|Rothschild, 9/11 & WWIII top|
|US Federal Reserve top|
|IMF/World Bank top|
|Multilateral Investment Banks top|
|US Federal Debt & dollar collapse top|
|(dumping) US Dollar top|
Cost, abuse and danger of the dollar By Rudo de Ruijter, Netherlands,
Those who use dollars outside the US continuously pay a contribution to the US. It comes in the form of an inflation of 1.25 million dollars per minute. This is the result of the fast increase of the US foreign debt. Half of all US’ imports are simply added to the foreign debt and paid for by the foreign dollar holders through inflation.
Moreover these dollar holders do not seem to realize, that the dollar rate they are looking at, is nothing more than a dangerous façade. If they don’t understand what is still keeping it upright, the façade may hit them by surprise.
Meanwhile, well camouflaged, the dollar is at the center of several US’ conflicts.
1. World wide demand for dollars
2. Free shopping for the US
3. Bankrupt and still continuing
4. Dollar reserves Japan and China
5. Camouflaged conflicts
6. How do you steal oil reserves?
7. Euro versus dollar
8. Green cancer cells
1. World wide demand for dollars
Up to 1971, each US dollar represented a fixed amount of gold. The US disposed of enormous gold reserves, which covered the total value of all issued dollars. When foreign banks had more dollars than they wanted, they could exchange it into gold. That was the main reason why the dollar was accepted world wide
In 1971 the gold guarantee for the dollar was lifted. In fact, this was an emergency move of president Nixon: the Vietnam war had cost more than the US could afford and more dollars had been printed than the gold reserves allowed. Since then, the value of the dollar is established by the law of offer and demand on the exchange markets.
In the early seventies the US still produced enough oil for its own consumption. To protect its own oil enterprises against foreign competition, oil imports were limited. In exchange for the lift of limitations, the OPEC countries promised they would only accept dollars for their oil. The dollar was the most used currency in the world trade. So nothing special?
Since 1971 everyone who wants to import oil, has to buy dollars first.  That is where the fun starts for the US. Almost everybody needs oil, so everybody wants dollars.
Oil buyers from all over the world hand over their yens, crowns, francs and other currencies. They receive greenbacks in return. With those dollars they go and buy oil in the OPEC-countries. The OPEC-countries will spend the money again. Of course, they can do that in the US, but also in all other countries in the world. Everybody wants dollars, for everybody will need oil again.
2. Free shopping
In this oil trade a huge amount of dollars is needed. Many dollars will stay in the permanent money cycle outside the US, that is to say between the OPEC-countries and other countries. The US consumes 25 percent of the world oil production. In 2004 it produced about half of its needs itself. (Tendency quickly deterioating: in 2006 it needed to import 60 percent.)
At the start there were not enough dollars for this. They had to be printed.  It cost the US paper and ink. But then the enormous benefit arrives: there is only one way to get those nice new greenbacks out of the country: the US goes shopping abroad. And as these greenbacks remain abroad permanently, the US never delivers something in return. So, these shoppings are for free!
This free shopping did not only occur at the start. As soon as more dollars are needed in the oil trade, by increase in price or volume, that means free shopping for the US.
The same thing happens when the number of dollars in the rest of world trade increases. Globalization, free world trade, world wide privatisations of public services, like gas, water and electricity supply, phone and transportation companies, swallow enormous amounts of dollars. Each minute more dollars disappear in every little corner of the globe. And, in the first place, each time this means free shopping for the US!
Of couse those free shoppings create a debt for he US. For, some day, the foreign countries could use those dollars to purchase things in the US. Then, finally, the US has to deliver “something” in return.
So, to avoid problems, the US should take care, that their purchases and sales stay balanced. After 1971, when more dollars were put into circulation, only in 1973 the US sold more then it bought. Afterwards the situation declined, and each year the US bought more foreign goods they never paid for. 
In the year 2004 alone, the shortage on the trade balance was $ 650 billion!  On a population of 300 million people this means, that on average, each US-citizen purchased for $ 2,167dollars of foreign goods they did not pay for!
In the same period, there were no improvements on the balance of payments. So the foreign debt of the US raised with $ 650.929.500.000 in one year. This is one and a quarter million dollar per minute!
US’ trade deficits are the biggest with China ($162 billion), Japan ($ 76 billion), Canada ($ 66 billion), Germany ($ 46 billion), Mexico ($ 45 billion), Venezuela ($ 20 billion), South-Korea ($ 20 billion), Ireland ($ 19 billion), Italy ($ 17 billion) and Maleisia ($ 17 billion) .
The exchange rate of the dollar
Each country which purchases more than it sells, will see the value of its money diminish. If you can not do a lot with a currency, demand decreases and its exchange value goes down. But what is true for all other currencies, is not true for the US dollar. As long as the whole world needs dollars to purchase oil, there will always be demand.
US consumes ¼ of world oil production. When the dollar rate climbs, only the price for the other ¾ of oil consumers will get higher. For the US the price stays the same.
When the oil-price climbs, more dollars are needed in the cycle. If oil consumption remains the same, those extra dollars can be printed and added to the cycle without decline of the exchange rate. Since the US imports 1/8 of world oil consumption, 7/8 of the extra dollars are needed outside the US. This means that at each increase of the oil-price, the US finances the increase with new greenbacks and sells 7 times as many new dollars abroad. Free shopping and making debts!
The US disposes of a wide range of tricks to influence the exchange rate. Put more dollars in circulation when the rate goes higher than wanted. Buy back dollars themselves when demand decreases, for instance by issuing bonds.
However, this solution costs money: the interest. All those interests together have reached such high levels, that new loans have to be contracted each time to pay for them. US debts increase faster each time!
3. Bankrupt and still continuing
On www.babylontoday.com/national_debt_clock.htm you can see the current debt and you can see how much it grows each second… 45 % of it is to be paid back to foreign borrowers. The foreign debt is that high, that the US cannot pay back her debt anymore. The US is bankrupt.
Nevertheless dollars are still traded normally. For the purchase of oil and gas they are still needed. And, misled by an apparently healthy exchange rate, the world trade continues to do its transactions in dollars. Business as usual?
According to the usual logic of economics, a lower rate of the dollar should lead to more exports from the US and less imports by the US, as foreign importers can buy cheaper in the US then. However, as long as foreigners are mad enough to accept dollars, the US doesn’t find it a problem to issue some more of these green debt bills.
Pay a bit more for Chinese socks and electronics from Japan? No problem. The US just increases het imports and foreign debt a bit harder. Paying more dollars for a product means inflation. And one percent of inflation means that at the same time the value of the tremendous foreign debt dereases with one percent. So the US has no interest at all in putting a break on its imports!
In the oil trade, generally, a lowering dollar rate does have a logical consequence. Oil exporters will not accept a lower return. When the dollar falls with 10 percent, they will raise the oil price 10 percent, so the value remains the same.
If you don’t need dollars for oil anymore…
If US-dollars are no longer necessary to purchase oil, there is no advantage for the rest of the world trade to use the dollar - only disadvantages. The dollar does not represent any weight in gold anymore and the enormous debt will lead to the logical disastrous consequences. The dollar would collapse.
And when foreigners don’t accept dollars anymore, the US cannot print dollars to shop on the expense of the rest of the world. US could not pay its expensive army. It would loose its influence.
Vanishing of the debt
The collapse of the dollar will have a miraculous side effect for the US. When dollars are worth nothing, the foreign debt will have disappeared too. This debt is composed by dollars abroad. In the extreme case they will become as worthy as old paper. Unfortunately, the collapse will also be accompanied by the collapse of banks, enterprises and international organizations, which have coupled their destiny to the dollar.
4. Dollar reserves Japan and China
An important group of dollar purchasers is formed by the central bankers in various countries. Central banks keep strategic reserves. These are reserves with which they can buy back their own currency, if large quantities of it are offered on the exchange markets. This way, they prevent that the rate of their own currency would drop.
These reserves are preferably held in the best accepted currency in the world, so up to now in dollars. However, in China and Japan, but also in Taiwan, South-Korea and other countries, these dollar reserves have grown way above the necessary strategic quantity. 
This is not because central banks like to hoard US-dollars that much. On the contrary. Those countries export a lot and that is why dollars flow in massively. They have to be exchanged into local money to pay the workers and raw materials. The strong demand for local money would normally raise its rate, and then the products would become more expensive for foreigners. So, in order not to endanger the country’s export position, the local central banks try to keep the rate of their money stable. They do so by buying the inflowing dollars.
For these countries this is a big problem, because for all these hoarded dollars the central banks issue local money. So, in fact, the workers receive inflation of local money as payment for their exported products. 
Over time they have exported many months of work and material for nothing. At the central banks these dollars do not make much profit. They can be exchanged into obligations and US-bonds and offer a bit of interest. But even this interest cannot really be called an earning. The US simply pays the interest out of an spiraling increase of the foreign debt, so, from the inflation of the dollar.
Meanwhile the value of the hoarded dollars is subject to the variations in the dollar rate. On top of that, the risk of a dollar collapse is never far away. The Asian central banks are trapped between the necessity to lower their dollar reserves, the need to buy dollars to keep their local currency stable and eventually to buy dollars when its rate is in danger to fall on the global currency markets.
Meanwhile the US lets its foreign debt increase faster and faster. How long can this go on?
At the same time experts of the Asian Development Bank think, that the rate of the dollar should decrease by 30 to 40 percent!  With such a decrease there is a big risk, that banks and enterprises want to get rid of their dollars as quick as possible and central banks will no longer be willing, or able, to avoid the total collapse. Who sells his dollars first is lucky, who waits has just bad luck.
5. Camouflaged conflicts
To keep the permanent demand for dollars going, oil sales must remain in dollars. That is why the US tries to keep as much influence as possible, as well on the US owned IPE and NYMEX world oil markets, as with the locals in power. By doing so the US secures its oil supply at the same time. Beyond that, lucrative contracts can be obtained from the local power, with which a maximum of benefits can be seized from the oil production.
Fear always wins of reason
But when the locals in power do not want to sell their oil in dollars anymore, the US has a problem. Then, the US-president will not explain how dependent the US is on the dollar demand. The conflict is always camouflaged. And to do so, always an emotional theme is choosen. In times gone by this was the danger for communists, today it is the danger for terrorists, fundamentalists and other popular bogies, like “the ennemie has weapons of mass destruction” or “the ennemie tries to make nukes.”
The fact that there is, rationally, not a single proof, does not matter. The emotions always win. Even the fact, that these accusations can be turned around and then can be proved, is noticed by hardly anyone. The US has weapons of mass destruction and has used them; the US has nukes and has used them, and even threatened with them still in 2000.
But once again, at the moment accusations are loaded with emotions humans switch off their intelligence. Reason is no argument for peace anymore. The theater is only about the launched accusations. And because, as a result, only specialists of weapons of mass destruction or nukes are called upon to give their opinion, nearly nobody finds out what the conflict is really about.
In Venezuela, since many years, the US tries to pull down president Chavez, pretexting he is a dangerous communist. Chavez has nationalized the oil industry and has set up Barter-deals to export Venezuelean oil in exchange for medical care from Cuba and others. In Barter deals there is no necessity for dollars and the US has no profit from the oil trade.
Until 1990 the US maintained lucrative commercial contacts with Saddam Hussein. He was a good ally. For instance, in 1980 he had tried to free the hostages at the US-embassy in Teheran.
But in 1989 Saddam accused Kuwait of flooding the oil market and making the oil price go down. The following year Saddam tried to annexe Kuwait. It led to an immediate turn around of the attitude of the US. With the annexation Saddam would dispose of 20 percent of world oil reserves. The Iraqi were chased out of Kuwait by the US, with an alliance of 134 countries, and condamned to water and bread by a UN-embargo that lasted ten years.
Although the US sought a way to re-establish its influence in Iraq, Saddam’s switch to the euro on November 6, 2000 , would lead to the US invasion. The dollar sank away and in July 2002 the situation got that serious, that the IMF warned that the dollar might collapse.  A few days later the plans for an attack were discussed at Downing Street.  One month later Cheney proclamed it was sure now, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.  With this pretext the US invaded Iraq on March 19, 2003. The US switched back the oil trade into dollars on June 5, 2003. 
There is a huge difference between trading Iraqi oil in euros and trading it in dollars. This will be explained below. (See: “How do you steal oil reserves?”)
The US is in conflict with Iran, since it was thrown out of the country in 1979. According to the US, Iran is a dangerous country of fundamentalists.
The geographical position of Iran, between the Caspian Sea and the Indian Ocean, complicates US ambitions to control the rich reserves of oil and gas on the East side of the Caspian Sea. To transport this oil and gas to world markets without crossing neither Russia, nor Iran, pipelines had to be built through Afghanistan. Plans were made in the early nineties, but the pipelines are still not there.
Meanwhile the US tries to frustrate all competing projects of other countries.
Of course, this led to multiple conflicts of interest with Iran. George W. Bush would pretext the presence of Osama bin Laden to start a war against Afghanistan. 
In 1999 Iran publicly stated it wanted to accept euros for its oil as well. Iran sells 30 % of its oil production to Europe, the rest mainly to India an China and not a drip to the US, as a result of an embargo established by the US itself. In spite of Bush’ threatening tale, mentionning the country in his famous “axis of evil”, Iran started to sell its oil in euros from spring 2003.
After that, Iran wanted to establish its own oil-bourse, independent from the IPE and NYMEX. It would start on 20 March 2006. Considering the very weak health of the dollar at that time, a succes of this bourse could have led to a catastroph for the dollar and thus for he US. That is why tensions were very high at the beginning of 2006. 
Finally the opening of the oil-bourse was postponed. After that Putin established an oil bourse in Russia as quickly as possible, which took away the interest of the Iranian oil bourse.   
The US accuses Iran of wanting to make nukes. This is not new. Iran and other Arabic countries feel threatened by the nuclear arsenal of Israel, that is not a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. In 1981 Israel has bombed the nearly completed power plant in Osirak, in Iraq. Since, several Arab countries consider to get nuclear arms to counter the Israelian threat.
It may seem strange, that a country disposing of oil, wants nuclear energy. Iran exports oil, but imports refined oil products. These are needed for lighting, heating, transport and industry of its growing population. For many Iranians the real price of these products would be too high. That is why they are sold cheap, with losses for the Iranian treasury. The switch to electricity should provide affordable energy for the whole country. Iran needs the revenues from its oil exports to finance the import of many other products it needs. That is the reason why Iran does not refine and consume its oil itself.
The bombing of power plants remain an interesting objectif for the adversaries of Iran. If Iran cannot dispose of nuclear energy, it would have to decide to consume its oil, in stead of selling it in euros. Lately, the chief of the IAEA, ElBaradei, warned the adversaries not to attack the Iranian facilities. 
Moreover, a masterly plan has been conceived to take possession of the world market for nuclear fuel, in concert with a few other countries and using Iran as the pretext and the test case. With this plan the demand for dollars would be secured for a long time, even after the oil age, 
Since 8 June 2006 Russia too has turned its back to the dollar.  By selling the dollar surpluses to central banks, Putin took care that it had no influence on the dollar rate. However, the basis for the world wide dollar demand has decreased a lot. The US needs Russia for its plans to take possession of the world market for nuclear fuel, so a revenge by the US is unlikely.
6. How do you steal oil reserves?
There is still another aspect to the abuse of the dollar. During the demonstrations against the US-invasion of Iraq, a lot of demonstrators understood it was not about weapons of mass destruction. Iraq has wold’s second largest oil reserves. Some demonstrators thought, the US was after the oil. And that is also true. But how can you steal oil reserves, which are in the ground and so huge you cannot take them with you?
You do it with currencies. By imposing, that this oil can only be traded in dollars, in one move the US becomes owner of this oil. The US is the only country, which has the right to print dollars and thus can dispose of the oil any time. Other countries that want to buy this oil, have to buy dollars first. In fact they pay their oil to the US at that moment. The dollars they receive are rights to collect a quantity of oil. (Just like when you go to Ikea to buy furniture, you pay first and you receive a note, with which you can collect your furniture at the shop’s back door.) So, basically, dollars are rights to collect oil. And because everybody needs oil, everybody wants these green notes.
So, Saddam’s switch to the euro at the start of November 2000 was not just an attack on the rate of the dollar. The switch implied at the same time the US could not dispose freely of the oil anymore. The US would have to buy euros to dispose of it.
Since switching back the dollar on 5 June 2003 , the US has, financially, free disposal of the Iraqi oil again. Now it is a matter of installing a strawman-government and to prevent the Iraqi oil trade from switching away from the dollar once again. That is easy to say, but turns out to be more difficult than expected.
The dollar economy is not limited to the US. Oil reserves traded in dollars belong to it too. Also enterprises, banks and investments, anywhere in the world, belong to it when paid with dollars. They are like small islands of the dollar economy. Benefits and dividents are flowing back to the owners. The value of the investments is influenced by the rate of the dollar. Oil sellers, receiving their proceeds in dollars, are actors in the dollar-economy and usually behave like perfect representatives of the US’ interests. They consider this as their own interest.
7. Euro versus dollar
Since January 1993 the euro is quoted. In July 2005 the rate is identique as at its introduction: $ 1.22. The new currency has experienced quite some fluctuations during its short life. From the end of 1998 the euro slides away, until the moment Saddam Hussein switches to the euro in November 2000. Although the US switched the oil trade back into dollars in June 2003, the euro continued its rise. Since spring 2003 Iran had started to sell oil in euros.
The euro has become a small world currency. Between July 2004 and July 2005 the part of the dollar in world trade went down from 70 percent to 64 percent. A bit less then half of these 64 percent is related to US foreign trade. If the euro wants to become as mighty as the dollar, it has still a long way to go.
In principle, the euro contains the same risks as the dollar. As long as there would be a motor for a permanent demand for euros like, for instance, oil sales in euros, the eurozone could make debts and let it increase indefinitely.
To avoid such debts, the eurozone would have to export the equivalent of all euros needed outside its borders and keep the same amount in foreign currencies in their central bank. Why would they? The credit trick worked fine for the US during more than 30 years!
When oil producing countries would sell oil in two or three different currencies, like it has been considered in the past, this simply means that the three involved countries can do the same trick as the US does now. In the long run it would multiply the problem by three.
The only solution for this problem would be that oil selling countries accept all currencies on the market. Tehran has already taken into consideration to accept more than one currency and not just the euro. Step by step.
8. Green cancer cells
Because the US let its “foreign debt” increase indefinitely and even uses military power to keep the related advantages going, we cannot speak of a normal foreign debt, like we know it in trade relations among other countries of the world. What the US does is robbery. You can also call it swindle or an imperial tax imposed on the users of dollars. But there is more.
Each dollar bill is an IOU of the US, a promise to give something in return. Due to the gigantic quantities the US has put into circulation, the country is not able to redeem these debts. It is bankrupt. Only the rate of the dollar keeps up the appearance, that nothing is afoot. The obligation to pay gas and oil in dollars keeps a permanent demand going.
However, the rate is held in shape artificially, like by the hoarding of the central banks in China, Japan, Taiwan and other countries. Because these hoardings mean an empoverishment of these countries and because the US speeds up the debt building indefinitely, there will be a moment that these central banks have to stop hoarding dollars. So the question is not IF the dollar collapses, but WHEN.
Because traders are misled by the apparently healthy dollar rate, many still accept these IOU’s, which nestle like green cancer cells in all economies of the world. The result is ineluctable. All infected banks, enterprises and economies will be dragged along the day the demand for dollars sags and the US-imperium collapses.
 Except oil imports from Iraq between November 6th 2000 and June 5th 2003, from Iran since spring 2003 and from Russia since June 8, 2006
 “Printing dollars” is a way of speaking. Most dollars only exist as numbers on bank accounts.
 Trade balances 1960- 2002
 Trade deficit 2004:
NOTE: huge differences between US' and Chinese data for US' imports! http://www.bis.org/publ/work217.pdf (page 9)
 Washington Post:
 Epoch Times http://en.epochtimes.com/news/6-11-7/47852.html
 Int. Herald Tribune:
 Iraqi oil in euros:
 IMF warning over dollar collapse:
 Downing Street Memo: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article387374.ece
 How can the dollar collapse in Iran? (See Iraq)
 Pipelines to 9/11: &
 How can the dollar collapse in Iran?
 RTS announcement:
 RTS speeding up:
 RTS opening:
 Raid on Nuclear Fuel Market: http://www.courtfool.info/en_Raid%20on%20Nuclear%20Fuel%20Market.htm
 Financial Times, 5 June 2003
The author can be joint at www.courtfool.info
|How The Rothschilds Control And
Dictate To The World
by William Dean A. Garner
|Bank For International Settlements (BIS): How The
Rothschilds Control And Dictate To The World by William Dean A. Garner
For decades, people have urged me, pushed me, prodded me, practically peeled off my skin, pulled out my eyes, and yanked out my brain to prove it, i.e. show them the data, the results, the books, manuals, pamphlets, journals, monographs, voice and video recordings, all the resources I have used to make the statements I do about the Brzezinski Cartel and the Rothschilds. ... On the evening of St. Patrick’s Day 2010, I feel now is the time . . . but with a twist. ... The list below shows 165 different ways how The First Sphere of Influence (Rothschilds and Brzezinski Cartel) controls the world. One hundred and sixty-five reasons to believe what I say to be 100% accurate and true. ... Each entry is a separate and distinct central bank, located in a separate and distinct part of the world. These central banks cover the globe and know absolutely no boundaries, effectively erasing borders between even sworn enemies. ... The BIS (pronounced BIZZ) is the Rothschild’s piggy bank, a veritable deep-pit mine, the equivalent of quadrillions of dollars. quadrillion quad·ril’lion adj.
1. The cardinal number equal to 1015. 2. Chiefly British. Septillion.
What’s the significance of having a central bank within a country and why should you concern yourself, your family and colleagues?
Central banks are illegally created PRIVATE banks that are owned by the Rothschild banking family. The family has been around for more than 230 years and has slithered its way into each country on this planet, threatened every world leader and their governments and cabinets with physical and economic death and destruction, and then emplaced their own people in these central banks to control and manage each country’s pocketbook. Worse, the Rothschilds also control the machinations of each government at the macro level, not concerning themselves with the daily vicissitudes of our individual personal lives. Except when we get too far out of line.
The grand plan of The First Sphere of Influence is to create a global mononation. Please do not confuse this with the term globalization. Mononation and globalization couldn’t be more different in concept, scope and purpose. Mononation is one state. It has one government. One set of laws for all ordinary citizens, no laws for the elite. Globalization refers to communicating, trading, interacting, etc. among separate, different, independent, sovereign countries.
The grand plan of The First Sphere of Influence is to create a global mononation.
Our own Federal Reserve is an illegally emplaced private bank that is directly responsible for creating all the US’s depressions, recessions, and the inflation and deflation of our dollar. The Fed controls the printing of our own currency, and then charges the US government interest on those loans. The interest is growing each year, making it difficult if not impossible for our government to pay it. How do we pay this interest? By the US Personal Income Tax. This tax goes to the Rothschild family.
In the coming months, as I continue to gather intel and write a book about The First Sphere of Influence, I will share more and more. For now, I kindly ask that you read each of the 165 lines below. One hundred and sixty-five reasons to believe my intel. You can click on each bank and visit its website. I’ve seen each one. They’re real. And they’re one of the reasons why each country is in such deep debt to this insidious family, the Rothschilds.
By the way, if you’re curious what the US debt is to the BIS, please refer to the table at the end of this article, taken from the latest statistical results provided by the Joint External Debt Hub, which receives data from the BIS, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. BIS Offices
Representative Office for Asia and the Pacific 78th floor, Two International Finance Centre 8 Finance Street, Central Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Telephone: (+852) 2878 7100 Fax: (+852) 2878 7123
Representative Office for the Americas Torre Chapultepec Rubén Darío 281 – 17th floor Col. Bosque de Chapultepec Del. Miguel Hidalgo 11580 México, D.F. México Telephone: (+52) 55 91380290 Fax: (+52) 55 91380299 The Rothschild-Owned Central Banks of the World
Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan Albania: Bank of Albania Algeria: Bank of Algeria Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia Austria: Austrian National Bank Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus Belgium: National Bank of Belgium Belize: Central Bank of Belize Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana: Bank of Botswana Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia Cameroon: Bank of Central African States Canada: Bank of Canada - Banque du Canada Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States Chad: Bank of Central African States Chile: Central Bank of Chile China: The People’s Bank of China Colombia: Bank of the Republic Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros Congo: Bank of Central African States Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Croatia: Croatian National Bank Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus Czech Republic: Czech National Bank Denmark: National Bank of Denmark Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States Estonia: Bank of Estonia Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia European Union: European Central Bank Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji Finland: Bank of Finland France: Bank of France Gabon: Bank of Central African States The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia Georgia: National Bank of Georgia Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank Ghana: Bank of Ghana Greece: Bank of Greece Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Guyana: Bank of Guyana Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland India: Reserve Bank of India Indonesia: Bank Indonesia Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland Israel: Bank of Israel Italy: Bank of Italy Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica Japan: Bank of Japan Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya Korea: Bank of Korea Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic Latvia: Bank of Latvia Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho Libya: Central Bank of Libya Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Malta: Central Bank of Malta Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius Mexico: Bank of Mexico Moldova: National Bank of Moldova Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro Morocco: Bank of Morocco Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique Namibia: Bank of Namibia Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal Netherlands: Netherlands Bank Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria Norway: Central Bank of Norway Oman: Central Bank of Oman Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru Philippines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Poland: National Bank of Poland Portugal: Bank of Portugal Qatar: Qatar Central Bank Romania: National Bank of Romania Russia: Central Bank of Russia Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Serbia: National Bank of Serbia Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands South Africa: South African Reserve Bank Spain: Bank of Spain Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka Sudan: Bank of Sudan Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank Switzerland: Swiss National Bank Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania Thailand: Bank of Thailand Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Uganda: Bank of Uganda Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates United Kingdom: Bank of England United States: The Dirty Nasty Stinky Fed, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen Zambia: Bank of Zambia Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.
Jacob Rothschild, the current head of the Rothschild dynasty, has
intermarried with the Sinclair family, forging an important alliance
between the head family of the Illuminati, and the supposed descendants
of the Grail family.
As has been popularized recently by Dan Brown in the Da Vinci Code, or before him by the Holy Blood, Holy Grail, the Stuarts of Scotland are supposedly descended from King Arthur and Jesus Christ. These families are of course not descended from Jesus. The idea is preposterous. But they are related to the Holy Grail, and they are not Christians, but Kabbalists.
In reality, they, like all the aristocratic bloodlines that form the core of the Illuminati, are descended from Guillaume de Gellone of the eighth century AD. Guillaume's father was Rabbi Makhir, among the Exilarchs who ruled the Jews in Baghdad, who was sent West after a dispute over the successorship. In France, he took the name Theodoric, married Alda, the aunt of Charlemagne, and was appointed “King of the Jews” in the region of the Languedoc, with his capital the city of Narbonne.
Narbonne then became the heartland of the Medieval Kabbalah. The Kabbalists of Narbonne seem to have been responsible for instigating the Crusades, in order to retrieve sacred texts that had been buried there, but which had been unaccessible because of first the rule of the Romans, and then the Muslims. Once Jerusalem was conquered, a Kabbalistic order of knights known as the Templars conducted excavations, and discovered the text of the Sepher ha Bahir, which revived the lost mystical tradition, and set off the cultural revolution of the Medieval Kabbalah.
Another aspect of the penetration of these Kabbalistic ideas was the heresy of the Cathars. The Cathar foothold was in the region of Tolouse, the bastion of the descendants of Guillaume, also known as the family of the Guilhemids, several of whom were ardent defenders of the heresy. However, the Cathars have been idealized by numerous Illuminati propagandists as having been innocent victims of Church persecutions, but the Cathars rejected the God of the Bible, in favour of the worship of Lucifer and practiced witchcraft. It was the Cathars who influenced the heretical aspects of the Templars, for which the order was disbanded in 1307.
Part of this Kabbalistic revolution was the legends of the Holy Grail, which included Cathar and Templar themes, and formulated in the region of Aquitaine, another stronghold of the Guilhemids. The Holy Grail, or San Greal, should have been translated as Sang Real, or Royal Blood, because it referred to the sacred bloodline that supposedly issued from Guillaume de Gellone, and ultimately King David, but which in reality, was understood to represent the descendants of the Fallen Angels, and their leader, Lucifer.
The Sinclairs were descendants of Guillaume de Gellone, through his great-great-granddaughter, Poppa of Bavaria, who married the Viking leader, Rollo Ragnvaldsson. Among Rollo's descendants was William the Conqueror of Normandy. The Sinclairs, or St. Clair, were given various other castles around France. However, they all went to England with the Conqueror. One Sinclair, though, named William, did not like the Conqueror, so with some other discontented barons, he went to Scotland and placed himself in the service of King Malcolm III of Scotland.
Malcolm III King of Scotland was the father of David I "the Saint" King of Scotland. In 1128, soon after the Council of Troyes, Hugh de Payens, the Templars' first Grand Master, met with King David I of Scotland. King David later surrounded himself with Templars, and appointed them as "the Guardians of his morals by day and night".
David married the grand-daughter of Lambert II, the brother of Godefroi de Bouillon, leader of the first crusade, and the sister of sister of William the Conqueror. Godefroi's younger brother, Eustace III, married David's sister, Mary Scots. Their daughter married Stephen I King of England, the son Adela de Normandie, the daughter of William the Conqueror. Adela's brother, Henry I King of England, married David's sister, Editha of Scotland. Their daughter, Mathilda Empress of England, married Geoffrey V, Comte d'Anjou, whose son Henry II married Eleanor of Aquitaine.
King David granted Hugues and his knights the lands of Balantrodoch, by the Firth of Forth, but now renamed Temple, near the site of Rosslyn. And, legend has it that, when the Templars came under trial, their leader de Molay arranged for the Templar to return to Scotland, where they assisted Robert the Bruce at the Battle of Bannockburn.
Robert the Bruce claimed the Scottish throne as a great-great-great-great grandson of David. Walter Stewart, the sixth High Steward of Scotland, also played an important part in the Battle of Bannockburn. Walter Stewart then married Majory, daughter of Robert the Bruce, and their son Robert II of Scotland was heir to the House of Bruce; he eventually inherited the Scottish throne after his uncle David II of Scotland died.
In Scotland, the Templars served Robert the Bruce as members of the Scots Guard, of which two prominent families were those of the Stuarts and the Sinclairs. Henry Sinclair was a supporter of Robert the Bruce, and one of his descendants, William Sinclair, designed Rosslyn Chapel, a church in the village of Roslin, replete with occult symbolism, and believed to be one of the sites where the Grail might be buried. Finally, the Sinclairs became the Hereditary Grand Masters of the Masons of Scotland.
After Queen Elizabeth died without an heir, she was succeeded by the son of Mary Queen of Scots, James Stewart I of England, also known as King James. It is for this reason that the Freemasons of the eighteenth century conspired to back the Stuart cause, after their last monarch, James II Stuart, King of England, was deposed, and replaced by William of Orange. The Stuart cause then became the essence of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, which regarded the Stuarts as the inheritors of the Templars, who had rescued the secret tradition of the East, otherwise known as the Kabbalah.
Since the late eighteenth century, however, the Illuminati have come under the leadership of the Rothschild family. The founder of the dynasty, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, ordered his sons to marry only their first cousins, continuing the careful intermarrying practiced by their predecessors.
However, the first exception was Hannah, the daughter of Amschel Mayer's son, the notorious Nathan Mayer Rothschild, who married the Rt. Hon. Henry Fitzroy, a direct descendant of Charles II Stuart King of England, the father of James II.
More recently, however, is the great-great-great grandson of Nathan Mayer, Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild, who married Mary Serena Dunn. The mother of Mary Serena was Lady Mary Sybil St. Clair-Erskine, who was the daughter of James Francis Harry St. Clair-Erskine, 5th Earl of Rosslyn.
Jacob Rothschild is the current head of the UK Rothschild family, having inherited the fourth baronetcy from his father, Victor, an eminent zoologist, and sometime MI5 agent and friend of KGB agents Anthony Blunt and Guy Burgess. Jacob resigned from the family's bank NM Rothschilds in 1980, run by his cousin Evelyn, and started RIT Capital Partners.
Jacob Rothschild resigned from the family's bank NM Rothschilds in 1980, run by his cousin Evelyn, and started RIT Capital Partners. He is chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation, which built and gave the Knesset government buildings and the Supreme Court to Israel, and chairs the Jewish Policy Research, dedicated to promoting issues affecting Jews worldwide.
Jacob Rothschild is chairman of Yad Hanadiv, the Rothschild foundation, which chairs the Jewish Policy Research, dedicated to promoting issues affecting Jews worldwide. Yad Hanadiv was also responsible for building and granting the Knesset government buildings, and the Supreme Court of Israel, which prominently features Masonic symbolism and the pyramid and all-seeing eye of the Illuminati.
Jacob Rothschild was a close personal friend of the Princess Diana, and maintains strong personal and business links with Henry Kissinger. He knows Rupert Murdoch well, having been friends since the Australian newspaper proprietor first came to the UK in the 1960s. His country estate has been a regular venue for visiting heads of state including Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. Margaret Thatcher received French President François Mitterrand there at a summit in 1990. He hosted the European Economic Round Table conference in 2002, attended by such figures
as James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank, Nicky Oppenheimer,
Warren Buffet and Arnold Schwarzenegger.
|Wikipedia, Rothschild Family|
|The Rothschild family (German: , French:, known as
The House of Rothschild, or more simply as the Rothschilds, is a
European dynasty, of German-Jewish origin, that established European
banking and finance houses starting in the late 18th century. Five lines
of the Austrian branch of the family have been elevated to Austrian
nobility, being given hereditary baronies of the Habsburg Empire by
Emperor Francis II in 1816. Another line, of the British branch of the
family, was elevated to British nobility at the request of Queen
Victoria. During the 1800s, when it was at its height, the family
is believed to have possessed by far the largest private fortune in the
world as well as by far the largest fortune in modern world
history. Today, Rothschild businesses are on smaller scale than
they were throughout the 19th century, although they encompass a diverse
range of fields, including: private asset management, financial advice,
mixed farming, wine, and charities. Contents [hide] 1 Family
overview 2 The Napoleonic Wars 3 International high finance 4 English
branch 5 French branches 6 Austrian branch 7 Naples branch 8 Jewish
identity and positions on Zionism 9 Modern business 9.1 The Rothschild
Group 9.2 Edmond de Rothschild Group 9.3 RIT Capital Partners 9.4
Investment 9.5 Wine 9.6 Art and charity 10 Cultural references 11
Conspiracy theories 12 Prominent descendants of Mayer Amschel Rothschild
13 See also 14 Notes 15 Further reading 15.1 Documentary film 16
External links Family overview
The first member of the family who was known to use the name "Rothschild" was Izaak Elchanan Rothschild, who was born in 1577. The name means "Red Shield" in old German. The family's ascent to international prominence began in 1744, with the birth of Mayer Amschel Rothschild in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. He was the son of Amschel Moses Rothschild, (born circa 1710), a money changer who had traded with the Prince of Hesse. Born in the ghetto (called "Judengasse" or Jewish-alley) of Frankfurt, Mayer developed a finance house and spread his empire by installing each of his five sons in the five main European financial centres to conduct business. The Rothschild coat of arms contains a clenched fist with five arrows symbolizing the five dynasties established by the five sons of Mayer Rothschild, in a reference to Psalm 127: "Like arrows in the hands of a warrior". The family motto appears below the shield: Concordia, Integritas, Industria (Harmony, Integrity, Industry). Paul Johnson writes "[T]he Rothschilds are elusive. There is no book about them that is both revealing and accurate. Libraries of nonsense have been written about them... A woman who planned to write a book entitled Lies about the Rothschilds abandoned it, saying: 'It was relatively easy to spot the lies, but it proved impossible to find out the truth'". He writes that, unlike the court Jews of earlier centuries, who had financed and managed European noble houses, but often lost their wealth through violence or expropriation, the new kind of international bank created by the Rothschilds was impervious to local attacks. Their assets were held in financial instruments, circulating through the world as stocks, bonds and debts. Changes made by the Rothschilds allowed them to insulate their property from local violence: "Henceforth their real wealth was beyond the reach of the mob, almost beyond the reach of greedy monarchs." Johnson argued that their fortune was generated to the greatest extent by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in London; however more recent research by Niall Ferguson, indicates that greater and equal profits also were realised by the other Rothschild dynasties, including James Mayer de Rothschild in Paris, Carl von Rothschild and Amschel Mayer in Frankfurt. Another essential part of Mayer Rothschild's strategy for future success was to keep control of their banks in family hands, allowing them to maintain full secrecy about the size of their fortunes. About 1906, the Jewish Encyclopedia noted: "The practice initiated by the Rothschilds of having several brothers of a firm establish branches in the different financial centers was followed by other Jewish financiers, like the Bischoffsheims, Pereires, Seligmans, Lazards, and others, and these financiers by their integrity and financial skill obtained credit not alone with their Jewish confrères, but with the banking fraternity in general. By this means Jewish financiers obtained an increasing share of international finance during the middle and last quarter of the nineteenth century. The head of the whole group was the Rothschild family...". It also states: "Of more recent years, non-Jewish financiers have learned the same cosmopolitan method, and, on the whole, the control is now rather less than more in Jewish hands than formerly." Mayer Rothschild successfully kept the fortune in the family with carefully arranged marriages, often between first or second cousins (similar to Royal intermarriage). By the late 19th century, however, almost all Rothschilds had started to marry outside the family, usually into the aristocracy or other financial dynasties. His sons were: Amschel Mayer Rothschild (1773–1855): Frankfurt, died childless, passed to sons of Salomon and Calmann Salomon Mayer Rothschild (1774–1855): Vienna Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836): London Calmann Mayer Rothschild (1788–1855): Naples Jakob Mayer Rothschild (1792–1868): Paris The German family name "Rothschild" is pronounced approximately ROT-shillt in German, not wroth(s)-child as it is in English. The surname "Rothschild" is common in Germany, and the vast majority of the bearers of the name are unrelated to this family. Moreover, the German surnames "Rothschild" and "Rothchild" are not related to the Protestant surname "Rothchilds" from the United Kingdom.
|Committee of 300|
|The Committee of 300 is a product of the British East
India Company's Council of 300. The East India Company was chartered by
the British royal family in 1600. It made vast fortunes in the opium
drug trade with China and became the largest company on earth in its
time. Today, through many powerful alliances, the Committee of 300 rules
the world and is the driving force behind the criminal agenda to create
a "New World Order", under a "Totalitarian Global Government". There is
no need to use "they" or "the enemy" except as shorthand. We know who
"they", the enemy, is. The Committee of 300 with its "aristocracy", its
ownership of the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system, insurance
companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks,
presided over by a hierarchy of conspirators-this is the enemy. Secret
societies exist by deception. Each is a hierarchy with an inner circle
at the top, who deceives those below with lies, such as claiming a noble
agenda; thus, duping them into following a web of compartmentalized
complicity. The inner circle of the Committee of 300 is the Order of the
Garter, headed by Queen Elizabeth Windsor II. It is interesting to note
that the Windsor's changed their name from the Germanic
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha during WWI, because of anti-German sentiment.
Abdullah II, King of Jordan Abramovich, Roman Ackermann, Josef Adeane, Edward Agius, Marcus Ahtisaari, Martti Akerson, Daniel Albert II, King of Belgium Alexander, Crown Prince of Yugoslavia Amato, Giuliano Anderson, Carl A. Andreotti, Giulio Andrew, Duke of York Anne, Princess Royal Anstee, Nick Ash, Timothy Garton Astor, William Waldorf Aven, Pyotr Balkenende, Jan Peter Ballmer, Steve Balls, Ed Barroso, José Manuel Beatrix, Queen of the Netherlands Belka, Marek Bergsten, C. Fred Berlusconi, Silvio Bernake, Ben Bernstein, Nils Berwick, Donald Bildt, Carl Bischoff, Sir Winfried Blair, Tony Blankfein, Lloyd Blavatnik, Leonard Bloomberg, Michael Bolkestein, Frits Bolkiah, Hassanal Bonello, Michael C Bonino, Emma Boren, David L. Borwin, Duke of Mecklenburg Bronfman, Charles Bronfman, Edgar Jr. Bruton, John Brzezinski, Zbigniew Budenberg, Robin Buffet, Warren Bush, George HW Cameron, David Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall Cardoso, Fernando Henrique Carington, Peter Carl XVI Gustaf, King of Sweden Carlos, Duke of Parma Carney, Mark Carroll, Cynthia Caruana, Jaime Castell, Sir William Chan, Anson Chan, Margaret Chan, Norman Charles, Prince of Wales Chartres, Richard Chiaie, Stefano Delle Chipman, Dr John Chodiev, Patokh Christoph, Prince of Schleswig-Holstein Cicchitto, Fabrizio Clark, Wesley Clarke, Kenneth Clegg, Nick Clinton, Bill Cohen, Abby Joseph Cohen, Ronald Cohn, Gary Colonna di Paliano, Marcantonio, Duke of Paliano Constantijn, Prince of the Netherlands Constantine II, King of Greece Cooksey, David Cowen, Brian Craven, Sir John Crockett, Andrew Dadush, Uri D'Aloisio, Tony Darling, Alistair Davies, Sir Howard Davignon, Étienne Davis, David de Rothschild, Benjamin de Rothschild, David René de Rothschild, Evelyn de Rothschild, Leopold Deiss, Joseph Deripaska, Oleg Dobson, Michael Draghi, Mario Du Plessis, Jan Dudley, William C. Duisenberg, Wim Edward, Duke of Kent Edward, Earl of Wessex Elizabeth II, Queen of the United Kingdom Elkann, John Emanuele, Vittorio, Prince of Naples Ernst August, Prince of Hanover Feldstein, Martin Festing, Matthew Fillon, François Fischer, Heinz Fischer, Joschka Fischer, Stanley FitzGerald, Niall Franz, Duke of Bavaria Fridman, Mikhail Friso, Prince of Orange-Nassau Gates, Bill Geidt, Christopher Geithner, Timothy Georg Friedrich, Prince of Prussia Gibson-Smith, Dr Chris Gorbachev, Mikhail Gore, Al Gotlieb, Allan Green, Stephen Greenspan, Alan Grosvenor, Gerald, 6th Duke of Westminster Gurría, José Ángel Hague, William Hampton, Sir Philip Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechtenstein Harald V, King of Norway Harper, Stephen Heisbourg, François Henri, Grand Duke of Luxembourg Hildebrand, Philipp Hills, Carla Anderson Holbrooke, Richard Honohan, Patrick Howard, Alan Ibragimov, Alijan Ingves, Stefan Isaacson, Walter Juan Carlos, King of Spain Jacobs, Kenneth M. Julius, DeAnne Juncker, Jean-Claude Kenen, Peter Kerry, John King, Mervyn Kinnock, Glenys Kissinger, Henry Knight, Malcolm Koon, William H. II Krugman, Paul Kufuor, John Lajolo, Giovanni Lake, Anthony Lambert, Richard Lamy, Pascal Landau, Jean-Pierre Laurence, Timothy Leigh-Pemberton, James Leka, Crown Prince of Albania Leonard, Mark Levene, Peter Leviev, Lev Levitt, Arthur Levy, Michael Lieberman, Joe Livingston, Ian Loong, Lee Hsien Lorenz of Belgium, Archduke of Austria-Este Louis Alphonse, Duke of Anjou Louis-Dreyfus, Gérard Mabel, Princess of Orange-Nassau Mandelson, Peter Manning, Sir David Margherita, Archduchess of Austria-Este Margrethe II, Queen of Denmark Martínez, Guillermo Ortiz Mashkevitch, Alexander Massimo, Stefano, Prince of Roccasecca dei Volsci Massimo-Brancaccio, Fabrizio Prince of Arsoli and Triggiano McDonough, William Joseph McLarty, Mack Mersch, Yves Michael, Prince of Kent Michael, King of Romania Miliband, David Miliband, Ed Mittal, Lakshmi Moreno, Glen Moritz, Prince and Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel Murdoch, Rupert Napoléon, Charles Nasser, Jacques Niblett, Robin Nichols, Vincent Nicolás, Adolfo Noyer, Christian Ofer, Sammy Ogilvy, Alexandra, Lady Ogilvy Ogilvy, David, 13th Earl of Airlie Ollila, Jorma Oppenheimer, Nicky Osborne, George Oudea, Frederic Parker, Sir John Patten, Chris Pébereau, Michel Penny, Gareth Peres, Shimon Philip, Duke of Edinburgh Pio, Dom Duarte, Duke of Braganza Pöhl, Karl Otto Powell, Colin Prokhorov, Mikhail Quaden, Guy Rasmussen, Anders Fogh Ratzinger, Joseph Alois (Pope Benedict XVI) Reuben, David Reuben, Simon Rhodes, William R. Rice, Susan Richard, Duke of Gloucester Rifkind, Sir Malcolm Ritblat, Sir John Roach, Stephen S. Robinson, Mary Rockefeller, David Jr. Rockefeller, David Sr. Rockefeller, Nicholas Rodríguez, Javier Echevarría Rogoff, Kenneth Roth, Jean-Pierre Rothschild, Jacob Rubenstein, David Rubin, Robert Ruspoli, Francesco, 10th Prince of Cerveteri Safra, Joseph Safra, Moises Sands, Peter Sarkozy, Nicolas Sassoon, Isaac Sassoon, James Sawers, Sir Robert John Scardino, Marjorie Schwab, Klaus Schwarzenberg, Karel Schwarzman, Stephen A. Shapiro, Sidney Sheinwald, Nigel Sigismund, Grand Duke of Tuscany, Archduke of Austria Simeon of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha Snowe, Olympia Sofía, Queen of Spain Soros, George Specter, Arlen Stern, Ernest Stevenson, Dennis Steyer, Tom Stiglitz, Joseph Strauss-Kahn, Dominique Straw, Jack Sutherland, Peter Tanner, Mary Tedeschi, Ettore Gotti Thompson, Mark Thomson, Dr. James Tietmeyer, Hans Trichet, Jean-Claude Tucker, Paul Van Rompuy, Herman Vélez, Álvaro Uribe Verplaetse, Alfons Villiger, Kaspar Vladimirovna, Maria, Grand Duchess of Russia Volcker, Paul von Habsburg, Otto Waddaulah, Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin, Sultan of Brunei Walker, Sir David Wallenberg, Jacob Walsh, John Warburg, Max Weber, Axel Alfred Weill, Michael David Wellink, Nout Whitman, Marina von Neumann Willem-Alexander, Prince of Orange William Prince of Wales Williams, Dr Rowan Williams, Shirley Wilson, David Wolfensohn, James Wolin, Neal S. Woolf, Harry Woolsey, R. James Jr. Worcester, Sir Robert Wu, Sarah Zoellick, Robert
|Euro-Med.dk Your New World Central Bank and World Currency - Taken Out of Rothschild´s Expensive CO2-free Air|
|Summary: The Rothschild think tank, the Chatham House, has presented
its proposal for a world currency based on the International Monetary
Union´s (IMF) Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) - not based on real values,
but only set at a notional value arbitrarily conferred on them, probably
to be based on allocated CO2 allowances. The IMF would accordingly
become the world's Central Bank and Treasury. Already the IMF can be
regarded as a Rothschild subsidiary. The Chatham House suggests that the
IMF's head and the participating countries' central bank governors, who
are Rothschild-controlled, be given the task of controlling the world
currency! The UNEP, the UNCTAD and the G20 have made the same proposal.
The IMF is to have the right to 1. issue the first supranational
“currency” – i.e. paper money without any other backing than the
good-will and guarantees of the IMF member states. 2. to survey
currencies and deal with currency misalignments and promote monetary
coordination. 3. to increase the use of SDRs and here, until it becomes
the world currency – in international trading. 4. Take national
currencies at exchange rates, which the IMF fixes in return for – paper.
5. determining the wealth of nations by altering their exchange rates to
the SDRs. 6. regulate the production of SDRs – thus regulating
economical activity through inflation and deflation at the IMF´s liking.
7. In particular there needs to be a market-maker willing to buy and
sell SDR bonds at bid/offer spreads that are competitive vis-à-vis those
in existing bond markets – use as a unit of account and settlement for
oil and other commodities (Let us guess: Rothschild, J.P. Morgan will
assist). 8. Foster greater efforts in the peer monitoring and assessment
of the full range of economic policies that impinge on countries’
balance of payments and exchange rates. 9. Strengthen the role and
legitimacy of international institutions. 10. allowing it to issue its
own quarterly reports on exchange rate and other relevant policies 11.
The IMF would thereby become more vigorously engaged in ‘naming and
The following is a report from March 2010 from the famous British elitist think tank The Chatham House. It summarizes what has been forwarded by the UN, G 20 and also by China: A New World Order with a world currency, viz. the Special Drawing Rights SDRs and here of the IMF. It is also interesting, because it shows the thinking of the world government elite (according to EU Pres. van Rompuy, 2009 was the 1. year of global governance) : The IMF is to be a world central Bank, as the BIS has been till now.
2 fathers of the International Monetary Fund (IMF): Communist, Harry Dexter White, and John Maynard Keynes
Now let us see who is behind the IMF. It has joint world bank statistics with Rothschild´s BIS. The IMF cooperates with the BIS on financial stability ,and the IMF holds common conferences with the BIS on real estate and financial stability
The Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) is nothing but the Milner Group “writ large.” It was founded by the Group, has been consistently controlled by the Group, and to this day is the Milner Group in its widest aspect. It is the legitimate child of the Round Table organization also spawning the Council on Foreign Relations. The Round Table was the legitimate child of the “Closer Union” movement organized in South Africa in 1907
In his third will Cecil Rhodes left his entire estate to Freemason, Lord Nathan Rothschild as trustee. Rhodes stipulated that his gigantic fortune be used by his disciples to carry out the program he envisioned. Rothschild appointed Freemason Alfred Milner to head up the Secret society for which Rhodes's first will made provision. Upon his appointment by Rothschild to chair Rhodes's secret society, Milner recruited a group of young men from Oxford and Toynbee Hall to assist him in organizing his administration of the new society. All were respected English Freemasons. Among them were Rudyard Kipling, Arthur Balfour, Lord Rothschild, and some Oxford College graduates known as "Milner's Kindergarten." In 1909, Milner's Kindergarten, with some other English Masons, founded the Round Table. The grandfather of all modern British Masonic "think tanks" was born. Three powerful think tank offshoots of the Round Table are (1) the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), organized in 1919 in London; (2) the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), organized in 1921 in New York City; and (3) the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR – dissolved 1960), organized in 1925 or the twelve countries holding territory in what today we call the Pacific Rim.
The Chatham House – or as it was called until 2004: The Royal Institute for International Affairs, has a long and sinister history
Executive Summary and Recommendations “Beyond the Dollar” Rethinking the International Monetary System A Chatham House Report Edited by Paola Subacchi and John Driffill, Chatham House, Chatham House and the ESRC World Economy and Finance Programme have looked at the current system, assessed the goals and principles that underpin it and made some recommendations for the way forward.
Dominique Strauss– Kahn is very much pleased with the New World Order plans to make his IMF the World´s Central Bank
This decade will certainly be one of transition. We do not expect a big bang, but a long, gradual process of incremental change and adjustment. However, whether this transition and the rebalancing of the world economy will be smooth remains to be seen. As a result, the interests and requirements of the emerging economic powers should be taken into account. Policy cooperation should aim to avoid any protectionist reaction to exchange rate movements.
There is an argument for moving towards a multicurrency reserve system in line with the multipolar world, as well as expanding the use of a supranational currency such as the Special Drawing Right (SDR) (see Box 1). The policy recommendations below not only propose the measures that we regard as necessary but also take into account the political and economic costs involved in the transition from the current inadequately functioning system to a more sustainable and functional one.
A multicurrency reserve system for a multipolar world economy 1.1 Develop a multicurrency reserve system that is appropriate for a world of regional trading blocs – Europe, Asia, the Americas – alongside a still preeminent dollar. The disadvantage of losing network externalities would be compensated by gaining stability. Historical experience has shown that two or more reserve currencies can operate simultaneously. 1.2 Encourage a more extensive use of Special Drawing Rights as a supranational currency alongside international reserve currencies that are issued by sovereign states or by sovereign states pooled together in a currency union, as is the case for the euro. 1.3 Promote cross-border dialogue and policy cooperation in order to manage the transition from a system based on the dollar to a multicurrency one. Institutional arrangements should be strengthened, with a clear mandate to avoid major imbalances.
2. Increase the use of the Special Drawing Rights 2.1 Expand the supply of SDRs in a frequent, predictable and politically independent way, so as to increase the existing stock at least in line with world GDP, gradually reducing the accumulation of dollars. 2.2 Establish a new committee (the ‘International Monetary Policy Committee’) to produce regular recommendations to the IMF board for new SDR allocations. The constitution of such a committee should be designed to ensure that its decisions are independent and fair. It might be chaired by the IMF managing director and composed of the heads of the central banks (All Rothschild´s minions) whose currencies make up the SDR, along with independent experts to allow independent decision-making on changes to the composition of the basket of currencies in the SDRs. 2.3 Establish a substitution account under the IMF into which member countries can deposit dollars, euros, yen or sterling, and receive the equivalent amount in SDRs in their account based on the exchange rate then prevailing. The size of this account should be limited initially and increased gradually, as experience is gained of its use by member countries and of the pattern of deposits and redemptions. Initially the substitution account might allow only one-way transfers, but it should work towards allowing both purchases and redemptions. 2.4 Take steps to increase the use of and demand for SDRs, beyond official circles, in international trade and finance: 2.4.1 The IMF should permit SDR accounts to be opened by private-sector actors. 2.4.2 The IMF or another suitable provider should create a settlement system, so that transactions denominated in SDRs can take place directly between buyers and sellers on a secure and transparentplatform. 2.4.3 The development of SDR-denominated financial instruments and markets in which to trade them should be encouraged. In particular there needs to be a market-maker willing to buy and sell SDR bonds at bid/offer spreads that are competitive vis-à-vis those in existing bond markets. These measures would greatly strengthen confidence in the liquidity of SDRs (i.e. their marketability, acceptability by all countries, convertibility to the dollar and other currencies, and use as a unit of account and settlement for oil and other commodities).
3. Promote dialogue and policy coordination to provide stability, confidence and balanced adjustment 3.1 Foster greater efforts in the peer monitoring and assessment of the full range of economic policies that impinge on countries’ balance of payments and exchange rates. 3.2 Encourage international dialogue between countries issuing a reference currency and individual or groups of countries using the reference currency. Consultation would pre-specify credible actions that would be taken in the case of growing imbalances and required change in reference currencies.
4. Strengthen the role and legitimacy of international institutions 4.1 Rebalance subscriptions to and voting rights within the IMF more rapidly and more radically than is currently taking place. These changes are needed to improve governance of, and increase international confidence in, the IMF. They are important in paving the way to wider use of SDRs. Without them the IMF risks becoming marginalized as an agent of a group of countries with a dwindling global presence. Following the reweighting of the voting rights, the composition of the Executive Board should also be rebalanced. 4.2 Strengthen the IMF’s ‘score-keeping’ capacity by allowing it to issue its own quarterly reports on exchange rate and other relevant policies. These would help in the evaluation of the full range of economic policies that affect exchange rates and the balance of payments, and establish a set of benchmarks against which countries’ actual policies and policy commitments could be assessed. The IMF would thereby become more vigorously engaged in ‘naming and shaming’. Both the management and the board must adjust the incentives for the staff to raise sensitive issues. IMF management, rather than the board, should have the authority to approve such surveillance reports, to further insulate the staff from political pressures. 4.3 Mandate the IMF to deal with currency misalignments and promote monetary coordination, or establish an institution for this purpose. Such an institution could start as a caucus of the countries issuing the reserve currencies – the United States, the Eurozone, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and Japan – and also include countries with the largest accumulation of reserves. This institution should eventually fulfil the function in terms of international monetary affairs that the World Trade Organization does for international trade.
The SDR is not a currency but a basket of currencies currently comprising the dollar, the Japanese yen, the euro and the pound sterling. The relative weights of these currencies are adjusted every five years. The next adjustment will take place in 2010. There have been only four allocations of SDRs made thus far. The last two allocations of 161.2 billion and 21.5 billion were made in August 2009 and September 2009 respectively. The total amount of SDRs is currently 204.1 billion. These SDRs are distributed to the IMF member states in accordance with quotas that are largely decided by the size of their economy and its openness. The quota determines each member’s voting power in the IMF and its access to IMF funding as well as its financial obligations to the IMF. Wikipedia: “SDRs obtain their reserve asset power from the commitments of the IMF member states to hold and honor them for payment of balances”
Comment Now, as stated above this is a summary of well-known suggestions from the UNEP and the technocrats. Their world currency consists of equal quotas of thin air (CO2) allocated to every person on earth. When you have used your allocation you go broke. You cannot make savings. Barroso 4. febr. 2010: The Copenhagen Accord might not be all that we hoped for. But it is a significant step on the road to a low carbon future. In the end, we will get there. No matter science, no matter the exposures of global warming science as fraud, The New World Order is building our future on thin air and lies. The devil is really at large in the NWO, for the NWO is his order. Rothschild minion George Soros advocates SDRs as world currency, too. In April 2009 , Downing Street 10 affirmed on behalf of the G20 that the IMF was to be endowed with 250 bn dollars of new SDR allocations. This automatically means more inflation, i.e. theft of the value of our money. The remarkable thing is that the Master of the New World Order, The Rothschild Club, the Chatham House, comes into the open, stamping this one-world inititiative as its policy. That China, Russia and the Gulf states are dissatisfied with the dollar as the world´s only reserve currency and have started efforts to replace became clear last fall. The UNCTAD also wants a new world reserve currency, preferably the SDRs. So instead of gold standard, we are going to have a currency based on – nothing, except the New World order elite´s gracious grants to us subhumans. Did you believe, you could buy a little gold to secure yourself? Oh no. Your gold either consists of Tungsten covered with a thin layer of gold – or your gold certificate is just 1% worth its face value. Well, they are robbing you of your money, anyway, viz. as CO2 taxes.
Skolnick / Rense Several goldmines, suffering from
disastrously low gold prices, are considering accusing
the Federal Reserve and others, including known
international criminals such as Marc Rich, of a
diabolical scheme to prop up six huge failing hedge
funds by way of attempting to head off a worldwide
Described by some as high-cost producers, the mines are reportedly considering publicizing their plight, to rescue themselves from the artificial situation created by what they contend is the pricing of gold below the cost of production of even the world's most efficient mines. If public awareness does not defeat the anti-gold plot, the mines only recourse is to have British interests take over at lead mine prices, just short of bankruptcy.
Among those reportedly complaining are Homestake Mines, South Dakota and California, as well as several deep-in-the-earth South African mines. Some Third World mines are accusing the Anti-Gold cabal of racist policies, designed to impoverish countries populated by people of color. Some in the Johannesburg government are expected to spearhead the finger-pointing.
The plot to force down the price of the yellow metal, the mines say, revolves around a little-known term called the "gold carry" trade. A low price of gold enables some Wall Street marauders to make huge profits by being able to use such prices as a vehicle to get loans for as little as one per cent. The mines contend that some in their own industry, to the detriment of their own stockholders, are going along with the anti-gold tricks. Among those accused is American Barrick, principal players of which include George Herbert Walker Bush and sons George W., Neil, and Jeb. Some have accused Barrick of being a proprietary operation of the American CIA and the National Security Agency, using untraceable gold as funding for the overthrow of governments and the assassination of leaders, U.S. and overseas. Alleged "President" George W. Bush, heckled by critics as an "imposter" and usurper, shortly after grabbing power, has cancelled the Carter Administration's Presidential edict banning the U.S. from engaging in political assassinations to carry out some national or international policy. Implicit in the political murder go-ahead is funding of the same with secret gold.
The Federal Reserve, together with Wall Street investment thugs Goldman Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan, joined by the "metal men" of international pirate Marc Rich and his rogues, are reportedly accused of being part of the Anti-Gold Cartel devoted to attempting to bail out six monstrous hedge funds, the eminent collapse of which threatens the viability of the New York Stock Exchange as well as the possible existence of NASDAQ. In plain terms, the stricken mines are accusing the Fed and their cut-throats of propping up hedge funds whose would-be wizards completely guessed wrong in their gambling on complex markets known generally as derivatives.
Without the gold hocus-pocus, the failure of the hedge funds may cause the eventual closing for a time of Big Board [Or is it Big Bird?] trading as well as other markets, according to mining sources. They contend that exchange clearing houses may also as a result fail. To head off the expected financial debacle, escalating the recession into a headlong wreckage, they contend, the Federal Reserve has joined even with known criminals in Switzerland and the Russian mafiya.
With the downfall of the Soviet government, aided by his complicity in the attack on the Russian currency, the Ruble, about 1990, Marc Rich arranged with former top officials of the Soviet Secret Police to steal a large portion of the Soviet gold treasury. At the time, the Soviets were one of the world's largest gold producers. New purported users of the precious metal horde as a bartering device have been the Dutch banking octopus, Algemene Bank Nederland, now called ABN-AMRO. Quantities of the purloined gold have been parked at or near a Swiss airport for rapid transit to any point on the planet, as needed. The U.S. flagship of ABN, La Salle National Bank of Chicago, used the plundered gold as collateral to quietly buy up shaky banks in 15 major U.S. cities. One of only two U.S. banks refusing to disclose their true ownership to a Congressional Committee, La Salle has long been the place for corrupt public officials, primarily judges, to have numbered and secret accounts to whisk their bribery assets offshore.
Head of the paper money rapists and the center of anti-gold banditry has been the Bank of England. Historically experienced criminals, the bank covered up the role of the huge British/French/U.S./Israeli espionage and political murder money laundry, Bank of Credit and Commerce International, BCCI. As we have earlier pointed out, the Bank of England, at the time of the purported collapse of BCCI in 1991, for 30 days mysteriously had, as an open record, the BCCI bribery list, proving BCCI had bought or blackmailed one-fourth of all the members of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. Only a populist newspaper, SPOTLIGHT, headquartered in the District of Columbia, ran my exclusive story of the bribery and blackmail of Congress. Although as part of my story I supplied the list of names, the weekly outspoken newspaper ran my story verbatim minus the list, as a precaution. Contrary to mass media slanted reporting, BCCI did NOT disappear but re-emerged as a joint operation with the First National Bank of Cicero, located in the mafia enclave adjoining Chicago; the bank having been under the domination of Bishop Paul Marcinkkus,long head of the CIA/Mafia-linked Vatican Bank. [Visit our website for related stories, such as the Giannini Family and the bank in Cicero.]
To connive with major gold bullion looters like Goldman Sachs, the Bank of England set about to force down the price of gold by periodic supposed auctions of the bank's gold. Actually, most of the time the British bank underworld offered gold it did NOT physically have or want to sell. Called by some the BUNK of England, they were secretly offering at "auction", portions of the stolen Soviet gold treasury, leased or "loaned" by Dutch receivers of stolen goods,to the British fakers for appearing to flood the market with gold. Interesting sidenote: currency speculators know it is a "death warrant" to mess over the Dutch currency, the Guilder.
Operating an NSA/CIA clandestine gold bullion bank in the Caribbean for many years was Hillary Rodham Clinton's confederate Vincent W. Foster, Jr. Foster became knowledgeable about how George Herbert Walker Bush and Bill Clinton wanted to stop FBI Director William Sessions from seizing Marc Rich in 1993 near the Swiss-French border, to return the international swindler for U.S.criminal prosecution. [See our prior website story about Marc Rich fingered by a letter.] As a consequence, Marc Rich came up with 5 million dollars, siphoned off of the gold poaching, to pay for a private murder team to snuff out Foster shortly after the failed attempt by the Foster team to grab Marc Rich. The wipe-out was falsely promoted as a "suicide" by intelligence agency "assets" in the monopoly press. [Background details on the murder of Foster, see our website story "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush", Part Four.]
Much later, hundreds of pages, many heavily redacted, under a Freedom of Information demand, were released about Foster by the National Security Agency, relating, for example, to his espionage work against banks worldwide.
As covered up by highly corrupt top officials of the American Gestapo, the FBI and the IRS, Marc Rich and his pillagers have joined in crime with fellow currency and commodity hijackers on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. In March, 2001, alleged "President"Bush came to Chicago to give a speech to the Merc. Some considered his presence as delivering them a message. That as the fountain of criminal money that they are, he expects them to help finance and carry out some of the schemes of his family. The FBI and the IRS top officials are well aware of the widespread federal regulation violations by many members of the Merc as well as the Chicago Board of Trade. Brokers are reportedly not keeping clients' funds in segregated accounts, as required by law. In case of a financial debacle, the brokers AND THEIR CLIENTS will be in the same sinking boat.
Run by the Jewish aristocracy, not the common people of that ethnic-religious group, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange is an exclusive place for high-stakes gambling. They switched their allegiance from Bill Clinton to George W. Bush. Like Bush, Clinton when president likewise came to the Merc to give them a message to kick in funds for his schemes. On the same day George W. was in Chicago, he also visited the Chicago Board of Trade which was not interested in his messages. The Board of Trade is run by the Irish Catholic aristocracy, not the common people, and they understand the Bush Family are agents of the British Monarchy, that perpetrated the Irish Holocaust of the middle 19th Century, falsely described by the pro-British American media as merely a "Potato Famine". Members of the Board of Trade, always tight with the Vatican and the Rothschilds, blocked Bush's attempts at a shake-down.
Clinton came to the Merc to get big money and his marching orders. Like him, Clinton crony George W. Bush does the same. Nevertheless, honchos of both the Merc and the Board of Trade do understand they cannot openly oppose the orchestrated events of the Federal Reserve and the paper money crowd. After all, the Fed has demanded co-operation from a series of criminal residents as "President" in the White House. Both exchanges know the widespread failure to keep clients' accounts segregated could set off a wave of federal criminal prosecutions by the Injustice Department, perhaps even closing both exchanges.
Some of the supposedly "segregated accounts" have been unlawfully commingled with clandestine funds of the Russian mafiya with the connivance of Marc Rich and his mob; and interwoven with the funds of the Red Chinese Secret Police, with the reported complicity of not only Marc Rich but his accomplice, Rahm Emanuel, former Clinton White House Senior Advisor, and more currently, Managing Director of Wasserstein Perella & Co., reputed Asian money laundry front. Rahm is the reputed Deputy Chief of Israeli Intelligence, The Mossad, for North America.
Currency and commodity brokers handling the dirty anti-Gold transactions are warned if there is about to be public exposure of dealings not done with what is known in the industry as "due diligence", that is, knowing actually who the broker is dealing with. Apparently "for a piece of the action", corrupt top FBI and IRS officials, Chicago and New York, quietly alert favored brokers to "problems" that might subject the brokers to federal criminal prosecution. Why do the mass media honchos mostly remain silent? Because some reporters of Establishment magazines, radio and television programs, are busy during the day, on the phone to their brokers, London, Singapore, Frankfort, trading on inside information for themselves and their relatives. The Chicago Board of Trade resisted the Bush White House shake-down. The Chicago Mercantile Exchange caved in to the extortion.
Some gold mines are getting clipped. Their goods, and instruments for or against their goods, are secretly transacted on the Chicago markets.Maybe THEY should buy the White House. Cynics cackle, a man named Rich is helping make gold mines Poor. All to benefit the paper money pimps and to rescue hedge fund swindlers.
|Clinton's donors raise all kinds of red flags on the
confirmation of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.
Among the most egregious donors is the private military contractor Blackwater USA. Mrs. Clinton's most obvious conflict-of-interest is next year when Blackwater's State Department contract comes up for renewal. Knowing the ways of the Clintons, it is not hard to see a quid pro quo between a Secretary of State Clinton and the very Republican and very right-wing Blackwater in the offing.
A spokesman for the Obama transition team had the audacity to claim that donations to the Clinton Foundation have no bearing on Clinton's job as Secretary of State. Oh, really? Have the Obama people ever heard of Jackson Stephens of Little Rock's Stephens, Inc.? The Clintons and conflicts-of-interest go together like peanut butter and jelly.
One of the most astounding Clinton donors is the Alavi Foundation. Alavi is the co-owner of a 36-story building on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. On December 17, federal officials charged that Alavi's co-owner, Assa Corporation, is a front for Iran's Bank Melli that funneled revenue from the building to Bank Melli via a front company in the Channel Islands. Hillary Clinton has been a hawk on Iran and once suggested that she would launch a devastating military attack on the country. Apparently, the Clintons are not so hawkish when it comes to taking Iranian money in a "pay-to-play" enterprise that would make Blagojevich and Rahm Emanuel (also a Clinton donor) envious.
Bill Clinton certainly was a busy man as a globe-trotting panhandler. He managed to get donations from a number of foreign governments, including Saudi Arbia, Norway, Oman, Brunei, Kuwait, Qatar, Australia, Jamaica, Ireland, Taiwan, Italy, and the Canary Islands' Tenerife island government. Other foreign donors include the Netherlands National Postal Lottery, Swiss Reinsurance Company, the Swedish Postal Lottery, China Overseas Real Estate Development, Venezuela's Venevision TV network, Credit Suisse, National Opera of Paris, South Africa's African Rainbow Minerals, Bahrain Petroleum, Beirut Container Terminal Consortium, De Beers Marine Namibia, National Bank of Kuwait, Taiwan Mobile Foundation, Baltic International Bank, Booz Allen Hamilton, BNP Paribas, Jordan Investment Trust, Kenya Commercial Bank, New Zealand Stock Exchange, Newmont Mining Corp. (major gold mining compamy), Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Palestine Telecommunication Company, Portugal Telecom, Reykjavik Energy, Society Tourism Diversions of Macau, Taipei Fubon Commercial Bank Co Ltd., TD Bank Financial Group, De Beers Family of Companies, Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. of Israel, First Philippine Holdings Corporation, International Bank of Commerce of Laredo, Texas, Oppenheimer Funds, Inc., Hutchison Whampoa Limited,PT. Polychem Indonesia, Neptune Orient Lines Ltd. (Singapore), Morgan Stanley Asia Limited, and UBS Wealth Management.
Another major donors is Clinton Foundation trustee Frank Giustra, a Canadian billionaire who made a windfall profit in 2006 after landing a huge uranium contract from Kazakhstan's authoritarian President Nursultan Nazarbayev with Bill Clinton's help.
Haim Saban, the Israeli-American entertainment guru who supports Israeli interests over those of his adopted country, was also a multi-million dollar donor to Clinton's non-profit contrivance.
Other major donors are Saudi construction billionaire Nasser al-Rashid; Dubai Emir Mohammad Rashid bin Maktoum, the majority owner of Dubai Ports World; Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese Christian billionaire with sizable investments in oil-rich Nigeria; the Zayed ruling family of Abu Dhabi; Jordanian-Canadian Victor Dahdaleh, chief of Dadco Group, who was once accused in a lawsuit of bribing Bahrain officials on behalf of Alcoa and using front companies in the British Virgin Islands, Singapore, and Switzerland; Lebanese Houston-based Issam Fares, a former Lebanese Deputy Prime Minister; Indian mining mogul Lakshmi Mittal, aka "Taj Mittal," who has been accused of running slave labor mines in places like Kazakhstan; Ukrainian Jewish mining oligarch Viktor Pinchuk; former Loral Chairman Bernard Schwartz, who was investigated for the transfer of sensitive missile technology to China; URS Corporation's Richard Blum, the Iraq war profiteer husband of incoming Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA); Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation Foundation; Little Rock billionaire and longtime Clinton financial supporter Jackson Stephens; personal data mining giant Acxiom Inc,; scandal-plagued American International Group (AIG); Denise Rich, the ex-wife of American-Swiss-Israeli billionaire fugitive Marc Rich; Mexican telecommunications baron Carlos Slim Helu; former AES CEO and secretive Arlington-based Fellowship Foundation supporter Dennis Bakke; Barrick Gold, whose international advisers have included Bill Clinton's golfing buddy George H. W. Bush; Israel supporter Edgard Bronfman; Lynn F. de Rothschild; sub prime mortgage perpetrator Merrill Lynch; Brazilian Jewish banking billionaire Joseph Safra of Safra Group; right-wing political funder Richard Mellon Scaife; the American Jewish Committee; the University of Judaism; Iranian expatriate Farhad Azima, a longtime provider of air services to U.S. intelligence agencies; Wall Street collapse perpetrator Goldman Sachs; Banque Privee Edmond De Rothschild; Evelyn de Rothschild; Lazare Kaplan International Inc.; Rahm Emanuel, Lafarge Corporation (where Hillary Clinton once served as a director during a time when the firm was implicated in the shipment of restricted materials to Saddam Hussein); The Chatterjee Group (which is linked to Marvin Bush, brother of George W. Bush); Wesley K. Clark and Associates; Albanian-American Center for Information and Cooperation, and World Vision.
Another donor was Citigroup and its Citi Foundation. Citigroup is one of the recipients of the U.S. government's nearly $1 trillion bailout of Wall Street. No conflict-of-interest there Mr. and Mrs. Clinton?
Another donor is Mohammed Hussein al-Amoudi, a Saudi-Ethiopian billionaire who once threatened a libel lawsuit against this editor unless more than $100,000 was deposited in his foreign bank account. The attempted shakedown by this dubious individual was reported to the FBI. Another donor is Jordanian-American businessman A. Huda Farouki, Nour USA and Erinys Iraq majordomo who, like al-Amoudi, once threatened a libel lawsuit against this editor.
George Soros' Open Society Institute and the Soros Foundation, which fund "themed" neocon revolutions and destabilizing political chicanery around the world, also kicked into the Clinton Foundation.
The Friends of Saudi Arabia, Saudi billionaire businessman Walid Juffali, the U.S. Islamic World Conference, and Saudi construction mogul Hamza al Kholi are among Clinton's donors.
With a donation from the First Bank of Nigeria and Nigeria's Intercontinental Bank Plc, as well as Nigeria's Obat Oil And Petroleum Limited, the Clintons may be the first successful recipients of Nigerian "419" money. Congratulations Bill and Hillary!
Bill's global panhandling is a disgrace to the United States. Obama's selection of the other half of Clinton & Clinton, Inc. as Secretary of State is also a disgrace. Hillary Clinton is unsuitable to be Secretary of State since she and her husband are walking and talking conflicts-of-interest. "The List" proves that they are nothing more than political prostitutes of the Nth degree.
|Peter Orszag go to timeline Emanuel|
|Solving 9/11 So, who is Peter Richard Orszag and what kind of decisions will he make with the budget he controls? Based on his background one would be well advised to prepare for a financial train wreck. Peter Orszag has an interesting resume. He has played key roles in some of the biggest financial scandals of our time. Orszag was, for example, an advisor to the Russian Finance Ministry during the reign of the Jewish oligarchs as they plundered the wealth of Russia. He was an advisor to the Central Bank of Iceland before it crashed in 2008. During the Clinton administration, Orszag was an advisor to Rahm Emanuel and Bill Clinton on the disastrous NAFTA bill that has devastated the U.S. manufacturing sector. Oddly, Orszag's background has received virtually no attention in the media. He has a troubling background, which deserves to be looked at very carefully. Orszag, for example, should start by explaining exactly what happened to the Icelandic economy. Orszag was, after all, the founder and president of the economic consultancy firm which advised the Central Bank of Iceland - before it went bankrupt. How did Icelandic banks become so indebted? Ask Peter Orszag. Orszag is an economist who served six years in the Clinton administration (1993-98) under Robert E. Rubin, the former treasury secretary who recently resigned from his senior position at the woefully mismanaged and nearly bankrupt Citigroup. The fact that Orszag was a protégé of the now disgraced Rubin certainly does not bode well for the Obama administration. Rubin strongly opposed the regulation of derivatives when such regulation was proposed in 1997. Credit derivatives of mortgage-backed securities were the key reason for the recent failure of a number of large financial institutions, including AIG and Citigroup. In 1999, Rubin joined Citigroup as a board member and a participant "in strategic managerial and operational matters of the company." The Wall Street Journal noted that Citigroup shareholders suffered losses of more than 70 percent since Rubin joined the firm and that he encouraged changes that led the firm to the brink of collapse. In December 2008, investors filed a lawsuit contending that Citigroup executives, including Rubin, sold shares at inflated prices while concealing the firm's risks. Orszag, a Jew, served on the president's Council of Economic Advisers in 1993, under Rubin, when the Israeli Rahm Emanuel,Clinton's senior adviser, was pushing the disastrous NAFTA legislation through Congress. Prior to joining the Clinton team, Orszag was an economic adviser for the Russian Ministry of Finance in Moscow from 1992-93. This was a period of rampant financial criminality during which many Russian mineral assets came under the control of the so-called Jewish oligarchs who became instant billionaires. Most of these oligarchs fled Russia when their crimes were exposed and now live in Britain or Israel, where they obtained citizenship. Born in Boston on December 16, 1968, Orszag graduated from Princeton University in 1991. He then attended the London School of Economics, where he earned a degree in 1992 and where he obtained his PhD in 1997. The London School of Economics was established by members of the Fabian Society, who believed in advancing socialism through gradual reforms. The Fabian Society is a British socialist movement, whose purpose is to advance the principles of social democracy via gradualist and reformist, rather than revolutionary means. The ideology of the Fabians is said to be described in the quote, "Fabianism feeds on Capitalism, but excretes Communism." In 1998, after serving in the Clinton administration, Orszag co-founded an economic consulting group company with his brother and Joseph Stiglitz called Sebago Associates, where he served as president through 2007. The firm's clients have included the World Bank, the Nordic Council of Ministers, and most notably, the Central Bank of Iceland. The once prosperous economy of Iceland has been devastated by the current economic crisis, which its citizens say was carried out by a gang of financial criminals who followed disastrous policies and advice - provided by Peter Orszag and Company. Americans would be well advised to be extremely vigilant with dangerous "Young Turks" like Peter Orszag and Rahm Emanuel running the Obama White House and the U.S. budget.|
|AIDS Czar: Jeffrey Crowley Homosexual. A Gay Rights
activist. Believes in Gay Marriage and Special Status,
including free health care for gays.
Auto recovery Czar: Ed Montgomery- Radical anti business activist. Affirmative Action and Job Preference for blacks. Univ of Maryland Business School Dean teaches US business has caused world poverty. ACORN board member. Communist DuBois Club member.
Border Czar: Alan Bersin - former failed superintendent of San Diego. Ultra Liberal friend of Hilary Clinton. Served as Border Czar under Janet Reno to keep borders open to illegals.
California Water Czar: David J. Hayes Sr. Fellow of radical environmentalist group, “Progress Policy”. No training or experience in water management.
Car Czar: Ron Bloom- Auto Union worker. Anti business & anti nuclear. Has worked hard to force US auto makers out of business. Sits on the Board of Chrysler which is now Auto Union owned. How did this happen?
Central Region Czar: Dennis Ross- Believes US policy has caused Mid-East wars. Obama apologist to the world. Anti gun and pro abortion.
Domestic Violence Czar: Lynn Rosenthal- Director of the National Network to End Domestic Violence. Vicious anti male feminist. Supported male castration.
Drug Czar:Gil Kerlikowske- devoted lobbyist for every restrictive gun law proposal, Former Chief of Police in Liberal Seattle. Believes no American should own a firearm. Supports legalization of drugs.
Economic Czar: Paul Volcker -Head of Fed Reserve under Jimmy Carter when US economy nearly failed. Obama appointed head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board which engineered the Obama economic disaster to US economy. Member of anti business “Progressive Policy” organization.
Energy and Environment Czar: Carol Brower- Political Radical-Former head of EPA -- known for anti-business activism. Strong anti-gun ownership.
Faith-Based Czar: Joshua DuBois Political Black activist - Degree in Black Nationalism—seek a separate black nation. Anti gun ownership lobbyist.
Great Lakes Czar: Cameron Davis- Chicago radical anti-business environmentalist. Blames George Bush for “Poisoning the water that minorities have to drink.” No experience or training in water management. Former ACORN Board member
Green Jobs Czar: Van Jones- Black activist Member of American communist Party and San Francisco Communist Party who said Geo Bush caused the 911 attack and wanted Bush investigated by the World Court for war crimes. MARXIST, said whites are poisoning blacks, said transformation from “suicidal gray capitalism to econ-capitalism to the complete redistribution of wealth.” Black activist with strong anti-white views. (since resigned but still hiding under Obama’s bed).
Guantanamo Closure Czar: Daniel Fried Rights activist for Foreign Terrorists. Believes America has caused the war on terrorism.
Health Czar: Nancy-Ann DeParle. Former head of Medicare / Medicaid. Strong Health Care Rationing proponent. She is married to a reporter for The New York Times.
Information Czar: Vivek Kundra- born in New Delhi, India. Controls all public information, including labels and news releases. Monitors all private Internet emails.
International Climate Czar: Todd Stern- Anti business former White House chief of Staff- Strong supporter of the Kyoto Accord. Pushing hard for Cap and Trade. Blames US business for Global warming.
Intelligence Czar: Dennis Blair- Ret Navy. Stopped US guided missile program as “provocative”. Chair of ultra liberal “Council on Foreign Relations” which blames American organizations for regional wars.
Mideast Peace Czar: George Mitchell Fmr. Sen from Maine- Left wing radical. Has said Israel should be split up into “2 or 3 “ smaller more manageable plots”. Anti-nuclear anti-gun & pro-homosexual.
Pay Czar: Kenneth Feinberg- Chief of Staff to TED KENNEDY. Lawyer who got rich off the 911 victims payoffs.
Regulatory Czar: Cass Sunstein- Liberal activist judge-believes free speech needs to be limited for the “common good”. Rules against personal freedoms many times like private gun ownership. Believes animals should have lawyers.
Safe School Czar: Kevin Jennings -- As a teacher when a 15 year old said he was having sex with an older man, instead of turning in the man—the law for a teacher, he asked how it was going and suggested they use condoms. Held a conference with the MAXIMUM age of 18 to teach homosexual issues like “fisting.” Wrote the intro to the book, “Queering Elementary Education.” Has repeatedly praised and claims to be inspired by Harry Hay, early supporter of NAMBLA, (North American Man Boy Love Association).
Science Czar: John Holdren - Fierce ideological environmentalist, Sierra Club, Anti business activist. Claims US business has caused world poverty. No Science training. John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet
Stimulus Accountability Czar: Earl Devaney- spent career trying to take guns away from American citizens. Believes in Open Borders to Mexico . Author of statement blaming US gun stores for drug war in Mexico
Sudan Czar: J. Scott Gration- Native of Democratic Republic of Congo. Believes US does little to help Third World countries. Council of foreign relations, asking for higher US taxes to support United Nations.
TARP Czar: Herb Allison- Fannie May CEO responsible for the US recession by using real estate mortgages to back up the US stock market. Caused millions of people to lose their life savings.
Terrorism Czar: John Brennan- Anti CIA activist. No training in diplomatic or gov. affairs. Believes Open Borders to Mexico and a dialog with terrorists and has suggested Obama disband US military.
Technology Czar: Aneesh Chopra- NoTechnology training. Worked for the Advisory Board Company, a healthcare think tank for hospitals. Anti doctor activist. Supports Obama Health care Rationing and salaried doctors working exclusively for the Gov. health care plan.
Urban Affairs Czar: Adolfo Carrion, Jr.-Puerto Rican. Anti American activist and leftist group member in Latin America . Millionaire “slum lord” of the Bronx, NY. Owns many lavish homes and condos which he got from “sweetheart” deals with labor unions. Wants higher taxes to pay for minority housing and health care.
Weapons Czar: Ashton Carter- Leftist. Wants all private weapons in US destroyed. Supports UN ban on firearms ownership in America. No Other “policy”
WMD Policy Czar: Gary Samore- Former US Communist. Wants US to destroy all WMD unilaterally as a show of good faith. Has no other “policy”.
|The Trilateral Commission: North American Group 2008 TRILATERAL COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE|
|Thomas S. Foley North American Chairman Peter
Sutherland European Chairman Yotaro Kobayashi Pacific
Asia Chairman Allan E. Gotlieb North American Deputy
Chairman Herve De Carmoy European Deputy Chairman Han
Sung-Joo Pacific Asia Deputy Chairman Lorenzo H.
Zamibrano North American Deputy Chairman Ainijrzej
Olechowski European Deputy Chairman Shijuro Ogata
Pacific Asia Deputy Chairman David Rockefeller Founder
And Honorary Chairman Paul A. Volcker North American
Honorary Chairman Georges Berthoin Chairman European
Honorary Otto Graf Lambsdorf European Honorary Chairman
Michael J. O’Neil North American Director Paul Revay
European Director Tadashi Yamamoto Pacific Asia Director
NORTH AMERICAN GROUP
Madeleine K Albright The Albright Group LLC Washington, D.C. Graham Allison Kennedy School of Government, Harvard Cambridge, Mass. Richard L. Armitage Armitage International Washington, D.C. James L. Balsillie Co-Chief Exec. Officer, Research in Motion Waterloo, Ontario Charlene Barshefsky Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering Washington, D.C. Alan R. Batkin Eton Park Capital Management New York, N.Y. Lael Brainard The Brookings Institution Washington, D.C. Doug Bereuter The Asia Foundation San Francisco. C. Fred Bergsten Peterson Institute for Int’l Economics Washington, D.C. Catherine Bertini Syracuse University Syracuse, N.Y. Robert D. Blackwill Former Deputy Asst, to the President Washington D.C. Dennis Blair, USN (Ret.) Institute for Defense Analyses Alexandria, Va. H. Blanco Mendoza Private Office of Herminio Blanco Mexico City Stephen W. Bosworth Dean, Tufts University Medford, Mass. David G. Bradley Atlantic Media Company Washington, D.C. Harold Brown Center for Strategic and Int’l Studies Washington, D.C. Zbigniew Brzezinski Center for Strategic and Int’l Studies Washington, D.C. Sylvia Mathews Burwell President Global Development Program Hinton, WV Louis C. Camilleri Altria Group, Inc New York, N.Y. Kurt Campbell CEO Center New American Security Washington, D.C. Raymond Chrétien Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP Montreal, Quebec William T. Coleman III Cassatt Corporation San Jose, Calif. Timothy C. Collins Ripplewood Holdings New York, N.Y. Richard N. Cooper Harvard University Cambridge, Mass. F. Gerald Corrigan Goldman, Sachs & Co. New York, N.Y. Michael J. Critelli Pitney Bowes Inc. Stamford, Conn. Lee Cullum “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer,” Dallas, Texas H. Lawrence Culp, Jr CEO of Danaher Washington, D.C. Gerald L. Curtis Columbia University New York, N.Y. Douglas Daft The Coca Cola Company Atlanta, Ga. Lynn Davis The RAND Corporation Arlington, Va. Arthur A. DeFehr Palliser Furniture Winnipeg André Desmarais Power Corporation of Canada Montréal, Quebec John M. Deutch Mass. Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. Jamie Dimon JP Morgan Chase & Co. New York, N.Y. Peter C. Dobell Parliamentary Centre Ottawa, Ontario Wendy K Dobson University of Toronto Toronto Kenneth M. Duberstein The Duberstein Group Washington, D.C. Robert Eckert Mattel, Inc. El Segundo, Calif. Jessica P. Einhorn The Johns Hopkins University Washington, D.C. Jeffrey Epstein J. Epstein & Company, Inc. New York, N.Y. Dianne Feinstein U.S. Senate (D-Calif.) Washington, D.C. Martin S. Feldstein Harvard University Cambridge, Mass. Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. Swiss Re America Holding Corp. Washington, D.C. Stanley Fischer Bank of Israel; frmr president, Citigroup New York, N.Y. Richard W. Fisher Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Dallas, Texas Thomas S. Foley Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Washington, D.C. Kristin J. Forbes Associate Prof. of Int’l Management Cambridge Mass. Michael B.G. Froman Citigroup Inc. New York, N.Y. Francis Fukuyama The Johns Hopkins University Washington, D.C. Dionisio Garza Medina ALFA Mexico Richard A. Gephardt Former member House of Reps. (D-Mo.) Washington, D.C. David Gergen Harvard; Editor, USN&WR Cambridge, Mass. Peter C. Godsoe Scotiabank (ret.) Toronto, Ontario Allan E. Gotlieb Bennett Jones LLP Toronto, Ontario Bill Graham Canadian House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario Donald E. Graham CEO of The Washington Post Company Washington, D.C. Jeffrey W. Greenberg Aquiline Capital Partners, LLC New York, N.Y. Richard N. Haass President, Council on Foreign Relations New York, N.Y. James T. Hackett Anadarko Petroleum Corp. Texas John J. Hamre Center for Strategic and Int’l Studies Washington, D.C. William A. Haseltine Haseltine Global Health, LLC Washington, D.C. Richard F. Haskayne University of Calgary Alberta Charles B. Heck Senior Adviser, Trilateral Commission Washington, D.C. Carlos Heredia International Affairs Mexico Carla A. Hills Hills & Company, Int’l Consultants Washington, D.C. Richard Holbrooke Perseus LLC New York, N.Y. Karen Elliott House Dow Jones & Co. & Wall Street Journal Princeton, N.J. Alej. Junco de la Vega Grupo Reforma Monterrey, Mexico Robert Kagan Carnegie Endowment for Int’l Peace Washington, D.C. Arnold Kanter The Scowcroft Group Washington, D.C. Charles R. Kaye Warburg Pincus LLC New York, N.Y. James Kimsey Founding CEO of AOL Washington, D.C. Michael Klein Citigroup Inc. New York, N.Y. Steven E. Koonin British Petroleum London Enrique Krauze Editorial Clio Libros y Videos, S.A. de C.V. Mexico City Robert Lane Deere & Company Moline, Ill. Fred Langhammer The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. New York, N.Y. Jim Leach Former U.S. Representative (R-IA) Washington, D.C. Gerald M. Levin AOL Time Warner, Inc. New York, N.Y. Winston Lord International Rescue Committee New York, N.Y. E. Peter Lougheed Bennett Jones, Banisters & Solicitors Calgary, Alberta Roy MacLaren Former High Commissioner to the UK Toronto, Ontario John A. MacNaughton Frmr CEO Canada Pension Plan Invest. Brd Toronto, Ontario Antonio Madero San Luis Corporacion, S.A. de C.V. Mexico John Manley McCarthy Tétrault LLP Ottawa, Ontario Sir Deryck C. Maughan KKR Asia, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. New York, N.Y. Jay Mazur Union of Needletrades, Textile Employees New York, N.Y. James Moore Canadian Parliament Ottawa, Ontario Marc H. Morial National Urban League New York, N.Y. Heather Munroe-Blum McGill University Montreal, Quebed Brian Mulroney Ogilvy Renault Montréal, Quebec Indra K. Nooyi PepsiCo, Inc. Purchase, N.Y. Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard Cambridge, Mass. David J. O’Reilly Chevron Corporation San Ramon, Calif. Meghan O’Sullivan Former Deputy National Security Adviser Washington, D.C. Richard N. Perle American Enterprise Institute Washington, D.C. Thomas R. Pickering Consultant, The Boeing Company Arlington, Va. Martha C. Piper The University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C. Richard Plepler Executive Vice President, HBO New York, N.Y. Joe Ralston, USAF (Ret) The Cohen Group Washington, D.C. Charles B. Rangel U.S. House of Representatives (D-N.Y.) Washington, D.C. Susan Rice Brookings Institution Washington, D.C. Hartley Richardson James Richardson & Sons, Ltd. Winnipeg, Manitoba Joseph E. Robert, Jr. J.E. Robert Companies McLean, Va. John D. Rockefeller IV U.S. Senate (D-W.V.) Washington, D.C. Kenneth Rogoff Center for Int’l Development, Harvard Cambridge, Mass. Charles Rose The Charlie Rose Show, PBS New York, N.Y. Irene B. Rosenfeld CEO Kraft Foods Northfield, Ill Dennis Ross Ambassador Counselor and Ziegler Washington, D.C. David M. Rubenstein The Carlyle Group Washington, D.C. Luis Rubio Center of Research for Development Mexico City, Mexico Arthur F. Ryan Prudential Financial, Inc. Newark, N.J. Jaime Serra SAI Consulting Mexico City, Mexico Dinakar Singh TPG-Axon Capital New York, N.Y. Anne-Marie Slaughter Princeton University Princeton, N.J. Gordon Smith Centre for Global Studies, U. of Victoria Victoria, B.C. Donald R. Sobey Empire Company Ltd. Halifax, Nova Scotia Ronald D. Southern ATCO Group Calgary, Alberta James B. Steinberg LBJ School of Public Affairs, U. of Texas Austin, Texas Jessica Stern Program on Terrorism & the Law, Harvard Cambridge, Mass. Barbara Stymiest RBC Financial Group Toronto, Ontario Lawrence H. Summers Harvard University Cambridge, Mass. John J. Sweeney AFL-CIO Washington, D.C. Strobe Talbott The Brookings Institution Washington, D.C. George J. Tenet Georgetown Univ., former CIA Director Washington, D.C. John Thain New York Stock Exchange, Inc. New York, N.Y. G. Richard Thoman Columbia University New York, N.Y. Paul A. Volcker Wolfensohn & Co., Inc., frmr Fed. Res. Chair.New York, N.Y. William H. Webster Former CIA Director Washington, D.C. Fareed Zakaria Newsweek International New York, N.Y. Lorenzo H. Zambrano CEMEX Monterey, Mexico Ernesto Zedillo Former president of Mexico; Yale Univ. New Haven, Conn. Mortimer B. Zuckerman Chairman, U.S. News & World Report New York, N.Y. William T. Coleman, Jr. Lifetime Trustee, Trilateral Commission Washington, D.C. Henry A. Kissinger Lifetime Trustee, Trilateral Commission Washington, D.C. Robert S. McNamara Lifetime Trustee, Trilateral Commission, frmr pres., World Bank; frmr sec.of Defense; frmr pres., Ford Motor. Washington, D.C. David Rockefeller Founder, Lifetime Trustee, Trilateral Comm. New York, N.Y.
NEW TRILATERAL MEMBERS ATTENDING FROM EUROPE
Patricia Barbizet CEO Artemis Group, France Dermot Gleeson Chairman, AIB Group, Ireland Elisabeth Guigou French National Assembly, France Nigel Higgins Senior Partner N M Rohschild & Sons, UK Jerzy Kozminski President & CEO Polish-American Freedom, Poland Thomas Leysen CEO Umicore, Belgium Manfred Bischoff Chairman, SNCF, France Arpad Kovacs Pres. State Audit Office Hungary, Budapest Friedrich Merz Member of the German Bundestag, Germany Pietro Modiano Mng. Director CEO Intesa Sanpaolo, Italy Hans Reisenhuber (returning) Member of the German Bundestag, Germany Jeroen van der Veer Chief Executive, Royal Dutch Shell, The Netherlands
|Rothschild / GTP back to Rothschild North America / GTP|
|NEW YORK, May 31 /PRNewswire/ -- Rothschild
announced today the formation of a strategic alliance
with Global Technology Partners, LLC, a specialized
group of professionals, including former U.S. Secretary
of Defense William Perry, who have extensive public and
private sector experience in the technology, defense,
and aerospace industries. Global Technology Partners
combine CEO, senior management and board of director
participation in both Fortune 500 and start-up ventures
with high-level federal government experience. Gerald
Rosenfeld, Chief Executive Officer of Rothschild North
America, said, "We believe the combination of
Rothschild's global relationships and Global Technology
Partner's access to and knowledge of the international
defense and aerospace industry will create high level
strategic advisory and investment opportunities. These
opportunities will arise from the continued
consolidation of second and third tier defense
companies, the anticipated relationships that are
forming among aerospace and defense companies on a cross
border basis and GTP's insight into defense markets and
technologies." Dr. Perry added, "Rothschild's worldwide
reach and relationships are a good fit to GTP's
perspective on the rapidly-evolving sectors in which we
specialize. With Rothschild, we will have a very strong
team indeed." Rothschild, the international investment
bank, has 50 offices in over 30 countries around the
world, including: London; Paris; New York; Toronto;
Frankfurt; Milan; Hong Kong; Singapore; Sydney;
Melbourne; and Tokyo.
Brief Bios of Global Technology Partners:
-- Dr. William J. Perry Dr. William J. Perry is a Senior Partner and the Chairman of Global Technology Partners, LLC. Dr. Perry served as the U.S. Secretary of Defense from 1994 to 1997 and as Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1993 to 1994. Earlier in his career, he served as U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. Dr. Perry also has extensive business experience. He was a co-founder and President of ESL Inc., which pioneered the application of Hambrecht & Quist, an investment banking firm specializing in high technology companies, and co-founder and Chairman of Technology Strategies and Alliances, a technology-oriented investment banking and consulting firm. He is an advisor to many corporations and recently completed terms as a director of the Boeing Company, United Technologies Corporation, and Hambrecht & Quist.
-- Dr. John M. Deutch Dr. John M. Deutch is a Senior Partner of Global Technology Partners, LLC. Dr. Deutch has held a number of significant government and academic posts over the last three decades. From 1995 to 1997, Dr. Deutch served as Director of Central Intelligence for the U.S. and was in charge of the Central Intelligence Agency. He had previously served as U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1994 to 1995 and Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisitions and Technology from 1993 to 1994. Earlier in his career, Dr. Deutch served in the U.S. Department of Energy as Director of Energy Research and Undersecretary of Energy, where he was responsible for research, development and demonstration programs for all energy technologies. Dr. Deutch serves as a director of Ariad Pharmaceutical, Citigroup. CMS Energy, Cummins Engine, Raytheon Corporation and Schlumberger Ltd.
-- Dr. John P. White Dr. John P. White is a Senior Partner of Global Technology Partners, LLC. Dr. White has held several senior federal government positions during his career, including U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1995 to 1997, Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget from 1978 to 1981 and Assistant Secretary of Defense, Manpower, Reserve Affairs and Logistics from 1977 to 1978. Dr. White also has extensive private sector experience, having served as Chairman and CEO of Interactive Systems Corporation from 1981 to 1988 and, following its sale to the Eastman Kodak Company in 1988, as General Manager of the Integration and Systems Products Division of Kodak, and a Vice President of Kodak until 1992. Dr. White also spent ten years with the RAND Corporation, where he was the Senior Vice President for National Security Research Programs and a member of the Board of Trustees. He serves as a director of Wang Government Services, Inc. and IRG International.
-- Dr. Paul G. Kaminski Dr. Paul G. Kaminski is a Senior Partner of Global Technology Partners, LLC. During his career, Dr. Kaminski has held various senior level positions focusing on advanced technology in both the public and private sectors. Dr. Kaminski most recently served as U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology from 1994 to 1997. His prior experience with the federal government includes twenty years as an Air Force officer, during which time he was Director of the US Low Observable (Stealth) Program. He also managed the development of advanced space reconnaissance systems and new sensor technology. Dr. Kaminski currently serves as Chairman and CEO of Technovation, Inc., a consulting firm focusing on business strategy and advanced technology. He previously held the post of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Technology Strategies and Alliances, a technology-oriented investment banking and consulting firm that he co-founded in 1985 with Dr. William Perry. Dr. Kaminski is a director of General Dynamics, Anteon Corporation, Condor Systems, Inc., DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc., DynCorp, Eagle- Picher Technologies, and Veridian.
-- Dr. Ashton B. Carter Dr. Ashton B. Carter is a Senior Partner of Global Technology Partners, LLC. From 1993 to 1996, Dr. Carter served as U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy, with responsibility for formulating U.S. policy towards Russia and other states of the former Soviet Union, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction worldwide, arms control negotiations, and oversight of the U.S. nuclear arsenal and missile defense programs. He is also the former Chairman of the NATO High Level Group.
-- Dr. Robert J. Hermann Dr. Robert J. Hermann is a Senior Partner of Global Technology Partners, LLC. Dr. Hermann most recently served as Senior Vice President for Science and Technology at United Technologies Corporation, where he was responsible for the development of the company's technical resources. Dr. Hermann joined United Technologies in 1982 as Vice President of Systems Technology in the Electronics Sector, and was named Vice President of Science and Technology in 1987. Prior to joining United Technologies, Dr. Hermann served twenty years with the National Security Agency, with assignments in research and development, operations and NATO. In 1977, he was appointed Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Communications, Command, Control and Intelligence. In 1979, he was named Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Research, Development and Logistics and in parallel was Director of the National Reconnaissance Office. He is a director of DeCrane Aircraft Holdings, Inc., and Condor Systems, Inc.
-- Irving B. Yoskowitz Irving B. Yoskowitz is a Senior Partner of Global Technology Partners, LLC. Prior to his association with Global Technology Partners, Mr. Yoskowitz spent nearly two decades with United Technologies Corporation, where he served as General Counsel since 1981 and as an Executive Vice President since 1990. He was the company's lead negotiator for major domestic and international acquisitions, divestitures and joint ventures, and served as a member of the company's Management Executive Committee. Mr. Yoskowitz is a Director of BBA Group, plc., and EQUANT, N.V.