from moderates into right-wingers, and often turning them from religion to atheism or alternatively to Jewish messianism. The religious Zionist wanted to win the world for Jehovah, not Christ. All in all, Jesuits are not impressed when any nation raises its people above a medieval level of intellectual and social development. It means losing control over their minds and political leanings, and in the case of Zionism it means that pro-Zionist Jews are far less approving of Rome's neo-Marxist ideology.

Some extremists within Soviet Russia and other Communist countries realized Rome's predicament and sought to strengthen Zionism for their own purposes. During Stalin's reign, the Soviets attempted to downplay the Jewish role in Communism, and as a result they supported Jewish immigration to Israel. Other countries followed suit, simply to be rid of their own Jewish populations. The Jesuits could only look on in horror. The rise of Israel was a major hitch in their plans for the future of the world. From the 1950s on, they've had to work harder to recruit Jewish intellectuals and activists to their dastardly cause. The only good to come out of it, was that Jesuit agents were able henceforth to blame Zionists for any and all conspiracies and upheavals that occur throughout the world, many of their (the Jesuits) making. The Catholic conspiratorial hand has been at work longer than the Zionist hand. (Here for more...)

Like Gentiles, Jews are split into contingents of rich and poor, privileged and humble. religious and atheistic. The privileged tend to lean toward right-wing politics, hence the rise of Zionism and Neo-Conservatism. With this in mind, we see that while left-wing Jews (the majority) cheered the Papacy's turn toward Socialism, right-wingers and Zionists (the minority of Jews) probably saw the change as problematic and even spurious. Conversely, the Jesuits were not thrilled by the rise of Zionism and Neo-Conservatism, which are essentially right-wing and Capitalistic. Indeed the Zionist state of Israel could simply not exist without enormous donations from the world's richest Jews and Gentiles. For those intent on fomenting world revolution (workers against the wealthy), Zionism and Neo-Conservatism were nothing but obscene impediments. Jesuits and Red Papists worried that the stronger Zionism became, and the more converts it won to its cause, the less chance they had of succeeding in their own geopolitical intrigues. Consequently the Jesuits and their Gentile agents started assiduously backing the Palestinian cause.

The Middle-East conflict has been needlessly prolonged because of the Jesuits and their covert opposition of Zionism. Ironically, some of the most powerful and wealthy Jews, such as the Rothschilds, were instrumental in the rise of the Red Papacy. Jewish dynasties are themselves divided over their allegiances. Some align with and finance Zionism, while others are in sympathy with the neo-Marxist Red Papacy. The fact is that all Jewish societies and aspirations survived to the present day because of the secret patronage of the Crown and the Cross. Judaism would long ago have been wiped from the face of the earth if the Crown and Holy See desired that end. The Red Papacy may not like the overt Capitalism of the average Zionist, but they have more to lose by actively denouncing Zionists, who are bound to retaliate (as well-meaning Protestants once did) by dragging the Vatican's crimes through their synagogues and headlines. This is certainly not in the Red Papacy's interest, and so a truce of sorts has been decided upon. To overtly cajole Zionists brings the Red Papacy into conflict with the White House which wholeheartedly supports Zionism and Israel. This, again, is not something desired by the Vatican whose diplomatic relations with America were cemented only recently. Moreover, throughout history the Jew has made a very useful scion and lieutenant. His survival depends upon his secret fealty to the Cross and/or Crown. This is the case for the Rothschilds (Knights of Malta and keepers of the Vatican's treasury), and many other plutocratic Hofjuden (Court Jews).

The Rothschilds were Jesuits who used their Jewish background as a facade to cover their sinister activities. The Jesuits, working through Rothschild and Biddle, sought to gain control of the banking system of the United States - Bill Hughes (The Secret Terrorists)

Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked them up in Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title “Guardians of the Vatican Treasury”…The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy absolute financial power and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? - F. Tupper Saussy (Rulers of Evil)

In other words, the world conspiracy was not devised and designed by Jews. Although Jews have no allegiance with any Gentile nation, and have been used as chess pieces in most Gentile plots for world domination, they have never risen above the power of the Atonist-Masonic "Black Lodge" or "Black Nobility." This elite group includes families within the College of Cardinals, who artfully promote and reward Jews (and others) for acting as scapegoats and fall-guys when and if the need arises, and being in history's headlines as the foremost political malefactors. Along with their close ally, British Intelligence, the Red Papacy are the architects of the never ending Israel-Palestine conflict. This conflict, like so many others in history, is funded by the world's wealthiest men, the world's wealthiest Socialists and Islamo-Communists, the world's deadliest present threat.

See my article Jews and Templars: The Untold Story, for more on the Jewish role in world conspiracy.
Of course the non-Marxist branch of the Vatican are not as concerned about the rise of Zionism, and have even used Israel as a tool to undermine their rivals among the neo-Marxist Papists. This accounts for the various pro-Zionist, pro-Israel movements and voices in both Protestant and Catholic churches. Baron Manhattan warned of the powerful combine forming between right-wing Catholics and Zionists. He suspected that it was partly because of this alliance that the Eastern bloc declined and fractured, already weakened by the policies and activities of the left-wing Red Papacy. Again, knowing about these two opposing factions within the Vatican - the right-wing and left-wing - helps us make sense of the comments and views of most front-page politicians and clerics. It helps us understand behind-the-scenes machinations happening in our times.
Are we to trust the apparent camaraderie between US Evangelists (John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Jan Van Impe and others) and political Zionism? Christianity and Capitalism are, after all, unthinkable without the Jews. Is it right to support Israel and Jewish claims about their right to land in Palestine? To whom do we turn to find the facts of the matter? Are we told the truth by the media about the Jewish-Palestinian conflict? Is the Red Papacy bound to condemn Zionism and the Israelis because the latter are ardent Capitalists rather than Islamo-Communists? What happens if the media deceives us about the alleged crimes of Jews against Moslems, and what if we've been deceived about the Jewish role in world conspiracy? Can extremist Christians be trusted on this or any other matter? Do Christians condemn Jews because they have secret alliances with rich Arabs? Do some Christians praise Jews so that the latter won't reveal the perfidy and chicanery of Christians? Do left-wing Jews really deserve to be respected as true Jews or do they use Judaism as a cover and means to an end? Do occult Jews wish to destroy both Judaism and Christianity? Were Zionist-Jews finally gifted Israel as a long awaited reward for services rendered as Hofjuden or Court Jews? Or has some unseen order infiltrated both left- and right-wing Jewish contingents, pitting one side against the other for their own sinister purposes? (Here for more...)

(Here and Here for more on subversive Christian groups)
Right-wing Catholics and Zionists are not able to work together permanently because of their theological differences. They may be antagonistic toward the same left-wing groups, but when it comes to religion, they are miles apart. The religious Zionist wants to win the world for Jehovah, while the Catholic wants to win it for Jesus. Of course, the Muslim wants to win the world for Allah. This is why alliances between these groups are doomed from the start, and can only be short-lived. Nothing will change until religion is itself rejected by each and every faction and cabal, and that is a day that will never come. As we see from history, the most dynamic and effective political leaders thrown up by Zionism and Papism tend to be the most theocratically zealous. To overcome this persistent problem and impasse, the Vatican has developed a policy of ecumenicalism. This direction is especially promoted by the Shadow Communists, who long ago realized that religious extremism hinders agreements and alliances not only with Communist countries, but other non-Jewish and non-Christian lands. Ecumenicalism is greeted warmly even by moderate Catholics, since it constitutes a weapon against Protestantism, the traditional enemy.


LEFT: The Pope kisses the Koran. Pope John Paul II, like other popes after him, flew to every corner of the globe, kissing and schmoozing with potentates of the world's religions. Pius XII was probably turning in his grave. No right-wing pope would have sanctioned ecumenicalism of this kind. The message from the Vatican is that "We may have become neo-Marxists, but we did so in the name of Christ. What's more, we aren't theologically exclusive any longer. We are all one big global family." Fabians and Jesuits everywhere were onboard and delighted. This move by the Red Papists was probably a response to the rise of Zionism as well as atheism. For Red Papists and Jesuits, right-wing Zionism is more to be feared than Soviet Communism. Ironically, the atheism of the latter is closer to the gospel espoused by Jesus than the Yahwistic Messianism and unashamed Capitalism of the former.
The Red Papacy's success is plainly seen in the rise of the United Nations and more recent European Union. The main architects of these multinational bodies were agents of the Vatican-Washington alliance. Instead of the restoration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, as envisioned by Pope Pius XII - and instead of worldwide Communism as envisioned by hardliner Bolsheviks - we got the United States of Europe and a Euro-Communism a la Red Papacy.
…the transition of a democratic West into a monolithic, Catholic-dominated red bloc, will imperil not only the national liberties of the European countries, but, equally, those of the United States - Baron Avro Manhattan

In 1949, about 40 senators and 105 representatives introduced the Atlantic Union Resolution which called for a convention to strengthen the UN and establish a world government...The Atlantic Union Committee included many CFR members, while Rockefeller provided rent free space for its headquarters - Gurudas (Treason: The New World Order)

The U.N. is the chosen instrument for ushering in the ultimate One World Government. It places itself above the U.S. Constitution in defiance of the U.S. Constitution - Dr. John Coleman (Obama's America)


Yes, it's a massive job running a country the size of America. It's even more difficult running the world. The colossal problem was soon solved by the creation of massive bureaucratic organizations such as the United Nations. As its twelve-starred emblem reveals, this leviathan and its commissars serve to implement the policies of the Red Papacy.

The multinational orgs that grew out of the Bretton Woods Agreement and Maastricht, Lisbon and Rome Treaties, were the brainchildren of Red Papists and their Jewish and Gentile agents. The existence and global policies of these orgs ensures that the overarching theological and political agendas of the Red Papacy cannot be contradicted and overturned by any other group. The shadowy commissioners behind the EU are almost exclusively Red Papists, with little love for Capitalism and the west. The Red Papacy learned how to manipulate and use multinational organizations for their own benefit after 1920, when the League of Nations was established. At first the Vatican was opposed to the organization, but when numerous Latin American countries flocked to join the League, and for the first time enjoyed political clout to change the course of world affairs, the Vatican had no choice but to change its spots and align with the League. From then on the Vatican, as well as the Jesuits, have made excellent use of the United Nations organization which succeeded the League of Nations. The various disposable politicians leading the Latin American countries, voting for this and that policy at the United Nations and other globalist leviathans, are merely glove-puppets controlled by unseen Red Papists whose diplomatic power has been vastly increased by way of intergovernmental organizations of this kind. The so-called "New World Order" agenda would not have taken hold as an idea or a reality without this largely secretive but highly efficient alliance between the Red Papacy, League of Nations, United Nations and EU. By way of this enhancement of power the Shadow Communists were finally able to insinuate their agents into the corridors of power in America, Britain and other countries throughout Europe and the world.


The Red Papacy, as an entity, is the result of the infiltration of Catholicism by agents of the Luciferian Knights Templar. The subversion was attempted more than once throughout history and finally succeeded in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. (For more on this subject, see my article Jews and Templars: The Untold Story.)

The Red Papacy exercises considerable power through orgs such as the Council on Foreign Relations. It has agents within numerous secret societies, such as Opus Dei, Knights of St. Patrick, Knights of Columbus, Skull and Bones Society and Bohemian Club, etc. Members and agents of these societies and orgs control the banks and corporate world, not to mention the many non-profit foundations and so-called "philanthropic" associations. It is Red Papacy agents in government who contrive these bizarre political liaisons between this or that head of state. It's all made for TV. Men who attempted to expose how secret societies work to subvert national sovereignty and direct national and global policies - such as Anthony Sutton, John Coleman, and others - have been forcibly silenced and ridiculed.
In America, as said, the many opportunist politicians and presidents are not elected by the public, but selected by the Red Papists. From their headquarters at Boston College and Georgetown University they direct those who appear to direct national and international affairs. They control the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Federal Reserve, US Supreme Court, and most other important and prestigious centers of learning, politics and business.

Recent presidents of the United States have been ardently left-wing. This is because they are selected by the Red Papists. Thanks to its many advocates and stooges, Shadow Communism a la Red Papacy moves full steam ahead. The Capitalist west is thoroughly crippled, and the final humiliation is soon to come, when the Far East sends its money and industry to prop-up a bankrupt America. The patriarchs of the Red Papacy have expertly eviscerated America on many levels, and via their Hofjuden agents in the Federal Reserve, they have succeeded in emptying America's coffers, dispossessing the people who have no idea what is happening, expertly distracted by never ending media spectacles and petty faux rivalries. Had America supported Germany against Britain during the First and Second World Wars, it would have been so inherently strong in the post-war years that the Red Papacy and its agents would never have been able to insinuate themselves, as they had done in South America, and would never have been in a position to subvert the country before it had time to develop beyond its infancy period.

…former Senator Danforth threatened the recalcitrant FBI director Louis Freeh with a search warrant. It is a pity that he did not get one. He might, in the process, have discovered a bit more about Freeh’s membership in Opus Dei (meaning God’s Work), a secretive international Roman Catholic order dedicated to getting its membership into high political, corporate, and religious offices…in various lands to various ends…Media-light was cast on the order when it was discovered that Robert Hanssen, an FBI agent, had been a Russian spy for twenty-two years but also that he and his director, Louis Freeh…“not only were both members of the same Roman Catholic church in suburban Virginia but…also belonged to the local chapter of Opus Dei” - Gore Vidal (Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace)

LEFT: Financier George Soros. RIGHT: Russian president Vladimir Putin. Both men are Vatican agents. Putin is the latest in a long line of key movers and shakers placed in charge of the Red Papacy's policy for world control. His version of Shadow Communism furthers the Red Papacy's desire for the obliteration of national soverignty, Capitalism, class and gender division. His agents are behind the conflicts that exist between Islam and the west, and between extremist groups on the left and right. Putin expertly directs faux White Supremacists, Muslim terrorists and sinister west-hating Chinese factions in their related schemes to undermine western economies, western security and western morale. Some researchers imagine Putin to be a Zionist stooge. In our mind, he and the billionaire Jews (Sabbateans) surrounding him are all efficient lieutenants of the Red Papacy (and Templars).
There exists not, upon the face of the earth, a better organized dictatorship, and which has maintained herself for so many centuries, than the Fascist political state of the Vatican. She has known how to use the name of Christianity astutely, and has willed to represent Christian values thus confusing and deceiving millions - Monsignor Rafael Rodriguez Guillen (Power of the Vatican)
The Red Papacy's designs on world control have been well and truly executed and fulfilled. Communism's first phase came and went. It provided a template that was, in the background, carefully and artfully improved and upgraded through the years after the Second World War and fall of Fascism. After the inauguration of Pope John Paul II, there was less need for secrecy, and the Red Papists or Shadow Communists became all the more brazen and confident. Their agents have been many, and include Tony Blair, Barack Obama, George Soros and Vladimir Putin, not to mention their many astute advisers, modern-day Svengalis like Mandell House, Harold Laski, Franz Neumann, Herbert Marcuse and Leo Pasvolsky of yesteryear.

Room has been made by the victors for other factions and cadres to exist and spar, such as Zionists, Muslim Brotherhood, Christian fundamentalists, Mormons, Anarchists, People's movements, Social Justice Warriors, or what have you. No problem there. One needs a little variety to spice things up, and if needs be to lead attention away from where you don't want it focusing. The clashes between these factions makes a great gladiator's arena spectacle. But despite the appearance of diversity there is barely a bona fide right-wing movement anywhere to be found. The last legitimate cleric to stand up against the Red Papacy was Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre of France. After his death in 1991, there has been little open resistance to the Shadow Communists of Vatican City. Most recent so-called right-wing movements are of the faux variety. The very term "right-wing" now serves mostly as a diatribe to stigmatize and ostracize any person or group with the temerity to challenge the Red Papacy and its many "progressive" agents.

Baron Avro Manhattan was the greatest exposer of the Vatican and its many agents and intrigues. We highly recommend his superlative works, Vatican Billions, The Vatican-Moscow-Washington Alliance, The Vatican in World Politics, Vatican Holocaust, Catholic Imperialism and World Freedom, The Dollar and the Vatican, Latin America and the Vatican, Murder in the Vatican, and Vietnam: Why Did We Go? (Here for more.


The Landgraves of Hesse-Kassel were famous for renting out their army to European Great Powers during the 17th and 18th centuries. It was a widespread practice at the time for small countries to rent out troops to larger countries in exchange for subsidies. International jurists drew a distinction between mercenaries and auxiliaries (Hilfstruppen). Mercenaries served in foreign armies as individuals, while auxiliaries were sent by their prince to the aid of another prince.[2] Hesse-Kassel took the practice to an extreme, maintaining 5.3% of its population under arms in 1730.[3] This was a higher proportion than even Prussia,[3] a country that was so heavily militarized that it was described as "not a country with an army, but an army with a country". The Hessian army served as a readily-available reserve for the Great Powers.[4] During the American War of Independence, 25% of the British army consisted of troops rented from German princes, half of whom came from Hesse-Kassel and nearby Hesse-Hanau. For this reason, Americans refer to all German troops serving with the British armies as "Hessians".[5] a form of synecdoche.



David Livingstone

The llluminati

The Shabbatean Frankists

A new order would be formed within Freemasonry, a secret society within a secret society,
founded by members of a Jewish family, the Rothschilds, who were affiliated with a
development of Lurianic Kabbalah


headed by false messiah known as Shabbetai Zevi. According to Gershom Scholem, the
foremost authority on the Kabbalah, the Shabbatean movement was "the largest and most
momentous messianic movement in Jewish History" since the destruction of Jerusalem. In
1666, Shabbetai Zevi, followed by his prophet, Nathan of Gaza, proclaiming himself the
promised Messiah of Judaism. Zevi succeeded in rallying a large following, involving
nearly half of the Jewish population of the world, including the Jews of Palestine, Egypt,
and Eastern and Western Europe. The movement was shattered however, when, forced
by the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire to choose martyrdom or conversion, Zevi chose
conversion to Islam.


Shabbetai Zevi

Nathan became a Roman Catholic, and the movement largely collapsed, though some
followed Zevi into conversion, and there is down to the present time an Islamic sect in
Turkey that follows his teachings, known as the "Doenmeh", who profess Islam only
outwardly, while adhering to a mixture of traditional and heretical Judaism in secret.f-^

The Shabbatean heresy, which until that time had survived in secret circles akin to
something of a Masonic organization, reemerged definitely through the Jewish sect of the
Frankists. f-^ They were also known as the Zoharists, or the Illuminated, or, in Podolia,
from where they originated, as Shabbatean Zevists, for their allegiance to the false
messiah of the preceding century. The leader of the Zoharists was Jacob Frank, originally
named Jacob Leibowicz, who regarded himself as a reincarnation of Zevi. Frank, who
rejected the Talmud in favour of the Zohar, maintained that certain elect individuals are


exempt from the moral law. The Shabbateans believed that in the Messianic age, the laws
of the Torah were no longer valid, and all that had been formerly prohibited was now
permitted, or even mandatory. This included all the prohibited sexual unions and
incest. Therefore, their practices, which included orgiastic, sexually promiscuous rites,

led the Jewish community to brand them as heretics.


Jacob Frank

Frank preached a "Religious Myth of Nihilism". Ultimately, Frank taught his followers that
the overthrow and destruction of society was the only thing that could save mankind.
Despite the fact that they were all outwardly religious, the Frankists sought "the
annihilation of every religion and positive system of belief," and they dreamed "of a
general revolution that would sweep away the past in a single stroke so that the
world might be rebuilt." Of the revolutionary philosophy of the Frankists, Gershom
Scholem wrote in Kabbalah and Its Symbolism: "for Frank, anarchic destruction
represented all the Luciferian radiance, all the positive tones and overtones, of the word

Jacob Frank promulgated his nihilistic religion as "the way to Esau" or "Edom".

According to Frank, all the great patriarchs had sought the way to God, but without
success. It was therefore necessary to find a new way, which leads to "true life", which
Esau or Edom symbolize as liberation, or man's nature unbridled by law. In order to
achieve this goal, it would be necessary to abolish all laws, but to be accomplished in
secret. As the "true believers" had already passed through Judaism and Islam, they ought
now also to assume the "religion of Edom", or Christianity, outwardly, using it to conceal
the real core of their belief of Jacob Frank as the true Messiah and the living God.

In 1759, members of the sect converted to Christianity, but nevertheless persisted in
heretical ways. As a result, the Inquisition imprisoned Frank in 1760. Freed by the
conquering Russians in 1773 though, he eventually settled in Offenbach, Germany,
dubbing himself baron. In the period between Frank's conversion to his death, the
community of his followers strengthened their position not only in Poland, but also in the
Austrian territories of Moravia and Bohemia. The movement became active in Masonic
organizations and began to combine revolutionary Kabbalistic ideas with the philosophical
ideals of the Enlightenment. Among Frank's followers, according to Scholem, some were
accepted into the administration and aristocracy of the Habsburgs, "but they preserved a
few Frankist traditions and customs, so that a stratum was created in which the boundaries
between Judaism and Christianity became blurred, irrespective of whether the members


had converted or retained their links with Judaism. "f-^

Many Frankist families kept a miniature of Frank's daughter Eva, who assumed leadership
after him, to be sent to the most prominent households. As describes Gershom
ScholemThe sect's exclusive organization continued to survive in this period through
agents who went from place to place, through secret gatherings and separate religious
rites, and through dissemination of a specifically Frankist literature. The "believers"
endeavored to marry only among themselves, and a wide network of inter-family
relationships was created among the Frankists, even among those who had remained
within the Jewish fold. Later Frankism was to a large extent the religion of families who
had given their children the appropriate education. The Frankists of Germany, Bohemia,
and Moravia usually held secret gatherings in Carlsbad in summer round about the ninth of

The ninth of the month of Av was not only the supposed date of birth of Shabbetai Zevi,
but is also known in Judaism as Tisha B'av. In Judaism, Tisha B'Av is the darkest day on
the Jewish calendar, commemorating the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem, first by
the Babylonians, and secondly by the Romans. Also, the ninth of Av, 1492, was the day
the Jews were expelled from Spain. The day is observed by Jews as a day of fasting and
prayer. However, the Frankists celebrated the day with revel and orgies.


The llluminati

According to John Robison, who in 1798 exposed the devious evolution of the llluminati
inof the exceptionable innovations and dissentions had arisen about the time that Proofs
of a Conspiracy, remarked, of German Freemasonry, "I saw it much connected with many
occurrences and schisms in the Christian church; I saw that the Jesuits had several times
interfered in it; and that most

that the order of Loyola was suppressed; so that it should seem, that these intriguing
brethren had attempted to maintain their influence by the help of Free Masonry.''^-^
Therefore, when Pope Clement XIV dissolved the Jesuits in 1773, Adam Weishaupt,
referred to as "a Jesuit in disguise" by his closest associate. Baron von Knigge,
established the llluminati as a secret order modeled on them.f-^


The doctrines of the llluminati, according to Albert Pike, a 33rd degree Scottish Rite
Mason, as well as leading member of the llluminati during the nineteenth century, was, like
their predecessors, the Templars, Rosicrucians, and Freemasons, the ancient tradition of


the Kabbalah: The Occult Science of the Ancient Magi was concealed under the shadows
of the Ancient Mysteries: it was imperfectly revealed or rather disfigured by the Gnostics: it
is guessed at under the obscurities that cover the pretended crimes of the Templars; and it
is found enveloped in enigmas that seem impenetrable, in the Rites of the Highest

Magism was the Science of Abraham and Orpheus, of Confucius and Zoroaster. It was the
dogmas of this Science that were engraven on the tables of stone by Enoch and
Trismegistus. Moses purified and re-veiled them, for that is the meaning of the word
reveal. He covered them with a new veil, when he made of the Holy Kabbalah the
exclusive heritage of the people of Israel, and the inviolable Secret of its priests. The
Mysteries of Thebes and Eleusis preserved among the nations some symbols of it, already
altered, and the mysterious key whereof was lost among the instruments of an ever-
growing superstition. Jerusalem, the murderess of her prophets, and so often prostituted to
the false gods of the Syrians and Babylonians, had at length in its turn lost the Holy Word,
when a Prophet announced by the Magi by the consecrated Star of Initiation [Sirius], came
to rend asunder the worn veil of the old Temple, in order to give the Church a new tissue of
legends and symbols, that still and ever conceal from the Profane, and ever preserves to
the Elect the same truths. f-^

According to Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman, in To Eliminate the Opiate, it the founder of the
Rothschild dynasty who convinced Weishaupt to accept the Frankist doctrine, and who
afterwards financed the llluminati, with the aim of fulfilling the Frankist plot of subverting
the world's religions, or the Kabbalah's Zionist objective of instituting a global
government to be ruled by the expected Messiah. f-^

A Jewish goldsmith, born Amschel Moses Bauer, who decided to settle in Frankfurt. He
opened a Counting House, and over the door placed his sign, a red shield, featuring a
"Star of David". The shied is the same flag granted to the Prague Jews by Charles IV, and
is in accordance with the Frankist doctrine of Edom or Esau, and the red banner of the
Khazars, or Red Jews. As "red shield" in German is Roth Schild, Bauer's son, Amschel
Mayer Bauer, took on the name Rothschild.


It is Rothschild who said, "give me control of a nation's money, and I care not who makes
her laws." Rothschild's wealth was largely achieved through his association with the family


of Hesse-Kassel. Rothschild served a three year apprenticeship in Hanover at the Bank of
Oppenheim, at the service to Lt. Gen. Baron von Estorff, who was the principal adviser to
Landgrave Frederick II of Hesse-Kassel. Frederick II was a member of the Order of the
Garter, as well as the wealthiest man in Europe, much of it inherited from his father,
Wilhelm VIII, brother of the King of Sweden.

The House of Hesse is descended from Philip I the "Magnanimous" Landgrave of Hesse,
who was a leading champion of the Protestant Reformation. In the early Middle Ages,
Hesse was a part of Thuringia, but in the War of the Thuringian Succession, in the
thirteenth century, Hesse gained its independence and became an Earldom within the Holy
Roman Empire. The state existed until the death of Philip in 1567. Philip was a descendant
of Margaret, the sister of Frederick I Margrave of Brandenburg, who had married Hermann
Landgrave of Hessen. Philip married Chistine of Saxony, whose mother was Barbara of
Jagellon, a great-granddaughter of Holy Roman Emperor Sigismund. Despite Philip's
intentions, Hessen was split among his four sons, but the only two to states to survive
were Hessen-Kassel and Hessen-Darmstadt. Philip's daughter, Elizabeth, married Ludwig
VI Elector of the Palatinate of the Rhine, grandfather of Frederick V.

Frederick II of Hessen-Kassel was the great-grandson of Elizabeth Charlotte, the sister of
Frederick V of the Palatinate. Elizabeth Charlotte was also the grandmother to Frederick I
King of Prussia. Frederick II of


Hessen-Kassel was a direct descendant of "Maurice the Learned" of Hesse-Kassel, uncle
to Frederick IV of the Palatine. Maurice had procured the services of prominent
Rosicrucians and alchemists, like Michael Maier, while the town of Kassel itself, according
to Francis Yates, was where the Rosicrucian Manifestos were first published. Frederick II
of Hessen-Kassel married Maria Princess of Hanover, cousin of Frederick II the Great King
of Prussia, and the daughter of George II King of England.


Rothschild coat of arms

Baron von Estorff advised the Landgrave that Mayer Amschel showed an exceptional
ability to increase wealth through his investments. Mayer Amschel arranged to hire 16,800
Hessian soldiers to assist the nephew of Federick's wife. King George III of England, in
suppressing the American Rebellion. When Frederick II of Hessen-Kassel died in 1785,
Rothschild obtained total influence over his successor, Karl's brother Elector Wilhelm IX,
who he managed to make one of the wealthiest monarchs of his time. In 1773, Mayer
Rothschild had invited twelve other wealthy and influential men, representing in all the


thirteen bloodlines of the llluminati, to convince them to pool their resources in a plot to
bring about a new world order. Thus was Adam Weishaupt commissioned to establish the
llluminati. Though born Jewish, as a young boy, Weishaupt was educated by the Jesuits.
On May 1, 1776, three years after the Jesuit order was disbanded by the Church,
Weishaupt announced the foundation of the Order of Perfectibilists, which later became
more widely known as the llluminati.


The Asiatic Brethren

Jacob Frank's nephew and successor was Moses Dobruschka, who converted to
Christianity, and entered the Habsburg nobility with the name of Franz Thomas von
Schoenfeld. As Franz, he entered into Austrian Freemasonry, and became involved with
Ecker von Eckhoffen. During the early 1780s, Eckhoffen became disgruntled with the Gold
and Rosy Cross of 1777, and, with Dobruschka and members of the Habsburg nobility,
formed what became known as the Asiatic Brethren. f—^

The basis of the Asiatic Brethren, also known as the Fratres Lucis, or the Brotherhood of
Light, was the Rosicrucianism, Martinism and the llluminati. They purportedly represented
a survival of the Sabians, though they were comprised chiefly of Jews, Turks, Persians,
and Armenians. The full title of the organization was The Knights and Brethren of St. John
the Evangelist.


Karl Landgrave of Hessen-Kassell

The Grand Master of the Asiatic Brethren, and leading member of the llluminati, was
Prince Karl, the brother of Wilhelm I of Hessen-Kassel.f— ^ Both were the sons of Frederick
II of Hessen-Kassel, from his wife, Mary of Hanover, Princess of Great Britain, daughter of
George II King of England, and therefore


cousin to Frederick II the Great of Prussia. Karl married his first cousin, Louise, Princess of
Denmark, of the Oldenberg dynasty that produced the Kings of Denmark, Norway, Greece,
and the later Romanovs, Emperors of Russia. According to legend, the Oldenbergs are
descended from Elgimar, a brother of Godfroi of Bouillon, from the Swan Knight and

whose mother was Karl's mother's sister, Louise of Hanover, Princess of England. f—^


Count St. Germain

Another member of the Asiatic Brethren, the Comte de St. Germain. St. Germain was a
notorious charlatan and alchemist, whom many believed to be immortal. He was the
supposed Grand Master of Freemasonry, and had become an acquaintance of Louis XV
King of France and his mistress Madame de Pompadour. St. Germain was a permanent
houseguest of Karl's, who called him "the greatest philosopher who ever lived," and
nicknamed him "Papa".f— ^



St. Germain was in St Petersburg to conspire when the Russian army assisted Catherine
the Great in usurping the throne from her husband Peter III of Russia. The Russian royal
family was descended from the Babylonian Exilarch through John Paleologos, eponymous

ancestor of the Palaeogan dynasty that married into the Byzantine Royal family. f—^ The
Palaeologan dynasty began with Michael VIII Palaiologos, who became emperor in 1259,
and his descendants ruled until the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks in 1453.
Because of their intermarriage with European families, the Palaeologans were the first
Imperial family to have crests and coats-of-arms in the Western manner, using the Imperial
double-headed eagle.

Catherine was a German princess with a very remote Russian ancestry. She was from the
House of Anhalt Zerbst from the House of Anhalt Zerbst, formed in the twelfth century,
from the son of Albert I Margrave of Brandenburg, Bernard III Duke of Saxony, who
married Judith of Poland, the daughter of Mieszko III, and Elizabeth Arpad, granddaughter
Geza Arpad and of Vladimir I of Kiev.


Catherine the Great

Catherine the Great is remembered as one of the "Enlightened Monarchs", because she
implemented several politcal and cultural reforms on behalf of the llluminati. Voltaire, with
whom she maintained regular correspondence, called her "Semiramis of Russia", in
reference to the ancient Babylonian queen, on whom the worship of the goddess Astarte
was based.

Catherine was succeeded by her son Csar Paul I. In her memoirs, she strongly implies
that his father was not her husband, the Grand Duke Peter, later Emperor, but her lover
Sergei Saltykoff.f— ^ One of many aliases, Saltykoff was the name assumed by Count St.
Germain, when he served as a Russian General while they were fighting the Turks. f—^
Csar Paul Paul himself was also a Mason, as well as Grand Master of the Knights of


Csar Paul I of Russia

Leading llluminati like Pasquales, Saint-Martin and Swedenborg were all members of the
Asiatic Brethren. Following the order's demise, the title of llluminati was given to the
Martinists, founded by Saint-Martin. t^^l The origin of the Ordre Martiniste et Synarchique is
found in French mystic, Martinez Pasquales, born in 1727. He organized a movement
which he named the Ordre des Chevalier Magons Elus-Coen de L'Univers, or "Order of the
Knight Masons, Elected Priests of the Universe", though his work was carried on by his
pupil, Louis-Claude de Saint-Martin, who later founded the order known as the Martinists,
or the French Illumines. In 1771, an amalgamation of all the Masonic groups was effected
at the new lodge of the Amis Reunis. A further development of the Amis Reunis was the
Rite of the Philalethes, formed by Savalette de Langes in 1773, out of Swedenborgian,
Martinist, and Rosicrucian mysteries.

Emmanuel Swedenborg became interested in the teachings of Dr. Samuel Jacob Falk,
known as the "Baal Shem" of London, who was reputed to exercise miraculous powers
through his supposed mastery of the magical names of God. Falk was a crypto-
Shabbatean, who collaborated with a network of fellow Zoharits in England, Holland,
Poland, and Germany. f—^ Nesta Webster, in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements,
explained, "Falk indeed was far more than a Mason, he was a high initiate the supreme
oracle to which the secret socieites applied for guidance." Finally, according to Savallete
de Langes, "some people believe him to be the Chief of all the Jews and attribute to purely
political schemes all that is marvellous and singular in his life and conduct."^— ^


Emmanuel Swedenborg

Webster also suggests that Falk would have been the source for the "Egyptian Rite" Count
Cagliostro created in London. Cagliostro, whose original name is thought to have been
Giuseppe Balsamo, was a magician and charlatan who enjoyed enormous success in
Parisian high society, in the years preceding the French Revolution. According to his own
fraudulent account, however, he was born an orphan on the Island of Malta. His earliest
memories, he claimed, are of the holy city of Medina in Arabia, where he was called
"Acharat", and where he lived in the palace of the Mufti Salahaym. Four persons were
attached to his service, the chief of whom was an Eastern Adept named Althotas, who
instructed him in the various sciences and made him proficient in several Oriental
languages. Though both teacher and pupil conformed outwardly to the religion of Islam,
Cagliostro later wrote, "the true religion was imprinted in our hearts. "f—^

Historians, however, believe Balsamo was the son of poor parents, and grew up as an
urchin in the streets of Palermo. Escaping from Sicily after a series of minor crimes, he
traveled through Greece, Egypt, Persia, Arabia, and Rhodes and apparently studied
alchemy. He eventually assumed the title of count, and in 1768 married the Roman beauty
Lorenza Feliciani, called Serafina. He traveled all the major European cities, selling elixirs
of youth and potions, and posing as an alchemist, soothsayer, medium, and miracle
healer. His seances had become popular in fashionable society in Paris by 1785.

According to his own admission, Cagliostro's mission "was to work so as to turn
Freemasonry in the direction of Weishaupt's projects". f—] Louis Blanc, in his History of the
French Revolution, 1848, reported that Cagliostro was initiated into the llluminati at
Frankfort, 1781, under the authority of "the Grand Masters of the Templars". From them he
received instructions and funds to carry out their diabolical intrigues, through the famous
"affair of the necklace" against Marie Antoinette, in preparation for their eventual seizure of
power. As a consequence, he spent nine months in the Bastille prison, until he was finally
banished from France. In 1789 he was arrested in Rome after his wife had denounced him
to the Inquisition as a heretic, magician, conjuror, and Freemason. He was finally tried and
sentenced to death, but his sentence was later commuted to life imprisonment in the


fortress of San Leo in the Apennines, where he eventually died.


The French Revolution

As part of his plan for political revolution, Weishaupt aimed to infiltrate Masonic lodges,
and establish a hidden power base. Within a short time, the llluminati had lodges all over
Germany and Austria, while branches were founded in Italy, Hungary, France, and
Switzerland. However, it was the llluminati plot to overthrow the Habsburgs in 1784,
exposed by police spies who had infiltrated the order, which led to the Bavarian
government to ban all secret societies, and driving the followers of Weishaupt
underground. Nevertheless, sufficient evidence remained that its members continued
under different guises, spreading subversive ideas, and scheming behind the scenes.Ba


Louis Philippe II Duke d'Orleans

Unhindered, the llluminati proceeded with their plot for revolution in France. The chief
conduit of their activities was the Loge des Chealiers Bienfaisants at Lyons. This Lodge
stood at the head of French Freemasonry, and is where the fictitious Order of Masonic
Knights Templars was formed. Its Grand Master was llluminati member, the Duke of
Orleans. He was merely Lieutenant to Frederick the Great, the Grand Master of all
Freemasonry, though both shared Stuart lineage. The Duke's great-grandfather was
Philippe II, son of Philip I and Elizabeth-Charlotte, grand-daughter of Frederick, Elector of
the Palatinate of the Rhine, and Elizabeth, daughter of King James I of England. Thus, the
Duke of Orleans' primary motivation, besides his hatred of the King and his wife, Marie
Antoinette, was to himself succeed as King following the sought revolution.

About eight years before the Revolution, Orleans was elected Grand Master of France,
and the whole association of various lodges came to be known as the Grand Orient. The


chief instigators of the Revolution, Mirabeau, Condorcet, Rochefoucault and others, were
high-raking officers of these lodges. The Count Mirabeau was himself a member of the
llluminati, and had attended the Grand Masonic Convention in 1782, at Wilhelmsbad, in
Hessen-Kassell, where the ground-plan for the coming revolution was reputed to have
originally been discussed. In 1788, deputies of the llluminati were sent, upon his request,
to inform the French lodges on strategy. Their first item of advice was the creation of a
Political Committee in every lodge, and from these committees arose the Jacobins Club.
Soon, nearly every lodge in the Grand Orient was infiltrated by supporters of Weishaupt,
who became active in spreading the political policies of terrorism against the state. It was
the English Civil War which initially ushered in the opposition of the Church's interference
in civil affairs. And, through the increasing influence of Masonic writers, primarily John
Locke, who promoted a


"Natural Law" in contradistinction to Biblical law, the economy became increasingly
regarded as a self-governing phenomenon. Therefore, Masonic and llluminati
propagandists increasingly argued that religious morality was not needed to govern
economic practices, which in themselves were virtuous. It was the Freemason, Adam
Smith, in The Wealth of Nations, who proposed the notion that unrestrained selfishness
was actually positive, by producing sufficient wealth to be distributed to other parts of
society by an "invisible hand".


Marquis de Condorcet

All the leading philosophers of the Enlightenment were Freemasons, or members of the
llluminati, and assisted in propagating its goals. Therefore, through the influence of
Lurianic Kabbalah, they fostered the idea that humanity is progressing through ever higher
stages of development, which would culminate in the rule of "reason", and "freedom",
meaning the full emancipation from the tyranny of "superstition" of religion. According to
llluminati member, Marie Jean Caritat, Marquis de Condorcet, who wrote. Outline of a
Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind, history progresses through nine
stages, with a tenth, still ahead, when man will enjoy freedom, equality, and justice. The


first of these epochs, is that of mankind living in kinship organization, with the simplest
possible economy and the beginnings of religion. The eight succeeding epochs develop
through the origins of language, craft, pastoralism, villages, towns, commerce, and
reaching the heights of ancient classical civilization.


Gotthold Ephraim Lessing

Next was the "barbarism" of Christian society, succeeded by the Renaissance, the rise of
modern science, with the ninth epoch culminating in the success of the project of the
Enlightenment. For Condorcet, "everything points to the fact that we are verging upon the
epoch of one of the great revolutions of the human race . . . The existing state of
knowledge guarantees that it will be auspicious." The tenth epoch still in the future, will
represent man's final achievement of full equality, liberty, justice, and abolition of not
merely poverty and hunger, but of all remaining impediments upon the human mind.


Emmanuel Kant

Likewise, in The Education of the Human Race, llluminati member, Gotthold Ephraim
Lessing, incorporated Enlightenment ideas of human advancement. Lessing is most
famous for his Nathan the Wise, in reference to "crypto-Shabbatean", Rabbi Falk of
London. Much more substantial and systematic was the work of Johann Gottfried Herder,
also of the llluminati, and the leading figure behind the rise of the German nationalism of
the Romantic period. In Outlines of a Philosophy of History of Man, Herder presents
mankind in a ceaseless process of evolution: commencing with the beginnings of the
human race, proceeding, stage by stage, and reaching the level of civilization which was
German at its best, but including the rest of the West as well.


The final German Enlightenment philosopher of note was Immanuel Kant, who was
influenced by Emmanual Swedenborg, wrote the Idea of a Universal History from a
Cosmopolitical Point of View, in which the progress of mankind is made central. Some of
his propositions clearly outline the llluminati agenda:


...The history of the human race, viewed as a whole, may be regarded as the
realization of a hidden plan of nature to bring about a political constitution, internally,
and, for this purpose, also externally perfect, as the only state in which all the
capacities implanted by her in mankind can be fully developed. f—^


In 1789, when the Bastille was stormed, the Comte de Mirabeau, allegedly said.


"the idolatry of the monarchy has received a death blow from the sons and
daughters of the Order of the Templars."[2S]


Albert Pike declared that,

"the secret movers of the French Revolution had sworn to overthrow the Throne and
the Altar upon the Tomb of Jacques de Molay."[


The revolutionaries, many of whom were members of Masonic organizations, adopted the
symbolism and language of the occult societies. The Masonic tenets of Equality, Liberty
and Fraternity, became their rallying cry. When Louis XIV, King of France was executed, a
voice in the crowd cried out "De Molay is avenged!"


The American Revolution

Just prior to the French Revolution, the llluminati was also conspiring to bring about the
American Revolution of 1776. Among the fifty-six American rebels who signed the
Declaration of Independence, only six were not Masons. The American constitution itself
was inspired by the French Revolution, and the ideals of Freemasonry. It enshrined
"Liberty", meaning freedom from the yoke of Christian morality, rules which it attempted to
replace with "unalienable rights", a concept originally discussed among the secret
meetings of the llluminati.


^ - .T,"^


Both Washington and Jefferson, founder of the Democratic Party, were the leading
descendants of Alain IV de Bretagne, the Fisher King, and therefore, descendants of
Joseph of Arimathea and the "Sea god"J— ^ Also, both Washington and Jefferson were
ardent defenders of Adam Weishaupt, while Jefferson even referred to him as an "an
enthusiastic philanthropist". George Washington wrote instead that he did not deny "the
Doctrines of the llluminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United
States." "On the contrary", he replied "no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am."
He continued:


The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free
Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical
tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of
separation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or
instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may
have had these objects; and actually had a seperation of the People from their
Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.^— ^


It was Jefferson who had been responsible for infiltrating the llluminati into the then newly
organized lodges of the "Scottish Rite" in New England. Jefferson defended Weishaupt

As Weishaupt lived under the tyranny of a despot and priests, he knew that caution
was necessary even in spreading information, and the principles of pure morality.
This has given an air of mystery to his views, was the foundation of his
banishment.... If Weishaupt had written here, where no secrecy is necessary in our
endeavors to render men wise and virtuous, he would not have thought of any
secret machinery for that purpose, t— ^


Thomas Jefferson

In September 18, 1793, President George Washington dedicated the United States
Capitol. Dressed in Masonic apron, the president placed a silver plate on the cornerstone
and covered it with the Masonic symbols of corn, oil and wine. The plan of the city of
Washington DC itself was designed by Freemason and architect Pierre Charles L'Enfante
in the form of a pentagram, or five-pointed star. In 1848, in a Masonic ceremony, the
cornerstone was laid of the Washington Monument, an obelisk or pillar, like those formerly
dedicated to the dying gods of ancient Middle East. And, every president of the United
States since Independence has purportedly been a 33rd degree Freemason.



f^l Scholem, Scholem, Kabbalah, p. 274.

f^l Rosenthal, Herman and Dubnow, S.M. " Frank, Jacob, and the Frankists ". Jewish


f^l Antelman, To Eliminate the Opiate .

[4] ibid.

[^] ibid.

f^l Robison. Proofs of a Conspiracy .

f^l Terry Melanson llluminati Conspiracy Part One: A Precise Exegesis on the Available

Evidence .

[^1 Morals and Dogma, p. 840.

f^l Rabbi Antelman, Eliminate The Opiate, Volumes I and II] The Master Plan of the

Illuminated Rothschilds, Ron Patton interview with Marion Knox .

f^^l Scholem, Gershom. Kabbalah, Part II, 3, "Jacob Frank and the Frankists," p. 304 - 305

f^^l Katz, Jacob. Jews and Freemasons in Europe . Translated from the Hebrew by Leonard
Oschry. Chapter III. The Order of the Asiatic Brethren.

f^^l The Peerage, " Karl Landgraf von Hessen-Kassell (M) " Alison Weir, Britain's Royal
Family: A Complete Genealogy {London, U.K.: The Bodley Head, 1999),


f^^l Melanson, Terry. Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: A Precise Exegesis on the Available

Evidence .

f^^l David Hughes, " Davidic Dynasty ".

[^^] "Paul of Russia", Wikipedia .

f^^l Una Pope-Hennessy, Secret Societies and the French Revolution , 1876-1949.

f^^l Leon Zeldis, " Freemasonry in Russia ."

f^^l Anonymous, Rituals of the Fratres Lucis.

f^^l Schuchard, Marsha Keith. Why Mrs. Blake Cried: Swedenborg, Blake, and the Sexual

Basis of Sprit ual Vision .

[20] vvebster, Nesta. Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 189.

f^^^ Confessions of Count Cagliostro.

[22] Webster, Nesta. Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, Chap. 8: The Jewish

Cabalists .

[^^1 Wilgus, Sergei. Illuminoids, p. 23.

f^^l Quoted from Robert Nisbet, The Idea of Progress.

[^^1 Occult Conspiracy p. 68.

f^^l Morals and Dogma, p. 823.

f^^l Family Trees, American & European Family Forest, Millenium Edition, CD-ROM (P.O.

Box 6168, Kamuela, HI 96743. Robert Brian Stewart, " Captain Lawrence Washington ".

f^^l Excerpt: Fisher, Paul. Behind the Lodge Door

f^^l Illuminati Exposed.


Dean Henderson Red Scare on America

The budding genre of left-wing conspiracy research, intuitively attractive as a unifying force to many, attempts to break imposed philosophical paradigms and to deprogram minds in a world traumatized and confused by the Illuminati’s biggest psyops program ever – the Cold War. This delicate task requires a historically-grounded progressive political framework which, while taking a backseat to realpolitik, remains pertinent.

While the mainstream left refuses to acknowledge any hint of conspiracy, no matter the number of footnotes; the Alex Jones “right/left paradigm is dead” crowd, while open to deep politics, leans right ideologically, enabling the banker cabal in its quest for global hegemony via 18th century mercantilism – the purest form of capitalism ever practiced.

It is incredibly naïve to believe that the Illuminati bankers wish to usher in communism as their economic model. The real world tells us that wealth is not being redistributed. It is being concentrated in the hands of the few at historic levels.

The left’s problem lies in naiveté and cowardice, and in its inability to deconstruct the brutal state capitalism imposed via the Soviet Union. The libertarian conspiracy crowd lacks a background in political theory – their Cato Institute is funded by the same corporations that fund the two major political parties. They too have been brainwashed since birth by the mysterious events that culminated in the Soviet Union.

An analysis of these events is key to understanding the Red Scare, which haunts an increasingly extreme right-wing American political landscape and hinders our ability to formulate practical economic solutions that incorporate both capitalistic and socialistic economic tenants. It also goes a long way in explaining the incredible naiveté of the American mainstream “left”.

In 1822 Russia’s Czar Alexander banned Freemasonry from his country. When Czar Nicholas took the throne he renewed the ban, but the secret society went underground and survived. Karl Marx was a member of the League of the Just which later became the Communist League. The group was an off-shoot of the Society of Seasons, which had close ties to the Grand Orient Freemason Lodge of Paris. Frederick Engel was a wealthy German industrialist. [714]

Marx and Engel were driven by the philosophies of Freidrich Hegel, whose now infamous Hegelian dialectic put forth a process whereby opposites thesis and antithesis are reconciled into synthesis.

Though Hegel’s philosophy was adopted by Marx, it was equally attractive to Adolf Hitler and the Rothschild Business Roundtable that sponsored him. The Roundtable saw in the dialectic a boon to their monopolies by presenting phony communism (antithesis) as bogeyman to capitalism (thesis). The ensuing conflict – the Cold War – produced a huge market for arms and oil which their trusts manufactured.

Genuine revolutionary struggle in the Third World could be labeled as a “Soviet communist conspiracy” and more arms could then be sent to depopulate the undesirable poor, dispensing of agitators who threatened Roundtable interests. The pure application of communism, which indigenous peoples practiced for thousands of years prior to the arrival of Annunaki invaders in Sumeria, was the real threat to the “special bloodline” international bankers.

By upholding Soviet state capitalism to all the world as an example of “failed Communism”, the bankers could discredit this dangerous idea while producing their desired synthesis – a New World Order ruled by the Illuminati banking families and Black Nobility monarchs, with laissez-faire monopoly capitalism as their economic paradigm.

The Russian Hohenzollern family monarchy to which the czars belonged wasn’t playing ball. They grew suspicious of the Freemasons, who they knew to be agents of the international bankers. In 1915 the American International Corporation (AIC) was formed to finance a Russian revolution aimed at deposing the Hohenzollerns and launching the banker’s grand Hegelian experiment. AIC directors included Frank Vanderlip, who two years prior had attended the secret Jekyll Island meetings that formulated the private Federal Reserve; and George Herbert Walker, grandfather of George Bush Sr. The families of Rockefeller, Rothschild, Du Pont, Kuhn, Loeb, Schiff and Harriman were represented on AIC’s board. [715]

WWI was looming and the Allied powers needed to open a diversionary front against the Germans. Russian Bolshevik leader Leon Trotsky left New York by ship on March 27, 1917, just days before the US entered WWI. He had with him a US passport, 300 revolutionaries and a wad of cash supplied by the Wall Street banker crowd. Twelve days earlier Czar Nicholas II had stepped down amidst an uprising launched by genuine anarchist revolutionaries, inspired by the writings of the Russian philosopher Kropotkin, who preached revolution followed by immediate decentralization of power, a sharp contrast to the iron-fisted state capitalist control under which Russia was about to fall. The anarchists struck fear into the heart of Wall Street, so they dispatched Trotsky to derail their Menshevik plans.

As Trotsky and his Reds sailed east, Vladimir Lenin left Switzerland in a sealed train with 150 more “revolutionaries” and $5 million in cash. The train passed through Germany without inspection thanks to banker Max Warburg’s intervention. Meanwhile, fifteen international bankers under Red Cross cover traveled to Petrograd to provide additional financing to the Bolsheviks and to make off with Russia’s gold reserves, just as they would later make off with German gold reserves following WWII and Chinese gold reserves after the 1949 Revolution.[716] Prince Lvov, who replaced the deposed Czar Nicholas II, and his successor Alexander Kerensky both publicly denounced Trotsky and Lenin as German intelligence agents.

The war between Mensheviks and Bolsheviks lasted until 1922. Some 28 million Russians died. The unruly anarchists were eventually disposed of and the Roundtable crowd launched its “antithesis” in Moscow. Trotsky and Lenin were likely unaware they were being used by the bankers. Trotsky fled to Mexico City, where he was murdered by Stalin’s agents in 1940. Lenin died in 1924. He had by then identified the powerful forces behind his ascent as “monopoly finance capitalists”. Towards the end of his life he wrote, “The state does not function as we desired. A man is at the wheel and seems to lead it, but the car does not drive in the desired direction. It moves as another force wishes.”[717]

John D. Rockefeller, Nathan Rothschild, Max Warburg, Jacob Schiff and J. Pierpont Morgan seized the new Soviet opportunity. Their Four Horsemen always had interests in Russia. The Rothschild and Nobel families discovered oil in Baku in 1898 with their Far East Trading Company, but anarchist oilfield revolutionaries burned their newly renamed Royal Dutch/Shell installations to the ground.

By 1922 Rockefeller’s Chase National Bank launched the American-Russian Chamber of Commerce. In 1925 Chase negotiated a deal with Soviet Prombank to market Russia’s raw materials to the West, while helping the Bolsheviks import cotton and machinery. Chase and its sister insurance conglomerate Equitable Trust led the way in providing credit to the Soviets, selling Bolshevik bonds in the US by 1928 with help from Morgan Guaranty.

Rep. Louis McFadden (D-NY), chair of the House Banking Committee, remarked, “The Soviet government has been given US Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Banks acting through Chase Bank and Guaranty Trust Company…Find out what business has been transacted for the State Bank of the Soviet Union by its correspondent bank, Chase Bank of New York.”[718]

The chaos caused by the Bolshevik Revolution had been a boon to Rockefeller oil interests by eliminating much of Standard Oil’s competition in Russia. In 1926 Standard Oil of New York (Mobil) loaned $75 million to the Bolsheviks in exchange for exclusive rights to market Soviet oil in Europe. Mobil built a refinery in Russia.

In 1969 Rockefeller’s International Basic Economy Corporation (IBEC) – which later gave birth to the draconian Caribbean Basin Initiative – formed a partnership with N.M. Rothschild & Sons of London. Rockefeller’s partner in IBEC was Cleveland financier and industrialist Cyrus Eaton. The Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Eatons made huge profits facilitating Soviet trade with the West. In 1976 they signed an exclusive licensing and patent deal with Licensintorg, giving them a monopoly on technology transfer to the Soviets.

President Nixon forged detente with the Soviets and Chinese following the Vietnam War in 1973. That year also brought the Arab oil embargo, the pegging of oil to the US dollar, the launch of oil futures markets and the advent of a burgeoning Eurodollar market in London. Soon after Nixon held the detente summits with his counterparts Leonid Brezhnev and Zhou En-lai, Chase Manhattan opened a branch in Moscow and started a correspondent banking relationship with the Bank of China. [719]

Nixon appointed William Casey to head the Export-Import Bank. Casey was a CFR insider and leading Knight of Malta. He later managed Ronald Reagan’s 1980 October Surprise Presidential Campaign and was appointed CIA Director. At ExIm Bank Casey financed one of the grandest industrial schemes in history, the world’s largest truck factory at the Kama River in the Soviet Union. The factory was built by Pullman Corporation and was financed 10% by the Soviets, 45% by ExIm Bank and 45% by Chase Manhattan, where David Rockefeller was now chairman.

Chase risked nothing since its money was guaranteed by the Overseas Private Investment Corporation and Foreign Credit Insurance Association. If the Russians failed to pay the loans back, US taxpayers were on the hook for 90% of the Kama money. George Schultz – CFR, Bechtel and Chevron Texaco director who was Reagan’s Secretary of State – was key to the Kama River deal. Casey provided an ExIm Bank loan for Schultz’ Bechtel to build a Permindex-affiliated International Trade Center in Moscow in a deal arranged by Occidental Petroleum scion and Tennessee Gore political dynasty sponsor Armand Hammer. Other Casey ExIm Bank loans funded oil and gas pipelines and petrochemical and fertilizer plants. [720]

The US detente with the Soviets and China had more to do with a thirst for new energy supplies by the Four Horsemen than it did with grandiose statements of “promoting world peace”. China has huge oil deposits off its Senkaka Island in the East China Sea. Just northeast of Senkaka lie the Soviet Sakhalin Islands, an area that contains massive oil and gas deposits. The Soviet regions of Siberia and the Caspian Sea were even bigger oil prizes. As Chase Manhattan Senior Vice-President Albert Wentworth put it, “The Soviet Union is the last great undeveloped market for the US.”

Columnist Paul Scott hit the nail more squarely on the head when he wrote in 1976, “It is Kissinger’s belief that by controlling food one can control people, and by controlling energy – especially oil – one can control nations and their financial systems. By placing food and oil under international control along with the world’s monetary system, Kissinger is convinced a loosely knit world government can become a reality by 1980.”

Nixon Agriculture Secretary Earl Butz once bragged that through USAID’s P.L. 480 program the US employed “food as a weapon”, doling out food to nations who agree to follow IMF mandates, while withholding food from those who don’t. Just as Kissinger’s IAE benefits the Four Horsemen of Oil – Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco and Royal Dutch/Shell; P. L. 480 enriches the Four Horsemen of Grain – Cargill Continental, Louis Dreyfus, Bunge and Andre. As Chilean Minister of Agriculture Jacques Chonchol said, “Whoever controls food exports controls the world.”[721]

The Soviet Union was an artificial construct cooked up by the Illuminati bankers to create profitable conflict and, more importantly, to confuse the world’s population in the arena of political economy. The Red Scare they manufactured has become a Red Scar on the American psyche.

[1] The Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.160
[2] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.195
[3] Icke. p.163
[4] Marrs. p.196
[5] The Rockefeller File. Gary Allen. ’76 Press. Seal Beach, CA. 1973. p.101
[6] The World’s Money: International Banking from Bretton Woods to the Brink of Insolvency. Michael Moffitt. Simon & Schuster. New York. 1983 p65
[7] Allen. p.114
[8] Merchants of Grain. Dan Morgan. Viking Press. New York. 1979. p.39


On the Asiatic Brethren - A Study into the Construction of our Occult Past, Part 1
On the Asiatic Brethren - Part 1
„Each man is a memory to himself.” (William Wordsworth)

The work for this essay originally began with my research into the short-lived German occult order of the Asiatic Brethren in 2013. Since then it expanded significantly and helped me immensely to understand the syncretic furnace we call our occult tradition of the West. Most of all it taught me two things: First, that most stories as legendary and mythical as they might sound still contain at least a small grain of truth. And secondly, that often this grain of truth has no resemblance whatsoever to the stories we tell ourselves and call 'our tradition'.

Of course this short essay will be flawed as well. It will be flawed as I am not an academic student of the history of religions myself and can only piece this work together during private spare time. It will also be flawed because I don't speak Hebrew - a fact in itself that disqualifies me for much of this work according to my own standards. On the other hand, however, at least I am a native German speaker and thus can explore all the first-hand sources of the Asiatic Brethren as far as I have access to them today. Furthermore - and maybe more importantly - I don't hold any occult agenda or affiliation. I am not part of any occult order and have no interest in occult lineages whatsoever. Instead what drives me is to better understand what drove the people before me?

If we are dwarfs standing on the shoulders of giants, we might want to better understand where these giants came from? And wether it's any worthwhile being carried around by them, sitting quietly on their shoulders? Or wether it could be much more adventurous to jump off them - and find our own paths. After all at least for the last two millennial magic has been the discipline of heresy. Thus we should be careful with acknowledging any orthodoxy. Even when it comes to our own occult past.

Frater Acher
May the serpent bite its tail.

P.S. This essay will first appear as a series of blog posts on Once completed, I will re-edit it and offer it for free download as a consolidated eBook.

I) Introduction: On the construction of Occult Memory
There is a curious theory on the collective memory of groups. According to Jan and Aleida Assmann - two leading German scholars on Egyptology and Cultural Studies - one has to differentiate between a ‘cultural’ and a ‘communicative memory’ of groups. While the former is vast in scope, relatively structured and embraces all archeological and written inheritance of a group, the latter is much more fluid and only contains knowledge perceived as still relevant to everyday communication by group members.

One of the fascinating features of the ‘communicative memory’ is that studies proved that it tends to contain only knowledge of the past three generations. I.e. as long as our identities are built upon on our communicative memory, there is a cliff of forgetting and blindness that sets in around 80 years in the past from the present day. Whatever falls of that cliff sinks into oblivion of everyday communication - i.e. it is still recorded in writing and possibly part of academic studies, but ceases to form part of the everyday set of symbols of a collective. Often the ‘communicative memory’ then reappears about 500 years into the past, marked by a much more mythical terminology and narrative.

Well, let’s see what happens if we apply this theory to the make-up of our Western occult roots? If we travel back into our past 80 years from today we find ourselves back in the 1930s. Maybe due to the significance of certain individual biographies of that time our ‘communicative memory’ stretches back a little further, another 20 to 30 years? We recall the foundation of the Golden Dawn, events in the life of Aleister Crowley, the impact of the two World Wars on society and many lodges and maybe how many spiritualists strived to combine latest technological discoveries with theories of the occult... But what do we recall about the 19th century? Except for a few guidepost names such as Eliphas Levi, Papus, Bulwer Lytton or Frederick Hockley I’d assume most of our minds come up blank? And even considering these names: how much of them do we truly remember? How much of their personalities, their personal struggles and desires, their biographies and characters versus their writings and a few of their occult theories?

But if we travel further back in our memories and bridge this strange gap between 80 and 500 years of our past? Now we are in the 16th century. And here we meet John Dee and Edward Kelly and hear the echo of mythical names such as Johannes Trithemius, Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Francis Bacon or Giordano Bruno. Yet, these names have taken on a different form than what we know from our living memory: they turned into mirrors of their times, into collective ideas, archetypes almost. Or how much difference in nuances and shades truly do we find between our memories of Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa and one Dr. Faust?

What I am trying to say is this: For as much as our occult history has craved to build chains and links of lineage into our past, our actual memories beyond the time of our great-grandparents are pretty narrow and patchy at best. Now, why does that matter? It matters because the more we travel back in time from this point onwards, the more our ancestors made us belief our feet rest on the solid ground of occult history and tradition. Yet, upon closer examination it rather seems the opposite is true: It is much wiser to assume our tradition is an invention of creative people who depended on it to underpin their authority just as much as our own desire for genuineness and originality. It is wise to take such approach to the dazzling mirror we call an occult tradition, until we have done our own research on facts and truths. A story should remain a story, until we have proven it to be a record of events.

II) On the Asiatic Brethren
Now that was a rather long exposition to dive into an actual example of these collective memory patterns. It actually is an example of what many of us have forgotten or never heard about. Yet some of us have used it to create their own mythical stories from it. The specific example I will invite you to explore with me is a German masonic order often referred to as ‘The Knights and Brethren St.John the Evangelist of Asia in Europe’ or in short simply the ‘Asiatic Brethren’.

Cover of the original teachings of the Asiatic Brethren, published in 1803

You can e.g. read about their history in Hanegraaff’s wonderful Dictionary, which is why I will only provide a brief outline here: The Asiatic Brethren were founded by a Bavarian Officer, Hans Heinrich von Ecker und Eckhoffen (HHEE, 1750- 1790). Their foundation followed the rather unsuccessful earlier attempt of the latter to bring to life a new rosicrucian order, the ‘Ordo Rotae et Aureae Crucis’ (The Order of the Wheel and Golden Cross) in 1776. While this order played a significant role in the emergence of Adam Weishaupt’s order of the Bavarian Illuminati they ceased to exist relatively quickly as HHEE couldn’t attract many members. After his expulsion from the order of the 'Gold- und Rosenkreuzer` (Gold and Rosy Cross) in 1780, HHEE moved from Munich to Vienna where the order of Asiatic Brethren was founded. Another title of the order often is given as 'Ritter und Brüder des Lichts', i.e. Knights and Brothers of the Light.

Now, before we continue further it might be important to point out that secret societies and orders flourished like weeds during the 17th and 18th century in Germany. Most of them also had the life-expectancy of weeds and disappeared quickly into forgetfulness. During these days a secret order or masonic lodge offered the unparalleled opportunity to gain a powerful network of allies as well as to earn money through membership fees for their leaders. Remember, this was a time when no political parties or workers’ unions existed, most European countries were still ruled by emperors and kings and the French revolution was only a few decades away. Having a personal network of strong relationships into the various sectors of society was a tool so priceless and powerful - most men were happy to pay for it, especially if the price was as low as regularly wearing silly robes, standing silently in candle-light and listening to the enigmatic babbling of one ‘master of the chair’. On the other hand occult books and manuscripts were very incredibly rare and often accessible to the privileged only. Thus anyone with a genuine interest in the occult equally needed a broad network of allies to be able to tap into the oral or written tradition they aimed to become a part of…

In light of the above it might not come as a surprise that the Asiatic Brethren were dismantled only nine years after their emergence in 1781. Seventy-three years later, in a source from 1863 we learn about how quickly they actually were dismantled and disappeared:

“The asiatic lodges disappeared everywhere with a fabulous pace. After excision of the characteristic details the costumes of the various degrees found their way to junk dealers and theatrical costumiers. The Gold- and Silversmiths of Vienna, for as far as the brothers had been freemasons, were occupied for weeks with the melting down of asiatic alliance-insignia and gems, the laboratory on the Landstrasse fell into decline, however, not before becoming the place of a peculiar event which didn’t cause little agitation and dismay in the neighbourhood. Namely, one had agreed to (…) sacrifice to the flames many of the asiatic diplomas and certificates - a purpose that was executed with such haste and vehemence that black clouds of stinking smoke flooded the whole neighbourhood and scraps of burning paper rained on the streets which caused the sudden call ‘Fire!’. The guardians of the fire watch gave the known signal, the fire engines rushed to the street, yet the mob showed more appetite to loot the place than to quench the fire and showed all signs of being ready to storm the building. It was only with trouble and effort that the poor brothers (…) managed to escape from the ‘Goldcookerhouse’ and saved their bacon.” (from: ‘Die Asiatischen Brüder in Berlin und Wien`, Latomia 22 (1863), transl. by Frater Acher)

So what is it that makes this short-lived order stand out from the crowd of other secret societies of its time? Why has it been hailed - rightly or wrongly so - to be one of the critical forerunners of the Golden Dawn and many its descendants - as well as to be an influential force on so many of our ancestors such as Eliphas Levi, Papus, P.B. Randolph, Frederick Hockley or Kenneth R. H. Mackenzie?

Well, the answer is mainly down to two men. However, we are not talking about the founder of the order, HHEE, nor any of its prominent members during its short time of existence. Instead it were two men that most of us have never heard of and even academic history had almost forgotten about. One of them was baron Franz Thomas von Schönfeld - an adventurer and nobleman whose born name he kept secret to most. Because knowing him under his real name, Moses Dobruška would have given away a lot - not only about his Jewish ancestry but also about his particularly heretic believes.

In order to understand this we have to go back a little further… Like it or not: If you want to stop tell yourself stories or listen to other people's, there is no way we can avoid some proper research into historic facts. As we continue I'll do my best to provide academic sources and quotes for everything I am sharing - just to ensure this doesn't turn into another 'mythical story' of our occult origins. So before we can better understand the impact and story of the 'Asiatic Brethren' let's diverge and take a look at what currents and traditions influenced the emergence of this order in turn. In fact, as a starting point we should aim to understand some very rough outlines of the heretic tradition in Judaism.

II.a Excursus - Sabbatianism
Sabbatai Zevi as the crowned Messiah (Amsterdam, 1666)

Here is how a short version of the official (Wikipedia) story sounds: Sabbatai Zevi (1626-1676) declared himself the new Messiah early on during his education as a Rabbi. In order to prove his divine status to his followers he pulled quite a few eccentric, yet effective publicity stunts: such as pronouncing the holy tetragrammaton in public, officially marrying the Torah and later on wedding Sarah, a young Polish prostitute who proclaimed she would be married by the Messiah. However, different to most other self-proclaimed ‘new messiah’ that we know of, Sabbatai’s influence already spread and extended significantly during his life-time. Despite being banished by local rabbis several times and causing shock and outrage amongst orthodox Jewish leaders, he and his charismatic wife gained a large following and eventually established their power-base in Smyrna. From their his influence grew further and quickly spread all across Europe.

So far the general version. And here is what we don't learn unless we dig a little deeper: In his amazingly detailed biography ‘Sabbatai Zwi - The mystical Messiah’ Gershom Sholem puts forward many proving points to his argument that Sabbatai actually was psychologically ill, i.e. that he suffered from strong manic-depression throughout his life. Rather than being ‘publicity stunts’ or attempts to prove his divine status to his followers, Sholem argues, his paradox and hugely provocative acts should be interpreted in light of this specific mental condition. In fact some of his followers realised his condition as a sickness, yet perceived it as a divine gift and further prove of his special status as a mediator between man and godhead (Scholem 1980, p.319).

Sabbatai Zevi (1666)

Thus Sabbatai turned into a prominent example of Jewish antinomianism and coined the related term of ‘Ma’assim sarim’ (strange or paradox deeds) amongst his followers. While being a student of theoretical Kabbala of average quality at best, Sabbatai’s real impact and charisma stemmed from the ‘divine acts’ which he performed - often just after emerging from the dark night of depression or after having sung psalms for hours in a seeming state of emotional ecstasy. As shocking as they were, Sabbatai proclaimed, that the meaning of these paradox acts was obvious to him while he was in ecstasy and utterly inaccessible and heretic even to himself once he had returned to his normal state of being.

“Large sections of the Jewish people gave themselves over to highly eccentric penances, of which contemporaries said that ‘never something like this had ever been before and never ever will be something like this again, until the true redeemer appears.’” (Scholem 1980, p.316, transl. by Frater Acher)

After a very eventful life - as one would expect given the short outline above - Sabbatai ended up in imprisonment under the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed IV. The Sultan gave him three choices: (1) to subject himself to trial of his divinity (if the arrows of the Sultan’s archers would miss him, his divine status would be proven), (2) to be impaled or (3) to convert to Islam. On the next day, September 16, 1666 Sabbatai “came before the sultan, cast off his Jewish garb and put a Turkish turban on his head. Thus his conversion to Islam was accomplished.” (source).

While Sabbatai’s conversion caused dismay amongst many of his followers and invited ridicule from others, still about 300 of his disciples as well as his wife Sarah converted to Islam as well. Since then a small group of followers is said to have continued to keep Sabbatai’s teachings and heritage alive; the Dönmeh being the most popular ones amongst them. The legend further goes that Sabbatai actually never dropped his heretic believes - yet that he chose his conversion to Islam as a disguise which would allow him to continue to teach and spread his cult in secrecy, while officially being protected through his new Islamic affiliation. Thus for the follower’s who held this belief, converting to a foreign and publicly accepted faith such as Islam or Christianity - once perceived to be one of the most significant sins possible for Jews - actually turned into an expression of their true and secret faith… Only in light of this can we understand what Sabbateans meant when even after their conversion to another faith they continued to call each other ‘Ma’aminim’ (believers). They didn’t emphasise their commitment to their newly gained religion, but to the divine mission of their original messiah, Sabbatai Zevi (Scholem 1980, p.332).

Nathan of Gaza (1667)

What we have not mentioned so far in this hugely abbreviated overview on Sabbatianism is what actually turned the deeds of this originally little known sinner, mystic and ascetic from Smyrna into the most prominent and long-lasting Jewish heretic movement ever since. The reason are the writings of his self-proclaimed prophet, Nathan of Gaza. Only through the latter’s mystical interpretations of Sabbatai’s situation and heretic deeds did the story of this new messiah gain the mystical depth, the spiritual weight and kabbalistic meaning that created the necessary gravitas to turn it into such a strong movement. In fact it is Nathan of Gaza’s peculiar mix of Lurianic Kabbalah, qlippothic-gnostic interpretation, quotes from the Zohar and his own mystic exegesis that - as we will see - should turn Sabbatianism into a future, hidden cornerstone of our Western occult lore (Scholem, p.328).

Now, before we conclude this first excursus let's look at a short, yet critical example of Nathan’s particular explanation of Lurianic Kabbalah. We can find it in his small ‘Treatise of the Dragons’ (Drusch ha-Tanninim, ref. Scholem 1980, p.325f / Scholem 1992, p.317f).

"Lurianic Kabbalah creates the background for the Sabbatean movement. The attempt to give a short overview of its main elements (...) bears the risk of errors and misunderstandings. One has to take it in order to adequately explain the origins and later development of the Sabatean movement." (Scholem 1992, p.49)

One of the most essential elements of Lurianic Kabbalah is a term called ‘tikkun’ or ‘tikkun olam’ (repairing the world). Luria’s idea was that when the first divine light pierced into the void that G'd had withdrawn from to make space for his creation a kind of cosmic accident happened (schebira). The particular accident happened when the light began to fill the fifth sephira of geburah (strength); the related type of light was too strong and overwhelming for the vessel it poured into and thus broke the cosmic vessel. The shells of the vessel dropped into the vast, dark ground of the void.

However, some sparks of divine light stuck to them just like drops of oil stick to potsherd. After the cosmic creation had been recovered by use of an incredibly complex process of restoration (parzufim), these animated ‘shells of clay’ remained at the bottom of the new creation, causing dismay and all evil among living creatures. Man’s role in creation thus was to collect the invisible pearls of divine light from every broken fragment of the original fifth vessel. These fragments could hide anywhere; in fact many Kabbalists began to assume all of the created physical world as an expression of these qlippothic shells. Now, the act through which man could ‘repair the world’ is to treat everything s/he encounters with empathy, devotion and respect. And this is what Lurianic Kabbalists came to know as tikkun. It is the reason why everyone of us exists, it is what we and in particular the Jewish people are here for: the picking up of divine sparks from amongst the darkness of qlippothic shells (Scholem 1992, p.60). A process that will only end with the advent of the new messiah.

"(...) And when the potsherd sunk to the bottom of the (fourth and last) world of asija they originated the four elements - fire, air, water and earth - which in turn brought forth the four stages of mineral, vegetable, animal and human form. Once these had been fully materialised some sparks still remained amongst the elements. Which is why it should be the purpose of any Jew to gather these sparks from where they are trapped into and to resurrect them through the power of their soul to holiness." (Israel Sarug, a famous Lurianic Kabbalist, quoted after Scholem 1992, p.61, transl. by Frater Acher)

So far the highly abbreviated, yet original Lurianic teaching on tikkun for absolute dummies.

In his treatise of the dragons Nathan expands this interpretation in a way that would allow him later on to explain the behaviour of the new messiah, Sabbatai, in deeply mystical and kabbalistic terms. According to Nathan of Gaza the qlippothic forces already came into existence when G'd originally withdrew into itself (zimzum) to create a void that could be filled with creation. In fact the entire void was filled with such hylic, formless powers as well as at the same time with powers that strove towards creation. Creation thus was a process of constant forming, bonding and integration of these qlippothic forces into the newly formed worlds (Scholem 1992, p.320f). When the divine light shattered the fifth vessel and collapsed into the abyss, what fell into the dark amongst these sparks of light was also the soul of the messiah itself (Davidowicz, p.117). This is why, according to the Sabbateans, since the beginning of the world the soul of the messiah is locked into a cave of darkness. And together with it in this darkest of places dwell the qlippothic snakes or dragons that were contained outside of creation who plague and torture the messiah’s soul.

This kabbalistic re-interpretation gains further meaning when Nathan refers to the messiah’s soul as a ‘holy snake' amongst snakes (Scholem 1992, p.327) - as the hebrew word for snake (nachash) has the same numeric value as the term messiah. Each act of tikkun thus not only becomes an act of repairing the world, but takes further meaning in that it also refers to a cleaning and restoring of the messiah’s soul itself. (Note: This earliest Sabbatean myth which puts the snake (dragon) into the middle of its messianic teaching shows interesting parallels to the gnostic teachings of the Ophites.)

"The earlier referenced soul (of the messiah) which had sunken amongst the qlippoth sent out sparks into each generation. If they proved worthy and the respective spark proved to be of value in service of the Lord, then eventually it could turn into the soul of the messiah and pull out its entire root of his (holy) soul from amongst the qlippoth. This is also how AMIRAH (Sabbatai Zevi) originally emerged as a spark of this root from amongst the qlippoth; yet in his struggle he pulled out the entire root. Hence the Lord, once he had pulled out the entire root and turned into messiah, led him into great temptation. (...) Because these snakes always aimed to beguile him, and always after he had struggled to pull out great holiness from the qlippoth, they managed to take power over him once the state of enlightenment had withdrawn from him. Then they would show him that they also possessed great powers..." (from a letter by Nathan of Gaza, quoted after Scholem 1992, p.329/p.156, transl. Frater Acher)

Now, earlier I referred to the significance of Sabbatean Kabbala to our Western occult lore. Having examined the re-interpretation of the originally Lurianic term tikkun we are now at a point where we can better understand one of the main reasons for its longstanding impact on our own tradition: It was the Sabbatean interpretation of Salvation that made all the difference. Suddenly the idea of salvation first and foremost didn’t refer anymore to the exoteric redemption of the Jewish people from slavery amongst other people. Instead it pointed to an inner salvation, an esoteric process of mystical healing and restoration of one’s own soul (Scholem 1980, p.334).

Thus it is in Sabbatianism that we find the central myth of Kabbalah retold: From an exploration of the process through which the Jewish kingdom would be restored, its central concern changed into a mystical path that would lead to a radical change and sublimation of substance. Both, the substance of all worlds created as well as the substance of the human soul.

: : continue with the 2nd part : :

Aleida Assmann, Erinnerungsräume: Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses, C.H. Beck 1999
Wouter Haanegraaff, Dictionary of Gnosis & Western Esotericism, Brill Academic Publishing 2006
Karl R.H. Frick, Die Erleuchteten - Gnostisch theosophische und alchemistisch rosenkreuzerische Geheimgesellschaften bis zum Ende des 18.Jahrhunderts, Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt 1973
Jacob Katz, Der Orden der Asiatischen Brüder, in: Freimaurer und Geheimbünde im 18.Jahrhundert in Mitteleuropa, Suhrkamp 1983
Gershom Scholem, Ein verschollener jüdischer Mystiker der Aufklärungszeit: E. J. Hirschfeld, in: Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook 1962
Gershom Scholem, Die jüdische Mystik in ihren Hauptströmungen, Suhrkamp 1980
Gershom Scholem, Sabbatai Zwi - Der mystische Messias, Jüdischer Verlag 1992
Klaus Davidowicz, Die Kabbala - Eine Einführung in die Welt der jüdischen Mystik und Magie, böhlau 20


On the Order of
the Asiatic Brethren
So here we are - having returned safely from our excursions into Sabbatianism and Frankism. Maybe let’s pause for a moment and reflect. Considering everything we learned about these two heretical currents within Jewry, let’s look at a simple question: If the teachings of any secret society or magical order had been heavily influenced by either or both of them, through which characteristics could we recognise such influence?

In essence: what would be the marks on any occult order that would allow us to assume a strong influence of Sabbatianism or Frankism respectively? Well, here is a short overview and with that a brief summary of what we discussed during Part 1 and 2:

Overview of characteristic features of Sabbatianism and Frankism - click to enlarge

Now, if for a moment we broadened our view to look beyond the order of the Asiatic Brethren, we might already be able to see how significant the heritage of these currents is on our modern day occult tradition? Take a moment to compare many of the practices and rituals in modern occult movements or even in Crowley’s own work with the above list?

The most stunning resemblance - in terms of its sexual affinity as well as its emphasise on turning spirit into flesh - I can think of are the works of Austin Osamn Spare, a genuine wunderkind of 20th century magic. Allow me to share a quote from his Logomachy of Zos might highlight this strange connection:

All ways to Heaven lead to flesh. Our re-orientation and ascent from Earth must start here: nothing is obtained except by desire and our only medium is flesh—mouth and hand. (…) No escape but to breathe the human smell, touch the hirsute flesh: shall again adventure… must transgress. (…) Flesh exists to be exploited. It is in all things and all things will be through it. All emanations are through the flesh and nothing has reality for us without it. The Soul is ever unknowable because we can only realize by finite form in Time-Space. (…) This is your great moment of reality—the living flesh! — AOS, The Logomachy of Zos

4. On the Founding Fathers of the Asiatic Brethren
With this let's return to the order of the Asiatic Brethren and begin to identify their actual origins and teachings. In doing so we will concentrate on three main aspects. The first of which will be the focus of this current chapter:

Origins: Who were the most influential founding members of the order?

Teachings: What were the actual teachings of the order as we know them today?

Sources: Which trusted sources do we know influenced the orders’ teachings?

We already introduced two of the leading men of the order during the first chapter, Hans Heinrich von Ecker und Eckhofen (HHEE) as well as Franz Thomas von Schönfeld. However, when we compare the various, scattered contemporary German sources that have come upon us as well as more recent research on the order, several other important members stand out. The below chart provides an condensed overview of the five most influential members of the Asiatic Brethren (AB) - legendary or authentic (ref. Katz 1983 / von Goue, 1805).

Founding Fathers of the Asiatic Brethren - click to enlarge

Now, it needs to be called out that by no means were these five men also the most powerful members of the order. Quite the opposite: most of them had lost much of their wealth and social power before joining (Katz, p.241). Still, quickly after the foundation of the order these men were able to attract a significant amount of followers in various European power centres of the time. This is an even greater accomplishment if we recognise that the order throughout its relatively short life-time always remained isolated from other and more established Freemasons’ organisations. Lodges of the Asiatic Brethren have been confirmed for Vienna - where their original headquarter was - Prague, Hamburg, Berlin, Frankfurt and Innsbruck. Equally, due to member lists found amongst the order’s papers memberships of several powerful potentates of the time are confirmed, the most influential of whom certainly was the future King of Prussia, Friedrich Wilhelm II (Katz, p.253).

This order has spread from Italy to Russia already. The ruling heads of this order were unknown still at 1788; however it is not unlikely that the baron von Ecker und Eckhofen is one of them. They refer to Masonry as their basis, they even call it the nursery (Pflanzschule) of their entire system. Their gatherings they call Melchisedek-Lodges and offer their services to include Jews, Turks, Persians and Armenians. The order aims to be a fraternal association of all righteous and (currently) separated human children. (…) The order’s teaching are partly moral, which means one is taught how to govern the spirits by breaking the seven seals, and partly physical, which means one is taught how to produce miracle cures (Wunderarzneyen) and how to create gold. The order expects blind faith and blind obedience; it’s regulations are the true teachings of the son’s of Loyola. — von Goue, Leipzig 1805, p.411

Like any good occult order the AB strived to provide a founding myth leading back into an ancient lineage. This was particularly important as the order had been established without any support from either the side of other Freemasons’ nor Rosicrucian organisations of the time.

Moreover, as we see highlighted in the order’s name, the aim was to establish a particularly strong connection to Asian occult traditions. The term ‘Asia’ in this context, however, needs explanation: It is not a reference to the landmass we have come to call Asia today. Yet instead it is a vague reference to Asia-Minor at best. Thus it indicates a tradition that doesn’t stem from the European mainland, but from the Orient instead. Secondly, the term aimed to function as a name-tag which in the 18th century marked a tradition that was equally - or possibly more - ancient than the established Roman Catholic and Jewish orthodoxy.

“The Asiatic Brethren would like so much, just like any fraternity seems to be marked by this weakness, to be of ancient decent.”
— VON GOUE, LEIPZIG 1805, P.420
The plot of the Asiatic Brethren’s founding myth is relatively straight forward: According to the order the original teachings were passed on to them by a Franciscan monk called Justus. His born second name was believed to be Bischoff (engl: bishop), a common German name indicating ancient religious ties of a family. Justus had spent several years living in the Orient, in Jerusalem in particular. Here he came into contact with kabbalistic circles, began to immerse himself deeply into the study of their teachings and ultimately managed to receive original manuscripts from these circles. It is on this material that much of the order’s ceremony and teaching were built and expanded later on.

As part of their foundation myth they also remembered the name of the kabbalistic teacher from whom Justus had received the original material. His name was Azariah and he was said to be a member of a kabbalistic sect himself, possibly of Sabbatean origins. Due to his strong devotion to Kabbalah he handed over management of his daily business to his sons and became an emissary of the sect, traveling from city to city to expand and strengthen the sect’s network. This is how he got to know Justus and despite the latter’s European and more importantly Christian background began to unveil the teachings of the Kabbalah to him (Katz, p.241f). — Of course not all of these details can be verified today. However, historic evidence of the person of Justus are sufficiently strong to erase most doubt about his existence (Katz, p.242 / von Goue, Leipzig 1805, p.419).

We will not repeat here what we have said in the first chapter about the Bavarian officer, Hans Heinrich von Ecker und Eckhoffen and how he founded the actual order in 1781. However, it should be highlighted here that Ecker himself explained he had been introduced to the order in 1774 by a friend, Georg Hasting. According to the former at this point the order had already been established for 38 years in a loose form after some of the original brethren had decided to move to Europe (Frick, p.457). -- We will also not repeat again the background of Franz Thomas von Schönfeld who contributed as a founding member of the order and developed much of its constitutional teachings, structure and ceremony (Katz, p.248). As far as we can tell, it was down to the work of this original triumvirate that the basic and distinct tenet of the AB were shaped and designed. We will take a closer look at them in the next chapters. Before that, however, there is one more founding father of the order we need to go get to know. His name is Ephraim Joseph Hirschfeld.

It is with Hirschfeld that we encounter the true prodigy who helped to elevate the AB above the crowd of other mystical orders and secret societies of the time. In his liminal essay from 1962 Gershom Scholem was the first one to rediscover this ‘forgotten mystic of the age of enlightenment`. Unfortunately as Scholem died briefly after publishing this essay he never was given the chance to finish his planned book on Hirschfeld (Davidowicz, p.135). However, in a nutshell here is what we know about him and his influence on the AB:

Hirschfeld was born as a son to a Jewish cantor in Karlsruhe who held considerable knowledge in talmudic and kabbalistic studies (Katz, p.245). It was also Hirschfeld’s father who already had aimed to create and strengthen his family ties to several Christian families of noble decent. As a protege of these powerful allies the young Hirschfeld was allowed to visit a higher school and study medicine initially.

(…) Instead he acquired primary knowledge in languages, philosophy and literature and achieved a level of self-confidence on the social parquet which was unusual for Jews at that time. In addition to his acquired skills Hirschfeld had some strange inherent features: on the one hand he tended to reclusive behaviour and stay by himself, where on the other hand he shone in every kind of public conversation, radiated charm and self-confidence and steadily advocated his well thought through opinions. — Katz, p.246

Early on in his life we find him working as a teacher and accountant for several aristocratic families, such as ultimately the famous 19th century banker David Friedländer. In 1782 Hirschfeld relocated to Innsbruck where his momentous encounter with the founder of the AB, Hans Heinrich von Ecker und Eckhoffen (HHEE) took place. The two of them quickly formed strong bonds and became close friends, repeatedly traveling together across Germany and Austria on the quest to spread their new-formed order. Contemporary sources actually called them“a pair of originals who ran the risk of mutually ruining each other.” (Davidowicz, p.139)

Different to many other Jews of the time who aimed for access to Christian secret societies and a place on the social parquet, Hirschfeld never converted to Christianity and always held on to his Jewish roots. Still after receiving permission to join the order of the Asiatic Brethren, it was him who gradually took over the work of Franz Thomas von Schönfeld and - as we will see - began to put his kabbalistic mark especially on the teaching of the higher grades of the order.

Ephraim Joseph Hirschfeld, a Jewish Kabbalist and Freemason, is one of the figures towards the end of the 18th century in whose works we can equally find traces of Kant as well as of kabbalistic elements of one Isaac Luria. It is through him that we can see how Sabbatean and Frankist bodies of thought (…) lead to the upheaval from tradition to modernity in the minds of many thinkers of his time. — Davidowicz, p.135

Surprisingly, in 1790 we find Hirschfeld being banned from the order. The reasons for this event remain somewhat in the dark due to papers relating to a law court that only have been rediscovered partially so far (Davidowicz, p.146). However, it seems relatively proven that the root causes for both his eventual exclusion from the order as well as his temporary imprisonment were public conflicts with his former close friend and ally, HHEE himself. The conflict seemed to revolve around two main aspects: (1) unfulfilled financial promises towards Hirschfeld as well as (2) a lack of respect for his work and increasing discrimination due to his Jewish background.

Now, what is particularly interesting about this conflict is Hirschfeld’s opinion on Kabbala as he expressed it in public documents as part of the related law court. He argues very confidently that Kabbala as such was not based on any particular religion, but rather formed an open path for anybody interested - be they Muslim, Catholic or Jewish - to transcend the limitations of one's own religious tradition and to gain access to “the one and only, true, pure and all embracing religion.” (Katz, p.267)

But because it is in the principles of the true Cabalistic that lies the one and only, true, pure and all-embracing religion, nothing is more natural than that all kinds of religious members are coming together here (in this order). It is here for example that the orthodox Jew, Mohametan and Christian learned the sacred three-in-one as well as the true faith in the unbiased doctrine of Christ - of which the first two mustn’t know and the third downrightly knows nothing (…). — Ephraim Josef Hirschfeld, quoted after Katz, p.281

Now, let’s pause for a moment and consider why this is such a significant quote for our Western tradition? Well, most of the mystical orders founded in the 19th and early 20th century that form our more recent mystical heritage were deeply syncretic by nature. While several of them maintained a relatively Christian facade, their teachings converged in so far as they assumed one true source of divine wisdom and teaching which was located beyond the confines of any particular religion. This is why Eliphas Levi, Papus, Mathers, etc. were obsessed with ‘piecing the puzzle’ together and felt at liberty to take elements of traditions from all cultures and histories of our past to unblock their magical paths. Pragmatic syncretism was the perceived key to ‘reconstruct’ (or invent?) entire systems of magic and bring them to life again.

It is in light of this that the work of Ephraim Josef Hirschfeld assumes its most important meaning: At the turn of the 19th century we find a kabbalistic Jew becoming one of the earliest pioneers of this occult spirit. While Western society was obsessed with the rational mind and pushing through the barriers of the past into the new Age of Enlightenment, at the same time we discover in Hirschfeld the emergence of a current that used this momentum to pave its way into a completely different direction. ‘Enlightenment’ for Hirschfeld was to recognise the false and artificial limitations each religious tradition confined itself to. ‘Enlightenment’ for him meant to break free from all of these man-made containers altogether - and to push through to the actual, unifying mystical truth behind each of these belief systems.

cover page of the first book that contained an official history of the AB, Leipzig 1805, published anonymously by August Siegfried von Goue - click to enlarge

That this spiritual attempt obviously was flawed again in itself should not diminish its general accomplishment. Not everything in Kabbala will still work and function if you take away the Jewish context and current underneath it; not everything in the teachings of Paracelsus, Jacob Böhme or Ignatius of Loyola will still be coherent and touch your soul, if you a deviate too far from the paths each of them had carved out. In fact, much of magic, mystic and the occult simply will become muddy and all mixed up if you think you can hold their essences in your hands without accepting the particular vessels they were taken from. However - and this is the significant thing to remember - at the time Hirschfeld introduced his revolutionary ideas into the higher grades of the Asiatic Brethren most of the liquid essence had been lost over the adoration of the man-made vessels.

But let's return to our almost forgotten founding father. In 1792 we find Hirschfeld imprisoned in Schleswig, excluded from the AB and deprived not only of the fruits of his work but more importantly even of the public recognition. The aristocratic potentates who protected him for most of his life had either died of age or turned away from him.

Suddenly, historic documents tell us, one Isaac ben Joseph, a leading head of the order appears in the city where Hirschfeld is held captive. The order’s brethren in the area who had heard about ben Joseph in the past, believed him to be another of their legendary founders rather than a real person - and so were shocked to see him alive. ben Joseph meets the authorities who had ordered the imprisonment of Hirschfeld, pays the significant amount of 550 thaler to free him of his asserted debts and gets him released from prison. Together they leave Schleswig and neither of them should ever return.

In May of the same year both of them reappear in Strasbourg where they depart. Hirschfeld returns to Germany and his home city of Karlsruhe. Until the end of his life this is where he resides; as well as in Offenbach very close to the court of Jacob Frank. Hirschfeld continues on his life’s mission and in 1796 publishes the first Jewish-Kabbalistic book in German language ever, 'Biblisches Organon oder Realübersetzung der Bibel mit der mystischen Begleitung und kritischen Anmerkungen'. It remains one of the rarest German language occult books until today.

However, above all Hirschfeld never stopped waiting for his brethren to keep their promise - and to allow him to return to his order. When the news reached him that most of the lodges of the order had ceased to exist, he even took efforts to re-establish it himself. He remained without success and died in 1820.

Which leaves us with one last question. Who was the mysterious brother who appeared out of nowhere when Hirschfeld was imprisoned in Schleswig? Well, it seems Hirschfeld after all wasn’t without any allies from his former order. Isaac ben Joseph was just another name Franz Thomas von Schönfeld assumed while traveling from one adventure to the next all across Europe. Hirschfeld and Schönfeld - the two authentic kabbalistic scholars within the AB - first had been rivals within the order, both aiming to establish their authority and control over the order’s teachings. At that time Schönfeld succumbed, Hirschfeld prevailed and the former had to leave the order. What drove Schönfeld years later to support his former contender, to pay for him and to travel together with him subsequently, is what we do not know.

We do know, however, that together in Strasbourg they finally got to meet another mystic whose work had a strong influence on both of them and therefore on teachings of the AB. This was the 'unknown philosopher' and disciple of one famous Martinez de Pasqually, Louis Claude de Saint-Martin. But I guess we are getting into another adventure already. Enough for now.

Let’s save the secrets of Pasqually and St.Martin and how they influenced the order of the Asiatic Brethren for our next chapter.

The syncretic tendencies of the ‘Asiatic Brethren’ who aimed to unite Jewry and Christianity by all means resembled the related tendencies amongst the Frankists, who leveraged writings from these circles, such as Hirschfelds ‘Biblical Organon’ (Offenbach 1796) for their propaganda. It is on this soil that Schönfeld and Hirschfeld met. What attracted the Frankist Schönfeld to the Freemason Hirscheld was what attracted the Freemason Hirschfeld to the Frankists with whom he maintained the closes relationships later on in Offenbach. — Gershom Scholem, quoted after Katz, p.14


Weishaupt and Rothschild
Our question today is, how closely allied was Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Bavarian Illuminati, to the Rothschild bankers? Most of the sources we have found on this subject agree that the Rothschilds funded Weishaupt, who was only one of many leaders of the Illuminati.

“The premise of universal domination found in the Law by the orthodox Jew was not interpreted by the Pharisees in the sense of the reign of the God of Moses over the Nations, but in the sense of a material domination which would be imposed by the Jews over the Universe. The expected Messiah…was to be a temporal King, all bloody from battle, who would make Israel master of the world and trample all peoples under the wheel of His chariot.”

“But he (Adam Weishaupt) was not the first Illuminati, he has merely been the most obvious, and the Learned Elders of Zion, the Jewish Sanhedrin has allowed the world to believe it was Adam Weishaupt who founded the Secret Society, thus keeping themselves behind the scenes and out of sight of the peoples of the world!”

“By means of these the mentality of the Western world has been for long and still is being Judaised in all departments of life, producing Socialism, Communism, and Bolshevism, which if successful would inevitably lead to Jewish domination and the destruction of Western and Christian civilization.”


“The Rothschilds had played a major role in the Bavarian Illuminati, (25) and it is known that a least one of the sons of Amsel was a member. As the reader remembers, Amsel placed his sons in the major European capitals, where they each set up the principal banking houses. By their own secret intelligence service and their own news network they could outmanouver any European government. (26) The large amounts of voluminous correspondence by Rothschild couriers attracted attention, (27) but no one ever stopped their personal intelligence and mail services. After the Bavarian illuminati were exposed, the central occult power over the European secret societies shifted to Carbonarism a.k.a. the Alta Vendita, (28) led by another powerful Rothschild, Karl Rothschild, (29) son of Amschel. In 1818, Karl participated in a secret document that was sent out to the headquarters of Masonry from the Alta Vendita.

“The Jewish Ency. Vol. 2, p. 496 indicates other Jewish families “adopted the Rothschild plan.” These were the Lazards, Sterns, Speyers, and Seligmans. The Rothschild plan was to place family members in the 5 largest European capitals to coordinate their activities. One of Germany’s largest magazines is the Stern, and Ernst Stern is second-in-command of the World Bank.” (53)

“The Jewish families that established the Frankfurt Judenloge (this was the Masonic lodge the Rothschilds belonged to in Frankfurt) included the Adlers, Speyers, Reisses, Sichels, Ellisons, Hanaus, Geisenheimers, and Goldschmidts. Isaac Hildesheim, a Jew who changed his name to Justus Hiller is credited as being the founder of this Frankfurt lodge. Michael Hess, principal of the Reformed Jewish school Philanthropin was an important figure in the lodge too, as was Dr. Ludwig Baruch (later Borne) who joined in 1808.

“Most of these Frankfurt Jewish Freemasons engaged in commerce. (54) Those Freemasons from 1817-1842 were the leaders of the Frankfurt Jewish community. (55) A gentile Mason in Frankfurt Johann Christian Ehrmann began warning the German people that the Frankfurt Jewish Masons wanted a world republic based on humanism. In 1816 he came out with a warning pamphlet Das Judenthum in der M[aurere]y (The Jews in Masonry). A powerful ally of the world’s jewry can be seen beginning with men like Oliver Cromwell, who was considered a Mason.

“The following quote by one of Nathan’s contemporaries describes his eerie countenance: ‘Eyes are usually called windows of the soul. But in Rothschild’s case you would conclude that the windows are false ones, or that there was no soul to look out them. There comes not one pencil of light from the interior, neither is there any gleam of that which comes from without reflected in any direction. The whole puts you in mind of an empty skin, and you wonder why it stands upright without at least something in it. By and by another figure comes up to it. It then steps two paces aside, and the most inquisitive glance that you ever saw, and a glance more inquisitive than you would have thought of, is drawn out of the fixed and leaden eyes, as if one were drawing a sword from a scabbard…”


“…the Jewish Cabalistic leaders were able to establish a control over all world banking through the Rothschild family, and…the political power was captured through the work of Adam Weishaupt. Here is how it was done: Meyer Amschel (a rabbinically trained German Jew who later took the name Rothschild) was firmly established in the German city, Frankfurt am Main, with an emerging banking house as early as 1764. The leader of the Cabala at that time, Jakob Frank (a Polish born Jew with the family name of Leibowicz) lived in the German city of Offenbach (just south of the city of Frankfurt) from 1773. Johann Adam Weishaupt (from a Jewish family that had converted to the Roman Catholic Church) was at Ingolstadt in 1770, a German city in Bavaria. With these three men, the stage was set to ignite a hell fire that would forever bring changes to the world.

“At this point in time, it is not known who ‘supervised’ these three Jewish men, but it is obvious that someone directed their efforts. On May 1, 1776, just two months before the Declaration of Independence in America, the Order of Illuminati was founded by Weishaupt. At this time Weishaupt was 28 years old, Amschel was 32 years old and Frank was 50 years old. Meyer Amschel financed Adam Weishaupt and Jakob Frank laid the cabalisic theological foundation for the Order of the Illuminati.” (Ibid.)


The following quoted material is from Juri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, pp. 22-28.

“It was no coincidence that the Order of the Illuminati was founded on the first of May. Among the Cabbalist Jews, this date, 15 (1.5) symbolized the sacred number of Yahweh and became their occult holiday. According to Goethe, the first of May — the day following Walpurgis Night — is when the dark mystical forces are celebrated.

At this time a young Jew named Mayer Amschel (born February 23, 1744) was being tutored to become a rabbi. Amschel lived with his parents in the Jewish ghetto of Frankfurt am Main. He later took the name Rothschild. It was Mayer Amschel Rothschild who convinced Weishaupt to wholly accept the Frankist Cabbalist doctrine and who afterwards financed the Illuminati. Rothschild had given Weishaupt the task of restablishing the old Alumbrado movement for the Cabbalist Jews.

Theoretical Cabbala embraces only secret teachings about God and nature. But practical Cabbala (such as Frankism) attempts to affect earthly matters. It involves the use of amulets and magic numbers as well as the conjuring of evil spirits. Both the Talmud and Midrash contain Cabbalist information. (Ancient Oriental and Jewish Secret Doctrines, Leipzig, 1805.)

Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman shows in his book “To Eliminate the Opiate” (New York, 1974) that there was a clear connection between Frankism and Weishaupt’s Illuminism. The goal of the Frankists was to work in secret to establish Jewish world supremacy. Professor Scholem has clearly documented that they achived extensive political power.

Jakob Frank summed up his doctrine in his book “The Words of the Lord”. He asserted that the creator God was not the same as the one who had revealed himself to the Israelites. He believed God was evil. Frank proclaimed himself the true Messiah. He vowed to not tell the truth, rejected every moral law, and declared that the only way to a new society was through a total destruction of the present civilization. Murder, rape, incest and drinking of blood were perfectly acceptable actions and necessary rituals.

Frank was one of those refractory Jews who worshipped devils. The extremist Jews were particularly fond of a devil called Sammael. (C.M. Ekbohrn, “100000 frammande ord”, Stockholm, 1936, p. 1173.)

In time, the Illuminati won control of every Masonic order in the world. Important financiers joined the organization: Speyer, Schuster, Stern and others. The Jews had therefore gained a very powerful position. Their base of operations was Frankfurt am Main.

The Jesuits had taught Weishaupt much, not least their doubtful morals. He encouraged his closest collaborators to use the lie as a tool and to avoid giving the public any true explanations. The leaders of the Illuminati saw to it that their most dangerous opponents and others who might be a threat to the Order were poisoned. (Gerald B. Winrod, “Adam Weishaupt – A Human Devil.”)

In 1777, the Illuminati began to cooperate with all the Masonic lodges (especially the Grand Orient) in order to infiltrate them. The Duke of Brunswick, Grand Master of Germany, said in 1794 that the Masonic lodges were controlled by the Illuminati. When Weishaupt became a member of the Grand Orient, the lodge was backed financially by Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812), according to the British historian Nesta Webster.

Bernard Lazar, a well-known Jewish author, wrote in his “L’Antisemitisme” in 1894, that exclusively Cabbalist Jews surrounded Weishaupt. Confiscated documents show that of 39 Illuminati holding lesser leading positions, 17 were Jews (i.e., 40%.) The higher one looked in the ranks, the larger was the percentage of Jews. Even the fact that the Illuminati headquarters in Ingolstadt were later converted into a synagogue was symbolic of this conspiracy. Lazar stated that all these Jews became the agents of revolution because they had “revolutionary souls.”

There were four especially important Jews in the Illuminati leadership. Hartwig (Napthali Herz) Wessely, Moses Mendelssohn, the banker Dnaiel von Itzig (1723-1799) and the businessman David Friedlander (La Vielle France, 31st of March, 1921.)

The Illuminati’s codex was presented in Masonic terms and prescribed lies, treachery, violence, torture and murder in order to reach all its goals. Many members believed themselves to be working for an improvement of the world. They never guessed that Weishaupt’s true purpose was to establish Novus Ordo Seclorum, a global program for world domination.

The Protestant princes and rulers in Germany were well disposed to Weishaupt’s official plan to destroy the Catholic Church and they sought membership in his Order. Through these men Weishaupt gained control over the Masonic Orders, into which he and his other Jewish cronies were initiated in 1777. To prevent the rulers from understanding the true aims of the Illuminati, he forestalled their contact with the higher degrees.

…Adam Weishaupt began to work especially closely with the Jewish Masonic leader Moses Mendelssohn (1729-1786). Mendelssohn became, so to speak, Weishaupt’s invisible guide. Moses Mendelssoh was officialy known by the Jews as a poor writer who became one of Germany’s foremost philosophers during the “age of enlightenment.” He called himself a philosopher and a cultural personality. Officially, Mendelssohn’s aim was to “modernize” Judaism so that the public might accept the Jews when they ostensibly gave up Talmudism and “assimilated” to Western culture. The Illuminatus Mirabeau wrote a book in 1787 about Moses Mendelssohn’s political “reforms” to spread even more fantastical myths about him. In secret, however, Mendelssohn encouraged the Jews to faithfully keep their beliefs of their fathers. He led the Illuminati in Berlin.


“Some researchers contend that Adam Wieshaupt of the Bavarian Illuminati was financially supported by the Rothschilds. The Bavarian Illuminati was founded in 1776, and the Rothschilds were not necessarily a financial power at that time. I may be wrong, but I do not believe Mayer was in a financial position to support Wieshaupt. It is possible, though, that when, in 1782, the headquarters of the Illuminati moved to Frankfort, that it began to be controlled by the Rothschilds.

The satanic House of Rothschild’s Illuminati dealings at this time are well exemplified by their involvement with the second Tugenbund League. The first Tugenbund League (or Virtue League) was formed in 1786 as a kind of sex society. The group would meet at Henrietta Herz’s home (her husband was an Illuminati Jew who was the disciple of the powerful occultist Moses Mendelssohn). Many Illuminists attended this “Virtue” League.

A number of young Jewish women whose husbands were always away on business would come to the Herz’s house to participate in the immorality (two members were daughters of Moses Mendelssohn). Frequenters of this salon included revolutionary Freemason Mirabeau, William von Humbolt, and Frederick von Gentz, who was to become an important Rothschild agent. Later on, I will discuss Gentz in further detail. In 1807 the second Tugenbund League was formed. This League pursued “moral-scientific” and political aims. The main aim being the deliverance of Germany from French occupation. The League was formed by Baron von Stein who was its principal “protector.”

Thomas Frost wrote in SECRET SOCIETIES OF THE EUROPEAN REVOLUTION that ‘The Initiations [into the second Tugendbund] multiplied rapidly, and the League soon numbered in its ranks most of the Councilors of State, many officers of the army, and a considerable number of the professors of literature and science…. A central directorate at Berlin, presided over by Stein, had the supreme control of the movement, and exercised, through provincial committees, an authority all the more potent from emanating from an unknown source, and which was obeyed as implicitly as the decrees of Emperor or King.’

The Landgrave William of Hesse-Cassel held an important position in the second Tugendbund. Buderus was also involved. It appears the Rothschilds were members and they were “go-betweens for the [Landgrave’s] correspondence on this matter, and made payments in favor of the Tugendbund.” This put Mayer Rothschild at the head of the propaganda system against Napoleon.

Napoleon tried to suppress Tugundbund but it went underground, concealing itself under the protection of the English Masonic Lodge at Hanover. It assisted many anti-Napoleon causes physically and financially. Tugendbund was eventually dissolved, but many of its members moved on to other Masonic societies such as the “Black Knights,” ‘The Knights of the Queen of Prussia,” and “The Concordists.” In 1818 the second Tugundbund was revived as the Burschenschaft (Association of Boys or Fellows). The Burschenschaft was a revolutionary group of students who introduced martial exercises into the universities. The Burschenschaft eventually fell apart.

There is absolutely no evidence that I have found to connect the first Amschel Rothschild directly with the 1789 Revolution. He most emphatically was not the alter ego of Frederick, Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, as has been stated by a certain author, and never had anything to do with that potentate, at whose palace in Wilhelmsbad the notorious Masonic Congress was held in which Illuminism definitely allied itself to Freemasonry, the Landgrave himself being Grand Master of Bavarian Masonry. This was in 1782, and the headquarters of Illuminised Masonry was set up in Frankfort in the same year. But at that time, Amschel Rothschild had no considerable influence even with Frederick’s son, and none at all with the Landgrave himself.

There was, however, an organisation formed at Berlin called the League of Virtue or Tugenbund, which was, in the words of the Special Commissioner of Police at Mayence “so identified with the Illuminati that no line of demarcation was seen between them” (1814, Archives Nationales F 7/6563). The headquarters of the Tugenbund were at the house of a Jewish member of the Illuminati, Herz, friend and pupil of Moses Mendelssohn, the Jewish “intellectual” revolutionary; Herz’s wife, Henrietta, usually presided at the gatherings. Among its adherents were two of Mendelssohn’s daughters, who had two brothers married to members of the family of the Jew Daniel Itzig; Mirabeau, who according to Graetz’s History of the Jews, Vol. V., was more often in Mrs. Herz’s company than her husband, and who introduced Illuminism into France and initiated the Duke of Orleans and Talleyrand into the order (F, Vol. I., p. 374); Fanny von Arnstein, daughter of Daniel Itzig, who ran a similar salon in Vienna; William von Humboldt, who later became Prussian Ambassador in London, and his brother, the explorer Alexander von Humboldt who learned Hebrew from Mrs. Herz. But the most prominent member of the Tugenbund was Frederick von Gentz, a crypto-Jew “intellectual” quite unburdened by any morals, who later became secretary to Prince Metternich, Chancellor of Austria.

We have it on the authority of the Jewish Chronicle, 1st Sept., 1922, that Mrs. Herz herself said that the Tugenbund Jews were ardent supporters of the French Revolution.

Now, although Amschel the first cannot be incriminated as supporting the Illuminati, it is a striking fact that members of his family had the closest relations with some of the above mentioned members of the Tugenbund.

It was von Gentz to whom the Rothschilds owed their later position with Prince Metternich of Austria (A, Vol. II., p. 619), although the first meeting between one of Amschel’s sons and von Gentz did not take place until 1818. It is noteworthy that William von Humboldt’s estates were managed by Amschel Rothschild II in 1830, whilst as early as 1818 Alexander von Humboldt was, with his brother, in intimate social relationship with Nathan Rothschild in London (A, Vol. I., p. 215). It is simply impossible to believe that the five Rothschild sons were not secretly supporting the Revolutionary cause in France through the first half of the nineteenth century.

Fortunately, however, we have a decisive piece of evidence which puts the matter beyond dispute. It will be noted that Solomon Rothschild was not sent permanently to Vienna until 1816, when he was 42 years of age. Before that, he was assisting his father at Frankfort. Here, at a date not known but previous to 1814 and probably in his father’s lifetime, although that is uncertain, he became a member of a Grand Orient Lodge of Freemasons called L’Aurore Naissante; this is shown in a report of the Director of Police at Graetz. (Reference Les Dessous du Congres de Vienna, by Commandant M. H. Weil, published by Libraire Payot in 1917, which, in turn obtained its data from original documents of the Ministry of Interior, Vienna, the reference being pp. 419 and 420, Vienna, 6th Nov., 1814, F, 34468 and 3565). This Lodge was later taken over by the United Grand Lodge of England, a curious fact, but one which does not concern us here, since the transfer did not take place until 1817 (History of Freemasonry, by R. F. Gould, Vol. III., p.p. 236/7).

It is also to be noted that the Montefiore family, which is so closely intermarried with the Rothschilds, is also connected by marriage with the Goldsmids, whose forebears Benjamin and Abraham are mentioned above as Jew financiers of the French Revolution, and that the sister of another of these, Moses Mocatta, was mother of Sir Moses Montefiore who became jackal to the London Rothschild House.

In 1807, another Tugenbund was formed, apparently with the genuine political object of uniting Germany against Napoleon; Amschel Rothschild had very close relations with it and “the Rothschilds appear to have become members” (A, Vol. I., p. 81). William of Hesse-Cassel was an important member and the Rothschilds acted as go-betweens for his correspondence concerning it and made payments in favour of the Tugenbund.”


The following quoted material is from “The Illuminati”

“According to Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman, in To Eliminate the Opiate, it was the founder of the Rothschild dynasty who convinced Weishaupt to accept the Frankist doctrine, and who afterwards financed the Illuminati, with the aim of fulfilling the Frankist plot of subverting the world’s religions, or the Kabbalah’s Zionist objective of instituting a global government to be ruled by the expected Messiah.[9]

In 1773, Mayer Rothschild had invited twelve other wealthy and influential men, representing in all the thirteen bloodlines of the Illuminati, to convince them to pool their resources in a plot to bring about a new world order. Thus was Adam Weishaupt commissioned to establish the Illuminati. Though born Jewish, as a young boy, Weishaupt was educated by the Jesuits. On May 1, 1776, three years after the Jesuit order was disbanded by the Church, Weishaupt announced the foundation of the Order of Perfectibilists, which later became more widely known as the Illuminati.

About eight years before the Revolution, Orleans was elected Grand Master of France, and the whole association of various lodges came to be known as the Grand Orient. The chief instigators of the Revolution, Mirabeau, Condorcet, Rochefoucault and others, were high-ranking officers of these lodges. The Count Mirabeau was himself a member of the Illuminati, and had attended the Grand Masonic Convention in 1782, at Wilhelmsbad, in Hessen-Kassell, where the ground-plan for the coming revolution was reputed to have originally been discussed. In 1788, deputies of the Illuminati were sent, upon his request, to inform the French lodges on strategy. Their first item of advice was the creation of a Political Committee in every lodge, and from these committees arose the Jacobins Club. Soon, nearly every lodge in the Grand Orient was infiltrated by supporters of Weishaupt, who became active in spreading the political policies of terrorism against the state.”


The following material is quoted from The Illuminati, the Triumph of Treachery

“Deception and blackmail were the order’s ways to reach its aims. Weishaupt had advised his closest Illuminati brothers:

“Devote yourselves to the art of deception, the art of disguising yourselves, of masking yourselves, spying on others and perceiving their innermost thoughts.”

To make sure that the secrets of the Order were not leaked, Weishaupt created a secret police corps within the Order which he called the “insinuating brothers.”

These worked in the same manner as the Bolshevik’s Cheka and its successors: denunciation, provocation, blackmail and terrorism. The “insinuating brothers” acted with full force during the reign of terror which is called the “Great French Revolution,” which was largely the work of Illuminati agents. Following the French Revolution, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe declared his detestation of it to Eckermann.

He said that all sudden changes brought about by violence were repugnant to him because they went against the order of nature (“Goethe” by Karl Vietor, Stockholm, 1953, p. 100).

So the brothers of the lower degrees were made to provide information (on printed forms) each month on their own actions and those of fellow brothers (the so-called Quibus licet).

The leaders of the Order compiled information from these “confessions” which they could use later against any refractory brothers.

Weishaupt also encouraged the Illuminati to steal or copy secret and government documents. The Order needed these documents for its revolutionary activities but it also wanted the brothers to lose any feelings of loyalty for the established order by having them constantly seeking to betray it. Religion, nationalism, patriotism, loyalty to the ruler, family ties — all such feelings were to be replaced by a single strong loyalty to the Illuminati’s cause.

A defector, Joseph Utzschneider, a professor at the Military Academy in Munich, revealed that the constant preaching against the fatherland disgusted him so much that he left the Order. The supranational socialist power the Illuminati aspired to was summed up in the concept of Novus Ordo Seclorum (The New World Order).

Some of the main points of this program were:

Suppression of all religion, including all communions and doctrines which could not be subjected as tools for Illuminism.

Suppression of all feelings of nationality and — in the long term—abolition of all nations and introduction of an Illuministic world-state.

Successive transference of all private and national property into the hands of the Illuminati. The methods whereby to accomplish this were new taxation laws which Illuministic officials were to introduce. Weishaupt’s original plans also included a progressive income tax (so this is no new invention!) and an even more confiscatory inheritance tax. Karl Marx, too, wanted a high, progressive income tax in his “Communist Manifesto.” The intention was to weaken society.

An all-encompassing espionage and denunciation system with the “insinuating brothers” as prototype. The symbol of this was the all-seeing eye, an eye within a pyramid, which was the Illuminati’s symbol of power.

A global moral rule, a complete standardisation of all people’s innermost will, wishes and aspirations beneath “the one will”; the will of the Illuminati.

The Illuminati simply wanted to abolish all forms of ordered government, patriotism, religion and the family to finally set up a world government.

Upright people would never work for such an abhorrent program, so the “normal” Illuminati were filled with fair phrases about love, charity and suchlike which we call “ideology” today. The further up one advanced, the more primitive were the members. The more primitive the individuals, the lower the ideals enthusing them.

Therefore, the Illuminati have used all sorts of ideologies (Nihilism, Liberalism, Fascism) or made them up themselves (Marxism, Communism, Socialism) whereas they themselves were perfectly independent of all ideology.

At the Masonic conference in Wilhelmsbad, a decision to murder Louis XVI of France and Gustavus III of Sweden was made. (Charles de Hericault, “La Revolution”, p. 104.) The initiative for this conference was Jewish. (A. Cowan, “The X Rays in Freemasonry”, London, 1901, p. 122.) A decision to murder emperor Leopold of Austria was also made at the conference. He was poisoned on the 1st March 1792 by the Jewish freemason Martinowitz. Gustavus III of Sweden was murdered the same month.

The freemasons had gathered in Lyon in 1778 to discuss the coming revolution. Further congresses were held in Paris in 1785 and 1787 and in Frankfurt am Main (where Rothschild had his bank) in 1786. The Illuminati sought control over the press and began placing their infiltrators behind the scenes as “experts”. The Order also wanted to influence schools. Rothschild’s most important lackey, Weishaupt, was also sent to Paris with unlimited funds to bribe capable men, organize a revolt and depose the king. A secret committee was set up at the Masonic convention in February 1785 to co-ordinate the actions of the revolution. It included:

Saint-Martin, Etrilla, Franz Anton Mesmer, Cagliostro, Mirabeau, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand (actually T. Perigord), Bode, Dahlberg, Baron de Gleichen, Lavater, Count Louis de Hesse,

and representatives of the Grand Orient from Poland and Lithuania (“The Trail of the Serpent”, p. 73.)

Weishaupt always played a leading role at the Illuminati’s meetings in Paris. He invited thousands of murderers to Paris. These so-called revolutionaries, who worked to undermine the established order, were often young and many among them were Jews or freemasons, according to the historian Henrik Berggren, Ph.D. (Dagens Syheter, 20th January 1987, Berggren’s “The Grammar of the Revolution”). The three hundred men who seized power under the French Revolution were all Illuminati. (Gerald B. Winrod, “Adam Weishaupt – a Human Devil”, p. 37.) Marat and Robespierre officially belonged to a “revolutionary” organization, The Embittered. The Association of Equals had also been active in Paris since 1786. This organization had, in the same year, already decided where to imprison the “enemies of the people.” The revolutionary leaders Mirabeau, Garat, Robespierre, Marat, Danton, Desmoulins and many others were Illuminati, according to Gerald B. Winrod, “Adam Weishaupt – a Human Devil” (p. 36).

According to Nesta Webster, Danton and Mirabeau were originally members of the Masonic lodge Les Amis Reunis (The Reunited Friends), upon which the Illuminati also put their mark. Louis Leon Saint-Just, called one of the fathers of totalitarianism, was also a freemason. The Illuminati took over the Jacobin clubs already in 1789. 152 of these clubs were active on the 10th August 1790, according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. The Jacobins had a centralized network over all France. The first club was taken over by Weishaupt’s close collaborators Bode and Baron de Busche. The Jacobin funds amounted to 30 million livres in 1791. Honest researchers have pointed out that the history of the Jacobins is in fact a part of the history of the Illuminati. We must not forget that one of Weishaupt’s titles was “Patriarch of the Jacobins.”

The National Assembly was moved into an old manège on the Rue de Rivoli in October 1789. The radicals sat to the left of the chairman, the conservatives to the right. Hence the Illuminati created left and right as ideological concepts in world politics. Everything that had to do with the left was thereafter considered progressive since it was true Illuminism.

At the same time, the “revolutionaries” began to plunder castles of their art treasures. The Jewish writer Anatole France described in his book “The Thirsty Gods” how inspectors with tricolor ribbons around their collars began to turn up at the homes of the wealthy to search for riches. Delighted foreign art dealers bought sculptures and fragments of frescoes. Load after load of confiscated art collections were shipped over the English Channel. The “revolution” was lucrative for the Illuminati and the speculators. All of this was repeated during and after the so-called Russian revolution. The mighty finance dynasty of the Rothschilds was born out of the French “revolution.” The Rothschilds are still in control behind the scenes today, especially within the European Union.

The government reached a deficit that made the pre-Revolutionary debts seem quite modest in comparison. The debt equaled 800 tons of gold, or 40 per cent of the total gold production of the world during the entire 18th century.

The debts owed on the state deficit consumed half of the French budget. All this money found its way into the hands of profiteering Jewish moneylenders.

The real losers in the “revolution” were the Illuminati’s tools — the simple people. The land rights of the small peasants were taken away. The church charities ceased abruptly and any attempt at improving the conditions for loan-takers was regarded as a conspiracy against the state. The ranks of derelicts swelled. During Napoleon’s days one in five Parisians lived by begging.

On the 17th of January 1795, a revolutionary “sister-state” was founded in the Netherlands — the republic of Batavia, where Amsterdam became the capital. Napoleon oversaw the conversion of this state into the kingdom of Holland in 1806.

Jewish “revolutionaries” immediately saw to it that the Jews received full citizenship and so that they had their hands free to act. Maximilien Marie Isidore Robespierre (1758-1794) published a work entitled “To Protect the Political Rights of the Jews” as early as in 1789. Protection of Jewish rights was obviously considered the main priority.

Louis Joseph Marchand, friend of Napoleon Bonaparte, wrote in 1895 that Robespierre was actually a Jew by the name of Ruban from Alsace (“In Napoleon’s Shadow,” San Francisco, 1998).

The myth maintains that this was done to throw off the yoke of tyranny and to protect human rights. In actual fact, the Illuministic reign of terror abolished human rights altogether. It became forbidden for workers to organize and strike for better conditions. This prohibition was legislated on the 14th of June 1791. (Etienne Martin-Saint-Leon, “Les deux C.G.T., syndicalisme et communisme”, Paris, 1923, p. 7.)

The Illuminist coup in France brought none of the improvements that corrupt historians try to make us believe in; instead it resulted in an orgy of violence and intrigue.

What have Jewish ideologues said about this “revolution” in France?

Archives Israelites admitted very ambiguously on the 6th of June 1889: “The French Revolution has a very expressive Hebraic character.” The aim of this new politics, pursued for the people’s (the Illuminati’s) own best, was indubitably totalitarian (Svenska Dagbladet, 14th March 1989).

These experiences were exploited later in Russia when the Illuminati, who called themselves Bolsheviks, paid homage to the men responsible for this revolutionary terrorism: A statue of Robespierre (Ruban), whose family had immigrated to France from Ireland, was erected and a massive armoured cruiser (as well as several factories) were given the name Marat (actually Mosessohn).

Gustavus III was also prepared to send 16,000 Swedish soldiers to help forge a European alliance to crush the French Revolution. He banned the Marseillaise in Sweden. Because of this, the earlier decision to murder the king was carried out. On the 16th of March 1792, Gustavus III was fatally wounded at a masked ball by the freemason Jakob Johan Anckarstrom. The king had been warned about possible assassination attempts but had not taken these warnings seriously. A bust of Anckarstrom stands in the lodge chamber of the Grand Orient in Paris.

The international Illuminati leaders held a conference in New York in 1850. They made preparations to start an International. An American committee was set up. Clinton Roosevelt, Horace Greeley and Charles Dana became its leaders. Another group was formed to co-ordinate acts of terrorism. The Italian Jew Giuseppe Mazzini (born 1805 in Genoa) was selected to lead this group. He had been an Illuminatus since 1837 and was a freemason of the highest (33rd) degree. He assumed leadership of the Bavarian Illuminati. After Mazzini’s death in 1872 his position was taken over by the Jew Adriano Lemmi, who was a revolutionary conspirator and Grand Master of the Grand Orient in Italy. The first enthusiast for Illuminism in Italy was Count Filippo Struzzi, who founded many lodges around Italy and acted as their leader. (Charles William Heckethorn, “Secret Societies”, Moscow, 1993, p. 206.)

Giuseppe Garibaldi was also an Illuminatus.The members of the Garibaldi movement wore red shirts. Terrible atrocities began to take place in Italy, France, Spain, Austria and Russia after the aforementioned conference. Mazzini had the Duke of Parma murdered in 1854, as well as the judges who sentenced the murderers. Violent anarchists raged about until the beginning of the First World War. Tens of thousands of people lost their lives. The world was to be divided into different blocks, which were to be put into violent opposition to each other. This operation was controlled from London. On the 29th of July 1900, King Umberto I was murdered by the freemason Gaetano Bresci in Monza, despite the fact that he was a member of the lodge Savoia Illuminata. The murderer Bresci belonged to an American lodge in Paterson, New Jersey.

Over the years, the Illuminati have moved their headquarters between different cities. In the 1870s it was in Frankfurt am Main. According to Nordisk Familjebok it was in Berlin in 1907. Brockhaus Enzyklopadie (Wiesbaden, 1970) stated that the Illuminati were legalized in 1896. Their leader then was Leopold Engel, who published the Illuminati’s history in 1906 (“Geschichte des Illuminatenordens”).

According to “Meyers Enzyklopadisches Lexikon”, the various national llluminati groups combined to form a world association in 1925. According to Store Norske Lexikon (Oslo, 1979, Vol. 6, p. 183), the Illuminati still continue their activities as a secret organization.

The Illuminati’s headquarters moved to Switzerland during the First World War and to New York after the Second World War (The Harold Pratt building, 58, East 68th Street). The Rockefellers now funded the Illuminati instead of the Rothschilds (William Guy Carr, “Pawns in the Game”.) An especially useful tool of the Illuminati in the 20th century has been the I.G. Farben company, led by its Jewish chief Max Warburg.

Today, the Illuminati control the whole Masonic movement. They also control Rotary, Lions, B’nai B’rith, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg group, Skull & Bones, Bohemian Club and similar groups. Rotary International was founded by Paul Harris (member of B’nai B’rith) in Chicago in 1905. The Lions Club was also founded by B’nai B’rith in Chicago in 1917.”


The Frankist Ecstatics of the Eighteenth Century

Copyright © 1998 by T Allen Greenfield
First published in Agape V1N2 February, 1998 EV
Agape copyright ©1998 by Ordo Templi Orientis

"Uno avulso non deficit alter. " - Virgil

By T. Allen Greenfield

A century before the European Enlightenment produced the conditions in which modern European Judaism arose, the ghetto world of the Jews of Europe and Asia Minor was wracked by a messianic fervor virtually unknown today outside Judaic intellectual circles.
The influence of the Qabalism of the late medieval period reached a final flowering in the works of Isaac Luria and other mystics of the 1600s.
An outright messianic movement developed around the person of one Shabbetai Tzvi (1626-76 EV) and his prophet, Nathan of Gaza.
This movement was shattered when, faced with martyrdom or conversion, the would-be messiah Tzvi chose conversion to Islam.
Nathan became a Roman Catholic, and the movement largely collapsed, though some followed Tzvi into conversion, and there is down to the present time an Islamic sect in Turkey that follows Tzvi's teachings.
In recent years there has been some effort made among Jewish revisionist historians to more-or-less rehabilitate Shabbetai Tzvi as a kind of protoZionist leader.
It is certainly true that the messianic movement's collapse led in the 1700s to the development of the mystical-ecstatic Chassidic Judaism. Under the leadership of Israel Baal Shem Tov, this has been far more widely accepted as a legitimate Jewish religious trend. Scholars of the stature of the late existentialist Martin Buber have done much to establish the legitimacy of Chassidic thought and practice. It has nonetheless continued as a movement to have both a Qabalistic and messianic undertone, as witnessed by the messianic expectations centered on the Lubovicher Rebbe that reached a peak shortly before his recent death.
At approximately the same time that Chassidic Judaism was developing, another trend which for many years was almost lost to history was bubbling up in the Ghettoes of Eastern Europe in the wake of the Tzvi messianic expectations. Indeed, most older English-language sources relegate this rather substantial movement to a footnote, usually couched in the most unflattering terms.
This was a sect known as the Zoharists or Frankists, after Jacob Frank (1726-91 EV), originally named Jacob Leibowicz1.
Like the Chassidim, the Zoharists were deeply steeped in Qabala and magick and ecstatic religious expression.
Like the followers of Tzvi, they were also messianic. Unique to the Frankists was a doctrine of salvation through sexual ecstasy that had not characterized these other tendencies. Indeed, the Zoharists anticipated the sexual magick that emerged a century and more later under the influence of such luminaries as P.B. Randolph, Max Theon and, ultimately, Aleister Crowley.
There is a bare chance, in fact, that the Zoharists may have influenced these later exponents of sexual spirituality.
Frank was born in Galicia in Polish territory, traveled widely, and died in Offenbach, Germany on December 10, 1791 EV.
He traveled in the Balkans and got to know the followers of Tzvi, some of whom looked forward to the latter's resurrection.
About 1751 he proclaimed himself the Messiah and promulgated a "Higher Torah" -- based on the medieval Qabalistic writings of the Sefer Zohar ("Book of Splendour").
Frank maintained that certain elect individuals were above the conventional moral law.
He even went so far as to engaged the staid Rabbinical Community of the time in a debate over the value of the ecstatic principles promulgated in the Zohar as opposed to the legalism of the Talmud, which the Zoharists considered blasphemous.
Within five years the Rabbinical Judaism had denounced the Zoharists as heretics.
The Frankists enjoyed some protection in Roman Catholic circles, ever hopeful of making conversions among the Jews.
In a certain sense Frank's critique of the Talmudic Judaism of his time resembled the friction between Jesus and the Pharisees of an earlier era.
Frank, who felt that his sect was above restriction, was quick to exploit this protection, and proceeded to promise Baptism of his followers.
He was himself baptized in Warsaw with the Polish King, Augustus III, acting as his godfather.
But the Frankists continued to practice sexual orgiastic ecstasy as a spiritual sacrament, and soon ran afoul of the Holy Inquisition.
Like Count Cagliostro a few years later, Baron Jacob Frank found himself imprisoned by the inquisitors in 1760 EV, at the fortress of Czestochowa.
He languished there for 13 years until being freed by the Russian conquest.
He relocated to Germany, which then became the seat of the Zoharist movement.
It should be noted, and more than in passing, that Baron Frank's sexual movement among the Jews coincided with the birth and flourishing of the so-called "Hellfire Clubs" of England and France, the Elect Cohens and later Martinists of France, and other communities with similar ideas and practices of sacred sexuality.
Frank lived out his life in the luxury of the nobility, supported by his huge following.
Most unusual for the time, Frank was succeeded, upon his death, by his daughter Eve2, who continued the Work of the sect until her own passing in 1816 EV.
Be it noted that later in the 19th century another enigmatic Polish Jew, the son of Rabbi Judes Lion Bimstein of Warsaw, came to teach an almost identical sacred sexuality as the Grand Master of the Hermetic Brotherhood of Light.
This man was one Louis Maximilian Bimstein, better known as Aia Aziz, and better still as Max Theon.
Based in North Africa and France, Theon taught a "fully Tantric" approach to spirituality, according to Sri Aurobindo.
He exercised a profound influence upon HB of L Frontal Chief Peter Davidson, who, in turn, was a profound influence upon Papus and other luminaries of the "occult revival".
Whether this represents a direct continuity from the Zoharists we may never know. Clearly, Jacob Frank, his daughter Eve and their followers deserve a special place in the history of Western Sexual Occultism comparable to that only now being fully recognized where P.B. Randolph, Peter Davidson and their circle are concerned.

For further reading :

MY PEOPLE by Abba Eban (Behrman-Random House, 1968) (section) "False Messiahs" pp. 232-238;
THE LEGENDS OF THE BAAL SHEM (translated 1955) and
TALES OF RABBI NACHMAN (translated 1956) by Martin Buber;
THE HERMETIC BROTHERHOOD OF LUXOR by Godwin, Chanel & Deveney (Weiser, 1995) pp. 293-302;
MAGIC, MYSTICISM, AND HASIDISM by Gedalyah Nigal (1994);
DEMYSTIFYING THE MYSTICAL by Chaim Dalfin (1995). Also see:
FRANK, Jacob, (article) Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia (1994);
Frank, Jacob, (article) Encyclopaedia Britannica (1995);
Frank, Jacob (article) Webster's New Biographical Dictionary (1983);
FRANK, JACOB, (article) The Encyclopedia of Jewish Knowledge (Behrman's, 1938);

Most general and especially Jewish references have either an article under Frank's name, or some mention in an article on 'false messiahs' or specifically Shabbetai Tzvi.
Take note that there is a lot of nonsense in reference to the Zoharists, and many usually reliable sources will either repeat without variation the assertions of earlier sources, or fall into sectarian vilification. One would do well to sort through the many short references, and compare consistencies and inconsistencies.

Notes :

The reader may be bewildered by the variation in names; Jacob Frank is variously referred to as Jacob Leibowicz, Jankiew Leibowicz and the more familiar Frank.
His birthplace is sometimes given as Podolia, Berezanka or Korolowka.
He is reported to have died in Offenbach.
Patronized by the Archduchess Maria Theresa, he may indeed have been made a Baron.
He was certainly a man of wealth and means to the end of his colorful life.
Frank's daughter was variously called Eve or Eva, depending on source material.
She became the object of a devotional subcult herself, with some followers keeping small statues of her in their homes.

Yakov Leib Frank "Jacob Frank"

Jacob Frank's real name was Yakov ben Judah Leib Frankovich (1726-91).
He was born in Podolia (then Poland, now a region of Ukraine), the son of a rabbi.
As a young man traveled in the Middle East, where the Turks gave him the surname Frank.
On his return to Poland in 1755, he founded the Frankists, a heretical Jewish sect that was an anti-Talmudic outgrowth of the mysticism of Sabbatai Zevi.
Subsequently, he claimed to be the recipient of direct revelations from heaven and exhorted his followers to espouse Christianity as an intermediate stage in the transition to a future messianic religion.
In 1759 the Frankists underwent a spectacular mass baptism at Lvov, Poland (now L'viv, Ukraine), under the eyes of the Polish nobility.
But the church brought charges of heresy against him, which resulted in his imprisonment in 1760.
Upon his release 13 years later, Frank assumed the role of messiah, and selected 12 apostles.
He settled at Brünn, Austria (now Brno, Czech Republic) where he gained the patronage Maria Theresa, archduchess of Austria, who employed him as an apologist of Christianity to the Jews.
After 1786 he moved to the small German town of Offenbach, where he spent the rest of his life in luxury, thanks to the donations of his followers.
After his death leadership of the sect passed to his daughter Eve Frank, but the movement was soon absorbed into the Roman Catholic church.
From "Frank, Jacob," Microsoft (R) Encarta. Copyright (c) 1994 MicrosoftCorporation. Copyright (c) 1994 Funk & Wagnall's Corporation.

Frank kept Sabbateanism alive and ended its tribalism, opening its adherents to the world outside Judaism.
Sabbateanism become Frankism was one of the most important of the 18th century movements which freed man.
The great revolution in consideration, [the Turkish revolution], and the French and American revolutions sprang from his loins.
Prof. Harris Lenowitz
The Sayings of Yakov Frank. An aspect of the Godhead, a true aspect, grew in me like a pearl that grows of itself; and I have no man to whom I might reveal the truth of this matter.
Yakov Leib Frank (aka Jacob Frank) was the Third Strand in a Jewish Messianic Trinity beginning with "The First," Sabbatai Zevi;
passing through Sabbatai's successor, "The Second," Rebbe Berechiah;
and ending with "The Third," Frank himself.
It's my interpretation that these "Three Strands" also refer to the realms of the Biblical Jacob (Judaism), Esaus (Christianity) and Ishmael (Islam) - a trimurtri, so to speak, Frank alludes to when he says: "The Holy One Blessed Is He -- His face [i.e., Sefirah Tiferet] wonderous beautiful - set me on His knees and gave me a Strand of Golden Threads and said to me, 'Look my son, when the day comes to unfasten this Strand you shall not let it go."

The New World Order - A Brief History
The 15th, 16th and 17th centuries were an age of tremendous progress.
It saw the Renaissance, the reformation, the arts and Sciences were reborn after the dark ages.
Yet it was also an age which saw the occult secret societies flourishing as they had not done for many centuries.
Many leaders in this new age of science were occultists. The Rosicrucian, free Masonic and cabalistic sects were leading in this occult revival.
One such scientist of the late 15th Century was Theophrastus Bambastus Von Honeium, who is commonly called Parcelsus, believed by many to be the founder of modern medicine, Parcelsus was a Rosicrucian!
These groups were a revival of the pagan mystery schools of Egypt and Babylon and that mixture of the Jewish religion and freemasonry known as 'The Cabbala'.
The Cabbala had its origin in the Babylonian captivity of the Kingdom of Judah and claimed to throw new light on the old testament scriptures by looking for occult mystical interpretations in the biblical text.
In 1754 Matinez de Pasqually, a Portuguese Jewish Rosicrucian and mason, founded 'The French Illumines', also known as 'The Order of Elus Cohens' (elected priests).
After his death the movement was led by Louis Claude de Saint-Martin and became known as the Martinists.
In 1760 Dom Pernetti started 'Illumines d'Avigion', all these secret societies were based upon the Cabbala. Jacob Frank was a Polish Jew who founded a movement in 1755 called 'The Frankists', sometimes known as 'The illuminated'.
The doctrines of The Frankists were based upon the cabalistic book 'The Zohara' or 'Book of Light'.
It is upon this book that all modern occultism is based.
Rabbi Marvin Anteiman has stated 'The Frankists glorified evil as holy, even as a means of salvation, and quoted cabbala authority Gershom Scholem as saying that Frank will always be remembered as one of the phenomena of Jewish history.
The Frankists followed cabalistic priests and false miracle workers were known as Zaddikim or Ba'al Shems.
There is evidence that Amschel Mayer, the founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty may have been a Frankist, the symbol of the Frankists was a Red Shield.
This very sign was placed over their family shop in Frankfurt. Amschel Mayer chose that red shield as the family name, Roth=red, Schild=shield==Rothschild.
Upon that shield was the 'Star of David', though this star has nothing to do with the biblical King David.
The 5 or 6 pointed star has always been the most important symbol of the occult, Magick, Witchcraft and Satanism.
This symbol is a cabalistic sign, first used by an Ashkenazi Jew Menahem ben Duji, who changed his name to David Al-Roy.
This man was a leading Ba'al Shem of the Cabalistic, who also claimed to be the Messiah.
The best known British Ba'al Shem of the 18th century was Hayim Jacob Falk, known as 'The king of the Jews.
Falk was a leading Free Mason, and a leader in other secret societies, he was a supporter of The Duc du Orlen in the French revolution.
However one order was set to combine all the malignant features of all these groups, The Illuminati.

Ten False Messiahs

I am convinced that there is no subject that has the potential for misunderstanding as does that of Messianism.
In popular religious thought in the United States, it is simply a given that Jesus is the messiah - end of discussion.
No thought is given to what are the characteristics of a messiah, what he is to accomplish, what are his qualifications, or even how many messiahs there are.
Many are not even aware that the Jews, with whom Christians share the Bible, do not accept the New Testament and therefore have a much different view of the messiah.
Seldom does anyone go to the Hebrew Bible for understanding of these matters from the point of view of the Torah, the Prophets, and the Writings, to see how they compare with the manner in which the theme of messiah is developed in the New Testament.
In the Christianity that has evolved in our time, every prophetic utterance about a deliverer, a redeemer, a prophet to come, a savior, or many, many other such designations is presented as being fulfilled in the person of Jesus of Nazareth.
What is needed is some broadened understanding of the whole scope of messianic thought, rather that a closed minded view that is common in both Christian and Jewish circles. I believe that both have allowed some degree of error to creep in.
Unfortunately, there is no subtle way to say that the widespread influence of traditional Christianity has led to a mindless acceptance of a messiah that is very different from the earliest messianic notions.
Please understand that I am not trying to trash Christianity by saying that.
I am simply drawing attention to the fact that Jesus is presented as the fulfillment of every facet of the Old Testament.
If one wants to have a comprehensive understanding of the subject, he should make it his business to understand the issue of messianism, not only from the Christian view but from the Jewish view which preceeded it.
Whatever view one takes concerning Jesus of Nazareth, the notion that all the prophetic figures in the Hebrew Bible refer to the same individual simply cannot be supported by a careful investigation of the Bible.
Many such prophecies are simply not referring to The Messiah.
In addition, there are multiple messiahs spoken of in the Prophets.
Every king and priest in ancient Israel was a messiah.
The Hebrew word moschiach, from which we transliterate our word messiah, means simply the anointed one, from the practice of anointing one who is chosen with oil.
Only recently, since the public has been given access to the Dead Sea Scrolls, have we had a window of access into the messianic views of the period that followed the close of the Hebrew cannon.
A much different view of messianism has emerged.
In the Dead Sea Scrolls, it comes out clearly that at least two, and perhaps three, messiahs were expected (one of David and one of Aaron and a third figure, the Prophet, who is said to come with the messiahs of Aaron and Israel).
There are also many other prophetic figures whom one would never equate with the messiah, were it not for the professional help of some overzealous theologian.
It is not my purpose in this article, however, to discuss the Christian notion of the messiah, or the relative merits of one view over the other.
That will have to wait for other articles.
Here I will explore an aspect of the Jewish concept of the messiah by looking at a ten prominent figures throughout Jewish history who have come to be known as false messiahs.
Given the prevalent misperceptions of the messiah, one might think that such an article would be anti-Jewish.
This is certainly not my intention.
In fact, the bulk of the material for this article is adapted from a Jewish publication, The Jewish Almanac, October 1980 edition, published by Bantam Books.
The Jews themselves recognize these individuals as false messiahs.
One might think that this would be an embarrassing admission for the them.
But that is, again, based on the Christian notion of the messiah rather than the Jewish notion.
Among Jews these individuals are not thought of as heretics or demonic agents, although some of them exhibited some rather bizarre behavior.
They are simply would-be deliverers of Israel who failed to achieve what they aspired to.
Understand this key concept : The major prophesied purpose of the messiah is to restore the greatness of Israel.
He is expected to be wise and understanding, a charismatic individual who will bring peace and justice to Israel and mankind.
He will usher in an age of world peace.
The notion of The Messiah took form mostly in the era after the close of the Hebrew canon, climaxing at the time of the destruction of Jerusalem in the first century.
It has undoubtedly been modified over the centuries that followed, in a kind of knee-jerk reaction to Christian claims that Jesus was The Messiah. Judaism seems to have absorbed some of that tendency to coalesce various prophetic personalities into a single Messiah, although in their view, it would decidedly not be Jesus.
One should note that, as long as the temple stood, there was no real messianic expectation.
God was still with Isreal in the temple liturgy.
The nation of Judah still existed as a political entity, albeit only a shadow of its former self.
The messianic notion at that time was only half baked, so to speak.
There was a realization that a restoration of the former glory of the kingdom was needed, but the kingdom had not been totally eliminated.
Messianic expectation could not come into full flower until the temple and the polity of Israel was completely gone.
When the temple and the nation of Judea were obliterated by Rome in the year 70, the kingdom was completely dead.
At this time the messianic expectation began in earnest. Let us now examine the unfortunate episodes that followed over the next 2000 years and the individuals around whom these times revolved.


Jacob Frank (1726-1791)
With the embarrassing disillusionment of the Shabbatai Tzvi debacle of the previous century, you would think in unlikely that the Jews would again be drawn in to a similar circumstance again.
But it happen again with tragic consequences.
Residual Sabbateans were still clinging to their faith in the early eighteenth century, although they were mostly underground to avoid the wrath of their peers.
But their was growing expectation that the time was ripe for a new contender to messianic office from Poland.
That contender was Jacob Frank (Jacob Judah Leib), an arrogant practical joker, involved with gangs of rebellious youth.
He would boast of his complete ignorance of Jewish matters.
But he was a charismatic leader, a spirited force to coalesce the scattered messianic.
His appearance was destined to throw the entire Jewish world of Poland into intense agitation and despair.
As a merchant he traded in the Balkans, dealing in cloth and gems.
He studied under a Sabbatean teacher and became involved in the Zohar.
His teacher promised to initiate the young Frank into the secret Sabbatean sect after he became married the daughter of a respected merchant.
He was initiated into the mysteries settled in with a large group of Sabbateans in Salonika.
He gave up on his trade for an ambitious new role as prophet.
Soon he was proclaiming himself to be the divine reincarnation of the soul of Shabbatai Tzvi.
Frank began travelling to many towns, visiting Sabbatean cells, which quickly came under his influence.
He gathered many adherents, proclaiming his messiahship.
His teaching was heavily about the acquisition of wealth and riches, even if by the most fraudulent means.
In 1756 he and twenty of his followers were discovered conducting a heretical religious orgy behind locked doors.
Opponents claimed that the Frankists were performing an indecent dance around a naked woman and kissing her.
Later Frank claimed that he had purposely opened the windows to compel his believers to go public after decades of hiding.
The police broke down the doors and arrested the disciples.
Frank, mistaken for a Turkish foreigner, was expelled from the country.
Frank and his disciples were excommunicated by rabbinical courts everywhere.
The Frankists were denounced to the authorities and eventually Frank was again arrested.
To gain his freedom, Frank agreed to convert to Islam.
But after this conversion, Frank persisted in making secret visits to Poland to confer with his disciples.
He remained the leader of the majority of Sabbateans all over Galicia, the Ukraine, and Hungary.
They were outwardly Jewish but secretly transgressed all the Torah prohibitions, especially those concerning fornication, adultery, and incest.
His excommunications prompted a wave of persecution.
Frank and his followers appealed to the bishop of Poland for protection, by exaggerating their common beliefs with Christianity such as the Trinity and rejection of the Talmud.
The Church saw it as an opportunity to convert thousands.
They began forcing anti-Jewish propaganda out of the Franks.
To ease the persecution, the Frankists, issued a proclamation that they were "almost" Christians, though they did not fully embrace Christianity.
They composed a declaration of faith that would satisfy the Church's demands.
To sweeten the deal, they asked for a public debate against the rabbis.
The bishop was quite willing to protect the Frankists from persecution in order to promote hatred for ordinary Jews.
The public debate that followed was moderated (manipulated would be a better word) by the bishop, who was anything but impartial.
It spawned public burnings of the Talmud.
These continued until the sudden death of the bishop.
This caused popular sentiment to turn against the Frankists once again.
Persecutions of Frankists again increased.
Many Frankists, including Frank himself, fled Poland at that time.
Ever the opportunist, Frank asked for protection from the king of Poland, citing his past relationship with the archbishop.
When he returned to Poland, Frank was boldened to proclaim himself as the living embodiment of God.
He brazenly rejected Sabbatean theology.
He introduced new rituals, shunning kabbalistic jargon and capitalizing on Christian terminology.
He appointed twelve apostles and twelve female concubines to serve him.
To ingratiate himself with the new bishop, Frank asked again for a public debate.
His stated purpose this time was to prove Christianity and to demonstrate the blood libel (the supposed requirement of Christian blood to make matzah)!
This only demonized Franks image among the Jews.
They regarded him as a sorcerer.
The public debates took place in 1759.
Frank himself participated in the last debate only.
This one concerned the blood libel.
He deceptively used misquoted statements and altered documents.
External pressure finally halted the debates.
Many of the Frankists submitted to baptism, including Frank himself.
In fact, he was baptized a second time under the sponsorship of the King of Poland after arriving in Warsaw in a very public display.
But, the ruse could not last forever.
Word got out that some of the Frankists saw Frank as God.
This was too much. Frank was arrested, tried, and exiled to a fortress, where he was confined for thirteen years.
As the blood libel spread, many Jews were annihilated.
In turn, there were repercussions against the Frankists, who went further underground.
Frank somehow maintained communication with his disciples on the outside.
It was rumored that he held secret sex orgies in the compound.
Frank continued to grow more duplicitous.
His final years were spent living like a king in a luxurious mansion near Frankfort.
He was supported by huge gifts from followers around the world.
He died suddenly in 1791 of an apoplectic stroke.
His children tried to take up the leadership but they were largely unsuccessful.
Frank's disciples continued to uphold their faith in him for years, refusing to admit to themselves that he was a charlatan.
Frank's work "Words of the Master" were still being published in the 1820's.
Adam Mickiewicz, the famous Polish poet, was a Frankist.
Likewise, many in the Polish nobility were Frankists well into the nineteenth century.
Clandestine communities of Frankists are still thought to exist to this day.
The last of the ten false messiahs is undoubtedly the most difficult to contemplate and to write about because he is contemporary.
As with most great men, the essence of the contribution he has made is not always appreciated properly in the present.
The facts about his life are easily gathered because his movement is far flung.
There have been newspaper articles about him.
There have been television programs about him and his movement.
His work and influence can be seen on the internet.
There is no shortage of information about this man.
Yet, it is the freshness of the information that makes it more difficult to evaluate.
To begin with, I run the risk of offending those who believe in him as the messiah by simply classifying him among false messiahs.
I do not wish to offend, but I must be consistent in using Jewish criteria to make that classification.
This man never claimed to be the messiah, but his people attempted to draft him for the job.
Irrespective of his greatness and of the fruits of his life, he did NOT usher in the messianic age.
He, therefore, is not the messiah.


© Copyright 2000 by Wayne Simpson
Biblical Research Foundation
629 Lexington Road, Sapulpa, OK 74066
This document may be reproduced and distributed provided this copyright notice remains on all copies.

A converted Jew, J. J. Frank,
forms a sect called the Frankists at Lemberg.

These people were all Jews who had become Christians in revolt against the evils taught in the Talmud.
They said that it was the Talmud which was the root of all the troubles between Jews and Gentiles.
Prince Etienne de Mikoulissky, administrator of the archidiocese of Lemberg, instituted public debates between the Frankists and the Talmudic Jews.
A debate held in July took place in which various matters were dealt with point by point until six points had been settled;
the seventh one was the Frankists' declaration that "the Talmud teaches the employment of Christian blood and he who believes in the Talmud ought to make use of this blood."
The Frankists said they had learned this in their youth as Jews.
Under the heading Baruch Yavan, the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903) Vol. II, p. 563, admits that the Frankists brought the blood accusation against the Talmudists; also in Vol. VII, p. 579, under Judah Lob ben Nathan Krysa.
The Frankists completely defeated their opponents in these debates.
Ultimately they became assimilated into the Christian community.
There is a large bibliography with reference to the Frankist community, of which the following two works may receive mention here:

La malfaisance juive, by Pikulski, Lvov, 1760;
Matériaux sur la question relative aux accusations portées
contre les Juifs à propos des crimes rituels,
by J. O. Kouzmine, St. Petersburg, 1914.

Sefer ha-zohar
(Hebrew : "Book of Splendour")
13th-century book, mostly in Aramaic, that is the classic text of esoteric Jewish mysticism, or Kabbala.
Though esoteric mysticism was taught by Jews as early as the 1st century AD, the Zohar gave new life and impetus to mystical speculations through the 14th and subsequent centuries.
Many Kabbalists, in fact, invested the Zohar with a sanctity that is normally accorded only to the Torah and the Talmud.
The Zohar consists of several units, the largest of which--usually called the Zohar proper--deals with the "inner" (mystical, symbolic) meaning of biblical texts, especially those taken from the first five books of the Bible (Torah), from the Book of Ruth, and from the Song of Solomon.
The lengthy homilies of the Zohar are mixed with short discourses and parables, all centred on Simeon ben Yohai (2nd century AD) and his disciples.
Though the text names Simeon as the author, modern scholars are convinced that the major portion of the Zohar should be credited to Moses de León (1250-1305) of Spain.
They do not rule out the possibility, however, that earlier mystic materials were used or incorporated into the present text.
Because the mystery of creation is a recurrent theme in the Zohar, there are extensive discussions of the 10 divine emanations (sefirot, literally "numbers") of God the Creator, which reputedly explain the creation and continued existence of the universe.
Other major topics are the problem of evil and the cosmic significance of prayer and good deeds.
After their expulsion from Spain in 1492, the Jews were much taken up with thoughts of the Messiah and eschatology and turned to the Zohar as a guide for mystical speculations.
The greatest influence of the Zohar, especially among the masses, did not occur, therefore, until several centuries after the book was composed.


Out of print :
The Kronika : on Jacob Frank & the Frankist movement, by Hillel Levine, 1984
ISBN 965-208-065-9

About the Frankists :

Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000
From: Michael Honey <>
Subject: I have located "The Militant Messiah" [by Arthur Mandel].

It was ultimately located at Bridgewater State College library in Bridgewater, Mass.
The book has been worth the wait. It describes in a fair amount of detail the bizarre life and claims of Jacob FRANK, and there are several pages devoted to Frank's 13-year stay in Brno (1773-1786).
The book indicates that a number of these families emigrated in 1848 to the United States, and one of the most famous of their descendants was the late Justice and leading Zionist, Louis Dembitz BRANDEIS.
Justice BRANDEIS was married to Alice GOLDMARK from another Frankist family.



The Anti-Defamation League
Intimidation (including false accusations) by the ADL is their specialty, but through
the strength of God, I have no fear of them. There is nothing wrong with exposing
real anti-Semitism directed toward Jewish and Arabic people. Sometimes, the ADL
do indeed expose real anti-Semites (like the neo-Nazis, 33rd Degree Scottish Rite
Freemason Henry Ford, Charles Coughlin, etc.). On the other hand, real researches
make manifest of the ADL not only being an arm of the elite (many of these elitists
advocate one world government), but some have accused the ADL of once having
mafia and pornography ties. The ADL is a network of people that stalks some
people under the guise of “anti-Semitism” to elevate their own agenda. Many
members of the ADL sincerely fight against bigotry, but their leadership have been
corrupted with compromise. Their agenda is extreme political correctness and the
promotion of a far left agenda. Out of the many exposes on them, one was created
by William Cooper. William Cooper (who died in a murder at October 2001) created
his The Hour of the Time tape series on the ADL, which is the most truthful and
fairest around to lay the reality on the Anti-Defamation League. The ADL’s roots
existed from the Jewish Masonic Lodge of B’nai B’rith, so that will be outlined first.
In the words of William Cooper:
“I am not talking about Jews. I am talking about a branch of the Illuminati, the
control structure that is bringing one world government into fruition, destroying the
sovereignty of nations, and many many other things.”
According to Edith Starr-Miller’s 1933 Occult Theocracy, German Jews headed by
Henry Jones invented the B’nai B’rith in October 13, 1843. Other founders include
Isaac Rosenbourg, William Renau, and Reuben Rodacher. It was then called
“Bundes-Brueder” (which means the “League of brothers”); it was a German name
because the founders were Jewish-German and they only spoke German and
Yiddish. The “B’nai B’rith” itself acknowledges that at least four of its founders were
Freemasons. The Order’s Motto was: “Benevolence, Brotherly love and Harmony.”
The 12 founders were in their 20’s and 30’s. They came from Germany into New
York in the 1800’s. B’nai B’rith have Hebrew titles for their officers. The president
was called the Grand Nsi Abh; the vice president, Grand Aleph; the secretary,
Grand Sopher, etc. The Scottish Rite of Freemasonry also support the B’nai B’rith
Lodge, yet the Scottish Rite is more powerful than them. B’nai B’rith is not of true
Judaism (though Judaism is an obsolete religion). The B’nai B’rith is anti-God, antiTorah, and anti-Moses since they regularly support the Kabbalah and occult
principles (according to the Freemasonry website). The Scottish Rite in
fact worked with the Rothschilds, the Jesuits, evil Brits, and the rest of the Elite to
strengthen the secessionist movement (including the funding the Union side too).
There is nothing wrong with secession in it of itself (In other words, America is a
product of secession from the British Empire). Yet, people have a right to criticize
many secessionists who wanted black people to be further oppressed unfairly in a
society via slavery, murder, rape, etc. The Civil War was anti-North and anti-South.
The Elite wanted it to happen so the North and South could extremely hate each
other causing division and not unity to solve their problems peacefully. There is
nothing wrong with the South seceding legally. There is something wrong with
preemptively bombing Fort Sumter, South Carolina which began the Civil War,
Lincoln shutting down newspapers who harbor various opinions, suspending
habeas corpus, the oppression of slavery on black people, the war crimes committed
by both sides during the Civil War, and the restriction of equal rights to all people
during that time.
The Knights of the Golden Circle, Freemasonry, and other Secret Societies infiltrated
the leaders of the North and South. Judah P. Benjamin was a Jewish strategist (who
some believe worked for the House of Rothschild) who had a crucial part in the
Civil War. Benjamin lived from 1811 to 1884. Now, he was born as a British subject
in the West Indies. Judah Philip Benjamin became a citizen of America. His father
was one of the founders of the Reform congregation in America (His father was
Philip Benjamin from England). Benjamin was raised in Charleston, South Carolina.
Judah Benjamin owned slaves. He was a traitor to his Jewish race since his ancestors
experienced Egyptian oppression, yet he supported slavery that was oppressive
against black Americans. That is why Republican Benjamin Wade of Ohio accused
him of being an Israelite in Egyptian clothing." Wade is right, because Judah
Benjamin deserted the real tenets of the religion of Moses. In September 1861, Judah
Benjamin was the Confederate Secretary of War. Later, he became the Confederate
States’ Secretary of State. He quarreled with the Confederate Generals P.G.T.
Beauregard and Stonewall Jackson. This came to a head over the loss of Roanoke
Island to the Union "without a fight" in February 1862. Confederate leader Jefferson
Davis was responsible for this. Judah Benjamin was so desperate after Confederate
defeats that he said that: “…Let us say to every Negro who wishes to go into the
ranks, 'Go and fight - you are free…“ Robert E. Lee supported the proposal, but it
was too late. The Civil War ended the Confederate nation. Judah Benjamin died in
Paris at May 6, 1884. Some have accused Benjamin of being a conspirator of
Abraham Lincoln’s assassination. Yet, those responsible for Lincoln’s assassination
didn’t include Benjamin per se, but the Vatican/Jesuit network (since many coconspirators like Surratt, etc. were in fact Roman Catholics), the Knights of the
Golden Circle, and other secret orders (working with the international banking
elite). This has been proven by numerous books from CT Wilcox’s book to others.
According to Joseph Geringer, John Wilkes Booth was a member of the Knights of
the Golden Circle. Anton Chaitkan makes a strong evaluation of the B’nai B’rith:
“…The Independent Order of B’nai B’rith formed in 1843 as a Jewish community subproject in the restoration of Masonry by the Scottish Rite and the British foreign
office. Though most of its lodges were in the North, B’nai B’rith was openly proConfederate. Though it claimed to be neutral in the war, many of the Order’s Northern
spokesmen were stridently pro-slavery. B’nai B’rith’s post-Civil War leaders were
pro-Confederate operatives, including later president Simon Wolf, who had been
arrested by the War Department in Washington, D.C. as the lawyer for a Confederate
spy ring. "Rabbi Isaac Wise established B’nai B’rith’s center for the "liberalizing" of
Judaism in Cincinnati, Ohio-coinciding with Cincinnati’s other great Scottish Rite
scheme, the launching of the Knights of the Golden Circle. Wise was officially neutral
in the Civil War. Core leaders of the B’nai B’rith from then on have been Scottish Rite
Masons. The political establishment associated with the Order has always had its
headquarters in London...” (From
It’s a known historical fact that many Sephardic Jews (not all Jews), related to the
B’nai B’rith were involved in the slave trade. Charleston’s B’nai B’rith leader Edwin
Deleon’s family were slave traders. Deleon advocated a stronger Anglo-American
alliance. The B’nai B’rith lodge was pro-slavery for the most part. Simon Wolf (1855-
1953) was one of the famous Order of the B’nai B’rith members who was arrested by
Lafayette C. Baker (Chief of the U.S. Secret Service) on charges on spying and
blockading the Confederacy. In fact, Wolf and Benjamin Peixoto (another B’nai
B’rith person) were close friends with John Wilkes Booth (assassin of Abraham
Lincoln and according to Izola Forrester’s This One Mad Act was again a member of
the Knights of the Golden Circle. Forrester was John Wilkes Booth’s granddaughter
so this source does indeed have credibility). Let it also be known that many Jewish
people opposed slavery and publicly called for the freedom of African Americans
during the 19th century. In the Civil War, twice as many Jews fought for the Union
as for the Confederacy. Northern Jews, many of them recent German immigrants,
were strongly pro-republican and anti-slavery.
Now let’s go into the 20th century. James Bulloch was a confederate exile, which was
Judah Benjamin’s secret service liaison man in England. Bulloch a Confederate chief
arms procurer. He was arrested in 1854 in the Cuban/Quitman fiasco. Gustavus
Myers was a channel between Judah Benjamin and August Belmont. Hays and many
Jewish leaders in Virginia back then were linked to the Rothschilds of London and
the Freemasons. According to Fritz’s literature, Gustavus A. Myers was Judah P.
Benjamin’s closest friend. The Rothschilds hence had a heavy hand in the Civil War.
Gustavus A. Myers was the former president of the Richmond City Council, and the
undisputed head of Richmond's Jewish community. Gustavus A. Myers's maternal
grandfather, Moses Michael Hays, had brought the original ``patent'' and rituals
from England to found the Scottish Rite in the American colonies. Get this Hampton
Roads connection. Gustavuas A. Myers’ grandfather was Moses Michael Hays.
Moses Michael Hays was the man who created the Scottish Rite and 33rd Degree
in America. Moses lived in Norfolk, Virginia on Freemason Street in Downtown.
Moses Myers was a leader in Norfolk’s Jewish community. I‘ve seen Moses
Hays’s home before.
Theodore Roosevelt’s uncle was not only James Bulloch, but Roosevelt was a
Freemason. Theodore Roosevelt led imperialism in the world and was an evil man.
Teddy’s clique conquered Cuba in the Spanish-American War at 1898. His clique
would committed atrocities over in the Philliphines under the orders of Freemason
Arthur MacArthur. The ADL was founded and headed for its first 30 years by
Sigmund Livingston, a well-known Chicago attorney. The ADL was created in 1913.
Livingston headed the powerful B’nai B’rith Midwest Lodge No. 6. Now, the ADL’s
charter is that:
“…The immediate object of the League is to stop, by appeals to reason and
conscience and, if necessary, by appeals to law, the defamation of the Jewish people.
Its ultimate purpose is to secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike and to
put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination against and ridicule of any
sect or body of citizens..” (About ADL. ADL.
Retrieved on 2007-05-28).
The ADL was formed in response to the Leo Frank controversy. Frank was a Jewish
factory manager who lived in the state of Georgia. He was convicted of the 1913
rape of rape and murder of Mary Phagan. To this day, there are those who believe
Frank was guilty or innocent of the crime. The Governor of Georgia reviewed the
evidence and decided that Leo Frank was innocent. He commuted his sentence to
life in imprisonment, but vigilantes kidnapped him from prison and lynched him.
Of course, I don’t agree with a mob killing Leo Frank at all. Anti-Semitism was
really bad then and now. The following is the smoking gun evidence that the AntiDefamation League don’t have the interest of Jewish people in heart. Author Anton
Chaitkan wrote that Cyrus Adler worked with the B’nai B’rith and the New York
Times to destroy all U.S. political actions against Adolf Hitler in Germany. Adler
was the President of the American Jewish Committee. Chaitkan goes a step
further by saying that B’nai B’rith (who invented the ADL) was deliberately left
open by Hitler to function under Nazi rule from 1933. Two days after the cable
from Erich Warburg to Frederick Warburg, on March 31, 1933, the American-Jewish
Committee (controlled by the Warburgs) and the B'nai B'rith, issued a formal,
official joint statement of the two organizations. This statement counseled “that no
American boycott against Germany be encouraged,” and advising “that no further
mass meetings be held or similar forms of agitation be employed.” This is proven by
THE UNAUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY” as found in the link of:
Hitler closed down B’nai B’rith’s Nazi authorized German operations in 1938.
Only in 1939 that the B’nai B’rith boycotted against the Nazi Regime. The
American Jewish Congress (with Jacob Chaitkan as legal director of the boycott
against the Nazis), the American Federation of Labor, and other groups opposed
the B’nai B’rith’s Nazi supporting ways. While legitimate Jewish people went along
with black people to fight for civil rights, the ADL was working in cahoots with the
FBI to infiltrate and try to harm anti-war plus civil rights groups during the 1960’s.
According to Hunter Gray, a civil rights worker, the ADL put the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee, labor unions, Native American groups, Chicano,
Black, and Asian rights groups as “subversive organizations.”
Today, the ADL is working with the FBI still to investigate “terrorism” after 9/11.
Despite giving out the Free Speech “Torch of Liberty” award, they hate free
speech that they don’t like. They forced St. Martin’s Press into canceling their
contract with David Irving. Even though Irving is wrong about his opinions on the
Holocaust as almost a myth, he has a right to show his opinions without threats and
violence. The article called “ADL-America’s Most Powerful Hate Group” reported
more of the ADL’s corruption. The article says that one of the ADL’s sources was
Roy Bullock, a person who collected information and provided it to the ADL as a
secretly-paid independent contractor over 32 years. In the article, it shown that in
April 8, 1993, San Francisco and LA ADL offices were raided for suspected wrong
doing. The police wanted evidence. The Attorney General of San Francisco, Arlo
Smith, said that it was ‘the biggest network of espionage working on a national
scale.’ Two reporters of the ‘San Francisco Chronicle’, Phillip Matier and Andrew
Ross, wrote that the A.D.L.’s dossier in San Francisco, seized by the Los Angeles
police, is ‘only the tip of the iceberg of a national system of espionage and
indiscretions programmed by the security services’. The two journalists also state
that ‘policemen from at least other six cities are equally involved in the sale of
confidential police files.’ Another practice used by the A.D.L. is to infiltrate in
American groups or parties. The raids had evidence of the ADL’s support of stealing
confidential police files from CA police departments. Also, these raids revealed that
Bullock’s computer had filed on 9,876 individuals and more than 950 groups across
the political spectrum. Many of Bullock's files concerned groups that did not fit the
mold of extremist groups, hate groups, and organizations hostile to Jews or Israel
that the ADL would usually be interested in. These groups include: data on the
NAACP, the African National Congress (ANC), the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU), the United Auto Workers, Jews for Jesus, Nancy Pelosi, etc. The ADL denied
knowing the extent of Bullock’s files. The San Francisco district attorney at the time
accused the ADL of conducting a national spy network", but dropped all accusations
a few months later. Other groups sued the ADL for privacy violations. The ADL
agreed to pay $175,000 for the court costs of the groups that sued it, promised that it
would not seek information from sources it knew could not legally disclose such
information. In 2007, Abraham Foxman came under criticism for his stance on the
Armenian Genocide. Foxman had opposed calls for the U.S. Government to recognize
the Armenian murders by Muslim extremists (including the Domneh) as a
"genocide.” Of course, the Armenian suffering was a genocide by Turkish
extremists. August, 17, 2007, the ADL fired its regional New England director, Andrew
H. Tarsy, for breaking ranks with the main organization and saying the ADL should
recognize the genocide. Later, the ADL had no choice, but to admit that the
Armenians indeed suffered genocide in the early 1900’s.
It’s a historical fact that the ADL has been linked to organized crime, especially Las
Vegas mafia boss Lansky (according to the late William Cooper). Pornographer
Hugh Hefner was honored by the ADL in its “Torch of Freedom” award. Obscene
pornographer Larry Flynt sent the ADL $100,000. Some criticized the ADL for
equated dissent with Israeli policies as almost chose to anti-Semitism (like Michael
Lerner and Noam Chomsky). Many US presidents, such as Truman, Eisenhower, J.
Kennedy, Johnson and Reagan have praised the A.D.L.
The ADL is radically socially liberal. Even the conservative Jewish organization
called Jews for Morality exposed this extremist far-left ADL before. Orthodox Rabbi
Daniel Lapin has charged:
“…The most deeply held values of the ADL are a hatred of Judaism and
Christianity—and a secularization of society..”
Tons of Jewish people don’t like the ADL’s demonization of conservative
Christians on numerous occasions. In the Jews for Morality’s articles, the ADL
works closely with homosexual lobbies in D.C. and instate capitols. The ADL
works with pro-abortion groups and the gun control lobby. They also work with
the American Civil Liberties Union and the People for the American Way, which
are all right on civil liberties and opposing torture. Yet, they want to restrict
voluntary religious expression from the schools and the public square, which are
100% wrong. These radical actions are agitating real anti-Semitism instead of
trying to stop it. The ADL is also promoting Hate Crime Legislation laws. I have
no problem with laws to stop harassment, violence, or terrorizing groups of
people, but the ADL now wants free speech that they hate to be included in the
list as well. The free speech they want banned are words against abortion, dissent
of homosexuality, and promotion of Christian values.
On February 20, 2002, Landsdowne, PA mayor Jayne Young said that Landsdowne’s
Borough officials signed an ADL “no place for hate” program. The ADL is trying to
indoctrinate the citizens of that town that Christian dissent with homosexuality is
not only “homophobia” (which is false) and a “psychiatric disorder” (a lie), but
“hate” (another lie). Is this a twilight zone or what? This is part of the thought police
craze attempting to intimidate Bible Believers. In July 21, 2004, Michael Marcavage
(a young Christian activist) spoke on a microscope in opposition to homosexuality
as against God’s law. He tried to read from the Bible, but was prevented since the
President of the Council called the Bible “hate speech.” The Bible and all men should
hate evil and hating evil is perfectly normal. Michael was assaulted by one council
member and the Landsowne police chief for no reason. He had to face 15 months in
jail plus or $2,800.00 fine.
Lynee Abraham, District Attorney of Philadelphia and a national executive board
member of the ADL gave the order to arrest Michael on October 10, 2004. On
February 17, 2005, the great news is that the judge threw the ADL’s case out and the
Landsdowne borough threw out the charges. The ADL are still trying to have “hatefree zones” in America. The Anti-Defamation League is promoting HR 2662
providing federal protection and prosecution for hate crimes involving “real or
perceived gender identity.” What’s that? It means that if a person perceives that a
person is a transvestite or “female impersonator” and say “I’m going to hurt you
woman,” you can be charged for a hate crime. This is in America with a felony (no
less than 5 years in federal prison). This has nothing to do with stopping violence
against anyone since people being violent toward anyone because of their sexual
orientation is wrong. Laws already exist that ban violence toward anyone for any
reason in America. It has to do with censorship of free speech. Ted Pike is one man
exposing the hate crime agenda. Though I don’t agree with Pike’s views on Israel
slightly, he is right on the extremism of the ADL. The Anti-Defamation League
isn’t about helping Jewish people, but it’s is about spying, censorship, infiltrating,
intimidation, and an anti-Christian agenda (since Abe Foxman even oppose
voluntary conversions of Jewish people to Christianity). The ADL is very
radically anti-gun. The ADL supported the District of Columbia before the US
Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller which argued that the city's ban on
the possession of handguns and any functional firearms, even for self-defense in the
home is not prohibited by the Second Amendment. The Jews for the Perservation
of Firearms Ownership have supported gun rights. They oppose the ADL on the
Second Amendment.
Here’s more of the ADL’s slander of Patriots. As we know, James von Brunn was an
evil, anti-Semitic murder of a security guard at the Holocaust museum. Now, the
Anti-Defamation League and their allies are exploiting this tragedy (and others)
as an excuse to promote an attack on the First Amendment on the internet.
Christopher Wolf, chair of the Anti-Defamation League’s Internet Task Force and
Immediate Past Chair of the International Network Against Cyber-Hate wrote about
paranoia about haters in Web 2.0. Web 2.0 deals with communications from socialnetworking site, video-sharing sites, wikis, and blogs. The fact is that haters will
exist regardless if the Internet exist or not. Censorship is not an answer to confront
haters, but debate, protests, and any legitimate means to decrease any form of
bigotry in the world. Now, the ADL tried to compare Poplawski’s view to Alex
Jones. I don’t even agree with Jones on every issue, but even I realize that Alex Jones
had nothing to do with the murderer of Richard Paplawski. This attack against
conservatives, libertarians, Patriots, etc. have come under the the Department of
Homeland Security’s “Rightwing Extremism” document. The DHS conflated white
supremacists with activists opposed to gun control, abortion, and illegal immigration. An
earlier report issued by the Missouri Information Analysis Center specifically denoted Ron
Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr supporters as potentially dangerous terrorists. The MIAC
report also concentrated on white supremacists and militia groups. Some have accused the
South Poverty Law Center (SPLC) or the ADL as being responsible for spreading the MIAC
slanderous report. Missouri authorities later rescinded the MIAC report. This isn’t unusual
since on April 22, DHS Secretary Napolitano appeared before the Anti-Defamation League
National Leadership Conference in Washington. In a speech, she said that “the ADL and
DHS have had some good partnerships. In recent years, the Department has placed our
employees in your advanced training school to educate us on the tactics used by extremists
and terrorists.”
Napolitano even admits that the DHS are linked to the ADL. The Anti-Defamation League in
my eyes are just as much as intelligence agency as the DHS or the FBI. The ADL’s Deborah
Lauter is a liar and said that the DHS report was spot on when it compared returning veterans
to terrorists basically. She acts like we can’t have any discussion about disagreeing with
illegal immigration or opposing the evil of abortion at all. Attorney General Eric Holder
wants a new hate crimes law as well. Abe Foxman once again slander 9/11 truth people
as being a belief system of anti-Semites. The truth is that real 9/11 Truth individuals
aren’t anti-Semites. Some anti-Semites are vegetarians. That doesn’t mean that
vegetarians are representative of anti-Semites. Foxman said that he wants to
confront us since people like us believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Well, we
welcome the discussion and we won’t back down from the likes of the ADL. 9/11
Truth is not equivalent to anti-Semitism at all since we don’t hate Jewish people or
Arabic people. Even neo-conservative Glen Beck said that 9/11 Truthers want to
destroy America and are just like Al-Qaeda. This slander is so bad that one person
(who is in the 911 Truth Movement) is suing Glen Beck for defamation. Christopher
Wolf wants the Internet to get rid of “hate speech” (which can be ambiguous
because speeches from Hitler can be banned and that can be used in a research
project) along with more filters. Others have suggested more draconian measures.
For instance another CBS scribe, Bonnie Erbe, has demanded the state start
“rounding up promoters of hate before they kill.” So, the real extremists promoting
violations of free speech and individual liberty are the DHS, the ADL, and the SPLC
not us.
President Barack Obama signed the The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes
Prevention Act on October 28, 2009. Attorney General Holder was one of the greatest
supporters of this bill and now it’s a law. People like Rev. Ted Pike believe that the
passage of the law was stage two in “a massive national campaign to train lawyers to
become hate crimes prosecutors.” Pike believes that the bill will be used against people
who peacefully disagree with homosexuality or are critics of Israel (even though I don’t hate
Israel as a nation. I just disagree with some policies of the Israeli government and other
Middle Eastern nations like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, etc.). Holder promised to begin using
the act the moment it became law. Of course for years, Eric Holder (who covered up
Clinton’s murder at Waco, TX in April 19, 1993. This was when 76 people at
least died including more than 20 children and 2 pregnant women) holds onto a
close relationship with the Anti-Defamation League. He admitted that: “…I first began
convening meetings with members of the ADL in the early 90’s when I served as the
United States Attorney in Washington, D.C…The Obama Administration could ask no
better partner than the Anti-Defamation League as we jointly strive to attain the
ideals of equal opportunity, equal rights, and equal justice for all. Members of the
ADL — I salute you.” Holder said, according to a transcript of his October 17 speech. The
ADL definitely will have no problem targeting. The ADL still lies and compared white
supremacists and other racists to legitimate conservative/libertarian people. Other ADL
targets include the Oath Keepers and Three Percenters, who are according to the ADL “both
part of an anti-government extremist movement that has grown since President Obama took
office, promote the idea that the federal government is plotting to take away the rights of
American citizens and must be resisted. The two groups are apparently trying to make inroads
in the U.S. military,” a mischaracterization that plays right into the DHS “rightwing
extremism” document that claims returning veterans pose a violent threat. According to the
ADL, Joe Banister, Tommy Cryer, Pat Shannan, Dave Von Kleist, Jack McLamb, Greg
Dixon, Ted Gunderson, and Michael Badnarik are “extremist speakers” who also pose a
threat to the country. Of course this is a lie since these people aren’t a threat to America at all.
The so-called Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Hate Crimes Prevention Act will be used
against people who criticize homosexuality. It will also be used to go after individuals and
organizations the Anti-Defamation League has targeted for intimidation, elimination of their
liberties, and censorship. People have a right to peacefully agree or disagree with lifestyle
choices in U.S. society.
The leadership of the Anti-Defamation League is strong pro-abortion. Much
evidence conclusively manifests this point. proves that the ADL
monitors even peaceful pro-life organizations like the Human Life International and
associate them with the shooting of abortionists. They call them extremists for
comparing the slaughtering of the unborn to the Nazi Holocaust. The ADL are liars
since butchering unborn babies in the womb is like a Holocaust. It’s murder and
destruction. The ADL attacks conservative Jewish people for ideological reasons like
radio talk show host Dr. Laura Schlessinger. In fact, Carl Pearlston, a member of the
ADL for 25 years wrote recently in the Jewish World Review that he was booted off
the ADL's Executive Committee and Regional Board for not towing the ADL's leftist
agenda. Pearlston laments that the ADL was "turning Judaism on its head." The
ADL supported partial birth abortion in their amicus brief as the friend of the court
back in 2000. What more proof do the skeptics need?
Appendix A: Sabbaetean/Frankist Link to the new world order
I want to make it perfectly clear that not all Jewish people are evil like this. Many
Jewish people are righteous and respect God’s commandments. This is just a
connection to expose evil influences among some Jewish people (and non-Jewish
people) involved in the new world order. I want to make that clear. Rabbi Antelman
in his books “To Eliminate The Opiate Volumes I and II” discusses this issue in
depth. Few talk about the Sabbateans. Now, many Jewish apostates existed from
their captivity in Babylon (plus before that time). Ultimately, this apostasy comes
from the Luciferian Mystery Religion of Babylon. Afterwards, they formed the
Midrash and Talmud, which were manmade interpretations of the Torah. Jesus
condemned them for doing that by saying that your man-made tradition violates the
commandments of God. In other words, Jesus meant that these man made works
have nothing to do with the Word of God. Later, one apostate was Sabbeatzi Tvzi of
the 1600's. He was in Turkey and was banned by Orthodox Jewish people.
Therefore, this Turkish Jewish person was spewing anti-Jewish propaganda. The
reason was that Tvzi called himself the Messiah, which was false. Sabbeatzi Tvzi was
arrested by the Turkish Sultan in September of 1666. The Kabbalist Sabbeatzi Tvzi
was so deceived that he would later convert into Islam. Later, his followers
formed the Sabbeateans (and the Frankists named after Jacob Frank). Another
man who was instrumental in the lives of the followers of the Bavarian Illuminati
(one example is how Bavarian Illuminati member Karl von Hessen-Kassel had
contact with Frankism according to Terry Melanson) was Jakob Frank.
Jacob Frank was a Polish born Jew. Numerous Frankists and Sabbeateans would
become Satanists according to Fritz Springmeier. His family name was originally
Leibowicz. He lived in the German city of Offenbach and was the leader of the secret
Jewish Cabala at that time. Frank was into the occult and hated the Torah. He
believed in antinomianism and sexual orgies. Jacob Frank was the 18th century
Jewish religious leader who claimed to be the reincarnation of the self-proclaimed
messiah Sabbatai Zevi and also of King David (while claiming to accept enlightenment
principles). Jacob Frank’s father was a Sabbatean, and moved to Chernivtsi,, in the
Austro-Hungarian region of Bukovina in 1730. This is where the Sabbatean influence
at the time was strong. Frank rejected the Talmud. Jacob would be excommunicated
again by the Orthodox Jewish people. The Vatican supported many Sabbateans,
because the Sabbeateans felt that the Kabbalah (and Zohar, which they followed)
validated the existence of the Trinity. Dembowsky, the Catholic Bishop of
Kamenetz-Podolsk, protected the Sabbateans. By 1757 an edict from Augustus III of
Poland guaranteeing them safety. By the late 1700’s, Jacob Frank would convert to
Roman Catholicism. Hence, Jacob Frank became a Roman Catholic. This proves a
Vatican/Sabbatean connection. It confirms what many anti-Jesuits researchers have
been saying all along that Frankists were pro-Vatican. Frank himself was baptized in
Lwów (September 17, 1759) and again in Warsaw the next day, with Augustus III as
his godfather. Frank's baptismal name was "Joseph" (Józef). By 1790, 26,000 Frankists
were recorded baptized in Poland. He died in 1791. Some Frankists were involved in
the French Revolution since they viewed Napoleon Bonaparte a Messiah figure.
Soon, the Frankists (who would try to infiltrate the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim
religions) would influence the creation of the Reform Movement. Now, according to
Rabbi Antelman, Moses Mendelssohn was the father of the Haskala Movement or
the Reform Movement. Moses lived in the late 1700's. Moses' disciple was Marcus
Herz. Many of these pro-Frankist/Reform Jews united with the Bavarian
Illuminati. The Reform Jewish people help invented the B'nai B'rith Lodge of
Masonry (formed in 1843), the ADL, and Labor Zionism.
The Rothschild family has been related to Freemasonry and the elite for centuries.
The Rothschilds aren’t originally Rothschilds. Their real name was Bauer or Hahn.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild was the first major person of this family. He was born
in 1744 at Frankfurt am Main, Germany, one of eight children of Amschel Moses
Rothschild (d. 1755) and his wife Schönche Rothschild née Lechnich (d. 1756). Mayer
was apprenticed to the banking firm of Jakob Wolf Oppenheim in Hamburg,
returning to business in Frankfurt in 1763. He became a dealer in rare coins and won
the patronage of Crown Prince Wilhelm of Hesse, gaining the title of "Court Factor.”
Later, his sons became power bankers in Europe from England, Germany, Italy, etc.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild was the founder of the Rothschild bank in England. In
2005, he was ranked 7th on the Forbes magazine list of the “The Twenty Most
Influential Businessmen Of All Time.” The business magazine referred to him as a
"founding father of international finance.” The Rothschild family would fund both
sides of various wars, be apart of Freemasonry (in the Masonic reference book of
“10,000 Famous Freemasons“ Vol. 4, pg. 74 James Meyer Rothschild and his
brother Nathan Meyer Rothschild were Masons. James Rothschild in Paris was a
33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemasons and his brother Nathan was in the London
Lodge of Emulation. Both brothers are sons of Amschel Rothschild), have an
alliance with the Vatican, and fund the creation of Israel is huge ways (including
Jacob Schiff). The Rothschild’s famous logo was a double-headed eagle on a red
shield. Rothschild is German for Red Shield. The Double headed represents dualism
and equilibrium (along with others meanings). It existed for thousands of years from
the Hittites, the Roman Empire, and the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Also, the
Rothschilds wore a Knight of Malta cross on their clothing. Today in 2009, the
Rothschild family supports the global warming hysteria movement. For example,
Rothschild Australia and E3 International want to take the lead in the international
carbon credit trading market. Richard Martin, the chief executive officer of
Rothschild Australia said, "With recent developments in international climate change
policy, the question is no longer if, but when the global carbon trading market will
emerge. Rothschild Australia, through Carbon Ring, intends to be at the forefront of
this market, providing private investment vehicles to companies seeking to offset
their greenhouse gas emissions liabilities." N M Rothschild & Sons supports similar
programs as well. New development refute the man made global warming hoax (in
hundreds of smoking guns alone). The leader of the environmental organization
Greenpeace Gerd Leipold admits he lied about global warming causing ice to melt
in the Arctic by 2030. Indeed, it was discovered that during August 2007 to August
2008, Arctic ice had in fact grown by around 30 per cent, an area equivalent to the
size of Germany. A new peer reviewed study has also discovered, “Total annual
precipitation in Greenland ice sheet for 1958-2007 to be up to 24% and surface mass
balance up to 63% higher than previously thought.”
There has been more information exposing the Sabbateans and the Donmeh. The
Domneh were the Turkish offshoots of the Sabbeateans. Many have called the
Donmeh as using a combination of Jewish and Muslim influences in the
cosmology of their organization. Domneh means turncoats to the Turks since the
Ottoman Empire didn't trust the Donmeh people. Some trace the Donmeh's
dogma to Sabbatai Zevi. Zevi was a Turkish Jewish false prophet. He deceived a
lot of people (in Turkey and Southeastern Europe) and then was exposed as a fraud
during the 1600's. Later, his followers influenced the development of the
Frankists, Sabbeateans, and apostate people. Thessaloniki was a famous place of
the Domneh faith. This faith had Jewish rites at home, while they had the Islamic
rites of Ramandan, mosques, and made pilgrimages to Mecca. Jewish people and
Muslims called the Domneh as heretics. Radical Muslims, Freemasons and the
Domneh were key in orchestrating the Armenian genocide in the early 1900‘s.
Secret societies like Freemasons and even some of the Domneh were involved in the
Turkish Revolution that more secularized the nation of Turkey. These secret orders
wanted to eliminate the Sunni Muslims out of the Ottoman Empire. This is
similar to the Masonic French Revolution of 1789 wanting to get rid of the
monarchs. Sahir Talat Akev of the Kapanci-Izmir group of Donme was the Grand
Master of the Masons until his death in 1999. The Bektashi Order according to
Fleming could influence the founding of the Shriners. The Shriners swear an oath
to Allah to join. The Shriners are made up of high level Freemasons. Troy believed
that the Domneh (or remnants of the Frankist/Sabbaeteans) had connections with
the Ottoman Turkish Freemasonry (derived from the Rite of Memphis), which
associated with Rudolf von Sebottendorf. Sebottendorf would be a leading Thule
Society member & he founded the German Workers Party which Hitler turned into
the Nazis.
Many Nazis had Jewish blood like Ritter von Strauss, Alfred Rosenberg (who was
half-Jewish), and Heydrich (Many Nazis also collaborated with Labor Zionists in
order to try to force Jewish people into Israel. One book proving this information is
entitled “Perfidy” as written by Ben Hecht. Edwin Black's book called the "The
Transfer Agreement," document more evidence of this). The Transfer Agreement is
Edwin Black's compelling, award-winning story of a negotiated arrangement in 1933
between Zionist organizations and the Nazis to transfer some 50,000 Jews, and $100
million of their assets, to Palestine in exchange for stopping the worldwide Jewishled boycott threatening to topple the Hitler regime in its first year. The book’s
updated edition includes the author's stunning new introduction and a powerful
new after word by Anti-Defamation League national director Abraham H. Foxman.
The mediator of the Nazis and the Jewish agency for the “Transfer Agreement” was
Chaim Zrolorov according to Barry Chamish. He was murdered on the beach in Tel
Aviv. The Revisionists were blamed for it and the Revisionists were booted out of
the Labor Zionists organizations. Another book entitled, “Adolf Hitler, Founder of
Israel” (It was written by HENNEKE KARDEL. I don’t agree with everything in this
book though) has a source on this information:
“…The cooperation which existed between Heydrich’s Gestapo and the Jewish self
defense league in Palestine, the militant Haganah, would not have been closer if it
was not for Eichamn who made it public.... The commander of Haganah was Feivel
Polkes, born in Poland, with whom in February 1937 the S. D. trooper leader Adolph
Eichman met in Berlin in a wine restaurant Traube (Grape) near the zoo. These two
Jews made a brotherly agreement. Polkes, the underground fighter, got in writing
this assurance from Eichman: “A body representing Jews in Germany, will exert
pressure of those leaving Germany emigrate only to Palestine. Such a policy is in the
interest of Germany and will be executed by the Gestapo…”
According to Dr. Henry Makow, Adolph Eichmann created agricultural training
camps in Austria to prepare young Jewish people for Kibbutz life. Eichmann visited
Israel and talked with Zionist leaders about their expansionist goals. There was even
talk of a strategic alliance between Nazi Germany and Jewish Palestine. There was
the HAAVARA AGREEMENT. This contract was between the Third Reich authority and
Zionist Authority benefiting the interests of both parties. Haavara was intended to promote
both the emigration of German Jews and the export of German products to Palestine. The
outbreak of war in September 1939 ended the transfer practice. This report is in Himmler’s
Archives. In 1921, Winston Churchill supported another White Paper, which limited
Jewish immigration, but agreed to have Jewish immigration. Winston Churchill
opposed the 1939 MacDonald White Paper. That limited Jewish immigration into
Israel by 75,000 in 5 years (and Arabic people will determine more immigration into
Franklin Roosevelt even prevented Jewish people from living in America during
World War Two. When NY Governor Lehman opposed FDR's court-packing
scheme, FDR said to reporters: "What else could you expect from a Jew?" He also
told King Ibn Saud of Saudi Arabia in February 1945 that the only offer he might
give him was the six million Jews in the US (FDR thereby proposed the murder of all
US Jewish people). FDR is more than a traitor than I though. He didn’t just have
foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor and did nothing to help our troops. He was anti gun,
he supported Stalin, he wanted a War on Drugs, he issued illegal concentration
camps against American citizens, and he enacted the New Deal (which the Supreme
Court even said that some parts of it was unconstitutional). Even on November 25th,
1940, pro-Labor Zionists blew up and sank the Patra, which carried Jews escaping
from Nazi Europe; the pro-Labor Zionists killed 252 people. In Holocaust Victims
Accuse (1977), available on line, Rabbi Moshe Shonfeld says some Zionists sabotaged
many attempts to organize resistance, ransom and relief. They undermined an effort
by Vladimir Jabotinsky to arm Jews before the war. They stopped an attempt to send
food to the ghettos. Dr. Makow says the Zionist Rabbi of Sweden, Dr. Ehrenpreis,
scuttled a Swedish attempt to rescue 10,000 Jews. Pro-Labor Zionists torpedoed a
similar attempt by the British parliament. Weizmann and the other Jewish
establishment leaders organized Jewish traitor patrols on the coastline of Israel to
assist the British in keeping out "illegal" Jewish men, women and children who
sought refuge from the claws of the Nazis. In Barry Chamish’s “Save Israel!”
(Modiin, Modiin House, Israel), he writes (p. 350): “. . . Chaim Weizmann knew the
results of the Holocaust ahead of time and deliberately allowed the slaughter to take
place. He . . . turned Jewish leaders into mass murderers . . . . He was sending official
proclamations to Jewish leaders worldwide, not to try and save their co-religionists
in Europe . . . .” Finally, in Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism and the Holocaust, which
was published also by Modiin, Barry Chamish writes (on pg. 232) that, about a year
before he became Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon said that had Jabotinsky
been head of the Jewish Agency instead of Ben-Gurion, millions of Jews would have
been saved from the Holocaust. Perfidy, TheTransfer Agreement , and The Scared
And The Doomed are accurate books (which were created by Jewish people, not
anti-Semite bigots) that detail how Labor Zionism prevented the rescue of European
Jewry. According to Barry Chamish:
“…Sharett served in the Ottoman army in WW1. Ben Gurion gave up Russian
citizenship for Ottoman citizenship, something many others in Palestine were afraid
to do. Israeli Presidents Ben Zvi, Zalman Shazar and to a lesser degree Yitzchak
Navon became students of Ottomanism…”
It is important to point out that the vast majority of the world Jewish community
opposed Nazi Germany because it was controlled by the Nazis. Also, Muslim
radicals (not all Muslims) collaborated with the Nazis to kill Jewish people. So, the
Nazis worked with both sides of the Labor Zionists and the Muslim radicals in a
Hegelian Dialetic in order to promote their new world order. You have to thank
God that the Nazis didn’t fulfill their goals totally. The Nazis utilized the Vatican’s
Knights of Malta funded corporations to murder people millions of people in WWII.
In fact, some of the leading members of the Nazi movement in Germany were
Roman Catholics like Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Joseph Goebells, and Joseph
Mengele. Papal Rome had a key role in starting World War Two. Ultimately, WWII
pacified Germany completely. This isn't all Jewish people, but a wicked few. These
wicked Zionists are typically pro-Socialist/Communist and anti-liberty according to
Alan Stang. It's like not all Americans are involved in the Iraq War, but American
leaders carried it out.
33rd Degree Freemason Brothers Harry S. Truman and Chaim Weizmann
After WWII, Israel was created in 1948 (Its logo was a symbol of the Magen David,
which looks similar to a Hexagram. The Hexagram is known in witchcraft as
representing the yani or female or lingam or masculine principles in generation. It
has multiple meaning as well). I would say that Jewish people and Arabic people
have a right to leave in Israel in tranquility. I respect the real, honorable
contributions of Jewish people and Arabic people. Secret orders were crucial in
Israel’s development. A picture shows 33rd Degree Freemasons Harry Truman
and Chaim Weizzman. Truman is holding a Torah. Truman expressed distain for
Jewish people, but united with the man for the sake of the Brotherhood. Harry S.
Truman would have a meteoric rise in power via Tom Prendergast (who was a
political boss). Prendergast was the head of organized crime in Kansas City.
Truman was the executor of the dropping of bombs in Japan when the Japanese
were about to surrender to the Americans. Weizzman was a traitor for his own
people for not only allowing Polish Jewish people to die in the Holocaust, but he
said point blank: "Millions of Jews are dust on the wheels of history that will have to
be blown away. They must accept their fate. We do not want them crowding into our
Tel Aviv, turning it into a low-grade ghetto," Weizmann (who was pro-Socialist.
Chaim Weizmann was the President of the so-called World Zionist Organization
and the Jewish Agency. Another traitor was David Ben-Gurion, worked together
with the British to prevent Jews from entering the Land of Israel in the 1940s to
escape Hitler's inferno in Europe) told the New Judea magazine in its Fall 1937
issue. Ironically, Chaim Weizmann would be the first President of the nation of
Israel. In 1958, former Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharett said at a memorial:
“Sometimes it is necessary to sacrifice the few in order to save the many.”
Also, according to Barry Chamish's research, a Reform Jewish man named
Stephen Wise (an ally of a Roman Catholic Bishop named Francis T. McConnell)
didn't do all he could to allow Jewish immigration into America during WWII.
According to Rabbi Antelman, Rabbi Stephen Wise was the head of the Reform
Movement in the United States. Jesuit-trained Patrick Cardinal Hayes of New
York controlled McConnell. Barry Chamish accused Wise of being a Communist.
Both Truman and Weizmann allowed Israel to be created. So, many Jewish people
were traitors to their people by allowing Jewish people to be murder to the sake of
creating and ruling Israel. Israel does have a right to exist (Jewish people, Arabic
people, and all people have a right to live in Israel), but not at the expense of killing
innocent people at all. Before Israel's creation in 1948, various Aliyahs existed. An
Aliyah is a big migration period among Jewish people into Israel. Theodore Herzl
helped pushed Zionism into the next level. Zionism isn't monolithic and are divided
into many camps (like Revisionist, Orthodox, Labor Zionist, pro-Jesuit apostate
Christian Zionism, and Biblical Zionism). Revisionist Zionism is interesting to me.
Now, it was invented by Vladimir Jabotinsky and he wanted an Israeli state for
Jewish people. He hated Ben Gurion since Ben Gurion was a blatant puppet of the
West and he didn't do enough to save Jews from the Holocaust (even Barry Chamish
exposes Ben Gurion). Jabotinsky endorsed the Irgun instead of the Hagana. He has
alleged to said in 1934 that: "...Arabs will participate on an equal footing
throughout all sectors of the country's public life….In every cabinet where the
prime minister is a Jew, the vice-premiership shall be offered to an Arab and vice
versa..." Vladimir died of a "heart attack" in 1940.
After the Balfour Declaration (It was signed in November of 1917. Its supporters
include Weizzmann, James de Rothschild, Mr. Sokolow, Dr. Tchlenow, Mr. Sacher,
Greenberg, etc.), many Arabic people rejected an idea of an Israeli state. Ironically,
some Arabic people instead supported a homeland for Jews. For example, Emir
Faisel (in 1919) wrote a letter to Freemason Felix Frankfurter supporting Zionism,
"We Arabs...wish the Jews a most hearty welcome." Other Jewish people endorsing a
Jewish homeland was 33° Freemason Louis Brandeis (a Supreme Court Justice) and
33° Freemason Edmund Rothschild. Many Israelis are righteous and some aren't.
Many Ashkenazi Labor Zionists killed thousands of Sephardic and Yemeni Jews
(some of them were discriminated against in Israel because of their skin color and
physical appearance. Let’s be blunt here) via x-Rays in the 20th century. The
Sephardim were very religious and traditional. This was written about by the
Israeli patriot Barry Chamish. Not to mention that the Sephardim were oppressed
by many Muslim nations in the 1940‘s and the 1950‘s. There is also the hidden
oppression of Israeli Christians in Israel and Christians being abused in Egypt
(and other nations of the Middle East). One secret group harassing Christians is
called the militantly Orthodox Lubavitch Chabad organization. They have a
headquarters in Eastern Parkway at Brooklyn, New York. The Lubavitch Chabad
are known for educating people about Judaism worldwide and building facilities.
Some of them follow the Kabbalah. They want to enforce the Noahide Laws and
make Jewish people to just accept the Torah (when the Torah is only apart of the
Word of God). The Noahide Laws are a theocratic agenda where certain rules are
followed. They are a set of seven moral imperatives that, according to the Talmud
(which is man made tradition, not the Word of God), were given by God to Noah as
a binding set of laws for all mankind. Bush Sr. signed a law with the Lubavitch
Chabad in support of these laws. Notice that the ACLU didn’t protest this as a
“seperation of church and state.” The Chabad also supports the Left gatekeeper
Alan Dershowitz. Dershowitz supports torture like a neo conservative. They have
been involved in court battles to publicly display a Menorah, which I don’t have
problem with. Adherents of the Noahide Laws are often called B'nei Noach
(Children of Noah) or "Noahides" and may often network in Jewish synagogues.
Many of these rules are legitimate, but the catch is that there is a theocratic judiciary
to handle these rules. Some believe that these laws target Christians since the law
forbids worshipping a man as God (Now, Christians worship Jesus as God, so the
Noahide Laws would be against that since it’s supported by pro-Orthodox Jewish
people). Pam Schuffert writes that the Lubavitch Chahad acted violently toward
missionaries and especially Messanic Jewish believers. To be fair, many
unjustified acts of violence have occurred against the Lubavitch Chabad as well.
So, the Lubavitch Chabad needs the real Gospel.
Many of the Jewish elites are CFR members like Paul Wolfowitz, Egdar Bronfman (who
is part of the World Jewish Congress. Edgar is one of the most powerful Jewish people in
the world), and Wolfenson. Israeli writer Barry Chamish confirms this in his many
books. The Anti-Defamation League has the Cardinal Bea Interfaith Award making a
Papal link to the group. Israel today is controlled and influenced by those in America
and Europe (That is why Israelis and other Middle Eastern leaders are members of
Papal Knighthoods, some are bounded under the Vatican, some are Jesuit-trained, and
they are under control by foreign powers. Bashar al-Assad is a member of the Vatican‘s
Order of Francis I. He’s the President of Syria). Foreign powers control Middle Eastern
policies in a heavy degree to the detriment of the Jewish and Arabic people that live
there. Many Jews and Arabs living there are followers of God. Hence, these Labor
Zionists are controlled by the Vatican elite, high level Freemasonry, and the Pilgrims.
One example of this is how Jesuit-trained leader Shimon Peres supported the Vatican
Accords and the EU/CFR-backed Olso Accords. That is why Rabbi David Rosen was
made a member of Papal Order of St Gregory. Some of the Labor Zionists (and their
allies, who are the ideological descendants of the Sabbateans) want to work with others
to reconstruct Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem.
What’s the deal? The deal is that as Rabbi Marvin Antelman proves, occultists and
evil people have tried to infiltrate Torah Judaism (including some in Fundamental
Christianity) in order to destroy it and form a new world order (This is similar to
John 19:15 when apostate Jewish people said “We have no King, but Caesar“ being
traitors to their own Jewish people). They cypto-Frankist Sabbatain Labor Zionists
serve the Vatican/Jesuit network. There is a remnant of believers in God that will
never submit to the evil of the internationalists. The murder of Jewish people,
Christians, Muslims, etc. have been done by globalists for a very long time. Also,
Zionism isn’t monolithic. Some Zionists are peaceful and love God. Other Zionists
are indeed wicked, pro-Socialist/Communist, and have done evil deeds for decades.
These evil Labor Zionists (and their cousins like the Kadima Party or the Likud
Party) are apart of the new world order system. The deal is that we have a fair
approach in the Middle East. We should never embrace dual citizenship or have
unconditional support for any nation in the Middle East at all. Both sides ought to
solve their own problems ultimately. We should expose and oppose all evil. Yet, we
should be meek to all. Yet, we ought to show love to all human beings irrespective
of their background.
Appendix B: Arthur Koestler
Arthur Koestler was not only a traitor to his own Jewish people. He was the one
the pushed the lie that most Jewish people are descendants of the Khazars. The
Khazars are Turkish tribes (with links to Ugrian peoples) who were phallic
worshippers. Their Kings converted to Judaism to trade more efficiently between
Christian and Muslim peoples in the Caucasus region. This area where the
Khazars lived was between the Black and Caspian Sea. Later, the Khazars were
mostly gone by intermarriage with Europeans. Arthur claims that the Ashkenazi
tribes are related to the Khazars completely and therefore are false Jewish people.
The problem with this argument is that Ashkenazi Jewish people existed in
Germany long before the Khazars were in prominence at all. The Khazar Empire
didn't even exist in parts of Eastern Europe. That document of “The Encyclopedia
Britannica,“ Ninth Edition, 1903, Volume XIV, pp. 59-60 outline an accurate
protrayal of the Khazars. The Khazars would trade with the Byzantium Empire.
The Khazars existed from 190 A.D. to 1100 A.D. They reached their peak from 600-
950 A.D. They existed from the Caucasus Mountains. One of their capitals was
Itil. There were merchants from Baghdad, Armenia, and Byzantium that traded
with the city of Itil in honey, wax, furs, and leather. The Encyclopedia said that
there were lighter skinned (or Ak-Khazars) and darker skinned (or Kara-Khazars)
Khazars. One ruling dynasty in ca. 740 adopted Judaism for political and
commercial reasons (the Jewish people inspired on their kings named Bulan to
convert), yet no evidence existed that the majority of the Khazarian people
adopted the Jewish religion at all.
Also, new genetics tests proves that the Ashkenazis are related to the Sephradic,
Yemeni, Lemba, and other real Hebrews tribes today. Even the anti-Semitic
"evolutionary psychologist" Kevin MacDonald admits to this fact in his book “A
People That Shall Dwell Alone,”:
"….Recent genetic studies have con-firmed the genetic integrity of Jewish groups
discussed in Chapter 2 of PTSDA. These studies confirm the Middle Eastern origins
of Jews and show that Jewish groups remained genetically separate from the
peoples they lived among over the last 2000 years. Based on Y-chromosome data,
Hammer et al. (2000) found, that various Jewish populations (Ashkenazi, North
African, Kurdish, Yemenite, and Near Eastern) were not only closely related to each
other, but also closely related to other Middle Eastern groups (Syrians, Lebanese,
Palestinians) and quite separate from European groups. On the assumption that
there have been 80 generations since the founding of the Ashkenazi population, the
rate of genetic admixture with Europeans has been less than half a percent per
generation. This level of genetic admixture is consistent with supposing that there
has been essentially no conversion of Europeans to become mating members of the
Ashkenazi gene pool.
The very low levels of genetic admixture with Europeans may well have come from
clandestine matings and rape. Two other recent Y-chromosome studies also found
that Israeli Jews derive from the Middle Eastern gene pool (Nebel et al. 2000, 2001).
Nebel (2000) found that 70% of the Y chromosomes of Jews and 82% of the Y
chromosomes of Palestinians belong to the same chromosome pool, suggesting a
common ancestry. However, Nebel et al. (2001) found evidence that Jews are even
more closely related to the Kurds. Muslim Kurds were located near Kurdish Jews
and between Sephardic Jews and Ashkenazi Jews. When compared with European
populations, Ashkenazi Jews were more genetically distant from European
populations than they were from Sephardic Jews, and they were also closer to Arab
populations (e.g., Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese). Sephardic Jews were genetically
distant from both Spaniards and North Africans despite having lived among them
for centuries. Indeed, they remain very close to Kurdish Jews, a finding the authors
attribute to genetic continuity with Jews exiled by the Assyrians in 723 B.C. and the
Babylonians in 586 B.C. Kurdish Jews remained closer genetically to Ashkenazi and
Sephardic Jews than to Kurdish Muslims, a truly remarkable finding, since it
indicates no detectable genetic admixture between Kurdish Jews and their hosts
over approximately 2700 years. Finally, despite some differences, there is a great
deal of genetic affinity between Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jewish groups, confirming
the findings of Hammer et al. (2000)…."
Here’s more research on the Khazar issue:
“…The idea has been widely discredited by reputable historians, because the real
history of the Jewish people is far too well documented to sustain such an idea. They
point out that the theory presupposes lots of gentiles assimilating into Jewish society,
the exact opposite of what normally happens where Jew/Gentile intermarriage occurs.
In reality only a tiny number of Khazars converted to Judaism, while far more converted
to Islam and also some to Russian Orthodoxy. The Khazar converts to Judaism had
disappeared by the 14th century, largely by being incorporated into already existing
Jewish communities in Poland. There is also a problem of what happened to the real
Jews who are supposed to have mass-evangelised the Khazars, then disappeared
without trace out of history. 7Many anti-semites quote Koestler as though he were
verbally inspired, thus damning the Jews because they supposedly aren't real Jews.
Whereas the Nazis and those who absurdly called Jews 'Christ-killers' damned them
because they were real Jews! The studies by Hammer et al. shows that the Ashkenazi
Jews really are the same people group as the other Jews, and that there is a common
ancestry for the Cohanim from Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews, so are the last nails in the
coffin for Koestler's idea." (From Genesis correctly predicts Y-Chromosome pattern: Jews and
Arabs shown to be descendants of one man! by Jonathan Sarfati).
This lie about most Jewish people being Khazars was first publicly proposed in
lecture given by Ernest Renan on January 27, 1883, titled "Judaism as a Race and as
It's been established that Jewish people and Arabic people are genetic brothers
and they are closely related (therefore most Jewish people aren't descendants of
Khazars). BBC News on May 10, 2000 reported on how Jewish people and Arabic
share a common genetic heritage spanning back thousands of years. A study used
over 1,300 men in over 30 countries worldwide. The study, published in the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found that Jewish men shared a
common set of genetic signatures with non-Jews from the Middle East, including
Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese. They've used the Y chromosome in their DNAs
to find the relationships. Since many Jewish tribes today are the Lemba, Mizrahim,
Yemeni, Lemba, and other non-Ashkenazi Jewish tribes exist in Israel and they
aren't Khazars at all. The Mizrahim Jewish people were in the Middle East and
North Africa for thousands of years. The Mizrahim lived on the land of present-day
Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Morocco, and Yemen. Many Jewish people living in Israel are
people of color like the Ethiopian Jewish people or the dark brown skin people of
the Yemenite Jews. There are even Iranian and Iraqi Jewish people that migrated
into Israel. According to the Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol, co. 994, Jews were in
Germany as merchants in 321 and 331 A.D. at Cologne. There were Jews in Russia in
the 1st century A.D. and in Pannonia (Yugoslavia) in the 300's. There was a menorah
discovered in Arles in the 100's, 200's, 300's, and 400's A.D. and Jewish communities
all over Europe. There were the Ashkenazim before the Khazars existed (500's A.D.)
These Jews clearly originated from the Jews in the Bible. There are Sephardim,
Ethiopic, sub-Saharan African (i.e. Lemba), Indic, Asian, and other Jewish tribes that
from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, so even if the Ashkenazi Jews aren't real Jews, real
Jewish people are found existing today descended from the ancient Hebrews.
Arthur lies and said that Jewish people have no right to live in Israel when Jewish
people lived in Israel for over 2,000 years during the time of the ancient Romans,
Byzantinum, the rise of Islam, during the Crusades, and during the Ottoman Empire
even. Jeff Rense is one of the prominent promoters of the lie of the Khazars being
false Jews (including that the Zionists alone rule the world mantra). Rense and
others ignore the role the Vatican/Jesuit network had in the Holocaust and other
events in the Middle East. There are evil Labor Zionists in Israel and their
philosophies existed from the pro-Sabbateans/Frankists crowd (who love the occult.
Jacob Frank had dealings with the Vatican). Many of them are under the authority of
the Vatican like Peres being trained by the Jesuits. Now, people like Daryl Bradford
Smith, Rense, and their ilk refuse to make a distinction between the wicked Labor
Zionist elites and regular Jewish people on the street. Baron Knigge, the guy who
boosted the ranks of the Bavarian Illuminati leaving over his anger that Weishaupt
was a Jesuit agent. The Oslo Accord existed in the early 1990's & "the Vatican
Accord," which Jesuit-trained Vatican asset Shimon Peres snuck in support of. The
Vatican Accord handed over the Temple Mount & much of the holy sites in
Jerusalem to the Vatican. Arthur Koestler & his 1976 book 'the Thirteenth Tribe'
offers the false solution that Jewish people should all migrate to Israel or drop their
Jewish heritage all together. As The Encyclopedia of Judaism (1989) emphatically
states, "The notion that Ashkenazi Jewry is descended from the Khazars has
absolutely no basis in fact." Jews already lived in Europe a thousand years before
the Khazar kingdom was formed. There are no genetic markers or indicators at
all showing that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Turkic tribes. In fact, there
exists considerable genetic evidence showing that European Jews are closer to
Levantine and Syrian Arabs than to Central Asians.
A number of more serious books about Khazars are now on the market, including
“The Jews of Khazaria” by Kevin Alan Brook. Rabbi Bernard Rosensweig was one of
the leading figures in debunking the Khazar theory of Ashkenazi Jewish origins.
Writing in Tradition (16:5, Fall 1977, pages 139-162), he dismissed it as "wobbly
scholarly foundations without historical support." Likewise, the Swedish
archaeologist Bozena Werbart, an expert on the Khazars, wrote: "In the Khazar
kingdom, Koestler wanted to see the origin of the eastern European Jewry.
Nevertheless, all the historical and linguistic facts contradicted his theories."
Univ. Press, 1954) states that: "It only remains now to consider the theory that the
modern Jews of eastern Europe, or more particularly those in Poland, are the
descendants of the medieval Khazars. This can be dealt with very shortly, because
there is LITTLE EVIDENCE which bears directly upon it, and it unavoidably
retains the character of a mere assumption. ... To speak of the Jews of eastern
Europe as descendants of the Khazars...would be to GO MUCH BEYOND WHAT
OUR IMPERFECT RECORDS ALLOW." (pp. 261,263. Emphasis has been added to
quotations. Dunlop is a source book for Koestler. Koestler believes the theory that
east European Jews are descendants of the Khazars.)
Arthur Koestler’s parents were Jewish, but later in 1949-50 Koestler 'renounced' his
religious heritage. Arthur Koestler became a lifelong atheist. As a businessman,
Arthur Koestler was unprejudiced. He financed disastrous inventions like the
envelope opening machine and radioactive soap. He established The Koestler
Foundation, which exists to promote research in parapsychology and other fields.
Arthur Koestler was a raper of many women. Arthur Koestler beat up and raped
several women, including Jill Craigie, the actress and wife of his friend Michael
Foot, according to a new biography. He is also inspired more anti-Semitism just
like Romanist Benjamin Freedman, so the Papal agenda has always been to
bashed Jewish people. He persuaded his healthy wife to commit suicide with him
in 1983 like a coward. Koestler was apart of the Hemlock, so he accepted the sick
tenet of euthanasia. Koestler spent 3 years in the Communist Kibbutz (which is
the same thing as a commune, which the Labor Zionists supported). The Labor
Zionists have finite reach in world geo political, while they are overshadowed in
power to the Vatican (including their Knighthoods, the Jesuits, Knights of Malta,
The Pilgrim Society, etc.). Koestler claimed that this literature on the Khazars
would defuse anti-Semitism, but it had the opposite effect.
Jesus Christ is God's answer to racism. Paul admonishes the Galatians that they are
to make no distinctions among those belonging to Christ; they are to be as one: "For
all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There
is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male
nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal. 3:27-28).
Appendix C: Benajmin H. Freedman
Benjamin H. Freedman is a famous Jewish person being another self hater.
Freedman was born Oct 4, 1890 in New York City. He hated his race so much that he
converted to Roman Catholicism. The Vatican is the same group that butchered his
race for centuries. According to “The Dark Side of the Papacy” being created by
Peter De Rosa (from 1988 whose Publisher is Crown Publishers, Inc.):
“…The [Roman Catholic] Church has a long record of anti-Semitism. Popes in
the Borgia era created a ghetto for the Jews, required them to wear distinctive
yellow hats whenever they ventured out… The Holy Fathers [Ed. Note: i.e., the
popes; the title “Holy Father” belongs only to GOD] could be more vicious
toward those among its own who opposed the power of the [Roman Catholic]
Church. [Pope] Innocent III [pope: 1198-1216] murdered far more Christians in
one afternoon – 12,000 – than any Roman emperor did in his entire reign. Popes
reintroduced torture into the judicial system. And more recently, within the last
century, popes have called religious freedom madness, free elections godless, and a
free press tantamount to atheism.”
Many bigots use his words as accurate representations of the truth. Some of these
bigots try to justify their hatred and try to infiltrate the Patriot Movement by citing
his literature. They feel since he’s Jewish, all Jews are devils. Now, even
Freedman’s words have been proven to be lies on many levels. It’s time to fight for
the truth. One anti-Semitic bigot told me that it’s war since I refuse to accept his
British-Israelism lies. Well, I don’t war with flesh and blood. There is a war, but God
has been the victor. Freedman gave a famous speech to people. Freedman said that
before August 1, 1916, Germany won WWI. The truth is that the war was a
stalemate (like after the Battle of Somme) before the Allied forces won WWI.
Germany was fighting Britian, America, and France combined. Benjamin Freedman
claimed that French (losing 600,000 troops at Somme) and Russians troop mutinied.
That didn’t happened. The French lost abut 150,000 troops in Verdun. Benjamin
Freedman falsely claimed that a German peace offering occurred in WWI. He claims
to be at the Paris Peace Conference with 116 Jewish people. Yet, there hasn’t been
an independent outside source proving that Freedman was there at the
Conference. Benjamin Freedman believed that all of the members of the
American Jewish Delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference were pro-Zionist.
Here’s the truth. The members of the American Jewish Delegation to the Versailles
Peace Conference included many anti-Zionist Jewish people. The anti-Zionists in the
American Jewish Committee, including Adolph Ochs, the publisher of The New York
Times, refused to go along with their own more moderate leaders (they didn’t want a
new homeland in Palestine at all. This has been recorded in the work, entitled, “The
Jews in America” by Arthur Hertzberg). Also, Chaim Weizmann and the Arabic
leader Faisal Hussein (who lead the Arab delegation after WWII) had an agreement
for a homeland of Israel. Freedman ignores this. Faisal was the first King of Iraq.
Faisal’s father was Sharif Hussein. Freedman lied and said that Jewish people
collectively was responsible for the German defeat of WWI (he even claimed that
98% of all Communists were Jews when there is no conclusive evidence for that all).
Freedman claimed that the Jewish boycott of Germany was effective. The truth is
that the Untermeyer boycott was so incredibly ineffective that Germany had
experienced complete economic recovery by 1937. Freedman believes in the hoax of
an anti-Semitic quote attributed to Ben Franklin that was actually created by William
Dudley Pelley in 1933. Freedman lies and said that there is no Judea in ancient times.
The Jewish ethnonym in Hebrew is יהודים Yehudim (plural of יהודי Yehudi) which is the
origin of the English word Jew. The Hebrew name is derived from the region name
Judah (Yehudah יהודה .(Originally the name referred to the territory alloted to the tribe
descended from Judah the fourth son of the patriarch Jacob (Numbers). In the Book of
Esther we find the earliest reference of the word "Jew" being used. The name appears in
the Bible in a verb form, in Esther 8:17 which states, Many of the people of the land
"mityahadim - became Yehudim/Judeans/Jews" because the fear of the Yehudim fell on
them. Also in Esther we find that the name "Jew" is given to a man from the tribe of
Benjamin, in Esther 2:5-6. The most common view is that the Middle English word Jew
is from the Old French giu, earlier juieu, from the Latin Iudaeus from the Greek word of
ἸουδαἸος. The Latin simply means Judaean, from the land of Judaea. In the Old English
the word is attested as early as 1000 in various forms, such as Iudeas, Gyu, Giu, Iuu, Iuw,
Iew. These are facts regardless of what the Papal agent Benjamin Freedman says. Like
others, Freedman believes that Khazars are the false Jews living in Israel when the
Ashkenazim lived in the Rhine Valley region in the 300’s A.D. Benjamin Freedman is
right that we should send not billions of dollars in the Middle East (especially now
when we have a grave recession), but that doesn’t justify his hatred of Jewish people
at all. He claimed that Taft was President during the 1905 Russian Revolution when
Theodore Roosevelt was President not Taft. He called Hohenzollern Jewish when
that was the surname of the royal family of Germany. They were not Jews. It’s true
that many secular Jewish people are involved in the new world order conspiracy
(and play a role in both world wars). Yet, even they are having their strings pulled
by more powerful people of the Vatican, the Pilgrim Society, high level
Freemasonry, and the influential bloodlines (that have existed for thousands of years
stirring Empires). Benjamin Freedman falsely said that Christians (from America)
will sent into Palestine to fight against Muslim Arabic people and Christians, which
isn’t occurring now at all. Freedman claimed that the Kol Nidre was about forsaking
all oaths, vows, or pledges among Jewish people for the next 12 months (as said in a
synagogue). The reality is that Kol Nidrey nullifies only vows made to God. This is one of
the oldest libels against Judaism and has been disproven repeatedly.
One of the smoking guns proving that Freedman is a shill is that he associated with
Nelson Bunker Hunt. Nelson Bunker Hunt is not only a member of the Council on
National Policy, but he’s apart of the Jesuit-infiltrated John Birch Society. Hunt is
also a member of the Military and Hospitaller Order of Saint Lazarus of
Jerusalem. The Order of Saint Lazarus has been linked to Lady Malcolm Douglas
Hamilton. Lord Hamilton was the host to Rudolph Hess, Hitler's second in
command, when - in 1940 - Hess made his secret flight to England. Hess was seeking
to meet with the British aristocratic circle known as the "Cliveden Set. Hunt is well
connected to scandals and the establishment. It is true that Labor Zionists and
certain people related to Israel have done a lot of evil in the world. That must be
exposed. Yet, that shouldn’t be the only thing exposed.
Michael Delaney (or Prothink) is another Pro-Papal Jewish hater as well in
Freedman’s ilk. Delaney refuses to expose how many Israeli/Arabic elites are
members of the Papal Constantinian Order and the Order of Francis I. Here’s
more of the Vatican/Jesuit link to the new world order that Delaney refuse to
expose for obvious reasons:
-Pope Leo XIII’s Cardinal Secretary of State, who is Mariano Rampolla del Tindaro
(1843-1913) is a member of the Masonic Ordo Templi Orientis.
-The billionaire Knight of Papal Royal Order of Francis I Nadhmi Auchi once
was a friend of Saddam Hussein. Auchi is now an ally of pro-CFR President
Barack Obama. Auchi is a very rich man and is apart of the Knight of St.
Sylvester. Nasser David Khalili, and others were members of the Papal Knights
of St. Sylvester. SYRIAN PRESIDENT AL-BASSHAD , Prince Khalid al-Faisal, and
Prince Bandar bin Khalid are members of the Knight of the Order of Francis I.
The PLO even has a Vatican Office now. Its head is Mahmoud Abbas.
-King Abdullah II of Jordan was trained by the Jesuits in the Edmund A. Walsh School
of Foreign Service at Jesuit Georgetown University. He holds the rank of Field
Marshal in the Jordan Arab Army and Marshal of the Royal Jordanian Air Force. As of
June 18, 2007, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is a part of the Catholic Order of the
Golden Fleece.
-The Anglican Church’s Archbishop of Canterbury is a Knight of the Duke of Castro’s
Papal Order of Francis I. It’s no surprise that the Anglican Church has allied with
Freemasonry and the Papacy for numerous years.
-Troy made the further connection between the SMOM/Constantinians along with
high level British Freemasonry. For example, the Duke of Kent's son (The Duke of
Kent is Prince Edward or the head of the UGLE or the United Grand Lodge of
England) named Lord Nicholas Windsor married with a Roman Catholic. The
Constantinian Order is made up of the royal/aristocratic elites of Roman Catholic
Europe. This is crucial nexus that is taboo and many in the alternative media aren't
talking about. The Queen of England, Queen Elizabeth, meets with the Popes and
wears a Maltese cross. She is working with the Knights of St. John as well. She is of
the Windsors or the pro-Roman Catholic Saxe-Coburg Gotha family tree. The Duke
of Kent is the cousin to the Queen and the Duke of Gloucester. The Duke of Kent (or
Michael)’s brother is Prince Michael and he’s the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of
Mark Master Masons.
-Now, the Knights of Malta own plus control huge wealth of much of the
military, pharmaceuticals, other prominent corporations, some of our
educational systems (like a Knight of Malta is the President of Georgetown
University), and the politics of the globe. They are cotrolled by their
Grandmaster Matthew Festing today. He is subsequently controlled by the
Vatican and the Jesuits whose leaders are Pope Benedict XVI and Jesuit
General Adolfo Nicholas. Now, it's been discovered that people like Antonio Brown
(who was pictured with the Knight of the Virgin Bonesman George W. Bush, Laura
Bush, Mike Tyson, and Donald Trump), Alexandr Cach, Mike Faraone, and Joey
Demaio are all Knight of Malta in the 21st century. Brother Nicholas Rivera found
some more information on Cach. He found out that Cach owns his Graddo
company. Cach was apart of the INEOA and allied with the DEA (which
promotes the never ending, anti-liberty federal Drug War. These Knights are
also in league with the Knights and Jesuit trained agents found in the Justice
Department, the DHS, and the CIA). Cach has been in the establishment and he
was awarded by Citigroup/Citibank as found by Nicholas Rivera
-George H. W. Bush has been awarded the Order of Merit from the Sovereign Military
Order of Malta. Knight of Malta Edward L. Hennessy Jr. is a leading international
banker in the world. He was a CEO of Applied Signal, Inc. and he is a financial
consultant to the Vatican. Edward was once a 14 year Chairman of an trustee of his
alma mater the Farleigh Dickinson University. He is a Knight of St. Gregory (like
Rupert Murdoch of FOX News), and A Knight of the Equestrian Order of the Holy
Sepulchre. Hennessy was also director of Lockheed Martin, Traveler’s Insurance
Company, Automatic Data Processing, New York Stock Exchange, Union Texas
Petroleum Corporation, the United Way of Tri-State, the Coast Guard Academy
Foundation, Inc., DNA Plant Technology Corporation, the National Association of
Manufacturers, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the United States Export and
Import Bank. The Knights of Malta are subordinate under the Papacy and the Jesuits.
-Edward Cardinal Egan is the “spiritual head” of the Knights of Malta in America.
Egan is a French-Neapolitan Constantinian Knight and a Knight of the Suke of Savoy
led Order of Sts Maurice & Lazarus according to Troy. P2 Mason Victor Emmanuel is
the Duke of Savoy. Knight of Malta Geoffrey T. Boisi is another banker. He is a trustee
of the Brookings Institution and a Member of the Board of Freddie Mac (2004-). Boisi
is a Trilateralist and works with many corporate interests for decades.
*Anti-Semitism is shown by these shills (like Daryl Bradford Smith, Fr. John
Martinez, Ongir, etc.), because it’s in the interests of the Vatican and the Jesuits (in
order to take blame off of them plus to further create the new world order). That is
why real patriots are slandered as Nazis and anti-Semites by the actions of a small
few of extremists. This anti-Semitic fury is shown in attempting to discredit the
Word of God since every author of it was Jewish (except the apostle Luke). The King
James Bible especially is hated by not only skeptics, but Jesuit agents (who created
their distorted Jesuit-inspired Douay-Rheims Bible version). Darryl Eberhart, Troy,
those from Unhived Mind, Eric Jon Phelps, Jack Chick, CT Wilcox, and others are
some of the few researchers exposing this Vatican connection to the new world
order. Eberhart warns against some people that promote Jewish bashing from Jeff
Rense, AFP, Ted Pike, numerous individuals in the RBN network, and others. The
former AFP editor, Christopher Pethrick, was educated at Canisius a Jesuit College
and is an active financial donor. The essence of Romanist heresy, Kabbalah heresy,
and many New Age heresies are Babylonian of origin. The Mysteries from ancient
Babylon & ancient Egypt are still with us today.
Appendix D: Myron Fagan
Fagan deceived even non-racist new world order researchers. I was once deceived
in checking out his information. Now, I now his information has deception and
it’s utilize to attempt to discredit real Patriots in exposing the new world order.
Fagan (ironically was a Jewish American) gave his speech in the 1960’s about many
issues. Between 1967 and 1968 Fagan recorded 'The Illuminati and the Council on
Foreign Relations' which talks about the CFR and the Illuminati. Fagan believes that
Communists have infiltrated Hollywood. He said that United Nations is at the crux
in a conspiracy to destroy national sovereignty. While, it is true that the U.N. have
made bad policies for decades. The United Nations are indeed anti-American
national sovereignty via their policies. Yet, the new world order agenda is bigger
than just the United Nations. Fagan believes that Adam Weishaupt was Jewish who
created the Illuminati. The reality is that Adam Weishaupt was not Jewish. He was a
professor of canon law in Ingolstadt University. He formed the Illuminati with
others in 1776 in Bavaria. Weishaupt created the Illuminati by himself not at the
behest of the House of Rothschild (when there was no major House of Rothschild
back then). Adam Weishaupt became a Freemason in 1777. Also, Gentile Adolf
Freiherr Knigge worked with him. Fagan claimed that the Dillions, Clarence and
Douglas Dillon’s original name was Laposky. That is untrue. Myron Fagan
believes that the Rothschilds funded both sides of the Napoeleon War. From 1813 to
1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild in London was instrumental in the financing of the
British war effort, handling the shipment of bullion to the Duke of Wellington's
army in Portugal and Spain, as well as arranging the payment of British financial
subsidies to their Continental allies. In the 19th century a legend began which
accuses him of having used his early knowledge of victory at the Battle of Waterloo
to speculate on the Stock Exchange and make a vast fortune. Other sources shown
that this legend originated in an anti-semitic French pamphlet in 1846, was
embellished by John Reeves in 1887 in The Rothschilds: the Financial Rulers of
Then, it was repeated in other later popular accounts, such as that of Morton.
Many of the alleged facts stated are incorrect. For example, it has been shown that
the size of the market in government bonds at the time would not have enabled a
scenario producing a profit of anything near


America's 'Young America' lIlovelIlent: I slaveholders and the B'nai B'rith

Chorus: Ten years from now, in 1860, Lord Palmerston's
quest for world empire will enter its most critical phase: the
American Civil War, provoked by Young America and other
pro-British networks. A French army will be in Mexico,
propping up Maximilian. Britain will ready the fleet and send
troops to Canada. The only support for Lincoln's beleaguered Union will come from the Russian Empire of Czar
Alexander 11, with two Russianfleets being sent to American
ports in 1863 with orders from the czar to join Lincoln in
fighting Britain and France should general war break out.
Mazzini, Urquhart, and their assets will pull out all the stops
to isolate Russia and blow up eastern Europe.
In the midst of these preparations, we have the emergence
of Young Israel-B'nai B'rith-as an ideal British weapon
against both the United States and Russia, and also against
other nations. Lord Palmerston's interest in Zionism was
stimulated during the Middle East crisis of 1840, when
France backed a rebellious satrap of the Ottoman sultan.
The British found that while the French were the official
protectors of the Roman Catholics in the Turkish Empire,
and the Russians the patrons of the Orthodox, the British had
no group of Anglicans or Puritans to sponsor. The British
turned their attention to Armenians and Jews. Palmerston
ordered British diplomats to take Jewish communities under
their protection, since Britain was "the natural guardian of
the Jews." This gave the British a foot in the door in the
Middle East, and also in Russia, including Russian Poland,
where 50% of world Jewry then resided. At this time, Palmerston's son-in-law, the Earl ofShaftesbury, wrote that "it may
be safely asserted that [the Jews] contemplate a restoration
to the soil of Palestine." Shaftesbury was talking through his
hat: He admitted that many Jews "will prefer a seat in the
House of Commons in England to a seat under their vines
and fig trees in Palestine." But the British resolve to settle
Jews in Palestine was clear.
The founder of Zionism in its modern, British-sponsored
form is not Theodor Herzl, but a certain Moses Hess. Hess
converted Friedrich Engels to communism, and wrote parts
of Marx's Gennan Ideology. In 1861, Hess will write Rome
and Jerusalem, which attacks Moses Mendelssohn for the
idea that Judaism is a religion and a culture. For Hess,
Judaism is a race in Mazzini's blood-and-soil sense, and
therefore must have a homeland. Yet another of Palmers ton ,
theme parks will open its doors.
In the B'nai B'rith's official, ,authorized history, it says:
"B' nai B' rith' s relationship to the Civil War presents something of a mystery." They say. that the arrest of the B 'nai
B'rith's leader in Washington jis a Confederate spymaster
was unfair. They say that no ooe can account for why the
group was not pro-Union, whereas most Jews were proUnion, and B'nai B'rith's lodg¢s were almost all located in
the North. Indeed, Jewish soldiers in the Union Anny were
intensely proud, mostly Gennan-speaking immigrant, antislavery Republicans.
To solve the mystery, we go back 20 years before the
start of the American Civil War.
British Foreign Minister Palmerston launched Zionism
in 1840. He wrote that the Jews desired to return to Palestine
(Abba Eban points out that the Jews knew nothing about
this); and a month later, the British landed troops in Palestine
for the first time.
B'nai B'rith was started officially in 1843 by some obscure Freemasons in New York, as a secret society "like
Freemasonry " for Jews. B'nai B'rith was to shape and lead a
particular political faction, with a particular agenda, within
the Jewish community.
The agenda for this project came out in a famous speech
given two years later at South Carolina College. The speaker
was Edwin DeLeon, from a Jewish family in South Carolina
that was already notorious for its involvement in the slave
trade and in Scottish Rite Freemasonry. DeLeon was later a
leader of the Confederate Secret Service.
DeLeon praised his teacher at the school, Thomas Cooper,
an English atheist and Lord Shelburne's adventurer, who had
first proposed that the South secede from the Union. DeLeon
hailed Cooper as a tender-hearted religious heretic and "an
earnest ... disciple of the school of Bentham and Malthus."
DeLeon said, "There is a 'Young Gennany,' a 'Young
France,' and a 'Young England'-and why not a 'Young
America'?" He told the students: Any great civil convulsion
comes from a source that is unexpected and obscure. In the
French Revolution, the priests and nobles were only the flax
with which the flame was kindled. But those who first applied
Leaders of the British masonic plot to break up the United States (left to right): Isaac Mayer Wise, Midwest leader of the B'nai B' rith;
Killian Henry Van Rensselaer, promulgator of the racist Knights of the Golden Circle; and Judah Benjamin, head of the Confederate
Secret Service.
the spark were the filthy, obscure savants of the Englightenment. DeLeon reminded the students that the actors in that
drama were only its creatures, not its creators.
He then proposed revolutionary military action as the
idea for his Young America, to spread what he called "freedom"-by force.
The "Young America" idea first bore its bitter fruit when
U.S. President James Polk ordered American troops to invade Mexico. Young Congressman Abraham Lincoln exposed the President as a fraud; he denounced the Mexican war
as a slaveowners' conspiracy that would wreck our country.
Lincoln was driven out of politics until 12 years later.
This British project matured in the mid-1850s, and its
active focus shifted to the West. There were two important
partners out there: Isaac M. Wise, a B'nai B'rith Midwest
leader based in Cincinnati; and Killian H. Van Rensselaer, a
British military operative and Scottish Rite Mason northern
leader, also based in Cincinnati. Between 1854 and 1860,
they spread a pro-slavery, secessionist-terrorist group along
the route extending down the Mississippi valley to Louisiana
and Texas: the Knights of the Golden Circle. Wise's B'nai
B'rith organization spread southward along the identical
route. Their plan was to spread slavery into Latin America
and the U.S. West, and break up the U.S.A. into several
small countries.
In Louisiana, U.S. Sen. Judah Benjamin and Scottish
Rite Southern Mason leader Albert Pike worked together on
this terrorist secession project. There is a bust of Albert Pike
in New Orleans, celebrating his work in that pre-war southern
base for the Scottish Rite, the Knights, and B 'nai B'rith.
Judah Benjamin's relative (his uncle's brother Manny) had
earlier written the masonic order creating the Northern Scottish Rite organization, in which Wise and Van Rensselaer
were now leaders.
A trail of treason
To start the Civil War, this pre-organized anti-Union
terrorist force would strike for secession in the South. Those
who stayed in the North during the War would be known as
"Copperheads," with headquarters in Ohio.
Before the war, Isaac Wise had two B'nai B'rith local
leaders in Cleveland: Simon Wolf and Benjamin F. Peixotto.
Wolf and Peixotto also worked as political agents for Democratic Party boss August Belmont, the U. S. representative of
the Rothschild banks-chief moneybags of the British
crown, and British puppets. Banker Belmont paid for the
Knights of the Golden Circle and Young America projects,
which he helped plan while he was U.S. ambassador to the
Benjamin Peixotto was editor of the Cleveland Plain
Dealer, a violently pro-Copperhead paper which furious citizens forced to shut down during the war. Wolf and Peixotto
ran a Hebrew amateur acting group, which included their
non-Hebrew friend John Wilkes Booth.
The war started in 1861. Simon Wolf went to Washington
as the B 'nai B'rith representative in the national capital,
joining Albert Pike's Southern Scottish Rite and Judah Benjamin's Confederate Secret Service operations. Wolf was
almost immediately arrested by U.S. Army Counterintelligence director Lafayette Baker, who worked directly for
President Abraham Lincoln and for Lincoln's Secretary of
War Edwin M. Stanton. The B'nai B'rith was understood to
be a Confederate intelligence front. B 'nai B 'rith 's official
history says that the "cruel" and "ruthless" Colonel Baker
had Simon Wolf arrested "solely because he was a member
of B'nai B'rith." At the time, they say, Wolf was "defending
several Southern Jews arrested in Washington and charged
with being Confederate spies."
Meanwhile in Cincinnati, Isaac Wise's cohort Julius
Ochs got in trouble when his wife, Bertha, was arrested for
smuggling drugs to the Confederate Army in her son's baby
carriage. Later, Julius and Bertha's son, the white supremacist Adolph Ochs, married Isaac Wise's daughter, and then
bought the New York Times. Their daughter married Arthur
The U.S. Navy won an 1862 Mississippi River battle,
and the U.S. Army took Memphis, Tennessee. Isaac Wise's
Memphis B'nai B'rith agent, the British-born Abraham E.
Frankland, was arrested, and admitted being a Confederate
spymaster. Julius Ochs sent him supplies in jail the same
day, and Frankland was released on a $20,000 bond. We'll
hear more of this degenerate Frankland shortly.
The next year, B'nai B'rith leader Isaac Wise was nominated at an Ohio Convention to run for state senator on the
radical anti-Union Copperhead election ticket. Wise's running mate for Ohio governor was Clement Vallandigham,
then in exile in Canada, whom President Lincoln had banished from the country as America's leading traitor.
The B'nai B'rith leader's candidacy caused a crisis and a
newspaper scandal. The Cincinnati Jewish community was
overwhelmingly pro-Union. His own synagogue issued a
formal demand for him to withdraw; Wise was forced off the
The conspiracy to kill Lincoln
At the close of the war, on April 14, 1865, John Wilkes
Booth shot President Abraham Lincoln while another man
simultaneously attacked Secretary of State William Seward.
Lincoln died the next day.
Here are some basic facts of the murder. Some months
before he shot Lincoln, John Wilkes Booth deposited funds
in the Montreal, Canada bank regularly used by the operatives of Confederate Secret Service head Judah Benjamin.
John Surrat, a regular Judah Benjamin agent, confessed to
plotting with Booth to abduct Lincoln, and admitted to using
that Montreal bank for Benjamin's funds.
In the museum which they keep at the assassination site
at Ford's Theatre, the National Parks Service displays a decoding sheet, found by police in John Wilkes Booth's trunk.
Displayed alongside it is a matching coding device which
was found in the office of Judah Benjamin.
At the time John Wilkes Booth shot Lincoln, Booth's old
acquaintance Benjamin Peixotto was international president
of the B 'nai B 'rith. Only hours before going to Ford's Theatre
to shoot the President, Booth met with his old friend B'nai
B'rith Washington chief Simon Wolf, for a confidential discussion over some drinks. Simon Wolf later claimed that at
this meeting, Booth told him about a woman who had turned
down Booth's marriage proposal. That evening, Booth murdered Abraham Lincoln, and Wolf attributed the killing to
Booth's anguish over his broken heart. (So, the "lone assassin" story of John Hinckley and Jody Foster is an old story.)
Simon Wolf was later a prime founder of the Anti-Defamation League.
Albert Pike's Ku Klux Klan
After the war, the Ku Klux Klan was started up in Tennessee to stop newly freed blacks from voting. With their occultsatanic rituals and costumes, the KKK burned and tortured
blacks and pro-U.S.A. whites. The Klan's national headquarters was in Memphis, where KKK leaders Albert Pike
and Nathan B. Forrest lived and attended lodge together.
Memphis B'nai B'rith leader Abraham Frankland was an
intimate friend of Albert Pike. Frankland had been in the
Pike-Benjamin spy apparatus, and wrote a blistering attack
on the U. S. attempt to reconstruct the South under equal
rights. Frankland now stayed on to aid Pike in his postwar
A notebook of Frankland's Kabbalistic Researches is
kept in the American Jewish Archives, Cincinnati. It is a
compendium of espionage ciphers, black magic symbols,
masonic ritual, and pagan religion. In his preface, Frankland
acknowledges aid to his religious research by Albert Gallatin
Mackey, grand secretary of the Scottish Rite, "and the Book
Lohar on the Sephiroth, kindly loaned to me by Gen'l Albert
KKK boss Pike was simultaneously working on his own
satanic masterpiece, Morals and Dogma, published in 1871.
On page 38 of Kabbalistic Researches, Frankland lists
assorted gods passed down by tradition from ancient times,
including "Four of the thirteen great Gods of Assyria," plus
the god "Bel." Mackey writes that Frankland's god Bel is a
form of Baal, and was worshipped by the Babylonians as
their chief deity. This is, of course, the false god which
the Old Testament Jewish prophets fought to expunge from
Israel. Mackey says that since 1871 the Royal Arch Masonic
system has combined Bel with "Jah" for Jehova and "On" for
the Egyptian sun god, into "JahBeIOn," as an "explanation"
of God. The Hebrew menorah blasphemously used in the
Royal Arch Masonic ritual is displayed in the Alexandria,
Virginia masonic temple.
Other pages of Frankland's notebook contain "Cypher"
and "Private Cypher," "Philosophical and Hermetic Alphabet," "Cypher of the Rose Cross," and "Ten Cabalistic
In his Morals and Dogma, KKK boss Albert Pike celebrates the collaboration between these two Memphis masonic
chiefs, Pike and Frankland, at the height of the bloodiest
assassination wave in U. S. history. Pike says, "One is filled
with admiration, on penetrating into the Sanctuary of the
Kabalah, at seeing a doctrine so logical, so simple, and at
the same time so absolute . . . a philosophy summed up by
counting on one's fingers . . .. Ten ciphers and twenty-two
letters, a triangle, a square, and a circle-these are all the
elements of the Kabalah. "
So, upon the triumph of their KKK, Albert Pike appointed Abraham Frankland the head of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry for the state of Tennessee, and an emeritus member
of the Supreme Council. Simultaneously, Isaac Wise appointed Abraham Frankland the president of the B'nai B'rith
district for Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, and Arkansas.
At the beginning of this century, Isaac Wise's grandson
Adolph Ochs, the owner of the New York Times, wrote a
series of editorials attacking black voting rights in those
southern states. This vicious editorial campaign helped swing
the North behind the new anti-black Jim Crow laws which
were then being written, which finally reversed rights gained
by Union blood during the civil war. The Ochs-Sulzberger
family, a great power in the B'nai B'rith, has remained in
control of the New York Times ever since.
Chorus: Sometimes persons who have been used by British intelligence manage to assert their own humanity and
rebel. Take the example of Simon Bolivar, the liberator of
several countries in [bero-America. After a lifetime of cooperation with Bentham and his agents, Bolivar realized his
mistake and repudiated his former associate. This took the
form, first of all, of an J 828 decree banning in Colombia all
secret societies and fraternities, described as groups "disrupting public tranquility and the established order."
At about the same time, Bolivar issued another proclamation outlawing the teaching of Bentham in the university.
Bolivar attacked Bentham and his school as "opposed to
religion, to morality, and to the tranquility of the people,"
and as a contributing cause in censpiracies and disorders in
Bogota. Bolivar concluded that youth was being "given a
deadly poison through those authors, which destroyed their
religion and morals."
To replace Bentham, Bolivar mandated study of Latin,
morals and natural law, constitutional law, and the foundations of the Roman Catholic faith.


League Of Just Men
The League of the Just or the League of Just Men (Bund der Gerechten), a secret revolutionary organisation founded in 1836 by German proletarianised emigrant craftsmen in Paris. Besides France, League branches existed in Germany, England and Switzerland. A great role in their organisation was played by Weitling. This was initially a utopian socialist and Christian communist grouping devoted to the ideas of Gracchus Babeuf. Various theories of utopian communism and socialism, in particular Weitlingism, formed the ideological foundation of the League. The motto of the League of the Just was "All Men are Brothers" and its goals were "the establishment of the Kingdom of God on Earth, based on the ideals of love of one's neighbor, equality and justice".

The League of the Just was a splinter group from the League of Outlaws (Bund der Geaechteten) created in Paris in 1834 by Theodore Schuster, Wilhelm Weitling and others German emigres. Schuster was inspired by the works of Philippe Buonarroti. The League of Outlaws had a pyramidal structure inspired by the secret society of the Republican Carbonari, and shared ideas with Saint-Simon and Charles Fourier's utopic socialism. Their aim was to establish a "Social Republic" in the German states which would respect "freedom", "equality" and "civic virtue".

In 1836 the most extreme, chiefly proletarian elements of the secret democratic-republican Outlaws' League, which was founded by German refugees in Paris in 1834, split off and formed the new secret League of the Just. The parent League, in which only sleepy-headed elements à la Jakobus Venedey were left, soon fell asleep altogether; when in 1840 the police scented out a few sections in Germany, it was hardly even a shadow of its former self.



Knights of KKK

The political evolution of the Knights of the Ku Klux
Klan was a direct outcome of policies initiated during
the first half of the 19th century by the British
aristocracy and their "court Jews, the Rothschilds.
The combined capabilities of the key secret societies
controlled by these circles - the Scottish Rite of
Freemasonry, the B'nai B'rith (Order of the Sons of
the Covenant), and the Jesuits (Society of Jesus) -
allowed the British and allied Black Guelph circles to
nearly destroy the foundations of the United States
republic through assassinations (including that of
Abraham Lincoln), terrorist operations, and general
subversive activity culminating in the War Between
The States.
The starting point for unraveling this vast
conspiratorial apparatus is the Knights of the Golden
The Knights of the Golden Circle combined the
network of individuals associated directly with the
Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, B'nai B'rith, and the
Jesuits. Practically the entire Confederate leadership
belonged to the KGC at the point of the secessionist
crisis in 1860. It is through tracing the lineage of the
KGC that the Ku Klux Klan becomes an
understandable phenomenon.
However, to make fully comprehensible the
significance of the combined relationship of these
secret societies, a short historical backdrop is first
Prior to and during the American Revolutionary
War, and significantly afterwards, the British
initiated an intensive subversion effort aimed at taking over and destroying the Franklin-organized
Freemason networks that functioned as the
organizing body for the revolution. The explicit
counteroperation was the Scottish Rite of
Freemasonry, under the control of the British-Black
Guelph-Knights of Malta organization. It was because
of this effort that many of the individuals who served
the British in the KGC were also members of the
Scottish Rite.
It is equally significant that the abolitionist societies
of New England, as well as the entire secessionist
states' rights movement, were all financed and
basically controlled through the Rothschild-Baring
bankers of the British monarchy.
This political intelligence profile will concentrate on
the closely connected evolution of three secret
organizations: the Knights of the Golden Circle, the
B'nai B'rith, and the Ku Klux Klan.
1. The Knights of the Golden Circle
"I hear a good deal about the association called the
Knights of the Golden Circle, a Protestant association
for securing the Gulf provinces and states. including
which has been largely developed by recent times . . .
in the Southern confederacy. and creating them into
an independent government."
The above is taken from William Howard Russell's
book My Diary North and South, written in 1866 by the
London Times war correspondent. Russell had gotten
this assignment at a meeting on May 5, 1861 with
Confederate leader General Pierre Beauregard, a
leader of the KGC. Russell himself was serving his
Queen as a top British Secret Intelligence Service
agent. profiling the 1861 crisis situation in the United
States and reporting back to the Rothschild owner of
the London Times. (1)
Originating out of the 1828-32 Nullification Crisis, the
KGC was not officially established until 1854 under the
direction of Dr. George William Lamb Bickley.
Bickley had been trained in Botany at the University
of London in the 1840s, then redeployed back into the
U. S.
Prior to the official surfacing of the KGC. however,
the Southern Rights Clubs were established during the
height of Andrew Jackson's presidency. Their
structure was identical with that of the southern
branch of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry with its
prime political focus centered on a three-point
program. As stated in the KGC's manual, the three
points were:
(1) Reestablish the sla ve trade;
(2) Acquire new slave territory;
(3) Destroy the U. S. Constitution as a "tyrannical
document. "
Two of the leaders of the SRC were Robert Toombs
and William Landes Yancey. Each was to play a
significant role in the Confederate government.
Toombs. a so-called Southern Whig, was personally
1. Documentation of the KGC's activity is quite extensive.
Most of the information in this report comes from primary
sources of the period. Particularly useful were:
Pumfrey. Jim. An authentic exposition of the Knights of
the Golden Cire/e. or a History of the Secession. by a former
member (Indianapolis. 1861).
Pittman, Ben. ed .. The Indianapolis Treason Trial of 1865
(court transcript on the conspiracy by the Sons of Liberty. a
later form of the KGC in Illinois. Indiana. and Ohio).
Holt. Joseph. An Official Report: A Western Conspiracy in
Aid of the Southern Rebe//ion. by Judge Advocate Joseph
responsible for financing several attempts to kidnap
Africans and bring them to the South. Significantly.
the SRCs served British intelligence by providing a
functioning political infrastructure for the
secessionist movement and for the creation of other
secret societies.
Two of the main centers of the SRC. and later the
Knights of the Golden Circle. were New Orleans and
Charleston. S. C. Secret orders such as the Order of the
Lone Star were also set uP. then later merged directly
into the KGC. Key in organizing the New Orleans
operations was Judah P. Benjamin. later to be the
Secretary of State of the Confederacy. of whom more
In 1854. Bickley surfaced with the organization
known as the Knights of the Golden Circle. Under the
banner of creating a "Democratic Monarchy in North
America. " its first operation was to organize
paramilitary terrorism in Central America. Mexico.
and Cuba. the purpose of which was to instigate a war
between the U. S. and Spain. One of its most successful
early ventures was under the direction of William
Walker. who organized a military coup in Nicaragua
in 1855.
The next phase of the KGC's activity was to organize
a military coup in the U. S. before Lincoln could be
inaugurated. The KGC was used primarily as the
main terror force to ensure that the key Southern
states voted for secession. Its stated organizational
purpose indicates the extent of its intentions at the
time of the 1860 election of Lincoln:
(1) Secure all U. S. arsenals;
(2) Sabotage reconciliation between North and
(3) Concentrate on the border states:
(a) coerce state legislatures or governors into
voting for secession;
(b) elect legislators to vote for secession;
(c) bring armed men from the cotton states:
(4) Set up Knights of the Safety Guards. watch over
men who are doubtful about secession;
(5) Organize guerrilla bands to harass union troops.
under the direction of the Knights Gallant. the elite
corps within the Knights;
(6) Northern members were instructed to play
"hypocrite roles " by loudly supporting Union efforts
in order to act as spies;
(7) Raise militias in the North. turn arms over to the
South. and send Confederate ladies to spy in the
(8) Assassination and terror.
"In short. the intention of the secessionist is to have
a more powerful monarchy than England." according
to KGC member Jim Pumfrey. (2)
The belief structure of the KGC was the following.
Its symbols were the glowing sun and 15 stars
emblazened on a crescent. with a triangle with the
numbers 3.7 and 5 placed in each anglE' with R-61 in the
middle of the triangle. The R meant 'revolution, ' and
the 61 meant 1861. in other words. Revolution in 1861.
Meetings took place in "castles" or lodges. which
were organized on the local. state. and national level.
On the state level they were referred to as "Grand
State Castles," with a delegate body .sent to the
"Grand United States Castle" or " American Legion."
In its organizational hierarchy. as reported by the
Daily Louisville Democrat in 1861. the KGC was
divided into three degrees or levels. The first degree
was the Foreign and Home Guards. the second degree
was Commercial and Financial. and the third or
highest degree was the political governing body. the
American Legion. Each degree was divided into
divisions which were in turn divided into departments.
The 10 departments comprising a division were
Agriculture. Education. Manufacturing. Finance.
Religion. Police. War. Navigation. Law. and a Foreign
Thus. when the Confederate government was
established. the KGC was its ready-made leadership
body. With 65.000 KGC members in the South. and
several members of President Buchanan's cabinet
also members of the KGC. the plot to pull off a
military coup nearly succeeded.
Central in the plot was the assassination of
President-elect Abraham Lincoln. In February 1861 a
plot to kill Lincoln was in place in Baltimore. Md.
There. under a subunit known as the Palmetto
Guards. the KGC planned the murder of Lincoln. It
was only due to the efforts of General Winfield Scott.
that the plan did not succeed - until four years later.
During the Civil War the KGC was used to run
subversion through the Democratic Party faction
known as the Copperheads. or antiwar Democrats.
With a plan for provoked outbreaks of violence and
terror combined with Confederate military
operations. in Missouri. Illinois. Indiana. Ohio.
Kentucky. Tennesee. and the cities of Chicago and
New York. the Confederacy aimed to destroy the
North's ability to fight. Draft riots aided by Jesuit
priests. with the cooperation of the Mayors of New
York and Chicago. Fernando Wood and Edward
Walsh. as key conspirators. were designed to stop the
war by forcing a negotiated settlement.
All espionage and terror operations deployed into the
North were under the direction of the Confederate
Secretary of State. Judah P. Benjamin. Benjamin. a
former U.S. Senator from Louisiana. was born in the
British West Indies in 1811 and remained a British
subject throughout his career in the U.S. Under the
Confederacy Benjamin became first Attorney
General. then Secretary of War. and last and most
important, Secretary of State.
The plot to destroy the Union remained the foremost
theme of Benjamin's activity. Central to the
insurrections to be run in the North and in the border
states was the Confederate espionage operation
functioning in Canada, with its headquarters in
Montreal. Not coincidentally. the hotel in Montreal.
St. Lawrence Hall. that headquartered the
Confederate Secret Service also was the headquarters
of the British military mission.
The head of Confederate espionage was Jacob
Thompson. a former Secretary of the Interior under
Buchanan and a member of the KGC. Through
Thompson and another top British operative operating
in Canada named George Sanders. the plan to
assassinate Lincoln was finalized.
The assassination was carried out by John Wilkes
Booth. a member of the KGC, along with John
Harrison Surratt who had been trained by Jesuits at
Jesuit Georgetown College (now known as
Georgetown University) . The two were under the
immediate direction of Benjamin and Thompson.
Most of the intelligence garnered and reported by
Union counterespionage operations was suppressed at
the Lincoln assassination trial by Secretary of War
Edwin Stanton. Stanton had known Benjamin quite
intimately since 1850, when both were deployed by the
U. S. government as members of the California Land
Commission: Stanton headed up the commission and
had Benjamin as his able assistant.
It is now known that not only did John Harrison
Surrat escape capture through the efforts of two Jesuit
priests and wound up in the Papal Zouaves, but that
Booth also escaped. The coverup "killing " of Booth at
Garrett's farm was carried out by Union officers who
were highest-degree members of the Scottish Rite of
Freemasonry. Even the head of the National
Detective Bureau, Lafayette C. Baker, who was later
poisoned to death, revealed in documents only
recently published that he knew that the individual
found in the burned-out barn was not Booth.
The KGC underwent several face lifts to prevent
detection, and rechristened itself. The Order of the
American Knights and The Sons of Liberty were two
new names it took before it became the Ku Klux Klan.
2. 8'nai 8'rith, or the Independent Order
of the Sons of the Covenant
Israel Joseph Benjamin, a European Sephardic Jew.
toured the U. S. in 1859-62. Benjamin (no relation to
Judah Benjamin, although the two met) was part of a
network of humanists associated with Alexander von
Hum boldt deployed to profile Jewish organizations in
the U. S. In a book titled Three Yeas in America he
described the B'nai B'rith as follows:
"This is a secret society, like the Freemasons, with
passwords, signs, and the like ... still I think that
existence of such an organization is not at all
necessary . , . "
The B'nai B'rith was officially founded in October
1843, as part of the Rothschild and British monarchy
effort to establish what is today known as the Zionist
movement. Founders of the B'nai B'rith, the Order of
the Sons of the Covenant, in the U. S. were members of
the financial heirarchy of the Rothschild circles,
including the Seligmans and Dr. Kuttner Baruch from
Charleston, S. C. , the father of British agent Bernard
Baruch. The elder Baruch was later responsible,
along with Judah Benjamin, for setting up and
financing the Ku Klux Klan.
The B'nai B'rith was ostensibly organized so that
the Jews could have their own Freemason
organization. But its real purpose was to provide the
basis from which to finance the subversion of the U. S.,
and use the U. S. as a base for deploying these
networks internationally to protect the Rothschild
interests. There were over 44 Jewish organizations in
the U. S. along which provided the Rothschilds their
"The name of Rothschild. in all countries, is a
synonym for honor and generosity. and no name in
Europe has popularity so great and so well-merited.
The Rothschilds in France occupy a social position
even higher than that of the English branch of the
family .... considered equals of the oldest of French
nobility . . . . "
"The Jewish religion has many observances and
customs corresponding to the secret societies known
to us. The synagogue. for instance, might be
compared to a lodge room . . . . The sign consisted of
the grip given with a full hand. and the magical words
Sholem Alachem. The messusah (religious artifact)
was the countersign. Shema Israel (Hear 0 Israel)
was the password. "
Both of these passages come from the original
magazine publication of the B'nai B'rith. The
Menorah. The magazine's editor was one of the B'nai
B'rith's members. Benjamin Franklin Peixotto. who
later. as a U. S. consul to Romania established the
B'nai B'rith there under the name of the Order of Zion
He also operated as a Rothschild agent in
overthrowing the government of Romania and placing
King Charles on the throne, thereby giving the
Rothschilds a firm Balkan foothold from which to
penetrate Russia.
By 1860, this secret order had established the
international Zionist networks under the name of the
Israelite Universal Alliance. It was the combination of
the B'nai B'rith and the Knights of the Golden Circle
that gave birth to the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan.
Importantly, the whole Order of Zion project was
developed during the late 1830s and early 1840s by the
Earl of Shaftesbury and Benjamin Disraeli. An 1862
expose by Samuel Morse on "The Present Attempt to
Dissolve the Union, A British Aristocratic Plot"
identified Shaftesbury as the organizer and funder,
operating from Exeter House in London, of the
abolitionist movement in the U.S. Disraeli, later to
become Britain's Prime Minister, was the key 19th
century' figure around which the Zionist networks
were built. Disraeli himself, a Sephardic Jew,
became part of the Cult of Isis after an 1830-31 sojourn
to Malta, Greece, Turkey, and Jerusalem.
3. The Knights of Ku Klux Klan
Central to the reorganization of the KGC was Judah P.
Benjamin. It should be remembered that Benjamin
never relinquished his British citizenship when he
served the U.S. Senate or the Confederacy: indeed,
right after the assassination of Lincoln, Benjamin
escaped to England, where he worked for the London
DailY Telegraph and later became the Queen's
Counsel for Lancastershire.
In December 1865, the Knights of Ku Klux Klan was
founded under the leadership of General John T.
Morgan, General Albert Pike (the latter known as the
"father of the Freemasonry in the South"), and a
small group of confederate officers, in a place outside
of Pulaski, Tenn. What is less well known is the fact
that the Knights of the KKK was Judah Benjamin's
P.rior to his escape to England, Benjamin met with
the top Confederate military leadership to establish
the basis for the consecration of the Invisible Empire
of the KKK. The financing would be provided by Dr.
Kuttner Baruch of the B'nai B'rith, who was already
in Charleston financing the secessionist movement.
The international agent deployed to England to
maintain contact with Benjamin in 1867 was a Catholic
bishop, a Jesuit named Richard Wilmer.
The belief structure of the KKK was nearly identical
to that of the Knights of the Golden Circle. The "fiery
cross" became the symbol of the new order, with
dress and other formalities identical to the KGC and
the Knights of Malta, the "hooded ones." The use of
the Greek word kuklos. meaning circle. emphasized
the continuity with the Knights of the Golden Circle
and underlined the belief in the magical power of the
circle. a derivative from the ancient cult practices of
The KKK's usefulness to the Rothschilds and the
British aristocracy was its aid in preventing any
semblance of Lincoln's reconstruction effort from
succeeding. Originally led by Imperial Wizard
General John T. Morgan, who during the Civil War
had participated in the KGC's attempts to foment
uprisings in the North, the KKK was then turned over
to a leader more suitable to the circumstances of the
postbellum South: the world's first guerrilla warfare
expert, Nathan Bedford Forrest. (Morgan had
meanwhile become a U.S. Senator.) The terrorist
campaigns that ensued thanks to the KKK are well
After the Reconstruction era, the KKK was dormant
for a few decades. But it was resurrected in 1915, when
two members of the Knights of Malta-Red Cross
organization formed something called the "Invisible
Empire," under the direction of a man named William
Joseph Simmons. The essential difference between
the original Klan and this new version was while
members of the original Klan could be Jewish or
Catholic, the new belief structure was that of a "race
purist" cult. The "Nordic" myth used to reorganize
the KKK was a parallel deployment to the
development of the Nazi ideology a few years later.
In a 1924 interview published in the English
Speaking Union magazine Landmark. Imperial
Wizard Dr. H.W. Evans announced that the Nordic
belief structure was the essence of the KKK ideology.
In a reply, Rothschild agent Israel Znagwill, the
author of a project to have Jews settle in South Africa
at the turn of the century, gave as his primary
"objection" to the KKK that it excluded Jews from its
Another of the lesser-known aspects of the KKK is
the fact that in the 1930s, Franklin Delano Roosevelt's
electoral victory in the South was due to the role of the
"Southern Roosevelt Clubs" organized by the KKK.
Meanwhile, the well-documented terror operation
against Southern blacks continued.
The reemergence of the KKK during the late 1950s
and 1960s was again centered in the South, and now its
purpose was to foment race war between blacks and
whites. With the other side of the set-up, the civil
rights movement, largely under the control of the
various liberal British-controlled networks acting
through the B'nai B'rith's Anti-Defamation League
and allied institutions, the contrived race war
scenario enjoyed sigrtificant success. Today that same
terror capability is still in place, and still under the
control of the same forces.

The new League of Just Men, on the contrary, developed comparatively rapidly. Originally it was a German outlier of the French worker-Communism, reminiscent of Babouvism and taking shape in Paris at about this time; community of goods was demanded as the necessary consequence of "equality". The aims were those of the Parisian secret societies of the time: half propaganda association, half conspiracy, Paris, however, being always regarded as the central point of revolutionary action, although the preparation of occassional putsches in Germany was by no means excluded. But as Paris remained the decisive battleground, the League was at that time actually not much more than the German branch of the French secret societies.

The League of Just Men participated in the Blanquist uprising of May 1839 in Paris. prominent members of the League of the Just: the type-setter Karl Schapper, the watchmaker Joseph Moll and others, connected with the Blanquist secret Société des Saisons which organised the Paris uprising of May 12, 1839. Schapper and Moll took part in the uprising, were prosecuted by the French authorities and compelled to leave for England, where they headed local branches of the League. Engels made their acquaintance in the spring of 1843 in London, as he wrote later in his article "On the History of the Communist League".

The League of Just Men moved to London where they founded a front group, the Educational Society for German Working-men, in 1840. While Weitling moved to Switzerland, Bauer and Schapper escaped to London. It became an international organization, which Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Johann Eccarius later joined.

The emigrant workers of other nationalities also participated in the League's activities. The internationalisation of the League and the evolution of its members' views under the influence of the ideas of Marx and Engels led to its reorganisation into the Communist League in 1847.

In their infamous 1976 book None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Gary Allen and Larry Abraham claim that Karl Marx was approached by the Illuminati - calling themselves The League Of Just Men (Bund der Gerechten) - who commissioned him to write his Communist Manifesto. The League of Just Men was said to be simply an extension of the Illuminati, which was forced to go deep underground after it was exposed by a raid in 1786 conducted by the Bavarian authorities.



Jews, Jacobins and the French Revolution ... cy_32.html

"The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which have for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and inextinguishable hated of all peoples by whom they are tolerated, and through whom they are enriched." Voltaire, the French writer François-Marie Arouet (1694-1778) who was the embodiment of 18th century Enlightenment

"Jews have to be conceived not as a sect, but as a nation. They are a nation within other nations ... The Jews are a nation capable of the most horrible crimes ... We must look at the Jews not only as a distinct race, but as an aliens. It would be a most awful humiliation to be ruled by this, the most base race on earth ... I wanted to make a nation of citizens out of them, but they are good for nothing but dealing in second hand goods. I was compelled to proclaim laws against them for their usury and the peasants of Elace have rendered me their thanks ... I decided to improve the Jews: but I do not want any more of them in my Kingdom: indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the vilest nation in the world." Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) French general who became emperor of the French and sought to forge Europe into a regenerate Holy Roman Empire

"The appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult, but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization. The managers remain studiously concealed and masked; but there is no doubt about their presence from the first." Lectures on the French Revolution, by John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, First Baron Acton (1910)

"Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name of 'Great.' The secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands." Protocols of the (Learned) Elders of Zion No. 7

"We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried away the well-being of the world. The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could not see that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be freedom." Protocols of the (Learned) Elders of Zion No. 1


By the late 1780s, the Dark Adepts of the Inner Lodge who controlled French Freemasonry had committed it to their Dark Agenda to overthrow the French government and destroy the royal House of Bourbon. They allowed the more idealistic in the Outer Lodge to believe that this subversion was justified and that it was part of a wide-ranging plan to end all autocratic regimes, not just in France. A simple-minded, naive assumption concretised in the Freemasonic slogan "Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité." Thus, the Mason dupes of the Outer Lodge of French Freemasonry had committed themselves to the World Revolutionary Movement whose ultimate aim is the sweeping away of Natural Moral Order on Earth. Moreover, had committed themselves to one of the most terrible events in European history .. the revolution in France.

The revolution in France was an astonishing event: the most startling event in the history of Europe since the fall of Imperial Rome. Here, in one of the most cultured nations on Earth and with solid foundations on Christian principles of government, a small Jacobin minority was able to enforce its will on France as that of "the people" and then set about destroying French culture and ipso facto attempted to subvert Western Christian Civilisation itself. How can this be so? How can a rag bag of loafers, foul libertines, blackguards and neer do wells overturn the ancient, lawful government of France and kill its king and queen? The answer, of course, is that this motley crew of treasonous French Freemasons did not organise the revolution. Rather, that a far more organised power with immense resources, an alien entity, was the intelligence and resource behind the terrible events in France.

When the so-called French Revolution is studied with the dispassionate eye of a true historical researcher, and not through the jaundiced eye of a professional historian, the heavy presence of Dark Freemasonry, the International Jew Revolutionaries and Jewish International Usurers can be easily discerned. Moreover, Proper Students of History, those who study the Hidden Stream of History, easily discern in the shadows, the Hidden Hands that guided these sinister powers in their actions. They perceive the Dark Power overseeing it all, the Dark Intelligence orchestrating the evil and the tumult: and with heavy hearts, they perceive the presence and organising mind of the Secret Masters of the Dark Empire of Secret Societies ... the High Initiates of the Cult of Evil. The so-called "the Elect of Freemasonry," the "Princes of Masonry." In other words, they perceive that the Black Adepts of Illuminised Freemasonry, and by them, the Cabal of Evil, had control of French Freemasonry and it was these Secret Masters of Masonry, the Inner Brethren who formed the Lodge within the Lodge, which led it into acts of High Treason against the king and heinous acts against the French people.

The Illuminati infiltration of Freemasonry had been rapid and the disease of sedition, of hatred of established order and established religion, soon raged throughout the Lodges of Europe, but especially in the Lodges of Grand Orient Freemasonry, and especially those in France and Germany.
Concomitant with the rapid spread of Illuminised Freemasonry and the World Revolutionary Movement was the rise of the Invisible Money Power whose visible, outward expression is the evil clique of Jewish International Usurers and whose baneful influence upon Western Christian Society is often called the Power of the Jewish Purse. It is the great financial power Otto von Bismarck (1815-98) called the "High Financial Power of Europe" and "masters of finance in Europe" in which the "voice of Rothschilds predominated." Moreover, a terrible power he instinctively understood would with:

"their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America, and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos, in order that the earth should become the inheritance of Israel." Letter to Conrad Siem in 1876, published in La Vieille France, March 1921.

The mechanism used by the "High Financial Power of Europe" to "plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos" was the World Revolutionary Movement operating through myriad organs but especially through the Lodges of Dark Freemasonry, often called Judaeo-Freemasonry. Moreover, a radical War Plan that was merely a modern update of the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government ... the ancient War Plan of Evil against God and against the people of the world, which is the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government. The World Revolutionary Movement is the modern War Plan of Evil whose first targets were the destruction of the Bourbons of France and then ordered society in Italy. It was also during the planning of World Revolutionary Movement that the murders of two kings were resolved upon, Louis XVI (1754-1793) of France and Gustavus III (1746-92) of Sweden.

By 1787, the Illuminati, and by this the Cult of Evil, was deeply embedded in Freemasonry and had secretly spread to France. Their agentur was the Goy Mason dupe Count Gabriel Victor Riqueti de Mirabeau (1749-91) who together with the visible leaders of the Revolution, and many unknown others, had pledged allegiance to the Dark Conspiracy; the Agenda of Evil that was nothing less, even if they knew it or not, than the wholesale subversion of Christendom using the Illuminist principles of spiritual and moral corruption, blackmail, sedition, murder, assassination and rebellion.

The revolution in France was the first significant success of the modernised War Plan of Evil; the Ahrimanic-inspired plan to tear down the thrones and altars of Christendom. And crucial to this success was the Invisible Money Power coupled to Judaeo-Freemasonry, which are now both indispensable to the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government. Thus, Judaeo-Freemasonry was the seemingly new phenomenon that had garnered for itself such power, in so a short a time, that it could organise a successful revolution by which one small section of a nation conquered all other sections; and moreover, swept away every feature of the national life and tradition of that nation. An apparently recent phenomenon of such power and energy that swept away all before it; A new and terrible force that had entered the Arena of History. Yet, the truth of the matter is that this Dark Force is very ancient indeed. Moreover, one that had been amplifying itself through the centuries and had now reached the point whereby it could destroy entire nations and their culture. Moreover, a terrible power that could do all these things and still conceal itself behind "the people" and "the mob." This, of course, was the Confederacy of Evil concealed in Dark Freemasonry, in Judaeo-Freemasonry, and enthroned in the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies.

The horrors in France could never have happened without massive material support: without the support of the Invisible Money Power but especially the Jew and his money -the terrible Power of the Jewish Purse. For, Dark Freemasonry and its World Ambition had been wedded to the Jewish One World Ambition and Jewish money had poured in to the Illuminati and used to transform Freemasonry into the "nursery school" of the World Revolutionary Movement. Put differently, the rancorous Jew with his enduring hate and enmity for the Gentile and his God, his Kabbalah and his money became essential to the success of the Dark Conspiracy for World Empire, which is nothing less than the wholesale subversion of Christendom. Thus, at the centre of the World Revolutionary Movement, the network of sedition and corruption, like a spider in its web, sat the Jewish International Usurer, the undisputed king of International Usury. Who, if not privy to the inner secrets of the Cult of Evil, was at least mindful of the ancient hatred and secret rancour his race held for Christ and therefore God, and thus aided whatever cause would assuage this enduring Jewish hate for the Gentile, his nations and his God.

The French Revolution began in 1789 with the meeting of the States General in May but it was the storming of the Bastille on July 14 of that same year that galvanised the disparate forces of sedition. In October, Louis XVI (1754-93) and the Royal Family were removed from Versailles to Paris, and then later the King attempted, unsuccessfully, to flee Paris for Varennes in June 1791. From October 1791 until September 1792 a Legislative Assembly presided over the misery, but in the face of the advance of the allied armies of Austria, Holland, Prussia and Sardinia, it was replaced by the National Convention, which proclaimed the Republic. The unfortunate Louis was brought to trial in December of 1792, and executed on January 21, 1793 and the revolutionary government soon after declared war on Britain. Mirabeau, Danton and other men of action had seen that the one great need of the Revolution, if it was to prevail without the interference of foreign armies, was the creation of a strong executive government.

The establishment of the "Committees of Public Safety and of General Security" achieved this, for the success of this Committee in suppressing the Norman insurrection had confirmed the majority of the National Convention in the expediency of strengthening its powers. Soon after, the Reign of Terror, during which the ruling faction ruthlessly exterminated all potential enemies, of whatever sex, age or condition, began. This assault on Natural Moral Order began in September of 1793 and lasted until the fall of Robespierre on July 27, 1794: and in the period known as the "Red Terror," during the last six weeks of The Terror, nearly fourteen hundred people were guillotined in Paris alone. The Convention was soon replaced in October 1795 with the Directory, which was in turn replaced in 1799, by the Consulate. Eventually, a truly historic figure arose out of the ashes of France and became Emperor in May of 1804, Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821). The so-called "Little Corporal," who, along with the other "Little Corporal" a 150 years later and better known as Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), anticipated the Great Dictator in the coming New World Order.

The heart and head of the "Great Revolution" was the infamous Jacobin club whose members included very wicked and evil men who served different gods than those in the Bible. The Jacobin club was the most famous of the political clubs of the French Revolution. Its origin was in the Club Breton, which was established at Versailles shortly after the opening of the States General in 1789 and was at first composed exclusively of deputies from Brittany, but was soon joined by others from various parts of France. Among its early members were Comte de Mirabeau (1749-91), Maximilien Marie Isidore de Robespierre (1758-94), Sieyès, Barnave, Pétion, the Abbé Grégoire, Charles and Alexandre Lameth, the duc d'Aiguillon, and La Revellière-Lépeaux.

Although the club's initial aims were benign long before it emerged as the principal focus of The Terror, its character had been profoundly changed by the elimination of the moderate elements from the club. Hence the ascendancy of two very wicked men, Jean Paul Marat (1743-93), who was a leader in the overthrow of the Girondists and was stabbed to death in his bath by Charlotte Corday, and finally of Robespierre, supposed architect of the Reign of Terror. Once the revolutionaries toppled the monarchy, the malevolent Robespierre was in effect the Jacobin Club, for, to the tribunes he was the oracle of political wisdom, and his perverted morality and malevolent standard judged all others and upon his fall the Jacobins too came to an end.

The name "Jacobins" was first applied to the club in ridicule by its enemies and comes from the building the club rented for its base, the refectory of the monastery of the Jacobins in the Rue St Honoré, near the seat of the Assembly. The name of "Jacobins" had been popularly applied to all advocates of extreme revolutionary opinions long before the suppression of the Jacobin Club. And, in this sense, the term has passed beyond the borders of France and long survived the "Great Revolution." The Jacobin club was thus an amalgam of personalities moving in various philosophical streams and revolutionary currents whose ideology was, for want of a better name and for the sake of convenience, simply called "Jacobinism."

The men who met at the Jacobin club and plotted treason were a "society of deputies" whose figurehead was Robespierre and who acted so as to concentrate power in their own hands; believing that the truth of their vision was sufficient guarantee of their authority to act. They acted to garner such power that their will would prevail over everything and everyone on the land. Moreover, since the people, being ignorant and cannot be expected to understand or willingly adopt the aims of the revolution, must be compelled towards their aims and so bent to their will. Jacobinism therefore describes not only the underlying principles of the men who met at Jacobin club but also any revolutionary movement that is determined to impose its aims at whatever cost, in the conviction that the end justifies the means. It is, of course, the philosophy and modus operandi of the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies and each and everyone of its myriad spawn. As it is also the watchword of its unholy progeny, such as the Jew Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov calling himself "Lenin" who gloated amidst the destruction of Christian Mother Russia and the mass slaughter her Christian children that he and his kind were "Jacobins tied to the proletariat."

A veritable river of blood flowed through France as The Terror raged across the land. When the French people, their culture and their religion were ritually tortured by men who were swept up by the tidal wave of hate nurtured, then catastrophically released, by the Dark Guardians of the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government. The untrue and much abused slogan "Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité" was shouted by thugs and murderers while equally the facile mantras of "common man" and "democratic rights" were proclaimed by people who thought nothing of stamping their boot in their neighbour's face. And, cast over all these outrages against common decency, public morality and natural law was the long, dark shadow of the "Committee of Public Safety and of General Security." The impersonal government entity, the bureaucratic instrument of state oppression, which, at a stroke of a pen by a functionary sitting at his desk, condemned thousands to death. For here, in Robespierre's power base, is the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and mass executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities. A bitter fruit that would not reach its fullest bloom until the terrors unleashed by the Bolshevik Zionist Jews in Russia, the Nazis in Germany and the Maoists in China. Prince Petr Kropotkin (1880-1920) the Russian naturalist, author, anarchist and soldier writing in 1909 on the eve of a truly dreadful event, the Bolshevik Revolution, whose horrors would dwarf even those that had occurred in France said:

"What we learn from the study of the Great Revolution is that it was the source of all the present communist, anarchist and socialist conceptions."

Kropotkin was of course correct, for the French Revolution was the precursor of the nineteenth, twentieth and twenty-first century assault on Natural Moral Order on Earth by Dark Forces inimical to God, Christ and Christendom. The French Revolution should therefore be seen as the first great revolution and triumph of humanism and humanist law over Christianity and Christian law. It was the second (the English Civil War the first) of the great travails planned by the Dark Adepts of Organised Evil to overturn all established order on Earth: the second of the planned revolutions that were part of a meticulously conceived agenda to subvert Moral Order on Earth that is sometimes referred to as the World Revolutionary Movement.

"The demand of the Communaute de Paris, now the Sanhedrin of the Jacobins, was, of course, for blood ... The power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robes Pierre, Danton and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue ... The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been foreigners." Sir Walter Scott's Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2

"I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I cannot bring myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this profound mystery of iniquity. But I can affirm most positively that among the authors of this plot are the agents of that system of corruption and extravagance, the most powerful of all the means invented by foreigners for the undoing of the Republic; I mean the impure apostles of atheism, and the immorality that is at its base'." Robespierre's speech before the Convention hours before his arrest and execution 28th July, 1794

"When all is said and done, it was hatred for the Church that caused the French Revolution ... The throne had been destroyed because it protected the altar." Heinrich Heine, Jewish poet whose inner rancour for the Gentile, his civilisation and his God shines forth in a frank admission of the driving force of the French Revolution: Judaeo-Freemasonry and Talmudic Jewry and their combined hatred for, and shared dreamed destruction of, Christianity

Marquis of Rosanbe: "We are then in complete agreement on the point that Freemasonry was the only author of the revolution, and the applause which I receive from the Left, and to which I am little accustomed, proves gentlemen, that you acknowledge with me that it was Masonry which made the French Revolution?" M. Jumel, a well known Grand Orient Mason: "We do more than acknowledge it ... we proclaim it!" Part of a debate, which took place on the part Freemasonry played in the French Revolution in the French Chamber of Deputies in 1904, proving French Freemasonry was the author of the French Revolution. Convent du Grand Orient 1923, p. 402, "The Illuminati control masonry."

"To the French Republic, daughter of French Freemasonry. To the universal republic of tomorrow, daughter of universal Masonry." Henry Delassus, President of the Grand Orient, toast at a big banquet in 1923 attended by many men prominent in International Affairs, some of whom were connected with the "League of Nations" organisation: quoted in La Conjuration Anti-Chrétienne Vol. I, p. 146;

Even when its visible leaders like Duc d'Orleans, Mirabeau, Danton, Marat and Robespierre were consumed by the terrible destructive powers they had help raise, the war against God and its fight against the Christian religion was resolutely prosecuted, no matter what the human cost. The Dark Powers that energised the assault on France, her people, culture and God concealed itself well. It lay well shrouded letting Danton and is kind take centre stage but which truly held the reins of power in the land, Moreover, its dark ambition to obliterate French culture was couched in revolutionary rhetoric and concealed behind such talk about "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity."

Those who study History properly, who perceive the Hidden Stream of History and the Hidden Hands guiding events, moreover, who understand the way of the world, are the Proper Students of History. And it these Proper Students of History who perceive the hidden forces operating in France in the 18th Century. Moreover, who understand that the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen intent upon improving France but, rather, an alien force whose object was to destroy everything that had been France. In fact, the very same Dark Force that descended on Christian Mother Russia in 1917 intent upon her destruction.

The knowing eye of the Proper Student of History sees the baneful presence of a dark, alien force in high places in the Revolutionary Councils. But especially, the presence of a modern phenomenon: the revolutionary International Jew who had recently empowered himself by gaining admittance into the Lodges of Freemasonry. Hence, the references by percipient contemporary observers to "foreigners" in positions of power in the Freemason-engineered destruction of Christian France.

A quaint, modern myth has it that revolutions are invariably the overthrow of a government by a disaffected citizenry who are forced by extreme circumstances to act violently to redress ancient wrongs and injustices. That is, it is "the people" or the "mob" who are the driving force behind revolutions. Moreover, that these "popular" revolutions only occur in corrupt, decadent societies drunk on self-indulgence and moral decay. A situation described in the maxim: "Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic." However, this, like many modern myths, is an absurdity.

Anyone who thinks upon the matter of revolution for even a few moments should quickly realise that revolutions can not simply happen spontaneously. That revolution is not something undertaken lightly. Moreover, that it requires enormous resources involving finance, planning and logistics. Put differently, modern revolutions are immense undertakings requiring immense organisation and vast resources. Moreover, a dangerous enterprise that requires inordinate cunning and secrecy for its successful preparation. Things "mobs" and "the people" do not posses and so could not possibly undertake such a complicated and costly operation. To think otherwise will result in total inability to recognise the source and focus of a modern revolution; but especially, failure to recognise the true significance of events. In short, modern revolutions are not the spontaneous eruption of popular discontent but the bitter fruit of a dark, organising intelligence with immense resources, power and influence that seeks to conceal itself while violently, catastrophically, changing Western Christian Civilisation.

The process of Revolution is fourfold: first, the deliberate moral corruption of the people; second to the inflict paralysis upon the doomed state, paralyse its body politic; third, the striking of the fatal blows that bring down the lawful government; and fourth, consolidation of power by the application of terror and persecution. All the while thoroughly debasing the morals of the people by flooding the country with propaganda and pornography. The inordinate secrecy and subterfuge is essential in the first process, the production of paralysis. In modern revolutions, its outward signs manifest in the doomed state as out of control national debt, loss of control of the press and the mushrooming of alien-influenced secret societies and organisations.

Debt of all kinds, personal, national and particularly international debt, is the prerequisite for the success of any revolution. It is indispensable to the planning of revolutions and is the cornerstone of the World Revolutionary Movement. That is why the Invisible Money Power is so crucial to the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government. For, its by the tightening of the debt grip by the Invisible Money Power that the life-force of a nation is slowly extinguished. When men in high places are corrupted and alien powers and influences are allowed full access into the body politic without significant opposition or complaint. Thus, soon when the debt grip has been firmly established, as the hangman's noose is put over the head, so to speak, control of every form of propaganda and political activity soon follows, together with control of financiers and industrialists. Then, the time is right for the second process to unfold: the violent, revolutionary blows. Hence, the two pronged attack: financial indebtedness, which establishes the paralysis of the nation; and the violent acts of revolution that delivers the fatal blows. Of course, the deliberate corruption of the nation's morals facilitates the whole process.

Hence, in France, before the Illuminist led revolutionary forces overwhelmed the country, a financial paralysis was making its appearance in 1780. The Invisible Money Power was by then firmly established and possessed a large share of the world's gold and silver stocks such that they had not only France in their debt but also most of Europe as well. For, with the rise of Rothschild and the various Jewish International Usurers a fundamental change had taken place in the economic structure of Europe. Hitherto wealth had been largely a measure of land possession, of crops, herds and minerals; but now a new standard was used, namely, Representative Money to which the title "credit" had been given. In other words, the old standard had ceased to be wealth and had, perversely, become debt.

Although by the 1780s the French national debt was substantial it was by no means insurmountable, except in terms of gold and silver neither of which France produce. However, it was a situation easily resolved by the French king and his advisors simply by issuing their own money backed by the security of the lands and real wealth of France i.e. based upon the old standard of wealth. Yet, this was not done. The grip of the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies and their Invisible Money Power was such that those capable of doing so either could not or would not break with the system imposed by the Jewish International Usurers. Consequently, France's debt burden become ever onerous as the bonds of usury grew heavier and more terrible. Just as the Dark Masters in the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies had planned.

Concomitant with the rise of the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies is the rise of the Invisible Money Power whose outward expression is the Jewish International Usurers, the Hufjuden, the modern court Jew made grand. The arch-manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside down the finances of Europe. Who had managed by the careful exploitation of human greed and fallibility to replace real wealth by usurious loans.

However, the knowing eye of the Proper Student of History sees that behind the Hufjuden there is another, greater force: the Occult Hierarchy, the Dark Lords of Power, the Evil Architects of the Ancient Agenda for World Government, who are also behind the new debt machine of credit creation. But, it is "the Jews" with their ancient secret rancour for the Gentile his nations and his God who were chosen by Organised Evil on Earth to be the purveyors of this ruinous enterprise. Thus, those identified as directly financing the revolution in France: "the Jews" Benjamin Goldsmid, his brother Abraham Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta, their partner, and his nephew Sir Moses Montifiore in London; "the Jews" Daniel Itsig and his son-in-law David Friedlander in Berlin, and the Jew Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace.

Walter Scott (1771-1832) in his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 1, describes the situation overwhelming France thus:

"These financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are treated by usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance with the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the most unreasonable recompenses for their advances. By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were brought to total confusion."

This then was the undoing of France. What was now planned for her and her people was the agony of violent revolution and the application of State Terror.



1. The Birth of Communism
2. The History Behind The League of the Just (a front for the
3. Karl Marx writes the Communist Manifesto for The
League of the Just
4. Nicholai Lenin becomes a member of the League of the
Just, who later changed their name to "The League of the
5. Jacobin Clubs, The League of the Just, The League of the
Communists and Bolshevism were all Illuminati fronts.
6. The plan by the modern 20th Century Illuminists to get
control of the World's Nuclear Weapons through the
United Nations.

In 1785, the Bavarian Government exposed Adam Weishaupt's plan to destroy Christianity and control governments. However, this was not the end of the Illuminati, as most historians have written. Weishaupt's plans were only interrupted and dealt with as a dangerous revolutionary force in Germany. The other nations that the Illuminati were operating in did not heed the warning from the Bavarian Government. Just a couple of years later, the plan to destroy Christianity and World Governments was first seen in the French Revolution. This same revolutionary force reappeared again in Germany, called "The League of the Just" [1], with branches in London, Brussels, Paris, and Switzerland.
Napoleon, when he came into power, would not tolerate the activities of the Jacobin Clubs with their independent opposition, so he completely suppressed it [2]. However, the Illuminati just operated under other names. It was under the name of "The League of the Just" that "Karl Marx" became a member. He was hired to update the writings of Adam Weishaupt, written seventy years earlier. Weishaupt died in 1830, but his revolutionary plans were carried on by a list of his successors.
In 1842 Karl Marx began to write revolutionary propaganda for the League of the Just, hoping to cause a spirit of unrest. In 1844, in collaboration with Friedrich Engels, and under the supervision of The League of the Just, Marx began to write the infamous "Manifest der Kommunistichen Partei," commonly known today as the "The Communist Manifesto," which appeared at the beginning of 1848 [3]. Later, the Illuminati operating under the name of The League of the Just, changed their name to "The League of Communists" [4].
The Communists celebrate May 1st as the birth of their revolutionary movement because it was the birthday of the Illuminati, founded by Adam Weishaupt. And, it is not by chance that all Communists use the "Pentagram" (five pointed star) as one of their insigia. And, it is not by chance that the Communists use the term RED to describe their revolutionary movement. The Rothschild international banking family, who for some 200 years had a great influence on the economic and the political history of Europe, was founded by Mayer Amschel Rothschild Feb. 23, 1744 in Frankfurt. He had five sons and the family name derived from the RED SHIELD on Mayer's ancestor's house.
It was Adam Weishaupt and the House of Rothschild who started this partly religious and partly political movement [5] foretold in prophecy as the "Scarlet Coloured Beast" that shall ascend out of the bottomless pit (Spiritualism). Revelation 17:3, 8.
In the 1890's this world revolutionary movement added to its membership Vladimar Ilyich Ulyanov, who changed his name to Nicholai Lenin. As the illuminati terrorist group in France (Jacobin Clubs) caused the fall of the government of Louis XVI, so did their later aristocractic brethren operating under the name of Bolshevism [6] cause the overthrow of the Tsar in Russia and cause the Russian Revolution in 1917 [7]. It will be shown later that these Communists were financed by both European and American International Bankers.
The ideas Lenin developed were directly from the Karl Marx Communist Manifesto, and the ideas founded in the Communist Manifesto were directly from the writings of Dr Adam Weishaupt, who took his orders from the House of Rothschild. Gary Allan in his multimillion best seller None Dare Call It Conspiracy, states the following about Marx's Communist Manifesto:
"If you study Marx Communist Manifesto you will find that in essence Marx said the proletarian revolution would establish the Socialist dictatorship of the proletariat. To achieve the Socialist dictatorship of the proletariat, three things would have to be accomplished. 1. The elimination of all right to private property. 2. The dissolution of the family unit: and 3. Destruction of what Marx referred to as the 'opiate of the people,' 'Religion.' "
Allan goes on to say, "Karl Marx was hired by a mysterious group who called themselves 'The League of the Just Men' to write the Communist Manifesto as demagogic boob-bait to appeal to the mob. In actualfact the Communist Manifesto was in circulation for many years before Marx' name was widely enough recognized to establish his authorship for this revolutionary handbook. All Karl Marx really did was update and codify the very same revolutionary plans and principles set down seventy years earlier by Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Order of the Illuminati in Bavaria. And, it is widely acknowledged by serious scholars of this subject that the League of the Just Men was simply an extension of the Illuminati which was forced to go underground after it was exposed by a raid in 1786 conducted by the Bavarian authorities." None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Allan, Concord Press, 1971, p. 25.
Even though Allan dates the exposure of the illuminati at another year than what we read from a Masonic book, nevertheless, it does not alter the fact that these things are historically true. Marx also called for the abolition of Capitalism, which he believed was a struggle between the bourgeoisie (the middle class) and the proletariat (the workers) [8].
Marxism tells the poor that if they would establish a dictatorship of the proletariat, which would set up a classless Communist society, everyone would live in peace, prosperity, and freedom. There would be no more need for governments, police, or armies, and all these would gradually wither away [9]. Marx said that the ruling class would never willingly give up its power, and that struggle and violence were therefore inevitable [10].
This would naturally sound terrific to some poor struggling blacks, or to the starving in the Latin American countries. But what the Communist leaders don't tell the people is that the leaders are exempt from sharing equally the material wealth of their nation. How many Russian leaders do you see among the poverty stricken? The real motive behind Communism is not to distribute the wealth of the world equally, but the Communist Party is just a front for the super-rich as an instrument for gaining and using power. IT IS NOT THE COMMUNISTS THAT RUN COMMUNISM. There is yet another controling power behind communism. Communism and socialism are just arms of a more devilish conspiracy working behind the public eye, that is not being run from Moscow or Peking, but from New York, Paris and London.
These are very serious and dangerous times. The average gullible American has absolutely no thought what is about to come upon him. Awake! Awake! This is a very serious and dangerous anti-Christian movement that has been working politically and socially since the French Revolution to destroy the sovereighty of this Nation and all nations around the world. This beast from the bottomless pit (Spiritualism) spread its poison first in Europe during the French Revolution, and from there to Russia. George Washington, even though he was a deceived Freemason, was nevertheless a loyal American, and was very aware of this International Revolutionary force to destroy all governments and religions in his own time. Des Griffin in his book Fourth Reich of the Rich, p. 57 explains how the Illuminati Conspiracy crept into America even when the 13 original Colonies were united:
"However, before the Colonies were united, the Constitution adopted, and our Republic established, fifteen Lodges of the Order of the IIluminati were formed in the thirteen Colonies. The Columbia Lodge of the Order of the IIluminati was established in New York City in 1785: members included Governor DeWitt Clinton, and later CLINTON ROOSEVELT (a direct ancestor of FDR), Charles Dana and Horace Greeley. The following year a Lodge was established in Virginia with which was identified THOMAS JEFFERSON. When Weishaupt's diabolical plans were exposed by the Bavarian government, JEFFERSON STRONGLY DEFENDED HIM AS AN 'ENTHUSIASTIC PHILANTHROPIST."
"Many strong warnings were issued about the activities of the Illuminati in America. On July 19th, 1798, David Pappen, President of Harvard University, issued a strong warning to the graduating class and lectured them to the influence Illuminism was having on the American scene. President Timothy Dwight of Yale University issued a similar warning.
"Also GEORGE WASHINGTON sent a letter to a G.W Snyder in which he stated: 'It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread to the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact than I am.
"The idea I meant to convey was that I did believe the Lodges of Freemasonry in this country had as societies, endeavored to propagate the diabolical tenets." Fourth Reich of the Rich, Griffin, Emissary Publications, 1979.
Russia is a perfect example today of what the illuminati plans are for the world. There are about 1.1/3 billion persons, or about a third of the world's population, who now live under Communist rule. However, it is estimated that only 10% of the people are actually members of the Communist Party themselves [11]. Look at Russia today and its Communist brethren worldwide. The Communist Party allow no political rivals, and the voters have no real choice among candidates. The truth is that the Communist Party itself is a highly centralized government, and only its top members make important decisions. Most Communist countries are nothing less than open air concentration camps. And, contrary to Marx's predictions, their conflicts, crime and prejudices have not vanished in these Communist countries. There is just as much centralization of the wealth of a nation for the gain of a few, at the expense of the poor and middle class, in Communist countries as there is in non-Communist countries. There can also be seen in Communist countries the same national and racial hatred they were supposed to be free of.
Who are really pulling the strings today behind the Communist World Revolutionary movement? Gary Allan's statement in his book, None Dare Call It Conspiracy, could not state it any plainer, on page 35:
" 'Communism' is not a movement of the down-trodden masses but is a movement created, manipulated and used by power-seeking billionaires in order to gain control over the world ... first by establishing socialist governments in the various nations and then consolidating them all through a 'Great Merger,' into an ALL POWERFUL WORLD SOCIALIST SUPERSTATE probably under the auspices of the UNITED NATIONS." None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Allan, Concord Press, 1971.
It is the International Bankers who are actually pulling the strings that control the affairs of Communism, not the Communists. Russia, China, Cuba, Poland, etc. are taking their orders indirectly from the super-rich International Bankers who control the commerce of this world.
Seventy years before Karl Marx came on the scene, Weishaupt told his disciples that in order to achieve this One World Government, his conspirators would have to infiltrate every agency of the governmental affairs of the nations. They first used the Masonic Lodges as we learned earlier, to begin this task. By sitting in the top seats of all governments, the Illuminati agents could eventually guide the nations toward a "Novus Ordo Seclorum," which means in Latin "A New World Order." They would accomplish this by the power of the vote which they would have while occupying positions as legislators.
However, before the people of the world would accept the Luciferian Government which Weishaupt, an apostle of Lucifer, hoped to eventually achieve, there would have to be a culture change within the societies of the people first, along with a spirit of unrest and riots in the air. The people of the world would have to be reduced into a godless society. Atheism was just a tool to destroy Christianity in France during the Revolution. Weishaupt and his "Inner Circle" were not ATHEISTS; they believed in a god. However, this god was not Jesus Christ, but Lucifer. Communism is just an anti-Christian, atheistic force to destroy Christianity and all world governments, by modern day Luciferians who actually control world commerce. Saith the Lord: "For all nations have drunk of the wine of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the MERCHANTS OF THE EARTH are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow. Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who iudgeth her. And the MERCHANTS OF THE EARTH shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more." Revelation 18:3, 7, 11.
For the benefit of any skeptic, or reader who has been brainwashed into believing that this Luciferian (illuminati-Communist-Socialistic) Conspiracy does not exist today, let us look into a warning from Winston Churchill that he wrote February 8, 1920, in the Illustrated Sunday Herald:
"From the days of SPARTICUS (Adam Weishaupt) to Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela-Kuhn, Rose Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world-wide conspiracy has been STEADILY growing. This conspiracy has played A DEFINITELY RECOGNIZABLE ROLE IN THE TRAGEDY OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION. It has been the mainspring of EVERY SUBVERSIVE MOVEMENT DURING THE 19TH CENTURY; and now at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire." Quoted from The Missing Dimension in World Affairs, Goy, p. 92.
Revelation 16:13,14 warns about the three-fold union of the Dragon, the Beast and the False Prophet that will unite the whole world whose names are not written in the Lamb's book of Life, to war against Christ and His people. The first power that will go out into the world is symbolized as the Dragon, Revelation 16:13. It is also symbolized as the Beast that Ascendeth out of the Bottomless Pit. These TWO symbols both represent Satan and his Luciferian (Illuminati-Communism-Socialistic) Conspiracy.
Like the 18th century Illuminists of the French Revolution, the New Age Movement (Spiritualism of Today) is seeking to destroy Christianity by a worldwide social transformation. Among this New Age Movement there are teachers and office workers, famous scientists, government officials and lawmakers, artists and millionaires, taxi drivers and celebrities, leaders in medicine, education, law, and psychology, who are trying to condition the Christian world into accepting this modern version of Nimrod's One World Government.
Marilyn Ferguson, the author of The Aquarian Conspiracy who is a member of this Luciferian plot herself, states the following in her book on page 26:
"The Aquarian Conspiracy represents the Now What. We have to move into the unknown: The known has failed us too completely.
"Taking a broader view of history and a deeper measure of nature, The Aquarian Conspiracy is a different kind of Revolution, with different revolutionaries. It looks to the turnabout IN CONSCIOUSNESS OF A CRITICAL NUMRER OF INDIVIDUALS, ENOUGH TO BRING A RENEWAL OF SOCIETY." The Aquarian Conspiracy, Marilyn Ferguson, J.P. Tarcher, Inc., 1980.
As we learned earlier, Communism derived out of an 18th century version of Babylonian Witchcraft (Illuminism), and it insisted on the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Francis B. Randall, Ph.D., who has taught at both Amherst College and Columbia University, states the following about Marx in his book, The Communist Manifesto, on page 37:
"He (Marx) insisted on the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions with uninhibited abandon ... Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite! Millions have thrilled to this most memorable of all appeals that have come down to us from the Romantic Age." The Communist Manifesto, Marx/Engels, edited by Francis B. Randall, Ph.D., Simon & Schuster, 1964.
As we tried to show the reader before, Communism is not a movement to help the downtrodden people of the world. But Communism is actually being run today by Capitalists, the very people who control the wealth of the world that Communism is supposedly fighting against. Very few Americans know that Karl Marx was a correspondent and political analyst for Horace Greeley, who owned the New York Times newspaper. In 1849 both Horace Greeley and Clinton Roosevelt contributed financially to the Communist League in London to assist in the publication of the Communist Manifesto [12]. Other contributors were the English millionaire, Cowell Stepney, and of course Friedrich Engels, who was a wealthy German. And, up until recently, two checks made out to Karl Marx by Nathan Rothschild could be seen on display at the British Museum. Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin were financed by Capitalists from America, England and Germany, to help promote the Bolsheviki Revolution in Russia.
What should a follower of Jesus of Nazareth do? Should we unite together and take up arms and defend ourselves? The answer is NO, a thousand times NO. This conflict is not a social, but a spiritual war. "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, AGAINST SPIRITUAL WICKEDNESS IN HIGH PLACES." Ephesians 6:12.
It is foretold that Lucifer will condition the ignorant of this world into accepting a total Luciferian Rule through Spiritualism, Catholicism, and Apostate Protestantism. In the name of Peace and Love does this great delusion come. "And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of this truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12.
The modern Luciferian One World Government plot to enslave the whole world under socialism is attackng the world by using physical force (Communism) and by subliminal warfare coming in the name of the New Age Movement. This is nothing less than a mask for the super-rich who are really the ruling class and those who control the huge secret Society of the Illuminati.
The first Russian Marxist group was formed in 1883 in the very year of Marx's death by Lenin, who was a Russian Revolutionary exiled in Switzerland. Between 1900 and 1903 Lenin called his revolutionaries the "Bolsheviki, then later renamed themselves" Communists, after Marx's term in the Communist Manifesto [13].
Lenin announced to the world before the overthrow of the Tsar in Russia the following: "After Russia we will take Eastern Europe, then the masses of Asia, then we will encircle the United States which will be the last bastion of capitalism. We will not have to attack. It will fall like an overripe fruit into our hands" [14].
Since that statement Russia, China, Mongolia, Tibet, Afghanistan, Algeria, Ethiopia, Libya, North Korea, North and South Vietnam, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, East Germany, Romania, Yugoslavia, Albania, Cuba, Chile, etc, are under Communist rule; and now Central America and Mexico are threatened with Communist guerrillas.
However, the Communist plan to overthrow the last bastion of capitalism (The United States) is to be attacked politically, socially and economically, as Lenin planned. Robert L. Preston, in his book Wake Up America, states the following:
"When Nikita Khrushchev visited the United States, he boasted that the Communists would bury us and that our grandchildren would live under Communist rule. He even outlined the exact manner in which they would accomplish it:
"You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept Communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small doses of Socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We won't have to fight you. We'll so weaken your economy until you'll fall like overripe fruit into our hands."
"As outlined by Khrushchev and Lenin, there is no intention for the Communist to attack us in battle; they expect us to fall into their hands like overripe fruit. They intend to bring this about by weakening our economic structure until we are financially insolvent and by giving us more and more Socialism until we are too weak to resist the final thrust into complete Communist rule. As we review the Socialistic and economic picture in this nation today, we are forced to admit that they have once again proceeded exactly as planned." Wake-Up America, Hawkes publishing Inc., 3775 South 500 W., Salt Lake City, Utah 84115.
Preston goes on to quote in his book on page 18, the second point Khrushchev made that was to cause the overthrow of the United States.
"The best way to destroy the Capitalist System is to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens." Wake-Up America, pp. 15-17.
There shall be wars and rumors of wars until Jesus returns. However, the world and man will not be destroyed by a world wide nuclear holocaust. The Bible makes this very clear. God's people are here and will be delivered out of this world at Christ's Second Coming. 1.Thessalonians 4:16. It will be Jesus who will lay this world in complete ruins, not the Communists. The threat of a world-wide nuclear war is nothing less than another Communist plot to frighten the inhabitants of the world into believing that a One World Government is the only solution for world peace. The reader must understand that Communism is not being run from Moscow, but by those who control the monetary systems of the world in London, Paris and New York. Do you really believe they would blow up each other?
As stated before, when Adam Weishaupt and the House of Rothschild formed their New Order for the Ages, or The Illuminati, they infiltrated the high levels of the nations in Europe through Freemasonry. Through this they hoped to be able to fill the top positions in the Old World Governments so they could legislate bills that would connect the countries according to their plans. Using social issues and humanitarian causes, the Illuminati of today have in their ranks untold millions promoting this same Luciferic scheme, and many in it are completely unawares. Millions upon millions of sincere people think they are doing the world a great service by joining this international Luciferian movement that's coming under a name today called "The New Age Movement."
Constance Cumbey, a Christian lawyer, got wind of this movement and spent painstaking months gathering New Age books and magazines, so she could expose it for what it really is. She states in her book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, The New Age Movement And Our Coming Age Of Barbarism, that the New Age Movement uses secret code names and symbols today, as we showed you earlier. One of the most important symbols in this modern day Luciferian Conspiracy is, however, the rainbow. Also called the Antahkarama, it is used in the occult as an hypnotic device. This modern version of the Illuminati calls the rainbow the "International Sign of Peace." But to the higher orders of this movement, it represents in symbolic language that they are building a rainbow bridge between the personality (man) and the over-soul, or the Great Universal Mind. This Great Universal Mind is Sanat Kumara, or Lucifer [15]. New Agers display this rainbow symbol on their cars and businesses.
After carefully investigating the publishing houses and organizations that are today promoting this modern day version of Adam Weishaupt's World Revolution, Attorney Constance Chumbey has compiled documentive proof that the New Age Movement has now a network of more than 10000 different organizations they are working through, just in the United States and Canada [16].
The modern day Luciferian Conspiracy to overthrow Christianity and all other religions that will not worship Lucifer is today called THE PLAN. It was Adam Weishaupt in the 18th century who first wrote out this Plan for a One World Luciferian Government. Then, 70 years later it was updated by Karl Marx in the 19th century. However, it was Alice Bailey whom Lucifer used to speak to the 20th century man. Alice Bailey died in 1949 leaving behind a step by step plan to destroy Christianity and all other religions and governments who will not adhere to this New Age Movement. Attorney Constance Chumbey points out in her book, The Hidden Dangers Of The Rainbow, how Alice Bailey, in The Externalisation of the Hierarcy, told New Agers to feel free to use weapons on religious groups who interfere in the political process of their movement. The New Age Movement plans to eliminate several billions of people from the earth's population. They say this must be done before the year 2000 if the world is to survive [17].
The weapons that they plan to use are NUCLEAR BOMBS, gained through the promotion of a nuclear freeze and disarmament. The countries of the world are to be pressured into giving up these nuclear weapons and they are to be placed into the hands of the United Nations so they can police the world. On page 548 of her book, Alice Bailey is quoted as follows:
"As a means in the hands of the United Nations to enforce the outer forms of peace, and thus give time for teaching on peace and on the growth of goodwill to take effect. The atomic bomb does not belong to the three nations who perfected it and who own the secrets at present - the United States of America, Great Britain and Canada. It belongs to the United Nations for use (or rather let us hope, simply for threatened use) when aggressive action on the part of any nation rears its ugly head." The Externalisation of the Hierarcy, Bailey.
The most dangerous threat for Freedom and Christianity from these modern Luciferians is coming today under the guise of WORLD PEACE.
To take control of the world, these conspirators had to get control of the world monetary systems through a Central Bank which we shall discover they have already achieved. Now they are working night and day to condition the world governments into handing over the weapons to them and place them in the very hands of those who want this One World Luciferian Government. Coming in the name of Nuclear Freeze for Peace, or Nuclear Disarmament, it has been their greatest task to get their hands on these nuclear weapons. Alice Bailey, whom these modern Luciferians follow to the letter, states the following in her book, The Externalisation of the Hierarchy:
"In the preparatory period for the new world order there will be a steady and regulated disarmament. It will not be optional. No nation will be permitted to produce and organise any equiptment for destructive purposes or to infringe the security of any nation. One of the first tasks of any future peace conference will be to regulate this matter and gradually see to the disarming of the nations."
This 20th Century Luciferian prophetess told her disciples that the nations of the 20th century will eventually hand over their nuclear weapons to the United Nations. This is their ultimate plan, because, as the reader continues to follow the history of this One World Luciferian Government Conspiracy, we will show with documentive evidence that the United Nations is the headquarters for the New Age Movement (Illuminati)!


Wikipedia Alumbrados translated from Spanish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The alumbrados (Spanish pronunciation: [alumˈbɾaðos], Illuminated) was a term used to loosely describe practitioners of a mystical form of Christianity in Spain during the 15th-16th centuries. Some alumbrados were only mildly heterodox, but others held views that were clearly heretical, according to the contemporary rulers. Consequently, they were firmly repressed and became some of the early victims of the Spanish Inquisition.

1 Background
2 Beliefs
3 Historical cases
4 Correction
5 Illuminés of France
6 Footnotes
7 References
8 Bibliography
9 External links
The historian Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo found the name as early as 1492 (in the form aluminados, 1498), and traced the group to a Gnostic origin. He thought their views were promoted in Spain through influences from Italy.[1]

The alumbrados held that the human soul can reach such a degree of perfection that it can even in the present life contemplate the essence of God and comprehend the mystery of the Trinity. All external worship, they declared, is superfluous, the reception of the sacraments useless, and sin impossible in this state of complete union with God. Persons in this state of impeccability could indulge their sexual desires and commit other sinful acts freely without staining their souls.[2]

In 1525, the Inquisition issued an Edict on the alumbrados in which the Inquisitor General, Alonso Manrique de Lara, explained how the new heresy of alumbradismo was discovered and investigated. The text then gave a numbered list of forty-eight heretical propositions which had emerged from the trials of the alumbrados' first leaders, Isabel de la Cruz [es] and Pedro Ruiz de Alcaraz [es]. After each proposition were given the grounds on which it was judged heretical. Among the odder of these propositions are that it is a mortal sin to read a book to console one's soul (No. 31), which the Inquisition's theologians described as "crazy, erroneous, and even heretical"; and that one sinned mortally every time one loved a son, daughter, or other person, and did not love that person through God (No. 36), which the theologians said was "erroneous and false, and against the common teaching of the saints". One alumbrado, seeing a girl cross the street, said that "she had sinned, because in that action she had fulfilled her will" (No. 40). The theologians commented: "The foundation of this proposition is heretical, because it seems to state that all action that proceeds from our will is sin."[3]

Historical cases
A labourer's daughter known as La Beata de Piedrahita, born in Salamanca, came to the notice of the Inquisition in 1511, by claiming to hold colloquies with Jesus and the Virgin Mary; some high patronage saved her from a rigorous denunciation.[1] She is often, as The Catholic Encyclopedia cautiously notes, "cited as an early adherent" of the alumbrados' errors, though "it is not certain that she was guilty of heresy".[2] Some recent scholars, like the Dominican historian and theologian Álvaro Huerga, who takes a relatively favorable view of her, question, on chronological and other grounds, the tendency to associate her with that movement, seeing her rather as "pre-alumbrados".[4]

Henry Charles Lea, in his A History of the Inquisition in Spain, mentions, among the more extravagant alumbrados, a priest from Seville named Fernando Méndez, who had acquired a special reputation for sanctity: "he taught his disciples to invoke his intercession, as though he were already a saint in heaven; fragments of his garments were treasured as relics; he gathered a congregation of beatas and, after mass in his oratory, they would strip off their garments and dance with indecent vigor — drunk with the love of God — and, on some of his female penitents, he would impose the penance of lifting their skirts and exposing themselves before him."[5] Méndez died before the Inquisition could bring him to trial.

Ignatius of Loyola, while studying at Salamanca in 1527, was brought before an ecclesiastical commission on a charge of sympathy with the alumbrados, but escaped with an admonition. Miguel de Molinos was also accused of sympathy owing to some similarities between his book The Spiritual Guide and the teachings of the early alumbrados, Isabel de la Cruz and Pedro Ruiz de Alcaraz.

A later case happened between the end of the 17th century and the beginning of the 18th century in Tenerife (Canary Islands). This concerned Sister María Justa de Jesús, a Franciscan nun who was accused of practicing Molinist doctrines[6] (a Christian religious doctrine that attempts to reconcile God's providence with human free will). This nun was famous in her day because she was allegedly able to heal the sick by transferring to her person the evils and diseases that afflicted them, in a manner similar to shamans in other cultures.[7] The case was investigated by the Holy Inquisition, and according to its files the nun was accused of being a phony and even a witch.[7] She was also accused of having an improper relationship with her confessor. However, he had many defenders. After her death, the Franciscan Order in the Canary Islands initiated a process of canonization that had to be halted owing to the controversy.[6]

Their correction, by Inquisitional standards, was not particularly severe. Those convicted of engaging in the mystical practices and heresy of the alumbrados were not executed, few endured long-term sentences, and most were tried only after they managed to acquire large congregations in Toledo or Salamanca. Not all, however, were so fortunate. In 1529 a congregation of naïve adherents at Toledo was subjected to whippings and imprisonment. Greater rigors followed, and for about a century alleged connection with the alumbrados sent many to the Inquisition, especially at Córdoba. In spite of this determined action, however, the heresy maintained itself until the middle of the 17th century.[2] The connection of later alumbrados, whose practices varied in different places, to the original alumbrados, Isabella de la Cruz and Pedro Ruiz del Alcaraz, is debatable, but the continuing influence of their teachings is not improbable.

Illuminés of France
The movement (under the name of Illuminés) seems to have reached France from Seville in 1623, and attained some following in Picardy when joined (1634) by Pierce Guerin [es], curé of Saint-Georges de Roye, whose followers, known as Guerinets, were suppressed in 1635.

A century later, another, more obscure body of Illuminés came to light in the south of France in 1722, and appears to have lingered till 1794, having affinities with those known contemporaneously in the United Kingdom as 'French Prophets', an offshoot of the Camisards.



Frankists and Freemasonry
April 27, 2019 In New World Order, Posts in English
It is well known in history that many Frankists joined Freemasonry after conversion to Catholicism. Much less known if there was a connection between Jacob Frank and Freemasonry. In this short article I will show that such a connection is very likely by demonstrating that the word Baałakaben, recurrently appearing in the Words of the Lord by Jacob Frank, is most naturally interpreted as Freemasonry.

Jacob Frank (1726-1791) was a Jewish Messiah from the Sabbatean tradition. Soon after Frank started his messianic career, his sect was excommunicated from Judaism in 1756.Frankists were accused of breaking the laws of morality (they were swapping wives in ceremonial nights) and of modesty (Frank claimed to be the Messiah). Apparently the Sabbatian doctrine that one should do sin in order to speed the coming of the end was accepted by the rabbinic court. Frankists were expelled from Judaism in 1756. In 1757 they disputed with Talmudists over Talmudic teachings. Notably, Frankists claimed that Talmud demands ritual sacrifices of Christians. Jacob Frabk converted to the Catholic faith in 1759. Frank was arrested on February 6, 1760, convicted of teaching heresy, and imprisoned in the monastery of Częstochowa, but he could meet his followers and remained as the leader of the sect. Frank was released from prison in 1772 after the first partition of Poland, so he benefitted personally from the partition. From 1772 to 1786 he lived in Brno. He had a court and armed guards. Frank visited the court of Maria Theresa of Austria and Paul I of Russia and Joseph II of Austria visited Frank in Brno. In 1786 Frank moved to Offenbach where he also kept a court as Baron of Offenbach.

By 1790 26,000 Frankists had converted to Catholicism in Poland. Though Frankism as a visible sect disappeared soon after Jacob Frank died (under the leadership of his daughter Eve Frank, the sect bankrupted, Eve Frank died in 1816), Frankists did survive as a group in Poland still in the middle 19th century. They married only their own and succeeded in gaining some amount of power in post-Partition Poland. They were nominally assimilated, Christianized Jews. Many of them joined Freemasonry, but they did not leave their faith, which was that Jacob Frank and after him her daughter Eve Frank was the Messiah, who eventually was to restore Jews to Palestine, as a Messiah must.

The most famous Frankist Freemason is Moses Dobrushka (aka von Schönfeld, aka Jacobin Janus Frey), a first cousin of Jacob Frank. Dobruschka founded what seems to be the first Masonic secret society practicing sex magic, the Asiatic Brethen. It was rosicrucian to be precise, but all rosicrucian is masonic: there were no original rosicrucians from 1603, many even believe that originally the rosicrucian maniphest was a hoax of Lutherian origin. Sex magic reappeared later in several rosicrucian lodges, e.g. in the states in Randolph’s lodges. Sex magic with incantations to spirits was a common claim against Freemasonry in the later 18th century and 19th century, and it is not without same basis: the origin of it is Sabbatean kabbalism.

Frankists joined Freemasonry and brought to Masonry their kabbalah. This is shown by the kabbalah of the Golden Dawn, a Rosicrusian society in the end of the 19th century. The kabbalah of the Golden Dawn resembles Sabbatean-Frankits kabbalah more than other kabbalah traditions. In proper Freemasonry, excluding societies that are masonic in a larger sense, like Rosicrucian, Theosophy and Martinism, kabbalistic study texts were read only in Mizraim and Memphis lodges. From these two facts we can conclude that Frankists joined Mizraim and Memphis lodges. These lodges were the revolutionary ones, deriving directly from Masonry behind the French Revolution. This Freemasonry was Cagliostro’s Egyptian Freemasonry, which later become Mizraim Freemasonry. After the Bavarian Illuminati was banned, Illuminati and Mizraim created Memphis Freemasonry, which was cooperating with Carbonaries and was directly involved in socialistic revolutions throughout the 19th century.

The Jacobin Club of the French Revolution was not a Masonic society. The founder of Jacobins, Maximilian Robspierre, probably was not a Freemason, but at least one leader of the Montagnards (the Jacobin fraction, which set up the terror regime), Georges Danton, was a Mason, as was and Jacques Hébert, who supported Montagnards though not formally belonging to them. Count of Mirabeau, for some time the practical leader of the Jacobin Club, was a Freemason, as were Voltaire, Marquis de Lafayette, Marquis de Condorcet and the Duke of Orléans. Quite naturally, Frankist Moses Dobruschka joined Jacobins. A link between Frankists and Mizraim Freemasonry does exist.

Though it is not possibly to deny the role of Freemasons in the French Revolution, Freemasonry tries to deny the role of organized Freemasonry in the revolution. This is incorrect since document show that organized Mizraim and Memphis Freemasonry was indeed heavily involved in subversive activities. Furthermore, almost all freedom fighters of both Americas were Freemasons, in Latin America mostly from the Lauraro Lodge, and extension of the Great American Reunion.

This much is known and accepted in history. Now, let us go to the direct link between Freemasonry and Jacob Frank. This is not a generally accepted fact and I will try to demonstrate it. In the web there are two versions of The Words of the Lord by Jacob Frank translated by Harris Lenowitz. The text is the same but only the plain text version [1] allows searching for parts of a word. The word one should search for is Baałakaben, but it is written in many ways: Baalakaben, Baalekaben, Baatakaben, Balakaben and so on. Therefore one should search for kaben fron the plain text version, the automatic search machine in the other version requires full words and cannot find all occurances.

Freemasonry is mentioned once in [1], in the following line:

“678. The gods of Framassoncy 933 will have to do that which those two did.”

Framassoncy is Freemasonry and the spelling reminds of French, as it natural since revolutionary Freemasonry was under the French Grand Orient. The paragraph that preceeds 678 gives the mission of Freemasonry:

“677. Even though there are many kingdoms in the world, that one which will now be revealed has not yet been in the world. But it cannot be without darkness and great deprivation. That, that is precisely what God showed Abraham, our father, at the time of the covenant which he made with him, 932 letting him know that his children would have to bear great bitterness and oppression.”

That is, there will be restoration and a new Israel, but only after oppression and great bitterness. Freemasonry will have to make this oppression and great bitterness in order to realize the restoration of the Jews. This is the messianic idea of the end of the world war and persecutions. It is the central idea in Kabbalah (Zohar). In the end Esau is destroyed and Jacob restored. Esaus is Christians. The same idea is explained in many ways: ten kings of Edom are destroyed, Amalek is destroyed. For Kabbalists all of these words meant Christians: those who presently oppress them. Nobody but Christians oppressed Jews in Europe in the late Middle Ages when Zohar was written.

A messianic prediction by Frank from the place 429 confirms this:
"I told you, Till all kingdoms will be turned over. 636 And you see with your own eyes how all the religions change and go beyond the borders laid down by their ancestors. A few years ago I told you too that Poland will be divided into 4 parts. A long time was needed for this to come out in the open. The rest will go along according to scale. Just so this country where we live now will be divided, and everything bit by bit."
Frank explains the messianic mission:
"1 179. That place may not be opened without blood; but it is the custom that when a break occurs, they make a dam so that water might not go out and flood. And so here: If you had gone in wholeness, then I would have sent you to the Jews and the peoples, to inform them that so it stands. You would not have had to flee like Jonah the prophet, 1431 for they would immediately have seen with their own eyes, how it burned around them and that that day is coming, and all of them would have been put under my authority and several million people would have been saved and would have proclaimed me before the whole world, that from such a low and base place as I am such a salvation would have risen and appeared to the whole world; just as Balaam said: Water will drip from his pail. 1432 That is one time. Again you would have labored at raising her from that form of the Ayalta, and she would have shone with that beauty she possesses, in view of all. And men are needed for that thing, in wholeness with God and man, without deficiency, just as that red heifer, on which no burden has been placed. 1433 Now when I can send you to such a place, on account of you it must be in difficulty and hidden several years, until Shiloh comes. 1434"
Notice what we have here. There must be blood and there must be men, who are without deficiency, like the red heifer. The red heifer was sacrificed and its blood redempted certain sins, such as touching the dead. Jacob Frank understood the mission of the Messiah in a way that has many similarities with the mission of Jesus in the Gospels.
Destroying Esau naturally included destroying Poland:
"Consider, before I entered Poland, all the lords sat peacefully and the king with them. As soon as I entered Czestochowa I told everybody and announced that Poland would be divided. Equally now must you know what is happening among kings and emperors, what they decide among themselves."
For timing purposes, Frank was arrested on February 6, 1760, convicted of teaching heresy, and imprisoned in the monastery of Częstochowa. Partitions of Poland were 1772, 1793, 1795. Frank was released from prison after the first partition. It is quite likely that Frank predicted the fall of Poland when he was arrested. After all, Christians should not arrest the Messiah, who had been kind enough to convert to Christianity. But the conversion for Frank was only an act of entering Esau for the purpose of destroying Esau: the messianic mission could not change. I find it very likely that Frank while in prison was actively plotting for destruction of Poland. In fact, the following text suggests he was consulting it with foreign kings:
"1 tell you that it is 24 years since we accepted baptism, and as then there was a consultation, and a Consilium was installed before I came to Poland, so also it has been during all those 24 years since; I sit and consult how to lead to the end. If you would have been good and would have sat among them, then you would have known what is happening, what happened, and what will happen. Just as the kings hold consult among themselves how Poland should be divided; for all things are conducted through consultations."
Frank was baptized in 1759. 24 years since that time is 1783. Jacob Frank died in 1791 setting the ultimate time frame.

After 1772 Frank was not any more positive towards Poland:
"2191. In Vienna, in May, [17]76 the Lord saw a dream: I saw the Polish king Poniatowski and it was told to me several times that his kingdom was already ended."
Frank did discuss with Maria Theresa of Austria, Paul I of Russia and Joseph II of Austria. The last apparently wanted to marry the daughter of Frank. According to [1] he was not the only one, also Adam Czartoryski wanted to marry Eve Frank.
"2202. The 16th of November. I saw that someone came to Warsaw with the news for me that the wife of Prince Adam Czartoryski had died. Then some lords came from Poland and said to me that I should give my daughter to be the wife of Prince Adam. I asked them, Will the Russian voivode elders permit that? They answered me, The old prince has given permission and wants to give an estate. I said to that, If the prince will cede half his estate to me for my daughter then I will give her to him as wife."
The background of this paragraph is that Czartoryski family had invited Russians to Poland and elected Stanisław August Poniatowski as the king. Stanisław August Poniatowski was not a son of the previous king Augustus III of Poland, who incidentally was also Frederic Augustus II of Saxonia, instead his mother was Czartoryski and he was related to the Stuarts. Stanisław August Poniatowski was a lover of Catharine the Great and in his time Poland was under the power of Russia. This is why Frank asks what the Russian voivode elders would say. Stanisław August Poniatowski was also a Freemason. The Adam Czartoryski was not a Freemason, but his son with the same name was and the older Czartoryski was a supported of Enlightenment. Princess Elżbieta Izabela Czartoryska was also a Freemason and in love with Stanisław August Poniatowski. Thus, Poland was at this time in Masonic hands.
Following the ideas of Enlightenment Stanisław August Poniatowski tried to reduce some rights of Polish nobility, which caused a civil war, the War of the Bar Confederation 1768-72. Ponioatowski also introduced changes in the Great Sejm and in the Constitution of 3 May 1791 trying to establish a constitutional monarchy. Another Freemason, Tadeusz Matuszewicz, a member of the Sejm, is also linked to the Constitution of 3 May 1791. The constitution removed the liberum veto. All members of the Sejm had liberum veto, so a single member of Sejm could effectively hinder decision making, which is catastrophic during wartime. Introduction of the constitution was interpreted by Russia and Prussia as a step for creation of a stronger Poland. It lead to a war between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the union of Russia and the Targowica Confederation of conservative Polish nobility. The latter won the war and Poland was partitioned second time.
Stanisław August Poniatowski was the god father of Jacob Frank in his baptism, yet Frank was not so fond of Poniatowski:
"2192. In Vienna also in that year the Lord saw a dream: I saw the Polish king Poniatowski angry with me and my daughter and wanting to beat us."
This would be in 1776. Frank had naturally been enprisoned by Poniatowski, but also the removal of liberum veto was not good for Frankists. The position of Jews as almost nobles in the Polish Commonwealth was so strong that converted Jews of Lithuania got automatically a noble rank. This partially explains why Frankists after conversion to Christianity got quite much power. I do not know if any Frankists were in Sejm, but probably they would have qualified. In any case it seems that Jacob Frank was not in favor of Poniatowski's Freemasonry. Indeed, Poniatowski's physician Jacques Calmanson, a Polish Jew and a Freemason, opposed Frankists. Calmanson tried to remove privileges of Polish Jews in order to assimilate them. These actions, partially implemented by Prussia, could only be experienced as persecution by Jews. For his services Calmanson was payed a salary by a Masonic lodge. Thus, we have a very complicated situation. Jacob Frank was opposed to Polish Freemasons.
But there was also Frederick II the Great of Prussia. He was the head of German Freemasonry. Originally Frederick the Great had supported Polish reformers, but when it seemed to lead to stronger Poland, he changed his mind. Frederick the Great proposed partitioning Poland in the first partition and supported Russia in the second partition.
Let us go to the word Baałakaben in [1]. As Jacob Frank was a kabbalist, the word might mean some spiritual power, but does it? Let us first notice that Jacob Frank had some source of money as he managed to keep a court and a unit of armed men. It is usually understood that the money came from his followers, but these followers remained after Jacob's death, yet Eve Frank very soon bankrupted. Baałakaben is many times said to have treasures. Some understand it so that as a kabbalist, Jacob Frank believed that by using correct spells he could find treasures buried in the ground. This is what grimoles promise, e.g. those in the Sixth and Seventh Books of Moses, but Jacob Frank actually had a source of money and that could not be from imaginary treasures buried in the ground. Without money none of the royals who did visit and admit Frank would hardly have been so kind. Frank was seen as a bridge to the Jews. Assuming that Baałakaben are not spirits, we get a characterization of them.
This section shows that Baałakaben make questions similar to the Masonic catechism:
"to those Baatakaben, who also hope for a certain thing; there you would have spent 7 days. They cannot come to me for they are legless now; equally because I am baptized; another thing cannot come to me, because I am baptized. Near them are two guards; the first is a league tall and has a weapon 1/4 league long in his hand. He would ask you, Where are you going? What are you treading and what is your name? You would already know what to answer him, for even your names would have been those established by the mouth of God himself. 1360 1 would have summoned you by those names. Likewise you would have shown them a pass from me. They would have blessed you. The first guard would have said in this way: Be you blessed of that God in whose thought it was to create all the worlds. When you would have come near the second guard, taller than the first, he would have asked you in a voice which could be heard 10 leagues the same questions as the first had given you. The same answers being given as those there, you would thereafter have shown him the pass. You would have heard what he had to tell you."
Baałakaben use secret passwords:
"1023. None knows of the place of the Baatakaben, but the Maiden has given me to know where their place is. I would send you with my pass, only two words from me; but to tell you those two words with my mouth I cannot, but I can only give them to you on the pass."
Baałakaben are some kind of a secret group:
"1 178. Those Baatakaben are very learned. At their [place] on the doors stand displayed these verses just as you have read stood at the first doors: A stranger who enters dies. 1429 If I had sent one from you, even though with a single sign, then you would have explained those same verses which are displayed at their [place] like the above expressed
verse & & ... Then they would understand by themselves that God makes new things on earth, 1430 and they would carry out your desire fairly and would honor you with honor and wealth."
But they are not Jewish kabbalists: Baałakaben come from many religions:
"1082. Those Baatakaben are legless up to the knee. They fly in the air and have the capacity to fly over all Europe in one hour; their wives are just like them and their children too. There are Jews, Catholics and Turks among them, for there must be no deficiency in any place. There are many learned ones among them, and those possessing great wisdom, knowing moreover that such a time will come when they will be of help. They see and are themselves unseen. At times they appear to people, for they know that
through people they will be of help when the time comes. They have nothing in their hand now, but only to be guards over all the treasures that are found in the world. If you had been in wholeness, I would by now at least have sent you with such words and they would have sent me a million or two million ducats."
Baałakaben have given an oath.
"Baatakaben are men in wholeness and there is no blemish upon them: They came from the tribe of Dan, 1521 but only on account of a certain thing, before one emperor and on account of an oath, their legs were taken from them."
Baałakaben gives orders to Jacob Frank (paragraph 1241):
"And now what am I to do with you? If I were told to send you, I would send, but they do not order me and on my own I cannot act."
They are also funding Frank:
"I told you of the Baalakaben; it stands long ago clearly among you that that already was in the ancient times of those great men, and they supplied them with money. And that which I told you of Ell-Szaday, and you were not able to tolerate it, and that is the gate to God, without which one may not enter."
Baałakaben are not spirits, they are in some place:
"Czestochowa, then I would have brought you before her so that you might be fastened to her; then I would be able to send you to the Big Brother, as was said. Here in Briinn if you were in wholeness I would at least be able to send you to the Baatakaben."
"1112. Those Baatakaben went forth from their first place because they saw a thing and went from there. But they are in the mountains of Bohemia."
"806. If I had sent you to the Baatakaben with a pass from me /:around 10,000 householders of them live in the Czech mountains, they have their own king."
"They are found in the mountains of Switzerland, the Tyrol and Hungary."
"Many of them are found in Poland."
There is an issue of Baałakaben not having legs. It may refer to the Freemason initiation ritual where a new brother uncovers one of his leg to the knee. To a kabbalist Jacob Frank it may have looked like an offering of a leg.
"Those Baatakaben are legless up to the knee. They fly in the air and have the capacity to fly over all Europe in one hour; their wives are just like them and their children too. There are Jews, Catholics and Turks among them, for there must be no deficiency in any place. There are many learned ones among them, and those possessing great wisdom, knowing moreover that such a time will come when they will be of help. They see and are themselves unseen. At times they appear to people, for they know that
through people they will be of help when the time comes. They have nothing in their hand now, but only to be guards over all the treasures that are found in the world. If you had been in wholeness, I would by now at least have sent you with such words and they would have sent me a million or two million ducats."
The next does sound a bit mysterious, but it may mean three types of Freemasons. Those, who have only passed the initiation ritual where they uncover one leg, those who arrange revolutions, and the third type, who are like spiders, full of legs.
"679. The Baaiakaben have a triple body: one is legless and they are only capable of crawling on their knees. The second body has wings with which they can fly several hundred leagues without stopping. But the third is entire with legs. But in that last body, they are forbidden to go beyond their borders. The women likewise. All three bodies have one shape. There are many lords among them but there is only one king over all their lands. They have Brothers and Sisters, for there must be Brothers and Sisters in every place. Their king has somewhat greater power than his Brothers. Only those who are Brothers and Sisters may be sent to them. Of the women it is not possible to send unless there be 7 of them left behind and 2 of the Brothers. If you came there and said that there is one in the world who has established Brothers and Sisters, then they would be greatly rejoiced; for it is known to them that through me they will be repaired. I told you that we were all going to make the repair, that is to those places where there are Brothers and Sisters. They are very learned. If you told them that teaching is not now necessary then they would understand immediately why it is not necessary and would give theirs up. They would lead you to their king; they would give you great presents and the power to fly like themselves for that is in their hands. You would already see there who would come towards you and you would see yourselves there. If one went there then he would be asked that another come there and thereafter yet another. Then if that messenger returned to me, they would come here to ask of the one that I be sent there. You would spend 8 days there and come back in an hour."
Only the messiah can release Baałakaben from their oath:
"1 196. The legs were removed from those Baatakaben because they took an oath to the king. Even God himself cannot now help them; only one can come and help them with the aid of God, and that is what they are waiting for. But it is in my hands to give them legs."
Finally, Jews control the treasures of Baałakaben:
"1 106. Those Baatakaben are legless, and half their body is precisely like ours. There are different nations [at their place]; a great many Jews with beards, and they are greatly learned. There were few of them after creation, but now they are many. There are Truebelievers among them, both from the First and the Second. Until their times it was the custom of Caesar, as well as Alexander the Great, Nebuchadnezzar, Ahasuerus, Solomon, and all the kings with fortunes, that they would bury their treasures in the earth so that their successor might not boast of their collection. Every one of them would take a loyal Jew and give him an oath to be a faithful guardian of the treasure for the time being. After taking the oath, they cut off his head and laid him there cut up so with the treasure. Then those Baatakaben who are Jews came to such a Jew and resurrected him and reattached his own head but they took his legs so that he became as they are; and such until now are the guardians of those precious treasures. Those Baatakaben have their kings and lords, which lords have the power to give away as much money as they want, but they may not give from a great treasure without the permission of the king. They too hope to come to this world and get legs. They cannot come to me for the above mentioned reason, but I could send two people to them and could give them only a sign that they should send me great sums. Then the king himself, after I had given him that advice, would send me treasure beyond estimating. Their language is just like ours, nb of the Jews, 1369 and many of them know Hebrew. But those Jews who look after the treasures have power beyond the Baatakaben, recalling their first name and what they were. They see and are themselves unseen."
The last words of the messianic mission. It is to fix the world, Tikkun Olam, which, unfortunately for us, means destruction or enslavement of us, just as the Old Testament prophesies (written by Jewish priests around 500 BC and without any truth in them) tell. Baałakaben, being mainly Christians, will also be destroyed, but some might be saved:
"1259. The Baatakaben are men in wholeness and there is no blemish upon them: They came from the tribe of Dan, 1521 but only on account of a certain thing, before one emperor and on account of an oath, their legs were taken from them. They complained before God. He replied to them, Indeed the whole world has a deficiency and there is nothing stable in it, so there must be a deficiency in you too; but one will come and repair all the deficiencies, at that time your repair will be made. They hope for that, that one will come who has received baptism, and that one will repair them. They see that I have already come to the world, and they see that I need money, but I can take nothing from them on my own, for I am afraid they might want to test me with riches; but through you I might take from them."
I think this is enough for concluding that Baałakaben means Freemasons. Because of the political situation they were German Freemasons, led by Frederick the Great. Yet, there must be some Jewish legend of men who have taken an oath and who should come to the help of the Messiah. Some Jewish books tell of them. This is clear from the following quotes:
"1273. In the beginning those Balakaben were men such as we and were great students. Their number was small; because of a certain thing they were knocked out of this world and their legs taken from them. They took wives from this world and they bore them children. Now there are many of them. The same thing happened with the Schaydim; but from where they were created I cannot reveal to you. If it were revealed to you, you would now know where we are going and where we will tread. The Schaydim also took women from this world and therefore they do good for men."
"307. The Lord said in Czestochowa, Not far from here there is a cave, and that is the very cave of those Baalekaben, or the leg/foot-less, about whom your books tell."
There is a similar tale in J. R. R Tolkien's Lord of the Rings, the Return of the King. The messiah figure orders the dead living in the mountains to fulfil their oath. The dead of the mountain kill all visitors. They are bound by an oath and only the messiah can release them. In Tolkien the dead men are not without legs, like in Jacob Frank, but in many ways the tales match. Tolkien has a similar character, Mim the dwarf, in the Children of Húrin. Mim lives on a mountain, guards a treasure and has many stereotypical Jewish features. Tolkien often used real myths as the starting point. The hero Túrin in this book is based on Kullervo from the Finnish Kalevala. This is know it because Tolkien freely translated the story of Kullervo and it has early elements of the story of Túrin. Likewise, Mim is most probably freely based on some old legend.
In the real life economic support does not come from imaginary treasured. Masons can pass for the dead in the mountain: they have death symbolism in the skull and bones. Masons included some Jewish millionaires, and they were the first pre-Zionists. Jews were restored to Palestine very much as prophecies say: there was the great suffering and the war. Every part of prophecies had to be realized, thus Freemasons were needed as the legends had such characters. It is likely that the mission of Shabbatai Zevi was connected with British Zionism and the plans for the Temple of Solomon by Judah Leon Templo, and Freemasonry was created for the specific purpose of fulfilling a role in the messianic mission.
Frankists are a particularly easy target as Judaism does not support them. Indeed, Frankists were expelled from Judaism. Some so called conspiracy theoreticians make the connection between Frankists and Freemasons. Helen Nesta Webster noticed the connection as the first one. Today she is called by the always as reliable Wikipedia a far-right conspiracy theoretician, despite the fact that she was very cautious in her conclusions. I find her conclusions quite well supported, considering the time they were written. Another author who has made the connection of Freemason with Frankists is Rabbi Marvin Antelman. He appears to be a disinformation agent directing attention to Frankists. Frankists disappeared long ago an their legacy is the pro-Israel attitude in Masonry. It is not realistic to think there are any Frankists left, and the only Sabbateans are the followers of Turkish Dönmeh, not a major threat to a modern society. Of course it is not so, there are no Frankists, their contribution was to give Mizraim and Mephis Freemasonry a clearer kabbalistic and messianic program.
Later Jewish bankers, like Jacob Schiff, involved B'nai B'rith into the messianic task of restoration of the Jews. Though this mission was Masonic, a non-Masonic Zionist organization was created to be a front to the Jewish people. Today it is B'nai B'rith's ADL that proposes the Holocaust as an icon and calls all critizism antisemitic. Freemasons do not have power anymore. But the financiers of all, and B'nai B'rith and ADL, this still have power.
What one should understand from all this is that the program is messianic. Jesus was a Jewish prophet Messiah. There was to be a Jewish king Messiah, Herod Agrippa I, but he was poisoned and there was no comet, which was to appear. When the war did start in 66 Jews lost it, as they believed in prophecies and help from God instead of training martial arts. This defeat transformed Jewish messianism to Christianity as we know it today. It is not Christianity of St. Paul, or of Jesus. St. Paul thought that Gentiles are without sin because they are not under the law, thus they should not be circumscribed because then they will be under the law and sinners. As Gentile Christians were without sin, they could not be redeemed from their sins. They had the role of redeeming and otherwise helping Jews. This is why St. Paul collected gifts to the Poor of Jerusalem, i.e., to Essenes, Jewish Christians. As a payment of it, Gentile Christian martyrs would go to Heaven because an offering to God raises to Heaven, but the offering must be prefect: therefore Christians should try to be perfect. It was not because of their sins, but because of being offered as sacrifices. Jesus failed, but Shabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank did not fail: the remnant of Jews was restored to Palestine. But it was not done by Yahweh or the Christian God, it was done by the gods of Framassoncy, and all prophecies are not yet filled, but notice that nothing good comes from a Jewish messiah, it is only war, genocide and enslavement.
I add Jacob Frank's opinion of Jewish people, just to show that we all have every right to condemn Jacob Frank:
"807. There is no people like the Jews. They are like snakes and crocodiles, for there is no love at all among them, but only jealousy, hatred and contention one against another; but it is by far the worst in Poland. Therefore it stands: The evil will open from the north. Everything else will be revealed from there as well. 1066 1 brought you out from them, so you might not do their deeds."

[1] The Words of the Lord [Jacob Frank], translated by Harris Lenowitz


sf comment

I think it is like this. Originally it was a white conspiracy. They wanted to create a “good” new world order (democracy, later socialism), though it was not good for non-whites. (Selling opium to China, killing American Indians, enslaving the Blacks and so on.) The first stage of this conspiracy was Cagliostro’s Egyptian Freemasonry before the French Revolution, then it was known as Philaletles and later as Mizraim. Egyptian Freemasonry inspired Bavarian Illuminati, when Illuminati was banned, Johann Bode set it up in France under the name Philadelphes, which later was called Memphis. Leftists came from a Christian background with Christian ideas and Memphis was largely leftist, working with Carbonaries and the New Europe movement. Both Masonic rites stopped their activity to the general amnesty to revolutionary Masons after the Paris Commune failed. Maurice Joly targets Mizraim in his dialogues. It was the real force behind Napoleon III and saint-simonists. The idea is a false democracy where press is controlled, though it looks free, a totalitarian system that does not look like it.

Communists started their activities around 1848. They copied the methods from the French Revolution, Masons and Carbonaries. The rites of Mizraim and Memphis were joined 1890s and the subversive plans become known to other Masons and Theosophists, who probably did not participate in them and maybe did not know/believe much of any Masonic conspiracy. Both Theosophists and Martinists tried to warn about Communists. Theosophists composed Protocols using Joly’s book and Mizraim documents, as a warning of a conspiracy. B’nai B’rith and Jewish bankers, like Jacob Schiff, were backing the Communists. So it was partially a Jewish conspiracy.

Were Jewish bankers (or Jews in genera) involved earlier? I think not in the beginning.
In Jacob Frank’s Words of the Lord (in the web there is a translation, Slow Pan original) there is Baalakaben, which I interpret as Freemasons (cannot be anything else considering all instances) and the Frankfurt man, but this Frankfurt man is probably Frank himself, no clear trace of Rothschild. Then when it comes to Rhodes’ secret society, there was Rothschild, but not in an active role. In the early Masonic conspiracy Rothschild was only a funder of wars and wanted to join the white leaders. Mizraim lodge members were Catholics, some of them Frankist/Sabbatean converts, but not many. They read Kabbalah (actually only a short study text) and called their highest order Sanhedrin and the members Rabbis, but they were just self-defined Jews, not genetic Jews. (That is, those evil people who took the ways of Jews, as we can read in Maurice Joly’s dialogue.) Masons and British Protestants started Zionism with some Jewish Masons and Kabbalists, but lost control of it soon after 1840. Antisemitism was intentionally created in Europe (e.g. by Wagner’s society) and I see it as a part of Zionism: antisemitism was created in order to push the Jews to Palestine. So I conclude that Jewish bankers and B’nai B’rith came to the picture around 1840s-1870s and they got influence in the USA after a large number moved to the USA.

Fed (1913) had to be created with banking partners. As many bankers were Jewish, they had influence on it. The same is probably true with the income tax of 1913. Whites were ruling the USA at this time, so if these are part of a conspiracy, then it was Masons. In the start of WWI Masons had a role. This war fulfilled many Masonic goals: destroyed three monarchies, raised the USA to a world power, created a homeland for Zionists, was a war to end all wars by being senseless. But it probably was created more by bankers and they also had a Zionistic goal.

Very clearly what there is today is not a Masonic conspiracy and not a Communist conspiracy. But it uses similar methods: destroy the pillars of the society. So, we should expect: destruction of the core family, removal of boundaries and mixing of people, attacks to Christianity,… all this. The method relies on infiltration, as with Masons. It is simply a textbook case of a takeover.

What to do? In the third part of Mad Max, the one with Tina Turner, there is a dwarf riding an idiot giant. When the useful idiot giant is killed the dwarf is overcome. He escapes to the place in the desert where the children wait for their savior. With these conspiracy things you have to read fantasy and horror stories, like Frankenstein, Tolkien or Matrix. Serious writers do not propose solutions.



Alexander Parvus: Trotsky’s Mentor from Hell

Posted on June 25, 2012 by INCOG MAN

From: Under The Sign of the Scorpion by Juri Lina

The Jew millionaire Alexander Parvus (real name: Israel Helphand, or Gelfand), transformed Lev Bronstein into the cynical and sadistic commie known as Leon Trotsky.

Parvus* was born in 1867 in the town of Berezino in the province of Minsk in Byelorussia, but grew up in Odessa where he finished college in 1885. He then continued his studies abroad. In 1891 he passed his final exams at the University of Basel and left as an economist and financier. He later look a doctor’s degree in philosophy.

He worked for several years in different banks in Germany and Switzerland. He also became a skilful publicist who understood how perfectly the phraseology of Marxism could conceal political and war crimes. Parvus had studied the history of Russia and knew that the country would be quite helpless if the nobility and the intellectuals were eliminated. All these ideas made a great impression on Leiba Bronstein and Vladimir Ulyanov. Alexander Parvus, as a professional criminal, wanted to transform Russia into a base for international speculators and criminals who would hide under the name of “social democrats”.

Lenin believed this to be impossible since Russia was not rich enough and wanted to use Switzerland for this purpose but Trotsky agreed with Parvus. Parvus was therefore the man behind Trotsky’s theory of the permanent revolution.

Parvus is seen here yukking it up with Trotsky and Leo (or Lev) Deutsch, another vile Russian commie Jew.

Trotsky echoed, like a parrot, that Russia must be thrown into the flames of the world revolution.

The author Maxim Gorky characterized the socialist Parvus as a miser and a swindler. He had often put the famous author’s royalties in his own pocket.

Once, when he did this, the German Socialist Party’s honorary tribunal (Karl Kautsky, August Bebel, Klara Zetkin) condemned him morally. After this, Parvus travelled to Constantinople, where he became advisor to the Young Turks (i.e. the Jews). He mediated trade between Turkey and Germany and became exceedingly wealthy in the process.

For a time he also edited the newspaper Arbeiter-Zeitung.

The Attempts at a Coup d’Etat in 1905

Parvus wrote as early as 1895 in the periodical Aus der Weltpolitik, which he himself financed, that war would break out between Russia and Japan and that the Russian revolution would be born out of this conflict.

In his series of articles “The War and the Revolution”, published in 1904, he also predicted that Russia would lose the war against Japan. The international capitalists wanted to begin a “revolution” in St. Petersburg in connection with Russia’s defeat in the Russo-Japanese war in 1904-05. The chief organizer, Alexander Parvus, received two million pounds sterling from Japan to organize the seizure of power in Russia. (Igor Bunich, “The Party’s Gold”, St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 33.)

The war began with a Japanese attack on Port Arthur (now Lushun) on the 9th of February 1904. It was, above all, the European banks belonging to rich Jews, which financed the Russo-Japanese war. All possibility of credit was shut off to Russia while Japan had unlimited credit. The most important Jewish loan-shark, Jacob Henry Schiff in the United States of America, supported the Japanese military forces with a loan of 200 million dollars, according to Encyclopaedia Judaica.

The Jerusalem Post admitted on September 9, 1976 that it had been Schiff who lent the money needed to construct the Japanese navy. Several British banks built railways in Japan and financed Japan’s war against China. It was the same Jacob Schiff who made sure that no banks were permitted to lend money to the Russians.

At the same time, he supported “revolutionary” Jewish groups in Russia. Encyclopaedia Judaica called these “Jewish self-defence groups”. The Provisional Government was later given all possible financial aid from his banking house Kuhn, Loeb & Co and other banks.

Encyclopaedia Judaica characterized Jacob Henry Schiff as a “financier and philanthropist”.

The Jewish capitalists wanted to seize power in Russia in the name of the workers. Parvus and Bronstein-Trotsky believed the time was ripe when the Russians lost Port Arthur on the 2nd of January 1905 (20th of December 1904). Parvus and Trotsky immediately began to organise major provocations, strikes and riots. The Social Revolutionaries had terrorized the nation as early as in 1904.

Demonic Jew Freemasons and Capitalists clearly conspired with violent commie Jews to takeover Russia and destroy her Christian monarchy — no matter how many millions of innocents would have to die. Will we let these murderous rats do the same here to America? [INCOG]

This freaky Jew punk was the bud of Sergei Romanov’s assassin, Ivan Kalyayev (above right). The Kabbalistic Remizov wrote bizarre, totally twisted-in-the-head horror stories, much like Jews in Hollywood today. Gentile Russian writer and intellectual, Andrey Bely, once alluded to Remizov being a “petty demon.” Maybe he was on to something?

The Zionist Socialist Workers’ Party, which took part in this revolution, according to surprising information in Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem, 1971, Vol. 15, p. 657), had been formed in Odessa in January 1905 for subversive purposes. The Jews’ secret society Kagal (Kahal) was also involved. The general public has never heard that a secret Jewish society that called itself Kahal (Council)† had been operating in Russia since the 19th century.

Suomen Tietosanakirja, but the Russian encyclopaedias, of course, knew nothing about it. The first major action organised by Alexander Parvus together with his Jewish comrade Peter (Pinhas) Rutenberg, was later called “Bloody Sunday”.

On the 9th (22nd) of January 1905, the freemasons Parvus and Rutenberg placed their Jewish terrorists (chiefly Social Revolutionaries) in different trees in the Alexandrovsk park and ordered them to shoot at the guards by the Winter Palace. The soldiers were forced to return fire to protect themselves. (Igor Bunich, “The Party’s Gold”, St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 33.)

All this has only now been revealed from the Communist Party’s secret documents. The official history has up to now been an audacious lie: the soldiers in front of the Winter Palace were supposed to have opened fire on peaceful demonstrators. 150 were killed and a further 200 were wounded following this provocation.

The Tsar was shocked. He gave a subsidy to the collection for the dead and their families. He even received a “revolutionary” delegation in a fatherly manner. The Social Revolutionaries’ terror organization was infuriated. Bloody Sunday was skillfully exploited by the “revolutionary” propaganda, which claimed that “thousands of people lost their lives”. Similar myths are spread even to this day.

The preparations for a national coup had begun. The Jewish terrorists Roza Brilliant, [Ivan] Kalyalev and others murdered the Tsar’s uncle, the governor of Moscow, Grand Duke Sergei Romanov, on the 4th (17th) of February.

Parvus, Trotsky and their Jewish accomplices organized and coordinated bank-robberies, mutinies on the armored ships Potemkin (June 1905) and Ochakov and on a further ten warships, revolts in Kronstadt, Sevastopol and other places. The Jewish Bolshevik Leonid Krasin (actually Goldgelb, former criminal and stockbroker), together with Parvus’ bandits, committed bank-robberies, murdered policemen, bought weapons — all to destabilize Russia.

This is the point where the Swedish Jew Salomon Schulman should be quoted:

“Few today think of the Jews’ important role, both ideologically and practically, under the pioneering period of the socialist movements.” (Dagens Nyheter, April 12, 1990, B 3.)

For this reason, I unearthed some facts about the role of the socialist Jews in the struggle for Russia in 1905-1906.

Lieutenant Peter Smidt, who in November 1905 agitated for mutiny on the warships in Sevastopol, openly boasted that he was the weapon of the Jews (Novoye Vremya, March 1911). Parvus and Trotsky were given plenty of aid from the United States, where the Jewish millionaire Jacob Schiff even in 1890 organised and financed training for Jewish “revolutionaries” from Russia.

It was B’nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant), the Jewish Masonic organization, that planned the instruction for those training courses. The same order also played an active role in the so-called revolution in 1905. (“The Ugly Truth About the ADL”, Washington, 1992, p. 27

Adolf Kraus, Grand Master of B’nai B’rith, truthfully said to another liberal freemason, Count Sergei Witte (married to the Jewess Matilda Khotimskaya), during the Russo-Japanese peace negotiations in the summer of 1905, that the Jews would unleash a revolution on Russia if the Russian Jews were not given free hands to act. The peace treaty was signed in Portsmouth on the 5th of September (23rd August) 1905. The American financier Jacob Schiff was present. Witte described this event in his “Memoirs”.

Before this, “revolutionary” leaflets (printed in England) had been spread among the Russian prisoners of war and thousands of Jewish “revolutionaries” from the United States of America had been sent to Russia. These Russian-Jewish terrorists protected themselves with American passports. The acts of terror, however, were so brutal that Russia refused these Russian Jews the right of American citizenship. B’nai B’rith, whose headquarters were in Chicago and whose pompous representation is evident even in Washington, was behind these acts.

The organization was founded on the 13th of October 1842 in New York by 12 Jewish men, symbolizing the 12 Jewish tribes who were to rule the world. Many leading figures within this movement were militant advocates of slavery, among them Grand Master Simon Wolf. B’nai B’rith’s first lodge in Europe was founded in 1885 in Berlin. There were 103 lodges in Germany in 1932. B’nai B’rith was the only Masonic organization allowed to continue operating even under the Nazi rule.

Today B’nai B’rith is the largest Jewish organization in the world. In 1970 it had 500,000 male members spread over 1700 lodges in 43 countries and 210,000 female members in 600 lodges (Encyclopaedia Judaica). There are presently 70 established lodges in Europe. The only lodge in Austria is called Maimonides.

The organization works to secure the power of the Jews over humanity, as revealed by the Hungarian Jew Aron Monus in his book “Verschworung: das Reich von Nietzsche” (Vienna, 1995, p. 149). B’nai B’rith is an executive organ for L’Alliance Israelite Universelle. The official budget before 1970 was 13 million dollars. B’nai B’rith’s secret service, the ADL (Anti-Defamation League), has been called the KGB of the extremist Jews.

Jewish terrorists had been active in Russia already before this but in 1905 the terror assumed unprecedented proportions. The fanatics began to murder without discrimination. One of the worst terrorists was the Menshevik Vera Zasulich (1849-1919). In 1878 she [almost] murdered the mayor of St. Petersburg, Fiodor Trepov, with a large-calibre revolver but was acquitted by the court on the 31st of March 1878. Other leading Jewish terrorists were Movsha Strunsky, Feig Elkin, Roza Brilliant and Feldman. They all followed the tradition of the infamous Jewish terrorist Grigori Gershuni.

The social revolutionary Gershuni was behind the murder of the Minister of the Interior, Dmitri Sipyagin (1902), the attempt on the life of Obolensky, governor of Kharkov and the murder of Ufa’s governor N. Bogdanovich in Bashkiria (1903). Gershuni was sentenced to death in 1904. He was pardoned by the Tsar and given life imprisonment instead. Gershuni managed to escape. He was praised as a hero throughout Europe.

Gershuni’s right hand was Yevno Azef (1869-1918), the son of a Jewish tailor. It was often he who planned the murders performed by the Social Revolutionaries’ terrorist section. Yevno Azef was involved in several important plots, among others the one against Vyacheslav Plehve, the Minister of the Interior, who was murdered on the 28th of June 1904. (Carroll Quigley, “Tragedy and Hope”, New York, 1966, p. 99.)

Azef had already managed to infiltrate the police as an agent of the Social Revolutionaries in 1892, but never revealed the murderous plans of the terrorists since he knew the intentions of the police. He was eventually forced into double-crossing both sides. In 1908, the social revolutionary central committee discovered that Azef had betrayed his own comrades who then decided to kill him, but he managed to escape abroad. On the 7th (20th) of October 1905, all the trains stopped.

On the 8th of October, St. Petersburg was paralyzed by a general strike which spread to other large cities on the 12th (25th) of October.

Power stations, banks, restaurants and hospitals were closed. No newspapers were published. Nothing worked. Agitated masses crowded in all the large cities, waving red flags and standing on street corners, listening to Jewish speakers who demanded an end to the tsarist regime. Already in April 1905, Trotsky had released a leaflet encouraging the people to overthrow the Tsar.

Trotsky had returned from Switzerland in January 1905, but his activities with the subversive movements reached their peak precisely in October. The Tsar’s advisor, Sergei Witte, demanded on the 9th (22nd) of October that Nicholas II should either summon the Parliament, the Duma, and have him named Prime Minister or have to use force against the masses. The Tsar followed this advice and Witte became Prime Minister on the same day.

Parvus and Trotsky founded the first Kahal, which was called soviet in Russian, on the 13th (26th) of October 1905. This soviet began with 40 council members, all of whom dreamed of seizing power. All “revolutionary” activity was coordinated from this Jewish organizational centre, which was camouflaged as a workers’ council. The chairman at the beginning was the Jew Peter Khrustalyev (Georgi Nosar).

His closest collaborators were Leon Trotsky and Alexander Parvus. The other leading members were neither poor peasants nor workers, but Jewish conspirators and freemasons: Grever, Edilken, Goldberg, A Simanovsky, A. Feif, Matzelev, Bruser and others.

These people were supposedly representing the Russian working class, despite the fact that no one had elected them. Trotsky believed the Soviets to be an excellent means with which to continue the traditions of the Paris Commune. He hoped to win power for himself through the chaos they caused. Parvus and Trotsky continued to feed the flames of the general strike and the resultant national chaos though their secret network. The instigators actually believed the tsarist regime was about to break down.

The soviet had intended to keep the general strike going as long as possible, but the workers’ eagerness to revolt faded away.

The agitators no longer had the people behind them. The Tsar also announced a manifesto on the 17th (30th) of October, in which he promised that suffrage would be broadened and that the legislative power would be divided between the parliament and government. The people began to calm down. Trotsky, who had his 26th birthday on the 25th of October (November 7th), was deeply disappointed.

The attempt to take power had failed.

[As we know, criminal International Jewry eventually succeeded in 1917. — INCOG]

Two commie Jew women from Vitebsk from the time (Vitebsk was possibly where secret police NKVD Jews dredged up the monster, Vasili Blokhin, world record holder for hands-on executions). Anarchist and Marxist Jews like these two were all over Russia and the Western world; the Russian “Red” revolution was really a huge transnational racial effort of the Khazar Ashkenazi Jew to subvert and destroy White Christian nationhood — one that continues even now (but using different tactics, like immigration and PC brainwashing to first soften us up). “Soviet anti-Semitism” was pretty much just a cover story for the West to spin Jewish gang warfare. International Jewry proudly considers commies, like the two women above, as heroes to this day (note the photo came from a museum called the “Ghetto Fighters’ House”). The Jews could care less how many “goyim” were slaughtered in revolutionary strife, secret police headquarters and gulags, or the tens of millions they purposefully forced into death by starvation across the blackened land. It’s only ever Jew victims they give a damn about. [INCOG]

This race has been in a silent war against us for over one hundred years!

* Note how the Jew changed his name to Parvus. He was born Israel Gelfand (the writer spells it as “Helphand”). Changing names is a common tactic of Jewry. They fully realize how much more profitable it is for them NOT to be recognized as Jewish by understandably suspicious non-Jews. This should tell you a little something, something on the real deal with this criminal race.

† The KAHAL is sometimes spelled the “Kehel” or “Kehelih.” The Ashkenazi Jews are only loyal to their local Kahal. Goyim government, police and courts mean nothing to them. Each local Kahal takes orders from Kahals further up the chain and all of it is secret to the Goyim. These mothers certainly have a major Kahal yanking the chains of America today


Parvus Donmeh

Marxism and the Fall of the Ottoman Khilafah: The curious case of Alexander Israel Helphand
Muwahid Vs Marx Biography, Communism, Donme, Germany, History, Islamic History, Jews, Marxism, Ottoman Empire, Russia, Soviet Union, Turkey, Western History, World War One November 15, 2017 8 Minutes
1867 -1923
Sometimes called a real life James Bond and described by his biographer as the Merchant of Revolution and at various points in his life an Undesirable Eastern Immigrant in the heart of the West, Marxist Intellectual, Starving Journalist, Theater Producer, Millionaire (Billionaire in modern terms) Capitalist arms dealer, playboy, Revolutionary, Free Mason, White Color criminal unafraid of stealing from his own colleagues, Western Expatriate in the heart of the Islamic Khilafah, Shadowy Government Adviser, Secret agent trusted by neither his Revolutionary Colleagues nor his German employers and a major player in the first quarter of the twentieth century whose deeds continue to impact the modern world . Alexander Parvus was all that and more, but known to all who met him including one time friends and students as a scoundrel.

Born in the Russian Empire in 1867 in a Jewish family at birth he was named Israel

Russian Nobleman of Christainised Tatar origin Georgi Plekanov was the first Russian to self identify as Marxist. Until 1917 Plekhanov was Russia’s leading Marxist. During World War he foreshadowed Stalin in turning toward Nationalism
Lazerevich Helphand (also spelt Gelfand) by his parents later on in life he would take on the name Alexander. His importance to modern history including that of the Islamic world as well as Russia and Germany is matched only by his obscurity.

Parvus upbringing was similar to many Russian Jews during his era, born in a Shetl or Ghetto in the Pale of Settlement at a young age Parvus moved with his family to Odessa, then the center of Jewish cultural life in the Russian empire, growing up he felt that he had being persecuted by the Tsarist regime for his Jewish origin due to the regime turning a blind eye to anti-Jewish programs due to this he became lifelong enemy of the Tsarist regime.

At age 19 after encountering the writings of Russian Marxist intellectuals Parvus migrated to Switzerland in order to study with Russian emigre dissidents like Georgi Plekhanov and Pavel Axelrod. While in Switzerland Parvus earned a PHD in Philosophy and Political Economy from the University of Basil. After graduation he migrated to Germany where he became a leading member of the SDP a leading Marxist organization, during this time he supported himself by writing for various Marxist publications including Lenin’s Iskra.

When the SDP split between the followers of Karl Kautsky an Orthodox Marxist

Eduard Bernstein was the founder of the Social Democratic or Liberal Marxism which would later evolve into the progressive movement and one of the first supporters of Homosexual Rights
nicknamed the Pope of Marxism who advocated a Communist government and Eduard Bernstein a Social Democrat who advocated an early version of Liberal Progressive Marxism with a belief in Democracy and Liberal values like Freedom of speech as well as being among the first socialists to write positively about Homosexuality.

During this time Parvus mentored a number of famous Marxists drawn to his Orthodox interpretations in particular his views on the Permanent Revolution which had largely being ignored by Marxists until that point. These students included Lenin, Rosa Luxembourg (whom he formed an informal romantic relationship with), Kurt Eisner and Karl Radek.

The most important of Parvus students however was Leon Trotsky. Trotsky’s unique interpretation of Marxism can be traced to Parvus in particular the idea of permanent revolution. Like Parvus Trotsky born Leiba Bronstein was born in a Jewish family and raised in Odessa before migrating overseas to link up with Russian Marxist living outside Russia.

Leon Trotsky the leader of the Communist Revolution in Russia and Founder of the Red Army was Parvus’s main student

Following the split between the Bolshevik and Menshevik factions of the Russian communist party Trotsky spent almost two years with Parvus in Munich before the pair returned to Russia in 1905 to participate in the St Petersburg Soviet which had being established in the wake of mass demonstrations against the Tsar. The pair was arrested together when order was reestablished in St Petersburg although both managed to escape soon after. Parvus would never return to Russia, although he maintained a strong interest in its affairs until the end of his life.

After returning to Germany Parvus continued with his Journalistic activities but also began to look towards other means of making money and subsequently became a involved in German Theater industry. In 1908 however he was accused by the famous Russian author Maxim Gorky of stealing royalties and to avoid controversy he fled to the Ottoman Empire.

In the Ottoman Empire Parvus soon became an agent for the Vickers firearms company

Parvus, Trotsky and an associate Lev Deutsch soon after being arrested in 1905
and the famous arms dealer Basil Zahraoff. This work as an arms dealer would cause Parvus to become a billionaire in modern terms. While living in Constantinople Parvus was contacted by the Young Turks movement who asked for his help in their plot to overthrow Sultan Abdul Hamid II. Parvus accepted and would play a key role as an adviser to the Young Turks from 1908 – 1915 rising in 1912 to become editor of their official newspaper Turk Yulcu.

Why Parvus a Marxist would support an officially nationalist movement supporting a nation of which he was not a member and more particularly an ethnicity (Turkish) of which he was not a member requires some further analysis.

One possible reason is that as a secularist he supported the Young Turks as is common in the Muslim world where the divide is not left vs right but Islamic vs Secular as shown in Egypt in 2013 when the Liberals, Marxists and Nationalists ran together as Hizb al Sahwet Misr‎. Another possible answer is that he saw them as what is referred to in Marxist theory as a bourgeois revolution, before the workers revolution. Another

Basil Zahroff nicknamed the Mystery Man of Europe was an Ottoman- Greek arms dealer and one of Parvus’s employers during his stint in the Ottoman Empire
possible reason is that Parvus believed that the Young Turks were going to win anyway so he might as well curry favor with the winning team allowing him to expand his business interests to a military based faction who’d be eager to buy new weapons (how Capitalist of him).

The answer may possibly lie in the fact that although the Young Turks marketed themselves as a Turkish Nationalist movement which believed the Ottoman Empire was weakened due to the state holding territory of Non Turkish Muslims, the reality was very different. The leadership of the Young Turks was made up in large measure though not exclusively of Donmeh. The Donmeh are a secret sect in the Ottoman Empire outwardly they professed to be Muslims but secretly they adhere to the doctrines of Sabbatai Sevi a 17th century Rabbi who claimed to be the Messiah.

Although of Jewish origin the Donmeh are considered heretics by Orthodox Jews due to their participation in deviant acts such as orgys and wife swapping as religious rituals. In

Munis Tekinalp (Moiz Kohen)
Often considered the Primary Philosopher of Kemalism and associate of Parvus, Tekinalp born Moiz Kohen was an ordained Rabbi and one of the few professed Jews to play a leading role in the Young Turk Movement and He later became a Primary adviser of Kemal Attaturk
addition a small number of professed Jews such as Tekin Alp (born Moiz Cohen) and Emmanuel Carasso were involved in the Senior level of the Young Turk movement. Carasso head of the Masonic lodge in Salonika was amongst the three men who visited Abdul Hamid to tell him that he’d being officially overthrown (the other two Mehmet Cavit Bey and Talat Pasha were of Donme origin).

It is possible due to his Jewish origin Parvus felt some kindred spirit with the Young Turks, however not all of the Young Turks were of Jewish origin indeed Yusuf Akcura the man who initially contacted Parvus was an atheist of Russian Tatar origin. Additionally of the three Pashas who were considered to be the leaders of the Young Turks two Enver and Jamal were not of Donme origin (Talaat Pasha who became the Grand Wazier was the third).

Interestingly both Enver and Jamal would later return to their Islamic roots falling their fall from grace with Jamal travelling to Afghanistan to help the Modernization of the Afghan military and Enver who traveled to the Soviet Union initially as an ally of Lenin before defecting over to the Basmachi Islamic resistance to the Soviet Communist forces.

The Three Pashas – Talat, Enver and Jamal, although they advocated Turkish Ethnic Nationalism only Jamal was an Ethnic Turk, Enver was of Albanian origin and Talat was of Donme origin
It is also possible what Parvus a Free Mason supported the Young Turks due to membership of the same organization as the Young Turks maintained close ties with Free Masonry, gathering in Masonic Lodges which were classed as homes of foreign residents and thus according to Ottoman law, Ottoman authorities had no right to search them.

Another potential cause is that Parvus as a lifelong Revolutionary simply desired the thrill of return to underground revolutionary work similar to the St Petersburg Soviet after years of working as a theater manager and arms dealer. Which if any of the above reasons motivated Parvus we will mostly likely never know however he did and this is an important reminder to Muslims of the reality of Marxists and other Leftists.

Sultan Abdul Hamid II (rahimullah) – Last Sultan of the ummah to hold any power and a greater defender of Islam and Muslims from its enemies
Following their takeover with the help of Parvus the Young Turks proceeded to secularize the Ottoman Empire and oppress non Turks including Muslim Arabs and Kurds as well as Armenian Christians. The Young Turks also executed many Muslims who resisted them such as Devis Vahdeti an Imam, Journalist and close friend of Said Nursi who despite his criticism of Abdul Hamid II defended him in the face of the Un-Islamic Young Turk movement who he worked to expose the Young Turks unislamic roots and nature.

Kemal Ataturk the dictator of Turkey from 1923 – 1938 was a member of the Young Turk Movement.

Parvus left the Ottoman Empire for Germany after contacting German Government officials convincing them he could use Russian Revolutionary groups to undermine Russia from within thus allowing Germany to win the war. Parvus’s plan was so controversial that he met with Kaiser Wilhelm II who he succeeded in convincing of his Plan and in 1917 Vladimir Lenin and a group of Revolutionaries were smuggled into Russia in a German train in an incident frequently referred to as the sealed train. Parvus himself choose to remain in Germany rather than return to Russia, which suggests that he may have being involved in underground Marxist activity.

Kaiser Wilhelm II – Last Emperor of Germany – Parvus who just a Decade earlier had being viewed as an undesirable Immigrant upon return to Germany has a wealthy businessman had at least one personal meeting with the Kaiser
In 1919 following the defeat of Germany in World War One, Marxist groups throughout Germany rebelled and succeeded briefly in establishing small Communist states, but were quickly defeated by returning German Veterans. Although Parvus did not directly participate the fact that his former close companions in particular Rosa Luxemburg and Kurt Eisner were leaders of these movements suggests he played a role although to what extent is unclear.

In 1924 Parvus died as one of the 10 richest men in Germany, before quickly vanishing into obscurity.


Zemen, Z 1965, ‘The Merchant of Revolution: The Life of Alexander Israel Helphand”, Oxford University Press

Karomerilogu, M 2004, “Helphand-Parvus and his Impact on Turkish Intellectual Life’, Middle East Studies, Volume 40, issue 6, pp.145-165

Baer, M 2009, ‘The Dönme:Jewish Converts, Muslim Revolutionaries, and Secular Turks’, Stanford University Press, Stanford

Service, R 2009, ‘ Trotsky a biography’, Macmillan Publishers

Deutscher, I 1954, ‘The prophet armed: Trotsky, 1879-1921’, Verso



What is Cultural Marxism?
BY EDITORIAL STAFF - February 10, 2019
IDEOLOGY. The anti-Nordic homosexual lobby is often described as being “Cultural Marxist”, but what is Cultural Marxism? Where did it come from, and what are its goals?

Aspects of Cultural Marxism

Marxism entered the world stage in 1847 when the Jew Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published The Communist Manifesto. It’s important to understand that communism’s ultimate goal was always a worldwide revolution and worldwide government. As it was the rich, white West that dominated world affairs at that point in time, it was the West that communists sought to attack, believing (with good reason) that the rest of the world would fall after the West was conquered.

Communism won a substantial victory when Russia was captured during the “Russian” revolution in 1917. The Marxists believed that world war would cause the workers to rise up and seize power in Western countries – but it didn’t happen; the workers didn’t revolt, despite the destitution that followed WWI. The Marxist theorists subsequently set about determining how they could achieve world revolution and world government now that the Western working class had abandoned the idea.

Vladimir Lenin
The Jew Vladimir Lenin
The new Bolshevik regime’s first leader, the Jew Vladimir Lenin, had a vision of attacking the West by liberating its colonies and mobilising them against their former rulers. Lenin’s intention was to cut the West off from its important mineral and energy resources in the colonies and thus bring it to its knees.

Another highly regarded Bolshevik, the Jew Leon Trotsky, wanted to use racial divisions to achieve worldwide revolution, and saw the potential of exploiting racial strife between whites and blacks to promote a revolution in the USA. It was partly due to pressure by Trotsky that the Socialist Workers Party adopted a racially charged resolution in New York in July 1939. This resolution argued that blacks had been the most oppressed section of American society for centuries and thus encouraged “complete and unconditional support” for their “fight for freedom in the proletariat revolution” against their “imperialistic repressors”.

Leon Trotsky
The Jew Leon Trotsky
After World War I, two other leading Marxist intellectuals, Antonio Gramsci in Italy, and the Jew Georg Lukács in Hungary, posed the question as to why the working classes had not revolted. They both arrived at the same answer: that the working class had been indoctrinated by Western culture, and that this culture had to be removed before a communist revolution could occur. This was the beginning of “Cultural Marxism”. The emphasis was now on eradicating Western society by destroying the culture, rather than via purely economic and political methods, as had been detailed in the writings of Marx and Engels.

Gramsci in particular became famous for designing a strategy to destroy the West from within. Rather than relying on what he saw as an unreliable working class, he advocated the “long march through the institutions” as a means to revolution. The Marxists would take over the schools, the media, the churches, and all other institutions that safeguarded Western culture. Gramsci’s strategy has proven to be extremely successful, so much so that it’s no exaggeration to say that all the West’s cultural institutions have now been usurped by Marxists.

Georg Lukács
Sex education in schools was important in the dismantling of Western culture, according to the Jew Georg Lukács
Georg Lukács has had an even greater influence than Gramsci. In 1918 he became the culture minister of the short-lived Bela Kun government in Hungary. He asked the famous question, “Who will save us from Western civilisation?” and answered it by institutionalising what he referred to as “cultural terrorism”. One of the key components in cultural terrorism was introducing sexual education in Hungarian schools.

This attack on Hungary was unsuccessful, however, and the Hungarian working class became so furious that Lukács was chased out of the country. Lukács later showed up in Germany in 1923 at a “Marxist week”, a seminar sponsored by the Jewish millionaire Marxist Felix Weil. Weil and other participants at the seminar were fascinated by Lukács’s theories on Cultural Marxism, and Weil subsequently used some of his personal fortune to establish an institute at Frankfurt University, which later became known as the Frankfurt School. The purpose of the School was to discover a way to recruit new classes to the world revolution, following its rejection by the working classes. The intellectual framework created by the Frankfurt School became known as Cultural Marxism, or more popularly as “political correctness”.

Frankfurt School members: The Jews Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno
From left to right: The Jews Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno
In 1930 the Frankfurt School appointed a new director, the Jew Max Horkheimer. Later, other intellectuals joined its ranks, like the Jew Theodor Adorno, the Jewish psychologists Eric Fromm and Wilhelm Reich, and a young Jewish student by the name of Herbert Marcuse. It was at this point that the school broke away from the traditional Marxist view that culture was determined by economic factors and instead argued that culture is an independent and important aspect of society. The school also asserted that the working class would never bring about the world revolution and that it was therefore necessary to find new social classes that would. The question as to who should replace the working class as the spearhead in the world revolution was first answered many years later by Herbert Marcuse…

The Frankfurt School subsequently worked to amalgamate the ideas of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. Under the influence of Freud and others, the School understood that appealing to the masses’ feelings was much more important than appealing to their reason. Freud’s nephew, Edward Bernays (who is practically unknown today but is one of the greatest influencers of the 20th century), developed theories on how to brainwash the masses. Bernay’s theories were later augmented by the British Tavistock Institute et al., and thanks to modern means of communication such as newspapers, radio, TV, film etc., the brainwashing of the masses has become practically ubiquitous and almost complete.

Sigmund Freud
The Jew Sigmund Freud
One of the most influential publications by the Frankfurt School was The Authoritarian Personality by Theodor Adorno. The book is a polemic against “prejudices and discrimination”, chiefly of white people’s “discrimination” towards blacks. It was succeeded by the Jewess Betty Friedan’s feminist revolution, which was aimed at Western men. White heterosexual men were cast as arch villains and were accused of racism, sexism, homophobia and so on, with the ultimate purpose being to destroy white Western civilisation.

Topless Femen activists
Globalist-sponsored feminists praise white genocide
Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution was realised by the Frankfurt School via means of a technique called “critical theory”. According to Max Horkheimer, it was the social theory of criticising all aspects of Western society, with the ultimate purpose of eradicating it. Horkheimer’s theory led to extremely destructive criticism of the West, particularly in the fields of religion, homogeneity, norms, family, morality, tradition, culture, sexual morals, loyalty, patriotism, masculinity, nationalism and conservatism.

When the National Socialists came to power in Germany in 1933, the Frankfurt School fled to the USA, but most of its members returned after 1945. Herbert Marcuse remained in America after the war, where he demonstrated an uncanny ability to popularise Cultural Marxism, and thus had an enormous impact on future generations. His Eros and Civilisation continued the synthesis of Marx and Freud and advocated for “liberating Eros” to create what he called “polymorphous perversity”. This was a continuation of Georg Lukács’ theories on using sexuality to destroy Western civilisation. Eros and Civilisation became extremely popular among the hippy movement in the 1960s.

Marcuse wrote in The Carnivorous Society [1970]:

One can rightfully speak of a cultural revolution, since the protest is directed toward the whole cultural establishment … there is one thing we can say with complete assurance. The traditional idea of revolution and the traditional strategy of revolution have ended. These ideas are old-fashioned … what we must undertake is a type of diffuse and dispersed disintegration of the system.

What Marcuse meant by a “type of diffuse and dispersed disintegration of the system” became clear when he popularised what he termed “the great refusal”: a process that utilised sexual liberation and the black and feminist revolutions at universities to convince students to hate white Western heritage. Marcuse used naive students as useful idiots by exploiting their sympathy for the poor and repressed coloured people of the world. As a result, students supported Trotsky’s permanent revolution without understanding what it really entailed.

Black Lives Matter rally
History repeats itself…
One should bear in mind that the liberation of blacks and women was not a goal but a means for the Marxists. Cultural Marxists used blacks and women as useful idiots in order to fragment society via a divide-and-conquer tactic. The ultimate purpose was to destroy Western white civilisation, bring about world revolution and impose a world government.

The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds. The beliefs, attitudes and values of the West were subsequently dissolved, and millions of Western men and women would later come to believe and value the opposite of that which they did previously. It was a revolution of human thought.

Cultural Marxism cartoon

The dissolution of the moral order brought about by the Cultural Marxists led to an altered perception of the white race. The worth of the white race in general – and Western men in particular – was downgraded, while the worth of all other races was raised. This was accomplished via ingenious propaganda, especially in school textbooks and the media. The Cultural Marxists were extremely clever at claiming that Western men were guilty of all the world’s woes, including war, slavery, racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia and the repression of the lower classes. They aroused feelings of pity and sympathy for designated “victims” in the lower classes, while simultaneously demonising whites.

This moral dissolution of the Western moral order – together with systematic destruction of Western values – was the basis for the next step: the physical eradication of white civilisation. The Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women”, drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.

A woman looks lovingly at her baby
White women must achieve “self-fulfilment” through education, jobs and careers, according to Cultural Marxists. Children and a family life are “obstacles”
It is important to remember that the purpose of communism/Marxism is not the sharing of wealth; rather it is to concentrate all power in the hands of a few individuals and create a society in which they can live in luxury while the rest live in poverty or mediocrity. This is how communism has worked throughout history.

This is fact is overwhelmingly documented and clearly visible in today’s society. The Marxists have worked unrelentingly for 150 years to change the West’s view of itself, with the intention of initiating a process that leads to a social dissolution and the white West’s erasure. The Marxist social revolutionaries who strive to dismantle the Western power structure have written a vast number of books on the subject. These include the works of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky, Gramsci, Luckács, Ernst Bloch, and Frankfurt School members like Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm, Wilhelm Reich, Leo Löwenthal, Frederick Pollock, Franz Neumann and Herbert Marcuse.


Freud FS

The purpose of the Tavistock Institute Is pure Satanism, designed to control humanity away from their evolutionary potential by degenerating society through the message of Free Love - Free Homosexuality, Free Incest, Free Pederasty, Free Bestiality and Free Transexuality and also Free Drugs - Heroin, Cocaine, Alcohol, Crack Cocaine, Fentanyl, Oxycontin, DMT, Ayahuasca, Peyote, Mescalin, Mushrooms, LSD and Weed, Marijuana and mind numbing, 20x stronger genetically modified Marijuana or Soma and taking the heart of society, depressing, and making gloomy through Satanic Jacobin, Bolshevik and Feminist Equality, and Fraternity Masonry, Socialism, Communism, Frankfurt School, Freudian Psychoanalysis, Social Justice Warriors, .... and "Music, Movies and Architecture to Suicide By" - Adorno.

Basically the Satanic way is taking something pure - a pure human being and then perverting him. They say it is not possible to cheat an honest man. But the aim of evolution is to create someone who can only choose to do the right thing. The Satanic choice is a Test.

The Satanic choice is always easy in the beginning but gets more and more bitter over time. The Pure Godly choice is always difficult in the beginning, but over time gets sweeter and sweeter.

The Satanic Sabbatean Frankist roots of MKULTRA, the Frankfurt School and Freud and his Psychoanalysis was the Satanic fundament of a project from the Satanic Tavistock Institute.

Satanic MK-Ultra, the Satanic CIA's infamous "mind control" program, was an extension of the behavior control research conducted by the Satanic Tavistock Institute and completed by the Satanic Rockefellers.

This Hidden Elite was said to be financed by the Satanic Sabbatean Frankist Rothschilds and their friends. The Satanic Sabbatean Frankist Rothschilds are the front for the Vatican Bank being in charge of all it's 500 TRILLION DOLLAR investments.

The Satanic Tavistock Institute was formed at Oxford University, London, in 1920 by the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), a sister organization to the Satanic Rockefeller Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) created by the Round Table, the Tavistock Clinic became the Psychiatric Division of the British Army during World War II.[1]

The Satanic Tavistock clinic took its name from its Satanic Bloodline Family benefactor Herbrand Russell, Marquess of Tavistock, 11th Duke of Bedford. The Dukes of Bedford was the title inherited by the influential Drug Running Russell family, one of the most Satanic aristocratic families in Britain who came to power and the peerage with the rise of the Tudor dynasty.

Satanic Herbrand Russell and arch-conspirator Satanic Lord Bertrand Russell shared the same great grandfather, John Russell, 6th Duke of Bedford. Satanic Bertrand Russell was descended from John Russell’s third son, Bertrand’s grandfather, John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, who served twice as Prime Minister of the England in the 1840s and 1860s.


Satanic Herbrand Russell’s son, Satanic Hastings Russell, Lord Tavistock, the 12th Duke of Bedford, went on to become patron of the British Peoples Party, a far-right political party founded in 1939 and led by ex-members of Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists. It was he whom Rudolf Hess flew to England to contact about ending World War II.

The basis of the project of the Satanic Tavistock Institute was explained by Round Tabler, Satanic Lord Bertrand Russell, who is considered one of the founders of fake satanic analytic philosophy refuted totally by Goedel - along with his predecessor Gottlob Frege and his protégé Satanic Ludwig Wittgenstein, and is widely held to be one of the twentieth century's premier Fake Satanic logicians.

Satanic Russell offered a revealing glimpse into Satanic Frankfurt School’s mass social engineering efforts, in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society:

I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology... Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called "education." Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part.... It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

…Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.[2]

A successor organization, the Satanic Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, was then founded in 1946 under a grant from the Satanic Rockefeller Foundation when it separated from the Tavistock Clinic.

According to John Coleman, a former British Intelligence agent, it was Satanic Tavistock-designed methods that got the US into World War II and which, under the guidance of Dr. Kurt Lewin, established the OSS and then the Deep State Kennedy Assassination CIA.

Satanic Tavistock became known as the focal point in Britain for psychoanalysis and the psychodynamic theories of Satanic Sigmund Freud and his followers.

Satanic Tavistock is ostensibly a British charity concerned with group behavior and organizational behavior. Satanic Tavistock engages in educational, research and consultancy work in the social sciences and applied psychology. Its clients are chiefly public sector organizations, including the European Union, several British government departments, and some private clients.

Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the US through the Satanic Stanford Research Institute (SRI), Satanic Esalen Institute, Satanic MIT, Satanic Hudson Institute, Satanic Brookings Institution, Satanic Aspen Institute, Satanic Heritage Foundation, the Center of Strategic and International Studies at Jesuit Georgetown, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Satanic RAND Corporation.[3]
Satanic Marx was an Agent of the British Satanic elite controlled by Satanic Ambassador Urquhart who wrote the notes for Marx to write "Das Capital" in his office in the British National Library in London. Marxism, later Communism and Socialism was used to split society in Russia and China, take over society via fake green revolutions and thus create Totalitarian Societies like Soviet Russia and Communist China with no middle - bourgeois - class, only Trillionaires and Slaves.

After the Czar of Russia freed the serfs or Russian slaves, the Trillionaire Oligarchs of Britain and USA saw a fantastic opportunity to take over Russia and strip it of all it's wealth thus the Marx Communist takeover of Russia by Lenin and then by Stalin, both puppets put in charge by the British and Americans. The death toll to maintain control was 60 millions of people tortured, sent to death camps and murdered.
After the removal of Japan from Manchuria after the second world war everyone expected Sun Yat Sen to be put in charge of China. Instead the trillionaire oligarchs who control the CIA poisoned Sun Yat Sen, threw out Chiang Kai Chek into Formosa and put in charge Mao Tse Tung a Yale trained 33rd degree freemason puppet of the oligarchs. The death toll to maintain control was 100 millions of people tortured, sent to death camps and murdered. And counting..
Currently there are two million Muslim Uigurs in death Camps in China. Death Camps too for Christians, Buddhists and Falun Gong. All prisoners are genotyped and their organs put on the Wordwide market for Sale. When some rich old man oligarch wants a new heart, liver or kidney they kill and eviscerate the prisoner in one of ten execution vans they have in every city of China - all of them working full time - and send the organ to Japan for insertion.


Both "Communist Societies" Soviet and current China were and are Kleptocracies where a corrupt elite steal all the money and launder it out of the country into British, "Pirate of the Caribbean" Banks or Switzerland, whilst the rest of the people are slaves.
On the path of a totalitarian, "New World Order" International Companies moving to China to make use of their low cost slave population have hollowed out industry and Wealth in the USA on the path of a coup to take over the USA and use internet social scoring to take away Travel, bank accounts and free speech in order to create the Chinese Totalitarian system in USA and Europe.
These revolutions were similar to the 4th generation warfare revolutions around Europe in the 1990's. Coups similar to CIA Coups in every country in the World.

The Satanic Tavistock Institute’s projects were a follow-up on the work of the Satanic Frankfurt School, a predominantly Jewish group of philosophers and Satanic Marxist theorists who fled Germany when Hitler shut down their Institut für Sozialforschung, “Institute for Social Research,” at the University of Frankfurt. The school’s main figures sought to learn from and synthesize the works of such varied thinkers as Kant, Hegel, Marx, Freud, Weber and Lukacs, and focusing on the study and criticism of culture developed from the thought of Freud.

The purpose of the Satanic Frankfurt School was again to control humanity away from their evolutionary potential by degenerating and taking the heart of society, depressing, and making gloomy through Satanic Jacobin, Satanic Bolshevik and Satanic Feminist equality and fraternity Socialism, Communism, and Social Justice Warriors, and Adorno Music and Architecture, "to suicide by".

The Satanic Frankfurt School’s most well-known proponents included Max Horkheimer, media theorist Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Walter Benjamin and Jurgen Habermas. Dr. Kurt Lewin, the founder of the study of “group dynamics,” was a member of the Satanic Frankfurt school in America, and an important influence on the work of the Satanic Tavistock.

In producing their critical theory, the Satanic Frankfurt School brought together the dialectical versions of history of Hegel and Marx. They were deeply influenced by Hegel's idealism and dialectical interpretation of history, and derived a sense of the power of Spirit (Geist) or of cultural forms in human cultural life.

From Marx they derived a sense of the importance of material forces in history and the role of economics in human and social life. They were also heavily influenced by Nietzsche, particularly his critiques of mass culture, society, morality and the state, which in Thus Spake Zarathustra, he had denounced the new idol, a new object of worship.

Nietzsche also criticized "mass man" and conformity, and was one of the first critics of the role of journalism in creating mass opinion. The Satanic Frankfurt School agreed with Nietzsche that a lot of the common cultural forms repressed natural instincts, and therefore tried to develop a Godless philosophy that would lead to the supposed emancipation of the human being in society but instead bring Hell on Earth.

The Satanic Frankfurt School recognized that modern consumer society was the new form of capitalism, creating novel forms of social institutions that integrated the working class into advanced capitalist systems. Important, therefore, was their attempt to update traditional Marxist interpretation by analyzing the role of what they recognized as state and monopoly capitalism.

While, beginning in the late nineteenth century, a new era of monopoly capitalism had arrived, additionally, with the Great Depression the state began to play a much more important role in managing the economy, resulting in the new model of state capitalism exemplified by the New Deal.

There were two forms of state monopoly capitalism: there was the fascist and authoritarian state capitalism of Nazi Germany and the democratic state capitalism of the United States. In both of these forms of state capitalism, new types of administration, bureaucracy and methods of social domination emerged that contributed, they believed, to a curtailing of individual freedom and democracy, giving rise to conformity and massification.

In particularly, the Satanic Frankfurt School explored the role of the mass media. Where control of mass media was overt in Nazi Germany, and similarly in the Soviet Union, the Satanic Frankfurt School saw that the instruments of mass culture and communication were playing an equally important role in marketing capitalism, democracy and the American way of life.

The members of the Satanic Frankfurt School were, for the most part, from assimilated Satanic Jewish families. And it would seem, due to their secularism, despite retaining a Jewish identity, as well as their cohesiveness and theories promoting a reinterpretation of traditional morality, particularly sexual morality, that they must have been of Sabbatean Frankist origin

Sexual Excess as a Religion

We are told "free love" is "progressive and modern." In fact, like Satanism the Sabbatean sect has indulged in Sexual Rituals including wife sharing, sex orgies, adultery and incest - increasing sexual addiction leading on to homosexuality, torture, drugs, pedophilia, bestiality, and pornography for more than 350 years.

They have inducted us into their cult.

Antelman cites the proceedings of a rabbinical court where Shmuel, son of Shlomo tearfully confessed he had rejected the Torah and had encouraged his wife to have sex several times with Hershel. "I am guilty. She did not want to." (111)

Jacob Frank pimped his beautiful wife to recruit influential men.


Pimping and blackmailing as an entry into Satanic organisations. In order to be trusted by a Satanist one must pedophile then ritually torture, Murder, Sacrifice babies, children and people on video! in the underground dungeons all over the Planet.

Otherwise you get Epsteined!

Pimping and blackmailing Epstein as well as donating to Harvard and MIT eugenic, mind control, scientists for, on behalf of, transhumanist Eugenicists Bill Gates and the "usual suspect" family foundations was a blackmailer, "they owe me favours" of many elite people - heads of Google, Microsoft and Facebook - as well as Bill Gates








Freud's reported interest in the Lurianic Kabbalah is explored from both theoretical and psychotherapeutic points of view. The Lurianic symbols are understood both as important historical antecedents to psychoanalysis and as a significant source of both insight and inspiration for contemporary psychotherapists.

Sigmund Freud and Rabbi Bloch

David Bakan, in the paperback edition of his work, Sigmund Freud and The Jewish Mystical Tradition relates a story which, I believe, bears repeating. It's a fascinating story. I'm not sure if it's true, but even as an apocryphal tale it should command our attention. The story involves two rabbis by the name of Chayyim, two rabbis by the name of Bloch, Bakan, and Sigmund Freud.

In his book, first published in the 1950s, Bakan had argued that Freud had either consciously or unconsciously made use of Jewish mystical ideas in formulating psychoanalysis [1]. After the book's publication Bakan received a letter from a Rabbi Chayyim Bloch, who had been an acquaintance of Freud some years back. Bloch had read Bakan's book and informed Bakan that he had some information that might be of interest to him.

According to Bloch, many years earlier he had been asked by his own mentor, the eminent Rabbi Joseph Bloch, to do a German translation of the works of Chayyim Vital, a 16th century rabbi who had been the most important student of Isaac Luria, the great master of the theosophical Kabbalah [2]. Bloch told Bakan that he'd begun work on the translation but soon lost interest and ceased work altogether when Joseph Bloch died in 1923. Sometime later, however, Chayyim Bloch had a dream in which Joseph Bloch came to him and asked him why he had not finished the project.

Chayyim Bloch then completed the translation but felt he needed someone to write a forward to the book and to help assume responsibility for its publication.

Apparently Bloch had some understanding of the psychological significance of Chayyim Vital's work, because he decided to approach his acquaintance, Sigmund Freud. Freud agreed to read the manuscript, and upon doing so exclaimed to Bloch "This is gold!" and wondered aloud why Chayyim Vital's work had never been brought to his attention in the past. Freud agreed to write the forward to the book and also agreed to assist in securing its publication.

At this point, Freud informed Bloch that he too had written a book that was relevant to Judaism, and hurriedly presented Bloch with the manuscript of what was to become Moses and Monotheism. Freud and Bloch were meeting in Freud's library, and Bloch quickly perused Freud's manuscript. The work, however, incensed Bloch, who, saw that Freud had not only denied that Moses was Jewish but had placed responsibility for Moses' death on the Jewish people. Bloch exclaimed that the Christian world had always blamed the Jews for the death of their Christ, and now Freud would blame the Jews for the death of their own liberator, Moses.

Freud himself was deeply angered by Bloch's reaction and left the room, leaving Bloch alone in Freud's library for a period of time. During that time Bloch reports that he had nothing to do but to browse through the books on Freud's shelf, amongst which was a French translation of the classical Kabbalistic text, the Zohar, as well as several German language books on Jewish mysticism [1].

What we might ask, was the gold that Freud had seen in the pages of Bloch's translation of Chayyim Vital's work? Interestingly, and somewhat surprisingly, David Bakan in his own book on Freud and Jewish mysticism work barely even mentions Vital or Luria. This is the case even though it should be plain to anyone familiar with the Lurianic Kabbalah that it is a system of thought which is far more dynamic and, I would daresay, far more psychoanalytic, than any other aspect of the Jewish tradition.

Vital and Luria

Chayyim Vital (1542-1620) was 20 years younger than Isaac Luria and outlived him by 50 years, but during the period of time when the two of them were together in Safed, Vital acted as Luria's Boswell, taking down his words as if they were the words of a prophet. Indeed, Luria was one of the greatest Kabbalistic masters, who taught his mystical and theosophical doctrine to a few select pupils in one of Judaism's four holy cities.

Those who have had an opportunity to visit Safed in modern day Israel cannot fail to be impressed. Perched above the Galilee it is a tranquil and remote site of ancient synagogues and mosaics. Luria himself was a poet whose odes to the Sabbath adorn even today's Jewish prayer books. On Friday nights he would lead his followers in spirited song greeting the "Sabbath Queen" outdoors as the sun set on the horizon of Palestine.

Luria's ideas were little known outside orthodox Jewish circles, however, until Gershom Scholem brought them to the attention of western intellectuals in the 1930s and 40s [3,4,5]. Since that time, Scholem, a number of his students, and others have catalogued and commented upon the works of Luria's disciples including Vital [6].

Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that even Carl Jung, who himself professed more than a passing interest in the Kabbalah, and whose works are filled with references to Kabbalistic ideas, reports that he only became aware of the Lurianic Kabbalah in 1954. Judging from Jung's letters it is fair to say that he himself found gold in Luria's ideas, commenting in particular that he was impressed by Luria's notion that it is man's divinely appointed task to help restore the broken vessels of a shattered cosmos [7]. Several years later Jung commented that "a full understanding of the Jewish origins of psychoanalysis would carry us beyond Jewish Orthodoxy into the subterranean workings of Hasidism and then into the intricacies of the Kabbalah which still remain unexplored psychologically" [8].

The Lurianic Kabbalah

The Lurianic Kabbalah is a relatively late development in Jewish mysticism. The locus classicus of the Kabbalah, is, of course, the Zohar which contemporary scholars date to the 13th century but which Jewish Orthodoxy insists goes back to the 2nd century and was authored by the rabbinic sage, Simeon Bar Yohai [9]. Many of the ideas in the Lurianic Kabbalah are dynamic developments of concepts and symbols that appear in the Zohar. One can also find many ancient Gnostic themes reappearing suddenly in the Lurianists, and the study of both Christian and Jewish Gnostic sources is invaluable as a background to the ideas of the Kabbalah [10,11,12].

Lurianic ideas are also prominent in the 17th century messianic movement surrounding Sabbatei Zevi in Poland [5]. They are also to be found amongst the Lubavitch Hasidim, whose psychological interpretation of the Kabbalah is invaluable for our own contemporary understanding of this tradition [13].

Those who wish to pursue a more detailed study of the Kabbalah are referred to the works described under "Books" in this website, as well as to the valuable works by Gershom Scholem and Isaiah Tishby[4,5,6,9]. The latter's recent compilation and translation of the Zohar is unparalleled, finally making this work truly accessible to the English speaking public.

Unfortunately, few of the works of Chayyim Vital have as yet been translated into English. His Sefer Etz Chayyim, the first Gate of which has recently been translated into English [2], is extremely complex and requires a detailed familiarity with the specialized Kabbalistic terminology.

There is also a Christian Kabbalah, a 19th century example of which is the esoteric Holy Kabbalah of Waite [14]. The 17th century Latin writings of the Christian Kabbalist, Knorr Von Rosenroth, were relied upon by Jung in his interpretation of alchemy [15,16]. The Kabbalah also echoes and is echoed by many of the themes in Plato and Neoplatonism, Christian mysticism, German Idealism (particularly in Schelling and Hegel); and, interestingly, both in Hindu and Buddhist thought. A full contemporary understanding of the Kabbalah would indeed take into consideration these and many other mystical, theological and philosophical movements. (These ideas are the subject of Kabbalistic Metaphors: Jewish Mystical Themes In Ancient and Modern Thought.)

The Kabbalah is , as I have just intimated, a subtext to Jung's prolific work on alchemy. This is because the alchemists themselves were greatly influenced by, and implemented, Kabbalistic ideas in their work. Indeed it can be argued that Jung's spiritual and psychological reinterpretation of alchemy is nothing more than a return to alchemy's Kabbalistic roots.

(See Jung and Kabballah link on this website.)

Judaism and Psychoanalysis

There have, of course, been numerous works which treat of the presumed Jewish pedigree to psychoanalysis [1,17,18]. With the exception of Bakan none of them deal specifically with Jewish mysticism and most understand Freud's Judaism as a kind of general impetus to his work in psychoanalysis. Rice, for example, has argued that the social position of the Jew as an outsider enabled Freud to make a breakthrough in an otherwise conservative scientific climate [17]. Gay, in his book Freud: A Godless Jew, argues that it was not Freud's Judaism but rather his godlessness, his atheism, which enabled him to make the discoveries leading to psychoanalysis [18]. Gay comments that all of the comparisons between, for example, the methods of dream interpretation in the Talmud and psychoanalysis are superficial and coincidental, and that there is no real theoretical thread that can link psychoanalysis with any specific Jewish or other religious phenomenon.

Unlike Bakan, I am not of the firm opinion that Freud consciously or unconsciously borrowed Kabbalistic or Jewish themes in creating psychoanalysis; this may or may not be the case. What is more interesting, however, is the light that can be shed both on psychoanalysis and Jewish mysticism through a dialog between them. It is nevertheless significant that Gay, neither in his work on Freud's Judaism nor in his major biography of Freud [19], takes any cognizance of the Lurianic Kabbalah and its potential relevance to psychoanalytic thought. The same is true for each of the other authors who have written about the impact of Judaism on psychoanalysis. However, if there is a specific convincing relationship between Jewish mysticism and psychoanalysis it is to be found in the work of Luria and Vital, the very work which Freud himself presumably declared to be gold.

The Lurianic Metaphors

The Lurianic Kabbalah is extremely complex. However, in basic outline it can be understood as a grand myth or metaphor about the origin and destiny of the universe [20,21]. According to Luria the creation of the universe is the manifestation of a cosmic drama involving the emanation, channeling, structuring, and containment of God's infinite energy or light. This light is referred to as Or Ein Sof, and is conceived of by Luria in sexual terms, as divine sexual energy.

According to Luria, the original creation process, involved a contraction, withdrawal and concealment of God's infinite presence. This act is known in the Lurianic Kabbalah as Tzimtzum, a notion which expresses the view that creation is essentially a negative, rather than a positive act. The Tzimtzum resulted in a void within which a finite world could be created. The initial act of creation involved a process which might be described as being analogous to the creation of a detailed scene by interposing obstructions (e.g. a series of "negatives" in an otherwise uniform plenum of light. In this manner, God is said to have emanated a series of ten archetypal structures known as the Sefirot, which are understood as crystallized representations of God's intellectual, spiritual and emotional characteristics.

The Sefirot were meant to become vessels for the further emanation of God's creative energy. But because they were disjoint, they were not strong enough to contain the light of the Infinite and a majority of them shattered, causing a portion of the Infinite's light to cling to and become entrapped within the broken shards which were then dispersed throughout the world. The resulting pieces, known in Hebrew as Kellipot (nutshells or husks) become in the Lurianic system the metaphysical source of all that is dark, negative, alienated and evil. These Kellipot are said to have exiled a portion of God's infinite light from its source and to have thus given rise to an alienated, evil realm, the Sitra Achra, what the Kabbalists call the "Other Side."

At the same time, the Breaking of the Bessels is said to have resulted in a disruption of the flow of divine procreative energy throughout the cosmos, and, particularly, in a disturbance in the normal conjugal relations between the masculine and feminine aspects of the godhead. As a result, much of the divine sexual energy was entrapped in the "husks" of the "Other Side". It is mankind's divinely appointed task, through proper ethical, spiritual and psychological conduct to discover the kellipot as they manifest themselves in our world, and to free or raise the sparks of light within them (known in Hebrew as Netzotzim), in order that they may return to their proper place as forces serving the divine will. In so doing, mankind is said to liberate the "feminine waters" necessary for the renewed sexual union within God.

The act of liberating the divine light or energy and restoring it to the service of the infinite God is known in the Lurianic literature as Tikkun ha-Olam, the restoration of the world. On a personal level, each individual is enjoined to liberate the sparks within his own soul in order that he may ultimately achieve his personal restoration and divine destiny.

The Kabbalists themselves recognize this cosmic drama, to be a metaphor for deeper theological and also psychological events, and if we examine this metaphor from a contemporary psychological perspective we discover it to be strikingly psychoanalytic in nature. Indeed, the metaphors of psychoanalysis and the Kabbalah are so similar that if it were not for the fact that the Lurianic Kabbalah antedated Freud by 300 years we would be tempted to call the entire scheme a "psychoanalysis of God".

Luria and Freud

According to Freud, the development of the individual involves the channeling of procreative energy, which is itself modified into structures, the ego and superego, whose function it is to channel and modulate further emanations of the individual's libido, much as the Sefirot were designed as vessels for channeling the light and energy of God's light, energy and will. For reasons which are inherent in the structure of the conflict between instinct and culture these structures (the ego and the superego) are not consistently able to maintain and modulate the libidinous energy in ways that are most adaptive to the individual. There is, one might say, a partial shattering of each of these structures, which results in a splitting off or alienation of ideas and emotions from the main fabric of the individual's personality, just as, in the Lurianic system, divine sparks are separated or exiled from their main source in God.

This psychological splitting off occurs, for example, when the individual becomes aware of an impulse, thought, or desire which his conscious self finds unacceptable. The impulse or idea, and its associated affect, is repressed and subsequently exists in a nether psychological realm known as the unconscious, which is quite analogous to Luria's sitra achra or "other side".

Once in the unconscious these complexes of thought and affect, which are akin to the Kabbalist's Kellipot, are inaccessible to the individual. They are, in a sense, exiled psychosexual energy which becomes a source of all manner and variety of psychological mischief which the individual experiences as depression or other neurotic symptoms, in the same way as the Kellipot entrap the divine sexuality and become the source of negativity and evil on a cosmic level.

The job of the analyst is to make these unconscious complexes conscious and, more importantly, to free the libidinal energy attached to them so that it can again be made available to the individual for his life goals; just as in Kabbalah the energy trapped in the sitra achra must be freed and made available for the service of God.

From a kabbalistic perspective, the psychoanalytic endeavor is itself a form of Tikkun or restoration, which brings an end to a galut or exile of aspects of the individual's personality, and ushers in a geulah or psychological redemption.

Philosophy, Kabbalah and Psychoanalysis

We might be tempted, at this juncture, to look upon the Lurianic Kabbalah in the same way that Jung looked upon alchemy, that is, as a dimly understood projection of the Kabbalists' own psychological processes onto the cosmos as a whole. Indeed, the Hasidim understood the Lurianic Kabbalah in essentially this way. On their view the human mind, the microcosm, perfectly mirrors the divine mind or macrocosm, and the events which the Kabbalah had described as cosmic events were understood by the Hasidim as transpiring within the individual's own psyche or soul. While I believe that this is a fruitful approach, it is not the only one, and a reverse perspective, one which raises the application of psychoanalytic concepts to the cosmos as a whole, may be fruitful as well.

Such a perspective will be attractive to those who refuse to draw sharp distinctions between psychology, philosophy, and theology, and who hold, as did the Kabbalists, that our deepest psychological insights can also satisfy many of our philosophical and theological urgings as well. My experience is that many individuals who are attracted to psychoanalysis (as opposed, for example, to behavioral or cognitive psychology) hold just such a view, and, in spite of Freud's well known disavowal, regard psychoanalysis as a weltanschauung with profound cultural, political, and philosophical significance.

In this regard, it may be worth our while to compare our own intellectual situation with that of the 19th century in Germany, in the years, immediately prior to the advent of psychoanalysis. At that time, German philosophy had been dominated by the philosophical perspectives of Kant and Hegel. Kant had attempted to answer philosophical skepticism through a constructivist doctrine in which certain presumably universal categories such as space, time and causality were understood as invariant properties of the human mind, but completely inapplicable to the noumenal realm or the "things in themselves".

Hegel had turned Kant on his head, arguing that the very categories of the human mind which Kant had held to be solely applicable to appearances were indeed applicable to the real world. Through an understanding of the dynamic or dialectical relationship amongst these categories, Hegel sought to obtain a synoptic view of the nature, origins and destiny of the cosmos as a whole. Hegel argued that it made no sense to confine the Kantian categories to the psychology of man. Any talk about "things in themselves" which lay behind or which cause our psychological experience, is itself conditioned by that experience, and it simply makes no sense to speak of such a presumably unknowable realm at all.

If we examine the psychologies of both Freud and Jung we discover that both take up a position which is very similar to Kant's, but whereas Kant regarded the categories of the conscious mind as the vehicles through which we construct our world, Freud and Jung argued that such construction is at least in part the result of unconscious mental activities, activities like displacement, condensation, projection, repression and symbolization (and the work of the archetypes in the case of Jung).

I would argue that the psychoanalysis of Freud and Jung has yet to find its 20th or 21st century version of Hegel, one who would systematically draw the full philosophical and theological implications of the theory of the unconscious, and who would acknowledge what Hegel, if he were alive today, would have readily seen, but which Freud and Jung refused to consider, that our experience, concepts, and language regarding the God archetype, are all we can ever mean with the word "God", and that the depths of our own souls are the only conceivable windows we have into the depths of the absolute.

Psychoanalysis strikes us as deep and profound precisely because its categories grant us insight not only into personal minds but (as the Kabbalists, in speaking of analogous ideas, intimated) into the nature of the cosmos as a whole. As James Hillman has affirmed, when we do psychoanalytic work we are not simply talking about 'you and I' but have an opportunity to enter into the soul of the world as well [22,23].

As psychotherapists I believe we can find something of considerable psychological interest in each of the Kabbalistic symbols, in each phase of their mythical account of the origin and destiny of the world. Consider, for example, the kabbalistic theme of exile and redemption, a theme which is not only prominent throughout Jewish history but which appears to be universal in our own time. That man is somehow exiled from himself is an assumption which not only pervades psychoanalytic interpretations of contemporary man but also existentialist and Marxist interpretations as well. That Freud himself identified with the Jewish theme of exile and redemption is made clear by his long-standing preoccupation with the liberator of the Jewish people, Moses. That analysis offers deliverance from man's self-alienated condition has led some to regard psychoanalysis as a redemptive movement in the tradition of Judaism [17].

Or consider the Kabbalistic notion of Ein-sof, the term they used to denote the infinite unknowable God, the source of all energy, will and interest in both humanity and the world. Ein-sof has its analog in the notion of a primal unknowable unconscious, what Jacques Lacan sometimes refers to as the "Real," that ineffable, at times traumatic source of desire that lies outside of the symbolic order and about which we therefore cannot speak.

Tzimtzum, the withdrawal concealment and contraction, by which the Infinite is said by the Kabbalists to have created the world, has many psychological ramifications which I will discuss momentarily. The same, we shall see, can readily be said about the Sefirot, the structures, dimensions or archetypes which are the building blocks of the cosmos and human personality, the Shevirat ha-Kelim, the Breaking of the Vessels, the necessary destructive process which is part of all creativity, and Tikkun ha-Olam, the process by which man raises the sparks of divine light which have been trapped in the "Other Side."

Tzimtzum: "Contraction and Concealment"

We can begin with the Lurianic notion of Tzimtzum. This idea, which is unique in the history of religion and philosophy, involves the notion that creation is essentially a negative as opposed to a positive act. The Infinite God must withdraw, conceal, contract himself and, in effect, get himself out of the way in order to create, and ultimately reach out to a world. Without getting into the logical details of this doctrine I should note that the Kabbalists speak as if the very act of contraction involved in the Tzimtzum is enough to allow a world (and particularly a Primordial Man, who embodies all of the characteristics of the universe) to emerge.

The Hasidim interpreted this doctrine psychologically in their admonition that in relating to others, in particular our children, we must emulate the Infinite God and perform an act of tzimtzum whereby our own thoughts and desires, are contracted and concealed so that the other may emerge in his or her own individuality.

Rotenberg, has created an entire social psychology based on the notion of Tzimtzum, arguing that mutual I-Thou relationships and communal institutions must be based upon mutual contraction rather than the assertion which is taught by contemporary psychology [24].

I have often found that the most difficult task for a new psychotherapist is that of getting him or herself out of the way in order that the patient may emerge as an individual in his own right. Indeed, the psychotherapeutic relationship may be the one relationship in which patients can experience an other who is not asserting his or her will over against the patient's own. If this can truly be achieved, then perhaps the patient can emerge spontaneously in his or her own full being in much the same way as the Lurianic Kabbalists held that the Primordial Man emerged spontaneously with the tzimtzum or contraction and concealment of God.

This is an attitude, it should be noted, which is even more difficult to take with respect to family members and others with whom we are close, who we may be inclined to see as narcissistic extensions of ourselves. However, it is only through an act of contraction in which we overcome our own narcissism that we are able to see others in the context of their own desire.

How is such an act of Tzimtzum with respect to others possible? I do not have an easy answer to this question. but a few words and metaphors come to mind. Amongst these are becoming transparent as opposed opaque, naive instead of knowledgeable, and perhaps even foolish instead of wise. I think that those of us, for example, who conduct psychotherapy, and who are unable to allow ourselves to be fooled, manipulated or completely baffled by our patients have not reached the requisite state of humility to conduct meaningful psychotherapy.

It is, I believe, of interest in this context, that in the writings of Chayyim Vital we learn that before God could contract Himself away from a point He first had to concentrate all of his energies upon it. This provides us with the insight that the very process of "contracting" with respect to others is not simply one of ignoring them or leaving them to their own devices, but rather involves an intense focus and interest upon them, and at the same time a restraint or withdrawal which allows them to emerge as themselves.

None of this is to say that there is no place for assertion, wisdom and knowledge, on the part of a therapist, teacher, parent or friend. The Lurianic Kabbalists recognized that the negative act of Tzimtzum must be followed by a positive act of hitpashut or emanation, and that the relationship between God and the world, or between man and man, is an ebb and flow of contraction and expansion, withdrawal and assertion, retreat and encounter. In psychotherapy, however, there must first be a getting out of the patient's way before one can achieve the requisite understanding to make a useful interpretation. When the analytic hour is filled with the patient and his or her desire as opposed to the therapist's, then what, if anything, must be said will become quite evident, for the analyst will have succeeded in identifying himself as completely as possible with the feelings, thoughts and situation of the analysand. I believe that it is just such a contracted, naive kind of listening that enables a Hasidic rebbe to give such profound advice to his Hasidim, for such advice turns out to be simply a tracking or reflection of the Hasid's own desire.

An act of Tzimtzum is also required on the part of the analysand. The patient, in regressing to critical moments in his early life, by becoming absorbed in the world of his fantasies and dreams, and by taking a curious and naive interest in his own mental productions, performs an act of contraction or withdrawal with respect to his own ego or self.

The dream is of particular interest in this regard. The Kabbalah (like the Vedanta) regarded the whole of creation as akin to a dream in the infinite mind of the Absolute. In withdrawing himself from himself and (what amounts to the same thing) by concealing himself from his own reality, the infinite God creates an illusion of finitude and multiplicity which is our world. Interestingly, this illusion is for the Kabbalists the very perfection and completion of the deity himself, for without man existing in a finite world, God would have no capacity to see or comprehend himself or to instantiate the values which are implicit in his infinite goodness.

We each perform an act of Tzimtzum and, in effect, play God to dream worlds of our own creation each night. In dreaming we perform an act of contraction whereby we withdraw or remove our cathexis from the world and substitute a new world or reality in the dream. But, paradoxically, just as the world is said to complete God, our dreams can be said to complete ourselves, for it is only through our dreams and fantasies that we can achieve a perspicacious notion of who we really are. Jung who was far more theologically inclined than Freud, viewed the dream as our portal into "heaven", for in the dream we gain access to the archetypes which, according to Jung, are the psychological foundation for what were traditionally spoken of as the gods.

As I have already mentioned, the word Tzimtzum has a connotation of concealment as well as contraction, and it is this connotation which is of particular relevance to an aspect of human creativity which has been much discussed in psychoanalysis: the origin of personality or character.. We might say that an act of Tzimtzum or concealment lies at the very core of our character, for it is only through concealment and it's variants, i.e.: denial, repression, symbolization, displacement, condensation, etc. that a division is set up between the conscious and the unconscious mind and our personalities are born.

It has often been stated that the unconscious mind both adds depth and flavor to life, and is essential to the formation of an individual's character. Just as God, according to the Kabbalists, creates a world through an act of concealment (if you will a cosmic repression) man creates his own character, and, as Freud understood it, his culture, through an earthly concealment: the repressions of everyday life. We can see a Hegelian dialectic at work on both the theological and psychological levels, for in both instances we find that reality gives rise to illusions which are in turn productive of the very realities which gave rise to them. The "illusion" of a finite world is theologically the perfection and completion of God, and the "illusion" of a world of fantasies and dreams is the ground and the depths of the reality of man. This, by the way, is a wonderful example of the Kabbalistic notion of coincidentia oppositorum, the principle that profound opposites compliment and complete each other. It also illustrates the Kabbalistic (and psychoanalytic) principle that the unknown (or unconscious) is not simply an empirical or contingent matter that could be reversed, but rather lies at the core of man's very being.

There is one more clinical theme that I would like to pursue with respect to the concept of Tzimtzum, and this relates to the problem of getting ourselves and even our psychologies out of the way so that we as individuals can make room for an external world. Since the time of Copernicus man has become decentered within the physical universe while at the same time becoming far more essential in the spiritual world. Man has become spiritually central to such a degree that he himself has become completely coextensive with "soul"[23, p. 100].

The world itself has lost its soul and the hermeneutic method which was once used to find spiritual meaning in nature and cosmos has now been confined to the study of man. Indeed, one of Freud's greatest innovations, perhaps his greatest, was that at a time when Darwin had subjected an aspect of the world (the origin and nature of biological species) which had once been understood hermeneutically, to the methods of natural science, Freud subjected a phenomenon (neurosis and psychopathology), which in his day had been understood scientifically, to the methods of textual interpretation, the very methods, by the way, which formed the basis of the Jewish intellectual tradition.

However, a consequence of these Darwinian and Freudian developments has been a further bifurcation between man and the world, between the humanities and the natural sciences; to the point where the soul has been taken out of the world and confined to man. James Hillman, has spent the past 30 years bemoaning this occurrence, urging us to regard the world itself as well as our own productions in art, language, and science as filled with soul and spirit [22,23]. We have boxed ourselves into such a corner that the psyche is confined to ourselves and our relationships, and we are no longer as capable as previous generations of sensing the great depth and soul in the world at large.

Indeed, our generation is one in which to be deep means to turn inward toward the self, and to be involved in such matters as politics, science or the natural world is deemed psychologically uninteresting. Many of the most creative minds of our own time have spent the better part of their lives in self absorption on the analytic couch or in other primarily psychological activities. As such, we are in a position that is in some ways analogous to that of God before creation: we are narcissistically preoccupied and unable to get ourselves out of the way so that we may genuinely encounter an ensouled world.

Perhaps another human act of contraction or Tzimtzum is necessary at this stage to recognize that the hermeneutic categories which we have eagerly applied in psychoanalysis to ourselves are relevant to the world at large, and that there is as much psyche and depth in that world as there is within our own souls. When my patients take a genuinely deep and abiding interest in the world around them and turn away from their own inner preoccupations I consider this a most hopeful sign. While such an interest can, on occasion, be a sign of resistance, it is very frequently also a sign that the patient has contracted himself, that, he has gotten himself out of the way to such an extent that he has permitted a world to emerge outside the confines of his own psyche. Achieving this might be considered a wonderful act of imitatio dei, and when it occurs the Kabbalists would find it as a warrant for the assertion that man was created in the image of God.

One more word on the function of the world in both the Kabbalah and in psychoanalysis. We know that according to Freud, each of us has a thanatic urge to return to the complete state of entropy, disorganization, or nothingness from which we arose. This is what I have elsewhere referred to as Freud's negative mysticism: a mysticism in which the goal, instead of being a union with the one resplendent God, is dissolution or death [25]. According to Freud, our attachment to the objects of the world prevents us from acting out on our thanatic urges.

A similar theory is found in the Baal Shem Tov, the founder of Hasidism, who held that our interest in the objects of the material world is the one thing that prevents our soul from prematurely returning to its origins in God. I would say then that for both Freud and the Baal Shem that the world is a good thing, for Freud because it forestalls our entry into nothingness, and for the Baal Shem Tov because it prevents a premature unio mystico that would prevent us from accomplishing our work on earth. The world is also, according to the Kabbalists, in spite of its immense challenges, evils, and hardships, or (to be more precise) because of them, the perfect setting in which man can assume his life task. What this task is, according to the Kabbalists, will be our concern later, when we turn to the concept of Tikkun ha-Olam.

The Sefirot

Sefirah and its plural form Sefirot have no clear linguistic derivation. The term has been variously interpreted as relating to Hebrew words meaning luminary, brilliance or sapphire, number, scribe and book (the familiar Hebrew word for which is sefer) and each of these proposed derivations can provide us with some insight into the nature of the sefirot symbol. The Kabbalists indeed describe the Sefirot as luminaries, dimensions, numbers or archetypes with which God has created or written the world. The Sefirot are ten in number, and even their names (e.g. Wisdom, Kindness, Beauty) suggest that they represent values, archetypes or dimensions of both the human soul and (according to the Kabbalists) the world. As we have seen, it is a fundamental tenet of kabbalistic thought that the microcosm mirrors the macro-cosm, that the elements of the soul of man mirror the ultimate constituents of God and the universe. As we have already seen, these elements or Sefirot are in a sense illusory in nature, having been brought into existence by the Tzimtzum or concealment of the infinite unity of God, in much the same way as a multiplicity of mathematical equivalencies can appear to have a separate existence as a result of our ignorance of the fact that they are all, for example, equal to the number one.

The Sefirot refer to such dimensions of existence as the ultimate will, ideal wisdom, and deepest understanding, as well as, love, power, and judgment, beauty and compassion, endurance, majesty, foundation, and kingship. These dimensions have been interpreted by the Kabbalists as instantiating the spiritual, psychological, and material dimensions of the known world. Beyond the four dimensions of space and time which are recognized by contemporary physics, the Kabbalists recognize six value and ideational dimensions which characterize an object's spiritual, conceptual, psychological, and physical properties. Moses Cordovero, a kabbalist who was a contemporary of Luria's in Safed, understood the Sefirot as the constituent elements or "molecules" of the objects in the world, and held that each thing obtained its specific character through the relative admixture and dominance of Sefirot which comprised it. The Kabbalists also held that the Sefirot were organized into worlds, some of which (being spiritual) were dominated by such sefirot as Will and Wisdom while others (being more material) were dominated by less exalted sefiriotic archetypes. An interesting and important aspect of the Sefirot doctrine is the existence of the so-called ten negative crowns or "counter Sefirot", which are said to exist in an infernal realm, providing an evil or negative counterpart to the Sefirot which dominate the upper worlds. According to the Kabbalists man must pay his due to the world of the counter Sefirot as well as to the upper realms. If he fails to recognize the negative forms of will, wisdom, strength and kindness within himself, he runs the risk of being dominated by these same forces emerging from the "Other Side".

An entire psychology can be developed on the basis of the Sefirot doctrine. Not only can the sefirot be put to fascinating use in the understanding of character, but the kabbalistic doctrine of "Worlds" can be utilized in understanding such phenomenon as higher and lower states of consciousness and dreams. Freud himself well understood that a dream, after all, brings us into a realm which is dominated by dimensions of will and desire, and in which the material aspects of things are subordinated to desires and ideas. Such a realm corresponds very closely to some of the alternative worlds spoken of in the Kabbalah.

Several other aspects of the Sefirot symbolism are striking from a psychoanalytic point of view. For example, the Sefirot are organized in the Zohar into a series of parent and child personalities whose dynamic interactions and family romance are strikingly premonitory of the Oedipus and Elektra complexes. The Zohar describes how the "celestial father" has a particular fondness for his daughter which stirs the jealousy of the "celestial mother". In his love, the Zohar relates, he calls her daughter, but this is not enough for him and he calls her sister. This too is not enough for him and he calls her mother. An enraged supernal mother says to her daughter, "is it a small matter that you have taken away my husband, for all his love is centered on you?" But at the same time the mother is said to favor the son over her husband [9, Vol. 1, p. 299], thus, completing a sort of cosmic Oedipal triangle; a vision of the universe in which the world itself is conditioned by archetypical interest and desire, the very desire which contemporary psychoanalysts have discerned in the psychology of individual man and at the foundation of human society.

There is also a decidedly sexual connotation to the Sefirot. The Sefirot are spoken of in metaphors of sexual intercourse and love, and the Kabbalists affirmed that the harmony of all the worlds is dependent upon a sexual arousal and unification which occurs between the celestial beings (Partzufim) which emerge as elements of the sefirotic system. Of course, the division of the godhead into a multiplicity of sefirot and further into several Partzufim or personalities is, according to the Kabbalists, one of those paradoxically necessary real illusions, and the division amongst these entities and personas is a state of affairs which must ultimately be overcome. The unification of the Sefirot is spoken of as zivvug or copulation between male and female aspects of the godhead, and in order for an appropriate unification to take place mutual male and female orgasms are deemed necessary. The "male waters" are derived from the grace of the heavens above, but, as we have seen, the "female waters" are to be supplied by mankind itself, who is often identified in the Kabbalah with the feminine aspect of the deity.

While the Kabbalists warned against taking these sexual metaphors literally, it is clear that theirs is a highly eroticized universe, the dynamics of which are most perfectly expressed in the unification of man and woman in erotic love. That such erotic love is important for the psychological unity of individual man and woman is a plain inference from the Kabbalist’s cosmological theories. A Jungian, of course, is entitled to take the entire scheme of multiple personalities (male, female, young, old etc.) within the godhead as symbolic of the inherent multiplicity within the personality of man, and their various "unifications" as representing the dialectic between "animus" and "anima", and "senex" and "puer" within man's psyche.

The Sefirot are ways in which we as individuals structure our lives and cope with the psychological energy radiating from our own psychic core. The Kabbalists adopted a view in which the perfection of each individual soul involves the full recognition and development of each of seven Sefirot, which they regarded to be the seven basic emotions of the human psyche. Each of these "emotional Sefirot" is said to be comprised of both itself and each of the other six so that a scheme is developed in which there exists, for example, the love of love, the strength of love, the beauty of love, the endurance of love, etc. All forty-nine combinations are necessary in order to achieve the full human potential.

There is also a dialectical relationship amongst a number of the Sefirot. One such relationship, in particular, that between Chesed (love or kindness) and Din (strength or judgment), forms a critical moment in kabbalistic psychology. It is only when love is modified by judgment, and judgment modified by love, resulting in the Sefirah Rachamim (compassion), that the human soul can be said to be complete. Indeed, it is a severing of judgment from love which is said to give rise to the "other side" and the infernal realm of the Kellipot; this providing an analogy to the Freudian notion that repression and neurosis results when the harsh judgments of the super ego are unmodified by erotic or compassionate trends within the personality. Psychotherapeutically, the Kabbalists, and particularly the Hasidim who succeeded them, sought to obtain a balance between kindness and judgment, such that neither dominates and overwhelms the psyche. This balance is expressed in the Sefirah Rachamim, which connotes "compassion". Those who are familiar with the Yiddish word rachmones will understand that it is precisely the deeply felt empathy and compassion expressed by this term that is critical to the psychotherapeutic attitude.

I should note, if only in passing, that the Hasidim developed a sefirotic psychology which antedates Freud by more than 150 years, but which anticipates many of the elements of psychoanalysis, including the view that the psychology of the average man is characterized by extreme inner conflict, that such conflict can be partially ameliorated only through the sublimation of emotions in creative activity, and that one can only ascend psychologically by first descending into the rejected aspects of one's soul [25]. The psychological theories of the Lubavitcher or Chabad Hasidim, who take their name from the first three spiritual and intellectual Sefirot, Chochmah, Binah, and Da'at, (Knowledge, Wisdom and Understanding) is a subject of considerable interest in itself, one, by the way, which can be studied in vivo even today in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn where the Lubavitcher Hasidim have their world headquarters. I think it is fair to say that these and other contemporary Hasidim are in some ways a living representative of the Kabbalah.

The "Breaking of the Vessels"

The Sefirot, we should recall, are spoken of by the Kabbalists as kelim or vessels which are designed to structure the light or energy of the Infinite God. Interestingly, these vessels are composed of the very energy which they are meant to contain. However, as a result of their disunification, of their failure to allow their energy to pass freely between them, the sefirot were unable to contain the immensity of the "cosmic libido." As a result many of the Sefirot shattered, resulting in the metaphysical and psychological event known in the Lurianic writings as the Shevirat ha-Kelim, the Breaking of the Vessels. With the advent of the shevirah, or “breakage” the harmony of the cosmos is destroyed. According to Vital, as a result of the Breaking of the Vessels the “Celestial Mother and Father,” who had hitherto existed “face to face” in coniunctio, turn their backs on each other and the divine energy, embodied in the Sefirot, becomes entrapped in “the Other Side” [2,21].

The "shevirah" is regarded as an event which occurs in every sphere of human and cosmic activity and which inevitably repeats itself in each historical age and in the life of each individual. The breaking of the vessels is perhaps the most important Lurianic symbol. It is a second symbol of negation (tzimtzum being the first) and it teaches us that there is a destructive aspect to all creativity. Old structures must, in effect, be shattered before new ones can be reorganized to transcend them.

This principle holds true for the history and development of nations, for transitions in the history of science and ideas, for the ontogenetic development of human cognitive capacities, and, most significantly for our purposes, for the personal growth of the men and women who we psychotherapists encounter in the consulting room. The cognitive, ethical and spiritual structures which contained our own psychic energies at age 19 or 21 may be totally insufficient to contain them at 25 or 30 and those same containers which worked well for us in our 30s may not work well at all in the 40s, 50s and beyond. While many will be able to make gradual modifications in their personal sefirot, others will experience what can only be described as a tectonic upheaval in their lives when old forms of thinking, feeling, and behaving shatter in the face of new life experiences. This is not such a bad thing, and, as James Hillman has pointed out, as therapists we should not always be in the business of preventing our patients from falling apart [22].

Sometimes the Breaking of the Vessels which occurs in our personal lives is an entree into the deepening of the self and soul. When the structures shatter, a bit of genuine desire, or a glimpse of what Winnicott speaks of as the "true self" is visible through the cracks. Usually, this truth is experienced as a fall into chaos or the unknown, and it might well be analogized to the terrifying dark nights of the soul which for ages have been reported by the mystics and which, on my reading, served as the basis for the initial insights of psychoanalysis. When such a crack becomes visible in the personas of our patients, we have an important decision to make. Do we rush in to close it off and "heal it", or do we decide to ride out the storm and watch as elements of our patient's persona fall in pieces before our therapeutic eyes?

What to do in such situations is, on my view, one of the most difficult decisions a psychotherapist ever has to make, and it is the mark of a sensitive and wise clinician that he or she is able to judge when to withdraw and observe and when to suggest, for example, psychopharmacological treatment in the face an apparent psychological breakdown. When an individual experiences the Breaking of the Vessels, it is, from a psychiatric perspective, a portent of depression, anxiety, or perhaps psychosis. From a theological perspective, however, it is akin to a test from the gods. We must remember that man does not pass all such tests and that sometimes more than a sure and compassionate hand is necessary to assist the patient in emerging from the Breaking of the Vessels to the next stage, which is Tikkun, repair or restoration.

Before moving on, however, I wish to dwell a bit more on the theme of disintegration, in psychotherapy. Why, we might ask, should we ever welcome our patients' falling apart, ever wait out the storm of their pathology with an anticipation of creativity and progress coming in its wake? I have a few thoughts on these questions. The first of these (which I have already intimated) is that psychopathology is very often a clue to desire. A man who finds himself with the impulse to suddenly drive his car into oncoming traffic, or a woman who suddenly stops acting as a wife and mother and secludes herself in the corner of a dark room, may each be registering a protest against a life in which they are not acting from their true desire, or conversely they may be trying to destroy or incapacitate themselves before desires that are unacceptable to them have a chance to show their face.

Pathology is often an indication of that kernel of light which is hidden inside the "husk of darkness" (to use the Lurianic metaphor) and which may not, in fact, become available for extraction or release, unless the pathology is, so to speak, permitted to run its course. The "falling apart" which is pathology can be valuable in other ways as well; it can serve as a humbling experience, and the means for transcending or disintegrating our own narcissism. In breaking up the structures and securities of which we were once so sure, pathology can also lead to moral development as we take a fresh perspective on ourselves and our relationships. Finally, in bringing ourselves face to face with the darkest corners of our experience we become deeper and more complete as individuals. With Jung, I cannot help but feel that the man or woman who has come to recognize the murderer within is somehow more complete as a human being than another whose murderous impulses are unconsciously manifest in biting sarcasm and extreme competitiveness.

The Sefirot have shattered and the broken shards go hurtling through the cosmic void, trapping sparks of divine light which attach themselves to the shards like drops of oil that cling to the pieces of a shattered clay vessel. These sparks, surrounded by the dead shards, comprise, as we have seen, what the Kabbalists refer to as the Sitra Achraor the "Other Side." It is incumbent upon the individual to discover those sparks which are relevant to his own life, to free the divine light contained within them, and, in effect to assemble the vessels in a manner which is superior to the way they were assembled originally by God himself. Theologically speaking, humanity is enjoined to complete and perfect creation. Psychologically speaking, the individual is responsible for the re-formation of his or her own character, and, particularly, for the transcendence of the personality formed by his/her heredity and early life. As James Hillman has pointed out, it is the "falling apart" of psychopathology which provides the opportunity for this transcendence.

There is an analogy to the dynamic of the Breaking of the Vessels in the psychoanalytic interpretation of dreams. We have already seen how, in dreaming, the individual performs a miniature Tzimtzum (concealment, contraction) which enables him or her to withdraw cathexis from the external world and create a new reality which is dominated by will and desire. The dreamwork furthers this process through the use of displacement, substitution, condensation and symbolization which further conceals the inner meaning of the dream from the dreamer. In order for this meaning to be restored the dream itself must, according to Freud, be broken up into its component parts and reorganized in a manner which, in effect, recaptures the original spark of creativity entering into the dream's formation.

The kabbalistic process of Tikkun might be said to be akin to this interpretive process, only on a much wider scale. As a result of the cosmic Tzimtzum or concealment, the world itself is a distortion of the original divine light or essence. This cosmic distortion, like the manifest dream, must itself be broken apart into constituent elements which, having fallen into a nether world akin to the unconscious, will then be restored by the individual through the process of Tikkun in order that he/she may discover and complete the divine essence or purpose. This process is perfectly analogous to the alchemical solve et coagulum, which Jung understood to be the means through which an individual attains wholeness of self [15]. The alchemists, in their quest to create gold from common substances, themselves adopted the Kabbalistic concepts of Shevirah and Tikkun, holding that base elements must first be dissolved or broken apart before being reassembled (with the aid of the philosopher's stone) into gold.

Tikkun: The Restoration

The process of Tikkun was a continuous source of fascination for the Kabbalists who created a far ranging set of symbols to express its essence. We have already encountered several of these symbols in our discussion of the raising of the sparks, the unification of the masculine and feminine aspects of God and the soul, the integration of sefirot, the modification of judgment by kindness and the consequent emergence of Rachamim or compassion, the sublimation of instinct into intellectual and spiritual activity, and the descent into the infernal world of the Kellipot for the purpose of extracting the divine essence and reconciliation with one's true self. Amongst the other similes with which the Kabbalists described the process of Tikkun are the "discovery of the roots of one's own soul", "development in the womb of the celestial mother", and "the reunification of the trees of life and knowledge". Each of the Kabbalistic metaphors are extremely suggestive and, looked at from the point of view of contemporary psychoanalysis, we can discover amongst these metaphors economic, dynamic, structural, developmental and even object-relations themes.

A discussion of each of these metaphors is beyond the scope of this essay. However, as an illustration, it may be worth our while to focus upon one of these metaphors, "the development in the womb of the celestial mother". In the Lurianic Kabbalah, several world personalities or Partzufim are said to have emerged spontaneously as a result of the Breaking of the Vessels. Psychologically, these Partzufim can be understood as distinct personas or aspects of a fragmented self, such fragmentation being inevitable in the course of human development.

One of these Partzufim, Zeir Anpin the "short faced" or "impatient one" is, according to the Kabbalists of Safed, connected with the phase of Tikkun that involves the efforts of humankind. Of interest to us here is the fact that Zeir Anpin himself is described as developing within the womb of another of the Partzufim, Imma, the celestial mother. Theologically we have, as Scholem has pointed out, a myth of God giving birth to himself [3, p. 141]. Psychologically, we have an account of a self initiated rebirth or personal development.

Within the celestial mother, Zeir Anpin, is said to progress through five distinct stages: conception, pregnancy, birth, childhood and gadolot or maturity. This final stage is reflective of mankind's own intellectual and moral maturity. Of great significance is the fact that the Partzuf Imma, within which Zeir Anpin's development takes place, is dominated by the Sefirah Binah which is representative of divine understanding. Before the six emotional sefirot which are embodied in Zeir Anpin can achieve their Tikkun or restoration they must undergo a developmental process whereby they come under the guidance of a motherly understanding which is internal to God or, psychologically speaking, internal to the individual. Through such a process of understanding an individual becomes a mother to himself, one who empathically understands the various emotional aspects of his or her personality.

By now it should be evident that for Kabbalists our contemporary distinctions between such disciplines as psychology, theology, philosophy and even politics make little or no sense. For the Kabbalists a self restorative act is at the same time a world restorative act, and the individual who discovers the roots of his own soul also discovers his purpose in life in the world at large. I think that we as contemporary psychotherapists would do well to keep this message in mind in our work with our own patients. One sure sign that treatment is resolving to good effect is that the patient shows a deep and abiding interest not only towards others but towards some aspect of the world at large where he or she feels satisfaction in making a distinctive contribution.

In getting to know and understand my patients I oftentimes ask myself what sparks are there in the world that this individual is destined to raise, and by this I mean something like "how can this individual actualize his or her unique talents in a manner which is deeply satisfying to himself and beneficial to others". The Hasidim affirmed that there are divine sparks in all things; in the substance of earth, food and air, the laws of society, the thoughts and emotions of men. A sculptor, for example, by imposing a form on formless clay or marble, can be said to raise sparks in transforming an earthly material into a human or divine symbol. Each of us is enjoined to a similar task appropriate to our own talents and abilities. In listening empathically to our patient's passions, desires and all but forgotten aspirations we are in a position to help them grasp their tikkun and, by creating an environment in which those aspirations are nurtured, direct them to those sparks which they themselves can raise.

In this regard I take particular interest in my patient's earliest loves, asking straight out in the beginning of the therapy if they have ever been in love and listening intently upon the answer. For falling in love is more likely to emanate from the true self than any other experience or passion; one can hardly fall in love out of obligation. Once our patients have re-experienced and genuinely grasped the nature of their love life, they are in a far better position to enter into the very essence of their desire and the nature